8/6/2019 Phenomenons 2

1/2

-ismi ALLAH 'i Rahman-i Rahim...akan OKhenomenons2utlak Dzenden Isnarak ve Yrngelerde Hareket Ederek Tekaml Eden Evren ve nsan Hipotezinin Makalesi.

DF3.04.2011, Cumartesi 13:00akale: Phenomenons2azan : Hakan OK

Phenomenons 2he Truth;

23.04.2011 13:08)is a well known common sense and by some people ultimately known FACT (but officially kept under raps)at, today we all are aware of the truth about the universe and how it DID NOT and COULD NOT HAVE happen. I

ust don't understand, why this so called scientific thinking people (scientists), particularly Astrophysicists,heoretical Physicists and Quantum Physicists (at least the ones alive today), still persist on an outdated model, ample theory, an assumed hypothesis like Big Bang. For the common public and majority of some scientistsmaybe unaware of all the complicated details that leave and lead to a trail or believed truth in theironsciousness) the model indeed seems to be at first glance the best explanation of how the universe becameeing. But at the second glance, one may not be that much convinced about all the assumptions that had to beade (even fabricated) to make it (the model) what it is and how it is supposed to work today. All those

ssumptions that make the model/theory relevant to the public ARE NOT facts, nevertheless it is being threateneds kind of a (sometimes ultimate) truth by this public.

evelations, Hoax or Truth?ave you ever thought of the possibility that revelations might be truth or even just considered for a moment thatey may eventually be information for a possible (eventually) ultimate knowledge?am surprised of the behavior of science, not considering revelations as a possible source of knowledge , whichey should at least try to falsify*. Although there's another possibility of revelations to be disinformation, but this

as to be falsified like any other theory*. That is indeed not a very objective approach of science to informationat may eventually be ultimate knowledge. If there is even a little chance that it might be truth, why not using it?

or example:either the Jews nor the Nazarenes will be pleased with you until you follow their creed. Say, "The guidance isod's guidance." If you follow their wishes after the knowledge has come to you, then none can help or protectou against God. [2:120]

id those who reject not see that the heavens and the earth were one mass and We tore them apart? That Wemade from the water everything that lives. Will they not acknowledge? [21:30]

When Our signs are recited to them, they say, "We have listened, and if we wish, we could have said the samehing. This is nothing but tales of the ancients!" [8:31]

he one who says to his parents: "Enough of you! Are you promising me that I will be resurrected, when theenerations who died before me never came back?" While they both will implore God: "Woe to you; acknowledge!or God's promise is the truth." He would say, "This is nothing but tales from the past!" [46:17]

When Our signs are recited to him, he says: "Tales of the ancients!" [83:13]hese words have been revealed more than 1400 years ago and still we find persons on this world that are fittingto what was described. The last 4 revelations I've listed above fit very well onto Hawking nowadays (May 2011).

What is it with science and religion?eligion has its own rationality and science has its own rationality. What if their rationalities do not count until bothccept and respect each other? Whereas many religious rationalities even differ from each other. But they allmost of them) meat at one common and single point: Everything was/is created by A CREATOR !any religions (except Islam) would go better if they could accept (re-considered) scientific approach. I do notount Islam with the many religions, because Islam does already impose scientific approach from beginning to endt least Islam's holy book the Quran). Unfortunally the Quran isn't being read, preferably burned (by otherligious) and ignored by others (almost every scientist).cience itself would go better and come finally to any conclusions if it would see revelations as eventualformation of truth, that shall become knowledge and would be very helpful to solve any problems. It is thetention of religion, or should be at least, to help mankind solving any problems.he Quran:

rom the point of the Quran, there's no problem at all with the universe we are living in and we are able tobserve. All predictions do fit neatless into observations, as long as you interpret the revelations right. To interprete revelations right, you have to have the right intentions. The Quran would never mislead to any wrong action asng as you have done the interpretations with the right intentions. What are those right intentions? Funny but,ou can't be aware of the right intentions unless you read the Quran. It teaches almost everything you need tochieve reaching the and any truth. And indeed, it's (chronologically revealed) first verse teaches: Read!:

Son Deiiklik: 24.05.11 - 14:32:15 | Sayfa 1/2 - Phenomenons2

http://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons2.pdfhttp://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons2.pdf

8/6/2019 Phenomenons 2

2/2

-ismi ALLAH 'i Rahman-i Rahim...akan OKhenomenons2utlak Dzenden Isnarak ve Yrngelerde Hareket Ederek Tekaml Eden Evren ve nsan Hipotezinin Makalesi.

6:0 In the name of God, the Gracious, the Compassionate.6:1 Read in the name of your Lord who has created.6:2 He created the human being from an embryo.6:3 Read, and your Lord is the Generous One.6:4 The One who taught by the pen.6:5 He taught the human being what he did not know.

hich scientist could say anything controversial to these verses? In which rationality does it not fit? None! But theoint is, many of them are not even aware of it because they didn't read it... They kept their distance, to not beingeen as fools by the public. They take care merely of what people would say, than of what the truth really may ber is. I see it as a kind of intentional purpose of science, denying revelations, so that we all get stuck on thisanet and do not mature (science calls it evolution) into what we were (intelligently) designed for.

Will you not consider, will you not acknowledge ?Where you see randomness and uncertainty, I see intention and purpose.Where you see evolution and mutation, I see maturing and evaluation.ou call it evolution with a huge source of billion years, whereas you can't be sure if it is what it looks.

Where you see explosion and expansion, I see creation and orbiting.or you it may have no sense at all, for me it is to sense itself.

Where you are copying and repeating mindless, without using own intellect;

believe, have faith and use intellect to read and understand what is given.We all observing the same, it is the question of: What we want to see, what we want it to be.ou fear what it could be, I do not and know that it is with purpose and intention.ou fear death, I do not. I hope to achieve the knowledge useful after death.ou don't believe in hereafter, stuck into the material world and all that matters is matter.o way to convince you of things you can't sense. Your unused intellect won't help you to understand what isense.ou keep digging into matter spending billions in search of God/-s, unaware or denying of: There is no God/-s.ou know that it needs a Creator to set up a whole universe, but can't accept that you are helpless, hoping forelp of the God/-s.ou are not reading nor accepting truth spoken words, but senseless words of the created, you like them much.ou call it rational and science without knowing the meaning of the words, that what you think is the truth will

ave you an orphan and alone.ou fear to fail in a limited life, but don't fear a life in the dark or fire of eternal.ou are not aware of the ancients life told to you so you may consider, but wherever you can you repeat theiritter.ou don't want to consider and not acknowledge the truth, all you've needed has come and gone with your faith.ou call it a tale where there might be a truth, call it a truth where and whenever you can not proof.aith you say is ignorance and nonsense, don't you consider the senseless fabricated by yourself ?

Will you not acknowledge at least consider after reading this stuff, how can you hope that one day you'll find theuth ?ou think you are thinking and haven't really done yet...ut wherever one says: I think, so I am. your applause is with them.

23.05.2011, Monday 11:00) *If you think this is a poem, you are wrong! It is indeed not...24.05.2011, Tuesday 13:51) **It is a truly shocking circumstance to see, how unaware or intentionallynorant the western world is and behave, if it comes to knowledge (information that eventually is right) thatas it's source in the Quran. The Quran is being rigorously ignored, whereas any other, even the simplest mysticligion, is being elaborated with and in every single detail. But there is hope that one day every single human

hall at least read the Quran once, because we can see that it is not just ignored anymore; People trying (andaving success) to burn it. I can't understand a mind burning a script just because it is from another religion, butwill have the effect that it is not a subject of unawareness and ignorance anymore, no more. If there must beared something than it must be this. And yes, in this case we can say, that the Quran, as an (eventually)timate and final revelation of A CREATOR, must be the ultimate truth, otherwise it would not have been soindly ignored and hatred. It is very obvious that the information and knowledge it is carrying could be of use oneay, for those who haven't read it yet. This leads me (and should you too) to some conclusions I have to come upith, what actually is happening on this world. My conclusions would not interest anyone neither do I want to beisunderstood (although it won't bother me...), as was the Quran. So I better keep my conclusions for myself.

ut, what I had the chance of summarizing for myself, shall not be in vain hopefully. One day it may helpnderstanding the human mind better. For now, it is just a question of stubbornness beliefs, that may change anyme...Updated 23.05.2011

* Updated 24.05.2011ook out for Phenomenons 3 !

Son Deiiklik: 24.05.11 - 14:32:15 | Sayfa 2/2 - Phenomenons2