Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
1 of 14
C O R O N A V I R U S
Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severityChristopher Maucourant1*, Iva Filipovic1*, Andrea Ponzetta1*, Soo Aleman2,3, Martin Cornillet1, Laura Hertwig1, Benedikt Strunz1, Antonio Lentini4, Björn Reinius4, Demi Brownlie1, Angelica Cuapio1, Eivind Heggernes Ask5,6, Ryan M. Hull7, Alvaro Haroun-Izquierdo1, Marie Schaffer1, Jonas Klingström1, Elin Folkesson2,8, Marcus Buggert1, Johan K. Sandberg1, Lars I. Eriksson9,10, Olav Rooyackers10,11, Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren1, Karl-Johan Malmberg1,5,6, Jakob Michaëlsson1, Nicole Marquardt1, Quirin Hammer1, Kristoffer Strålin2,3, Niklas K. Björkström1†, The Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group‡
Understanding innate immune responses in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is important to decipher mech-anisms of host responses and interpret disease pathogenesis. Natural killer (NK) cells are innate effector lympho-cytes that respond to acute viral infections but might also contribute to immunopathology. Using 28-color flow cytometry, we here reveal strong NK cell activation across distinct subsets in peripheral blood of COVID-19 patients. This pattern was mirrored in single-cell RNA sequencing signatures of NK cells in bronchoalveolar lavage from COVID-19 patients. Unsupervised high-dimensional analysis of peripheral blood NK cells furthermore identified distinct NK cell immunotypes that were linked to disease severity. Hallmarks of these immunotypes were high expression of perforin, NKG2C, and Ksp37, reflecting increased presence of adaptive NK cells in circulation of patients with severe disease. Last, arming of CD56bright NK cells was observed across COVID-19 disease states, driven by a defined protein-protein interaction network of inflammatory soluble factors. This study provides a detailed map of the NK cell activation landscape in COVID-19 disease.
INTRODUCTIONThe ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is presenting the human popu-lation with profound challenges. SARS-CoV-2 can cause coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, which, in the worst cases, leads to severe manifestations such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, multi-organ failure, and death (1). These manifestations may be caused by hyperactivated and misdirected immune responses. High levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and an ensuing cytokine storm in the absence of appropriate type I and III interferon responses associate with severe COVID-19 disease (1–6). Whereas emerging reports suggest that protective immunity is formed in convalescent patients with both neutralizing antibodies and SARS-CoV-2–specific T cells (7–9), considerably less is known about early innate lymphocyte re-sponses toward the SARS-CoV-2 infection and how they relate to host responses and disease progression. In this study, we evaluated
natural killer (NK) cell activation in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection and resulting COVID-19 disease.
NK cells are innate effector lymphocytes that are typically divided into cytokine-producing CD56bright NK cells and cytotoxic CD56dim NK cells (10). Evidence for a direct role of NK cells in protection against viral infections comes from patients with selective NK cell deficiencies, as these develop fulminant viral infections, predomi-nantly with herpes viruses (11, 12). Human NK cells have also been shown to rapidly respond during the acute phase of infections in humans with hantavirus, tick-borne encephalitis virus, influenza A virus (IAV), and dengue virus, as well as after vaccination with live-attenuated yellow fever (13–16). NK cells not only have the ca-pacity to directly target and kill infected cells but also can influence adaptive T cell responses. The degree of NK cell activation can func-tion as a rheostat in regulating T cells, where a certain level of NK cell activation might promote infection control, while another degree of activation is related to immunopathology (17). Compared with peripheral blood, the human lung is enriched in NK cells (16, 18, 19). Human lung NK cells display a differentiated pheno-type and also have the capacity to respond to viral infections such as IAV (16, 18, 19). In COVID-19, emerging studies have reported low peripheral blood NK cell numbers in patients with moderate and severe disease (4, 20–23). Two recent reports assessing the single- cell landscape of immune cells in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) flu-id of COVID-19 patients have suggested that NK cell numbers are increased at this site of infection (24, 25). However, a detailed map of the NK cell landscape in clinical SARS-CoV-2 infection has not yet been established.
Given the important role of NK cells in acute viral infections, their relatively high presence within lung tissue, as well as the links between NK cell activation, T cell responses, and development of immunopathology, we here performed a detailed assessment of NK
1Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 2Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 3Division of Infectious Diseases and Dermatology, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 4Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 5Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 6K.G. Jebsen Centre for Cancer Immunotherapy, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Uni-versity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 7SciLifeLab, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 8Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 9Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section for Anesthesiology and In-tensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 10Function Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 11Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Division for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.*These authors contributed equally to this work.†Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]‡The members of the Karolinksa COVID-19 Study Group can be found in the Acknowledgments.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributedunder a CreativeCommons AttributionLicense 4.0 (CC BY)
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
2 of 14
cells in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 disease. Using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 disease were recruited early during their disease, sampled for peripheral blood, and analyzed by 28-color flow cytometry to assess NK cell activation, education, and presence of adaptive NK cells. The results obtained are discussed in relation to the role of NK cell responses in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated COVID-19 disease immunopathogenesis.
RESULTSStudy design, clinical cohort, and general NK cell activation in COVID-19Twenty-seven in-hospital patients with COVID-19 disease (10 moderate and 17 severe) were prospectively recruited after admission to the Karolinska University Hospital as part of a larger immune cell atlas effort (Karolinska COVID-19 Immune Atlas). Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to ensure the setup of homogeneous patient cohorts, including time since symptom debut in relation to hospital admission, and disease severity staging (Fig. 1, A and B). Seventeen healthy controls that were SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) seronegative and symptom-free at time of sampling were included as controls. To minimize inter-experimental variability and batch effects between patients and controls, all samples (n = 44) were acquired, processed, and analyzed fresh during three consecutive weeks in April and May 2020 at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Stockholm, Sweden (Fig. 1B). More detailed patient characteris-tics are provided in Materials and Methods and tables S1 and S2.
To study the NK cell response, we analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with a 28-color NK cell–focused flow cytometry panel (table S3, gating strategy in fig. S1A). No change in total NK cell percentages, or the percentage of CD56dim and CD56bright NK cells, was noted in patients compared with controls. However, the absolute counts of total NK cells, CD56dim NK cells, and CD56bright NK cells were severely reduced in patients compared with controls (Fig. 1C and fig. S1A). NK cell activation was assessed by analyzing expression of Ki-67, HLA-DR (human leukocyte antigen-DR), and CD69 (Fig. 1D). A robust NK cell activation was noted in COVID- 19 patients, where the degree of activation was similar in moderate and severe patients (Fig. 1, E and F). CD56dim NK cells undergo continuous differentiation starting from less differentiated NKG2A+ and CD62L+ cells transitioning toward more terminally differentiated CD57+ NK cells (26, 27). A higher percentage of both NKG2A+ and CD62L+ CD56dim NK cells expressed Ki-67 compared with NKG2A− and CD62L− cells in patients with COVID-19 (Fig. 1, G and H). A subsequent Boolean analysis, simultaneously taking coexpression patterns of NKG2A, CD62L, and CD57 into account, revealed that the NK cell response in patients with COVID-19 occurred primarily among less differentiated CD62L+ NK cells (fig. S1B).
Together, using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and patient recruitment during a defined period of time, we obtained a well- controlled cohort of patients with moderate and severe COVID-19. Peripheral blood NK cells in these patients were robustly activated compared with healthy controls. The general degree of activation was, however, not directly associated with disease severity.
Phenotypic assessment of NK cells in COVID-19We next performed a detailed phenotypic assessment of CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells in the COVID-19 patients. By principal com-
ponents analysis (PCA) of CD56bright (including 26 phenotypic parameters) and CD56dim NK cells (27 phenotypic parameters), patients clustered separately from healthy controls (Fig. 2, A and B). This was, among other phenotypic markers, driven by changes in expression of CD98, Ki-67, and Ksp37 in CD56bright (fig. S2A) and Tim-3, CD98, CD38, CD69, and Ksp37 in CD56dim NK cells (fig. S2B). Flow cytometry analysis by manual gating further revealed increased expression of perforin, Ksp37, MIP-1 (macrophage inflammatory protein-1), CD98, Tim-3, and granzyme B in CD56bright NK cells from COVID-19 patients, as well as CD98, Tim-3, NKG2C, MIP-1, and CD62L, among other markers, in CD56dim NK cells (Fig. 2, C and D, and fig. S2, C and D). In line with the ac-tivation profile (Fig. 1, E and F), PCA did not highlight an obvious separation between moderate and severe COVID-19 patients (Fig. 2B), and similar results were obtained when unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using expression of all studied phenotypic markers within CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells (Fig. 2, E and F). The clustering distinguished healthy controls from COVID-19 patients. Last, the phenotypes of responding (Ki-67 positive) compared with nonresponding (Ki-67 negative) NK cells were compared. This analy-sis revealed that responding CD56bright NK cells coexpressed higher levels of granzyme B, CD25, HLA-DR, and Ksp37 when compared with nonresponding cells and that responding CD56dim NK cells expressed higher levels of Tim-3 and HLA-DR (fig. S2E).
The activated status of NK cells was also confirmed in BAL from COVID-19 patients by analysis of publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data (Fig. 2, G and H, and fig. S2F) (24). Clustering of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in moderate and severe patients followed by gene ontology enrichment analysis of DEGs revealed six distinct gene modules where effector func-tions/chemotaxis, activation/proliferation, and interferon response were enriched in patients compared with controls (Fig. 2I; fig. S2, G and H; and table S4). The interferon response and activation/prolif-eration signatures were most highly enriched in BAL NK cells from patients with moderate disease, whereas severe patients had a higher effector function gene signature (Fig. 2I and fig. S2, G and H). Gene set enrichment analysis further highlighted NK cells from BAL fluid of severe patients to display an activated and inflamed profile (Fig. 2J and fig. S2I). Last, several of the proteins that were increased in peripheral blood NK cells from COVID-19 patients (Fig. 2, C to F, and fig. S2, C and D) were also identified as DEGs in BAL NK cells of COVID-19 patients as compared with controls, including GZMB (granzyme B), PRF1 (perforin), HAVCR2 (Tim-3), and CCL4 (MIP-1) (Fig. 2K). In summary, peripheral blood CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells displayed an activated effector phenotype that is similar in nature in moderate and severe COVID-19 disease and that could be corroborated by analysis of NK cells from BAL fluid of COVID-19 patients.
Impact of KIR expression and NK cell education on the NK cell COVID-19 responseCD56dim NK cell function is regulated by inhibitory receptors. Sub-sets of these cells expressing inhibitory receptors in the presence of self-HLA class I ligands are educated and thus more functional (28, 29). We next evaluated the impact of expression of inhibitory KIRs (killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors) and NKG2A as well as of NK cell education on the acute COVID-19 response (fig. S3A and table S5). No significant differences were found in the frac-tions of NK cells expressing different combinations of inhibitory
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
3 of 14
AStudy design Experiments High-dimensional
data processing
Severe
Moderate
Healthy
Inclusion:
-SARS-CoV-2 PCR+-18–78 years old-5–24 days of symptoms-0–8 days since admittance-Severe: ICU treatment-Moderate: Regular ward
Exclusion: -Malignancy-Immunomodulatory tx
(n = 17)
(n = 10)
(n = 17)
-Education-Adaptive expansions
NK cell phenotyping(28-color flow):-Differentiation-Activation
Conventional analysis:
Unsupervised analysis:
B
0
10
20
30
40
%N
Kce
lls o
fC
D19
-neg
lym
phoc
ytes
0
10
20
30
%C
D56
brig
htN
Kce
llsof
tota
l Nk
cells
NK
cells
/ml
****
DControl COVID-19
Ki-67 Ki-67
CD
38
CD
38
CD
56br
ight
NK
cells
/ml
***
CD
56di
mN
Kce
lls/m
l
****
CD
38
HLA-DR
20.3
HLA-DR
Control COVID-19 Control COVID-193.3 20.6
0,62
1.78
CD
56
CD
56
CD
38
CD
38
CD69 CD69
0
50
100
%C
D56
dim
NK
cells
of to
tal N
K c
ells
HLA DR
0,62
CD
56
0.6
020406080
100
% P
ositi
ve c
ells *** *****
020406080
100
% P
ositi
ve c
ells
**
020406080
100
% P
ositi
ve c
ells ***** ***
CD62L+CD62L−
Ki-67 HLA-DR CD69
CD57+CD57−
Ki-67 HLA-DR CD69Ki-67 HLA-DR CD69
NKG2A+NKG2A−
FE
G HCon
trols
Modera
te
Severe
0
20
40
60
80
%K
i-67+
CD
56br
ight
NK
cel
ls
*****
Modera
te
Severe
0
20
40
60
80
%C
D69
+C
D56
brig
htN
K c
ells
******
Modera
te
Severe
0
20
40
60
80
%H
LA-D
R+
CD
56br
ight
NK
cel
ls
*****
Modera
te
Severe
0
20
40
60
%K
i-67+
CD
56di
mN
K c
ells
******
Modera
te
Severe
0
5
10
15
20
25
%H
LA-D
R+
CD
56di
mN
Kce
lls
***
Modera
te
Severe
020406080
100
%C
D69
+C
D56
dim
NK
cel
ls
******
Contro
ls
Contro
ls
Contro
ls
Contro
ls
Contro
ls
74.474.436.5
2020-04-09
2020-04-19
2020-04-29
2020-05-09
2020-05-19
2020-05-29
2020-06-08
Severity at samplingViremia at sampling
AgeSexBMI
Peak oxygen needOutcome
NoYoung
Mod. Severe
OldYes
Male FemaleLow HighNo O2
Mech. vent.ECMO
High flow10–15 liters/min
0–10 liters/minAlive Deceased
Cont. oxygen need
Symptom debutHospital admissionSARS-CoV-2 PCR+Blood samplingICU admissionICU dischargeICU intubationICU extubationClinical data collection
C
Discharge/death
2020-06-18
Proximity extensionAssay: 276 soluble factors
scRNA-seq analysisof BAL NK cells
Pregated on CD56dim NK cells
22.946.525.4
CD56 NKG2CCD57
NK
G2A
CD
57
CD
62L
0
2 105
4 105
6 105
8 105
0
1 104
2 104
3 104
4 104
0
2 105
4 105
6 105
8 105
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
Fig. 1. NK cells are robustly activated in moderate and severe COVID-19 disease. (A) Schematic overview of study design, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. (B) Swim-mer plot of symptom debut, hospital admission, and blood sampling in relation to other main clinical events and clinical characteristics. (C) Percentages and absolute counts of NK cells and NK cell subsets for healthy controls (n = 17), moderate COVID-19 patients (n = 10), and severe COVID-19 patients (n = 15 to 16). (D) Flow cytometry plots of Ki-67, HLA-DR, and CD69 expression on NK cells in one healthy control and one COVID-19 patient. (E and F) Summary data for expression of the indicated markers in (E) CD56bright and (F) CD56dim NK cells in healthy controls, moderate COVID-19 patients, and severe COVID-19 patients. (G) Flow cytometry plots of NKG2A, CD57, and CD62L expression on CD56dim NK cells. (H) Summary data for Ki-67, HLA-DR, and CD69 expression within NKG2A+/−, CD57+/−, or CD62L+/− CD56dim NK cells from all mod-erate and severe COVID-19 patients (n = 24 to 26). In (C) and (E), Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test; in (H), Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Numbers in flow cytometry plots indicate percentage, and bars represent median (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
4 of 14
KIRs and NKG2A in COVID-19 patients as compared with controls (fig. S3B). Furthermore, the size of CD56dim NK cell subsets educated via KIRs or NKG2A was also similar in pa-tients and controls (fig. S3C). Last, we assessed the NK cell response by measuring Ki-67 up-regulation in CD56dim NK cell subsets, either solely based on KIR and NKG2A expression or also by integrating inform-ation on major histocompati-bility complex (MHC) class I ligand haplotypes (fig. S3, D to F). This comparison indicated that the NK cell response in acute COVID-19 occurred inde-pendently of inhibitory KIR expression and NK cell education status.
Increased frequency of adaptive NK cells in severe COVID-19Our analyses so far revealed robust activation of NK cells with an effector phenotype in COVID-19 patients. The response appeared
largely independent of disease severity because few differences were observed when comparing moderate and severe patients. However, we noticed that severe patients had increased frequencies of NKG2C+ NK cells (fig. S2D). This indicated an increased frequency of adaptive NK cells, which are often associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and can expand when CMV-seropositive patients undergo other severe acute viral infections (13, 30, 31). Adaptive NK cells are characterized by a terminally differentiated phenotypic
A B
C D
E F
Control Moderate Severe
CD56dim NK cells
Gra
nzym
e B
expr
essi
on (M
FI)Con
trols
Modera
te
Severe
0500
1000150020002500
*
***
Per
forin
exp
ress
ion
(MFI
)C
D98
exp
ress
ion
(MFI
)
Ksp3
7 ex
pres
sion
(%)
MIP
-1β
expr
essi
on (M
FI)
Tim
-3 e
xpre
ssio
n (%
)
CD56dim NK cells
NK
G2C
(%)
KIR
2DL2
/L3/
S2
(%)
KIR
3DL1
(%)
Ksp
37 (M
FI)
Ksp
37 (%
)C
D57
(%)
KIR
2DL1
(%)
CD
38 (M
FI)
CD
38 (%
)TI
GIT
(MFI
)C
D62
L (%
)N
KG
2A (%
)N
KG
2D (M
FI)
HLA
-DR
(%)
Per
forin
(MFI
)G
ranz
yme
B (M
FI)
CD
25 (%
)C
D69
(%)
Tim
-3 (%
)C
D25
(MFI
)C
D98
(MFI
)M
IP-1β
(MFI
)
ControlsModerateSevere
CD56bright NK cells
NK
G2D
(MFI
)C
D62
L (%
)N
KG
2C (%
)H
LA-D
R (%
)C
D16
(%)
Ksp
37 (M
FI)
Ksp
37 (%
)P
erfo
rin (%
)P
erfo
rin (M
FI)
CD
69 (%
)TI
GIT
(MFI
)Ti
m-3
(%)
CD
38 (M
FI)
CD
38 (%
)G
ranz
yme
B (M
FI)
CD
25 (%
)C
D25
(MFI
)M
IP-1β
(MFI
)C
D98
(MFI
)G
ranz
yme
B (%
)
0
1
3
Fold
cha
nge
ControlsModerateSevere
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0
2000
4000
6000
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0100200300400500 ***
***
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0
100
200
300
400
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0
5
10
15
20 ******
Gra
nzym
e B
expr
essi
on (M
FI)
Perfo
rin e
xpre
ssio
n (M
FI)
CD
98 e
xpre
ssio
n (M
FI)
TIG
IT e
xpre
ssio
n (M
FI)
Ksp3
7 ex
pres
sion
(%)
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0
25
50
75
100
Tim
-3 e
xpre
ssio
n (%
)
CD56bright NK cells
CD98CD98 Ksp37K 37 PerforinP f i Granzyme BG B KIR2DL1KIR2DL1 KIR3DL1KIR3DL1
MIP-1β CD38 CD16 NKG2DCD25 KIR2DL2/S2/L3
Dim
ensi
on 2
(15.
8%)
5.0
2.5
0.0
−2.5
−5.0−4.0 −2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0
Dimension 1 (39.1%)
Dim
ensi
on 2
(16.
2%) 4.0
2.0
−2.0
−4.0
0.0
−4.0 −2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0Dimension 1 (27.6 %)
Controls
Moderate
Severe
−2
0
2
−2 0 2UMAP 1
UM
AP
2
G
I
(1) Effector function/chemotaxis
(2) Activation/proliferation
(3) Metabolism/degranulation
(4) Interferonresponse
(5) Mitochondrialactivity
(6) Translation/RNA metabolism
−0.50−0.250.000.250.50
Z score
Detection0.40.60.8
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
Controls Moderate Severe
J
−6
−3
0
3
6
Z-s
core
−Log10(P)246
8
ModerateSevere
CD56bri
ght N
K
Transit
ional
NK
Active
NK
Adapti
ve N
K
Mature
NK
Termina
l NK
Inflam
ed N
K
K
Liao et al. (24)
821 lung NK cells obtained
scRNA-seq of lung NK cells extracted(control, n = 3; moderate, n = 3; severe, n = 6)
Residual CD8 T cells filtered out(human cell atlas PBMC benchmarking)
UMAP, DEGs, GO enrichment, GSEA
H
02468
10
GZMA02468
10
GZMB02468
10
PRF102468
10
HAVCR2
02468
10
CCL302468
10
CCL402468
10
CCL502468
10
LAG3
Log-
norm
aliz
ed c
ount
s
Controls Moderate Severe
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
020406080
100 *
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0200400600800
1000**
*
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0100200300400500
******
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0
10
20
30
40***
***
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0
1000
2000
3000
4000**
***
0.5
1
2
Fold
cha
nge
Fig. 2. Detailed analysis of NK cell activation in COVID-19 disease. (A) Ex-pression of indicated proteins on CD56dim NK cells. (B) PCA of the protein expression phenotype of CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells in healthy con-trols, moderate COVID-19 patients, and severe COVID-19 patients. (C) Expression of indicated proteins on CD56bright NK cells in healthy controls (n = 17), mode-rate COVID-19 patients (n = 10), and severe COVID-19 patients (n = 15). All flow cytometry measurements, in-cluding cytokines (MIP-1 and IFN-), were performed directly ex vivo with-out further stimulation. (D) Expression of indicated proteins on CD56dim NK cells in healthy controls (n = 17), mode-rate COVID-19 patients (n = 10), and severe COVID-19 patients (n = 16). (E and F) Hierarchical clustering heat-maps showing expression of indicated proteins compared with median of healthy controls in (E) CD56bright and (F) CD56dim NK cells. (G) Strategy for scRNA-seq analysis of BAL NK cells from controls and COVID-19 patients. (H) UMAP of scRNA-seq data for BAL NK cells from the indicated groups. (I) Heatmap of indicated gene clusters after gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis on DEGs. (J) Z scores of NK cell gene sets after gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). (K) Violin plots of indicated DEGs. In (C) and (D), Kruskal- Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test; bars repre-sent median (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
5 of 14
signature, and the vast majority of them coexpresses NKG2C and CD57 (30). In severe, but not in moderate COVID-19 patients, we detected higher frequencies of NKG2C+CD57+ CD56dim NK cells, as compared with healthy controls (Fig. 3, A and B). Moreover, although the absolute number of NKG2C−CD57− cells decreased in COVID-19 patients, NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells remained stable even in patients with severe disease (Fig. 3, C and D). A deeper pheno-typic analysis of NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells, as compared with their NKG2C−CD57− counterparts, highlighted the modulation of sever-al maturation and activation-related markers, for instance, NKG2A and CD38 (Fig. 3E and fig. S4A). By applying an arbitrary threshold based on the percentage of NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells over the CD56dim population (here set to >5%; fig. S4B), we were able to identify patients where NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells displayed a pheno-typic pattern largely overlapping with that observed in adaptive NK cells (Fig. 3E) (30, 32). The expansion of adaptive NK cells was confined to CMV-seropositive individuals (Fig. 3F and table S5). Our strategy to identify expansions in the smaller healthy control group showed good correspondence with a previous study assessing similar expansions in a large cohort of more than 150 healthy individuals (Fig. 3G) (30). About two-thirds of CMV- seropositive severe COVID-19 patients had such an expanded adaptive NK cell population compared with one-third in controls and even fewer in the moderate COVID-19 patients (Fig. 3, F and G, and fig. S4C). Thirteen of 16 severe COVID-19 patients were nega-tive for CMV DNA in serum (table S5), indicating that the increased proportion of adaptive NK cells in severe patients did not depend on CMV reactivation secondary to COVID-19. In line with this hypothesis, neither the percentage nor absolute counts or the frac-tion of proliferating NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells showed any cor-relation with CMV IgG levels detected in patient sera (fig. S4D and table S5). The clinical picture was similar in severe patients with and without adaptive NK cell expansions (fig. S4, E and F, and tables S6 and S7).
NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells found in COVID-19 patients dis-played signs of proliferation, although at lower levels compared with NKG2C−CD57− NK cells (Fig. 3, H and I, and fig. S4, H to J). Responding NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells expressed higher levels of HLA-DR, CD38, CD62L, and MIP-1 but showed lower ex-pression of NKG2A, NKG2D, TIGIT, and CD25 as compared with nonresponding NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells (Fig. 3J and fig. S4K). Next, we set out to more specifically address what was driving the emergence of adaptive NK cell expansions. Reanalysis of published scRNA-seq data revealed that both immune and nonimmune cell types displayed up-regulated expression of genes encoding HLA-E and HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C in BAL fluid of moderate and severe COVID-19 patients as compared with controls (Fig. 3K and fig. S4L). The number of NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells was inversely correlated with several soluble factors, including lymphotoxin- alpha (LT-), IL-12, interferon- (IFN-), and amphiregulin (Fig. 3L). However, when specifically comparing soluble factors in severe patients with and without expansions, only a limited number of factors were differentially expressed (fig. S4M). In line with this, associations between phenotypic features and soluble factors were, in most cases, similar for adaptive and nonadaptive NK cells (fig. S4N). Together, severe, but not moderate, COVID-19 disease is associated with higher frequencies of adaptive NK cells that display signs of proliferation and activation without detectable concurrent CMV reactivation.
Dimensionality reduction analysis of NK cells separates severe from moderate patientsExcept for adaptive NK cell expansions being more prevalent in severe COVID-19 patients, manual gating–based flow cytometry analysis did not identify features specific to either moderate or se-vere COVID-19 patients. In an additional attempt to identify such features through an unsupervised approach, we performed uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) analysis on all patients and controls (Fig. 4, A and B, and fig. S5). This revealed distinct topological regions between patients and controls (Fig. 4A). We applied PhenoGraph to our samples to further describe NK cell subpopulations and to quantify differences in their relative abun-dance between COVID-19 patient groups. PhenoGraph clustering identified 36 distinct clusters (Fig. 4C). About half of these clusters were equally shared between controls and moderate and severe patients (Fig. 4D), and some clusters were patient specific. Further-more, this analysis also revealed clusters that contained NK cells predominantly from controls, moderate COVID-19 patients, or severe COVID-19 patients (Fig. 4, C and D). The phenotype of NK cells in clusters with similar relative abundance across the three groups was homogenous, but greater differences were observed when assessing clusters uniquely and significantly enriched in moderate or severe patients (Fig. 4, E and F, and fig. S5D).
Next, each PhenoGraph cluster was stratified within patients on the basis of six clinical categorical parameters (viremia, serocon-version, oxygen need, steroid treatment, underlying comorbidities, and outcome) (Fig. 4G) in the same manner as moderate and severe patient categories were defined (Materials and Methods). Here, most clusters showed a significantly different relative abundance between patient categories and healthy controls in at least one of the clinical parameter–defined patient groups (Fig. 4G, fig. S6A, and table S8). For some clusters, the relative abundances were different depending on the clinical parameter. This approach was critical for our understanding, because it enabled us to step away from looking at disease severity on the whole and to instead look into the defining clinical parameters separately. For example, cluster 21 with high CD25 and CD98 expression (Fig. 4H) was almost completely absent from patients who were on mechanical ventilation and the ones who died from COVID-19. Conversely, CD69-expressing cluster 22 and the four most highly Ki-67–expressing clusters accounted for a similar percentage across all patient categories in our dataset (Fig. 4H and fig. S6, B to F). Hierarchical clustering of PhenoGraph clusters’ relative abundance across clinical categorical parameters revealed the presence of two “immunotypes” in patients. One of these contained categorical parameters attributed to milder disease course, and the other one was enriched for viremia, chronic under-lying diseases, steroid treatment, mechanical ventilation, and fatal outcome (Fig. 4I). A similar clustering was obtained when moder-ate and severe disease status was included (fig. S6G). Last, the NK cell phenotypes associated with moderate (immunotype 1) versus severe (immunotype 2) disease were assessed. This revealed up- regulated MIP-1, CD98, and TIGIT in the moderate immunotype and conversely high expression of perforin, NKG2C, and Ksp37 in the severe immunotype, whereas the activation markers Ki-67 and CD69 remained unchanged (Fig. 4J). High perforin, NKG2C, and Ksp37 are features of adaptive NK cell expansions that were also associated with severe disease (Fig. 3). In summary, unsupervised high-dimensional analysis of the NK cell response in COVID-19 disentangles NK cell phenotypes associated with disease severity.
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
6 of 14
NKG2C
CD
57
Control Moderate Severe-2
0.89 0.37 56.6
CMV−CMV+ No expansion
CMV+ exp.
Severe-1
14.0
Con
trol
CO
VID
-19
8.61
17.3
1.9
2.7
Ki-67
Adap
tive
Non
adap
tive
Adap
tive
Non
adap
tive
2 4 6 8 10101
102
103
104
105
106 P = 0.0067r = 0.5279
2 3 4 5 6101
102
103
104
105
106 P = 0.001r = −0.614
0 5 10 15101
102
103
104
105
106 P = 0.003r = −0.565
0 1 2 3 4101
102
103
104
105
106 P = 0.003r = −0.564
NK
G2C
+ CD
57+ C
D56
dim
NK
cel
ls/m
l
NK
G2C
+ CD
57+
CD
56di
m
NK
cel
ls/m
l
NK
G2C
+ CD
57+ C
D56
dim
NK
cel
ls/m
l
NK
G2C
+ CD
57+ C
D56
dim
NK
cel
l cou
nt/m
l
AREG (NPX) IFN- (NPX) IL-12 (NPX)LT- (NPX)
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
020406080
100
Perc
enta
ge
Contro
ls (th
is stu
dy)
Contro
ls [B
éziat
et a
l.
(30); n
= 15
1]
Severe
020406080
100
Perc
enta
ge
0.1089*
Expa
nsio
nN
o ex
pans
ion
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
0
20
40
60
%N
KG2C
+ CD
57+
CD
56di
mN
K ce
lls
0.1051**
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
103
104
105
106
NKG
2C− C
D57
− C
D56
dim
NK
cells
/ml
ns****
Contro
ls
Modera
te
Severe
101102103104105106
NKG
2C+ C
D57
+ C
D56
dim
NK
cells
/ml
nsns
ns
No
expa
nsio
nEx
pans
ion
Con
trorrl
CO
VID
-19
Con
trorrl
CO
VID
-19
CD57−NKG2C− CD56dimNKG2C+CD57+ CD56dim
NKG2A KIR2DL1 KIR3DL1 KIR2DL2L3S2 CD38
Controls COVID-190
20
40
60
Ki-6
7+ c
ells
(%)
NKG2C+CD57+ CD56dim NK cells
NKG2C−CD57− CD56dim NK cells
**
**
-4
-2Row
z s
core 0
2
ControlsModerateSevere
Ki-67+
Ki-67−
GzmB (%)
TIM3 (%)
Ksp37 (%)CD69 (%)
CXCR6 (%)
CD38 (%)****MIP1b (MFI)****
HLA-DR (%)****
CD62L (%)**
CD98 (%)****PERF (%)**
NKG2D (MFI)**
KLRG1 (MFI)****
TIGIT (MFI)**
CD25 (%)***NKG2A (%)*
0
2
4
6
8
Macrophages0
2
4
6
B cells
0
2
4
6
mDCs0
2
4
6
NK cells0
2
4
6
8
T cells
Controrr ls Moderarr te Severerr
0
2
4
6
8
Epithelial
HLA
-E e
xpre
ssio
n (lo
g-no
rmal
ized
cou
nts)
**** ************** **** ****
**** ****
********
ns****
**** ****
************
C
G HF
D E
BA
I
J K
LFig. 3. Increase in adaptive NK cells in severe COVID-19 disease. (A) CD57 and NKG2C expression on CD56dim NK cells in indicated experimental groups. (B) Percentage of NKG2C+CD57+ cells in CMV-seropositive controls (n = 11), moderate COVID-19 patients (n = 8), and severe COVID-19 patients (n = 15). (C and D) Absolute counts of the indicated subsets in controls (n = 17), moder-ate COVID-19 patients (n = 10), and severe COVID-19 patients (n = 16). Squares and circles represent individuals with and without NK cell adaptive expansions,
respectively. (E) Representative histograms of the indicated protein expression in NKG2C+CD57+ and NKG2C−CD57− CD56dim NK cells. (F and G) Individuals from the indi-cated groups having or not having adaptive NK cell expansions. (H and I) Representative plots and summary data for Ki-67 expression in NKG2C+CD57+ and NKG2C−CD57− CD56dim NK cells in controls (n = 17) and COVID-19 patients (n = 26). (J) Expression z score of indicated proteins in NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells from controls (n = 10) and COVID-19 patients (n = 17). Red boxes highlight the markers with significantly different expression in the Ki-67+ or Ki-67− fraction. (K) HLA-E expression from scRNA-seq data of the indicated cell types. (L) Spearman correlation between NKG2C+CD57+ CD56dim NK cell numbers and the indicated soluble factors in COVID-19 patients. In (B) to (D), Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test; in (F) and (G), Fisher’s exact test; in (I) to (J), Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test; in (K), pairwise comparisons (see Materials and Methods). Bars represent median (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001). ns, not significant.
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
7 of 14
C16
C2
C21
C22
C23
C24
C26
C27
C29
C30
C31
C32
C36
C7
C9
No viremiaViremia
SARS-CoV-2 IgG neg
SARS-CoV-2 IgG pos
Low oxygen
High oxygen
Mechanical ventilation
No steroid treatment
Steroid treatment
No chronic disease
Chronic disease
Discharged
Deceased
Phe
noG
raph
clu
ster
Cluster percentage
0255075
AllA
Controls
Moderate Severe
UM
AP
-2
UMAP-1
Moderate Severe
UMAP 1
PatientsB
2-P
AM
U
UMAP-1
Granzyme B Perforin Ksp37 MIP-1ß CD38 HLA-DR
Ki-67 CD98 CD69 CD25 TIGIT Tim-3
CD57 CD62L NKG2A NKG2C KLRG1 NKG2D
C
Expression HighLow
65D
C61
DC
75D
Cnirofre
PB e
myznarG
73psK
3-miT
1G
RLK
TIGIT
89D
CR
D-AL
H96
DC
1-PI
Mβ 52
DC
6R
CX
C-
NFIγ D2
GK
N76-i
KC2
GK
NL26
DC
A2G
KN
1LD2
RIK
1LD3
RIK
3L2S2L
D2RI
K
C10C4
C13C33
C1C11C19C18C35
C6C8
C23C3
C25C5
C36C7
C28C22C24C21C15
C9C34C27C29C32C12C20C17C26C14
C2C30C16C31
F
Low
High
E
CD38 CD69 MIP-1ß CD98 TIGIT HLA-DR
C7C9
C23C36
C2C16C30C31
0
25
50
75
100
Moderate
ClusterC1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15C16C17C18C19C20C21C22C23C24C25C26C27C28C29C30C31C32C33C34C35C36
D
Controls Moderate Severe
ytireves esaesi d f o %
r et sul c ni htiw puor g
C10 C4C13 C33 C1
C11 C19 C18 C35 C6 C8C23 C3
C25 C5C36 C7
C28 C22 C24 C21 C15 C9C34 C27 C29 C32 C12 C20 C17 C26 C14 C2
C30 C16 C310
20
40
60
80
100
Controls Severe
Per
cent
age
of a
Phe
noG
raph
clu
ster
out
of t
otal
G H
UMAP-1
UM
AP
-2
Ki-67
26
27 29
32 C26C27
C29C32
C21
21
CD25 CD98
HLA-DR
22
Ki 67
C22
CD69
C26C27
C29C32
C21
C22
C26C27
C29C32
C21
C22
CD25 CD98
I
C2C16C30C21C31C13C33C4C10C24C22C27C29C32C20C17C26C14C34C12C1C18C8C35C36C3C15C7C9C6C28C25C19C23C5C11
−4
−2
0
2
4
Virem
ia
Chron
ic dis
ease
Stero
id tre
atm
ent
Mecha
nical
venti
lation
Decea
sed
No ch
ronic
dise
ase
SARS-CoV
-2 Ig
G pos
No vir
emia
Low ox
ygen
High ox
ygen
Discha
rged
SARS-CoV
-2 Ig
G neg
No ste
roids
Perforin NKG2C Ksp37 CD98 TIGIT Ki-67 CD69MIP-1ß
Immunotype 2
Immunotype 1
Immunotype 1Immunotype 2
J
Col
umn
z sc
ore
Exp
ress
ion
(col
umn
z sc
ore)
P ≤ 0.05
P value
ns
Fig. 4. Automated analysis of NK cells in COVID-19 identifies putative NK immunotypes differentially enriched in two main groups of patients. (A) UMAP of all events, of controls and patients, and of patients split into moderate and severe. (B) Representative expression of phenotypic markers on all cells in the UMAP. (C) Percent-age of 36 PhenoGraph clusters within total cells of indicated groups. (D) Relative abundance of control, moderate, and severe groups within each PhenoGraph cluster. (E) Expression of selected markers from representative PhenoGraph clusters that did not display significant differential relative abundance between healthy, moderate, and severe groups (top) and significant clusters that were most highly abundant in severe COVID-19 patients (bottom). (F) Expression of phenotypic markers across PhenoGraph clusters (as column z score of median expression values). (G) Percentage of NK cell clusters from COVID-19 patients stratified according to the indicated clinical categorical parameters. Purple circles with a border indicate significant PhenoGraph clusters in a particular comparison (P ≤ 0.05), and light gray circles without a border indicate nonsignificant clusters (Materials and Methods and table S8). Vertical lines indicate separate comparisons. (H) Selected PhenoGraph clusters overlaid on the UMAP and representative flow cytometry histograms showing expression of the indicated markers within the clusters. (I) Hierarchical clustering of PhenoGraph clus-ters and clinical categorical parameters. The heatmap was calculated as column z score of cluster percentages. Putative NK immunotypes are indicated. (J) Expression of separating and nonseparating markers within the NK cell immunotype 1 and 2 clusters.
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
8 of 14
CD56bright NK cell arming is associated with disease severityLast, we performed a more detailed analysis of the NK cell response in relation to clinical laboratory parameters and clinical scoring sys-tems. PCA of moderate and severe patients based on clinical laboratory parameters revealed separation between the two groups (Fig. 5A). This was primarily driven by high systemic levels of neutrophils, IL-6, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein, clinical laboratory data typ-ically associated with severe disease (Fig. 5B). Out of the altered NK cell phenotypic parameters (Fig. 2 and fig. S2), the expression levels of perforin and granzyme B in CD56bright NK cells correlated with IL-6 levels in the patients (Fig. 5C). Perforin in CD56bright NK cells in the COVID-19 patients also positively correlated with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and SOFA-R scores as well as neu-trophil count and negatively with PaO2/FiO2 ratio (Fig. 5D). Similarly, patients with ongoing SARS-CoV-2 viremia in serum also presented with higher CD56bright NK cell perforin expression, and these viremic patients had more severe disease (fig. S7A). The up-regulation of perforin and granzyme B on CD56bright NK cells (Fig. 2) was further positively associated with a general activation and up-regulation of effector molecules within CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells and in-versely correlated with expression of the inhibitory checkpoint mol-ecule TIGIT (Fig. 5E and fig. S7, B and C). Hence, the association with high perforin was in line with the severe immunotype identified through unsupervised high-dimensional analysis (Fig. 4). Thus, inte-gration of clinical laboratory parameters into phenotypical NK cell analysis revealed that arming of CD56bright cells with cytotoxic molecules correlated with parameters associated with a severe disease course.
Protein-protein interaction network driving CD56bright NK cell arming in COVID-19To better understand the significance of the activated CD56bright NK cell phenotype and its association with disease severity, we took advantage of an extensive characterization of soluble serum pro-teins that had been performed on the same 27 patients through the Karolinska COVID-19 Immune Atlas effort. Of the 276 quantified soluble factors, the concentrations of 58 were significantly associated with perforin and granzyme B expression on CD56bright cells and 9 showed strong, primarily positive, correlations (fig. S7D). To gain insight into the biological basis of the peripheral protein signature that correlated with CD56bright NK cell activation, we analyzed protein-protein interaction networks. We identified 337 interactions (table S9) that were integrated into a network of 959 elements (nodes; Fig. 5F and table S10). Many of these related to viral infec-tions, suggesting redundancy between different viral infections in the NK cell activation mode (Fig. 5G and table S11). In addition, several distinct signaling pathways potentially involved in driving the CD56bright NK cell response in COVID-19 together with the sol-uble factors were identified (Fig. 5H, fig. S7F, and table S11). This included nuclear factor B (NF-B), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)–Akt, and FoxO signaling (Fig. 5H). Together, our findings indicate that NK activation pathways could be shared with other viral infections, connecting NK cell–specific phenotypic traits to compo-nents of the systemic inflammatory milieu related to COVID-19 disease pathogenesis.
DISCUSSIONUsing high-dimensional flow cytometry, integration of soluble factor analysis, and complementing with the analysis of publicly available
scRNA-seq data, we here characterized the host NK cell response toward SARS-CoV-2 infection in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients in the circulation. Results revealed low NK cell numbers but a robustly activated NK cell phenotype in COVID-19 patients. Peripheral blood NK cell activation states were mirrored in tran-scriptional signatures of BAL NK cells of COVID-19 patients from another cohort (24). Unsupervised high-dimensional analysis fur-thermore revealed clusters of NK cells that were linked to the disease status. Last, severe hyperinflammation, defined by clinical parameters, was associated with a high presence of adaptive NK cell expansions and arming of CD56bright NK cells. These systemic immune changes were linked to a soluble factor protein interaction network displaying a canonical viral activation signature and distinct signaling pathways. Together, the results provide a comprehensive map of the landscape of NK cell responses in SARS-CoV-2–infected COVID-19 patients at early stages of disease and yield insights into host responses to-ward viral infections and associated disease pathology.
NK cells are known to rapidly respond during diverse acute viral infections in humans including those caused by dengue virus, hanta-virus, tick-borne encephalitis virus, and yellow fever virus (13–15, 33). Although a similarly detailed analysis of NK cells has not been per-formed in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection causing COVID-19, early reports from the pandemic have indicated low circulating NK cell numbers in patients with moderate and severe disease (20, 21, 23). Those reports are in line with what is reported here. Transiently reduced NK cell numbers during the acute phase of infections have also been shown in SARS-CoV-1 infection (34) and in acute hanta-virus infection (13). The magnitude of the present detected NK cell response, with a quarter of the circulating cells either displaying signs of proliferation or activation, mirrors the responses observed during acute dengue fever and in acute hantavirus infection (13, 14). The present in-depth phenotypic assessment of NK cells in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients revealed an activated phenotype with up-regulated levels of effector molecules and chemokines, activating receptors, and nutrient receptors. We also observed signs of inhibi-tory immune checkpoint receptor up-regulation through increased levels of TIGIT and Tim-3. Hence, the present results confirm and extend, at protein level, what was recently reported for peripheral blood NK cells using scRNA-seq (20).
Human NK cells are enriched in the lung compared with peripheral blood (18, 19). COVID-19 patients display significant immune acti-vation in the respiratory tract, where moderate disease is associated with a high number of T cells and NK cells, whereas neutrophils and inflammatory monocytes are enriched at these sites in patients with severe disease (24, 25, 35). By analyzing publicly available scRNA-seq data on BAL NK cells from COVID-19 patients (24), we found these cells to be strongly activated. The interferon response appeared stronger in BAL NK cells from moderate COVID-19 patients. This is in line with severe COVID-19 associating with a blunted interferon response (6). We further confirmed that a similarly activated pheno-type of NK cells was present in BAL fluid, as was observed in peripheral blood, including high expression of effector molecules and chemokines. NK cell homing to the site of infection is important for pathogen clearance in murine models, where several chemokine receptors have been shown to mediate NK cell tissue homing (36–39). The reduced numbers of NK cells that we observed in circulation might, to some extent, reflect a redistribution to the lung. Chemo-taxis was another gene ontology module that, together with cytotoxicity, was enriched in BAL NK cells of severe COVID-19 patients. In
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
9 of 14
addition, BAL fluid from COVID-19 patients contains elevated levels of chemokines that potentially could attract NK cells, including CCL3, CCL3L1, CCL4, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 (24). Future work should dissect NK cell trafficking to the lung in COVID-19 in more detail and in relation to COVID-19 disease severity. To this end, indirect and related findings suggest that NK cells may have a role in the early host immune response toward SARS-CoV-2 at the site of infection.
This is the first time an increase in adaptive NK cells is described in COVID-19 patients. This feature was almost exclusively found in SARS-CoV-2–infected patients with severe disease. The percentage
of adaptive NK cell expansions in the present healthy control cohort was comparable to previous findings on larger healthy CMV- seropositive human cohorts (30, 40), strengthening our observations in COVID-19 patients. The lack of any correlation between the emergence of adaptive NK cell expansions and CMV IgG titers as well as the occurrence of CMV reactivation due to possible COVID-19–induced immune dysfunction is noteworthy, as adap-tive NK cell expansions have been shown to associate with CMV antiviral immunity (32, 40). The absence of an ongoing CMV-directed immune response is further corroborated by the lack of prolifera-tion observed in CMV-specific CD8+ T cells in acute COVID-19
A B
D
Dimension 1 (42.2%)
Dim
ensi
on 2
(17.
5%)
2
1
0
−1
−2
20−2
Moderate SevereClinical laboratory parameters
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Fac
tors
con
trib
utin
g to
di
men
sion
1Neu
troph
ils
Leuk
ocyte
sIL-
6
D-dimer
C-reac
tive p
rotein
Ferritin
Bilirub
in
Creatin
ine
2 4 6 8 100
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
IL-6 (NPX)
Perfo
rin (M
FI) o
nC
D56
brig
ht N
K c
ells
R = 0.62P = 0.001
2 4 6 8 100
1000
2000
3000
4000
IL-6 (NPX)
Gra
nzym
e B
(MFI
) on
CD
56br
ight
NK
cel
ls
R = 0.62P = 0.001
C
NK cell c
ount
NK cell f
reque
ncy
CD98 (M
FI)
Perfori
n (MFI)
Granzy
me B (M
FI)
NKG2D (M
FI)
CD38 (M
FI)
MIP-1β
(MFI)
TIGIT (M
FI)
CD25 (M
FI)
Ksp37
(MFI)
CD25 (%
)
Granzy
me B (%
)
HLA-D
R (%)
Ki-67 (
%)
Ksp37
(%)
Perfori
n (%)
Tim-3
(%)
Perforin (MFI, CD56bright)
Granzyme B (MFI, CD56bright)
CD56bright NK cells
CD98 (M
FI)
Perfori
n (MFI)
Granzy
me B (M
FI)
NKG2D (M
FI)
CD38 (M
FI)
MIP-1β
(MFI)
TIGIT (M
FI)
Ksp37
(MFI)
CD25 (%
)
CD57 (%
)
CD62L (
%)
CD69 (%
)
HLA-D
R (%)
Ki-67 (
%)
Ksp37
(%)
NKG2A (%
)
NKG2C (%
)
Tim-3
(%)
Perforin (MFI, CD56bright)
Granzyme B (MFI, CD56bright)
CD56dim NK cells
−1
0
1
Spe
arm
an c
orre
latio
n
*** *** ** **
*** **
** *** ** ** *** **
** ***
0 5 10 150
5001000150020002500
SOFA score
Perfo
rin (M
FI)
0 1 2 3 4 50
20406080
100
SOFA-R score
Perfo
rin (%
)
0 200 400 6000
20406080
100
PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg)
Perfo
rin (%
)
R = 0.42P = 0.03
R = 0.45P = 0.02
R = −0.47P = 0.02
E
0 5 10 15 200
5001000150020002500
Neutrophils (×109/liter)
Perfo
rin (M
FI) R = 0.51
P = 0.01
G
KEGG name (hits, Adj-P)Hepatitis B virus (70/163, 1e−30)Epstein-Barr virus infection (71/201, 3e−25)Hepatitis C virus (58/155, 5e−22)Influenza A virus (51/167, 2e−15)
BIDCASP8
DCTN1
EIF5AGZMB
IL6 IL10CXCL10
KRT19
SMAD1
NUCB2 PRKCQPTN
PXN
CCL2
CCL19
PRKRATNFSF1 1
TNFSF10
CKAP4PRDX5
TRIM5
ACTG1
AKT1
SLC25A5
APAF1
FASFASLG
ATF4
BAK1BAXBCL2
BID
BTK
CALR
CASP1CASP3
CASP8
CASP9CASP10
RUNX3
CD247
CD44CHUK
ATF2
CREBBP
MAPK14
CTNNB1
GADD45A
DDX3X
E2F1
EGFR
EP300
PTK2B
GRB2
PDIA3
GSK3B
HDAC1
IFNAR2
RBPJ
IKBKB
IL6
CXCL10
IRAK1
IRF3
IRF7
JUN
SMAD2
SMAD3
SMAD4
MAP3K1
MYCNEDD4
NFATC1NFATC2
NFATC3
NFKB1
NFKB2
PCNA
PIK3R1
PPP2CA
MAPK1
MAPK3
MAPK8
MAP2K3
MAP2K6
EIF2AK2
PSMC2PSMC4
PSMC5
PSMD1
PSMD2
PSMD7
PSMD1
RAF1
RB1
RELA
RELB
RXRA
CCL2
CCL5
SRC
STAT1
STAT2
STAT3
STAT4
STAT6
SYK
MAP3K7
TGFB1
TLR3
TNF
TNFAIP3
TNFRSF1A
TP53
TRAF2
TRAF6
VIM
XPO1
YWHAB
YWHAG
YWHAZ
IKBKG
PIAS1
TRADD
RIPK1TNFSF10
FADDTNFRSF10BTNFRSF10A
CFLAR
SOCS3
IKBKE
IRF9
GADD45G YWHAQ
TAB2
DDX58
PYCARDTBK1
MAVS
CREB3L2
TICAM1
PARP1
AKT1
BIRC2
BIRC3
XIAP
FASFASLG
AREG
ARRB1ATF4
BCL2 BCL2A1BCL2L1
BCL6
BTK
CACNB4CASP3
CASP7
CASP8
CASP9CASP10
CEBPB
CHUK
COL1A1COL1A2
COL4A1
COL6A2
ATF2
CREBBP
CRK CRKL
MAPK14
GADD45A
EGFR
ELAVL1
EP300
MECOM
FGFR1
FOXG1
FOXO3
FLNAFLNB
FLNC
FN1
GRB2
GSK3BHGF
PRMT1
HSPA1L
HSPA8
HSP90AA1HSP90AB1
TNC
IFNAR2
IGF1R
IKBKB
IL2RG
IL6
IL6R
IL6ST
IL7
IL7RIL10
IL10RAIL10RB
CXCL10
IRAK1
IRF1
ITGA4
ITGAV
ITGB1
ITGB3
ITGB6
JUN
JUND
LAMA4
LAMA5
LCK
LTA
LTBLTBR
SMAD2
SMAD3SMAD4
MCL1
MAP3K1
MET
MAP3K11
MYC
NFATC1
NFATC3
NFKB1
NFKB2OSM
PDPK1PIK3R1
PLA2G4A
PLK1
PPM1A
PPP2CA
PRKCQ
MAPK1
MAPK3
MAPK8
MAP2K3
MAP2K6
PTEN
PTK2RAF1
RASA1
RBL2
RELA
RELB
RPS6
RXRA
CCL2
CCL5
CCL7
CCL11 CCL13
CCL19
CXCL12
SELE
SPP1
STAT1
STAT2
STAT3
STAT4
STAT6
SYK
MAP3K7
TGFB1
TNF
TNFAIP3
TNFRSF1A
TNFRSF1B
TP53
TRAF1
TRAF2
TRAF6
UBE2I
VCAM1
VWF
YWHAB
YWHAG
YWHAZ
STAM
FOSL1
MAP4K3
IKBKG
PIAS1
TNFSF11
TRADD
RIPK1
TNFSF10
FADDCFLAR
BCL10
SOCS3
IKBKE
IRF9
MALT1
GADD45G YWHAQ
RIPK3
CDC37
TAB2
MAPK8IP3
SIRT1
DDX58
RASGRP3
TBK1
PIAS4NOD2
CREB3L2
ITCH
CARD11
TICAM1
TAB3
PLA2G4B
Viralinfection signature
Signalingpathways(sp)
Networktopology
Legend:
Protein-protein (n = 223)Protein-DNA (n = 109)Others (n = 5)
Curated interactors
Physical association (n = 195)Physical interaction (n = 50)Protein cleavage (n = 43)Transcriptional regulation (n = 30)Others (n = 19)
n = 337
F
Nodes: 959Edges: 1207Seeds: 40
Size: Degree valuesColor: Betweenness centrality
MAPK sp (63/295, 4e−11)PI3K-Akt sp (66/354, 5e−9)FoxO sp (35/132, 5e−9)Jak-STAT sp (36/162, 4e−7)
Species: Homo sapiens only
H
Fig. 5. Arming of CD56bright NK cells associate with COVID-19 disease severity. (A) PCA of COVID-19 patients based on clinical laboratory parameters. (B) Bar plot showing the clinical laboratory parameters contributing to dimension 1 (dim 1) in (A). (C) Spearman correlations between the indicated CD56bright NK cell phenotypic parameters in COVID-19 patients and serum IL-6 levels (n = 24). (D) Spearman correlations between the indicated CD56bright NK cell phenotypic parameters and clinical parameters (n = 25). (E) Correlation matrix showing Spearman correlations between perforin and granzyme expression (MFI) on CD56bright NK cells and the indicated other NK cell phenotypic parameters (n = 25). Color indicates R value, and asterisks indicate P values. (F) Topology and content of the protein-protein interaction network driven by soluble factors (seeds) correlated with perforin and granzyme B expression in CD56bright NK cells. Superimposition of nodes involved in (G) viral infection and (H) signaling pathways on the identified protein-protein interaction network.
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
10 of 14
patients (8). These findings might suggest a direct and virus-specific involvement of adaptive NK cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection, although future studies will be required to formally prove such hy-potheses. Furthermore, future work should, in more detail, assess the phenotype and function of adaptive NK cells in COVID-19 compared with those found only in CMV-seropositive individuals, as well as the possible long-term maintenance of adaptive cells after recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Whereas a recent study reported an increase in NKG2C expres-sion and a corresponding decreased expression of the adaptive NK cell–related marker FcR1ɣ (41), we here provide a deep dissection of the adaptive NK cell phenotype, highlighting that despite their lower responsiveness to cytokines (40), a significant percentage of adaptive NK cells (up to 45%) actively proliferate in COVID-19 pa-tients, albeit at a lower rate compared with nonadaptive NK cells. Moreover, in stark contrast to the robust numeric reduction observed of nonadaptive NK cells and in many other lymphocyte subsets during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (42, 43), adaptive NK cell numbers were unchanged in peripheral blood in severe COVID-19 patients. This suggests that their relative accumulation in blood in the course of the SARS-CoV-2 infection might be related to their higher resistance to cytokine-induced apoptosis (40) or to a differ-ent sensitivity to chemotactic signals compared with nonadaptive NK cells. More mature CD62L−NKG2A− CD56dim NK cells express higher levels of CX3CR1 compared with less mature NKG2A+ and CD62L+ CD56dim NK cells (44), and the CX3CR1 ligand CX3CL1 was one of the few chemokines that were not induced in BAL from COVID-19 patients (25). Conversely, CXCR3, ligands for which were up-regulated in BAL of COVID-19 patients (24), is expressed at low levels by mature CD57+ CD56dim NK cells (45). As adaptive CD56dim NK cells display a highly mature phenotype, it is likely that they express high CX3CR1 but low CXCR3 compared with less ma-ture nonadaptive CD56dim NK cells and might thus be more likely to maintain in circulation.
Adaptive NK cells can sense target cells via NKG2C directly rec-ognizing HLA-E. Here, we found up-regulated HLA-E in immune and stromal cells in BAL fluid of COVID-19 patients, suggesting a receptor-ligand driven expansion of adaptive NK cells. Expansion of adaptive NK cells in CMV-seropositive patients was previously reported in acute hantavirus infection (13) and was associated with the up-regulation of both class I MHC and HLA-E on the virus- infected cells. The absence of strong links between soluble serum proteins and adaptive NK cell expansions suggests that their pheno-type is instead driven by receptor-ligand interactions in COVID-19. In CMV infection, virus-encoded peptides presented on HLA-E serve as a key activator of NKG2C+ cells and, together with cytokines, contribute to their expansion and differentiation (46). The potential relevance of the NKG2C–HLA-E axis in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection is highlighted by a recent study showing an increased prevalence of the allelic variant NKG2Cdel, associated with a reduced NKG2C expression, among severe COVID-19 patients, compared with the healthy population (47). Moreover, a higher frequency of the HLA-E*0103 allele was found in intensive care unit (ICU)–hospitalized patients from the same cohort. Together, our working hypothesis is that a higher percentage of NKG2C+ NK cells could be functionally required to unleash NK cell antiviral activity in SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in more severe patients, whereas genetic predisposition leading to the reduction of NKG2C could cause more severe clinical manifestations.
We included viremia and other clinical categorical data that associate with disease severity in the UMAP analysis of NK cells in COVID-19 patients. These integrated immune signatures allowed us to, without a priori knowledge of the disease stage, identify two immunotypes associated with COVID-19 severity. The immuno-type that was linked to severe disease displayed high expression of perforin, Ksp37, and NKG2C. This corroborated our finding of increased adaptive NK cells in severe COVID-19 because a link between NKG2C and disease severity was discovered in two inde-pendent types of analyses. Similarly, both perforin and Ksp37 were part of the compound phenotype of armed CD56bright NK cells that we found associated with severe disease, and the scRNA-seq analy-sis identified effector function as the gene ontology module most highly detected in severe patients. The exact role of Ksp37 in the (adaptive) NK cell response to COVID-19 needs to be determined in future studies. The immunotype linked to moderate disease, on the other hand, was associated with higher expression of MIP-1, CD98, and TIGIT. The association between high expression of the inhibitory checkpoint TIGIT and moderate disease was strength-ened by the fact that the armed CD56bright NK cell phenotype negatively correlated with TIGIT expression. Future work should address whether containment of NK cells by inhibitory checkpoints could aid in containing hyperinflammation and severe COVID-19 disease.
A strong association between arming of NK cells and disease severity was observed, which was coupled not only to IL-6 levels but also to several clinical disease severity scores. Our protein-protein network linked to this arming revealed that interactions active in COVID-19 were shared with other viral infections such as hepatitis B and IAV. Along the same lines, arming of CD56bright NK cells pri-marily occurred in COVID-19 patients with ongoing SARS-CoV-2 viremia, suggesting this to be a common host response feature of NK cells against several viral infections. Furthermore, NF-B sig-naling was strongly enriched in the protein-protein network. NF-B signaling is important for transcription of the genes encoding perforin and granzyme B in NK cells (48, 49), thus possibly providing a pool of mRNAs that equip CD56bright NK cells with cytotoxicity potential (50) and final signals for cytotoxicity upon target cell recognition (51). Last, IL-6 associated with PI3K-Akt and FoxO sig-naling in NK cells. Both of these pathways are known to coordinate the cell cycle and have previously been reported to be activated in NK cells during acute dengue infection in humans (14). Together, our protein-protein network analysis of soluble factors provided in-sights into shared features between activated NK cells in diverse viral infections and signaling pathways contributing to the arming of CD56bright NK cells.
Although certain aspects of the NK cell response, including emergence of adaptive NK cell expansions and arming of CD56bright NK cells, appeared specific to severe COVID-19, the contribution of these features to the disease pathogenesis needs to be confirmed in relation to the high levels of proinflammatory cytokines present in these patients (52). Thus, future studies should aim to longitudi-nally assess the NK cell response from very early in the acute phase of infection and simultaneously map other innate immune cells, such as monocytes and neutrophils, that are dysregulated in severe COVID-19 (52, 53). Overall, we observed a robust NK cell response toward SARS-CoV-2 infection and specific features unique to severe COVID-19 and hyperinflammation, providing a base for un-derstanding the role of NK cells in patients with COVID-19.
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
11 of 14
MATERIALS AND METHODSPatient characteristicsSARS-CoV-2 RNA+ patients with moderate or severe COVID-19 disease admitted to the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, were recruited to the study. COVID-19 patients were sam-pled 5 to 24 days after symptom debut and 0 to 8 days after being admitted to the hospital. Patients classified as having moderate COVID-19 disease had oxygen saturation of 90 to 94% or were re-ceiving 0.5 to 3 liters/min of oxygen at inclusion. Patients with severe COVID-19 disease were treated in an ICU or a high dependency unit, requiring either noninvasive or mechanical ventilation. Included patients were between 18 and 78 years old. For both groups, patients with current malignant disease and/or ongoing immunomodulatory treatment before hospitalization were excluded. The patients were further described by the SOFA score (54) and the National Insti-tutes of Health (NIH) ordinal scale (55). Healthy controls were SARS-CoV-2 IgG seronegative at time of inclusion, median age was 50 to 59 years, and 11 of 17 were male (65%). All clinical laboratory analyses, including serology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for CMV and SARS-CoV-2, were performed using clinical routine as-says in the clinical laboratories at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority, and all patients gave informed consent. For de-tailed clinical information, see tables S1 and S2.
Cell preparation and flow cytometryVenous blood samples were collected in heparin tubes and PBMCs isolated using Ficoll gradient centrifugation. PBMCs were thereafter stained fresh with the antibody mix (for antibodies, see table S3). Live/Dead cell discrimination was performed using fixable viability dye (Invitrogen). Cells were permeabilized with the Foxp3/Tran-scription Factor Staining Kit (eBioscience). After staining, cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 2 hours before being acquired on a BD FACSymphony with 355-, 405-, 488-, 561-, and 640-nm lasers. In addition, 50 l of whole blood from each patient and healthy control was used with BD Trucount Tubes to obtain absolute counts of NK cells in the blood according to the instruc-tions from the manufacturer.
Flow cytometry data analysisFCS3.0 files were exported from the FACSDiva and imported into FlowJo v.10.6.2 for subsequent analysis. The following plug-ins were used: FlowAI (2.1), DownSample (3.2), UMAP (3.1), and PhenoGraph (2.4). First, the data were preprocessed using FlowAI (all checks, second fraction FR = 0.1, alpha FR = 0.01, maximum changepoints = 3, changepoint penalty = 500, and dynamic range check side = both) to remove any anomalies present in the FCS files. Then, the compensation matrix for the 28-color flow cytometry panel was generated using AutoSpill (56) and applied to files. Data-set as such was used for the downstream analysis in both manual gating and automated analysis. For the automated analysis, events were first downsampled from the NK gate across all samples using DownSample (fig. S5, A and B). Clinical parameter categorical val-ues for each sample were added to downsampled populations as metadata to enable identification of these groups, and these were then concatenated for analysis. UMAP was run using all parameters from the panel except BV510 (Live/Dead, CD14, CD15, and CD19) and phycoerythrin (PE)–Cy5 (CD3). PhenoGraph was run using the same parameters from the panel as UMAP (and k = 30). Fifteen
thousand cells per sample were exported from the NK gate, apart from six patient samples with fewer events where all cells were tak-en. When assigning categorical groups formed by different clinical parameters, there was an uneven number of patients represented in each group (e.g., 17 “healthy controls,” 12 “viremic,” and 12 “non-viremic” patients). Over- and underrepresented input groups will be similarly weighted in the PhenoGraph output clusters. Therefore, we normalized the PhenoGraph output clusters to account for the total number of cells from each input group. Certain figures were generated in R (versions 3.6.0 and 3.6.1) with packages factoextra (v1.0.5), RColorBrewer (v1.1-2), ggplot2 (v3.2.1 and v3.3.0), tidyr (v.1.0.2), randomcoloR (v.1.1.0.1), reshape2 (v.1.4.3), viridis (v.0.5.1), and pheatmap (v.10.12).
KIR-ligand genotypingThe DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN) was used to extract ge-nomic DNA from control and patient whole blood (collected in the EDTA blood tubes). DNA was extracted from 100 l of whole blood according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was precipitated from the eluate obtained after the last step of the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit protocol, with 2.5× volume 100% ethanol and 0.1× volume 3 M sodium acetate per reaction, and washed with 70% ethanol. DNA concentration was determined with Qubit 4. KIR- ligand genotyping was performed using the KIR HLA Ligand Kit (Olerup-SSP/CareDx) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
Serum protein quantification using proximity extension assaySera from all patients were evaluated for soluble factors using prox-imity extension assay technology (Olink AB, Uppsala), where 276 selected soluble factors were analyzed.
Strategy to identify adaptive NK cell expansionsCMV-seropositive healthy controls and COVID-19 patients dis-playing more than 5% of NKG2C+CD57+ cells within their CD56dim NK cell population were considered to have adaptive NK cell ex-pansions (fig. S5A). In all individuals with adaptive expansions, adaptive NK cells displayed higher (>20%) frequencies of either CD57, CD38, or single KIRs compared with the nonadaptive NK cells (and also in one case high NKG2A). One patient displayed a percentage of adaptive NK cells lower than 5% (3.64%) but was in-cluded in the expansion group because coexpression of the other phenotypical markers (differential NKG2A, CD57, CD38, and KIR expression) was in line with what has been described for adaptive NK cells.
scRNA-seq data analysisPreprocessed scRNA-seq data were obtained from a published dataset (24). Data in h5 format were read using Seurat (v3.1.5), then filtered for zero-variance genes, and size-factor–normalized using scater v1.12.2/scran v1.12.1. CD8 T cells were excluded from down-stream NK cell analyses based on k-means clustering of CD8 and NK cell markers from the human cell atlas PBMC benchmarking dataset (57), followed by renormalization of the data. The top 1000 highly variable genes were identified using scran [ranked by biological variance and FDR (false discovery rate)] and used for UMAP dimen-sionality reduction. Pairwise differential expression of genes detected in at least 20% of cells was performed using MAST (v1.10.0), and genes with an FDR < 10−3 in any comparison were clustered into six clusters
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
12 of 14
(determined by gap statistic) by k-means clustering of z scores. Gene ontology enrichment of gene clusters was performed using PANTHER overrepresentation tests (release 20200407) using gene ontology database 2020-03-23. Gene set enrichment for bone mar-row and blood NK cell signature gene sets (58) was performed using MAST against a bootstrapped (n = 100) control model of the data, and test statistics were combined using the Stouffer method. Data were visualized using ComplexHeatmap (v2.0.0) and ggplot2 (v3.2.1).
Network analysisFor network analyses, literature-curated interactions from Interna-tional Molecular Exchange (IMEx) Consortium interactome database, Innate DB, were used. Generic protein-protein interaction network analysis was performed using Steiner forest network and visualized using NetworkAnalyst3.0.
Statistical analysisStatistical significance was determined using GraphPad Prism v8. For comparisons between three groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test were used. For two groups, either parametric or nonparametric matched or nonmatched tests were performed. Where indicated, z score of either median fluorescence intensity (MFI) or percent-age of marker expression was calculated as follows: z = (x − μ) _ σ , where xis the raw score, is the mean of sample distribution, and is the SD. For categorical comparisons, Fisher’s exact test was used. Sig-nificant PhenoGraph clusters (P ≤ 0.05) were determined by chi-square goodness-of-fit tests comparing the relative abundance of each categorical group in each individual PhenoGraph cluster rela-tive to input. For flow cytometry analysis, expression data for mul-tiple markers (both MFI and percentage of protein-expressing cells) derived from gates containing less than 100 events were excluded from analysis. When analyzing the percentage of Ki-67–expressing cells, data derived from gates containing less than 50 cells were excluded from analysis. More details on the exact statistical tests used are mentioned in the respective text/figure legends.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALSimmunology.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/5/50/eabd6832/DC1Fig. S1. NK cell differentiation in COVID-19 disease.Fig. S2. NK cell activation in COVID-19 disease.Fig. S3. KIRs and NK cell education in COVID-19 disease.Fig. S4. Adaptive NK cell expansions in COVID-19.Fig. S5. Strategy for UMAP analysis and representative marker expression.Fig. S6. Selected PhenoGraph clusters and their markers are expressed differentially across clinical parameter–defined patient groups.Fig. S7. Correlations between CD56bright NK cell arming, NK cell phenotype, and soluble factors in COVID-19.Table S1. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients.Table S2. Clinical laboratory results of COVID-19 patients.Table S3. Flow cytometry panel.Table S4. Gene ontology analysis of DEGs from scRNA-seq analysis of BAL NK cells in COVID-19 (Excel spreadsheet).Table S5. KIR-ligand and CMV characteristics.Table S6. Clinical laboratory results of all patients with and without adaptive NK cell expansions.Table S7. Clinical laboratory results of severe patients with and without adaptive NK cell expansions.Table S8. Analysis of the observed distribution of PhenoGraph clusters across clinical parameter–defined groups.Table S9. Literature-curated interactions from IMEx Consortium interactome database (Excel spreadsheet).Table S10. Nodes and related degrees and betweenness (Excel spreadsheet).
Table S11. Overview of the KEGG pathways (Excel spreadsheet).Table S12. Raw data file (Excel spreadsheet).
View/request a protocol for this paper from Bio-protocol.
REFERENCES AND NOTES1. W.-J. Guan, Z.-Y. Ni, Y. Hu, W.-H. Liang, C.-Q. Ou, J.-X. He, L. Liu, H. Shan, C.-L. Lei,
D. S. C. Hui, B. Du, L.-J. Li, G. Zeng, K.-Y. Yuen, R.-C. Chen, C.-L. Tang, T. Wang, P.-Y. Chen, J. Xiang, S.-Y. Li, J.-L. Wang, Z.-J. Liang, Y.-X. Peng, L. Wei, Y. Liu, Y.-H. Hu, P. Peng, J.-M. Wang, J.-Y. Liu, Z. Chen, G. Li, Z.-J. Zheng, S.-Q. Qiu, J. Luo, C.-J. Ye, S.-Y. Zhu, N.-S. Zhong; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19, Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1708–1720 (2020).
2. C. Huang, Y. Wang, X. Li, L. Ren, J. Zhao, Y. Hu, L. Zhang, G. Fan, J. Xu, X. Gu, Z. Cheng, T. Yu, J. Xia, Y. Wei, W. Wu, X. Xie, W. Yin, H. Li, M. Liu, Y. Xiao, H. Gao, L. Guo, J. Xie, G. Wang, R. Jiang, Z. Gao, Q. Jin, J. Wang, B. Cao, Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395, 497–506 (2020).
3. P. Mehta, D. F. McAuley, M. Brown, E. Sanchez, R. S. Tattersall, J. J. Manson; HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK, COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 395, 1033–1034 (2020).
4. E. J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, M. G. Netea, N. Rovina, K. Akinosoglou, A. Antoniadou, N. Antonakos, G. Damoraki, T. Gkavogianni, M.-E. Adami, P. Katsaounou, M. Ntaganou, M. Kyriakopoulou, G. Dimopoulos, I. Koutsodimitropoulos, D. Velissaris, P. Koufargyris, A. Karageorgos, K. Katrini, V. Lekakis, M. Lupse, A. Kotsaki, G. Renieris, D. Theodoulou, V. Panou, E. Koukaki, N. Koulouris, C. Gogos, A. Koutsoukou, Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe 27, 992–1000.e3 (2020).
5. G. Chen, D. Wu, W. Guo, Y. Cao, D. Huang, H. Wang, T. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Chen, H. Yu, X. Zhang, M. Zhang, S. Wu, J. Song, T. Chen, M. Han, S. Li, X. Luo, J. Zhao, Q. Ning, Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 2620–2629 (2020).
6. D. Blanco-Melo, B. E. Nilsson-Payant, W.-C. Liu, S. Uhl, D. Hoagland, R. Møller, T. X. Jordan, K. Oishi, M. Panis, D. Sachs, T. T. Wang, R. E. Schwartz, J. K. Lim, R. A. Albrecht, B. R. tenOever, Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 181, 1036–1045.e9 (2020).
7. L. Ni, F. Ye, M.-L. Cheng, Y. Feng, Y.-Q. Deng, H. Zhao, P. Wei, J. Ge, M. Gou, X. Li, L. Sun, T. Cao, P. Wang, C. Zhou, R. Zhang, P. Liang, H. Guo, X. Wang, C.-F. Qin, F. Chen, C. Dong, Detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. Immunity 52, 971–977.e3 (2020).
8. T. Sekine, A. Perez-Potti, O. Rivera-Ballesteros, K. Strålin, J.-B. Gorin, A. Olsson, S. Llewellyn-Lacey, H. Kamal, G. Bogdanovic, S. Muschiol, D. J. Wullimann, T. Kammann, J. Emgård, T. Parrot, E. Folkesson; Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group, O. Rooyackers, L. I. Eriksson, J.-I. Henter, A. Sönnerborg, T. Allander, J. Albert, M. Nielsen, J. Klingström, S. Gredmark-Russ, N. K. Björkström, J. K. Sandberg, D. A. Price, H.-G. Ljunggren, S. Aleman, M. Buggert, Robust T cell immunity in convalescent individuals with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19. Cell , 1–46 (2020).
9. A. Grifoni, D. Weiskopf, S. I. Ramirez, J. Mateus, J. M. Dan, C. R. Moderbacher, S. A. Rawlings,A. Sutherland, L. Premkumar, R. S. Jadi, D. Marrama, A. M. de Silva, A. Frazier, A. F. Carlin, J. A. Greenbaum, B. Peters, F. Krammer, D. M. Smith, S. Crotty, A. Sette, Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell 181, 1489–1501.e15 (2020).
10. E. Vivier, E. Tomasello, M. Baratin, T. Walzer, S. Ugolini, Functions of natural killer cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 503–510 (2008).
11. C. A. Biron, K. S. Byron, J. L. Sullivan, Severe herpesvirus infections in an adolescent without natural killer cells. N. Engl. J. Med. 320, 1731–1735 (1989).
12. J. S. Orange, Human natural killer cell deficiencies. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 6, 399–409 (2006).
13. N. K. Björkström, T. Lindgren, M. Stoltz, C. Fauriat, M. Braun, M. Evander, J. Michaëlsson, K.-J. Malmberg, J. Klingström, C. Ahlm, H.-G. Ljunggren, Rapid expansion and long-term persistence of elevated NK cell numbers in humans infected with hantavirus. J. Exp. Med.208, 13–21 (2011).
14. C. L. Zimmer, M. Cornillet, C. Solà-Riera, K.-W. Cheung, M. A. Ivarsson, M. Q. Lim, N. Marquardt, Y.-S. Leo, D. C. Lye, J. Klingström, P. A. MacAry, H.-G. Ljunggren, L. Rivino, N. K. Björkström, NK cells are activated and primed for skin-homing during acute dengue virus infection in humans. Nat. Commun. 10, 3897 (2019).
15. K. Blom, M. Braun, J. Pakalniene, S. Lunemann, M. Enqvist, L. Dailidyte, M. Schaffer, L. Lindquist, A. Mickiene, J. Michaëlsson, H.-G. Ljunggren, S. Gredmark-Russ, NK cell responses to human tick-borne encephalitis virus infection. J. Immunol. 197, 2762–2771 (2016).
16. M. Scharenberg, S. Vangeti, E. Kekäläinen, P. Bergman, M. Al-Ameri, N. Johansson, K. Sondén, S. Falck-Jones, A. Färnert, H.-G. Ljunggren, J. Michaëlsson, A. Smed-Sörensen, N. Marquardt, Influenza A virus infection induces hyperresponsiveness in human lung tissue-resident and peripheral blood NK cells. Front. Immunol. 10, 1116 (2019).
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
13 of 14
17. S. N. Waggoner, M. Cornberg, L. K. Selin, R. M. Welsh, Natural killer cells act as rheostats modulating antiviral T cells. Nature 481, 394–398 (2012).
18. N. K. Björkström, H.-G. Ljunggren, J. Michaëlsson, Emerging insights into natural killer cells in human peripheral tissues. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 310–320 (2016).
19. N. Marquardt, E. Kekäläinen, P. Chen, E. Kvedaraite, J. N. Wilson, M. A. Ivarsson, J. Mjösberg, L. Berglin, J. Säfholm, M. L. Manson, M. Adner, M. Al-Ameri, P. Bergman, A.-C. Orre, M. Svensson, B. Dahlén, S.-E. Dahlén, H.-G. Ljunggren, J. Michaëlsson, Human lung natural killer cells are predominantly comprised of highly differentiated hypofunctional CD69–CD56dim cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 139, 1321–1330.e4 (2017).
20. A. J. Wilk, A. Rustagi, N. Q. Zhao, J. Roque, G. J. Martínez-Colón, J. L. McKechnie, G. T. Ivison, T. Ranganath, R. Vergara, T. Hollis, L. J. Simpson, P. Grant, A. Subramanian, A. J. Rogers, C. A. Blish, A single-cell atlas of the peripheral immune response in patients with severe COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 1070–1076 (2020).
21. Y. Jiang, X. Wei, J. Guan, S. Qin, Z. Wang, H. Lu, J. Qian, L. Wu, Y. Chen, Y. Chen, X. Lin, COVID-19 pneumonia: CD8+ T and NK cells are decreased in number but compensatory increased in cytotoxic potential. Clin. Immunol. 218, 108516 (2020).
22. A. Mazzoni, L. Salvati, L. Maggi, M. Capone, A. Vanni, M. Spinicci, J. Mencarini, R. Caporale, B. Peruzzi, A. Antonelli, M. Trotta, L. Zammarchi, L. Ciani, L. Gori, C. Lazzeri, A. Matucci, A. Vultaggio, O. Rossi, F. Almerigogna, P. Parronchi, P. Fontanari, F. Lavorini, A. Peris, G. M. Rossolini, A. Bartoloni, S. Romagnani, F. Liotta, F. Annunziato, L. Cosmi, Impaired immune cell cytotoxicity in severe COVID-19 is IL-6 dependent. J. Clin. Invest., 138554 (2020).
23. F. Wang, J. Nie, H. Wang, Q. Zhao, Y. Xiong, L. Deng, S. Song, Z. Ma, P. Mo, Y. Zhang, Characteristics of peripheral lymphocyte subset alteration in COVID-19 pneumonia. J. Infect. Dis. 221, 1762–1769 (2020).
24. M. Liao, Y. Liu, J. Yuan, Y. Wen, G. Xu, J. Zhao, L. Cheng, J. Li, X. Wang, F. Wang, L. Liu, I. Amit, S. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 842–844 (2020).
25. R. L. Chua, S. Lukassen, S. Trump, B. P. Hennig, D. Wendisch, F. Pott, O. Debnath, L. Thürmann, F. Kurth, M. T. Völker, J. Kazmierski, B. Timmermann, S. Twardziok, S. Schneider, F. Machleidt, H. Müller-Redetzky, M. Maier, A. Krannich, S. Schmidt, F. Balzer, J. Liebig, J. Loske, N. Suttorp, J. Eils, N. Ishaque, U. G. Liebert, C. von Kalle, A. Hocke, M. Witzenrath, C. Goffinet, C. Drosten, S. Laudi, I. Lehmann, C. Conrad, L. E. Sander, R. Eils, COVID-19 severity correlates with airway epithelium–immune cell interactions identified by single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 970–979 (2020).
26. N. K. Björkström, P. Riese, F. Heuts, S. Andersson, C. Fauriat, M. A. Ivarsson, A. T. Björklund, M. Flodström-Tullberg, J. Michaëlsson, M. E. Rottenberg, C. A. Guzman, H.-G. Ljunggren, K.-J. Malmberg, Expression patterns of NKG2A, KIR, and CD57 define a process of CD56dim NK-cell differentiation uncoupled from NK-cell education. Blood 116, 3853–3864 (2010).
27. K. Juelke, M. Killig, M. Luetke-Eversloh, E. Parente, J. Gruen, B. Morandi, G. Ferlazzo, A. Thiel, I. Schmitt-Knosalla, C. Romagnani, CD62L expression identifies a unique subset of polyfunctional CD56dim NK cells. Blood 116, 1299–1307 (2010).
28. S. Kim, J. Poursine-Laurent, S. M. Truscott, L. Lybarger, Y.-J. Song, L. Yang, A. R. French, J. B. Sunwoo, S. Lemieux, T. H. Hansen, W. M. Yokoyama, Licensing of natural killer cells by host major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. Nature 436, 709–713 (2005).
29. N. Anfossi, P. André, S. Guia, C. S. Falk, S. Roetynck, C. A. Stewart, V. Breso, C. Frassati, D. Reviron, D. Middleton, F. Romagné, S. Ugolini, E. Vivier, Human NK cell education by inhibitory receptors for MHC class I. Immunity 25, 331–342 (2006).
30. V. Béziat, L. L. Liu, J.-A. Malmberg, M. A. Ivarsson, E. Sohlberg, A. T. Björklund, C. Retière, E. Sverremark-Ekström, J. Traherne, P. Ljungman, M. Schaffer, D. A. Price, J. Trowsdale, J. Michaëlsson, H.-G. Ljunggren, K.-J. Malmberg, NK cell responses to cytomegalovirus infection lead to stable imprints in the human KIR repertoire and involve activating KIRs. Blood 121, 2678–2688 (2013).
31. S. Lopez-Vergès, J. M. Milush, B. S. Schwartz, M. J. Pando, J. Jarjoura, V. A. York, J. P. Houchins, S. Miller, S.-M. Kang, P. J. Norris, D. F. Nixon, L. L. Lanier, Expansion of a unique CD57+NKG2Chi natural killer cell subset during acute human cytomegalovirus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 14725–14732 (2011).
32. T. Zhang, J. M. Scott, I. Hwang, S. Kim, Cutting edge: Antibody-dependent memory-like NK cells distinguished by FcR deficiency. J. Immunol. 190, 1402–1406 (2013).
33. N. Marquardt, M. A. Ivarsson, K. Blom, V. D. Gonzalez, M. Braun, K. Falconer, R. Gustafsson, A. Fogdell-Hahn, J. K. Sandberg, J. Michaëlsson, The human NK cell response to yellow fever virus 17D is primarily governed by NK cell differentiation independently of NK cell education. J. Immunol. 195, 3262–3272 (2015).
34. National Research Project for SARS, Beijing Group, The involvement of natural killer cells in the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 121, 507–511 (2004).
35. Z. Zhou, L. Ren, L. Zhang, J. Zhong, Y. Xiao, Z. Jia, L. Guo, J. Yang, C. Wang, S. Jiang, D. Yang, G. Zhang, H. Li, F. Chen, Y. Xu, M. Chen, Z. Gao, J. Yang, J. Dong, B. Liu, X. Zhang, W. Wang, K. He, Q. Jin, M. Li, J. Wang, Heightened innate immune responses in the respiratory tract of COVID-19 patients. Cell Host Microbe 27, 883–890.e2 (2020).
36. K. L. Hokeness, W. A. Kuziel, C. A. Biron, T. P. Salazar-Mather, Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and CCR2 interactions are required for IFN-/-induced inflammatory responses and antiviral defense in liver. J. Immunol. 174, 1549–1556 (2005).
37. X. Zeng, T. A. Moore, M. W. Newstead, R. Hernandez-Alcoceba, W. C. Tsai, T. J. Standiford, Intrapulmonary expression of macrophage inflammatory protein 1 (CCL3) induces neutrophil and NK cell accumulation and stimulates innate immunity in murine bacterial pneumonia. Infect. Immun. 71, 1306–1315 (2003).
38. M. J. Trifilo, C. Montalto-Morrison, L. N. Stiles, K. R. Hurst, J. L. Hardison, J. E. Manning, P. S. Masters, T. E. Lane, CXC chemokine ligand 10 controls viral infection in the central nervous system: Evidence for a role in innate immune response through recruitment and activation of natural killer cells. J. Virol. 78, 585–594 (2004).
39. M. Thapa, W. A. Kuziel, D. J. J. Carr, Susceptibility of CCR5-deficient mice to genital herpes simplex virus type 2 is linked to NK cell mobilization. J. Virol. 81, 3704–3713 (2007).
40. H. Schlums, F. Cichocki, B. Tesi, J. Theorell, V. Béziat, T. D. Holmes, H. Han, S. C. C. Chiang, B. Foley, K. Mattsson, S. Larsson, M. Schaffer, K.-J. Malmberg, H.-G. Ljunggren, J. S. Miller, Y. T. Bryceson, Cytomegalovirus infection drives adaptive epigenetic diversification of NK cells with altered signaling and effector function. Immunity 42, 443–456 (2015).
41. S. Varchetta, D. Mele, B. Oliviero, S. Mantovani, S. Ludovisi, A. Cerino, M. Vecchia, S. Roda, M. Sachs, R. Bruno, M. U. Mondelli, Unique immunological profile in patients with COVID-19 (2020); https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-23953/v1.
42. L. Kuri-Cervantes, M. B. Pampena, W. Meng, A. M. Rosenfeld, C. A. G. Ittner, A. R. Weisman, R. S. Agyekum, D. Mathew, A. E. Baxter, L. A. Vella, O. Kuthuru, S. A. Apostolidis, L. Bershaw, J. Dougherty, A. R. Greenplate, A. Pattekar, J. Kim, N. Han, S. Gouma, M. E. Weirick, C. P. Arevalo, M. J. Bolton, E. C. Goodwin, E. M. Anderson, S. E. Hensley, T. K. Jones, N. S. Mangalmurti, E. T. L. Prak, E. J. Wherry, N. J. Meyer, M. R. Betts, Comprehensive mapping of immune perturbations associated with severe COVID-19. Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd7114 (2020).
43. Y. Jouan, A. Guillon, L. Gonzalez, Y. Perez, S. Ehrmann, M. Ferreira, T. Daix, R. Jeannet, B. Francois, P.-F. Dequin, M. Si-Tahar, T. Baranek, C. Paget, Functional alteration of innate T cells in critically ill Covid-19 patients. medRxiv 2020.05.03.20089300 (2020).
44. I. Hamann, N. Unterwalder, A. E. Cardona, C. Meisel, F. Zipp, R. M. Ransohoff, C. Infante-Duarte, Analyses of phenotypic and functional characteristics of CX3CR1-expressing natural killer cells. Immunology 133, 62–73 (2011).
45. M. Lima, M. Leander, M. Santos, A. H. Santos, C. Lau, M. L. Queirós, M. Gonçalves, S. Fonseca, J. Moura, M. D. A. Teixeira, A. Orfao, Chemokine receptor expression on normal blood CD56+ NK-cells elucidates cell partners that comigrate during the innate and adaptive immune responses and identifies a transitional NK-cell population. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 839684 (2015).
46. Q. Hammer, T. Rückert, E. M. Borst, J. Dunst, A. Haubner, P. Durek, F. Heinrich, G. Gasparoni, M. Babic, A. Tomic, G. Pietra, M. Nienen, I. W. Blau, J. Hofmann, I.-K. Na, I. Prinz, C. Koenecke, P. Hemmati, N. Babel, R. Arnold, J. Walter, K. Thurley, M.-F. Mashreghi, M. Messerle, C. Romagnani, Peptide-specific recognition of human cytomegalovirus strains controls adaptive natural killer cells. Nat. Immunol. 19, 453–463 (2018).
47. H. Vietzen, A. Zoufaly, Marianna, J. Aberle, Stephan, E. Puchhammer-Stöckl, NK cell receptor NKG2C deletion and HLA-E variants are risk factors for severe COVID-19 (2020); https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-34505/v1.
48. J. Zhou, J. Zhang, M. G. Lichtenheld, G. G. Meadows, A role for NF-B activation in perforin expression of NK cells upon IL-2 receptor signaling. J. Immunol. 169, 1319–1325 (2002).
49. C. Huang, E. Bi, Y. Hu, W. Deng, Z. Tian, C. Dong, Y. Hu, B. Sun, A novel NF-B binding site controls human granzyme B gene transcription. J. Immunol. 176, 4173–4181 (2006).
50. T. A. Fehniger, S. F. Cai, X. Cao, A. J. Bredemeyer, R. M. Presti, A. R. French, T. J. Ley, Acquisition of murine NK cell cytotoxicity requires the translation of a pre-existing pool of granzyme B and perforin mRNAs. Immunity 26, 798–811 (2007).
51. H.-J. Kwon, G.-E. Choi, S. Ryu, S. J. Kwon, S. C. Kim, C. Booth, K. E. Nichols, H. S. Kim, Stepwise phosphorylation of p65 promotes NF-B activation and NK cell responses during target cell recognition. Nat. Commun. 7, 11686 (2016).
52. C. Lucas, P. Wong, J. Klein, T. B. R. Castro, J. Silva, M. Sundaram, M. K. Ellingson, T. Mao, J. E. Oh, B. Israelow, T. Takahashi, M. Tokuyama, P. Lu, A. Venkataraman, A. Park, S. Mohanty, H. Wang, A. L. Wyllie, C. B. F. Vogels, R. Earnest, S. Lapidus, I. M. Ott, A. J. Moore, M. C. Muenker, J. B. Fournier, M. Campbell, C. D. Odio, A. Casanovas-Massana; Yale IMPACT Team, R. Herbst, A. C. Shaw, R. Medzhitov, W. L. Schulz, N. D. Grubaugh, C. Dela Cruz, S. Farhadian, A. I. Ko, S. B. Omer, A. Iwasaki, Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. Nature 584, 463–469 (2020).
53. J. Schulte-Schrepping, N. Reusch, D. Paclik, K. Bassler, S. Schlickeiser, B. Zhang, B. Krämer, T. Krammer, S. Brumhard, L. Bonaguro, E. De Domenico, D. Wendisch, M. Grasshoff, T. S. Kapellos, M. Beckstette, T. Pecht, A. Saglam, O. Dietrich, H. E. Mei, A. R. Schulz, C. Conrad, D. Kunkel, E. Vafadarnejad, C.-J. Xu, A. Horne, M. Herbert, A. Drews, C. Thibeault, M. Pfeiffer, S. Hippenstiel, A. Hocke, H. Müller-Redetzky, K.-M. Heim, F. Machleidt, A. Uhrig, L. B. de Jarcy, L. Jürgens, M. Stegemann, C. R. Glösenkamp, H.-D. Volk, C. Goffinet, M. Landthaler, E. Wyler, P. Georg, M. Schneider, C. Dang-Heine, N. Neuwinger, K. Kappert, R. Tauber, V. Corman, J. Raabe, K. M. Kaiser, M. T. Vinh, G. Rieke, C. Meisel, T. Ulas, M. Becker, R. Geffers, M. Witzenrath, C. Drosten, N. Suttorp, C. von Kalle,
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Maucourant et al., Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020) 21 August 2020
S C I E N C E I M M U N O L O G Y | R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
14 of 14
F. Kurth, K. Händler, J. L. Schultze, A. C. Aschenbrenner, Y. Li, J. Nattermann, B. Sawitzki, A.-E. Saliba, L. E. Sander; Deutsche COVID-19 OMICS Initiative (DeCOI), Severe COVID-19 is marked by a dysregulated myeloid cell compartment. Cell, 1–64 (2020).
54. M. Singer, C. S. Deutschman, C. W. Seymour, M. Shankar-Hari, D. Annane, M. Bauer, R. Bellomo, G. R. Bernard, J.-D. Chiche, C. M. Coopersmith, R. S. Hotchkiss, M. M. Levy, J. C. Marshall, G. S. Martin, S. M. Opal, G. D. Rubenfeld, T. van der Poll, J.-L. Vincent, D. C. Angus, The Third International Consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315, 801–810 (2016).
55. J. H. Beigel, K. M. Tomashek, L. E. Dodd, A. K. Mehta, B. S. Zingman, A. C. Kalil, E. Hohmann, H. Y. Chu, A. Luetkemeyer, S. Kline, D. L. de Castilla, R. W. Finberg, K. Dierberg, V. Tapson, L. Hsieh, T. F. Patterson, R. Paredes, D. A. Sweeney, W. R. Short, G. Touloumi, D. C. Lye, N. Ohmagari, M.-D. Oh, G. M. Ruiz-Palacios, T. Benfield, G. Fätkenheuer, M. G. Kortepeter, R. L. Atmar, C. B. Creech, J. Lundgren, A. G. Babiker, S. Pett, J. D. Neaton, T. H. Burgess, T. Bonnett, M. Green, M. Makowski, A. Osinusi, S. Nayak, H. C. Lane; ACTT-1 Study Group Members, Remdesivir for the treatment of covid-19—Preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med., NEJMoa2007764 (2020).
56. C. P. Roca, O. T. Burton, T. Prezzemolo, C. E. Whyte, R. Halpert, Ł. Kreft, J. Collier, A. Botzki, J. Spidlen, S. Humblet-Baron, A. Liston, AutoSpill: A method for calculating spillover coefficients in high-parameter flow cytometry. bioRxiv 2020.06.29.177196 [Preprint]. 10 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.29.177196.
57. E. Mereu, A. Lafzi, C. Moutinho, C. Ziegenhain, D. J. McCarthy, A. Alvarez-Varela, E. Batlle, Sagar, D. Grün, J. K. Lau, S. C. Boutet, C. Sanada, A. Ooi, R. C. Jones, K. Kaihara, C. Brampton, Y. Talaga, Y. Sasagawa, K. Tanaka, T. Hayashi, C. Braeuning, C. Fischer, S. Sauer, T. Trefzer, C. Conrad, X. Adiconis, L. T. Nguyen, A. Regev, J. Z. Levin, S. Parekh, A. Janjic, L. E. Wange, J. W. Bagnoli, W. Enard, M. Gut, R. Sandberg, I. Nikaido, I. Gut, O. Stegle, H. Heyn, Benchmarking single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols for cell atlas projects. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 747–755 (2020).
58. C. Yang, J. R. Siebert, R. Burns, Z. J. Gerbec, B. Bonacci, A. Rymaszewski, M. Rau, M. J. Riese, S. Rao, K.-S. Carlson, J. M. Routes, J. W. Verbsky, M. S. Thakar, S. Malarkannan, Heterogeneity of human bone marrow and blood natural killer cells defined by single-cell transcriptome. Nat. Commun. 10, 3931 (2019).
Acknowledgments: We thank C. Hull for methodological discussions and E. Lugli’s group for technical assistance with R Studio. The members of the Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group are as follows: John Tyler Sandberg, Helena Bergsten, Niklas K Björkström, Susanna Brighenti, Marcus Buggert, Marta Butrym, Benedict J. Chambers, Puran Chen, Martin Cornillet, Angelica Cuapio, Isabel Diaz Lozano, Majda Dzidic, Johanna Emgård, Malin Flodström-Tullberg, Jean-Baptiste Gorin, Sara Gredmark-Russ, Alvaro Haroun-Izquierdo, Laura Hertwig, Sadaf Kalsum, Jonas Klingström, Efthymia Kokkinou, Egle Kvedaraite, Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren, Magdalini Lourda, Kimia T Maleki, Karl-Johan Malmberg, Jakob Michaëlsson, Jenny Mjösberg, Kirsten Moll, Jagadeeswara Rao Muvva, Anna Norrby-Teglund, Laura M. Palma Medina, Tiphaine Parrot, Lena Radler, Emma Ringqvist, Johan K. Sandberg, Takuya Sekine, Tea Soini, Mattias
Svensson, Janne Tynell, Andreas von Kries, David Wullimann, André Perez-Potti, Olga Rivera-Ballesteros, Christopher Maucourant, Renata Varnaite, Mira Akber, Lena Berglin, Demi Brownlie, Marco Giulio Loreti, Ebba Sohlberg, Tobias Kammann, Elisabeth Henriksson, Nicole Marquardt, Kristoffer Strålin, Soo Aleman, Anders Sönnerborg, Lena Dillner, Anna Färnert, Hedvig Glans, Pontus Nauclér, Olav Rooyackers, Johan Mårtensson, Lars I Eriksson, Björn P. Persson, Jonathan Grip, and Christian Unge. Funding: This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Nordstjernan AB, the Center for Innovative Medicine at Karolinska Institutet, Region Stockholm, SRP Diabetes Karolinska Institutet, StratRegen Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska Institutet. I.F. and C.M. are funded by the Wenner-Gren Foundations, and Q.H. is supported by the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO ALTF 802-2018). Author contributions: Conceptualization: C.M., I.F., A.P., N.K.B., and Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group; methodology: C.M., I.F., A.P., Q.H., N.M., D.B., J.M., and R.M.H.; formal analysis: C.M., I.F., A.P., M.C., A.L., and Q.H.; investigation: M.C., B.S., D.B., A.C., J.M., N.M., and K.S.; resources: S.A., B.R., E.H.A., L.H., A.H.-I., M.S., J.K., E.F., M.B., J.K.S., L.I.E., O.R., H.-G.L., and K.-J.M.; writing (original draft): N.K.B.; writing (review and editing): all authors; supervision: N.K.B. Competing interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. K.-J.M. is a Scientific Advisor and has a research grant from Fate Therapeutics and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Vycellix Inc. H.-G.L. is a member of the board of XNK Therapeutics AB and Vycellix Inc. Data and materials availability: Curated flow cytometry data will be made available for exploration via the Karolinska COVID-19 Immune Atlas. All other data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper or the Supplementary Materials. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This license does not apply to figures/photos/artwork or other content included in the article that is credited to a third party; obtain authorization from the rights holder before using such material.
Submitted 6 July 2020 Accepted 19 August 2020 Published First Release 21 August 2020Final published 16 September 202010.1126/sciimmunol.abd6832
Citation: C. Maucourant, I. Filipovic, A. Ponzetta, S. Aleman, M. Cornillet, L. Hertwig, B. Strunz, A. Lentini, B. Reinius, D. Brownlie, A. Cuapio, E. H. Ask, R. M. Hull, A. Haroun-Izquierdo, M. Schaffer, J. Klingström, E. Folkesson, M. Buggert, J. K. Sandberg, L. I. Eriksson, O. Rooyackers, H.-G. Ljunggren, K.-J. Malmberg, J. Michaëlsson, N. Marquardt, Q. Hammer, K. Strålin, N. K. Björkström, The Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group, Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severity. Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020).
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severity
K. Björkström and The Karolinska COVID-19 Study GroupHans-Gustaf Ljunggren, Karl-Johan Malmberg, Jakob Michaëlsson, Nicole Marquardt, Quirin Hammer, Kristoffer Strålin, Niklas Schaffer, Jonas Klingström, Elin Folkesson, Marcus Buggert, Johan K. Sandberg, Lars I. Eriksson, Olav Rooyackers,Lentini, Björn Reinius, Demi Brownlie, Angelica Cuapio, Eivind Heggernes Ask, Ryan M. Hull, Alvaro Haroun-Izquierdo, Marie Christopher Maucourant, Iva Filipovic, Andrea Ponzetta, Soo Aleman, Martin Cornillet, Laura Hertwig, Benedikt Strunz, Antonio
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd6832First published 21 August 2020
, eabd6832.5Sci. Immunol.
immunopathology.examining the mechanisms of NK cell activation in COVID-19 and their potential roles in host protection and subset was markedly expanded in a subset of severe patients. These findings lay the groundwork for future studiesresulted in an increase in ''armed'' NK cells containing high levels of cytotoxic proteins such as perforin. The adaptive NK infection was associated with fewer blood NK cells but a higher activation state in circulating NK cells. Severe COVID-19high-dimensional flow cytometry to characterize NK cells in patients with moderate or severe COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2
usedet al.cancer, but little is known about their involvement in the host response to COVID-19. Maucourant Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes that provide innate immune defense against viral infections and
Activated NK cells in severe COVID-19
ARTICLE TOOLS http://immunology.sciencemag.org/content/5/50/eabd6832
MATERIALSSUPPLEMENTARY http://immunology.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2020/08/20/5.50.eabd6832.DC1
REFERENCES
http://immunology.sciencemag.org/content/5/50/eabd6832#BIBLThis article cites 55 articles, 15 of which you can access for free
PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions
Terms of ServiceUse of this article is subject to the
is a registered trademark of AAAS.Science ImmunologyNew York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The title (ISSN 2470-9468) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200Science Immunology
BY).Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of
by guest on Decem
ber 22, 2020http://im
munology.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from