Upload
sophie-sutton
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quantum Theory, Part 1, Day 2
Is There Something Inside
of the Atom?!?!?
Cathode Rays
Cathode rays are the carriers of electric current from cathode to anode inside a vacuumed tube.
Cathode rays have the following characteristics:– Emit from the cathode when electricity is passed
through an evacuated tube.– Emit in a direction perpendicular to the cathode
surface.– Travel in straight lines.– Cause glass and other materials to fluoresce.– Deflect in a magnetic field similarly to negatively
charged particles.
Crookes Tube
William Crookes
Mask holder
Cathode(-)
Anode(+)
Crookes tube(Cathode ray tube)
Mask holder
Glow
The Effect of an Obstruction on Cathode Rays
Highvoltage
cathode
source ofhigh voltage
yellow-greenfluorescence
shadow
Joseph John Thomson
1897 J. J. Thomson English
– Credited with the discovery of the electron.– His model of the atom featured negatively
charged electrons embedded in a ball of positive charge.• “Plum-Pudding” model
– Awarded the Nobel prize in 1909 for calculating the charge/mass ratio of the electron. • me /e
• The value is determined to be –5.686 X 10-12 kg/C
Thomson’s Model
Source ofElectricalPotential
Metal Plate
Gas-filledglass tube Metal plate
Stream of negativeparticles (electrons)
A Cathode Ray Tube
Thomson’s Experiment
+-
vacuum tube
metal disks
voltage source
Cathode Anode
Thomson’s Experiment
+-voltage sourceOFF
ON
Passing an electric current makes a beam appear
to move from the negative to the positive end
Thomson’s Experiment
+-voltage sourceOFF
ON
+
-
By adding an electric field…
he found that the moving pieces were negative.
Crooke’s Tube
+-
vacuum tube
metal disks
voltage source
magnet
William Crookes
Cathode Ray Experiment
Deflectionregion
Drift region
Displacement
+
-Anodes / collimators
Cathode
Volts
Conclusions• He compared the value with the mass/charge ratio for the
lightest charged particle.
• By comparison, Thomson estimated that the cathode ray particle weighed 1/1000 as much as hydrogen, the lightest atom.
• He concluded that atoms do contain subatomic particles - atoms are divisible into smaller particles.
• This conclusion contradicted Dalton’s postulate and was not widely accepted by fellow physicists and chemists of his day.
• Since any electrode material produces an identical ray, cathode ray particles are present in all types of matter - a universal negatively charged subatomic particle later named the electron.
J.J. Thomson• He proved that atoms of
any element can be made to emit tiny negative particles.
• From this he concluded that ALL atoms must contain these negative particles.
• He knew that atoms did not have a net negative charge and so there must be balancing the negative charge.
J.J. Thomson
Lord Rutherford’s Gold Foil Experiment (1909)
Worked with Bohr, Geiger, and Marsden in order to prove Thomson’s model.
Used Polonium to produce alpha particles (He+2).
Aimed alpha particles at gold foil by drilling hole in lead block.
Since the mass is evenly distributed in gold atoms, alpha particles should go straight through.
Used gold foil because it could be made only a few atoms thick.
Rutherford’s Apparatus
beam of alpha particles
radioactive substance
fluorescent screencircular - ZnS coated
gold foil
Pb blockPo
Au Foil
Fluorescent Screen, ZnS
What he expected…
Because, he thought the mass was evenly distributed in the atom
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
---
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
--
-
Alone, the subatomic particles were not enough to stop the alpha particles.
What he got…richochetingalpha particles
The Predicted Result:
expected path
expected marks on screen
mark onscreen
likely alphaparticle path
Observed Result:
How he explained it:
+
Rutherford’s Model of the Atom
Atom is mostly empty space. Small dense, positive piece
at center (core). Contains most of the atom’s
mass. Alpha particles are deflected
by it if they get close enough. Disproved Thomson’s Model This is called the Nuclear
Model
+
It was almost as incredible as if you fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper, and it came back to hit you.
"On consideration, I realized that this scattering backwards must be the result of a single collision, and when I made calculations I saw that it was impossible to get anything of that order of magnitude unless you took a system in which the greater part of the mass of the atom was concentrated in a minute nucleus. It was then that I had the idea of an atom with a minute massive center carrying a charge."
While an atom is tiny, the nucleus is ten thousand times smaller than the atom and the quarks and electrons are at least ten thousand times smaller than that. We don't know exactly how small quarks and electrons are; they are definitely smaller than 10-18 meters, and they might literally be points, but we do not know.
It is also possible that quarks and electrons are not fundamental after all, and will turn out to be made up of other, more fundamental particles. (Oh, will this madness ever end?)
Scale of the atom.
Website “The Particle Adventure”
Problem with Rutherford’s Model?!?!
We know that unlike charges attract (i.e. positive and negative), therefore what should happen between the positive nucleus and negative electrons?
Robert Millikan’s Oil Drop
Experiment (1911)
• American• Measured the charge of an electron
Millikan’s Experiment (1911)
Oil Drop Experiment
.
.
. . . ..
.
.
. . . ..
.
...
..
. . . .. ..
.
. . . .. . .
.
.. .. .
. . . .. .. . . .. .. ...
.
. . ..
. . ..
. . . .. . .. . . .
.
. . . .
.
. . . .. . .
. . . ..
.. .
. . . .. . ..
. . . . .. . ..
.. . ..
. . . .
. . . .
. . . ..
.
. . . ... .
. . . . .. .
.. . .. . . .. . .
..
. . . .. . .. . .. .
. . ...
. . ...
. . ..
...
. . ... . . .. .
.
. . .
. . . . .
. . . . .. . . .
. . . . .. . .. . . . .
.
. . . .. . . . ..
. . . ..
. . . ..
. . . ..
. . . ..
. . . .
.
.
. . . .
.
. .. . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . ..
. . . . ... . . . .
. . . . .. . . . . .
. . . ...
. . . . .. . . .
..
. . . ...
. . . .. .. . .. .
. . . . . ...
.
.. . . .
. .
. . .. .. . .
.. . .. .
. . ... . ..
. . .. .. . .
. .
.. . .
.
.
. .
. .. . .
.
. . .
.
. . .
.
. .. . ..
.. . .
. ... .
. . .
.
. . . .. . .
. . . .. . .
. . . .. . .
. . . .. .
. .. . .. . . . .
.
.
. .. . . .
.
..
. .. . . .. . . .
.
..
. . . ..
..
. . .. ...
. .. ...
. . . .. . .
.
.
. . . . .
.
.
. . . .. . .
..
. . . ..
. . . . . ... . . . . . .
.. . . . . .
. . .
.
. . . . . ... . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . ..
. . . . . . .
. . . . ... . . . ..
. . . . .. .
. . . . . ..
. . . . . ..
. . . . . ..
. . . . ..
. . . . . . .. . . .. .
. . .. . .. . . .
. . . . . .. . .. . . .
. . .. . . .
. . . .. . .
. . .. . .
. . . . . ...
. . . .
.
.
. . . .
.
. .. . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . ..
. . . . .. . . . . .
. . . . . ..
. . . . .. . . . . ..
. . . . . ..
. . . .. .
. . .. .
. . . . . ... . .
.
.
. ...
.
.. . .. .
. . . . . ..
. . .. . .
. . . . ..
... . . .
. . . . .. .
. . . . .. .
. . . .. .
. . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .. .. ..
.
.
...
. . . .. ..... . . .. .
.. . .. . .
.
..
.. .. . .. . .
.
. . .. . .
.
.
.. .
. .. .
. . ... .
oil droplets
oil droplet under observation
Charged plate
Small hole
Charged plate
-
+
Telescope
Robert Millikan(1909)
Balancing electrical and gravitational forces allowed the electron charge to be determined.Mass was calculated using charge to mass ratio (9.1093 x 10-28 g).
Oil
Atomizer
X-rays give oil drops a charge, by transferring electrons to them from the air
The charge of each drop was always a multiple of the same smaller charge.
1.60 x 10-19 C