Upload
paula-nichols
View
225
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-
mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical
modelsZhaolong Han, Jiasong Li, Manmohan Singh, Chen Wu, Chih-hao Liu,
Shang Wang, Rita Idugboe, Narendran Sudheendran, Michael D. Twa,
and Kirill V. Larin Department of Biomedical Engineering,
University of Houston
Outline
• Introduction• Methods• Results• Conclusion
Introduction• Assessing the biomechanical properties of tissues can help in
diagnostics of different diseases.
• Optical Coherence Elastography (OCE) is an emerging technique allowing noninvasive quantification of tissue biomechanical properties
• Quantification methods: shear wave equation (SWE); acoustic surface wave equation (SAE) ; lamb frequency equation (LFE); finite element method (FEM); gold standard: uniaxial compressional test.
Methods: OCE setup
OCE set up Phantom measurement
J. Li, et al, "Dynamic optical coherence tomography measurements of elastic wave propagation in tissue-mimicking phantoms and mouse cornea in vivo," J Biomed Opt 18(12), (2013).
Methods: SWE and SAE22 (1 ) gE c
32
2
2 (1 )
(0.87 1.12 ) gE c
SWE:
SAE:
g
E
c
Young's modulus
density
Possionratio
Group wave velocity
B. F. Kennedy, et al., "A Review of Optical Coherence Elastography: Fundamentals, Techniques and Prospects," IEEE J Sel Top Quant 20(2), (2014).
Methods: LFE
As there was no surface stress on the top and bottom boundaries of the phantoms, the anti-symmetric circular lamb wave mode was triggered.
2 2 2
2
tanh( ) ( )
tanh( ) 4
h k
h k
22 2
21
kc
2
2 222
kc
LFE:
Here c1 is the compressional wave (P-wave) velocity and c2 is the shear wave (S-wave) velocity.
J. Bao, "Lamb wave generation and detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors," University of South Carolina (2003).
Methods: FEM
Displacement by OCE
Finite element model
Results: LFE vs OCE
LFE obtained Young’s modulus
The Young’s modulus by LFE are 25kPa for 1%, 55kPa for 1.5% and 160 kPa for 2% agar phantoms.
Results: FEM vs OCE
Group velocities by OCE Group velocities by FEM
By comparing on the group velocities, the Young’s modulus by FEM are 18kPa for 1%, 50kPa for 1.5% and 160 kPa for 2% agar phantoms.
Results: Compressional tests
Uniaxial compressional test
The Young’s modulus is calculated at strain=0.1.
Results: All
shear wave equation (SWE), surface acoustic wave equation (SAE), lamb-frequency equation (LFE), finite element method (FEM) and uniaxial mechanical compressional testing (mechanical testing)
Conclusions• Combining OCE with numerical analysis is a
promising method to quantitatively reconstruct elasticity.
• LFE and the FEM can extract the Young’s modulus with higher accuracy than other simplified models such as SWE and SAE.
• Future work will entail applying this method on tissues for noninvasive assessment of elasticity.
Thank you!