Public Disclosure Authorized 45564 - World Bank...ATC area traffic control BEST Bombay Electricity and Suburban Transport Corporation EMS efficiency monitoring system CR Central Railway

INDIA MUMBAI URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT – PROJECT RESTRUCTURING

PROJECT PAPER

Date: MM/DD/YY Country: INDIA Project Name: Mumbai Urban Transport Project (MUTP) Project ID: P050668

Task Team Leader: Hubert Nove-Josserand Sector Manager: Michel Audigé Acting Country Director: Rachid Benmessaoud Environmental category: A

Borrower: Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi – 110 001 Responsible agencies: Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) Address: Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051 Contact Person: Mr. Milind Mhaiskar, Project Director, MUTP Tel.: 91-22-26590001; Fax: 91-22-26591264; Email: [email protected] Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation Limited Address: 2nd Floor, Churchgate Station Building, Mumbai – 400 020 Contact Person: Mr. P. C. Sehgal, Managing Director Tel.: 91-22- 022-22080015; Fax: 91-22- 22096972; Email: [email protected]

Revised estimated disbursements (Bank FY/US$m) FY 2008 2009 2010 Annual 40 185 144 Cumulative 226 411 555 Original closing date: June 30, 2008 Current closing date: September 30, 2008 Revised closing date : December 31, 2009 Indicate if the restructuring is: Board approved X RVP approved ___ Does the restructured project require any exceptions to Bank policies? Have these been approved by Bank management? Is approval for any policy exception sought from the Board?

__ Yes X No Yes __ No __ Yes _X No

Revised project development objective/outcomes : outcomes modified Does the restructured project trigger any new safeguard policies? No

Revised Financing Plan (US$m.) Source Local Foreign Total

Borrower IBRD IDA (62.50 SDRm.) Total

560 342 78 980

8121 14 143

568 463 92

1123 Exchange rate (December 28, 2007): US$ 1 = 39.4 INR; SDR 1 = US$ 1.57

45564

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

2

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate: December 28, 2007)

Currency Unit = Indian Rupees

INR 39.4 = US$1.0

FISCAL YEAR April 1 – March 31

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ATC area traffic control BEST Bombay Electricity and Suburban Transport Corporation EMS efficiency monitoring system CR Central Railway GOI Government of India GOM Government of Maharashtra IMP Independent Monitoring Panel JVLR Jogeshwari-Vikhroli Link Road MCGM Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai MIS management information system MMR Mumbai Metropolitan Region MMRDA Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority MRVC Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation Limited MSRDC Maharashtra State Roads Development Corporation MURP Mumbai Urban Rehabilitation Project MUTP Mumbai Urban Transport Project PAHs project affected households PAP project affected people PCU passenger car unit PGSS pedestrian subways PHPD peak hour per direction R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation RIP Resettlement Implementation Plan ROB Road Over rail Bridges SATIS Station Area Traffic Improvement Schemes SCLR Santa-Cruz-Chembur Link Road TMU Traffic Management Unit WR Western Railway

INDIA

MUMBAI URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT – PROJECT RESTRUCTURING

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. Introductory Statement ............................................................................................................ 5

B. Background and Reasons for Restructuring .......................................................................... 5

Status of the project and rating ................................................................................................... 6 Inspection Panel and Resettlement Action Plan.......................................................................... 8 Reasons for restructuring .......................................................................................................... 11

C. Proposed Changes................................................................................................................... 12

Deletion ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Use of the balance of IDA funds................................................................................................ 13 Addition ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Implementation period .............................................................................................................. 13 Revised cost of the project......................................................................................................... 14

D. Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 15

Additional justification for the new activities............................................................................ 15 Impact of deleted activities on economic evaluation................................................................. 15 Safeguards issues: resettlement, environment, etc. ................................................................... 15 Funds flow for the Part A of the project.................................................................................... 15 Preparedness for the proposed activities .................................................................................. 16 Covenants adjustments .............................................................................................................. 16

E. Benefits and Risks ................................................................................................................... 16

Benefits ...................................................................................................................................... 16 Risks .......................................................................................................................................... 16

Annex 1: Status of Implementation of the Resettlement Action Plan as on June 30, 2008... 18

Annex 2: Borrower’s Request for Restructuring and Extension of Project Period, DEA Letter dated March 31st. 2008 .............................................................................................. 30

Annex 3: Borrower’s Request for Further Extension of Project Period for Rail Component, DEA Letter dated August 28, 2008 ................................................................ 54

Annex 4: Key Performance Indicators ...................................................................................... 57

Annex 5: Procedure for Implementation of Balance of Resettlement Activities for Road Over Bridges (ROB).............................................................................................................. 61

Annex 6: Cost Table per Category............................................................................................ 62

Annex 7: Incorporation of Lessons from the DIR ................................................................... 63

5

A. INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT 1. This Project Paper seeks the approval of the Executive Directors to introduce the following changes in the INDIA, Mumbai Urban Transport Project (Loan N0. 4665-IN/ Credit No. 3662-IN) and any accompanying amendments to the project’s legal documents. The proposed changes aim at establishing a more realistic implementation schedule for the remainder of the project taking into account the reduced scope that can be financed by the IBRD loan as a result of the appreciation of the Indian Rupee compared to the US dollar. The closing date of the Bank loan and credit is September 2008. Progress has been slow in all components of the project and most of the activities would require a 15-month extension of the implementation period to be largely completed. Other activities (road over rail bridges, station area traffic improvement schemes) face challenges that are likely to delay their completion by several years. Besides, the appreciation of the Indian Rupee against the US dollar has reduced the funds available from Bank financing and some essential activities already being implemented will require additional funds. The major proposed modifications include: i) deletion of several traffic management improvements and technical assistance, ii) additional investment in bus efficiency, iii) reimbursement to MUTP IDA Credit of funds that were utilized for procuring buildings that will not be used to house MUTP Affected People, iv) financing from the IDA credit of activities under the rail component, and v) extension of the implementation period of the Credit and the Loan until December 31, 2009. The completion of the rail component and of an important link road is expected to be achieved only in the year 2010 but it is recommended to wait until several key impediments are eliminated to consider a further extension of the project closing date. B. BACKGROUND AND REASONS FOR RESTRUCTURING 2. MUTP was approved by the Bank’s Board of Executive Directors on June 18, 2002 (Loan No. 4665-IN; Credit No. 3662-IN).1 The total Project cost initially was USD 945.0 million, of which USD 463.0 million is financed by an IBRD Loan, SDR 62.5 million (USD 79.0 million equivalent) by an IDA Credit, and additional financing of USD 403.0 million from the Government of India (GoI). The Project became effective on November 6, 2002 and is being implemented by the Mumbai Rail Vikas Corporation (MRVC); the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM); the Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST); the Maharashtra State Roads Development Corporation (MSRDC); the Mumbai Traffic Police; and the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) on behalf of the Government of Maharashtra (GoM) and the Borrower (GoI). MMRDA is the coordinating agency and is responsible for implementing the resettlement and rehabilitation component on behalf of all the implementing agencies.

3. The Project Development Objective is to facilitate urban economic growth and improve quality of life by fostering the development of an efficient and sustainable urban

1 It should be noted that during the preparation phase, the resettlement and rehabilitation aspects were for some time considered to be implemented as a separate, but complementary project, the Mumbai Urban Rehabilitation Project (MURP).

6

transport system including effective institutions to meet the needs of the users in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR). 4. The Project consists of three components: • Component 1 -- Rail Transport, the main activities of which are: (a) improvement of

capacity and performance of the suburban rail network of the Central and Western Railways through provision of infrastructure, (track additions, signaling systems power, etc.), new rolling stock (101 9-car electric motor units); and (b) technical assistance.

• Component 2 -- Road-based Transport, the main activities of which are: (a) area traffic control (250 junctions), selected traffic management infrastructure schemes (pedestrian crossings, station areas, over bridges, etc.) implemented by MCGM; (b) buses (644) procured by BEST; (c) road widening to facilitate two East-West linkages, the Jogeshwari-Vikhroli Link Road (JVLR) and Santa Cruz-Chembur Link Road (SCLR), three Road Over rail Bridges (ROB), implemented by MMRDA/MSRDC; and (d) technical assistance.

• Component 3 -- Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R), comprising mainly: construction of housing, and provision of services for resettlement and rehabilitation of project-affected families, implemented by MMRDA and financed with an IDA credit.

Status of the project and rating 5. Achievement of the Project Development Objectives is rated “Moderately Satisfactory.” Since its start the project has made significant progress towards the achievement of the development objectives. As a result of the resettlement of squatters along rail tracks and the completion of track doubling on the Western Railway corridor, the efficiency of suburban train operations has increased with rise in its peak time capacity by 7-10 percent and reduction in commuting time by 4 to 9 minutes for about 6 million daily passengers. An improvement in transport services in terms of quality and comfort is noticed as a result of the addition of a few new trains and the replacement of 644 buses by new ones. However improvements in traffic management technical capacity within the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai have not been sustained. 6. Implementation Progress (IP) is rated “Moderately Unsatisfactory.” Progress has been slow in all components of the project, which is reflected in a low level of disbursement (41% of the Credit and Loan after six years of implementation). Completion of most of the activities would require an extension of the implementation period of the project. As described below, implementation of some activities have not yet started and others face challenges that may delay their implementation by several years.

7

Table 1: Project at a Glance Project Financing at Appraisal (2002):

IBRD*: Component 1 (Rail) Component 2 (Road) IDA: Component 3 (R&R)

GoI: TOTAL

At Appraisal (2002) USD million

463.00 304.90 150.50 79.00 (SDR 62.5) 79.00

403.00 945.00

At Restructuring (2008) USD million

463.00 304.90 150.50 92.00 (SDR 62.5) 92.00

568.00 1123.00

Disbursed IBRD: IDA: TOTAL

January 31 2007 115.70 (25%) 68.70 (87%)

184.40 (34.0%)

July 04, 2008 157.45 (34%) 69.34 (88%) 226.79 (41.8%)

July 04, 2008 157.45 (34%) 69.34 (75%)

226.79 (40.8%) Note: exchange rate at time of restructuring (1 SDR = 1.57 US$) applied on undisbursed balance

* including the Project Preparation Facility and Front End Fee of USD 7.63 million.

7. Implementation progress of the Rail component was rated satisfactory after July 2007 and has been rated moderately satisfactory after the recent mission in July 2008 because of slower than expected manufacturing of railcars (EMUs). Procurement of EMUs and completion of the Rail component is now expected be achieved by June 2010 or a few months later. The bus component has been completed satisfactorily. The Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) component is almost complete and the process of resettlement including some difficult cases has improved significantly over the past two years. The Area Traffic Control contract has commenced and two pedestrian subways (PGSS) are in advanced stages of construction. However, implementation of the other traffic management activities including three Road Over Bridges (ROB) and four Station Area Traffic Improvement Schemes (SATIS) has not yet started due to the lack of pro-activeness and inadequate interagency coordination among the concerned agencies. Other traffic management activities or studies have not yet started. Civil works on two arterial roads JVLR and SCLR have started but not shown significant physical progress over the last one and half years. However, the quality of the work schedules has improved over the last year and key progress in land acquisition and resettlement have resulted in availability of large work fronts for the contractors, which leads one to believe that with a 15-months time extension these key components could be largely completed. It is expected that JVLR will be completed by December 2009, while SCLR will completed later in 2010 assuming that certain key impediments can be cleared on time. 8. Financial management and procurement: Financial management is rated moderately satisfactory. There are no outstanding audit reports awaited. Past financial management issues relating to the R&R component have been resolved; contractual arrangements between MMRDA and the NGO SPARC have been re-set in line with Bank guidelines. However, the accounting and internal audit capacity at MMRDA seems to be constrained, and the reconciliation between the accounts of MMRDA and other

8

agencies is not yet complete. Procurement is rated moderately satisfactory. Most part of the procurement has been completed; the remaining procurement risks are limited as they concern only a reduced investment amount. 9. Safeguards: Overall the project is rated moderately satisfactory for compliance with applicable safeguards policies. The environmental management plans (EMPs) relevant to the construction phase of the various subprojects under implementation in the road component (JVLR, SCLR and PGSS) and in the rail component (Virar Car Shed, Mahim-Santa-Cruz Line and TSSs) are in place and address the environmental safeguards issues. MMRDA is implementing community environmental management plans at the resettlement colonies with the help of consultants and with the participation of PAP housing societies. Although MMRDA is making good progress with resettlement, this component is rated moderately satisfactory pending full implementation of the Action Plan agreed with the Board as follow up of the Inspection Panel investigation. If MMRDA continues to progress along current lines, this component will reach a fully satisfactory status soon. Inspection Panel and Resettlement Action Plan 10. On March 28, 2006, the Executive Directors discussed the findings of the Inspection Panel’s Investigation Report and the Management Report and Recommendations on the India Mumbai Urban Transport Project (MUTP). At the beginning of March 2006, Management had suspended funding of two components (road and resettlement) of the project, in light of concerns regarding the equitable resettlement and rehabilitation of the people affected by the road component. The Management Report focused on implementation issues, including the resettlement procedures for shopkeepers with medium- and large-size shops, restoration of incomes, post-resettlement services, baseline data, grievance redress mechanisms, and the quality of supervision. The Board endorsed the Management Report’s Action Plan that had been prepared in close consultation with the Government of Maharashtra (GoM) and agreed that an update report would be provided periodically on progress made in its implementation. 11. The GoM substantially met the Bank’s conditions to address the outstanding issues, and the suspension was lifted on June 29, 2006. One condition, completion of negotiations with the Santa-Cruz-Chembur Link Road (SCLR) shopkeepers, was waived because: (a) the Resettlement Implementation Plan (RIP) for SCLR, including a satisfactory set of procedures for negotiation, had been finalized and disclosed; (b) negotiations had started; and (c) further extension of the suspension might have given shopkeepers unrealistic expectations of extensive rehabilitation beyond the set of alternatives agreed upon between the Bank and the GoM. However, Management informed the Borrower that it would maintain active supervision of the project and that it might have to seek remedies, including suspension of the balance of the loan, if resettlement activities were not carried out in conformity with the agreed procedures. 12. Bank Management presented twice to the Board progress reports on the implementation of the Action Plan. These reports were submitted in March and November 2007, and another progress report will be submitted to the Board in November 2008. Last November’s report noted that MMRDA had made noteworthy progress in

9

reaching mutually-acceptable and compliant solutions with the shopkeepers and recorded the clear progress made on a number of management indicators related to: shifting of shopkeepers, registration of cooperative housing societies of the project affected people (PAP), issuance of identity cards to PAPs, transfer of community facilities to co-operative societies and strengthening MMRDA’s management capacity by filling up key staff positions and outsourcing technical expertise for resettlement-related activities. The report also noted that the Independent Monitoring Panel (IMP) has been playing an important role in contributing to better outcomes, monitoring, and quality assurance.

Table 2: Implementation Progress in Shifting of PAHs (as of June 30, 2008)

Unit Type Totals Resettled To be Resettled

Households 17,378 16,158 (93%) 1,220 (6.8%)

Shops ( of which above 225 sq. ft)

2569 ( 800 )

1,3632 (53%) (354 i.e. 44%)

1,206 (47%) (446 i.e. 56%)

Total 19,947 17,521 (88%) 2,426 (12% )

13. MMRDA has so far resettled 17,521 project affected households (PAHs) out of 19,947 PAHs, i.e. about 88% of PAHs (93 % residential and 53 % commercial) in permanent resettlement colonies. Considerable progress has been made in implementing the agreed R&R Action Plan of February 2006. Substantial clearance of impediments has been achieved with relocation of most shopkeepers and residential PAPs from the Jogeshwari-Vikhroli Link Road (JVLR), relocation of a majority of residential PAPs and a good number of shopkeepers including from the group of large and medium size shops along Santa-Cruz-Chembur Link Road (SCLR). This has made substantial stretches available for civil works. 14. Key achievements in post-resettlement activities include: (a) further strengthening of MMRDA's capacity to manage R&R activities with appointment of the Chief-Post Resettlement and reinforcement of the Chief-Engineer’s unit with an additional team to address civil work related issues in resettlement sites; (b) significant progress in registration of co-operative housing societies with 150 societies fully registered compared to 65 in July 2007; (c) completion of transfer of common facilities to 163 societies compared to 47 societies in July 2007; (d) transfer of community management funds (CMF) to 99 societies; transfer of interest on society maintenance and management funds till January 2008 to 46 societies; and opening up of joint accounts (society funds) for 52 societies from where societies can directly receive interest; (e) completion of capacity building activities in R&R colonies by the post resettlement consultant (TCS); (f) strengthening of MMRDA's capacity to manage post-resettlement activities (after TCS’s exit) with two community development associates appointed and two executive engineers

2 In addition, 76 shopkeepers having joined an in situ redevelopment scheme have voluntarily cleared affected portion of their shops at Kismat Nagar along SCLR. Another 80 shopkeepers are expected to clear up affected portions of their shops once they enter into a MoU with MMRDA providing for their resettlement in a new shopping complex at MN Nagar. The MoU is expected to be signed in near future.

10

for estate management; (g) completion of the independent Resettlement Impact Assessment Study for Mankhurd, Anik and Majas relocation sites; and (h) opening of the multi-lingual primary schools at Anik and Mankhurd; (i) efforts made to address income restoration issues of resettled youth and vulnerable women3; (k) completion of major repair works in resettlement buildings; (j) implementation of environment management plan at Kanjurmarg site on a pilot basis and preparation of environment management action plans for all MUTP resettlement sites with exit indicators. Other activities being monitored independent of the GoM R&R Action Plan that have progressed well, include: completion of about two-third of repair works addressing problems such as seepage, leakage, and drainage in resettlement sites4; placing about 80% of the required number of waste disposal bins in the resettlement colonies; and steps to integrate resettlement colonies into the city’s urban service network in coordination with the Mumbai Municipal Corporation; step taken to open a health care centre at the Anik resettlement site5; and establishment of 5 field grievance centers by MMRDA in order to resolve resettlement site specific problems and issues. Active monitoring of the post-resettlement activities by the Independent Monitoring Panel has added value to efforts being made to improve living conditions in the resettlement sites. 15. Other areas of progress in R&R activities include: (a) preparation of the Resettlement Implementation Plan (RIP) for Vikhroli ROB; (b) issuance of identity cards to 16,897 PAHs, compared to 7,233 in July, 2007; (c) disclosure on the MMRDA website of lists of over 17,000 resettled PAHs; (c) continued consultation with commercial PAPs for their relocation, which resulted in preparation of the RIP for Vikhroli ROB, relocation of shopkeepers from JVLR-II, and site clearance by 76 shopkeepers at Kismat Nagar (SCLR) following agreement with MMRDA for their in-situ resettlement. 16. The implementation of the Action Plan has fallen behind schedule in respect of a few actions such as: (a) relocation of religious and community properties due to difficulties in identifying relocation sites and strong popular sensitivities involved; (b) relocation of title holders (MHADA building residents) and completion of land acquisition activities for SCLR; (c) and final relocation of the large- and medium-size shopkeepers. MMRDA continues to make use of its Excel/Visual Basic database, as it continues to pursue further development of the Oracle database. 17. The Bank task team continues to assist MMRDA with technical support for implementing the RR Action plan and is closely monitoring its progress. In view of the quality of compliance in the R&R component, the focus of technical support offered and monitoring done has gradually shifted to strategic implementation issues. In view of this, the Bank has, since January 2008, reduced the involvement of its dedicated consultant to a half time involvement with two third of the consultant time spent in Mumbai. The progress of individual actions in the action plan is described in the Annex 1.

3 Some details of post resettlement activities given in para 28 of Annex-1 4 MMRDA has also agreed on a set of “environmental exit indicators” in order to ensure that pending civil work related repairs are completed upfront as a condition for program exit from the resettlement colonies. 5 MMRDA has recently handed over 6 tenements to MCGM for opening a dispensary on a pilot basis, which can be replicated in other large resettlement sites.

11

18. Lessons Learned & Opportunities. The project has so far produced a number of additional benefits and lessons learned, particularly on the process of institution building of MMRDA and the restoration of the livelihoods of the affected persons, which will pave the way towards a more inclusive, participative urban development process. It has given a good insight into the challenges of Urban India and the role that the Bank can play in this context. Specific lessons learned include the following, many of which have fed into the design of operations Bank-wide:

• The development role of the Bank to help in a slow but gradual change in the mindset of the Government from a bureaucratic to a more sustainable and consultative approach to resettlement;

• The transition from an administrative “compensation” oriented approach towards a “win-win” negotiated problem solving approach in dealing with shopkeepers;

• Entitlement of all affected persons: Almost 98% of affected persons were non-title holders, and under the project, have received ownership title of their resettlement houses or shops, enhancing their living standards (e.g. better quality houses, access to water and sanitation);

• Transparent list of eligible affected persons through baseline survey and public disclosure reduced scope for confusion among people;

• Setting in place transparent and accountable Grievance redress mechanism through recognized committees enhanced credibility and ownership;

• The need to strengthen the capacity of both NGOs and government agencies to handle complex resettlement issues and oversee the coordination with the civil works;

• The post-resettlement support to improve sustainable self management of their affairs by the resettled people in their new environment; and

• The importance of consultation and communication by the Government throughout the project cycle.

Reasons for restructuring 19. Progress has been slow in all components and most of the activities would require an extension of the implementation period of the project to be completed. Implementation of some activities has not yet started or faces challenges that will most likely delay their completion by several years. But it is believed that with the proposed refocusing of the project scope on activities that are critical for the achievement of the project objectives, these can be completed and relevant outcomes largely attained within the extended period of the loan/credit that is part of the proposed project restructuring, with the exception of SCLR and a small part of the railway component that will be completed only in 2010. On the three Road Over Bridges initially in the project scope, no construction contract has been signed yet; however, resettlement and land acquisition activities have been partly completed. In case of the Station Area Traffic Improvement Schemes (SATIS), even resettlement action plans have not been prepared due to delay in finalization of designs and identification of relocation sites for the project affected people. Only two pedestrian subways are under construction and are expected to be completed soon. The financial

12

provision for traffic management improvement has not yet seen any beginning of utilization by the traffic management unit of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM). Key activities such as completion of resettlement and rehabilitation and construction of JVLR are expected to be achieved before the end of December 2009, the new proposed loan/credit closing date. 20. Preparatory works have started for the 5th rail line between Santa-Cruz and Mahim Church. The Harbor Line Flyover at Mahim has started but line related works will not be completed before the new proposed closing date. 21. The Bus related sub-component has performed well and the disbursement has been completed; and the proposed additional activities are expected to enhance efficiency of bus operations by way of establishing a management information system (MIS) and fitting fuel efficiency monitoring devices in buses. 22. The appreciation of the Indian Rupee compared to the US dollar has reduced the financing amount available. Though some essential activities already being implemented will require more funds and time to be completed, it has been decided not to consider any increase in the loan amount, but to use the increased financing amount available in the credit amount as a result of the appreciation of the SDR compared to the US dollar. C. PROPOSED CHANGES 23. The Government of Maharahstra submitted on March 10, 2008 a request for restructuring the MUTP loan and credit and for extending the implementation period of the project. This request was transmitted to the Bank by DEA on March 31st, 2008. The proposed changes in the request are described below. The request is presented in Annex 2. Deletion 24. Several activities are proposed to be deleted from the scope of MUTP as follows:

Road Component: • It is proposed to IBRD to take out of the project the Station Area Traffic

Improvement Schemes (SATIS). Six of them were included in the original scope and this number had been reduced to four at mid-term because of cost increases. These schemes are still at the design stage.

• It is proposed to IBRD to take out of the project the three Road Over Bridges (ROBs) that were meant to facilitate the elimination of level crossings along the Western and the Central Railway corridors. No construction works has yet been started for these facilities.

• It is proposed to IBRD to reduce the number of pedestrian subways (PGSS) in the project to two from the current six included in the project (retained from the original 26 foreseen at the outset). For two of the deleted PGSS, construction works, which had significantly started, have been stopped and the original condition of safety restored.

• It is proposed to IBRD to take out of the project the provision for traffic management improvements developed as part of the technical assistance to the

13

Traffic Management Unit (TMU) of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM). This activity has not yet started.

• It is proposed to IBRD to take out of the project the assistance to be given to the traffic police to strengthen the accident recording system and black spot improvement scheme. This activity has not yet started.

• It is proposed to IBRD to take out of the project the technical assistance to be given to the Transport Commissioner’s office for vehicular emission control.

Resettlement& Rehabilitation Component: • It is proposed to IDA to take out of the project the buildings that have been

procured but will not be used to house MUTP affected people. The Government will reimburse to MUTP IDA Credit the funds provided for procurement of these buildings.

Rail Component: • It is proposed to take out of the project the track laying related to the addition

of a 5th line on the Western Railway corridor between Santa-Cruz and Mahim and to limit the scope of the project to off-line works. It is also proposed to delete from the scope of the project the modification of the Harbor Line flyover at Mahim. These activities are not financed by the World Bank, but out of the Counterpart Fund.

Use of the balance of IDA funds 25. The remaining balance of IDA after disbursement for the activities planned as part of the R&R Component is estimated at about USD 23 million, including the amount freed by the reimbursement related to the unused buildings, which is estimated at INR 310 million, i.e. USD 8 million or SDR 5 million. In parallel there is a need of about USD 30 million of additional allocation for the completion of the Rail Component due to an escalation in contract costs and reduction of the value of the US dollar compared to the Indian Rupee and the Euro. Therefore it is proposed to use USD 23 million of the available IDA balance to finance activities under the Rail Component and the remaining balance for other eligible activities. To that end the Borrower will reimburse to IDA the amount of INR 310 million corresponding to the construction cost of the buildings taken out of the project. This reimbursement will be effected before the same amount is made available by IDA for the rail activities and before December 31st, 2008.

Addition 26. A few new activities are proposed to be included in the scope of MUTP, as follows:

• It is proposed to add in the project the installation of an efficiency monitoring system (EMS) in all buses. It consists in procurement of additional bus equipment intended to improve the efficiency of the fleet of BEST.

• It is proposed to add in the project the procurement of a management information system (MIS) for the operation of BEST transport department.

Implementation period 27. It is proposed to extend the implementation period of the loan and credit to December 31, 2009 for all components. Most of the activities are expected to be

14

completed by end of December 2009 except for SCLR and the rail component that are expected to be completed during the year 2010. The two road contracts, executed by MMRDA/MSRDC, have experienced very slow disbursement, but reasonably realistic schedules have been prepared and most of the impediments (land acquisition, shops and residences, utilities) have been removed. Other road civil work activities that faced difficulties because of problems relating to implementation for land acquisition and resettlement activities or interagency coordination (ROBs and SATISs and several PGSS) will not be any more part of the project. On August 28, 2008, DEA requested an extension of the closing date until December 2010 for the rail component (this request is presented in Annex 3). However, in view of elements of uncertainty regarding the completion date of this component as well as SCLR, it is recommended that consideration for a further extension beyond the one proposed be taken only after the remaining main impediments be eliminated. Revised cost of the project 28. At the time of appraisal the exchange rate was of USD 1 for INR 48. At the end of December 2007, when the restructuring was prepared, the exchange rate was of USD 1 for INR 39.46. This revised exchange rate has been applied to estimated expenditures yet to occur until completion of the project. In addition the counterpart cost of the project has increased mainly due to an increase of the local manufacturing cost of the EMUs. As a result and taking into account the revised scope resulting from the restructuring, the total project cost reaches USD 1,123 million, with USD 568 million as counter part fund and USD 555 million from IBRD and IDA combined. This revised cost includes a price contingency of USD 36 million as provision against currency fluctuation.

29. Impact on Project Development Objective and Key Performance Indicators. The Project Development Objective will not be affected by the proposed restructuring, but there will be an impact on key performance indicators. The impact in traffic management capacity building will be reduced while the capacity building impact in resettlement management will increase with the restructuring. The reduction of the number of pedestrian subways and traffic management schemes included in the project will reduce the impact of the project on pedestrian safety and traffic fluidity. The reduced quantity of track addition will not reduce the level of rail service provided to users and will not affect the outcome indicators. A detailed table listing the key project outcome indicators and showing how restructuring might impact these is given in Annex 4. 30. The project will not support road safety improvement through financial assistance to the Police; however, support for road safety activities will be extended through the recurrent implementation support from the Bank. Through such support, MMRDA has undertaken a road safety investigation of both Project roads (JVLR and SCLR) and has started to implement the remedial action plan for road safety along JVLR while design audit of the other road, SCLR, is in process.

6 The exchange rate USD against INR varies rapidly and was of USD 1 for INR 42.4 at the date of August 12. This recent variation increases by approximately USD 24 million the price contingency provision included in the cost estimate.

15

D. ANALYSIS Additional justification for the new activities 31. The additional EMS to be installed on BEST buses will allow monitoring in real time the fuel efficiency of each bus and will facilitate improvement of its efficiency through better driver performance or other actions. The expected benefits will be in the form of better fuel efficiency which will translate into savings of about 11% of fuel and operating material cost and the investment (about US$ 2.5million) will have a pay back period of 15 months from the date of introduction of the system. 32. The installation of the MIS in BEST derives from recommendations given in the BEST Business Plan prepared as part of the project. Benefits of the system will mainly consist in allowing the depot manager to quickly access required information such as bus and staff schedules, inventory levels, etc. for better decision making. The system will also improve corporate governance and transparency. Additional benefits will be in the form of manpower restructuring as the system will make more than 250 jobs redundant and will thus reduce operational expenditure and overheads in terms of non-operational staff. The investment cost is estimated at INR 330 million. Both these activities will be funded by BEST with its own resources. Impact of deleted activities on economic evaluation 33. Deleted investments concern only traffic management activities and their economic benefits were not differentiated from those of other road component activities in the economic evaluation carried out at the time of project appraisal. At that time, the economic rate of return of the road component of the project was very high estimated at 39.75%. It was estimated that the NPV, discounted at 12 percent, would become zero if the project costs increase by 403 percent, or if the benefits decrease by 72%.As deleted activities from the road component represented 40% of the cost of the road infrastructure component at the time of PAD, the economic utility of the project remain clearly positive. Safeguards issues: resettlement, environment, etc. 34. In the case of Road Over Bridges, under the Road Component, the resettlement implementation plans were prepared and the implementation has been partly completed with some 711 project affected households (PAH) out of 1,156 (62%) already resettled. For them the resettlement and rehabilitation process will be completed according to MUTP procedures. For the people yet to be resettled, a specific procedure to be adopted by MMRDA has been prepared and is presented in Annex 5. There are no environmental issues associated with the restructuring proposal. Funds flow for the Part A of the project 35. The funds flow for the rail component, Part A of the project, follows the same process whether Bank funds come from the proceeds of the IBRD Loan or of the IDA Credit. To reflect the cost sharing arrangement for rail component between the Indian Railways (IR) and the Government of Maharashtra (GoM), 50 percent of the funding for the rail component will be provided for in the budget of Indian Railways and 50 percent in the budget of GoM. The IR funds (including for the counterpart share of the Bank funded portion of the project as well as for non-Bank Funded (NBF) subcomponents) will be passed on to the Central Railways through a budget order and then from the Central

16

Railways to MRVC on a quarterly basis through a bank transaction effecting transfer of the allocation. MRVC will pass on a part of these funds to CR, WR and RDSO, for implementation of some specific NBF project subcomponents. The GoM funds (including counterpart share) will be routed to MRVC through MMRDA. Preparedness for the proposed activities 36. The new activities proposed for enhancing efficiency of bus operations will be implemented by BEST which has demonstrated its capacity to do so and has satisfactorily implemented its procurement activity under MUTP. The fuel efficiency goods procurement is of similar nature but of much lower scale than the procurement of buses completed during the early phase of MUTP implementation. For the implementation of the Management Information System, BEST has set up a core working group under the responsibility of an Additional General Manager. The core working group is led by specialists from the information technology department (EDP) and includes representatives of the main user departments. The new activity is expected to be implemented before December 2009. 37. On financial management aspects, the reallocated funds will flow to MRVC to finance contractual expenditures. In MRVC, the funds will be used to finance the variation in existing contracts due to devaluation of the US dollar in addition to the price escalation. In addition to well established operational control procedures, there are internal audits in place at both organizations in addition to statutory audits. MRVC has a functional Audit Committee with independent Directors. The audit reports of MRVC have been received and are unqualified. The FM assessment conducted during the restructuring mission found that the arrangements in place are satisfactory to account for the additional funds that will flow through to these agencies. Covenants adjustments 38. The Borrower requested that paragraph 12 of Schedule 2 of the Maharahstra Project Agreement be revised to allow the use of transit tenements procured as part of MUTP, as temporary housing for Project Affected Households of future Maharashtra development projects prior to their resettlement in permanent tenements. This request would not apply to the tenements that have been built in a zone covered by the Coastal Zone (CRZ) regulation, as they have since been dismantled. This request is acceptable to the Bank. 39. It is proposed to amend the legal agreements to allow the use of IDA resources for activities under Part A, Rail Transport Component. E. BENEFITS AND RISKS Benefits 40. The main benefit of the restructuring and extension is an increased focus on key activities of the project that have a better likelihood of successful completion. Additional benefits come in the form of improved quality of resettlement and rehabilitation. Risks 41. The main risk consists in a possible lack of pro-activity by implementing agencies in the future to address and solve managerial difficulties that could emerge. During the

17

past period of project implementation, significant improvements have occurred in project management capacity of MMRDA and MRVC. In particular key management positions have been created for resettlement, and detailed project schedules have been prepared and are updated periodically. The residual risk will be mitigated by an active engagement with the implementing agencies as part of project supervision. 42. Financial management risk is substantial. Limited disbursements remain on the R&R component of the project and MMRDA’s accounting capacity is limited. This risk will be mitigated by MMRDA instituting internal controls on R&R payments associated with MUTP and increasing its accounting capacity. 43. Lessons from the Detailed Implementation Review of the Health Sector in India (DIR) have been carefully reviewed and it was found that current practices followed by the borrower for the implementation of the project, and by the Bank team for its supervision, are in line of these lessons and that there is no need for additional action at this stage. Detailed explanation related to this statement is presented in Annex 7.

18

ANNEX 1: STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN AS ON JUNE 30, 2008

No. Action Key Action points Current Status

1. Strengthening R&R Unit with additional staff

• Prepare an Organogram showing various position in R&R cell of PMU in MMRDA

• Identify the vacant positions in the Organ gram and take steps to fill the positions

Target date: 30 April 2006

• Updated Organogram showing names of officers in position has been prepared

• Deputy Registrar and 5 Community Development Assistants are appointed during middle of December, 2006

• Social Development Scientist appointed • A Chief Officer for post-R&R activities

appointed; • A Chief Engineer with a team of

engineer specially assigned MUTP related works including repair work and estate management in RR colonies

• Two additional executive engineers appointed for completing pending civil works related repairs and for improving estate management at R&R colonies

• Two new Community Development Associates appointed to oversee post resettlement support activities beyond the completion of the Post R&R support program by the professional consultant.

This Action is completed 2. Prepare a

Training Program for enhancing skills among MMRDA, MSRDC, MRVC and Railway staff, sub-contractors and PMCs.

• Carry out capacity building needs assessment on R&R and other project related issues

• Propose a training plan for R&R staff and other associated with R&R implementation

Target date: 31 may 2006

• A training schedule has been prepared for 2006 and implemented to some extent

• A training schedule for 2007 was prepared

This Action is completed

3. Streamline roles and responsibilities of staff involved with Resettlement and Environment implementation

• Describe roles and responsibilities for each position with reporting arrangements


• The roles and responsibilities of key positions are described in Implementation Manual (Page 19-25)


4. Substantial completion of training program

• Carry out training program as proposed in Sl. No.2

• Send status report on the training program

Target date: 31 August 2006

• A training schedule to conduct six training program during September to December 2006 was prepared and implemented partially

• Two training courses on RDBMS held • One orientation course held on Sep 5,

2005 • Training schedule for 2007, inclusive of

remaining training program carried forward from 2006 has been prepared

19

No. Action Key Action points Current Status • A training program on Documentation

and Reporting was organized on June, 27, 2007 (Report prepared).

• A training program on Post R&R Issues was organized on August 03, 2007.

• A workshop on Management of Co-operative Housing Societies held on September 07 and 08 2007.

• Training on Post Resettlement Issues was organized on 27th November 2007

• Two half-day workshops on management of co-operative society at Kanjur Marg and Asgaonkar site held on 31st August and 2nd January 2008.

• The remaining training programs on the management of co-operative societies was conducted by the post resettlement consultant

• 35 Training programs were conducted during 2007-2008 as a part of post resettlement support action plan.

This Action is completed. 5. Appoint IMP

chairman and re-define their role and scope of TOR

• Appoint new IMP Chairman • Propose changes in the TOR

if required Target date: 30 April 2006

• The new IMP Chairman was appointed in March-06

(GoM’s GR dated March 18, 2006) This Action is completed

6. Strengthen Grievance Redress Committees to have more delegated administrative powers

• Streamline the procedures for grievances redress committees

• Define the roles of Committees

• Extend secretarial assistance to Committees


• The streamlined procedures of GRC are defined in IM (Chapter 29)

• The Committees are reconstituted with independent one member; and the NGO and MMRDA staff are made respondents (Page 27 of IM)

• Dedicated secretarial assistance for electronic documentation by GRCs has been extended

• Updated GRC status reports provided; This Action is completed

7. Revise & amend Implementation Manual to cover R&R and Environmental procedures

• Update the manual incorporating the Bank's comments


• Implementation Manual has been updated


8. Finalize Implementation Manual

• Obtain Bank’s endorsement for final version

• Disclose the manual in Web site


• Implementation Manual disclosed on the website in June 2006

• Procedure for resettlement of commercial PAPs in the event of break down in negotiations disclosed on MMRDA website and at PICs shall be incorporated in IM


20

No. Action Key Action points Current Status

9. Operationalize Resettlement Implementation Manual

In progress Target date: 30 June 2006

• The procedure defined in the Implementation Manual is being followed

This Action is completed. 10. Data Base

Management system in operation using Oracle software for tracking and retrieval of PAH data

• Install Oracle software in MMRDA

• Upgrade LAN and install Internet lease line for smooth operation of the DBMS

• Identify dedicated staff for operating DBMS

• Complete refining of DBMS after test run

• Complete entry of all relevant R&R data

• Complete integration process through training


• Oracle software installed; Data Base Manager appointed; LAN in operation

• The Database Management System is still being refined; at present, it can generate R&R related reports on PAHs, affected structures; allotments, grievance redress, cooperative housing Society,

• MMRDA continues to utilize the existing excel/ visual basic database.

This Action is substantially completed

11 Complete Impact Assessment Studies for Anik, Majas, Mankhurd; put in place remedial measures

• Award consultancy for Impact Assessment study

• Complete the study and propose remedial measures as needed

Target date: 31 August 2006

• TISS has completed the resettlement impact assessment study for Anik, Majas and Mankhurd R&R Sites

• Bank has provided its feedback, which TISS has incorporated in the IA report;

• MMRDA has disclosed the final IA Report at the PIC;

• MMRDA has prepared and is implementing a remedial Action Plan to address key issues raised in the Draft TISS-IA Report.

This Action is substantially completed. 12. Issue identity

cards to all PAHs who are already moved in and ensure identity cards are issued for others prior to issue of allotment letters (Keep copies in MMRDA)

• Complete issue of ID cards to PAHs who are already moved

• Prepare R&R site-wise status report on issue of ID cards to PAHs already resettled

• Ensure issue of ID Cards for others prior to shifting

• Indicate progress in monthly R&R progress report


• The issuance of identity cards is in progress;

• 16,897 ID Cards have been issued to the resettled PAPs so far


13. Submit Monthly Progress Report to Bank on Resettlement and Environment Implementation Status including Action Plan

• Prepare and submit R&R Progress Report in this format before 10th of every calendar month

Target date: by 10 of every month

• The progress report is being submitted regularly

This is a continuous process.

14. Issue ID cards as per RIP for SCLR

• Issue of identity cards to all shopkeepers

• Issueof identity cards to all

• ID Cards issued to all resettled SCLR commercial and residential PAHs;

• ID cards to the remaining PAPs shall be

21

No. Action Key Action points Current Status employees prior to shifting

Target date: 30 April 2006 issued during allotments

Action substantially completed 15. Finalize

construction cost for R&R sites offered as alternatives

• Finalize site-wise cost for purchase of additional eligible space by shopkeepers

• Disclose the costs Target date: 30 April 2006

• Costs for MUTP sites finalized and shared with the Bank

• MMRDA Executive Committee on November 28, 2007 has decided that the cost of extra space offered to PAPs at MUIP sites will be at ready reckoner rates.

This Action is completed 16. Obtain MCGM

concurrence for retention of partially affected structures

• Hold discussions with MCGM and evolve a mechanism for processing and approving eligible requests for retention of partially affected structures

• Disclose application procedure at PICs/website


• Discussion held with MCGM for ensuring retention of partially affected structures

• A note explaining the procedure for facilitating retention of partially affected structures has been disclosed on MMRDA website

• Kurar Pattern circular kept at PIC for information of PAPs.

• Individual notices served to PAPs This Action is completed

17. GoM decision/ notification on capitalization of title

• Finalize criteria for permitting capitalization of allotted shop

• Obtain GoM’s decision specifying mechanism/ procedure for capitalization of title

Target date: 31 May 2006

• Proposal has been submitted to GoM • Further progress on the issue has been

slow as PAPs have so far not come forward to exercise this option.

Action initiated

18. Complete negotiations with SCLR (225sq.ft.+ / special needs) shopkeepers on their relocation options

• Complete categorization of shopkeeper’s category wise indicating options most suitable for them and obtain Bank’s concurrence

• Hold negotiations in batches for resettlement of shopkeepers

• Notify about suitable options in case of non-cooperation and issue allotment notice

• Prepare monthly status on progress made and include in monthly progress report

Target Date: 30 April 2006

• Completed negotiations with 40 shopkeepers for allotment of shops at Motilal Nehru Complex, who have shifted resettled

• Held discussions with USOA on June 06, 2006; informed USOA that in-situ resettlement shall not be possible due to Mithi River Development Project-II and other land uses

• Held negotiation with 42 Commercial PAPs from Santa Jog Marg; 28 voluntarily shifted;

• R&R process to follow in the event of break down in negotiations, proposed to be included in Implementation Manual, approved by Bank

• Notices to 226 PAPs having area more than 225 Sq. ft. served in Nov’06.

• One to one negotiations held with 39 PAPs in January 2007

• Categorization of shops having area above 225 Sq. ft. approved by IMP;.

• A fresh series of consultations held with USOA/KNWA for considering in-situ resettlement; Draft MoU for the scheme agreed upon;

22

No. Action Key Action points Current Status • USOA/KNWA failed to sign MoU; IMP

directed MMRDA to follow approved procedure for their resettlement

• USOA/KNWA requested IMP/ MMRDA to reconsider decision; MMRDA agreed to sign MoU if the shopkeepers cleared site for first phase of civil work by June 1, 2007; KNWA cleared affected portions of 52 shops;

• MoU signed with KNWA in August’07 • USOA split up into two groups; • 24 USOA break away members keen on

in situ scheme have cleared affected portion of their shops; MMRDA willing to sign individual MoUs with these PAPs;

• The other group (80 shopkeepers) of USOA has negotiated with MMRDA for their resettlement in a new shopping complex at MN Nagar, for which MoU is expected to be signed in near future.

• 28 PAPs recently offered to accept tenements at MN Nagar BKC

This Action is partly completed 19. Complete

resettlement of all affected shopkeepers of SCLR. (smaller shops & 225sq.ft.+/special needs)

• Indicate the progress made in the monthly progress report


• Categorization and mapping of shops having area more than 225 sq. ft. approved by IMP in its meeting dated December 1, 2006

• There are 552 affected shopkeepers (this number may come down in view of some PAPs joining in-situ scheme and change in alignment) including 32 residential cum commercial along SCLR. Out of these 271 including 27 commercial cum residential PAPs are resettled so far. This includes 23 PAPs relocated from Rahul Nagar in Dec 2007

• Notices served to 89 PAPs having area less than 225 sq. ft.

• One to one negotiations with the PAPs held on January 4-5, 2007, which 39 PAPs attended;

• MMRDA has carried out additional BSES for SCLR; expects to complete resettlement by December 2008.

This Action is partly completed 20. Enumerate all

employees of affected shops; Issue ID cards as per RIP Thane-Kurla, SCLR and JVLR

• Issue identity cards to all affected shopkeepers

• Issue identity cards to all affected employees prior to shifting

Target date: 31 July 2006

• ID cards issued to 60 employees who were available for survey;

• Some employees have left their job;

Action substantially completed.

21. Complete resettlement

• Complete negotiations with shopkeepers for other sub-

• Negotiations held with RoB Jogeshwari (North and South) and JVLR- II

23

No. Action Key Action points Current Status negotiations with all affected shopkeepers of remaining sub-projects

projects Target date: 31 August 2006

• All outstanding issues for JVLR resolved amicably;

• ROBs and SATIS sub-projects have been removed from MUTP;

• MMRDA will resettle PAPs affected by ROBs and SATIS on its own, applying a procedure that it has proposed and will disclose prior to the actual relocation of concerned PAPs.

This Action is completed.

22. Complete resettlement of affected shopkeepers of other sub-projects

• Separate those below 225 sq. ft. and offer choices as per Action Plan

• Complete issue of allotment letters based on negotiations

Target date: 31 October 2006

• 1,363 commercial PAPs have been resettled;

• Resettlement of JVLR-II commercial PAPs has been completed except a very few involving court litigation;

• Resettlement of shopkeepers affected by other projects will be completed as explained in para 21 above.


23. Strengthen PIC at MMRDA and Field locations

• Establish a separate PIC at MMRDA

• Strengthen PIC at other locations

Target date: 31 March 2006

• A PIC established on the 1stt floor of MMRDA in May 2006 is operating.

• MMRDA has closed PICs at project sites in view of their under utilization and has converted PICs at RR sites into community coordination offices, which will continue to provide site specific information to resettled PAPs.

This Action is completed 24. Disclosure of all

beneficiary lists on MMRDA’s website of all households shifted to resettlement sites until December 2006

• Disclose all PAPs shifted prior to December 2006 in MMRDA’s website


• List of over 17,000 PAHs permanently resettled has been disclosed on MMRDA web site


25. Distribute brochure on grievance redress to all PAPs

Target date: 31 March 2006 • Brochures on GRC are attached to allotment letters, have been kept at PIC.


26. Execute an agreement with professional agency /liaison architects for support to implement post resettlement activities

• Sign an agreement with the selected agency for post resettlement activities


• M/s TCS was appointed as the post resettlement consultant in June 2007.

• It prepared and implemented a post R&R Action Plan at the R&R sites; and left after submitting an Exit Strategy;

• MMRDA has agreed on a set of indicators for exit from individual buildings and resettlement sites

24

No. Action Key Action points Current Status This Action is completed

27. Assess in consultation with people building-wise, actions needed for management of co-operative societies and put in place an action plan

• Complete assessment by professional agency in consultation with PAPs

• Prepare an action plan based on the feedback from PAPs.

Target date: 30 June 2006

• TCS prepared a Self Management Support Action Plan for R&R sites based on a need assessment study

• The action plan has been implemented by TCS.

This Action is completed.

28. Implement an action plan for strengthening management of co-operative societies

• Specific action plan for CHS to be prepared by professional agency.

• Capacity building strategy and CHS management handbook to be shared after preparation;

• Implementation by professional agency in collaboration with MMRDA

Target date: 30 June 2006

• MMRDA-TCS have implemented the Action Plan for promoting and strengthening self management PAP societies in R&R sites;

• TCS-MMRDA developed Capacity Building modules and IEC materials

• Conducted 42 training programs in which 140 societies participated;

• Organized opportunities fair for resettled youth in collaboration with prospective employers;

• MMRDA provided work sheds to 15 poor PAHs in Anik;

• 10,007 resettled women are engaged in micro credit activities

• MMRDA has recruited 2 trained field staff of TCS after the latter having completed its task exited in June 2008.

• MMRDA will complete support activities prior to program exit

• Key Indicators for MMRDA’s exit from resettlement buildings and sites have been broadly agreed upon.

The Action is completed.

29. Submit proposal for Bank’s consideration for construction of social services at various resettlement sites

• Undertake assessment of need for establishing schools, dispensaries, recreation spaces, parks, etc. at each resettlement site

• Prepare site-wise proposals and submit for Bank financing


• MMRDA is developing social services at the resettlement sites on its own and has not sought any bank financing for this activity so far.

30. Complete substantial construction of social services at resettlement sites

• Award contracts on receiving Bank’s clearance to the proposals


• MMRDA has given 48 tenements to MCGM to run schools at Mankhurd and Anik after converting these tenements into classrooms;

• MCGM has started running the schools; • Construction of a permanent school

building at Mankhurd is in progress. • The land required for construction

school buildings at Kokari Agar (Wadala) and Village Anik is identified

25

No. Action Key Action points Current Status • MMRDA has transferred 6 tenements to

MCGM for establishing a dispensary at Anik.

• Action is partly completed. 31. Completion of

registration of about 80 societies at Anik, Majas, Mankhurd, Kanjur Marg

• Assist PAPs in completing registration papers in association with NGOs and submit proposal to Registrar of Societies

• Follow-up for competition of registration


• 150 CHS fully registered; • 16 proposals are under consideration; This Action is completed.

32. Transfer of maintenance funds and interest to 48 initial cooperative societies

• Transfer funds to 48 cooperative societies


• Transfer of interest on maintenance funds to 48 societies updated;

• The transfer of maintenance deposit fund to the societies registered by the SRA is in progress; SRA has transferred INR 7.84 Cr (USD 1.96 million) as a principle amount, to be disbursed to societies;

• MMRDA has opened joint (fixed deposit) savings bank accounts using the maintenance fund with 52 societies, from where the concerned societies will directly receive interest.


33. Transfer of maintenance funds and interest to 80 societies at Anik, Majas, Mankhurd and Kanjur Marg

• Transfer funds to 80 co-operative societies


• The transfer process has been initiated; • MMRDA has opened joint savings bank

accounts using the maintenance fund received from SRA with 4 more housing societies than the 48 initially registered societies.

Action initiated

34. Transfer of CRF to 80 societies at Anik, Majas, Mankhurd and Kanjur Marg

• Transfer funds to 80 co-operative societies

Target date: 30 September 2006

• In view of some legal issues, change in guidelines for utilization of CRF, and a new procedure for transfer of funds were agreed by Bank and MMRDA;

• CRF has been agreed to be renamed as Community Maintenance Fund (CMF).

• MMRDA has disbursed CMF to 99 registered societies as per the procedure.

This Action is Completed. 35. Transfer of

common facilities in the name of societies to initial 48 societies

• Transfer all common facilities to all 48 societies (Balwadi, Welfare centre and Society office room)


• Common facilities transferred to all 48 societies registered earlier


36. Transfer of common facilities to 80 societies at Anik, Majas, Mankhurd

• Transfer all common facilities to all another 80 societies (Balwadi, Welfare centre and Society office room)

• Common facilities transferred to 163 name registered societies

• The remaining societies will receive common facilities with progress in registration process

26

No. Action Key Action points Current Status and Kanjur Marg Target date: 31 May 2006 This Action is completed

37. Transfer of conveyance deed in favor of 48 cooperative societies

• Initiate process for transferring the title

• Complete registration of title in favor of societies

Target date: 31 December 2006

• As per SRA Rules 11.4 of DCR 33/10 Appendix-IV, transfer of land can be leased rent.

Action initiated

38. Transfer of conveyance deed in favor of 80 cooperative societies in phase-II at Anik, Majas, Mankhurd and Kanjur Marg

• Initiate process for transferring the title

• Complete registration of title in favor of societies

Target date: 31 December 2007

• Process has been initiated.

Action initiated

39. Provide support to administer CRFs among PAPs to at least 1,000 beneficiaries

• Professional agency will provide training to CHSs for managing the CRF

Target date: 31 October 2006

• Post Resettlement Consultant has completed training for PAP cooperative societies, which also focused on management of CMF.

• New guidelines for management of, CMF have been disseminated to the recipients.

This Action is Completed. 40. Distribute

brochure on Do’s and Don’ts of maintenance of houses to PAHs already moved in to resettlement colonies and issue in future at the time of allotment

• Prepare a brochure on maintenance aspects

• Distribute to PAPs and place in PICs


• Brochures in Marathi and English have been printed and placed in PICs and available for distribution


41. Issue Building Maintenance Manuals to registered cooperative societies

• Ensure that developer/contractor prepares site/building wise maintenance manual

• Manuals should be issued to each cooperative society

Target date: continuing

• Building Manuals are prepared • Manuals are issued to all societies.

This Action is substantially completed.

42. Submit pending RIPs for Bank’s review and clearance: SCLR (updated), Vikhroli RoB and SATIS

• SCLR: Submit RIP and obtain Bank’s approval

• Vikhroli RoB: o Hold public consultations

for identifying R&R sites o Update BSES and finalize

RIP o Submit for Bank’s review

prior to issue of bid documents

• SATIS: Finalize RIP and submit for Bank’s review prior to issue of bid documents

• Updated RIP for SCLR has been approved by Bank and its implementation is in progress

• SATIS removed from MUTP; • Supplementary BSES for Sable Nagar,

Bharti Nagar received • Supplementary BSES for additional

impact due to pylon, drain diversion at , Gazi Nagar, Budddha Colony, and Rahul Nagar has been disclosed;

• Revised BSES for Vikhroli RoB prepared. forwarded to Bank

• RIP for Vikhroli RoB submitted; This Action is completed

27

No. Action Key Action points Current Status Target date: 30 April 2006

43. Submit to Bank updated baseline socio-economic information for JVLR-phase-I and II, Jogeshwari RoBs (South and North)

• Complete updating of key socio-economic data

• Submit updated report on baseline values for Bank’s information


• Updated BSES Volume I & II for JVLR-I&III and JVLR II submitted to the Bank

• Updating of baseline data for Jogeshwari RoBs (South and North) is completed.


44. Submit Action Plan for relocation of affected community assets in road projects

• Enumerate sub-project wise list of affected community assets

• Prepare a time frame for their relocation


• Meeting held with stakeholders to discuss relocation of religious structures from SCLR and JVLR on August 24, 2006

• Action Plan for relocation of community structures has been shared with the Bank

Action is completed 45. Submit a note on

land acquisition requirements for various sub-projects for monitoring its progress

• Prepare a statement on land acquisition requirement sub project-wise indicating section, land owner, quantity, LA process status, GAD map

• Set time frame keeping in mind civil works timetable


• Staff has been appointed to monitor and coordinate LA process

• A status report on LA requirements for SCLR and JVLR has been prepared and shared with Bank.

Action is completed.

46 Seek MCGM’s assurance to include the R&R areas for solid waste management

• Discuss with MCGM for extending solid waste management services to R&R sites

• Hand over sites to MCGM for solid waste management purpose

Target date: continuous

• Discussions held with Chief Engineer, Solid Waste Department of MCGM. Letter issued to concerned Chief Engineer for strengthening effective solid waste management in R & R sites

• Work order was issued by MMRDA for provision of garbage bins at all R&R sites in December 2007;

• A total 481 garbage bins placed in 13 resettlement sites;

• MCGM requested to prepare transport plan for garbage disposal

• List of R&R sites with solid waste management details provided to MCGM

• MCGM has responded to request and all R&R sites have been included in the transport plan.

• Discussion in advanced stage for handing over R&R sites to MCGM.

This Action is partly completed 47. Seek MCGM’s

assurance to regularly inspect and monitor waste water disposal and area sanitation

• Discuss with MCGM for extending waste water disposal services to R&R sites

• Hand over sites to MCGM for waste water management purpose


• Concerned ward officers have been intimated; Commitment letter has already been received

• Instruction given to concerned Chief Engineer, Waste Water Department for regular inspection and monitoring in R & R sites.

• MMRDA has written to MCGM in a

28

No. Action Key Action points Current Status letter of December 17, 2007 and February 5, 2008 regarding maintenance of R&R Colonies

• As per MCGM demand, MMRDA has paid 7 million rupees to MCGM for providing sewerage connectivity to Kokari Agar R&R Colony.

• MMRDA has discussed the issue with Deputy Commissioners of MCGM on April 8, 2008.

This Action is partly completed

48. Seek MCGM’s assurance for organization of storm water drains management

• Discuss with MCGM for maintaining storm water drains at to R&R sites

• Hand over sites to MCGM for storm water drains management


• Letter issued to concerned Chief Engineer Storm Water department for regular inspection and monitoring in R&R sites.

• Metropolitan Commissioner MMRDA has informed to Commissioner MCGM vide DO letter dated 17th December 2007 and 5th February 2008 regarding maintenance of R&R Colonies

• This issue has been discussed in meeting convened by MMRDA with all the Deputy Municipal Commissioners of MCGM on April 8, 2008.

This Action is partly completed 49. Prepare a plan

for community space management and tree plantation

• Hold discussion with MCGM and agree for tree plantation program in R&R sites


• Environmental Management Consultant appointed; Tree plantation in open spaces and along the layout roads will be done and handed over to the societies / federation of societies for management

• Accordingly, EMCB Consultants have prepared a Environment, Health and Hygiene (EHH) Action Plan for SEVEN R&R Sites along with Kanjur Marg (Hariyali site) as a Pilot Project for implementation.

• The Community Space Management Plan and Tree Plantation Plan have been prepared for the R&R Sites as a part of EHH Action Plan. These Action Plans were discussed with concerned stakeholders for implementation.

• The Tree Plantation Activity is possible in Kanjur Marg and Mankhurd R&R Sites. The Tree Plantation is being implemented by MMRDA through concerned Contractors.

• EMCB Consultants has prepared EHH Action Plans for all MUTP R&R sites

This Action is in progress.

50. Introduce advance locality management systems and

• Hold discussion with MCGM to extend their Advance Locality Management systems to R&R sites

• Community awareness building on health and sanitation with help of NGOs, EMCB consultants and MCGM started at Kanjur Marg East (Pilot

29

No. Action Key Action points Current Status build community awareness about health and sanitation

systems to R&R sites Target date: continuous

started at Kanjur Marg East (Pilot Project) with on Dec 19, 2007

• Similar capacity building and training program is being organized in Anik I & II sites from 27th Jan’08.

• EMCB Consultants will cover all other R&R sites of MUTP during the training program. ALM Officer of MCGM is part of the Capacity Building faculty organized by EMCB Consultants

• The concept of ALM as a community initiative is being explained to the Women members and PAP Society/ Federation members. EMCB Consultants are encouraging the PAPs to explore the ALM concept.

• Community awareness about Environment, Health and Sanitation to the office bearers and PAPs at 4(Four) R&R Sites have been completed since December 2007 by EMCB Consultant. Currently 3 more sites being taken up and is expected to complete by September 2008

• Along the lines of ALM concept, at Kanjur Marg Pilot site, for daily upkeep and maintenance of health and hygiene, CBO services are being commissioned. A MOU between CBO and Federation society is in final stages of negotiation. This experiment will put n sustainable model at the R & R site ensuring clean environment. The CBO services that covers various hygiene and sanitary services including solid waste and dry waste segregation is proposed to be funded by PAPs themselves at about Rs 30 per household per month

This Action is in progress.

30

ANNEX 2: BORROWER’S REQUEST FOR RESTRUCTURING AND EXTENSION OF PROJECT PERIOD, DEA LETTER DATED MARCH 31 ST. 2008

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

ANNEX 3: BORROWER’S REQUEST FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF PROJECT PERIOD FOR RAIL COMPONENT, DEA LETTER DATED AUGUST 28, 2008

55

56

57

ANNEX 4: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Table 1: Changes in Key Performance Indicators: This table presents only the lines where changes have occurred compared to the PAD and are presented as part of the restructuring

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

BASELINE END PROJECT

Outcome/Impact Indicators

As per PAD/ revised

Original Target

Revised Target

Agency Monitoring

1 Meet User Demands 1.2 ORIGINAL:

PGSS: Nbr of accidents per year (Nbr of fatalities) -DELETED

DELETED MCGM

2 System Efficiency ORIGINAL

100 pcu hours/hour

2.5 To reduce delays at ATC controlled junctions

REVISED 617 PCU hrs/

per hour (phase I: 53

nodes) 2900 PCU hrs

per hour (phase II: 625

nodes)

Reduction of PCU

Hours/per hour by 25%

Reduction of PCU Hours/per hour by

10%

MCGM/Traffic Police

3 Sustainability 4 Effective Institutions

4.1 To increase the technical capacity of the Traffic Management Unit (TMU) in MCGM

No TMU Fully functional TMU

REVISED: Training completed

MCGM

4.2 ORIGINAL: To increase the technical capacity of transport planning, road maintenance, road safety and vehicle emissions control units so that new procedures to develop and implement the programmes for which they are responsible are in place.

Limited capacity

New procedures in place, to develop and implement programs

Procedures in place for transportation planning and road safety. Road maintenance study completed and recommendations accepted

MMRDA

MCGM

58



Outcome/Impact Indicators

As per PAD/ revised

Original Target

Revised Target

Agency Monitoring

REVISED: To increase the technical capacity of transport planning, road maintenance and road safety so that new procedures to develop and implement the programmes for which they are responsible are in place.

4.4 NEW: To develop capacity for management of resettlement implementation

Project R&R Unit created with few staff in MMRDA

Reasonably well functional R&R division in MMRDA with procedures in place. Various implementation procedures are adopted for non-MUTP projects

MMRDA

4.5 NEW: To strengthen capacity for environmental management in urban infrastructure projects

No reliable reports

Staffed trained in environmental management with procedures in place

MMRDA, MRVC, MSRDC

59

Table 2: Revised Table Key Performance Indicators: This table presents each key performance indicator with its updated value as part of the restructuring where needed.



Outcome/Impact Indicators As per PAD/ revised

Target

Agency Monitoring

1 Meet User Demands 1.1 To reduce peak hour overcrowding,

average loads in trains reduced 4500 3600 MRVC

1.2 To reduce incidence and severity of pedestrian road traffic accidents in areas where facilities are proposed

100% 90% MCGM

JVLR: Nbr of accidents per year (Nbr of fatalities) compare to average traffic flow at peak hour

1.51% (0.34%) 1.36% (0.31%) MCGM

2 System Efficiency 2.1 To increase peak hour average

frequency for train services 13 16 MRVC

2.1.1 PHPD on CR Through Line 13.2 16 MRVC

2.1.2 PHPD on CR Local Line 12.4 15 MRVC 2.1.3 PHPD on WR Through Line 12.4 17 MRVC

2.1.4 PHPD on WR Local Line 12.4 17 MRVC

2.1.5 PHPD on Harbor Line 12.4 15 MRVC

2.2 To increase train availability at peak 91% 94% MRVC

2.3 To reduce journey times by road on JVLR (from WEH to EEH)

30 Minutes 24 Minutes MSRDC

2.4 To reduce journey times by road on SCLR (from WEH & EEH)

20 Minutes 16 Minutes MSRDC

2.5 To reduce delays at ATC controlled junctions

617 PCU hrs/ per hour (phase I: 53

nodes) 2900 PCU hrs per

hour (phase II: 625 nodes)

10% PCU Hours/per hourMCGM/Traffic Police

3 Sustainability 3.1 To reduce working ratio

(costs/incomes) of rail services 0.88 0.85 MRVC

3.2 To increase cost recovery (income/costs) of bus services

<0.9 >1 BEST

3.3 To increase % age of PAH living in houses of at least 225 square feet

9% 100% MMRDA

3.4 To increase % age of PAH having access to individual tap water and toilets

1% 100% MMRDA

4 Effective Institutions

60



Outcome/Impact Indicators As per PAD/ revised

Target

Agency Monitoring

4.1 To increase the technical capacity of the Traffic Management Unit (TMU) in MCGM

No TMU Training completed MCGM

4.2

To increase the technical capacity of transport planning, road maintenance and road safety so that new procedures to develop and implement the programs for which they are responsible are in place.

Limited capacity Procedures in place for transportation planning and road safety. Road maintenance study completed and recommendations accepted

MMRDA

MCGM

4.3 To strengthen the ambient air quality monitoring and reporting system

No reliable reports

Plan implemented as per study recommendations

MMRDA and MPCB

4.4 To develop capacity for management of resettlement implementation

Project R&R Unit created with few staff in MMRDA

Reasonably well functional R&R division in MMRDA with procedures in place. Various implementation procedures are adopted for non-MUTP projects

MMRDA

4.5 To strengthen capacity for environmental management in urban infrastructure projects

No reliable reports

Staffed trained in environmental management with procedures in place

MMRDA, MRVC, MSRDC

61

ANNEX 5: PROCEDURE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF BALANCE OF RESETTLEMENT ACTIVITIES FOR ROAD OVER BRIDGES (ROB)

1. All PAPs resettled to date will be considered as PAPs affected by MUTP and will be extended all post resettlement assistance as available to other PAPs;.

2. Entitlements as available in Appendix-I of the R&R policy will be made available to the balance PAPs of ROBs.

3. All remaining PAPs to be resettled from three ROBs will be given the choice for site selection depending on the availability among all MUTP/MUIP sites including Bhandup market complex for people affected by Vikroli ROB.

4. A period of one month from the date of announcement in the newspapers will be given to the PAPs for choice of the site. The details of balance eligible PAPs and number of units available in all the sites will be notified in the web site prior to newspaper announcements.

5. MMRDA will share the list of eligible PAPs with the World Bank for information and it will be implemented using MMRDA procedures in place for other projects outside MUTP.

6. If PAPs approach the Bank with grievances, the Bank shall direct them to MMRDA mentioning that the applicable resettlement process is available on the MMRDA web site.

7. MMRDA will publicly disclose the resettlement process and entitlements for ROBs in at least one national and one local newspaper and invite eligible PAPs to choose the site, subject to availability, on first-come first-served basis.

8. The payment of compensation for private land and proprieties will be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Land Acquisition Act and other applicable acts.

9. All the complaints and grievances including those pending will be dealt by MMRDA using the existing grievance redress mechanism available under MUTP (This is because the eligibility list was approved by MMRDA and the MUIP grievance mechanism may not be available).

10. The relocation of affected common properties including worship places will be done in consultation with the affected people.

11. MMRDA will carry out the process of resettling the balance PAPs of ROBs independent of World Bank supervision. MMRDA shall, however, act under the guidance of the Independent Monitoring Panel appointed for MUTP.

62

ANNEX 6: COST TABLE PER CATEGORY IBRD LOAN

S.No. Category

Loan Amount Allocated

(Million US$) Revised Loan Amount

(Million US$) Difference

(Million USD)

1 Works

a Part - A - Rail 9.70 37.64 27.94 b Part - B - Road 97.26 94.02 (3.24)

2 Goods

a Part – A – Rail 284.63 276.51 (8.12) b Part - B - Road 25.72 23.38 (2.34)

3 Consultant Services

a Part - A - Rail 8.51 5.12 (3.39) b Part - B - Road 20.49 16.98 (3.51)

4 Other Services and Training

a Part - A - Rail 0.56 0.56 0.00 b Part - B - Road 0.50 0.50 0.00

5 PPF Refund 3.00 3.27 0.27

6 Fee 4.63 4.63 0.00

7 Unallocated 8 0.39 (7.61)

Total $ 463.00 $ 463.00 0.00 Notes:

1) For original loan amounts allocated, exchange rate is Rs 48 per USD 2) For revised loan amounts, exchange rate is Rs. 39.41 to the $ for only undisbursed

portion of IBRD. IDA CREDIT

S.No. Category

Credit Amount Allocated

(Million SDR)

Revised Credit Amount

(Million SDR) Difference

(Million SDR) 1 Civil Works under C1, C2 and C4

58.10 45.40 (12.70)

2 Consultant Services under C1, C2 and C4

2.40 0.90 (1.50)

3 NGO Services & Training

2.00 1.55 (0.45)

4 Goods

Part - A - Rail 0.00 14.65 14.65

Total 62.50 62.50 0.00 Note: SDR exchange rate: SDR 1 = USD 1.58

63

ANNEX 7: INCORPORATION OF LESSONS FROM THE DIR DIR Rec. No.

Issue Actions taken by TT and/or MMRDA/ MRVC/ BEST (MUTP)

Actions proposed to be taken by the TT and/or

MUTP

Project Design 1 Risk of Fraud and

corruption (F&C) F&C have been rated moderate based on: •Borrower’s previous satisfactory performance: allegations of corruption have been received before 2006, forwarded to INT and no credible evidence has been obtained to support the allegation •Company subject to the surveillance of the independent Central Vigilance Commission of India • The project receives a high level of local scrutiny from stakeholders and the media locally

• Not applicable

2 Critical implementation failures for proper operation of assets created with Bank financing are not properly identified and mitigated

MUTP has implemented the ongoing project, with substantial success in realizing the PDOs, although the rating is MS. The majority of the road infrastructure works remain to be completed. Works are designed and the construction process is being supervised by professional consultants. Bank supervision visits are carried out by qualified team members and include regular site visits. Except for road safety, the Bank team has been moderately satisfied by works quality. Lack of road safety measure in the design and during construction of the road infrastructure works has been a concern. But road safety audits have been carried out on both road infrastructure projects, remedial action plans have been drawn by the implementing agency, shared with the public and are under implementation. The quality of buses, of the new trains and of added rail services, thanks to newly built tracks, has been well received by the public. MRVC and BEST have established a good track record of paying attention to quality issues. Remaining involvement of MCGM is essentially limited to one traffic management contract.

•Coordinated efforts will be needed by the MUTP to realize the benefit of the restructuring exercise, which is expected to enhance the realization of PDOs

3 Conflict of interest in entities delegated to carry out procurement, implementation and supervision functions

•MUTP implements its projects directly. •There is an internal control framework within each of the entities involved and is subject to various internal and external audits

•Adequacy of Internal control framework will be supervised by the Task Team (TT) at periodic intervals. Internal Audit function at MMRDA is being strengthened through professional accounting support.

64

Supervision 4 Physical implementation

is not verified during supervision

•Financed activities are few and assets are large and easily verifiable •MUTP has multi-tiered monitoring systems of physical implementation: •TT has carried out on an average more than 7 missions per year, and included site visits as part of the supervision •TT has carried out external audits when needed as in the case of road safety

•FMRs capture financial and physical information of the activities for most project components.

5 Reports and data provided by Borrower are not verified by Bank when supervision is delegated to Borrower

•Supervision is carried out directly by TT which verifies information provided by MUTP •Project accounts are audited by independent private auditors with a supplemental audit by the AG (Maharashtra) which is the Supreme Audit Institution

•Not applicable

6 Aide-Memoires are opaque and lacked details as they are negotiated with borrower.

•Aide-Memoires reflect TT’s findings candidly •Action plan in Aide Memoires systematically monitored through a matrix.

7 Bank’s prior and post review do not detect F&C collusion price fixation.

•MUTP bidding is considered fairly competitive with multiple qualified bidders participating •Procurement processes in MUTP have check and balances •Due to large value, a substantial number of the contracts are subject to Prior Review by the Bank including at RPM and/or OPRC levels •A sample of contracts not subject to prior review is subject to post review •

•MUTP to engage constructively on developing processes for greater disclosure

8 Bank and Borrower do not sufficiently verify authenticity on bidder’s qualification.

•MUTP’s suppliers/ Contractors are mostly large firms with adequate track record

• MUTP to ensure that new bidders are verified adequately, when participation by such bidders is found in a bidding process.

9 Bank FMS lack contract specific data making it impossible to reconcile payments with contracts.

•MUTP’s financial system is able to provide detailed information about sub-projects, contracts/ packages and expenditures there under. •Remaining (limited) disbursements on the R&R component and limited accounting capacity at MMRDA

•Enhanced monitoring of Contract level expenditure details in supervision mission •MMRDA will institute internal controls on R&R payments associated with MUTP and augment its accounting capacity.

65

10 Response to F&C complaints are based on Borrower’s response without further verification and there is not a mechanisms to handle complaints

MUTP has a complaint management system •Bank TT relies mostly on MUTP’s information to deal with complaints

Bank TT will improve the complaint managing and recording practice by: •Seeking additional information from other sources, if necessary. •Systematic follow up of complaint responses.

11 Bank TT , Borrower and other government entities do not share key information about procurement (debarred firms)

•MUTP procurement systems are subject to scrutiny by the Central Vigilance Commission of India

•Not applicable

Project Evaluation 12 Inconsistency between

project implementation success rating and actual project implementation as the Bank relies on borrower information only

MUTP have shown substantial improvement in their controls and systems to be relied upon to achieve successful implementation of the project after restructuring is finalized.

•TT will keep similar practices on assessing and rating implementation of the project.

Decentralized Procurement

13 Pervasive F&C due to contracts which are physically dispersed and of low value.

The procurement funded by the Bank are all centrally procured by the central teams of each of the entities

Not applicable

Documents

Public Disclosure Authorized 45564 - World Bank...ATC area traffic control BEST Bombay Electricity and Suburban Transport Corporation EMS efficiency monitoring system CR Central Railway