Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sangita Bose
Bombay
Klaus Kern
Stuttgart
Nanoscale superconductivity: Smaller is different and more
Antonio M. García-García Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University
http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~amg73/
Santos & Way
Santa Barbara
PRB, 86, 064526 (2012)
PRB 84,104525 (2011)
Editor„s Suggestion
Pedro Ribeiro
Dresden
PRL 108, 097004 (2012)
Richter & Urbina
Regensburg
Altshuler
Columbia Yuzbashyan
Rutgers
PRB 83, 014510 (2011)
Nature Materials 9, 550 (2010)
5.33 Å
0.00 Å
5.33 Å
0.00 Å
0 nm
7 nm
What?
Single grains Nanowires
Thin Films JJ Arrays
R << R <<
Lz << R,l <<
Mesoscopic + SC
Nanocircuits
Enhancement of Tc?
Why? 5.33 Å
0.00 Å
5.33 Å
0.00 Å
0 nm
7 nm
Beauty of quantum
coherence
Despite Mermin-Wegner
theorem?
Where is the limit?
How to enhance
SC substantially?
$10
Question
$106
Question
Mechanism of SC
in cuprates?
Enhancement?
? with control
+Experimental
Control
+Predictive
power
No
Control
Theory Drifts
Trial and error
Abeles, Cohen, Cullen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 17, 632 (1966)
A.M. Goldman, Dynes, Tinkham…
Thin Films?
Crow, Parks, Douglass, Jensen, Giaver, Zeller....
JJ array?
Shape Resonances Blatt, Thompson
Phys. Lett. 5, 6 (1963)
Shell Effects Parmenter, Phys. Rev. 166,
392 (1967)
Thin Films Single grains
∆~ ?
BCS superconductivity Finite size effects
V
Δ~ De-1/
V finite
Δ=?
A.M. Goldman et al. PRL 62 2180 (1989)
PRB 47 5931 (1993)
Smoother
Thinner
Disordered
Transition
𝑅𝑁 > 𝑅𝑞
BKT
Vortices
unbinding
Xue et al., Science 306, 1915 (2004) Shih et al., Science 324, 1314
(2009)
Recent Atomic scale control
Pb
Xue et al., Nat Phys, 6 (2010),104.
PRB 75 014519
(2007)
Stress, substrate
Quantum size
effects
Xue, Liu et al.
arxiv:1208.6054
Schneider, et al.,
PRL 102, 207002 (2009)
PRL 108, 126802 (2012)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 167001 (2008)
Hasegawa, et al.
Islands
Nanowires
Tinkham et al.
Nature 404, 971 (1990)
Superconductor
Insulator
transition
R <<
McCumber & Halperin
PRB 1, 1054 (1970).
Langer & Ambegaokar,
PR. 164, 498 (1967).
Zaikin, A. D., Golubev, et al,
PRL 78, 1552 (1997).
Phase-slips
Thermal
Quantum
|Δ r, t |𝑒𝑖𝜃(𝑟,𝑡)
Δ(𝑟0, 𝑡0) ≈ 0 Fluctuation
𝜃 ≈ 0 → 2𝜋
Finite
Resistence
𝑅 ∝ 𝑒−𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡
Instantons BKT transition
Coulomb-Gas
Quantitative?
Carbon nanotubes Fluctuations
High Tc?
How to suppress
fluctuations?
Yang,PRB 74 155414 (2006)
Phy. Rev. Lett. 86, 2416 (2001)
Science 292, 2462 (2001)
Electric field effect
Dissipation Ropes
Single
Phase Slips Lehtinen, PRB 85 094508 (2012)
PRB 80, 214515 (2009)
Is enhancement of
superconductivity
possible?
Cuprates high Tc Heterostructures
Bozovic et al., Nature 455, 782 (2008)
Higher Tc!!
Intrinsic inhomogeneities
Xue et al.: Arxiv: 12015694
Iron Pnictides
Heterostructures
Enhancement of
Tc by disorder
Bianconi, et al., Nature 466, 841 (2010)
Fractal distributions of
dopants enhances SC
in cuprates
Inhomogeneities Higher Tc
PRL 108, 017002 (2012)
LaAlO3 /SrTiO3
Heterostructures
Triscone, Nature 456 624 (2008)
Control
&Tunability
Spin-Orbit
Disorder
Magnetism
PRB 85 020457 (2012)
PRL 104, 126803 (2010)
Localization
Exotic Quantum
Matter Lesueur, arXiv:1112.2633
E Field effect
Topology
Relevance
Grains
Enhancement, yes
Origin?
B closes gap
Odd-even effects
~
Supercon
ductivity?
Isolated grain?
Yes, superconductivity
1959
Ralph, Black,Tinkham,
Superconductivity in
Single Metal Particles
PRL 74, 3241-3244 (1995).
von Delft, Braun, Larkin, Sierra, Dukelsky,
Yuzbashyan, Matveev, Smith, Ambegaokar
BCS fine until / Δ0 ~ 1/2
Theoretical
response
T = 0
Ultrasmall grains
/ Δ0 > 1
Richardson
Exact diagonalization, RPA, Path
Integral, Montecarlo......
It‟s exact. I did it
20 years ago
BCS sharp transition
Richardson no transition
J. von Delft et al., Phys. Rep., 345, 61 (2001)
>> Heiselberg (2002): harmonic
potentials, cold atom
Kresin, Boyaci, Ovchinnikov
(2007) : Spherical grain, high Tc
Peeters, Shanenko, Croitoru,
(2005-): BCS, BdG in a wire,
cylinder..
Olofsson (2008): Estimation of
fluctuations in BCS
Devreese (2006): Richardson
equations in a box
Enhancement of SC
is possible!
BCS
superconductivity
Finite size
effects
V
Δ~ De-1/
V finite
Δ=?
Chaotic
grains?
Semiclassical techniques
1/kF L <<1 Analytical?
Quantum observables in terms
of classical quantities Berry, Gutzwiller, Balian, Bloch
Bogouliobov de
Gennes… difficult
>>
BCS fine but..
Expansion in
1/kFL, /∆0
L ~ 10nm
3d chaotic
Al grain
kF = 17.5 nm-1
0 = 0.24mV
L = 6nm, Dirichlet, /Δ0=0.67
L= 6nm, Neumann, /Δ0,=0.67
L = 8nm, Dirichlet, /Δ0=0.32
L = 10nm, Dirichlet, /Δ0,= 0.08
For L< 9nm leading
correction comes
from I
PRL 100, 187001 (2008)
PRB 83, 014510 (2011)
Fluctuations
ξ > L
No fluctuations
ξ < L
0 >>
Long range order?
Symmetries
R ~ 4-30nm
Single, Isolated Sn
and Pb grains
B closes gap
Tunneling
conductance
Almost hemispherical
Kern Bose
STM
Sn
+
5.33 Å
0.00 Å
5.33 Å
0.00 Å
0 nm
7 nm
Pb
More fun? Why not
Ribeiro,
Dresden
Beyond
mean field
Beyond mean field
Random Phase
Approx
Disorder, Coulomb....
Fluctuations T < Tc finite resistivity
Stronger e-e interaction
Thermal
fluctuations
Muhlschlegel, Scalapino (1972)
Larkin, Gorkov ....
Quantum
Fluctuations
Path Integral
Static Path Approx
Richardson Eqs
T=0
deviations from
mean field
Richardson‟s
equations
Ground
state
energy
Richardson ~ 1968,
Yuzbashyan, Altshuler ~ 2005
Von Delft, Braun,
Dukelsky, Marsiglio,
Sierra, Smith,
Ambegaokar
D ED
d
Expansion
in /0
T=0
BCS size effects
Part I
Deviations BCS
Richardson
Thermal
fluctuations Path integral
0 d grains
homogenous
Static path
approach (SPA)
Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation
Scalapino et al. 70‟s
Thermal fluctuations
Static Path Approach
BCS finite size effects
Part I
Richardson formalism
T ~ Tc
(T) simple
interpolation
Quantum Fluctuations
PRB 84,104525 (2011)
Editor„s Suggestion
Quantum + Thermal?
Coulomb?
Dynamical phonons?
Richardson
solution
Any / Δ0
T=0
RPA+SPA ,Ribeiro and
AGG, Phys. Rev. Lett.
108, 097004 (2012)
/ Δ0 << 1
Any T
SPA+RPA?
Divergences at
intermediate T Rossignoli and Canosa
Ann. of Phys. 275, 1, (1999)
BCS OK / Δ0 ~
1/2
Where‟s the problem?
Of course the (zero
modes) coordinates!!! Castellani, et al. PRL 78,
1612 (1997)
PRL 108, 097004 (2012)
Charging effects?
The same
Charging effects Perturbative
Non perturbative
Odd-Even at T=0
Charging
=
fluctuations
Mason, Goldbart et al, Nature
Physics 8 59 (2012)
Josephson
junctions
NEXT Enhancement
SC?
1966
+Experimental
control
+Predictive
power
1995
Now
Nature Physics 6, 104 (2010), Science 324, 1314 (2009).
Holographic
superconductivity in
confined geometries?
Finite Size
+
Strong interactions ?
Tough for even
conventional superconductors
Jorge
Santos
Benson
Way
Strongly coupled
field theory in d
N=4 Super-Yang Mills
CFT
Anti de Sitter space
AdS
Holographic principle
Weakly coupled
gravity in d+1
AdS/CFT correspondence
Maldacena‟s conjecture
t‟Hooft, Susskind, Weinberg, Witten....
Geometrization of Wilson RG
Extra dimension?
r r0
Hartnoll, Herzog, Horowitz
QCD Quark gluon plasma
Holographic superconductivity
Gubser, Son 2003
2008
Easy to compute in the
gravity dual
Detailed
dictionary
Holography beyond string theory
2012 Quantum criticality, non-equilibrium.. Zaanen, Sachdev, Philips
&
I do not know
I know
that Spontaneous breaking
U(1) at low T
Complex scalar
Finite
H = ?
An answer looking for a question
Simplest dual gravity theory
Metric
complex scalar
Equations of motion:
Boundary
conditions: r r = r0
At = 0
How
small?
Dictionary:
“Superconductivity” only for l < lc
Mean field behavior
Fluctuations?
No thermal fluctuations
Large N artefact
Interactions depends on system size!
PRB, 86, 064526 (2012)
Substantial enhancement of Tc
Control on high Tc
heterostructures
Control on grains
arrangements Non-equilibrium
Heterostructures
Collections of grains
Topology
Theory Experiments
Next
CONTROL
PREDICTIVE
POWER
Enhancement = $106
Theory
THANKS!
感谢您的关注