View
226
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Group Members
Susan BrunoRandall Ulrich
Mela BennettMela Bennett
Carl Thelen
Derek Derek OliverOliverSummary & ReferencesSummary & References
Summary & ReferencesHandoutsHandouts
Introduction
Lesson
IntroductionIntroduction
Our lesson is about colors. The location is a classroom, though this lesson can really be used anywhere. The level is first grade, so the audience is six-year-olds.
As kids grow up, they learn their colors. However, for them colors are just colors -- they don't have any different categories. Yet. Our lesson introduces them to the most basic category of colors, the Primary Colors. You remember those, right? Red, yellowyellow, blue. Not the new-fangled RGB used in computer graphics, or Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Black used in printing. Just red, yellowyellow, and blue, like our shirts.
Introduction
Per Pritchard's plan including concept, rule, and critical attributes:Our concept is Primary Colors.
The rulerule is: Primary colors are Red, YellowYellow, and Blue.
The critical attributes are: A) It's a color. B) It's red, yellowyellow or blueC) The object doesn't matter; only the color matters.
Introduction
We will try to use both the concept attainment model and multiple intelligences in our lesson, using visuals and physical toys. And shirts.
So Susan will begin with background information and the lesson. . . .
Attention Class!Attention Class!
Now that you are all six years old again, please give Mela your attention. She has a fun activity for you!
Now that you are all six years old again, please give Mela your attention. She has a fun activity for you!
Boulware & Crow Article
• The Concept Attainment Strategy is an instructional technique proposed by Jerome Bruner (Bruner, 1966; Joyce, Weil, & Calhoun, 2004) that targets the “big idea” or concept.
• The strategy focuses on the meaning or understanding of a concept rather than on what the concept is called.
• Learners are given specific steps to scaffold their thinking, which include viewing examples as well as nonexamples of a concept.
• Phase 1: The Concept to Be Taught.
• Phase 2: Testing Attainment of the Concept.
• Phase 3: Analysis.
Joyce, Weil, & Calhoun BookJoyce, Weil, & Calhoun Book
• Concept Attainment versus Concept FormationConcept Attainment versus Concept Formation
o Concept AttainmentConcept Attainment: "search for and listing of attributes that : "search for and listing of attributes that can be used to distinguish exemplars from nonexamplars" can be used to distinguish exemplars from nonexamplars" (quoting Bruner, Goodnow, and Austin (1967)). (p. 108.)(quoting Bruner, Goodnow, and Austin (1967)). (p. 108.)
o Concept FormationConcept Formation: basis of the inductive reasoning model. : basis of the inductive reasoning model. (p. 108.)(p. 108.)
• ExemplarsExemplars: a subset of a collection of data. (p. 111): a subset of a collection of data. (p. 111)
• AttributesAttributes: data that has features. (p. 111): data that has features. (p. 111)
Joyce, Weil, & Calhoun BookJoyce, Weil, & Calhoun Book
Joyce, Weil, & Calhoun, quoting (Tennyson and Joyce, Weil, & Calhoun, quoting (Tennyson and
Cocchiarella (1986): "...the first positive exemplars Cocchiarella (1986): "...the first positive exemplars
presented should be the presented should be the clearest possible prototypesclearest possible prototypes..." ..."
(p.116)(p.116)
ReferencesReferences
Boulware, B., & Crow, M. L. (2008, March). Using the concept Boulware, B., & Crow, M. L. (2008, March). Using the concept attainment strategy to enhance reading comprehension. attainment strategy to enhance reading comprehension. Reading TeacherReading Teacher, , 6161(6), 491-495. Retrieved January 20, (6), 491-495. Retrieved January 20, 2009, from ERIC database.2009, from ERIC database.
Johnson, J., Carlson, S., Kastl, J., & Kastl, R. (1992, Johnson, J., Carlson, S., Kastl, J., & Kastl, R. (1992, November/December). Developing conceptual November/December). Developing conceptual thinking: The concept attainment model. Clthinking: The concept attainment model. Clearing earing House, 66House, 66(2), 117-121. Retrieved January 20, 2009, (2), 117-121. Retrieved January 20, 2009, from ERIC database.from ERIC database.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Models of teachingteaching (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Williams, P., & Carnine, D. (1981). Relationship between Williams, P., & Carnine, D. (1981). Relationship between range of examples and of instructions and attention in range of examples and of instructions and attention in concept attainment. concept attainment. Journal of Educational ResearchJournal of Educational Research, , 7474(3). Retrieved January 19, 2009, from Academic (3). Retrieved January 19, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database.Search Premier database.
Pritchard, F. F. (1994). Teaching thinking across the Pritchard, F. F. (1994). Teaching thinking across the curriculum with the concept attainment model. curriculum with the concept attainment model. Descriptive report. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from Descriptive report. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from ERIC database.ERIC database.
References available in accompanying handoutReferences available in accompanying handout