20
Performing Governance Assessments Myrk Harkins CIA, CBM

Performing Governance Assessments Myrk Harkins CIA, CBM

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Performing Governance Assessments

Myrk Harkins CIA, CBM

2

Agenda

Who Is Myrk Harkins? A little about the Southern Company Risk Based Auditing Governance Model

3

Myrk Harkins

Director of Internal Auditing West Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering Certified Internal Auditor & Certified Business

Manager 33 Years Experience with Southern Company

Power Plant Construction Plant Operations and Maintenance 10 Years Internal Auditing

4

The Southern Company

4.3 Million Customers Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Mississippi

Power, Gulf Power, Southern Power & Southern Link

42,000 MW of Generation (1 MW = 600 Homes) Revenue of $14.3 Billion Net Income of $1.6 Billion

5

Southern Company Internal Auditing

We are a Risked Based Audit

Organization

6

Sample CompanyEnterprise Risk Management

Qualitative estimate of the potential risk’s

impact on the specific function/entity

RED…focused management attention is required

GREEN…current management action is sufficient

YELLOW…on-going active monitoring by management is required

Risk Placement Guidelines:

Place risk here if…:$$$

Materiality of Impact

Scope of ControlLikelihood

Current L

evel of R

esidual Risk

$

7

2007 Sample Company Risk profile

Materialityof impact

Risk Accountability

1. Environmental legislation or regulation Evans/Johnson

2. Exposure to fuel prices/availability Johnson

3. Loss of constructive state regulatory environment

Operating Company CEOs

4. Nuclear Brown

5. Catastrophic business interruption Management Council

6. Change in federal regulatory or legislative policy Smith/Evans

7. Execution of the financial plan Farmer

8. Workforce issues Management Council

9. Deterioration of corporate image Management Council

10 Governance failure Ratcliffe/Farmer

11 Strategy selection and implementation

Ratcliffe/Management Council

9

8

Loss of constructive state regulatory environmentNuclear

Change in federal regulatory or legislative policy

Governance failure

Workforce issues

Execution of the financial plan

4

3

116

Likelihood$

$$$

1

2

5

10

Exposure to fuel price/availability

Catastrophic business interruption

Environmental legislation or regulation

7

Strategy selection and implementation

Deterioration of corporate image

8

2007 Sample Company Fraud risk profile

Materialityof impact

Fraud Risk Accountability

1. Inappropriate Capitalization of Expenses Evans/Taylor

2. Improper Use of Estimates and Judgments Ballard

3. False Compliance Reporting (EPA, OSHA, FERC, etc.) Operating Co CEOs

4. Political (Bribery of Public Officials, Illegal Contributions) Beasley

5. Vendor Fraud (Bid Rigging, Kickbacks, etc.) Management Council

6.

Competitive Practices (Unfair Competition - Antitrust, Violation of Territorial Service Agreements, Wholesale Competition)

Smith/Evans

7. Intentional Mistreatment of Affiliate Transactions Farmer

8. Inappropriate Executive Compensation Management Council

9. Employee Fraud / Misappropriation of Assets Management Council

9

8

False Compliance Reporting (EPA, OSHA, FERC, etc.Political (Bribery

of Public Officials, Illegal Contributions)

Competitive Practices (Unfair Competition – Antitrust, Violation of Territorial Service Agreements, Wholesale Competition)

Inappropriate Executive Compensation

Intentional Mistreatment of Affiliate Transactions

4

3

6

Likelihood$

1

2

5

Improper Use of Estimates and Judgments

Vendor Fraud (Bid Rigging, Kickbacks, etc.

Inappropriate Capitalization of Expenses

7

Strategy selection and implementation

Employee Fraud/Misappropriation of Assets

9

Audit Planning Process

Fraud Risks Annual Residual

Risk AssessmentExecutive Input

IA Staff Input

SOCO Risk Profile

Annual Audit Plan

Audit

Audit

Audit

Engagement Risk

Assessment

Engagement Risk

Assessment

Engagement Risk

Assessment

10

COSO Southern Company’s Control Framework

11

What is Governance

Governance is composed of the key business processes utilized by representatives of an organizations stakeholders (e.g. Shareholders (BOD), management, etc.) to optimize value by providing reasonable assurance that an entity achieves it business objectives.

SOCO ERM Program broadly defines governance as those business processes, internal controls, decision tools, oversight structures and corporate culture elements (Southern Style) that reasonably ensure achievement of the Company’s goals and objectives.

(ERM at SOCO = Our Methodology for Managing the Business)

Understanding Governance

12

A Simplified Approach to Governance(Company, Functional Activity, Business Unit, etc.)

Everything Starts with Business Objectives

Identify and Evaluate Significant Risks (Anything that could prevent achievement of business objectives)

Business Processes (Internal Controls & Governance Processes) to Reasonably Ensure Achievement of Business Objectives

Assurance (Monitoring Level of Achievement and Reporting)

13

Tone at the Top

Business Objectives

Business ProcessesAssurance

Info

rmatio

nC

om

mu

nicatio

n

InformationCommunication

Info

rmat

ion

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

Risk Assesment Information

Communication

A Simplified Approach to Governance

14

Mission, Purpose Strategic Direction & Business PlanGoals

StrategicOperationalReportingCompliance

Objective Setting “What are you trying to accomplish”

Microsoft Word Document

15

Internal Environment “Tone at the Top”

Risk AppetiteManagement CommitmentEthicsCompetenceResponsibilities and Accountability

Microsoft Word Document

16

Risk Assessment Process “What is going to keep you from your goals”

IdentificationAssessmentResponse

Microsoft Word Document

17

Business Processes

Control ActivitiesCompany PoliciesProcedures / Guidelines Internal Controls

Information and CommunicationAppropriateAvailabilityAccurate / CompleteTimely

Microsoft Word Document

18

Assurance“Monitoring”

Ongoing Activities Supervision Performance Measurement & Reporting

Assessment Processes Self Corp. Oversight (Internal Auditing) Independent

Reporting Deficiencies Follow Up & Corrective Actions

Microsoft Word Document

19

Practical Application

• Any Audit or Consulting Project

Microsoft Word Document

Questions & CommentsMyrk Harkins ([email protected])Phone – (205-257-2135)