Upload
lymien
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Researched. Tested. Guaranteed.
Headsprout® Early Reading
Janet S. Twyman, Ph.D., BACB VP of Instructional Development, Research & Implementation
PaTTAN Pennsylvania Dept. of Education
Collaborative Project to Assess the Effects of
Headsprout Early Reading with ASD Learners
Goal: Pilot Headsprout Early Reading in the 25
CLM Year 3 classrooms, to determine effects on
oral reading rates across participants.
Partnering with Educators
Our Mission
Headsprout’s mission is to be a major force in
helping to eliminate illiteracy.
1 – 23
“Cracking the Code”
Constructing a Repertoire
24 – 40
“Reading Makes Sense”
57-80
“Reading for Meaning and Enjoyment”
41-56
“Accelerate and
Diversify”
Across the 80 Episodes:
An Enduring Legacy: Things We’ve Learned about Instruction
• The learner is always right.
• The program should be based on an intersection of research in the subject matter and research from our basic and instructional sciences.
• The program should focus on building a repertoire (not a series of unrelated skills).
• It should contain a high degree of interactivity, recognizing the active role of the learner.
• The program should have a balance between direct instruction and “discovery.”
• Instruction should immediately adapt to learner’s behavior.
• All facets of instruction should undergo rigorous “formative” analysis and modification.
• The program should withstand outside scrutiny, replication, and “summative” evaluation.
…and so many others
Thank you to…
Determine Mutual Interest
Assess Technology Infrastructure
Determine Protocols
Provide Program Orientation/Virtual
Training
Pre-Test Participants
Use Headsprout
Post-Test Participants
Pilot Study Parameters
Technology Requirements
Use an Internet-connected computer, headphones, mouse Computer access during the semi-directed parts of the daily routine
Conduct system test http//www.headsprout.com/detect/sysanalysis
Determine a Schedule Two 15 minutes sessions daily
Study Protocol
Research Consent
Pre Test 3 DIBELS 1-minute Timings
Program Use High Fidelity of Implementation
Post Test 3 DIBELS 1-minute Timings
Survey
Orientation / Virtual Training
Conducted October 2008 PATTAN Harrisburg site;
broadcast across state, available online
Program Overview
Online Episodes
Sprout Stories/Recording Story Data Performance Reports
Modifications for ASD Learners
Study Protocol
Ongoing Assistance
Determine who will… oversee the online
lessons listen to and record story
readings enter benchmarks review data and make
instructional decisions
Determine which students 5 per class CLM semi-directed
Teachers were instructed to:
Typical Readiness Skills…
Thelearnercan:
sitatacomputerfor5‐10minutes
followsimplecommoninstruc5ons
acceptfeedback(praiseorcorrec5on)andcon5nuewithtasks
repeataspokenwordorphrase
requesta=en5on/assistance
Complete“MousingAround”
Adapting for Special Needs Working with ASD Learners
Session Duration
Additional Practice
External Assistance
Transfer to Print
Sensory Sensitivity
Accepting Feedback
Non or Limited Vocal Verbal Repertoire
Three Guiding Principles
1. Complete several episodes a week
2. Speak out loud when this icon is on the screen
3. Read all 80 Sprout Stories while progressing through the program
Sprout Stories Mini-Books
Provided by PATTAN
80 “Leveled” Stories
Provided at specific episodes
Read by learner, to adult or other active listener
12 require oral reading assessment (accuracy); Ensure transfer from screen to print & make instructional decisions
Performance Reports
Online Access
Types of Reports
Data-based Instructional Decisions
Who Sees the Headsprout Data
“Instructional Help Line” (email and telephone)
Available at http://dibels.uoregon.edu/
Widely used
Repeatedly calibrated
Easily accessible
Easy to use
Free
Three 1-minute timings: Progress Monitoring Story 1: The Ant Hill Progress Monitoring Story 10: The Train Trip Progress Monitoring Story 20: My Soccer Team
Outcome Evaluation: Pre- and Post-Tests
DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency (ORF)
individually administered test of accuracy and fluency with connected text
identifies children who may need additional instructional support
monitors progress toward instructional goals.
standardized set of passages…calibrated for the goal level of reading for each grade level
student read a passage aloud for one minute to obtain the number of correct words per minute
https://dibels.uoregon.edu/measures/orf.php
48 teachers enrolled learners
140 learners enrolled 12 learners did not access the program; 5 learners did not complete the first episode
Participant pool: 123 learners
ASD learners enrolled in PATTAN programs
96 Male, 27 Female
Across ages, grades
Participants (Program Use Nov ‘08-May ’09)
Target: 80 Episodes
13 learners completed all 80 episodes
Average: 34 episodes
Median: 30 episodes (range 1-80)
Headsprout Data: Episode Completion
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76
Nu
mb
er
of
Learn
ers
Episode Number
Placement of Learners in Program
Headsprout Data: Duration & Percent Correct
123
Learners Total
Duration Percent
Correct
Average 11 hours 87%
Median 10.5 hours 89%
Range (low) 30 mins.* 50%
Range (high) 30 hours 98%
* 1 episode
Benchmarks # (%) of Teachers
Noopportunity (not enough episodes completed) 4 (8%)
Didnotenter any 15 (31%) Entered at least 1 29 (60%)
Enteredat least half 26 (54%)
Entered all 10 (21%)
Headsprout Data: Benchmark Reading Assmt.
Average % Correct # Classes
90-99% 18 80-89% 3 70-79% 3 60-69% 2 50-59% 2 40-49% 1*
Below 40% 0
Headsprout Data: Benchmark Reading Assmt.
*1 learner
140 learners enrolled
123 learners completed at least 1 episode
86 learners had data for all 3 pretest timings
62 learners had data for all 3 posttest timings
52 learners had data for both pre & posttests
12 learners has all 0’s for all pre & posttests (non-vocal?)
DIBELS Data: Oral Reading Fluency
52 learners (program use; median pre/post) 12 learners had “zero medians” pre/post N = 40; Average change: 13 wpm gain
37 learners showed ORF gains Average: 14 wpmc gain
Median: 7 wpmc gain
Range: 1 – 62 wpmc gain
2 learners showed no change
1 learner showed ORF loss (-3 wpmc)
DIBELS: ORF Median Score - All Users
48 learners completed e40 and above 23 learners had pre/post scores 1 learner had “zero medians” pre/post N = 22; Average change: 19 wpm gain
20 learners showed ORF gains
Average: 21 wpmc gain
Median: 18 wpmc gain
Range: 3 – 62 wpmc gain
1 learner showed no change
DIBELS: ORF Median Score – Half Program
48 learners completed e80 (entire program) 6 learners had pre/post scores 1 learner had “zero medians” pre/post N = 5
All 5 learners showed ORF gains
Average: 24 wpmc gain
Median: 21 wpmc gain
Range: 7 – 41 wpmc gain
DIBELS: ORF Median Score–All 80 Episodes
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
OR
F W
PM
C
Highest Episode Completed
Correlation: Episode Completion and ORF
Pre Test Post Test
All Scores n=87, 62
At Risk: 73 (39) Some Risk: 10
Low Risk: 4
At Risk: 43 (13) Some Risk: 8 Low Risk: 10
Both Pre/Post n=51
At Risk: 40 (20) Some Risk: 8 Low Risk: 3
At Risk: 36 (12) Some Risk: 5 Low Risk: 10
Half Program n=15
At Risk: 9 (3) Some Risk: 4 Low Risk: 2
At Risk: 6 (1) Some Risk: 3 Low Risk: 6
Full Program n=6
At Risk: 2 (1) Some Risk: 0 Low Risk: 4
At Risk: 1 (1) Some Risk: 1 Low Risk: 4
DIBELS Data: Oral Reading Fluency Risk Status
(# learners with median = 0)
Better identification of learners who might benefit; oral language ability
Understanding of barriers to implementation
More “Hands On” initial training (required participation)
Assessment/Assurance of program knowledge
Ongoing implementation feedback/active support
Lessons Learned