24
RESEARCH EDUCATION ADVOCACY N ORTH A MERICAN SPINE SOCIETY 2003 ANNUAL REPORT

NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

RESE

ARCH

EDUC

ATIO

N

ADVO

CACY

NORTH AMERICAN

SPINE SOCIETY

2003ANNUALREPORT

Page 2: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

Letter from the president, Dave WongA MESSAGEFROM THEPRESIDENT

2003 BOARDOF DIRECTORSDavid A. Wong, MD,MSc,FRCS(C) PresidentThomas J Errico, MD 1st Vice-PresidentJean-Jacques Abitbol, MD 2nd Vice-PresidentRobert G Watkins, MD SecretaryRichard D. Guyer, MD Treasurer

Stanley A Herring, MD Past PresidentEdward C Benzel, MD Clinical Care Council DirectorTom Faciszewski, MD Socioeconomic Council DirectorRobert J Gatchel, PhD Research Council

DirectorHallett H. Mathews, MD Continuing Medical

Education Council DirectorJoel M. Press, MD Membership Services Council Director

Eric Muehlbauer, CAE Executive Director

Page 3: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

councils/committees COUNCILSANDCOMMITTEES

Page 4: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

NASS 18TH ANNUAL MEETINGOctober 21-25, 2003, San Diego, California

The Annual Meeting proved to be a great success yet—demonstrating NASS’ ability to provide high-quality continuingmedical education for its members. Over 800 abstracts weresubmitted for consideration. Final attendance for the meetingreached more than 2,800 participants, a substantial increasefrom the previous year. New for this year was the addition ofa CD-ROM featuring all abtract and symposia slide and audiopresentations.

Attendees had a chance to view the latest technology, productsand services from over 130 companies in the TechnicalExhibit Hall. NASS’ exhibit area continues to grow as moreand more companies find the NASS Annual Meeting to be ofextreme value to advertise and demonstrate their products.With 1,931 exhibitors in attendance, this meeting broke allprevious records. Even with more and more companiesmerging and acquiring each other, the exhibit floor continuesto thrive.

A total of 114 scientific papers and 109 posters werefeatured over the four-day period. Below is a breakdown ofsubmitted abstracts by category.

Category Abstracts % TotalAnatomy/Physiology 27 4%Psychology/Psychosocial 9 1%Epidemiology 31 4%Ergonomics/Industrial 6 1%Diagnostics/Imaging 53 7%Non-operative Treatment 40 5%Biomechanics/Basic Science 177 24%Surgery 395 54%Total 738

Nine symposia focused on operative and nonoperative issues,including: Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatments of SpinalPathologies: A Rational Approach; Failed Back Surgery PartII; Controversies in Lumbar Spine Surgery; Exercise and theSpine; Bone Grafting Technologies: Cells, Factors, and Scaffolds;My Aching Sacroiliac; Adult Scoliosis and Spinal Deformity:Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal PracticeManagement Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization andWhiplash Part II: Treatment.

Many of the 33 topics for Special Interest Group Dis-cussions featured a varied approach to spine care. The highestattended discussions included: The Indications for Cervical andLumbar Disc Replacement; Minimally Invasive Surgery: A NewParadigm or Passing Fad?; Distraction Stabilization-DYNESYS-IS it the Way Ahead for Degenerative Back Pain; CommonCoding and Reimbursement Issues; and Whiplash Injury andSpine Surgery

NASS also offered an increased number of premeetingcourses due to previous success and demand. Coding Update2004: Essentials and Controversies of Operative andNonoperative Spine Care Coding was a two-day intensiveseminar taught by seasoned physician faculty members whohave experience in day-to-day coding and compliance issues.This course officially introduced 2004 coding updates and offereda unique forum for physicians and their coding staff to learn thechanges being implemented in 2004.

A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Essentials of SpineCare provided a general overview of the important areas ofspine care. Faculty presented information on topics that includedeformity, anatomy, degeneration, trauma, and psychology.

Do-It-Yourself – Powerful Presentation with PowerPoint®offered tips and techniques to develop computerized multimediapresentations.

EDUCATIONDirector, Education CouncilHallett H. Mathews, MD, Richmond, VA2003 Scientific Program Committee2003 Co-chairsRichard D. Guyer, MD, Plano, TXStuart M. Weinstein, MD, Seattle, WA2004 Co-chairsZiya Gokaslan, MD, FACS, Baltimore, MDAstaire Selassie, MD, New York, NY2005 Co-chairsJerome Schofferman, MD, Daly City, CAJeffrey C. Wang, MD, Los Angeles, CACME Committee ChairJ. Kenneth Burkus, MD, Columbus, GA2002 Co-chairsJoel M. Press, MD, Chicago, ILEugene J. Carragee, MD, Stanford, CA

2003 Scientific Program ReviewersEdward C. Benzel, MD, Cleveland, OH;Scott D. Boden, MD, Decatur, GA; J.Kenneth Burkus, MD, Columbus, OH;William W. Deardorff, PhD, Beverly Hills,CA; Curtis Dickman, MD Phoenix, AZ; PaulH. Dreyfuss, MD, Bellevue, WA; TomFaciszewski, MD, Marshfield, WI; LisaFerrara, PhD, Cleveland, OH; Mark R.Foster, MD, PhD, Pittsburgh, PA; BruceE. Fredrickson, MD, Syracuse, NY;Robert J. Gatchel, PhD, Dallas, TX; ZiyaL. Gokaslan, MD, FACS, Baltimore, MD;Richard D. Guyer, MD, Plano, TX; ScottA. Haldeman, MD, Santa Ana, CA;Hamilton Hall, MD, Markdale, ON, Canada;Carol Hartigan, MD, Boston, MA; KennethB. Heithoff, MD, St. Louis Park, MN;Michael S. Hisey, MD, Plano, TX; NoshirLangrana, PhD, Piscataway, NJ; IsadorLieberman, MD, Cleveland, OH; GerardA. Malanga, MD, West Orange, NJ; ScottF. Nadler, DO, Newark, NJ; Donna D.Ohnmeiss, PhD, Plano, TX; Bernard A.Pfeifer, MD, Burlington, MA; BartonSachs, MD, Plano, TX; JeromeSchofferman, MD, Daly City, CA; AstaireSelassie, MD, New York, NY; John J.Triano, DC, PhD, Plano, TX; EericTruumees, MD, Southfield, MI; Jeffrey C.Wang, MD, Los Angeles, CA; Stuart M.Weinstein, MD, Seattle, WA; Kenneth S.Yonemura, MD, Syracuse, NY; andJeffrey L. Young, MD, New York, NY

“The 2003 Annual Meeting provided an excellent mix of state-of-the-art surgical andnonsurgical presentations reflecting NASS’ growing multidisciplinary membership.”

- Stuart Weinstein, MD, 2003 Annual Meeting Co-chair

Page 5: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

Total Disc Replacement evaluated the technology of totaldisk replacement of the spine and covered the indications,instrumentation, biomechanics, surgical results of prospectiverandomized studies of over 1000 patients, and post-operativerehabilitation of motion-preserving spinal implants.

What’s New in Spine Grafting Technology and TissueBanking focused on the topic of successful bone grafting,including the most recent advancements and regulatory issuesregarding transplantation of musculoskeletal allograft.

How To Build A Successful Center of Excellence In AnyEnvironment … Academic, Institutional or PrivatePractice focused on strategic planning, operational, marketing,clinical and environmental issues relative to setting upcomprehensive spine/musculoskeletal/neuroscience centers ofexcellence in any setting.

The number of technique workshops increased due to populardemand. Topics included: two Spinal Injections workshops;Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques; PosteriorLumbar Interbody Fusion; Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery:Decompression; Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Fusion/Implants; Cervical Fixation; and Anterior Lumbar InterbodyFusion.

Thanks to our18th Annual Meeting

Corporate SupportersAesculapCenterpulse, Spine-Tech DivisionCortek, Inc.DePuy Spine, a Johnson & Johnson CompanyEBI, LPKYPHON Inc.Medtronic Sofamor DanekMusculoskeletal Transplant FoundationSmith & NephewStryker Spine

Thanks to our 18th Annual Meeting TechniquesWorkshops Corporate Supporters

American Osteomedix, an Interpore Cross CompanyAesculapBryan CorporationCenterpulse, Spine-Tech DivisionCortek, Inc.DePuy Spine, a Johnson & Johnson CompanyEndius, Inc.GE Medical Systems, Inc., Navigation & VisualizationKimberly Clark Health CareKYPHON Inc.Medtronic Sofamor DanekNuVasive, Inc.Orthopedic Systems, Inc.Osteotech, Inc.Richard Wolf Medical InstrumentsStryker/Howmedica OsteonicsStryker InstrumentsSynthes Spine

SPINE ACROSS THE SEAJuly 27-31, 2003, Ritz-Carlton, Kapalua, Maui, Haiwaii

This meeting experienced a record-breaking crowd and theevaluations showed that attendees were quite pleased withthe educational content. The meeting featured 120 papers,70 posters, 4 symposia and a small trade show. While 50%of the attendees came from the U.S., 25% were fromJapan and the other 25% came from all around the world.The exhibit hall sported 26 vendor booths with a total numberof 72 company representatives in attendance. The new SatelliteEvent Guidelines went into effect with this meeting and nettedthe Society an additional $2,500 in revenue. This joint meetingbetween NASS and the Japan Spine Research Society (JSRS)will take place again in 2006.

Spine Across the Sea ProgramCommitteeNASS Program CommitteeCharles Branch, Jr., MD, ChairAlexander Ghanayem, MDJ. Kenneth Burkus, MDNaresh Patel, MDHeidi Prather, DO

JSRS Program CommitteeKatsuji Shimizu, MD, ChairKazuo Yonenobu, MDKuniyoshi Abumi, MDYoshiro Matsuda, MDHisatoshi Baba, MD, DMScYuichi Hoshino, MDKensei Nagata, MD

Planning CommitteeMichael Zindrick, MD, NASS Overall ChairKiyoshi Kaneda, MD, JSRS Overall Chair

JSRS Organizing CommitteeShinya Kawai, MDShoichi Kokubun, MDTatsuo Itoh, MDYoshiaki Toyama, MD

Page 6: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

WORLD SPINE IIAugust 10-13, 2003, Hyatt Regency Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

World Spine II: The Second Interdisciplinary Congress on SpineCare attracted 694 registrants and 76 registered guests. Forty-five countries were represented, with the majority(60%) attending from the United States. The Congressconsisted of three half-day symposia, 240 oral paperpresentations, 215 poster presentations, ten premeetingcourses and a trade show. Evaluations indicated thatattendees were pleased with the educational content of theprogram. World Spine III will be held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazilin August 2005. Subsequent World Spine Congresses will beheld approximately every 18 months around the world.

CODING UPDATE 2003:Essentials and Controversies of Operative andNonoperative Spine Care CodingFebruary 21-22, Jackson Hole, WyomingApril 4-5, Atlanta, Georgia

This two-day interactive, comprehensive coding/reimbursement seminar attracted more than 75attendees. Coding Update 2003 covered pertinent topic areascontained within ICD-9 and CPT-4, complex nuances ofEvaluation & Management, Operative, Nonoperative andRadiology coding, and key elements for assignment ofphysician work reimbursement. Greg Przybylski, MD ledfaculty to discuss relevant coding and compliance topics,including the complex nuances of Evaluation & ManagementCodes (including consultations, operative code series, injectionprocedure codes, controversial spine procedure coding, updateof new code changes for 2003 and a review of an actualworking compliance plan). This seminar series providedphysicians and their staff with an understanding of theimplications and effects of proper coding and contractnegotiation techniques to assist in obtaining appropriatereimbursement.

HANDS-ON COURSES

Interventional Pain Management Techniques: A Hands-On CourseThis course was co-chaired by Jerome Schofferman, MD, DalyCity, CA, and F. Todd Wetzel, MD, Chicago, IL. The workshopwas held January 31-February 1, 2003 at the OrthopaedicLearning Center in Rosemont, Illinois. Although attendance waslower than hoped for with 20 people, attendees enjoyed thecourse. It was scheduled to be held again in 2004.

Surgical Approach and Techniques for the Lumbar Spine:A Hands-On CourseNASS sponsored its third workshop led by program directorsJean-Jacques Abitbol, MD, San Diego, CA and Richard D.Guyer, Plano, TX. The workshop was held March 14-15, 2003at the Presbyterian Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgeryin Plano, TX. The course was limited to 30 participants whotested their skill with the latest lumbar spine techniques. Thispopular course was quickly scheduled to repeat for a fourthyear in March 2004.

Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques: A Hands-OnCourseThis course was held May 16-17, 2003 at the BarrowNeurological Institute in Phoenix, AZ. The program was led byprogram directors Gary Lowery, MD, PhD, Phoenix, AZ andK. Dan Riew, MD, St. Louis, MN. The course sold out withattendance of 45. Attendees were very pleased with the contentand the course was scheduled to repeat in May 2004.

Lumbar Spinal Injections: A Hands-On CourseThis course was held June 20-21, 2003 at the Medical EducationResearch Institute in Memphis, TN. The program was led bySusan Dreyer, MD, Atlanta, GA, Ray Baker, MD, Bellevue,WA, and Gerard Malanga, West Orange, NJ. Attendance forthis course was limited to 40 participants and sold out threemonths beforehand. Evaluations noted that this course wasinvaluable so was added to the schedule to repeat in June 2004.

World Spine II Program Committee

Coding Update 2003 Faculty

Edward C. Benzel, MD ChairpersonKeith H. Bridwell, MDCourtney W. Brown, MDAndrew J. Cole, MDEdward C. CovingtonRonald L. DeWald, MDLisa A. Ferrara, MS, PhDcRichard G. Fessler, MD PhDRegis W. Haid, Jr., MDHallett H. Mathews, MDJoel M. Press, MD

Jerome Schofferman, MDVincent C. Traynelis, MDHansen A. Yuan, MD

Tom Faciszewski, Socioeconomic DirectorNon-operative Coding CommitteeFrancis P. Lagattuta, MD, ChairMichael W. Wolff, MDRay M. Baker, MDW. Bonner Guilford, MDCharles A. Mick, MDConor O’Neill, MDBarry S. Smith, MDWay Yin, MDJoseph P. Zuhosky, MDJoanne S. Willer, Staff LiasionOperative Coding CommitteeStephen E. Heim, MD, ChairDavid M. Arnold, MDAndrew T. Dailey, MDErnest M. Found, Jr., MDRobert J. Gatchel, PhDWilliam C. Horton, MDIsador H. Lieberman, MDAlan Moskowitz, MDKee B. Park, MDGregory J. Przybylski, MDPeter M. Sorini, MD

Coding & Practice ManagementEducation CommitteeStephen E. Heim, MD Co-ChairFrancis P. Lagattuta, MD Co-ChairTimothy L. Alford, PA-CAndrew J. Cole, MDJohn R. Dimar, MDMichael B. Furman, MDDonna M. Lahey, RNP. James Nugent, MD

Page 7: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

The Spine JournalTM

TSJ is one of the few journals accepted for indexing in IndexMedicus/MEDLINE in its second year of publication - atestimony to the unique contribution The Spine Journal (TSJ)makes to the field of spine care and research. The first threevolumes (2001-2003) are already posted, as is the Jan/Feb 2004issue. (Article abstracts will continue to be posted as they areaccepted for publication.) To retrieve the citations use theMEDLINE title abbreviation “Spine J” in the search box onPubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi).

Full-length articles are available to NASS Members andTSJ subscribers. Register your information (NASS I.D. # andpassword) to obtain articles at: http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/SPINEE. Nonmembersmay contact Elsevier Science directly at [email protected],or follow the Elsevier link through PubMed.

With the acceptance into Index Medicus, and throughsolicitation of manuscripts based on winning Abstracts fromWorld Spine II and Spine Across the Sea, manuscriptsubmissions to TSJ have increased. Currently, over 120 reviewarticles, case reports, technical reports and clinicalstudies are in review and revision process. We have also hadan increase in submission of Special Features for TSJ. Dr.David Fardon has continued to complete our fascinatingfeatures, even with the expanded amount of them coming inevery month. We are always happy to receive items for ourFaces of Spine Care, Spine Files and Letters to the Editors.

To submit an article for consideration for publication, followthe instructions at: http://www.spine.org/forms/TSJ_instructions_disclosure.pdf. If you have questions, contactJoy Kenyon at (708) 588-8079 or mailto:[email protected].

“I’m very impressed that The Spine Journal was recognized for its uniquecontribution to the field with acceptance into Index Medicus/Medline.”

- Tom Mayer, MD, Editor-in-Chief, The Spine Journal

The Spine Journal Editorial BoardTom Mayer, MD, Editor-in-Chief

Deputy EditorsHoward An, MDCharles Branch, MDDavid Fardon, MDScott Haldeman, MDNeil Kahanovitz, MD

Associate EditorsNicholas U. Ahn, MDTodd J. Albert, MDJoseph T. Alexander, MDAli Araghi, MDTarcisio E. P. Barros-Filho, MDErnesto Berusky, MDPaul B. Bishop, MDAlan Carl, MDPierre Cote, MDHelton L. A. DeFino, MDRichard G. Ellenbogen, MDJohn G. Finkenberg, MDJeffrey S. Fischgrund, MDMichael D. Freeman, MDAlexander J. Ghanayem, MDJohn A. Glaser, MDJeffrey A. Goldstein, MDPurnendu Gupta, MDAlexander G. Hadjipavlou, MDYong Hai, MDMichael H. Heggeness, MDEric Hurwitz, MDPartap S. Khalsa, MDIsador H. Lieberman, MDJames K. Maguire, MDGerard A. Malanga, MDKoichi Masuda, MDMohamed A. Maziad, MDRobert F. McLain, MDTheodore T. Miller, MDOsmar J. Moraes, MDDaniel L. Morrison, MDDavid R. O’Brien, Jr, MDGerman Ochoa Amaya, MDConor O’Neill, MDLuiz Pimenta, MDGregory J. Przybylski, MDRaj D. Rao, MDRandy F. Rizor, MDHarvinder S. Sandhu, MDJohn Simmons, MDBjorn Stromqvist, MDDaryl R. Sybert, MDCarlos A. Tello, MDJeffrey C. Wang, MDRalf H. Wittenberg, MDKazuo Yonenobu, MDS. Timothy Yoon, MDMichael R. Zindrick, MD

SpineLineTM

“One of the foundations of SpineLine,” wrote Medical EditorStuart M. Weinstein, MD in an editorial at the outset of 2003,“is to confront the status quo, to bring to the table new ideasand controversies — scientific, social, political and economic— that drive us to search for solutions to the questions thatchallenge us all.”

The table was full — and the status quo challenged —throughout the year as SpineLine presented new ideas, tackledcontroversial topics and questioned some longstanding practices.Here’s a recap of the varied and multidisciplinary issues offeredin SpineLine Invited Reviews and cover stories:

• New ideas don’t come any bigger (or, perhaps moreaccurately, smaller) than those presented by RalphMerkle in his fascinating look at health and thearrangement of atoms in “Nanotechnology andNanomedicine” (January/February 2003).

• David Siambanes and Nancy Kishino brought to lightthe consequences of inadvertent loss of lumbar lordosisby surgical intervention in “Preventing Iatrogenic FlatBack Deformity following Lumbosacral Fusions of theDegenerative Spine” (March/April 2003).

• With the caveat that much of the rationale for neckpain treatment is empiric, Gerry Malanga, reviewedthe “Principles and Practice of Neck Pain Rehab”(May/June 2003).

• Yung Chen et al looked at the controversies swirlingaround epidural steroid injections in a comprehensivereview, “Epidural Steriod Injections: Past, Present andFuture” (July/August 2003).

• Larry Khoo and Tooraj Gravori described the evolutionof minimally invasive posterior techniques as a“fundamental paradigm shift in the practice ofcontemporary spinal surgery” in “Minimally Invasive

Page 8: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

Posterior Spinal Decompression and FusionProcedures” (September/October 2003).

• In a roundtable discussion, a panel of experts analyzed“Core Strengthening,” an area of exercise, accordingto Dr. Weinstein, that has generated great marketappeal yet remains generally misunderstood. The paneldiscussed several questions posed to them in thecontext of both nonsurgical and surgical spine careand offered photos of recommended core exercises(November/December 2003).

The Curve/Countercurve feature continues to be one ofSpineLine’s most popular offerings. SpineLine Editors DavidFardon, Jerome Schofferman, Alex Vaccaro and StuartWeinstein orchestrated discussions between experts oncontroversial topics such as:

• “Treating Degenerative Spondylolysthesis andStenosis” Would providers recommend instrumentedor noninstrumented fusion and decompression?

• “Vertebral Osteomyelitis: Operative or NonoperativeTreatment?” Can this condition be best treated withantibiotics and bracing or does it require surgicalintervention?

• “Cervicogenic Headache Treatment” What arediagnosis and treatment options?

• “Cervical Spine Clearance in the Obtunded TraumaPatient” What is required to “clear” the cervical spine?

• “DVT Prophylaxis in the Postop Spine Patient” Whenshould DVT prophylaxis be recommended and whattype?

• “Exercise vs Manual Therapy for Chronic Low BackPain” What diagnosis and course of treatment is inorder for a case of chronic LBP?

Beyond Invited Reviews and Curve/Countercurve, SpineLinepresented regular features and columns including PatientSafety, Literature Review, Abstract Commentary, RadiologyRounds, E-Tech, Practice Management, Coding Q&A, Ethical/Legal, Advocacy, Legislative Affairs/PAC and NASS News.Each issue began with thought-provoking messages from

Medical Editor Stuart Weinstein and NASS President DavidWong.

SpineLine received overwhelming accolades in a ReaderSurvey conducted in 2003. What readers like most, revealedthe survey, is SpineLine’s clinical relevance, pertinence, currenttopics, succinctness and variety.

But even more telling is the ranking that members gave SpineLinein a survey of NASS benefits. When asked to rate benefits ofNASS membership, members identified SpineLine as the #1benefit.

SpineLine’s reputation for quality is attracting the attention ofothers in the spine community as well, including advertisers. In2003, ad pages more than doubled and ad revenue increased45% percent over 2002.

The high esteem with which members and the spine communityregard SpineLine is a result of the hard work of Medical Editor,Stuart M. Weinstein, the 2003 SpineLine Editorial Board,contributors and the NASS staff who are listed here:

Contemporary Concepts in Spine Care

Contemporary Concepts in Spine Care is a series ofreferenced reviews of issues in spine care endorsed by theNASS Board of Directors. Each paper is reviewed extensivelyby the Contemporary Concepts Committee, approved by theboard and published in The Spine Journal before it is added tothe series. Two new papers were added in 2003:

• “Cervical Myelopathy: Current Diagnostic andTreatment Strategies,”

• “Intervertebral Cages for Degenerative SpinalDisease”

Several papers were developed and approved by theContemporary Concepts Committee during 2003 and are

SpineLine Editorial BoardStuart M. Weinstein, MD, MedicalEditorAlexander R. Vaccaro, MD, DeputyMedical Editor

Section EditorsDavid Bagnall, MDScott Boden, MDKenneth P. Burres, MDAleksander Curcin, MDLinda Park D’Andrea, MDSusan Dreyer, MDDavid F. Fardon, MDRobert J. Gatchel, PhDHamilton Hall, MDKenneth B. Heithoff, MDRichard T. Holt, MDA. Eugene Pennisi, MAJerome Schofferman, MDPaul J. Slosar, MDRobert A. Watkins, MDJim A. Youssef, MD

Regular ContributorsDavid A. Wong, MD, FRCS(C)Stanley A. Herring, MDDonald L. Renfrew, MDStephen H. Hochschuler, MDAnnette Grady, CPC, CPC-HHoward Morgan, MD, MA, FACSMarjorie Eskay-Auerbach, MD, JDEric J. Muehlbauer, CAETom Faciszewski, MD

Contemporary Concepts CommitteeAlexander R. Vaccaro, MD ChairpersonJames P. Argires, MD,FACSGordon D. Donald, MDLawrence W. Frank, MDAlan S. Hilibrand, MDScott F. Nadler, DO, FACSMTushar Patel, MDJeffrey C. Wang, MD

Page 9: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

scheduled for publication after appearing in The Spine Journalin 2004. These include:

• “Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation”• “Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Cervical Spine”• “Psyschotropic Medication in Chronic Spinal

Disorders”• “Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty”• “Nonoperative and Operative Treatment of the

Osteoporotic Spine”

Thanks go to the many authors who researched and wrotethese comprehensive papers. For a complete listing and anorder form, call (708) 588-8080 or visit the NASS Web site athttp://www.spine.org/forms/cc_order_form.pdf

Clinical Guidelines

NASS continues its development of Phase III clinical guidelinesrelated to the diagnosis and treatment of spinal disorders. Theseguidelines are developed as educational tools for multidis-ciplinary spine care professionals to improve patient care byoutlining reasonable information-gathering and decision-makingprocesses used in the management of spine pain in adults.

NASS’ newest clinical guideline, Neck Pain and AssociatedCervical Syndromes, is nearly completed and will be availablein late 2004. The four lumbar guidelines are also slated forrevision in 2005. Abstracts of NASS’ guidelines are availableon the National Guideline Clearinghouse (http://www.guidelines.gov). In addition, NASS continues tostrengthen its commitment to multidisciplinary care andrelationships through representation to the AANS lumbar fusionclinical guideline project, the AAOS revision of Phase I and IIlow back algorithms and the US Bone and Joint Decade TaskForce on Neck Pain.

The Phase I and II algorithms were jointly developed by NASSand the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and arecurrently being updated.

Phase III is developed by NASS and represents comprehensivecare from primary to chronic multidisciplinary treatment. Eachdocument is intended as a stand-alone guideline incorporatingthe principles of acute (Phase I) and post-acute (Phase II)care. Issues such as specific time frames for treatment,coordination of definitions of common practice terms, definitionof end points for treatment and treatment success or failureare examples of areas covered. Low back guidelines for thediagnoses of herniated disc, unremitting low back pain, spinalstenosis and spondylolisthesis are available. All have beensubmitted to the National Guideline Clearinghouse (http://www.guidelines.gov), where abstracts can be viewed.

Phase III clinical guidelines can be purchased by the disease-specific unit or as a complete set. To order, call (877) SpineDror download the order form from the NASS Web site at http://www.spine.org/forms/clinguidordfm.pdf.

NASS Archives

The NASS Archives Task Force is charged with the collectionand archiving of NASS historical documents and artifacts andcreate a museum dedicated to the history of spine care.

Spine History on the Internet can be found on the NASSWeb site at http://www.spine.org/spinecarehistory.cfm. On thesame link, the historical SpinePosts from The Spine Journalwere added to the Archives page of the NASS Web site. Otherbenefits include an educational exhibit at the annual meetingand the Signature Edition Collection, a special collection ofbooks related to spine care and education.

Clinical Guidelines Task Force WorkGroupEdward C Benzel, MD Clinical Care Council DirectorWilliam Charles Watters, III, MD ChairpersonTom G Mayer, MD Co-ChairPaul Jon Apostolides, MDRobert C Cantu, MD FACSThomas J Gilbert, MDWoodrow W Janese, MD FACSJeffrey M Spivak, MD

Clinical Guidelines Advisory PanelRonald G. Donelson, MDJoseph Flood, MDMichael B. Furman, MDScott Haldeman, MDHarry N. Herkowitz, MDRobert J. Martin, MDPeter Polatin, MDJeffrey A. Saal, MD, FACPLloyd R. Saberski, MDJeffrey Susman, MDDennis C. Turk, PhD

Executive Advisory Panel ClinicalGuidelinesThomas J Errico, MDDavid F. Fardon, MDStanley A Herring, MDVolker K H Sonntag, MD

Archives Task ForceJoel M. Press, MD Membership Services Council DirectorGalen R. Smith, MD ChairpersonLeon L. Wiltse, MDGeorge WIlliam Wood, II, MD

“NASS’ new cervical guideline won’t be just another ‘pain in the neck.’ We’re working tocreate credible new guidelines and maintain a balance of multispecialty representation.”

- William Watters, MD, Clinical Guidelines Chair

Page 10: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

RESEARCH Compendium of Outcome Instruments forAssessment & Research of Spinal Disorders

Compiled by editor Robert J. Gatchel, PhD and a panel ofauthors, this indispensable resource contains valuableinformation not compiled elsewhere, including:

• More than 100 peer-reviewed critiques of variousoutcome assessment instruments by multidisciplinaryresearchers.

• A wide range of paper-based questionnaires, as wellas physical instrumentation-based outcomeassessment instruments.

• Valuable contact and reference information for eachoutcome assessment instrument.

• An appendix including sample copies of the majorityof instruments critiqued, such as the SF-36, MBHI,McGill Pain Questionnaire, DSM-IV and Cal-FCP.

• Visual examples and measurement specifications areincluded for each of the physical instrumentation-based outcome assessment instruments.

Nearly 100 instruments are reviewed for strengths/weaknesses, reliability/reproducibility and application. Eachreview is supported by a list of publications and the source ofthe instrument. For an order form, call the NASS office at(877) SpineDr or download from the NASS Web site at http://www.spine.org/forms/outcomesordfm.pdf.

Research & Clinical Care Section

The Research (Robert J. Gatchel, PhD, Director) and ClinicalCare (Edward Benzel, MD, Director) Councils continue tomonitor and work on issues of scientific importance to themembership through a variety of venues. In 2003, theseincluded:

• Development of content for patient educationbrochures, clinical guidelines, ContemporaryConcepts, SpineLine and the Web site.

• Creation of a new Alternative & ComplementaryMedicine Committee.

• Development of criteria to evaluate NASS researchcollaboration in a fair and objective manner.

• Successful incorporation of some comments into theFDA Public Health Notification, ComplicationsRelated to the Use of Bone Cement in TreatingCompression Fractures of the Spine.

• Representation on the US Bone & Joint DecadeResearch Committee.

• Ongoing development of three position papers on off-label use.

• Literature review and rating of the research status ofbone morphogenetic protein.

Research Priorities

Every three years NASS surveys the membership to determineits research priorities. An extensive list of research topics ofinterest can be obtained from the NASS Web site at http://www.spine.org/Research/research_priorities.cfm or bycontacting the NASS Research Department.

Top Three Topics of Interest:1) Determine the natural history of back pain and various spine

diseases, including disc herniation and stenosis.2) Study the effect of fusion on adjacent segments.3) Determine the role of fusion in spine surgery, including

technical aspects and complications.

2003 Research Grants & Fellowships

The Research Project Management Committee received 32research grant proposals and three clinical traveling fellowshipapplications in 2003. The following research grants and clinicaltraveling fellowship were funded totaling $187,876.38.

Robert J Gatchel, PhD Research Council DirectorEdward C Benzel, MD Clinical Care Council Director

Research Fund Management CommitteePaul M. Arnold, MDDonald W. Kucharzyk, DORobert F. McLain, MDPhilip L. Schneider, MDRobert Windsor, MD

Research Project Management CommitteeMarjorie Eskay-Auerbach, MD, JD, ChairpersonMichael H Heggeness, MD PhD, ChairpersonFrank M Phillips, MDJonathan L Schaffer, MDPaul J Slosar, MDMolly T Vogt, PhDWilliam C Welch, MDVenu Akuthota, MDSusan Dreyer, MDW. Craig Clark, MD PhD FACSClifford Richard Everett, MDRobert W Irwin, MDDennis J Maiman, MDDavid W Polly, Jr., MDJames Rainville, MDMark Weidenbaum, MD

Page 11: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

The Role of the p75 Neurotrophin Receptor in the Deathof Neurons and Glia after Spinal Cord InjuryPrincipal Investigator: Michael G. Fehlings, MD, PhD, FRCSCAward: $89,426.38

Fatty Acid Mediated Transfection of PotentiallyTherapeutic Genes in Human Intervertebral DiscChondrocytesPrincipal Investigator: Paul A. Anderson, MDAward: $50,000.00

Tumor/stromal Interactions in a Bone Marrow PrecursorDerived Bone Model of Metastatic Spinal DiseasePrincipal Investigator: James M. Schuster, MD, PhDAward: $36,800.00

Clinical Traveling FellowshipAndrew Moulton, MDAward: $11,650.00

NASS/ The Spine Journal Outstanding Paper Awards

19 entries were received for the 15th NASS Outstanding PaperAwards in 2003. Categories were in basic science, nonoperativecare and surgical science. One winner from each categorywas chosen. Papers were presented at the 18th Annual Meetingin San Diego, received $9,000 each and appeared in the firstissue of the 2004 volume of TSJ. The 2003 winners for theNASS Outstanding Paper Awards were:

Transplantation of Oligodendrocyte Precursors and SonicHedgehog Results in Improved Function and White MatterSparing in the Spinal Cords of Adult Rats After ContusionNicholas C. Bambakidis M.D. and Robert H. Miller Ph.D.

The Effect of Alendronate Sodium on Spinal Fusion: ARabbit ModelRonald A. Lehman, Jr., MD, Timothy R. Kuklo, MD, BrettA. Freedman, MD, Jerry R. Cowart, DVM, Mark G. Mense,DVM and K. Daniel Riew, MD

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of IntradiscalElectrothermal Therapy (IDET) for the Treatment ofDiscogenic Low Back Pain.Kevin J. Pauza, MD, Susan Howell BS, RN , Paul DreyfussMD, John H. Peloza MD, Kathryn Dawson PhD, andNikolai Bogduk MD, DSc.

Spine Surgery Research Study

The Spine Surgery Research Study, retrospectively examiningfive-year, post-surgical outcomes of virgin discectomy patientson a multicenter basis, concluded in 2003. This smalldemonstration study yielded base data that is currently underreview and spawned development of a complementary studyexamining the same topic on a prospective basis.

Complications Data Registry

The Research Council has been actively working to develop adata registry for complications. The NASS NationalComplications Data Registry is a multicenter database registryfor complications related to various treatments and procedures.It will be a resource for NASS members to track complicationsof emerging technologies. Through a pilot study, the registrycollected complications for kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty, IDETand cages; results were presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting.Refinements are currently being made before the registry isopened to the general membership.

Recognition and Awards CommitteeEugene J Carragee, MD ChairpersonNevan G. Baldwin, MD, PAWilliam R Boulden, MDAndrew B Dossett, MDSteven R. Garfin, MDZiya L Gokaslan, MD,FACSBarry S Smith, MD

Dennis J Maiman, MD

“Tthe 2003 Outstanding Paper Award recipients presented timely and controversialstudies and generated excellent discussion and debate among the spine community.”

- Eugene Carragee, MD, Recognition and Awards Committee Chair

Page 12: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

SPORT Position Statement

Through the Research Council, a position statement wasdeveloped on the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial(SPORT). In view of the fact that the results of this comparativestudy of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment could have asignificant impact on spine patients and their care, and in thespirit of scientific discourse, NASS provided comment on themethodology. It is NASS’ hope that its comments willstrengthen the study and those that follow it, and help spinecare providers in interpreting the final study results. NASSdoes not favor one approach over the other but, like theSPORT authors, is in search of the best scientifically-provenapproaches for patients. The SPORT position statement waspublished in The Spine Journal, and can be found on theNASS Web site at http://www.spine.org/Forms/SPORT_pos_stmt.pdf.

Research FundingAnnual Research Fund (ARF)

The Annual Research Fund draws support from NASSmembers and companies in the spine care industry to fundtop-priority, high quality spine-related research. Contributionsare distributed to fund research in the same year as they arereceived at the Annual Meeting. Projects are selected by theResearch Project Management Committee. NASS absorbsall administrative costs for this program with 100% of eachcontribution supporting the highest-quality, peer-reviewedresearch.

The following corporations and individuals invested in the futureof spine care through the Annual Research Fund in 2003.

Corporate DonorsEBIKyphon Inc.

Individual DonorsLegacy Society(Donations of $5,000 or more)Hallet H. Mathews, MDTom G. Mayer, MD

Leaders’ Circle($2,000 to $4,999)J. Kenneth Burkus, MDRichard Derby, MDKarl Fournier, MD, FRCSKee B. Park, MDK. Daniel Riew, MDGil Tepper, MD, FACS

Patrons’ Club($1,000 to $1,999)Marc Addason Asher, MDArimed OrthopedicsCharles L. Branch, MDLuis E. Crespo, MDDavid W. Florence, MDAlexander J. Ghanayem, MDJ. Michael Glover, MDJames Jay Harms, MDThomas R. Highland, MDAlan S. Hilibrand, MDChristopher C. Kain, MD, AAOS, PCDon Allen Kovalsky, MDIsador H. Lieberman, MDDennis and Donnalyn Maiman Philanthropic FundBrian E. McCarthy, MDPierce Dalton Nunley, MDEric D. Phillips, MDKevin A. Rahn, MDBurt E. Schell, III, MDThomas C. Schuler, MD

Patient Safety Task Force Work GroupDavid A. Wong, MD,MSc,FRCS(C), ChairpersonStanley A Herring, MD, Co-chairRobert C Cantu, MD FACSRobert F Heary, MDTom G Mayer, MDWilliam A Sims, MDJeffrey M Spivak, MDWilliam Charles Watters, III, MD

Stuart M Weinstein, MD

Surgical Care CommitteeAnthony T. Yeung, MD, ChairpersonPaul M Arnold, MDEung-Jun Cha, MDRoland F Chalifoux, Jr., DOAndrew B Dossett, MDMark B. Gerber, MDCarol Hartigan, MDIsador H Lieberman, MDChaim Rogozinski, MD

Nonoperative Care CommitteeJerome Schofferman, MD, ChairpersonRonald G Donelson, MDThomas E. Dreisinger, PhDMarjorie Eskay-Auerbach, MD, JDLawrence W Frank, MDMichael C Geraci, Jr., MD,PTPerry L Haney, MD DCDavid A Hanscom, MDRichard Herzog, MD,FACRGarrett Kine, MDTerry C Sawchuk, MDRaj M. Singh, MDPablo Vazquez-Seoane, MDSidney L Wallace, MD

F. Todd Wetzel, MD

Page 13: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

Karen Talmadge, PhDScott G. Tromanhauser, MDThomas R. Walsh, MDDavid A. Wong, MD, MSc, FRCS(C)

Supporter($500 to$999)Paul A. Anderson, MDRoberto J. Aranibar, MDPaul L. Asdourian, MDRay M. Baker, MDWilliam Barrick, MDR. David Bauer, MDAlfred O. Bonati, MDKevin C. Booth, MDJesse P. Butler, MDAndrew Cappuccino, MDJason D. Cohen, MDSanford E. Emery, MDRobert J. Gatchel, PhDE.J. Hanson, MDMississippi Pain ManagementBernard A. Pfeifer, MDPhilip L. Schneider, MDJohn E. Sherman, MDArnold Graham Smith, MDRudolph F. Taddonio, MDJorge E. Tijmes, MDLarry T. Todd, Jr., DOJohn F. Toton, MDWay Yin, MDJim A. Youssef, MD

Donor(Up to $499)Jean-Jacques Abitbol, MDBehrooz A. Akbarnia, MD

J. Scott Bainbridge, MDKathleen H. Baker, BSN, RN, MBA, CCRNGordon R. Bell, MDPeleg Ben-Galim, MDBenjamin Blair, MDTimothy R. Borman, DORobert H. Bradley, MDWilliam A. Bruck, MDRobert A. Callahan, MDRichard A. Caner, MDHarold CarrisonDavid R. Chandler, MDJen-Yuh Chen, MDJeffrey Dean Coe, MDAndrew J. Cole, MDArthur H. Conley, MDDavid L. Coran, MDAnthony R. Cucuzzella, MDJesse G. Eisler, MD, PhDC. Ricardo Estrada, DOAlex Hossein Etemad, MDBruce E. Fredrickson, MDSteven R. Garfin, MDFred Geisler, MD, PhDRobert B. Gledhill, MDMichael W. Hasz, MDCameron B. Huckell, MDSteven Craig Humphreys, MDRobert W. Irwin, MDMark B. Kerner, MDJerry Knirk, MDWally Krengel, MDKenneth B. Kurica, MDJoseph M. Lane, MDSteven D. Lasser, MDKevin Jon Lawson, MDRichard D. Lazar, MDJames M. Loddengaard, MD

Page 14: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

Jack F. Loupe, MDDaniel B. Marcus, MDO. James May, PA-CAnne Marie McKenzie-Brown, MDGlenn L. Momberger, MDEric Muehlbauer, CAELynn M. Nelson, MDGomez Jesus Ortiz, MDStephen Ozanne, MDGerard M. Papp, DOFrank M. Phillips, MDDavid W. Polly, Jr., MDGregory J. Przybylski, MDRajiv Puri, MDJames Sabshin, MDArnold M. Schwartz, MDThirumoorthi V. Seshan, MDEdward D. Simmons, MDEdward H. Simmons, MDRobert Simon, MDRichard C. Smith, MDRenzo Sodini, MDJeffrey T. Summers, MDJames C. Thomas, Jr., MDHuy D. Trinh, MDRichard Vaughan, FRCS, FRACSTheodore A. Wagner, MDAlexis M. Waguespack, MDWar Memorial HospitalMarc A. Weinstein, MDJames C. Weis, MDJames J. White, MDKenneth S. Yonemura, MD

Spine Research Foundation (SRF)

Because the Annual Research Fund distributes all the moneyit collects throughout the year, NASS recognized the needfor a more permanent source of funding for spine-relatedresearch. As a result, NASS established the Spine ResearchFoundation in 1996. The Spine Research Foundation is anendowment fund that will fund spine care research inperpetuity. Contributions to the fund will remain untouched.The interest income accrued each year on the principal willsupplement the amount NASS distributes through the AnnualResearch Fund.

As more and more leaders in the field of spine recognizeSRF as the ideal vehicle for their estate plans and plannedgiving efforts, the Foundation will continue to grow. SRF willprovide substantial, permanent funding for the research thatis at the heart of every technique and procedure employedto bring relief and healing to spine patients.

The following corporations and individuals invested in thefuture of spine care through the Spine Research Foundationin 2003.

Corporate DonorsBiosystems, Inc.DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson CompanyKyphon, Inc.Medtronic Sofamor DanekSmith & Nephew

Individual DonorsFounder’s Level ($20,000+)

Titanium Level($5,000-$9,999)Hansen A. Yuan, MD

Page 15: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

Gold Level($2,500-$4,999)J. Kenneth Burkus, MDGil Tepper, MD, FACS

Silver Level($1,000 to $2,499)Marc Addason Asher, MDThomas J. Errico, MDRichard D. Guyer, MDScott Haldeman, MDE.J. Hanson, MDIsador H. Lieberman, MDNorman B. Livermore, III, MD, FACSNew York Community Trust James Talcott FundPierce Dalton Nunley, MDJoel M. Press, MDK. Daniel Riew, MDHarvinder S. Sandhu, MDClayton E. Turner, MD

Bronze Level(Up to $999)Howard S. An, MDMark Bernhardt, MDRichard A. Caner, MDAndrew Cappuccino, MDEung-Jun Cha, MDJen-Yuh Chen, MDAndrew J. Cole, MDSanford E. Emery, MDAlex Hossein Etemad, MDRichard G. Fessler, MD, PhDDavid R. Hicks, MDGregory A. Hoffman, MDJohn P. Kostuik, MDDaniel B. Marcus, MD

Sean E. McCance, MDKevin J. McGuire, MD, MSCEGeorge S. Miz, MDEric Muehlbauer, CAEJacob Nerubay, MDEugene J. Nordby, MDSaid G. Osman, MDKee B. Park, MDThomas V. Rieser, MDRichard C. Smith, MDJohn C. Steinmann, DOJeffrey T. Summers, MDJeffrey M. Sumner, MDLarry T. Todd, Jr., DORichard Vaughan, FRCS, FRACSWilliam Charles Watters, III, MDWilliam C. Welch, MD

Partners in SpineGifts through OREF

Spine care professionals who contribute to the OrthopedicResearch and Education Foundation (OREF) can designate aportion of their gifts to NASS. This cooperative effort affordstwo benefits: 1) the convenience of supporting two outstandingresearch funding organizations, and 2) public recognition fromboth NASS and OREF. Thanks to these Partners in Spine:

Behrooz A. Akbarnia, MDGunnar Andersson, MDMarc Asher, MDGail Benson, MDFrank Berklacich, MDScott D. Boden, MDChristopher Bono, MDDavid Bortel, In Memory of John Echold, Jr.John Braun, MDCourtney Brown, MDJ. Byrd, MD

Page 16: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

Frank P. Cammisa, MDMichael Chapman, MDMichael Daubs, MDWilliam F. Donaldson, MDCraig Dopf, MDThomas L. Dopson, MDEugene Eline, DOThomas Errico, MDStephen Faust, MDFlorida Spine InstituteGerard J. Foti, DOErnest Found, MDGeorge Frey, MDBruce Fredrickson, MDJonathan Fuller, MDSteven Garfin, MDThomas Gleason, MD, In Memory of John P. Kostuik, MDDavid Hicks, MDPaul Ho, MDEdward Katz, MDMichael Kornblatt, MD, In Memory of Jack KornblattWally Krengel, MDAlan LongertRoss Lynch, MDCarl D. Maguire, MDMark Malberg, MDJames Maxwell, MDChristopher B. Michelsen, MDGregory Misenhimer, MDRichard Nasca, MDEric Phillips, MDMitchell Reiter, MDRoberta Rose, MDJeffrey Sabin, MDWilliam Samuelson, MDHarvinder S. Sandhu, MDArnold Schwartz, MD, In Memory of Daniel S. SchwartzRobert L. Sendele, In Memory of E. Shannon Stauffer, MDWilliam Sims, MD, In Memory of Sybil CraneMichael Swank, MDMichael Vives, MD

Jerald Waldman, MDThomas Walsh, MDScott Webb, DOJames C. Weis, MDHansen Yuan, MD

Methods of Giving

In addition to cash gifts, some donors may wish to consideralternate methods of supporting the future of spine researchthrough NASS. These options allow donors to match moreclosely their desire to secure the future of spine-related researchto the amount they are able to contribute.

Gifts of Securities offer the donor a double tax benefit. Donorscan deduct the full fair market value of their appreciated assets(if owned more than one year). Donors save again by avoidingall capital gains taxes on the paper profit on this investment.Mutual fund shares can be contributed to the North AmericanSpine Society with the same beneficial effects. You shouldalso note that if you own stock that has gone down in value, youcan sell the stock, donate the proceeds to NASS and receive agift deduction as well as a capital loss deduction. You shouldcontact your financial advisor for additional information andguidance on a gift of securities.

Gifts of Life Insurance can be used to maximize your supportof NASS and perpetuate your values beyond your lifetime.Here is an example. If you purchased a $50,000 policy yearsago before your children were independent, let’s assume thatthe cash surrender value of your policy is $20,000 and the annualpremium is $500. If you contribute the policy to NASS andcontinue paying the premiums, you will be entitled to an incometax charitable deduction of about $20,000. Each year you willalso be entitled to another $500 deduction for the annualpremiums you pay. Ultimately, the full $50,000 value of thepolicy will go directly to the NASS research programs. Thereare also other methods of using life insurance to make ameaningful gift. Please talk to your financial advisor.

Page 17: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

Patient Safety

NASS’ commitment to advocate on behalf of spine patientscontinues on as it provides patient safety resources to themembership. In 2003, these efforts included:

• Bringing the membership Annual Meeting PresidentialGuest Speaker and internationally recognized air safetyanalyst and advocate, John J. Nance.

• Patient Safety 101. This free PowerPoint™presentation with speaker’s notes, referencesand handouts is useful in teaching the basictenets of patient safety.

• Providing comments to the FDA on the dietarysupplement ephedra.

• Endorsement and participation in the development ofthe JCAHO Universal Protocol For Preventing WrongSite, Wrong Procedure, Wrong Person Surgery.

• Spine Safety Alerts on counterfeit ProCrit® and NASS’endorsement of the JCAHO universal protocol.

• A new patient education brochure on EvaluatingMedical Information on the Internet.

NASS also produced a dedicated patient safety column in eachissue of SpineLine. The NASS Web Site Patient Safety Page(http://www.spine.org/patientsafety.cfm) contains NASS’position on medical error reporting and various NASS patientsafety resources including past SpineLine articles, the Sign,Mark & X-ray program, patient education and Spine SafetyAlerts. Other patient safety links are also available with articles,reports and tools. NASS also monitors a variety of governmentresources for patient safety related notices that may be usefulto spine care practitioners. Spine Safety Alerts are distributedvia e-mail and then posted on the NASS Web site at http://www.spine.org/spine_safety_notices.cfm.

Advocacy CommitteeTom Faciszewski, MD, ChairpersonFrancis P Lagattuta, MDCharles A Mick, MDJoel M. Press, MDGregory J Przybylski, MDWilliam A Sims, MD

Advocacy

Page 18: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

2003 Membership Report

As the North American Spine Society approaches its 20th

anniversary, more than 3,800 specialists around the worldare members of this leading multidisciplinary society in thespine field. With a heavy concentration in North America(approx. 3,300 in the United States, 6 in Mexico and 50 inCanada), our list of members residing outside of NorthAmerica continues to grow in countries including: Argentina,Australia, Austria, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Czech Republic,Denmark, Egypt, England, France, Germany, Greece, India,Iran, Iraq, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, the Netherlands,Republic of China, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Singapore, SouthAfrica, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland,Thailand, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and Venezuela.

Categories of MembershipThere are six categories of membership in the North AmericanSpine Society:

Active (68%)Active members are ABMS board certified MDs,DOs, and PhDs who devote at least 50 percent oftheir professional activities to spine disorders.Associate (7%)Board eligible MDs and DOs, as well as PhDcandidates, in the area of spine.Affiliate (6%)Include allied health care professionals involved inspine care, as well as individuals involved in spineresearch/development.Corresponding (7%)Health care professionals who are not permanentresidents of North America.

Emeritus (5%)Active members who have been society members forat least five years and have retiredfrom the practice of medicine or have reached the ageof 65.In Training (6%)Residents and fellows training in the field of spine.

Specialty RepresentationNASS welcomed more than 500 members in 2003, largely dueto our recruitment efforts. Specialties represented inmembership include:orthopedic surgeryneurosurgeryphysiatrypain man-agement and medicineradiologybasic and applied researchneurologyanesthesiologypractice admin-istration/managementchiropractic carepsychiatry/psychologyfamily practicephysical/occupational therapyrheumatologyneuroradiologysports medicineanatomic/clinical pathologyemergency medicinecritical caregeriatric medicinegeneral and vascular surgerymusculoskeletal oncologypediatrics trauma surgery

Membership Review CommitteeJoel M. Press, MD Membership Services Council DirectorElizabeth F Yurth, MD ChairpersonRobert G Watkins, MD Ex-OfficioAllan J. Belzberg, MDVincent J. Devlin, MDDavid R. Lange, MDCharles I. Salzberg, MDBarry S. Smith, MDPeter M. Sorini, MDChristopher J. Standaert, MD

NASS expects towelcome its 4,000th

member during our20th Anniversary in 2005

“The fact that NASS continues to see exponential growth attests to the unique nicheit has carved out in the spine care field.”

- Elizabeth Yurth, Member Review Committee Chair

Page 19: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

In Recognition of Outstanding Contributions tothe Field of Spine Care

Recognition awards, named for NASS Founding Members,are presented each year at the NASS Annual Meeting. Thefollowing awards were given in 2003:

David Selby Award: For excellence inleadership and/or research in the field ofspine surgery. Prsented to Steven Garfin,MD

Henry Farfan Award: For outstandingcontributions to the field of spine care,especially in biomechanics or nonoperativespine care. Presented to BrianCunningham, MSc

Leon Wiltse Award: For a member whohas contributed greatly to the art and scienceof spinal disorder management throughservice to NASS. Presented to Scott Boden,MD

Members Meriting Recognition in 2003:

• Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach, MD, JD, Chair, ResearchPlanning - Development of NASS Criteria forCollaboration with Outside Entities - Representativeto the US Bone & Joint Decade Research Committee

• William Watters, III, MD, Co-Chair, Clinical Guidelines- Development of new cervical guideline - Representativeto US Bone & Joint Decade Neck Pain Task Force -Representative to AAOS Evidence-based MedicineCommittee - Representative to AANS Lumbar FusionGuideline Project

• David Wong, MD, Continuing dedication to patientsafety.- Bringing in John Nance as Presidential GuestSpeaker-Spearheading our representation to JCAHO andAAOS in patient safety arenas.

• Ed Benzel, MD, Oversight of the Clinical Care Counciland in particular, has been instrumental in coordinatingNASS and AANS guidelines relationships

• Robert Gatchel, PhD, Oversight of the Research Council- Development of the SPORT review - Driving NASS’research studies forward (Spine Surgery Research Study,Complications Data Registry)

Page 20: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

North American Spine SocietyNational Association of Spine Specialists

Consolidated Statement of Financial Positionas of Dec. 31, 2003 and Dec. 31, 2002

12/31/03 12/31/02

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETSCash and cash equivalents $1,455,133 $430,863Accounts receivable (net of reserve for doubtful accounts) 241,971 181,786Pledges receivable 134,000 117,450Other receivables 34,560 60,496Deposits and prepaid expenses 179,457 358,681Inventory 95,754 85,220 Total current assets 2,140,875 1,234,496

INVESTMENTS - at market value 1,130,181 1,184,816

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - net of depreciation 836,668 869,399

Total assets $4,388,216 $3,288,711

LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS

CURRENT LIABILITIESAccounts payable $390,354 $333,247Accrued expenses 161,008 154,967Deferred income 236,583 120,270 Total current liabilities 787,945 608,484

NET ASSETSUnrestricted 2,467,376 2,028,514Permanently restricted 852,403 651,713 Total net assets 3,319,779 2,680,227

Total Liabilities and net assets $4,388,216 $3,288,711

Page 21: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:

North American Spine SocietyNational Association of Spine Specialists

Combined Statement of Activitiesfor the Years Ended Dec. 31, 2003 and Dec. 31, 2002

2003 2002

INCOMEDues and fees $1,249,554 $1,038,164Sales - publications and advertising 185,464 208,693Educational Programs 4,963,610 3,348,043Sponsorships and support contributions 1,300,677 788,596Royalties 62,166 65,548Investment income/(losses) 191,582 (58,066)World Spine Society 15,848Other income/(losses) 8,436 8,436

Total income 7,968,901 5,399,414

EXPENSESMember Services 313,404 490,336Publications 717,390 476,342Grants and awards 225,276 192,318Research and Scientific Affairs 299,891 261,757Educational programs 3,786,622 2,138,003Advocacy 1,211,861 784,744World Spine Society 38,149Fundraising 32,604 289,015Management and general 704,151 565,370

Total expenses 7,329,348 5,197,885

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS 639,553 201,529

Net assets - beginning of year 2,680,227 2,478,698Net assets - end of year $3,319,780 $2,680,227

Page 22: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:
Page 23: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II:
Page 24: NORTH AMERICAN PINE SOCIETY DUCATION ADVOCACY...Assessment and Reconstruction; Providing Optimal Practice Management Efficiency for Your Spine Care Organization and Whiplash Part II: