7
CLINICAL REPORT Ocular Pterygium—Digital Keloid Dysplasia Hugo Abarca, 1y Anne E Christensen Mellgren, 2,3y Milana Trubnykova, 1 Olav H. Haugen, 2,3 Gunnar Høvding, 2,3 Ka ˚re Steinar Tveit, 4 Gunnar Houge, 3,5 Cecilie Bredrup, 2,5 and Raoul C Hennekam 6 * 1 Instituto Nacional de Salud del Nino, Lima, Peru 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway 3 Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway 4 Department of Dermatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway 5 Center for Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway 6 Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children’s Hospital and Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Manuscript Received: 3 March 2014; Manuscript Accepted: 3 July 2014 We describe an adolescent Peruvian male with marked, aggres- sive ingrowth of conjunctiva (pterygium-like) over the cornea associated with keloid formation on his distal limbs. He has in addition camptodactyly of all fingers and to some extent of his toes, and unusual skin pigmentations. He resembles an earlier described family from Norway in which a mother and two children showed a similar combination of signs. We present the follow-up of the Norwegian family. The entity resembles the Penttinen syndrome but can be differentiated due to the early aging in the latter, which is lacking in the presently reported entity. We suggest naming this entity ocular pterygium–digital keloid dysplasia. The condition follows likely an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Ó 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Key words: keloid; childhood ocular pterygium; camptodactyly; autosomal dominant INTRODUCTION Keloid formation can be defined as increased scar tissue formation not being in accordance to the trauma. Keloids may impair function by restriction of the skin and decrease of joint mobility, can be aesthetically disfiguring, and may cause intense symptomatic dis- tress due to the itching and pain, which often accompanies keloids. Keloids do not occur frequently in syndromes and if they occur together with other manifestations, they are located at upper thorax, shoulders and upper arms, which are also the predilection sites of isolated keloids. In 1998 Haugen and Bertelsen [1998] reported on a mother and two sons with ingrowth of conjunctival tissue that gradually covered the whole cornea and progressive keloid formation in their hands and fingers. A single family with possibly the same entity has been reported since [Balaji et al., 1991; Booth and Hodgkins, 2006]. Here we report on a patient from a second family with very similar findings, and provide an update on the family reported by Haugen and Bertelsen. We suggest naming this entity ocular pterygium- digital keloid dysplasia. CLINICAL REPORT The proband was the fifth child of nonconsanguineous Peruvian parents. There are several persons in the family with ocular pterygia: the parents of the proband are both construction workers. Father developed pterygia from the age of 30 years and mother had minor pterygia from the age of about 20 years. Neither has undergone surgery. Mother has one brother who underwent successful surgery for his pterygia. There are no other known eye diseases in the family, and no one is known to have keloid formation. The proband is the fifth child of these parents. Their first children were twins born at 8 months weighing 2700 g. Both died in infancy, How to Cite this Article: Abarca H, Mellgren AEC, Trubnykova M, Haugen OH, Høvding G, Tveit KS, Houge G, Bredrup C, Hennekam RC. 2014. Ocular pterygium—digital keloid dysplasia. Am J Med Genet Part A 164A:2901–2907. Conflict of interest: None y Hugo Abarca and Anne E Christensen Mellgren have contributed equally to the manuscript. Grant sponsor: Western Norway Regional Health Authority; Grant numbers: 911466, 911688. Correspondence to: Dr Raoul C Hennekam, Department of Pediatrics, Room 7-236, AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam. E-mail [email protected] Article first published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com): 14 August 2014 DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.36713 Ó 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2901

Ocular pterygium-Digital keloid dysplasia

  • Upload
    raoul-c

  • View
    215

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

CLINICAL REPORT

Ocular Pterygium—Digital Keloid Dysplasia

Hugo Abarca,1y Anne E Christensen Mellgren,2,3y Milana Trubnykova,1 Olav H. Haugen,2,3

Gunnar Høvding,2,3 Kare Steinar Tveit,4 Gunnar Houge,3,5 Cecilie Bredrup,2,5

and Raoul C Hennekam6*1Instituto Nacional de Salud del Nino, Lima, Peru2Department of Ophthalmology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway4Department of Dermatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway5Center for Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway6Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children’s Hospital and Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center,

University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Manuscript Received: 3 March 2014; Manuscript Accepted: 3 July 2014

How to Cite this Article:Abarca H, Mellgren AEC, Trubnykova M,

Haugen OH, Høvding G, Tveit KS, Houge

G, Bredrup C, Hennekam RC. 2014. Ocular

pterygium—digital keloid dysplasia.

Am J Med Genet Part A 164A:2901–2907.

We describe an adolescent Peruvian male with marked, aggres-

sive ingrowth of conjunctiva (pterygium-like) over the cornea

associated with keloid formation on his distal limbs. He has in

addition camptodactyly of all fingers and to some extent of his

toes, and unusual skin pigmentations. He resembles an earlier

described family from Norway in which a mother and two

children showed a similar combination of signs. We present

the follow-up of the Norwegian family. The entity resembles the

Penttinen syndrome but can be differentiated due to the early

aging in the latter, which is lacking in the presently reported

entity. We suggest naming this entity ocular pterygium–digital

keloid dysplasia. The condition follows likely an autosomal

dominant pattern of inheritance. � 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Key words: keloid; childhood ocular pterygium; camptodactyly;

autosomal dominant

Conflict of interest: NoneyHugo Abarca and Anne E Christensen Mellgren have contributed

equally to the manuscript.

Grant sponsor: Western Norway Regional Health Authority; Grant

numbers: 911466, 911688.�Correspondence to:

Dr Raoul C Hennekam, Department of Pediatrics, Room 7-236, AMC,

Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam. E-mail [email protected]

Article first published online in Wiley Online Library

(wileyonlinelibrary.com): 14 August 2014

DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.36713

INTRODUCTION

Keloid formation can be defined as increased scar tissue formation

not being in accordance to the trauma.Keloidsmay impair function

by restriction of the skin and decrease of joint mobility, can be

aesthetically disfiguring, and may cause intense symptomatic dis-

tress due to the itching and pain, which often accompanies keloids.

Keloids do not occur frequently in syndromes and if they occur

together with other manifestations, they are located at upper

thorax, shoulders and upper arms, which are also the predilection

sites of isolated keloids.

In 1998 Haugen and Bertelsen [1998] reported on a mother and

two sons with ingrowth of conjunctival tissue that gradually

covered the whole cornea and progressive keloid formation in their

hands and fingers. A single family with possibly the same entity has

been reported since [Balaji et al., 1991; Booth andHodgkins, 2006].

Here we report on a patient from a second family with very similar

findings, and provide an update on the family reported by Haugen

2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

and Bertelsen. We suggest naming this entity ocular pterygium-

digital keloid dysplasia.

CLINICAL REPORT

The proband was the fifth child of nonconsanguineous Peruvian

parents. There are several persons in the familywithocular pterygia:

the parents of the proband are both construction workers. Father

developed pterygia from the age of 30 years and mother had minor

pterygia from the age of about 20 years. Neither has undergone

surgery.Mother has one brother who underwent successful surgery

for his pterygia. There are noother known eye diseases in the family,

and no one is known to have keloid formation.

Theproband is thefifth child of these parents. Their first children

were twins born at 8months weighing 2700 g. Both died in infancy,

2901

FIG. 1. Face of the proband. Note the narrow nasal bridge and

prominent nose.

2902 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A

one due to an infection, and the other of unknown reasons. Their

next son died in infancy because of an infection as well. Mother

subsequently gave birth to a healthy daughter who never developed

problems similar to the proband. All children were born by

caesarean section. Because of this obstetric history the pregnancy

of theprobandwas endedby caesarean at 34weeks. Birthweightwas

2500 g and lengthwas stated tohavebeennormal.He received “light

therapy” at home for 4 weeks because of prolonged hyperbiliru-

binaemia. His psychomotor development was normal; he could sit

at 6months, andwalk at 16months.His initial speech development

was somewhat slow (first words at 2 years) but subsequently his

cognitive development was completely normal.

Since childhood he complained of early fatigability, which

persisted into adulthood. Cardiac examination showed normal

cardiac anatomy and function. He was found to have ingrown

toenails which were surgically corrected, after which keloid forma-

tion started at his toes.Non-operated toes developedkeloids aswell,

which was possibly related to nail bed irritation, and he had also a

skin lesion on his right sole. The keloids increased with time, and

after a biopsy was taken rapid growth was noted. He had congenital

mildly decreasedmobility of his fingers, showing in only faint distal

flexion creases of all fingers, but initially no keloid formation at his

hands.Radiological studies failed to showbony abnormalities of the

hands. At 5 years reduced vision was first noticed. At 7 years, an

aggressive pterygium was diagnosed on the right eye, starting from

the nasal side and spreading over the cornea. A year later a similar

pterygium was noticed on the left eye. At 9 years, he underwent

pterygium excision in both eyes, in the left eye Mitomycin C was

applied, but the pterygia recurred. Repeated surgery on the right eye

was performed but without success. Subsequently, he developed a

right-sided symblepharon. At 18 years a keratoprosthesis was

implanted in the right eye, with initial success and regain of

some visual acuity, but subsequent loss of vision due to dislocation

of the keratoprosthesis to the interior of the eye. He has subse-

quently developed phthisis in the right eye, and has visual acuity of

light perception only. In the left eye visual acuity was 0.2 (Snellen)

despite recurrence of the pterygium. The temporal part of the

cornea of the left eye is still clear (Fig. 3).

The probanddeveloped around15 years of age darkly pigmented

skin lesions on trunk and limbs, which sometimes were confluent

but sometimes also disappeared. Clinically the skin changes resem-

bled brown angiokeratomas. At that time hammertoes developed,

especially of the right 2nd, 3rd, and 4th toe. The camptodactyly had

gradually increased and he developed two small keloids, both after

trauma, on a middle finger. At age 19 years he was diagnosed

with photosensitive dermatitis in his face needing treatment

(methotrexate).

On examination at age 19 years the proband was a normally

intelligent adolescent, height 167 cm(10th centile) andweight 60 kg

(30th centile), and head circumference 57.0 cm (50th centile). He

had normal hair, an irregularly formed right eyebrow and blephar-

ophimosis, interpreted to be secondary to the earlier surgery

(Fig. 1). There were tongues of conjunctival tissue invading the

cornea in both eyes, in the right eye covering the whole cornea

(Fig. 2), narrow nasal bridge, prominent nose, normal teeth,

somewhat high palate, and pits of the posterior helices. He had a

normal trunk with mildly increased fat deposits, a thoracic kypho-

sis, and normalmale genitalia. Therewasmild hyperhidrosis of face

and trunk.Mobility in shoulders and elbowswasnormal, andhands

showed camptodactyly of all fingers. There were small keloids on

the middle finger (Fig. 3a). There were only faint flexion creases

visible over the distal interphalangeal joints. Mobility in hips and

knees was normal. He had hammertoes, more marked on the right

side, shortened distal phalanges of the halluces, and bluish discol-

ored keloid tissue on the dorsum of both halluces with some

spreading to the dorsum of the feet (Fig. 3b).

UPDATE OF HAUGEN AND BERTELSEN REPORT

The family consists of an affected mother (proband) and two

affected sons. The parents of the proband had reportedly normal

eyes and no keloids. At 2 years ingrowth of scar tissue was observed

in both eyes of the proband. Despite surgery the ingrowth pro-

gressed and became confluent when she was 8 years of age. From

20 years on she developed keloid-like scars on the flexor side of the

fingers causing flexion contractures (Fig. 4a). In her sixties she quite

abruptly developed large granuloma-annulare-like eczemas on the

posterior aspect of both upper arms. In one of these lesions a

sarcoma developed that was successfully treated. The number of

cutaneous fibromas increased over the years, especially on the

central face, trunk, and extremities. At 73 years she developed an

adenocarcinoma of the endometrium, and she died at age 75 years.

The oldest son of the proband presented with progressive,

superficial grayish corneal opacities in the left eye at 1 year of

age and in the right eye at 2 years. At 3 years multiple tongue-like

ingrowths approached the center of the corneas (Fig. 4b). Surgical

interventions in the right eye were unsuccessful. In his second

decade he developed multiple broad-based fibromas on his trunk

and neck. At 21 years he developed keloids on his fingers but these

were less pronounced compared to those in hismother and brother.

At 35 years keloids developed on his halluces (Fig. 4a).

The youngest son of the probandhadnormal eyes until the age of

six when thin, grey-white tissue became apparent at the upper

temporal limbal region of the right eye. The changes progressed

slowly and at 18 years of age covered the whole cornea. The left eye

FIG. 2. Eyes of the proband at 19 year of age. Note phthisic right eye (axial length 16mm), extensive scarring due to conjunctival ingrowth

over the cornea and previous surgery. The symblepharon of the lower eyelid is secondary to surgery. The left eye (23mm) shows conjunctival

ingrowth nasally and superiorly; the temporal part is relatively spared.

FIG. 3. a. Right hand of the proband and detail of left middle finger. Note the camptodactyly and only faint distal interphalangeal flexion

creases. The left middle finger has two small keloids both as results of minor trauma. Fig. 3b. Feet of the proband. Note extensive keloid

formation. The keloids on both halluces appeared after surgery for ingrown nails. The keloids on the other toes apparently developed

spontaneously.

ABARCA ET AL. 2903

FIG. 4. a. Distal limbs of family reported by Haugen and Bertelsen [1998]. Left panel: Large keloids on the fingers of the proband (mother)

causing syndactyly and restricted movements of especially the index and middle finger, and extending from the back of the fingers to the

distal back of the hands. Middle panel: Keloids on the plantar side of the halluces of the eldest son. Right panel: Keloids on the right hand of

the youngest son, ending just proximal to the nail bed. Fig. 4b. Eyes of family members reported by Haugen and Bertelsen [1998]. Left panel:

The un-operated left eye of the eldest son, showing vascularized tissue covering the cornea completely. Right panel: The left eye of the

youngest son showing conjunctival ingrowth on the cornea resembling pterygium.

2904 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A

was unaffected until the age of 20, when similar changes appeared,

and in less than four years the optic axis was covered (Fig. 4b). At

15 years slowly progressive and bilaterally symmetric keloids de-

veloped on the third, fourth, and fifth fingers covering the dorsal

and lateral aspect of thedistal phalanges (Fig. 4a).At 28years keloids

arose on the plantar side of both halluces. In addition he developed

erythema in the face, and multiple fibromas in his face, neck,

shoulders, and back.

DISCUSSION

We report on a single individual who has aggressive, early ocular

pterygium-like formation with an unusual progression and lack of

response to treatment. In addition he has early onset keloid

formation on all distal limbs. These manifestations resemble the

manifestations described in the three members of a Norwegian

family to a great extent (Table I). The present proband showed

camptodactyly of hands and feet from early on. Marked campto-

dactyly of hands were seen in the proband of the Norwegian family,

but this was secondary to the extensive keloid formation on the

ventral side of her fingers. The present proband has an increased

thoracic kyphosis and truncal fat deposits, which were not evident

in the Norwegian family. As the major findings in the proband are

very similar to the findings in the family described by Haugen and

Bertelsen, it seems likely they have the same entity. We suggest

naming the entity ocular pterygium – digital keloid dysplasia, as

there are ocular pterygia, keloids on the digits, and the early onset,

the continuousprogressionduring life andhistological findingsfit a

dysplasia.

Booth and Hodgkins [2006] provided an update of a family

reported earlier on by Balaji and colleagues [1991]. In the first

report the family was reported to have Ebstein anomaly (displace-

ment of the septal and posterior tricuspid valve leaflets) and

restricted finger and toemovements [Balaji et al., 1991]. The update

described that one member had ingrowth of fibrous tissue in the

cornea on one side andmultiple keloids on trunk and limbs [Booth

and Hodgkins, 2006]. It was stated that by history several other

family members had multiple keloids as well. It remains uncertain

whether this family has ocular pterygium-digital dysplasia, due to

the presence of eye manifestations in only one of multiple affected

members, presence of keloids also on the trunk, and presence of

Ebstein anomaly.

A pterygium is a common fibrovascular dysplasia affecting the

bulbar conjunctiva, more frequently located on the nasal than

temporal limbus. In addition to discomfort it can give rise to visual

problems if it crosses the pupillary axis. In peri-equatorial countries

and in high altitude regions a high incidence of pterygia is seen.

Pterygia are assumed to be caused by high exposure to ultraviolet

light. Additional risk factors include family history, increasing age,

andmale gender. Certain groups, such as outdoor workers, have an

TABLE I. Main Characteristics in the Present Proband Compared to The Updated Findings Reported by Haugen and Bertelsen [1998]and to Penttinen Syndrome.

Proband

Haugen and Bertelsen, 1998 Penttinen syndromea

P1 (Mother) P2 (son) P3 (son) P1 P2 P3Cognition Nl Nl Nl Nl Nl Nl NlGrowth (centile) 167 cm

(P10)175 cm(P90)

170 cm(P15)

173 cm(P25)

P50–75 >3SD 3SD

Ocular pterygia bilat bilat bilat bilat � bilat bilatAge diagnosis 7yr 2yr 1yr 6yr 9yr 9yrProgression þþ þþ þþ þþ ? ?Age 1st surgery 9yr 4yr 3yr 23yr ? ?

Keloid (age) 4yr 20yr 22yr 15yr 2yr (3yr)Hands þ þþ þ þ þ þ �Feet þþ - þ þ þ þOther � right arm � � elbows, knees buttocks

Thin, translucent skin � � � � þ þ þAbnormal skin pigmentation þ � þ þ � � �Abnormal hair pigmentation � � � � þ ? ?Acro-osteolysis � � � � þ þ þShort, broad digits � � � � þ þ þCamptodactyly

Fingers þ þþ � � þþ þþ þþToes þ � � � � � �

FaceHair nl nl nl nl sparse sparse sparseNasal bridge narrow � � � broad � �(Pre)maxilla nl � � � retracted retracted retractedNose prominent � � � � � �Thin upper Vermilion � � � � þ þ þ

Hyperkyphosis þ � � � � þ þLipodystrophy (trunkal fat

deposits)� � � þ þ þ

Other � multiplefibromas

multiplefibromas

multiplefibromas

bifid uvulacorneal clouding

widefontanel

craniosynostosisEpilepsy VSD

aP1: Penttinen et al., 1997; P2 and P3: Zufferey et al., 2012.

ABARCA ET AL. 2905

increased incidence to develop pterygia [Liu et al., 2013]. The

prevalence of pterygium in Peru has been described as high as

31%. However, in less than 1% of the cases the pterygium extended

more than halfway to the center of the cornea and no patients below

20 years of age were described [Rojas and Malaga, 1986]. Since the

family of the proband has several risk factors for developing

pterygium (they live at a high altitude and are outdoor workers),

pterygium development is not unexpected in early adulthood,

which is the case in the affected familymembers except theproband.

In addition, the natural history in the other family members is as

expected for normal pterygiumdevelopment anddifferent from the

course in the proband. Therefore it is unlikely that pterygium

development in familymembers is causally related to the aggressive

conjunctival ingrowth seen in the proband. Pterygium formation in

children is rare and can in most cases be managed conservatively

[Monga et al., 2012].One family inwhich aggressive pterygiumwas

present in three second degree family members, of which two

developed ocular changes in childhood (at 6 and 4 years, respec-

tively) has been described. No extraocular signs or symptoms were

reported, in particular not with respect to the skin [Islam and

Wagoner, 2001].

Another main finding in the present patient is the keloid

formation at the distal limbs. There are only a limited number

ofMendelian entities that go along with keloid formation. Some of

the connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

type IV [Burk et al., 2007] and lateralmeningocele syndrome [Chen

et al., 2005] can show keloid formation. Goeminne syndrome is

characterized by a progressive torticollis, kyphosis, pectus forma-

tion, umbilical herniae, varicose veins, normal intelligence, and

keloids on trunk and limbs, including hands [Fryns and

Gevers, 2003], and this condition may in fact also be a connective

tissue disorder. One of us (RCH) has seen severalmales and females

2906 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A

with a phenotype that resembles frontometaphyseal dysplasia but

without detectable Filamin A mutations, who had numerous

rounded keloidswidely spreadover their body. Themost frequently

occurring syndrome that goes along with keloid formation in a

significant percentage of patients is Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome

[Hennekam, 2006]. A recent study showed that 24% of all Rubin-

stein-Taybi patients develop keloids [Van de Kar et al., in press].

Keloids in this entity are located on upper thorax, shoulders and

upper arms, and rarely elsewhere.Myhre syndrome is characterized

by intellectual disability, short stature with a stocky body build,

hearing loss, an unusual face, and keloids can occur in the upper

airways (nose; larynx) [McGowanet al., 2011]. Inoculo-ectodermal

syndrome macrocephaly, areas of aplasia cutis of the scalp, epi-

bulbar dermoids, and areas of hyperpigmentation of the skin can go

along with keloid formation as well [Evers et al., 1994]. Several

families have been described with a phenotype that resembles

Bardet-Biedl syndrome without the distal limb anomalies but

with deafness, cataract, and keloid formation as additional man-

ifestations [Boor et al., 1993]. Heyen and co-workers reported on

several individuals from a single family who had a large optic cup-

to-disc ratio, camptodactyly and keloid formation on trunk or

proximal limbs [Heyen et al., 2008]. Finally, keloid formation has

rarely been described in chromosome imbalances such as Turner

syndrome and deletions of the terminal part of chromosome 19p

[Archer et al., 2005], and in a small number of case reports [Leung

et al., 1988;Coffin, 1990;Anandan et al., 2008]. In noneof the above

entities progressive conjunctival ingrowth on the cornea was seen,

and only very infrequently keloids develop on their hands and feet.

There is a single entity in which ocular pterygia have been reported

together with keloids on the distal limbs, i.e. Penttinen syndrome

[Penttinen et al., 1997; Zufferey et al., 2012]. The three patients

reportedwith this entitymayhaveocular pterygia that arise at a very

young age as in ocular pterygium-digital keloid dysplasia, and may

also have keloid formation on the back of the hands and feet

(Table I). However, in Penttinen syndrome the affected individuals

may show somatic overgrowth, facial characteristics (sparse hair,

retracted maxilla and pre-maxilla, and thin upper vermillion), an

unusual thin and translucent skin, progressive acro-osteolysis,

progressive lipodystrophy, and short and broad digits, especially

thumbs and halluces. We concur with Zufferey and co-workers

[2013] that despite the resemblances the differences are sufficient to

discern the two entities.

We conclude that the present patient resembles the family

reported by Haugen and Bertelsen [1998] but not any other entity,

The occurrence of the syndrome in twogenerations, both sexes, and

absence of consanguinity all point to an autosomal dominant

pattern of inheritance. The cause is unknown. We have initiated

a molecular study using next generation sequencing techniques in

order to detect the gene causing this entity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the family for their participation in this study. We thank

Eyvind Rødahl for useful discussions and Marte Emilie Sandvik

Haaland and Lisbet Sviland for professional assistance. This study

was supported by grants from theWesternNorwayRegionalHealth

Authority (911466 and 911688 to C.B). None of the authors have

any conflicts of interests.

REFERENCES

Anandan V, Parveen B, Prabhavathy D, Priyavarthini V. 2008. AdamsOliver syndrome—A variant. Int J Dermatol 47:1260–1262.

ArcherHL,Gupta S, Enoch S, ThompsonP,RowbottomA,Chua I,WarrenS, Johnson D, Ledbetter DH, Lese-Martin C, Williams P, Pilz DT. 2005.Distinct phenotype associated with a cryptic subtelomeric deletion of19p13.3-pter. Am J Med Genet 136A:38–44.

Balaji S,DennisNR,KeetonBR. 1991. Familial Ebstein anomaly:A reportofsix cases in two generations associated with mild skeletal abnormalities.Br Heart J 66:26–28.

BoorR,Herwig J, Schrezenmeir J, Pontz BF, SchonbergerW. 1993. Familialinsulin resistant diabetes associated with acanthosis nigricans, polycysticovaries, hypogonadism, pigmentary retinopathy, labyrinthine deafness,and mental retardation. Am J Med Genet 45:649–653.

Booth AJ, Hodgkins PR. 2006. Pseudopterygium arising in a patient withmultiple keloids. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabis 43:49–51.

Burk CJ, Aber C, Connelly EA. 2007. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV:Keloidal plaques of the lower extremities, amniotic bands, limbdeformities, and a new mutation. J Am Acad Dermatol 56 (Suppl 2):S53–S54.

ChenKM, Bird L, Barnes P, Barth R,Hudgins L. 2005. Lateral meningocelesyndrome: Vertical transmission and expansion of the phenotype. Am JMed Genet 133A:115–121.

Coffin GS. 1990. Developmental retardation with unusual facies, arthritis,and hearing impairment. Dysmorph Clin Genet 4:103–109.

CoroneoMT, Chui JJY. 2013. Pterygium In: Holland EJ,MannisMJ, BarryLee W, Ocular surface disease:Cornea, conjuntiva and tear film. Phila-delphia: Elsevier Sauders. p. 125–144.

EversMEJW, Dijkman-Neerincx RHM,Hamel BCJ. 1994. Oculo-ectoder-mal syndrome: A new case. Am J Med Genet 53:378–379.

Fryns JP, Gevers D. 2003. Goeminne syndrome (OMIM 314300): Anothermale patient 30 years later. Genet Counsel 14:109–111.

Haugen OH, Bertelsen T. 1998. A new hereditary conjunctivo-cornealdystrophy associated with dermal keloid formation. Acta OphthalmolScand 76:461–465.

Hennekam RCM. 2006. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet14:981–985.

Heyen CA, Delk PR, Bull MJ, Weaver DD. 2008. A report of an apparentnew genetic syndrome consisting of joint contractures, keloids, largeoptic cup-to-disc ratio and renal stones. Am J Med Genet 146A:3120–3125.

Islam SI, WagonerMD. 2001. Pterygium in youngmembers of one family.Cornea 20:708–710.

Leung RSC, BeerWE, Mehta HK. 1988. Aplasia cutis congenita presentingas a familial triad of atrophic alopecia, ocular defects and a peculiarscarring tendency of the skin. Br J Dermatol 118:715–720.

Liu L, Wu J, Geng J, Yuan Z, Huang D. 2013. Geographical prevalence andrisk factors for pterygium: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJOpen 3:e003787.

McGowan R, Gulati R, McHenry P, Cooke A, Butler S, KengWT, MurdayV,WhitefordM,Dikkers FG, Sikkema-Raddatz B, van Essen T, Tolmie J.2011. Clinical features and respiratory complications in myhre syn-drome. Eur J Med Genet 54:553–559.

ABARCA ET AL. 2907

Monga S, Gupta A, Kekunnava R, Goyal S, Vemuganti GK, Sachdeva V.2012. Childhood pterygium; a descriptive study of 19 cases presented to atertiary eye care center. Am J Ophthalmol 154:859–864.

Penttinen M, Niemi KM, Vinkka-Puhakka H, Johansson R, Aula P. 1997.New progeroid disorder. Am J Med Genet 69:182–187.

Rojas JR, Malaga H. 1986. Pterygium in Lima, Peru. Ann Ophthalmol18:147–149.

Van de Kar A, Houge G, ShawAC, Van BelzenMJ, Peters DJM,HennekamRC. Keloids in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: A clinical study. Br JDermatol. In press.

Zufferey F, Hadj-Rabia S, De Sandre-Giovannoli A, Dufier JL, Leheup B,Schweitze C, Bodemer C, Cormier-Daire V, Le Merrer M. 2012. Acro-octeolysis, keloid like-lesions, distinctive facial features, and overgrowth:Two newly recognized patients with premature aging syndrome, pentti-nen type. Am J Med Genet 161A:1786–1791.