New Composing

8/7/2019 New Composing

1/36

1. A training program according to you is:

a) An activity which improves your knowledge and skills.

b) An activity which improves your working ability.

c) An activity which change your attitude and behavior towards work.d) An activity which improve productivity and quality of output.

Response No. of Respondents Percentage

Improves your knowledge

and skills 40 40

Improves your

working ability. 20 20

Change your attitude and behavior towards work 10 10

Improve productivity and

quality of output. 30 30

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 40 % of the people view that training is for improving skills andknowledge. 20% viewed that training is for improving working ability.10% of the respondents viewed

that training is for changing the attitude and behavior towards work. Remaining 30% viewed thattraining is for improving productivity and quality of output.

INFERENCE:

It is clear that majority of the respondents i.e. 40% viewed that training is for improving the

skills and knowledge of employees.


2/36

60

0

40

0

Improves knowledge

and skill

Improves working

ability

Changes attitude and

behavior towards

work

Improves

productivity and

quality of output


3/36

2) Do you think that one need to have training to perform the job effectively?

a) Strongly agree b) Agree

c) Disagree d) Strongly disagree

Response No. of

Respondents

Percentage

Strongly Agree 40 40

Agree 40 40

Disagree 10 10

Strongly Disagree 10 10

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 40% of the respondents strongly agreed that training is required toperform their job effectively. 40% agreed to the above statement. 10% disagreed to the statement and

the remaining 10% strongly disagreed to the statement.

INFERENCE:

It is to be concluded that majority of the respondents think that training is needed to perform their jobeffectively.


4/36

40 40

10 10

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree


5/36

3) In your opinion who has to identify /assess the need to train the employees?

a) Immediate supervisor b) Department head

c) Head of the organization d) The employee himself


Immediate supervisor 60 60

Department head 10 10

Head of the organization 10 10

The employee himself 20 20

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 60% of the respondents expressed that Immediate supervisorhas to identify /assess the need to train the employees. 10% expressed that departmental head has

to assess the need .10% revealed that head of the organization should asses the need . Remaining20% expressed that employee should asses himself the need for training.

INFERENCE:

It is to be concluded that majority of the respondents think that immediate supervisor has to

identify /assess the need to train the employees


6/36

4) In your opinion to whom the training is beneficial?

a) To the employee b) To the organizationc) Both d) To the trainer

60

0

40

0

Improves

knowledge and skill

Improves working

ability

Changes attitude

and behavior

towards work

Improves

productivity and

quality of output


7/36


To the employee 20 20

To the organization 20 20

Both 50 50

To the Trainer 10 10

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 20% of the respondents expressed that training isbeneficial to the employee. 20% expressed that training is beneficial to the organization . 50%

revealed that both are beneficial . Remaining 10% expressed that it is beneficial to theTrainer .

INFERENCE:

It is to be concluded that majority of the respondents think that training is beneficial to both

organization and employee.


8/36

60

0

40

0

Improves

knowledge and skill

Improves working

ability

Changes attitude

and behavior

towards work

Improves

productivity and

quality of output


9/36

5) Where the employees should be trained.

a) In the organization itself

b) In the specialized institutionsc) In other organization similar to our nature of work

d) Any other


In the Organization itself 40 40

In the specializedInstitutions

40 40

In other organizationsimilar to the nature of

work

20 20

Any other 0 0

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 40% of the respondents expressed that employee should be

trained in the organization itself . 40% expressed that employee should be trained in specializedinstitutions. Remaining 20% revealed that training should be in other organization similar to ournature of work .

INFERENCE:

It is inferred that the majority of the respondents expressed that employees should be trained

in the organization itself and in specialized institutions.


10/36

6) How the employees should be trained?

60

0

40

0

Improves knowledge and

skill

Improves working ability Changes attitude and

behavior towards work

Improves productivity and

quality of output


11/36

a) Through lectures

b) Through virtual learningc) Through demonstrations

d) Through interactive sessions


Through Lectures

20 20

Through Virtual

learning 10 10

Through

demonstrations 40 40

Through interactivesessions 30 30

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 20% of the respondents expressed that training for the employeeshould be done through lectures .10% expressed that it should be through virtual learning .40%

revealed that it should be through demonstrations . Remaining 30% expressed that it should bethrough interactive sessions.

INFERENCE:

So it can be concluded that majority of the respondents think that training for the employee

should be done through demonstrations and interactive sessions .


12/36

7) What should be covered in the training?

a) Present requirements of the job.

b) Future challenges of the jobc) Industry requirementsd) All the above

60

0

40

0


skill




quality of output


13/36


Present Requirements

Of the job 20 20

Future challengesOf the job 20 20

Industry Requirements 50 50

All the above 10 10

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 20% of the respondents expressed that present requirements of thejob should be covered in the training.20% expressed that future challenges of the job should becovered. 50% expressed that industry requirements should be covered.10% expressed that all the

three should be covered in the training.

INFERENCE:

It is concluded that majority of the respondents expressed that industry requirements should becovered in the training.


14/36

8) Do you find the duration of training period is adequate to complete a course and theentire program?

a) Perfect b) more

c) Adequate d) lesser


Perfect 50 50

More 20 20

60

0

40

0


skill




quality of output


15/36

Adequate 20 20

Lesser 10 10

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 50% of the respondents expressed that

training period is adequate to complete a course and the entire Program .

20% expressed that training period is more. 20% revealed that it was

adequate . Remaining 10% expressed that training period is not

sufficient to complete their program .

INFERENCE:

So it can be concluded that majority of the respondents think that training period is perfect tocomplete training program .


16/36

9) Do you think that Training helps for the individual and organization development?

(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree

60

0

40

0


skill




quality of output


17/36

(c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree

RESPONSE NUMBER OF

RESPONDENTS

PERCENTAGE


Agree 60 60

Disagree 0 0


TOTAL 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that of all the employees responded 40% strongly agreed that training

helps for the individual and organization development. Remaining 60% expressed agree to theabove statement . none has disagreed.

INFERENCE:

It is clear that majority of the overall respondents i.e 60% think that training helps for the

individual and organization development.


18/36

60

0

40

0


skill




quality of output


19/36

10) Do you think that Quality of Work has changed after the training program?

(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree

(c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree

RESPONSE NUMBER OF

RESPONDENTS

PERCENTAGE


Agree 60 60

Disagree 0 0


TOTAL 60 100


20/36

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 40% of the respondents strongly agreed and

remaining 60% agreed with the statement.N

one has disagreed.

INFERENCE:

It is clear that majority of the respondents think that Quality of work has changed after the

training program.


21/36

11) Was interaction pattern between the trainees and trainers during the

training program is cordial and disciplined?

a) Very cordial and well disciplined b) cordial and well disciplined

c) Fairly cordial and well disciplined d) Not cordial

60

0

40

0


skill




quality of output


22/36

RESPONSE NUMBER OF

RESPONDENTS

PERCENTAGE

Very cordial andWell disciplined

60 60

cordial and

Well disciplined

20 20

Fairly cordial andWell disciplined

20 20

Not cordial 0 0

TOTAL 60 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 60% of the respondents expressed that the interaction pattern between the trainees and trainers during the training program is very cordial and disciplined.

20% expressed that the interaction pattern is cordial and disciplined. Remaining 20% expressedthat interaction pattern is fairly cordial and disciplined.

INFERENCE:

It is clear that the interaction pattern between the trainees and trainers during the

training program is very cordial and disciplined according to the majority of respondents.


23/36

12) When your higher authorities identify that you need Training, are they

Providing any Training programs to you?

60

0

40

0


skill




quality of output


24/36

(a) Yes (b) No (c) Never (d) Rarely

ResponseN

o. of Respondents Percentage

Yes 100 100

No 0 0

Never 0 0

Rarely 0 0

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 100 % of the respondents expressed positively that authorities areproviding training whenever the employees need.

INFERENCE:

It is to be concluded that majority of the respondents think that higher authorities are identifyingand providing training whenever the employees need.


25/36

60

0

40

0


skill




quality of output


26/36

13) If yes does it meet your requirement and job performance?

(a) Yes (b) No


Yes 100 100

No 0 0

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 100 % of the respondents expressed positively that training

provided to the employees is meeting there requirements and job performance.

INFERENCE;

So, it is to be concluded that the training provided to the employees is meeting theirrequirements and job performance.


27/36

14) In which areas do you think you need training?

a) Behavioral b) Technical

c) Both d) Not necessary

60

0

Improves knowledge and skill Improves working ability


28/36

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 40% of the respondents expressed that they would need a training

program under behavioral area. 10% requires training in technical area. 50% requires training inboth technical and behavioral area.

INFERENCE:

It is concluded that majority of the respondents expressed that they need training in both

behavioral and technical aspects.


Behavioral 40 40

Technical 10 10

Both 50 50

Not necessary 0 0

Total 100 100


29/36

15) Did Management followed all types of safety measures when you are undergoing Trainingprograms?

60

0

40

0

Improves

knowledge and skill

Improves working

ability

Changes attitude

and behavior

towards work

Improves

productivity and

quality of output


30/36

a) Strongly agree b) Agree

c) Disagree d) Strongly Disagree



Agree 20 20

Disagree 0 0


Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 80% of the respondents strongly agreed that management

followed all types of safety measures when employees are undergoing training programs.Remaining 20% agreed to the above statement .

INFERENCE:

It is to be concluded that majority of the respondents agreed that management followed all

types of safety measures when employees are undergoing training programs.


31/36


32/36

16) Have you shared your knowledge acquired from training program with your colleagues andsubordinates?

a) Yes b) No


Yes 100 100

No 0 0

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 100% of the respondents says that they would share theirknowledge acquired from training program with their colleagues and subordinates.

60

0

40

0

Improves

knowledge and skill

Improves working

ability

Changes attitude

and behavior

towards work

Improves

productivity and

quality of output


33/36

INFERENCE:

So, it can be concluded employees share their knowledge acquired from training program with

their colleagues and subordinates.

60

0

Improves knowledge and skill Improves working ability


34/36

17) If yes in which way ?

a. Daily interaction with themb. Sessionsc. Separate training schedules for subordinatesd) Casual talking



35/36

Daily interaction

With them 60 60

Sessions 0 0

Separate Trainingschedules for subordinates

40 40

Casual Talking 0 0

Total 100 100

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that 60% of the employees share their knowledge through daily

interactions. Remaining 40% expressed that they interact through separate training

schedules with subordinates.

INFERENCE:

It is to be concluded that majority of the employees share their knowledge through daily

interactions.


36/36

60

0

40

0

Improves

knowledge and skill

Improves working

ability

Changes attitude

and behavior

towards work

Improves

productivity and

quality of output

New Composing

Text of New Composing

W.Russo - A new approach composing music. (1983).pdf

Composing method

Pdst composing

8764066 Composing a New Approach William Russo

Compositing, Composing Worlds

Composing Multiculturalism

Wiggins Composing Lessons

Composing Diagnostic

Composing After Cage

Composing Feature Models

COMPOSING FOR CARS - Goldsmiths, University of Londonresearch.gold.ac.uk/12836/1/COMPOSING FOR CARS.pdf · 2015-08-19 · new musical instrument, a soniﬁcation system or genera-tive

William Russo - Composing Music - A New Approach

Composing Paragraphs

Composing photos

Composing REST Services

Composing Mobile App - Wiley India India Pvt. Ltd. ... 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Mobility Panorama 1.3 Mobile Platforms ... Composing Mobile App Author: Sehgal;Sanjay - New Delhi

Composing Transformations

Composing Booklet

Composing Noise

AMAD-ATL: A tool for dynamically composing new model transformations at runtime

Concurrent systems composing

Composing a Melody; New Melodic Resources

Infrastructure and Composing: The When of New-Media Writinginside.bard.edu/ Media Writing.pdf · Infrastructure and Composing: The When of New-Media Writing Author(s): Dànielle Nicole

Composing - A New Approach by William Russo.pdf

Composing PHP projects A new PHP package manager

Composing Visual Narratives

Russo W. Composing Music (a New Approach)

Composing Collaboration

Composing Music by Composing Rules: Design and …strasheela.sourceforge.net/documents/TorstenAnders-PhDThesis.pdf · Composing Music by Composing Rules: Design and ... Computer-Aided

Composing Project Dependencies

Documents

New Composing

Text of New Composing