16
Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System by Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making Norihiro Saikawa Department of Computer and Information Science Hosei University 3-7-2 Kajino-cho, 184-8584, Japan

Norihiro Saikawa Department of Computer and Information Science Hosei University

  • Upload
    zarifa

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System by Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making. Norihiro Saikawa Department of Computer and Information Science Hosei University 3-7-2 Kajino-cho, 184-8584, Japan. Outline. Outline. Introduction to AHP A Problem in AHP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System by Considering the Ambiguity in Decision MakingNorihiro SaikawaDepartment of Computer and Information ScienceHosei University3-7-2 Kajino-cho, 184-8584, Japan

  • Outline Introduction to AHP

    A Problem in AHP

    Solving the problem by PAHP

    Comparing the performance between AHP and PAHP

    Conclusions & future work

    Outline Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making2/16

  • Introduction to AHP AHP = Analytic Hierarchy ProcessConstructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making3/16Introduction to AHP (1/3) GoalCriterion

  • How to obtain the importance 4/16Pairwise comparisonIntroduction to AHP (2/3) Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making

  • The ratio scale of preference (Saaty)5/16Introduction to AHP (3/3) Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision MakingA (column) is compared to B (row)

  • A problem in AHP6/16A problem in AHP (1/2) Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Makingn-1nP19

  • Solving the problem by PAHP7/16Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision MakingX1X2n-1nP19Solving the problem by PAHP (1/6)

  • Difference of the process8/16Solving the problem by PAHP (2/6) Make a problem hierarchyDo pairwise comparisonThe importance of each criterion is calculated C.I < 0.1 C.R. < 0.1YesNoAHPConstructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making

  • Concept of response value (R)9/16Solving the problem by PAHP (3/6) Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision MakingRatio scale of preference by SaatyResponse value (R)A (column )B (row)Correspondence of the ratio scaleof preference and the response valueA screen shot of how to apply ratio scale of preference

  • How to input users degree of confidenceConstructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making10/16Solving the problem by PAHP (4/6) 17 kinds of verbal expressions to measure the degree of confidence

  • How to estimate the ambiguity11/16Solving the problem by PAHP (5/6) L: The lower limit of the users true preferenceU: The upper limit of the users true preferenceConstructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making

  • How to estimate users true preference12/16Solving the problem by PAHP (6/6) Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making

  • Comparing the performance between AHP and PAHP (1/3)13/16 We simulated the process of pairwise comparisonin the AHP and PAHP and compared the performance with each other in terms of consistency and stability.

    As a result, we found that the PAHP outperforms the AHP when the user is confident about solving the confronting problem. Comparing the performance between AHP and PAHP (1/3)Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making

  • Comparing the performance between AHP and PAHP (2/3)14/16Comparison in terms of consistencyComparing the performance between AHP and PAHP (2/3)Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making

  • Comparing the performance between AHP and PAHP (3/3)Comparison in terms of stability15/16Comparing the performance between AHP and PAHP (3/3)Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making

    Graph2

    93.2592592593

    92.7037037037

    93.1111111111

    92.6666666667

    91.7777777778

    91.6296296296

    91.1111111111

    90.7777777778

    90.0740740741

    89.8148148148

    89.6296296296

    88.5555555556

    88.3333333333

    88.0740740741

    87.7407407407

    87.037037037

    86.962962963

    The index of the scale

    Average total failure raet of preference

    The average total failure rates of different scales (%)

    Sheet1

    scale1scale2scale3scale4scale5scale6scale7scale8scale9scale10scale11scale12scale13scale14scale15scale16scale17

    5147535446494748444346454340423735

    6361635858625760555555535151504850

    7169727068636465636259596361605655

    8378798076757473727374686566696366

    8684868381817978777775737371687172

    8990908886838580838383767980778077

    9293909189919188868582828483828178

    9595959494919191909090868887858284

    9696969793939393939093908687918686

    9797989797969594929494919190888989

    9899989798989796939594959292929291

    9998989998989797969396959693949394

    9999999999989797979896959596959594

    10099999999999898999898969697959697

    10099999999999999989897989798979697

    1001001009999999998999997979797979798

    100100999999999999999898999898979897

    100100100100991009999999999989898989999

    100100100100100100100100999999999998989898

    99991009910010099100999999999999999999

    100100100100100100100100999999999999999998

    10010010010010010010010010010010010099100999999

    1001001001001001001009910099991009999999999

    10010010010010010010010010099999999999910099

    10010010010010010010010010010010099100991009999

    10010010010010010010099100100100100991001009999

    10010010010010010010010010010099100100100999999

    93.259259259392.703703703793.111111111192.666666666791.777777777891.629629629691.111111111190.777777777890.074074074189.814814814889.629629629688.555555555688.333333333388.074074074187.740740740787.03703703786.962962963

    Sheet1

    5147535446494748444346454340423735

    6361635858625760555555535151504850

    7169727068636465636259596361605655

    8378798076757473727374686566696366

    8684868381817978777775737371687172

    8990908886838580838383767980778077

    9293909189919188868582828483828178

    9595959494919191909090868887858284

    9696969793939393939093908687918686

    9797989797969594929494919190888989

    9899989798989796939594959292929291

    9998989998989797969396959693949394

    9999999999989797979896959596959594

    10099999999999898999898969697959697

    10099999999999999989897989798979697

    1001001009999999998999997979797979798

    100100999999999999999898999898979897

    100100100100991009999999999989898989999

    100100100100100100100100999999999998989898

    99991009910010099100999999999999999999

    100100100100100100100100999999999999999998

    10010010010010010010010010010010010099100999999

    1001001001001001001009910099991009999999999

    10010010010010010010010010099999999999910099

    10010010010010010010010010010010099100991009999

    10010010010010010010099100100100100991001009999

    10010010010010010010010010010099100100100999999

    scale1

    scale2

    scale3

    scale4

    scale5

    scale6

    scale7

    scale8

    scale9

    scale10

    scale11

    scale12

    scale13

    scale14

    scale15

    scale16

    scale17

    Sheet2

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    The index of the scale

    Average total failure of preference

    The average total failure of each scales

    Sheet3

    MBD0006E88C.xls

    Graph2

    5147535446494748444346454340423735

    6361635858625760555555535151504850

    7169727068636465636259596361605655

    8378798076757473727374686566696366

    8684868381817978777775737371687172

    8990908886838580838383767980778077

    9293909189919188868582828483828178

    9595959494919191909090868887858284

    9696969793939393939093908687918686

    9797989797969594929494919190888989

    9899989798989796939594959292929291

    9998989998989797969396959693949394

    9999999999989797979896959596959594

    10099999999999898999898969697959697

    10099999999999999989897989798979697

    1001001009999999998999997979797979798

    100100999999999999999898999898979897

    100100100100991009999999999989898989999

    100100100100100100100100999999999998989898

    99991009910010099100999999999999999999

    100100100100100100100100999999999999999998

    10010010010010010010010010010010010099100999999

    1001001001001001001009910099991009999999999

    10010010010010010010010010099999999999910099

    10010010010010010010010010010010099100991009999

    10010010010010010010099100100100100991001009999

    10010010010010010010010010010099100100100999999

    scale1

    scale2

    scale3

    scale4

    scale5

    scale6

    scale7

    scale8

    scale9

    scale10

    scale11

    scale12

    scale13

    scale14

    scale15

    scale16

    scale17

    The number of criterion

    Total failure rate

    Total failure rates for different scales

    Sheet1

    scale1scale2scale3scale4scale5scale6scale7scale8scale9scale10scale11scale12scale13scale14scale15scale16scale17

    5147535446494748444346454340423735

    6361635858625760555555535151504850

    7169727068636465636259596361605655

    8378798076757473727374686566696366

    8684868381817978777775737371687172

    8990908886838580838383767980778077

    9293909189919188868582828483828178

    9595959494919191909090868887858284

    9696969793939393939093908687918686

    9797989797969594929494919190888989

    9899989798989796939594959292929291

    9998989998989797969396959693949394

    9999999999989797979896959596959594

    10099999999999898999898969697959697

    10099999999999999989897989798979697

    1001001009999999998999997979797979798

    100100999999999999999898999898979897

    100100100100991009999999999989898989999

    100100100100100100100100999999999998989898

    99991009910010099100999999999999999999

    100100100100100100100100999999999999999998

    10010010010010010010010010010010010099100999999

    1001001001001001001009910099991009999999999

    10010010010010010010010010099999999999910099

    10010010010010010010010010010010099100991009999

    10010010010010010010099100100100100991001009999

    10010010010010010010010010010099100100100999999

    Sheet1

    scale1

    scale2

    scale3

    scale4

    scale5

    scale6

    scale7

    scale8

    scale9

    scale10

    scale11

    scale12

    scale13

    scale14

    scale15

    scale16

    scale17

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

    Graph2

    5147535446494748444346454340423735

    6361635858625760555555535151504850

    7169727068636465636259596361605655

    8378798076757473727374686566696366

    8684868381817978777775737371687172

    8990908886838580838383767980778077

    9293909189919188868582828483828178

    9595959494919191909090868887858284

    9696969793939393939093908687918686

    9797989797969594929494919190888989

    9899989798989796939594959292929291

    9998989998989797969396959693949394

    9999999999989797979896959596959594

    10099999999999898999898969697959697

    10099999999999999989897989798979697

    1001001009999999998999997979797979798

    100100999999999999999898999898979897

    100100100100991009999999999989898989999

    100100100100100100100100999999999998989898

    99991009910010099100999999999999999999

    100100100100100100100100999999999999999998

    10010010010010010010010010010010010099100999999

    1001001001001001001009910099991009999999999

    10010010010010010010010010099999999999910099

    10010010010010010010010010010010099100991009999

    10010010010010010010099100100100100991001009999

    10010010010010010010010010010099100100100999999

    scale1

    scale2

    scale3

    scale4

    scale5

    scale6

    scale7

    scale8

    scale9

    scale10

    scale11

    scale12

    scale13

    scale14

    scale15

    scale16

    scale17

    The number of criterion

    Total failure rate

    Total failure rates of different scales (%)

    Sheet1

    scale1scale2scale3scale4scale5scale6scale7scale8scale9scale10scale11scale12scale13scale14scale15scale16scale17

    5147535446494748444346454340423735

    6361635858625760555555535151504850

    7169727068636465636259596361605655

    8378798076757473727374686566696366

    8684868381817978777775737371687172

    8990908886838580838383767980778077

    9293909189919188868582828483828178

    9595959494919191909090868887858284

    9696969793939393939093908687918686

    9797989797969594929494919190888989

    9899989798989796939594959292929291

    9998989998989797969396959693949394

    9999999999989797979896959596959594

    10099999999999898999898969697959697

    10099999999999999989897989798979697

    1001001009999999998999997979797979798

    100100999999999999999898999898979897

    100100100100991009999999999989898989999

    100100100100100100100100999999999998989898

    99991009910010099100999999999999999999

    100100100100100100100100999999999999999998

    10010010010010010010010010010010010099100999999

    1001001001001001001009910099991009999999999

    10010010010010010010010010099999999999910099

    10010010010010010010010010010010099100991009999

    10010010010010010010099100100100100991001009999

    10010010010010010010010010010099100100100999999

    Sheet1

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    00000000000000000

    scale1

    scale2

    scale3

    scale4

    scale5

    scale6

    scale7

    scale8

    scale9

    scale10

    scale11

    scale12

    scale13

    scale14

    scale15

    scale16

    scale17

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • Conclusions & future workConclusions & future work16/16The advantage of using PAHP:

    Necessary improvement of PAHP:

    Being able to estimate the preference of the user more precisely than AHP To apply the decision time of the user in the process of pairwise comparison to estimate the confidence more precisely.Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making