Upload
others
View
12
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CREATE Project
1/34
OrganizationalOrganizational CreativityCreativity
CREATE Project
2/34
AgendaIndividual and Organizational Creativity
Dichotomies and organizationalcoexistence within creativity
Proposed methodology and application
CREATE Project
3/34
Individual and Organizational Creativity
Dichotomies and organizationalcoexistence within creativity
Proposed methodology and application
Agenda
CREATE Project
4/34
INDIVIDUAL CREATIVE ACTION IN MULTIPLESOCIAL DOMAINS
• I wonder if the rest of my team will find this interesting?
DOMAIN: a group (workunit members)
• Will the company allocate funds for a research project?
DOMAIN: organisation (socialised organisatonal actors)
CREATE Project
5/34
INDIVIDUAL CREATIVE ACTION IN MULTIPLE SOCIAL DOMAINS
• Is this product conform to federal safty requirements?
DOMAIN: institutions (professional specialist)
DOMAIN: markets (consumers, suppliers, competitors…)
• Will it sell?
CREATE Project
6/34
LONG-DURATION CREATIVE PROJECT
• Development of the Boeing 777 aircraft
• It took 5 years to complete and it was priced at $100 million
• Over four million discrete components
• 250 separate, yet highly interdependent design teams
CREATE Project
7/34
CREATIVITY“…is the evolutive aptitude of a system”
Binnig, 1991
Aptitude: capability of modifying, changing, innovating
System: subjects of creativity are not only individuals, but alsosocial systems, organizations and enterprises
Evolution: it is impossible to foresee the behaviour of creative systems, just considering their inputs
CREATE Project
8/34
INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITY
“Creativity is the capability to think out of scheme, achieving new and functional conclusions, suited to
solve a problem or catch an opportunity”
Bertone, 1993
CREATE Project
9/34
DEFINITIONS
• Creativity is a domain-specific, subjectivejudgement of the novelty and value of anoutcome of an particular actor
• Creativity is a production of novel ideasthat are useful and appropriate to thesituation
CREATE Project
10/34
DEFINITIONS• Creativity is the process of engagement in
creative acts, regardlles of whether the results are novel and useful
• Creativity is a process of sensing problems, making guesses, formulating hypothesis, communicating ideas to others and contradicting conformity
CREATE Project
11/34
AN INTERACTIONIST MODEL OF ORGANISATIONAL CREATIVITY
Individual
creativityGroup
creativity
Organisation
creativity
External
environment
Antecedent condition CI contextual influences
CI
CICI
(Woodman et al., 1993, AMR)
CREATE Project
12/34
INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITY
Ci = f(A, B, CS, P, K, IM, SI, CI)
A.. antecedent conditionsB.. creative behaviourCS.. cognitive styleP.. personalityK.. knowledgeIM.. intrinsic motivationSI.. social influencesCI.. contextual influences
CREATE Project
13/34
CREATIVITY IN GROUPS
CG=f(Ci, GCOMP, GCHAR, GPROC, CI)
GCOMP.. group composition
GCHAR.. group characteristics
GPROC.. group processes
CREATE Project
14/34
CREATIVITY IN ORGANISATIONS
Co=f(CG, CI)
Encourage risk takingStimulate participationIntrinsic rather than extrinsic rewardsStimulate sharing informationsSlack resourcesOrganisational designAbsorptive capacity
CREATE Project
15/34
The Time-Pressure/Creativity MatrixTime Pressure
Likelihood
Of Creative
Thinking
High
Low
Low High
Creative thinking under low timepressure:
• to feel as on expedition,
• generating or exploring newideas,
• to collaborate with one person.Creative thinking under lowtime pressure is unlikely:
• little encouragement frommanagement
• a lot of group meetings rather
then with individuals
• to feel like on the mission,
• to focuse on one activity,
• doing important job, beingpositively challenged
• equal orientation on exploringideas and identifying problems
• distraction
•highly fragmented work
• don’t get a sense the work is important
• experience lots of last-minute
changes
CREATE Project
16/34
ORGANIZATIONAL CREATIVITY (1/2)
• It is not determined by the single individual creativities• It is not the sum of individual creativities• It is the context, that exalts synergies
“…is the result of the conditionsthe whole organization is in”
Vicari, 1998
CREATE Project
17/34
Fonte: Vicari, 1998
Types of creativity
ORGANIZATIONAL CREATIVITY (2/2)
Individual CreativityHIGHLOW
Org
aniz
atio
nal C
reat
ivity
LOW
HIG
H• Organizations based
on continuousimprovement, on effectivenesssystematic seeking
• Low rate of innovation, only imitations
• Not so much effectiveorganizations
• Successfulorganizations
• High rate of innovation
• Few innovations, sometimes radical, based on individualentrepreneurial spirit
CREATE Project
18/34
Creativity
CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION
Creativity as the milieu where innovative processes mightflourish easily
Innovation is the outcome, creativity is the condition
Innovativeprocesses
Innovation
CREATE Project
19/34
A METAPHOR
CREATIVE TECHNIQUES seeding
ORGANIZATIONAL CREATIVITY rich soil
How do you “enrich” an organizationto make it creative?
CREATE Project
20/34
Individual and Organizational Creativity
Dichotomies and organizationalcoexistence within creativity
Proposed methodology and application
Agenda
CREATE Project
21/34
CREATIVE VS HABITUAL BEHAVIOUR
The returns on creative actions are systematically less certain, more remote in time and more distant from the locus ofaction than are more routine actions(March, OS, 1991)
CREATE Project
22/34
FROM DICHOTOMIES TO COEXISTENCE
R.N. Foster, S. Kaplan, 2001
ORGANIZATIONAL CREATIVITY
ORDERORDER CHAOSCHAOS
coexistence
“Enterprises need to be re-imagined in order to strenghten their capability to evolve, instead of their capability to perform”
A company cannot function as an anarchy. It must be organised, it must beroutinised, it must be planned…Oganisations by the nature are inhospitableenvironments for innovations. T. Levitt, 2002
CREATE Project
23/34
ORGANIZATIONAL DICHOTOMIES
Continuity
Perform
Convergence
Control
Discontinuity
Create
Divergence
Freedom of action
OR
OR
OR
OR
From OR culture to AND culture
CREATE Project
24/34
DICHOTOMIES and COEXISTENCE (1/4)
(routine, past success, survival spirit, …)
(radical innovation, turbolentenvironments, real markets, …)
Risks and Resourcesminimization, cultural hinders, low innovation capability, possible strategicerrors
Uncertainty, lack of modelsto follow, possibility of new
competitive advantages
continuitycontinuity discontinuitydiscontinuity
Organize the presentaccording to future scenarios
CREATE Project
25/34
DICHOTOMIES and COEXISTENCE (2/4)performperform createcreate
(use of past operational models, exploitation of acquired skills, …)
(future imagination, realitytransformation, unbeaten
paths exploration, …)
Effectiveness, consolidation, processes’ full control
Priority of action, instead of analysis (try&learn)
Learning by exploitationAnd learning by exploration
CREATE Project
26/34
DICHOTOMIES and COEXISTENCE (3/4)convergenceconvergence divergencedivergence
( deduction, model building, analytic thinking, …)
(change your point of view, unusual associations, cross
fertilization, absorptive capacity…) Measurable, suited to well
defined and rationalproblems
Output high casuality, original visions
R.N. Foster, S. Kaplan, 2001
Collision Decision
Sperimentation
Divergent
IncubationConvergent
Observation
CREATIVE ACTION
CREATE Project
27/34
DICHOTOMIES and COEXISTENCE (4/4)controlcontrol freedomfreedom of of
actionaction(respect of routines and procedures, …)
(possibility to take risks, makemistakes, …)
No excessive risk taking, blocks to radical innovation
Responsibleness, lack of coordination
Give guide-lines,avoid to assign rigid tasks
CREATE Project
28/34
Individual and Organizational Creativity
Dichotomies and organizationalcoexistence within creativity
Proposed methodology and application
CREATE Project
29/34
AN OPERATIVE APPROACH
How can we translate in practical terms all the abovementioned concepts?
Does it exist an universal recipe to enhance organizationalcreativity?
Is it possible to approach the topic with a structuredmethodology?
CREATE Project
30/34
It was born from a comparative analysisof methodologies and techniques
one methodologyarticulated in 5 phases
6 selected techniques
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY: “BEST OF BREED”
16 analyzed methodologies
More than 100 assessedtechniques
CREATE Project
31/34
METHODOLOGICAL PHASES
1- External Mapping
2- Internal Mapping
3- Creative Process
4- Evaluation
individuation of new or unexpressedneeds, study of competitors’strategies…
Valorization of organizational resourcesto enhance the emergence of new business concepts; internal survey
Ideas production
Evaluation and selection of best ideasaccording to the assessment criteriaestablished internally by the company
0- PredispositionCreation of conditions enablingcreativity development, definition of business targets, resources allocation, training about the use of techniques and team building
CREATE Project
32/34
TOOLS3
Creative process
4Evaluation
CreativityTemplate
MorphologicalAnalysis
Provocation& Movement
Six Hats
1ExternalMapping
2InternalMapping
AttributesValue chain
SWOTAnalysis
EDUCATION QUESTIONARY SESSION GROUP SESSION
0Predisposition
tech
niqu
esph
ases
Creativetraining
CREATE Project
33/34
APPLICATION: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTConceptualization
Product planning
Product design
Product engineering
Process engineering
Industrialization
Pre-set / Start
Production
Organizational Creativity for new product’s concept
Suppliers Purchasing TradeMarketing
Clients
Design
Production
CREATE Project
34/34
CONTACTS:
Alberto F. De Toni: [email protected]
Krsto Pandža: [email protected]