Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Project Overview and Status
June 17, 2014
Loreen Bobo, P.E.I-4 Ultimate Construction Program Manager
Improvements
• Length: 21 miles from west of
Kirkman Road to East of SR 434• Orange and Seminole Counties
• Cost: $2.323 billion (yoe) in
design/construction costs
• What: Reconstruction of mainline
and interchanges
• What: Addition of 4(four) Express
Lanes (4Express)
• Design/Construction Duration:
~ 6.5 years
Improvements
• Reconstruction of 15 interchanges
• 3 system-to-system interchanges
• Over 60 new bridges
• Over 70 bridge replacements
• 2 new pedestrian crossings at • Maitland Blvd. and SR 436
• Increase design speed to 60 mph
• P3 – public-private partnership• Design-build-finance-operate-maintain• I-4 Mobility Partners chosen 4/23/14
6 general use lanes + auxiliary lanes
4 Express Lanes (2 in each direction)
Interstate Typical Section
Interstate Typical Section
Emergency access gates will be provided between the Express Lanes and general use lanes at a minimum of every 2 miles.
General Use Lanes
Express
Lanes
Planned Access to Express Lanes
• FDOT will set the toll rates and collect
the tolls.
• Access to and from the tolled express
lanes will be limited
• Barrier wall separated
• Slip ramp access
• Direct ramp access
• Six to seven access points in each
direction
• Variable tolling
• All Electronic Tolling
• Everyone pays
• No heavy trucks
I-4 Ultimate Aesthetics
• Enhanced treatments levels
• Decorative columns
• Special lighting
• Color coordinated
• Landscaping
Noise Barriers
Corridor Options
SunRail
Public Private PartnershipsValue Proposition
P3 Seeks to Achieve 5 Primary Goals • Provide capacity improvements much sooner than possible under
traditional pay-as-you go approach – 20 years sooner!
• Eliminate project phasing and advance the overall project
• Capitalize on the private sector’s innovation and access to capital markets
• Transfer of appropriate risk items to private partner
• Enhance long-term, lifecycle cost efficiency and service quality
Availability PaymentsType of P3
• The “owner,” meaning the government entity, “pays” to the extent the facility is open to traffic and meets contractual performance specifications for operations and maintenance.
• Typically used for projects with established traffic.
• May be used for toll deals where goal is to maximize use or reduce congestion, rather than to maximize revenue.
• Example: 595 Express, Port of Miami Tunnel, • Florida’s Turnpike Service Plazas
Estimated Costs
• Capital Cost (Design and Construction): $2.4 billion (Year of Expenditure – YOE)
• $54 million toward local roads
• Operations and Maintenance: $378 million over contract
• Renewal and Replacement: $493 million over contract
• Other (SPV, Insurance, Interest, Finance): Varies
Not actuals from Best Value Proposer
Financial Details
Strategic Corridor 7%Other State
Funds 2%
SIS Allocation - 20%
Other Federal -
4%
DS and DDR - 6%
OOCEA, Turnpike
4%
Toll Revenu
e 57%
FUND-ING
Timeline
March 4, 2013 Industry Forum
March 5-6, 2013 One on One’s with interested teams (8)
March 8, 2013 Request for Qualifications
June 5, 2013 Short-listed 4 teams (out of 7), RFP released
February 12, 2014 Technical Proposals due (4 received)
March 13, 2014 Financial Proposals due (4 received)
April 23, 2014 Best Value Selection – I-4 Mobility Partners
Late Summer 2014 Financial close, contract signed
After Financial Close Start design (NTP 1)
4+ months later Construction;operations & maintenance (NTP 2)
2020/2021 Construction completed
Full O&M starts, replacement & renewals
2054 Contract ends
Request for Proposals
Instructions to Proposers (ITP): Procurement Document
Volume I: Concession Agreement (CA)
435 pages, including 26 appendices
Volume II: Technical Requirements
495 pages
Section 1: Project Description
Section 2: Project Requirements and Provisions for Work
Section 3: Design and Construction Requirements
Attachment 1 – ITS Deployment Requirements
Attachment 2 – Tolls Infrastructure Requirements
Attachment 3 – QAM and QAF Requirements
Attachment 4 – QA/QC Requirement
Section 4: Operations & Maintenance Requirements
Section 5: Handback Requirements
Volume III: Additional Mandatory Standards
Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s)From ITP
Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s) Confidential
RFP was not changed if an ATC was allowed 5 meetings with each team, in person Quick turn around needed Team of 25 + people from different disciplines participated in the process. Base Line and Grade – Any deviation of more than 5 feet had to be submitted
Alternative Financial Concepts (AFC’s) Not confidential Teleconferences with each team
One on One meetings Four Meetings with each team Contract Issues rather than technical
Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s)From ITP
• Set forth the process for FDOT’s review and acceptance of technical concepts that
conflict with the requirements of the Contract Documents
• This process is intended to allow Proposers to incorporate technical innovation and
creativity into their Proposals
• To be eligible for consideration, proposed ATCs must result in performance, quality and
utility of the end product that is equal to or better than the performance, quality and
utility of the end product that would result from full compliance with the Contract
Documents
Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s)From ITP
• A proposed ATC may not be approved if, in FDOT’s sole discretion, it is premised upon
or would require (a) a reduction in quantities without achieving equal or better
performance, quality and utility; (b) a reduction in performance, quality, utility or
reliability; (c) major changes to the existing Environmental Approvals, including
changes that would trigger the need for a supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement under NEPA; (d) a Change in Law; or (e) multiple or material additional
right of way parcels.
Possible ATC Responses
(A) The proposed ATC is acceptable for inclusion in the Proposal (with such conditions,modifications or requirements as identified by FDOT). Approval dates are noted below.Conditional Approval requirements are provided in Attachment 1.
(B) The proposed ATC is not acceptable for inclusion in the Proposal.
(C) The proposed ATC is not acceptable in its present form, but may be acceptable upon thesatisfaction, in FDOT’s sole discretion, of certain identified conditions which must be met orclarifications or modifications that must be made prior to resubmittal (FDOT will not utilize this response after the final submission date for ATCs).
(D) The proposed ATC appears to comply with the Contract Documents and does not require an ATC as to the specific provision of the Contract Documents identified by the Proposer in itsproposed ATC (provided, however, that should it turn out that the concept as incorporated into the Proposal is not within the requirements of the Contract Documents, FDOT reserves the right to require compliance with the requirements of the Contract Documents, in which event the Proposer will not be entitled to modify its Proposal or receive additional compensation or a time extension under the Agreement).
(E) Although the submittal does not require an ATC because it appears to comply with theContract Documents, it may not be included in the Proposer’s Proposal and FDOT will modify the Contract Documents to preclude the concept.
ATC Stats
ATC Stats
I-4 ULTIMATEProposal Scores
Technical Proposal Criteria [Up to 60 points]Technical Proposal Qualitative Assessment - 35 points
Preliminary Corridor Master Plan Submittal Evaluation Criteria Operation and Maintenance Evaluation Criteria
Baseline Construction Period - 5 pointsInclusion of Direct Connection Proposal - 5 pointsProject Technical Enhancements - 15 points
Financial Proposal Criteria [Up to 40 points]Financial Price - 35 pointsFeasibility of Financial Proposal - 5 points
EEO, DBE, SB & OJT
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Goal
9% for Construction
9% for Design
9% for Operations and Maintenance
Small Business (SB) Goal (non DBE)
3% for Construction
3% for Design
3% for Operations & Maintenance
On-the-Job Training (OJT) Goal
250 trainees
595 Express - Ft. Lauderdale
595 Express: P3, $1.2 billion design and construction, began construction in 2008, opened to traffic in March 2014.
DBE goal was 8.6% (FY actuals)
08/09 - 9.0%09/10 - 9.2% 10/11 - 8.7% 11/12 - 10.6%12/13 – 17.0%13/14—33.3% (CURRENTLY PROJECTED)4 females working in construction crafts (last year’s report)
On-the-Job Training (OJT) goal
118 trainees (goal) 164 graduated!
Employed on the job
1,728 (average) 2,160 (at peak)
Public InformationCommunity Outreach
• Project website
• Public information
• Lane/ramp closures
• Developing a mobile app
• Project videos
Loreen Bobo, P.E.FDOT Project ContactConstruction Program [email protected]
Project Video
Project Video
