58
Sangita Bose Bombay Klaus Kern Stuttgart Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more Antonio M. García-García Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~amg73/ Santos & Way Santa Barbara PRB, 86, 064526 (2012) PRB 84,104525 (2011) Editor„s Suggestion Pedro Ribeiro Dresden PRL 108, 097004 (2012) Richter & Urbina Regensburg Altshuler Columbia Yuzbashyan Rutgers PRB 83, 014510 (2011) Nature Materials 9, 550 (2010)

Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Sangita Bose

Bombay

Klaus Kern

Stuttgart

Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Antonio M. García-García Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University

http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~amg73/

Santos & Way

Santa Barbara

PRB, 86, 064526 (2012)

PRB 84,104525 (2011)

Editor„s Suggestion

Pedro Ribeiro

Dresden

PRL 108, 097004 (2012)

Richter & Urbina

Regensburg

Altshuler

Columbia Yuzbashyan

Rutgers

PRB 83, 014510 (2011)

Nature Materials 9, 550 (2010)

Page 2: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

5.33 Å

0.00 Å

5.33 Å

0.00 Å

0 nm

7 nm

What?

Single grains Nanowires

Thin Films JJ Arrays

R << R <<

Lz << R,l <<

Page 3: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Mesoscopic + SC

Nanocircuits

Enhancement of Tc?

Why? 5.33 Å

0.00 Å

5.33 Å

0.00 Å

0 nm

7 nm

Beauty of quantum

coherence

Despite Mermin-Wegner

theorem?

Where is the limit?

Page 4: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

How to enhance

SC substantially?

$10

Question

$106

Question

Mechanism of SC

in cuprates?

Enhancement?

? with control

Page 5: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

+Experimental

Control

+Predictive

power

No

Control

Theory Drifts

Trial and error

Page 6: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Abeles, Cohen, Cullen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 17, 632 (1966)

A.M. Goldman, Dynes, Tinkham…

Thin Films?

Crow, Parks, Douglass, Jensen, Giaver, Zeller....

JJ array?

Page 7: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Shape Resonances Blatt, Thompson

Phys. Lett. 5, 6 (1963)

Shell Effects Parmenter, Phys. Rev. 166,

392 (1967)

Thin Films Single grains

∆~ ?

Page 8: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

BCS superconductivity Finite size effects

V

Δ~ De-1/

V finite

Δ=?

Page 9: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

A.M. Goldman et al. PRL 62 2180 (1989)

PRB 47 5931 (1993)

Smoother

Thinner

Disordered

Transition

𝑅𝑁 > 𝑅𝑞

BKT

Vortices

unbinding

Page 10: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Xue et al., Science 306, 1915 (2004) Shih et al., Science 324, 1314

(2009)

Recent Atomic scale control

Pb

Xue et al., Nat Phys, 6 (2010),104.

Page 11: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

PRB 75 014519

(2007)

Stress, substrate

Quantum size

effects

Xue, Liu et al.

arxiv:1208.6054

Page 12: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Schneider, et al.,

PRL 102, 207002 (2009)

PRL 108, 126802 (2012)

Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 167001 (2008)

Hasegawa, et al.

Islands

Page 13: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Nanowires

Tinkham et al.

Nature 404, 971 (1990)

Superconductor

Insulator

transition

R <<

Page 14: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

McCumber & Halperin

PRB 1, 1054 (1970).

Langer & Ambegaokar,

PR. 164, 498 (1967).

Zaikin, A. D., Golubev, et al,

PRL 78, 1552 (1997).

Phase-slips

Thermal

Quantum

|Δ r, t |𝑒𝑖𝜃(𝑟,𝑡)

Δ(𝑟0, 𝑡0) ≈ 0 Fluctuation

𝜃 ≈ 0 → 2𝜋

Finite

Resistence

𝑅 ∝ 𝑒−𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡

Instantons BKT transition

Coulomb-Gas

Quantitative?

Page 15: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Carbon nanotubes Fluctuations

High Tc?

How to suppress

fluctuations?

Yang,PRB 74 155414 (2006)

Phy. Rev. Lett. 86, 2416 (2001)

Science 292, 2462 (2001)

Electric field effect

Dissipation Ropes

Single

Phase Slips Lehtinen, PRB 85 094508 (2012)

PRB 80, 214515 (2009)

Page 16: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Is enhancement of

superconductivity

possible?

Page 17: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Cuprates high Tc Heterostructures

Bozovic et al., Nature 455, 782 (2008)

Higher Tc!!

Intrinsic inhomogeneities

Page 18: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Xue et al.: Arxiv: 12015694

Iron Pnictides

Heterostructures

Page 19: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Enhancement of

Tc by disorder

Bianconi, et al., Nature 466, 841 (2010)

Fractal distributions of

dopants enhances SC

in cuprates

Inhomogeneities Higher Tc

PRL 108, 017002 (2012)

Page 20: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

LaAlO3 /SrTiO3

Heterostructures

Triscone, Nature 456 624 (2008)

Control

&Tunability

Spin-Orbit

Disorder

Magnetism

PRB 85 020457 (2012)

PRL 104, 126803 (2010)

Localization

Exotic Quantum

Matter Lesueur, arXiv:1112.2633

E Field effect

Topology

Relevance

Page 21: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Grains

Enhancement, yes

Origin?

Page 22: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

B closes gap

Odd-even effects

~

Supercon

ductivity?

Isolated grain?

Yes, superconductivity

1959

Ralph, Black,Tinkham,

Superconductivity in

Single Metal Particles

PRL 74, 3241-3244 (1995).

Page 23: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

von Delft, Braun, Larkin, Sierra, Dukelsky,

Yuzbashyan, Matveev, Smith, Ambegaokar

BCS fine until / Δ0 ~ 1/2

Theoretical

response

T = 0

Ultrasmall grains

/ Δ0 > 1

Richardson

Exact diagonalization, RPA, Path

Integral, Montecarlo......

It‟s exact. I did it

20 years ago

BCS sharp transition

Richardson no transition

J. von Delft et al., Phys. Rep., 345, 61 (2001)

Page 24: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

>> Heiselberg (2002): harmonic

potentials, cold atom

Kresin, Boyaci, Ovchinnikov

(2007) : Spherical grain, high Tc

Peeters, Shanenko, Croitoru,

(2005-): BCS, BdG in a wire,

cylinder..

Olofsson (2008): Estimation of

fluctuations in BCS

Devreese (2006): Richardson

equations in a box

Enhancement of SC

is possible!

Page 25: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

BCS

superconductivity

Finite size

effects

V

Δ~ De-1/

V finite

Δ=?

Page 26: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Chaotic

grains?

Semiclassical techniques

1/kF L <<1 Analytical?

Quantum observables in terms

of classical quantities Berry, Gutzwiller, Balian, Bloch

Page 27: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Bogouliobov de

Gennes… difficult

>>

BCS fine but..

Expansion in

1/kFL, /∆0

L ~ 10nm

Page 28: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

3d chaotic

Al grain

kF = 17.5 nm-1

0 = 0.24mV

L = 6nm, Dirichlet, /Δ0=0.67

L= 6nm, Neumann, /Δ0,=0.67

L = 8nm, Dirichlet, /Δ0=0.32

L = 10nm, Dirichlet, /Δ0,= 0.08

For L< 9nm leading

correction comes

from I

PRL 100, 187001 (2008)

PRB 83, 014510 (2011)

Page 29: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Fluctuations

ξ > L

No fluctuations

ξ < L

0 >>

Long range order?

Symmetries

Page 30: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

R ~ 4-30nm

Single, Isolated Sn

and Pb grains

B closes gap

Tunneling

conductance

Almost hemispherical

Kern Bose

STM

Page 31: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Sn

Page 32: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

+

Page 33: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

5.33 Å

0.00 Å

5.33 Å

0.00 Å

0 nm

7 nm

Page 34: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Pb

More fun? Why not

Ribeiro,

Dresden

Beyond

mean field

Page 35: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Beyond mean field

Random Phase

Approx

Disorder, Coulomb....

Fluctuations T < Tc finite resistivity

Stronger e-e interaction

Thermal

fluctuations

Muhlschlegel, Scalapino (1972)

Larkin, Gorkov ....

Quantum

Fluctuations

Path Integral

Static Path Approx

Richardson Eqs

Page 36: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

T=0

deviations from

mean field

Richardson‟s

equations

Ground

state

energy

Richardson ~ 1968,

Yuzbashyan, Altshuler ~ 2005

Von Delft, Braun,

Dukelsky, Marsiglio,

Sierra, Smith,

Ambegaokar

D ED

d

Expansion

in /0

Page 37: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

T=0

BCS size effects

Part I

Deviations BCS

Richardson

Page 38: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Thermal

fluctuations Path integral

0 d grains

homogenous

Static path

approach (SPA)

Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation

Scalapino et al. 70‟s

Page 39: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Thermal fluctuations

Static Path Approach

BCS finite size effects

Part I

Richardson formalism

T ~ Tc

(T) simple

interpolation

Quantum Fluctuations

PRB 84,104525 (2011)

Editor„s Suggestion

Page 40: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Quantum + Thermal?

Coulomb?

Dynamical phonons?

Richardson

solution

Any / Δ0

T=0

RPA+SPA ,Ribeiro and

AGG, Phys. Rev. Lett.

108, 097004 (2012)

/ Δ0 << 1

Any T

SPA+RPA?

Divergences at

intermediate T Rossignoli and Canosa

Ann. of Phys. 275, 1, (1999)

BCS OK / Δ0 ~

1/2

Page 41: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Where‟s the problem?

Of course the (zero

modes) coordinates!!! Castellani, et al. PRL 78,

1612 (1997)

Page 42: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

PRL 108, 097004 (2012)

Page 43: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Charging effects?

The same

Charging effects Perturbative

Non perturbative

Odd-Even at T=0

Charging

=

fluctuations

Page 44: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Mason, Goldbart et al, Nature

Physics 8 59 (2012)

Josephson

junctions

NEXT Enhancement

SC?

Page 45: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

1966

+Experimental

control

+Predictive

power

1995

Now

Nature Physics 6, 104 (2010), Science 324, 1314 (2009).

Page 46: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Holographic

superconductivity in

confined geometries?

Finite Size

+

Strong interactions ?

Tough for even

conventional superconductors

Jorge

Santos

Benson

Way

Page 47: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Strongly coupled

field theory in d

N=4 Super-Yang Mills

CFT

Anti de Sitter space

AdS

Holographic principle

Weakly coupled

gravity in d+1

AdS/CFT correspondence

Maldacena‟s conjecture

t‟Hooft, Susskind, Weinberg, Witten....

Page 48: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Geometrization of Wilson RG

Extra dimension?

r r0

Page 49: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Hartnoll, Herzog, Horowitz

QCD Quark gluon plasma

Holographic superconductivity

Gubser, Son 2003

2008

Easy to compute in the

gravity dual

Detailed

dictionary

Holography beyond string theory

2012 Quantum criticality, non-equilibrium.. Zaanen, Sachdev, Philips

&

Page 50: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

I do not know

I know

that Spontaneous breaking

U(1) at low T

Complex scalar

Finite

H = ?

An answer looking for a question

Page 51: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Simplest dual gravity theory

Metric

complex scalar

Page 52: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Equations of motion:

Boundary

conditions: r r = r0

At = 0

How

small?

Dictionary:

Page 53: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

“Superconductivity” only for l < lc

Mean field behavior

Fluctuations?

Page 54: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

No thermal fluctuations

Large N artefact

Page 55: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Interactions depends on system size!

PRB, 86, 064526 (2012)

Page 56: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

Substantial enhancement of Tc

Control on high Tc

heterostructures

Control on grains

arrangements Non-equilibrium

Heterostructures

Collections of grains

Topology

Theory Experiments

Next

Page 57: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

CONTROL

PREDICTIVE

POWER

Enhancement = $106

Theory

Page 58: Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more

THANKS!

感谢您的关注