13
1 RICH efficiency versus p/p th - merging low and high field settings Incorporating different inefficiency components => RichInefficiencyModule Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

RICH efficiency versus p/p th - merging low and high field settings Incorporating different inefficiency components => RichInefficiencyModule. Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University. At high fields inefficiencies for A and B polarities are different. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

1

RICH efficiency versus p/pth

- merging low and high field settings

Incorporating different inefficiency components =>

RichInefficiencyModule

Paweł Staszel

Jagiellonian University

Page 2: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

2

At high fields inefficiencies for A and B polarities are different

It is due to different pion+kaon and proton contributions

Page 3: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

3

Extracting pions+kaon and protoninefficiency

(1)

All coefficients are known, so,this set of equations can be solved in respect to f

π and f

p

for each momentum bin

Page 4: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

4

Results for 2A3450 + 2B3450

Cut on x-slope makes the inefficienciesfree from “geometrical” effect allowing to extract pure “gamma factor”inefficiency

Page 5: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

5

Results for all possible settings

Rich vs Tof2

X-slope>0.01 => pure “gamma factor” effect

Page 6: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

6

Fitting low and high part of p/pth

Usual inefficiency formula Ordinary exponent with build-in matching to low p/p

th

Page 7: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

7

Zoom in at low p/pth

Page 8: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

8

Zoom in at high p/pth

Page 9: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

9

Strategy for RichEfficiencyModule We have to deal with 3 effects:

1. “gamma factor” effect Eγ

2. “x-slope (geometrical)” effect Eg

3. two track resolution effect Er

It is fair to assume that these effects are independent, if so,the total efficiency is a product of individual efficiencies:

For small inefficiencies:

But in general:

See attached note on two track resolution

Page 10: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

10

Problem: not all fsTrack are reconstructed

Using condition #T5tracks = 1 versus no condition on #T5Tracks give small effect because usually #fsTracks = #T5Tracks,

Events with #T5Tracks > 1 (#T5Tracks=2) looks similar to events with #fsTracks==2.

Page 11: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

11

Same effect at high fields (2 deg)

Page 12: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

12

Same effect at high fields (4 deg)

Possible strategies: 1) add x/y - slope info for each T5 track and redo dsts2) apply an average efficiency related to two track resolution determinedfrom events with #fsTracks=2.

Page 13: Paweł Staszel Jagiellonian University

13

How to use RichEfficiencyCalculator

The calculator is in banapp/corrections/efficiency

RichEfficiencyCalculator* richEffCal=new RichEfficiencyCalculator(“run04”,”auau”,”200”);richEffCal->Init();

in event loop:

richEffCal->CalculateEffectiveEfficiencies(multi,d12,d13,d23);(see attached note)

if track loop:Float_t InEff = richEffCal->GetInEffic(i,t5ax,p/pth);orFloat_t Eff = richEffCal->GetEffic(i,t5ax,p/pth);