23
Presentation to the State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner State Superintendent of Public Instruction

Presentation to the State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation to the State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner State Superintendent of Public Instruction. No Child Left Behind (2001). Yet to be reauthorized States are encouraged to present innovative reforms Waiver offers flexibility from rules in exchange for: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Presentation to the State Board of Education

March 13, 2012

Stan W. HeffnerState Superintendent of

Public Instruction

Page 2: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

No Child Left Behind (2001)

Yet to be reauthorized

States are encouraged to present innovative reforms

Waiver offers flexibility from rules in exchange for:

– Higher student achievement, and – Greater school accountability

11 states now have approved waivers

Page 3: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-1440.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

AYP Goals For Reading & MathP

erc

en

t P

rofi

cie

nt

Page 4: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Without the Waiver

Estimated that 90% of Ohio’s LEAs will not

meet AYP

Page 5: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

AYP Replacement

Reforming SES

Targeted assistance for low-performing schools

Cut red tape

Letter grade report cards

Key Elements of Proposal

Page 6: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

AYP Replacement

AYP calls for 100% proficiency for everyone by 2014-2015: not realistic

New goals:• Implement more rigorous learning

standards• Cut achievement gaps by half over six

years

Page 7: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Reforming SES

Greater quality controls for schools for selecting providers

Page 8: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Targeted Assistance for Low-Performing Schools

New designations:• Priority: Lowest performing 5%, in

addition to SIG schools • Focus: At least 10% of schools with the

largest subgroup achievement gap and graduation gap and not making progress.

Page 9: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Cut Red Tape

Schools freed from some reporting requirements

Greater flexibility in use of federal funds

Page 10: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Excellent with Distinction

Excellent

Effective

Continuous Improvement

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Eliminate Current Rating System

Page 11: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Eliminate Current Rating System

Pending Legislative

Action

Page 12: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Letter Grade Ratings

Letter grades in four areas:– Student performance (Performance Index)– Student progress (Value-Added)– School/District performance (Percent of indicators

met)– Gap closing (AYP)

Overall average grade

Changes will affect 2011-2012 report card, pending legislative action

Page 13: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Letter Grade Rating Scale

Letter Grade Percentage of Measure

A 90% - 100%

B 80% - 89%

C 70% - 79%

D 60% - 69%

F 0% - 59%

Page 14: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Letter Grade Ratings

Page 15: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Letter Grade Ratings

Page 16: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Letter Grade Ratings

Page 17: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Letter Grade Ratings

Page 18: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Letter Grade Ratings

Page 19: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Are You Ready?

Page 20: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner
Page 21: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

2011 Letter Grade Ratings

Current RatingActual 2011

Distribution of LEA Ratings

New Overall Letter-Grade

Simulated 2011 Distribution of LEA

Letter-Grades

Excellent With Distinction 91

A 22Excellent 291

Effective 255 B 406Continuous

Improvement 133 C 195

Academic Watch 63 D 182Academic Emergency 71 F 99

Page 22: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Timeline

Waiver decision in a few months

Changes would begin in the

2012-2013 school year

2011-2012 school year report cards will reflect changes, pending legislative action

Page 23: Presentation to the  State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Questions