Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Restoration & Conservation LLC Dr. James M. Cervino
e-mail: [email protected] Phone: 917-620-5287
HAZMAT OSHA Certified #1805221
Surface Phase 2 Investigation Report of 6819 Woodhaven Blvd., Queens New York
Prepared for: Damien Smith, President
First Standard Construction 70 Lafayette Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10013
Prepared By:
Dr. James M. Cervino, QEP Restoration and Conservation Advisement Group, LLC.
9-22 119th Street, College Point, NY 11356
2
Table of Contents Purpose and Summary…………………………………………………………p. 3
Introduction……………………………………………………………………...p. 4
Regional Surficial Geology and Hydrology…………………………………p. 5
Methods & Logistical Approach………………………………………………p. 6
Sample Methodology…………………………………………………………...p. 7
Field Headspace VOC Analysis……………………………………………….p. 9
Results…………………………………………………………………………… p. 10
Recommendations and Discussions………………………………………….p. 15
Asbestos-Containing Materials……………………………………………….p. 16
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….p. 16
Remedial Action Proposed….…………………………………………………p. 16
Estimated Cost…………………………………………………………………...p. 18
Appendix (site photos) …………………………………………………………p. 19
Figures:
Figure 1a……………………………………………………………………….....p. 3
Figure 1b………………………………………………………………………... p. 4
Figure 2a………………………………………………………………………... p. 5
Figure 2b………………………………………………………………………... p. 6
Figure 3……………………………………………………………………….......p. 7
Figure 4a……………………………………………………………………….... p. 8
Figures 4b, 4c, 4d……………...……………………………………………........p. 9
Figure 5a………………………………………………………………………......p. 11
Figures 5b, 5c……………………………………………………………………...p. 12
3
Purpose and Summary
The purpose for the in-situ Phase 2 investigation was to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in accordance with ASTM Standard E-1527-13 at 6819 Woodhaven Blvd (Figure 1a), located in the heart of Queens, New York, across from St John’s Cemetery. Due to the nature of the business, and “Automotive repair and auto-body repair” shop, may indicate an existing release, past release, or material threat of a release of hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures of the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property of interest (Figure 1b). RECs includes hazardous substances and petroleum products under conditions that might be compliant within the law. The term does not include “de minimis” conditions that do not present a threat to human health and/or the environment, and that may not be subject to an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Areas of concern (AOCs) were also identified during this investigation, which has shown evidence of a point source release to the site indoor main cesspool pit and potentially the groundwater, as a result of the usage history of the property. An AOC is defined as a location or area at a property where contaminated waste and/or hazardous substances (including petroleum products) may have been used, stored, treated, handled, disposed, spilled, and/or released to the environment. Figure 1a
4
Figure 1b
Introduction
On behalf of 68-19 Rego Park LLC, Restoration & Conservation Advisement
Group LLC (RCA) of Queens, New York prepared this Phase 2 Remedial
Investigation Report to investigate the AOC and chemical soils and water
characterization analysis that was detected in the soil, and the potential for off
site migration the property located at 68-19 Woodhaven Blvd. Queens, New
York 11374, (the Site). A Phase II Remedial Investigation was performed to
compile and evaluate data and information necessary to develop this Remedial
Investigation. The remedial actions detailed in this document achieve the
remedial objectives, complies with applicable environmental standards, criteria
and guidance and conforms to applicable laws and regulations. This PH2 was
prepared in conformance with the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC) Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and
Remediation for the purposes of building a commercial and residential use
5
building. The Site, Block 3148, Lot 2, is located in the Woodhaven section of
Queens adjacent to St John’s Cemetery, New York, as identified by the New
York City Department of Finance, is currently zoned as a Residential &
C o m m e r c i a l District (R4). The Site consists of a developed, almost rectangle
shaped lot, with auto body repair shop and garden center to the East and West of
the Auto Repair Shop. The Subject Property is residing to the Western side of
Woodhaven Blvd., and 68th Street. The area of the Site is depicted on Figure 2a,
Site Location Map, and the project area is shown in greater detail on the Site
Topographic Map.
Regional Surficial Geology and Hydrology
The surficial geology of Queens generally includes layers of unconsolidated
glacial deposits underlain by bedrock. The overburden glacial deposits generally
consist of clay, sand, sandy silt, sand and gravel deposits. The unconfined
deposits form surficial aquifers that are generally small and
restricted to the valley areas and are therefore irregular. Accordingly,
groundwater is not generally used as a source of potable water.
Figure 2a
6
Methods & Logistical Approach
Each of the investigative areas are described in this section. The indoor auto
body repair shop, main cesspool pit directly on the east side of the building, is
labeled S-1 (Figure 2b).
Figure 2b
Figure 2b also shows four outside test pits, B2-B3-B4-B5, on the east and west
sides of the auto repair shop. B2 & B5 each consist of both one groundwater
sample and one soil boring sample; while S-1 consists of both a water cesspool
sample and a soil boring sample. Sample IDs B2 and B3 consist of 2 vertical
continuous soil boring samples due to the need to characterize any AOC
concerns arising from the Auto-body indoor activities, and its impacts to the flow
of groundwater as identified in Radius & GeoTech Map. The map, seen in Figure
3 below, shows the directional flow of groundwater and aquifer water data
points labeled (W).
7
Figure 3
Sample Methodology
On May 20th, 2019, Restoration & Conservation LLC, advanced four exterior soil
borings, designated as B-2, B-3, B-4 and B-5 (Figures 4a-b), to terminal depths
ranging from approximately 27-37fbg. This Phase 2 investigation work plan was
developed to also characterize a groundwater (Figure 4c) investigation prior to
the proposed redevelopment, and address the RECs identified in the Phase I
Report. The scope of work proposed for the Phase II consisted of the
8
advancement of four exterior soil borings for the collection of ten soil samples for
laboratory analyses and indoor Waste Water Cesspool samples (Figure 4d). This
consisted of one grab water sample and one bottom Cesspool trap soil sample,
totaling two data points for the indoor sample analysis event. Groundwater was
not encountered indoors; however, it can be assumed that the water in the
cesspool pit may be leaching into the GW. It should be noted that groundwater
was encountered in the deeper soil borings advanced within the overburden soil
to terminal depths of 27-37 fbg where refusal was met at some of the varying
depths. The soil boring locations were selected to establish the general
subsurface conditions beneath the Site, determine conditions in soils that are
planned to be left undisturbed following planned redevelopments, and
investigate areas of concern identified in the Phase I ESA prepared for the Site.
The soil boring locations for this investigation are as follows:
• B2-B3 were near the north & southeast corner of the Site within proposed building footprint (Figure 4A). • B4-B5 were located near the northwest portion of the Site within proposed building footprint (Figure 4). • S-1 (Cesspool Pit) at the central portion of the Site within current existing auto repair building footprint (Figure 4d). • B2-B5 Groundwater Investigation, were near the northeast and southwest portion of the Site where the proposed building’s footprint will be located (Figure 4c).
Figure 4a
9
Figure 4b
Figure 4c
Figure 4d
Samples that were collected consisted of composite grab samples & VOC grabs
from each of the locations. A in-situ method using a PID-VOC MiniRay 3000
meter was used as a screening tool from different areas within the drill core
between vertical depths showed confirming results compared to the lab sample
IDs. VOC (8260) core sample samples consisted of slicing a soil sample from each
of vertical depth boring locations for statistically significant conclusions, shown
in Figure (4a-b). The VOC grabs consisted following the areas of olfactory AOCs,
which lead us to each of the test areas to avoid any conflict of Pseudoreplication.
These findings have avoided such errors based on our results, and sample
design.
Field Headspace VOC Analysis
Headspace analysis was performed on each of the acquired samples utilizing a
portable photo ionization detection (PID) meter to measure if VOCs are present
in the secured core samples. Headspace analyses were conducted by cutting a
10
slice of soil from the core sample and filling it into a 2 oz. glass jar with no head
space, followed by placing that jar into a clean zip lock bag sealing it, thereby
preventing any void. This void is referred to as the sample headspace. To
facilitate the detection of possible hydrocarbons contained within the headspace,
the sealed container was agitated for a period of approximately 30 seconds and
allowed to equilibrate. The probe of the PID was then injected through the bag to
measure the VOC concentrations present. A MiniRae 3000 PID meter was the
organic vapor analyzer selected for the head space analysis. A PID utilizes the
principle of photo ionization for detection and measurement of hydrocarbon
compounds. A PID does not respond to all compounds similarly; rather, each
compound has its own response factor relative to its calibration. For this
investigation, the PID was calibrated to isobutylene span gas to yield total VOCs
in parts per million by volume (ppmv) referenced to benzene. Hydrocarbon
relative response factors for a PID calibrated to isobutylene are published by the
manufacturer. Results of the analysis were used to adjust the sample and
analysis program to yield the most accurate and representative
results.
Note: B2 Soil Sample: This sample was accessible from a sewer well at 0 grade at the
Southeast location garden center. The drill core depth started at 6-8 fbg.
Results
A visual inspection of the samples recovered during the installation of the four
(4) soil borings was conducted to identify signs of gross chemical contamination
and to classify the soil. Site specific geology indicates soil beneath the Site
consists of light to dark brown poorly sorted fine and coarse sands, mixed with
clay-sand soils within the upper five feet. The underlying soils consist of brown
to light brown well sorted medium to coarse sands with some silt content,
cobbles and some bands of light orange to yellow-sand with mica flakes (possible
mica schist). No signs of gross contamination were observed in the five (4) soil
borings; however, the presence of gross contamination was found at the indoor
Cesspool Pit consisting of muck soils comingled with paint fragments in the soil
11
from the indoor. Glacial sedimentary sand was encountered at the terminal
depths of all soil borings to Groundwater at 37ft respectively.
North and South East: Figure (4a); Soil B2 & B3; PID-VOC readings; #1) 6-8ft
41ppm, #2) B3 0-7ft=49ppm. All other vertical depths in B2-B3 were ND readings
from PID-VOC readings.
North and South West: Figure (4b); Soil B4 & B5; PID-VOC readings; B4 0-11ft
indicate ND readings; however, B5-0-11ft show readings of 31ppm respectively
in soils boring sample ID. All other vertical depths in B4-B5 were ND readings
from PID-VOC readings.
Sample Main Test Pit (Main Cesspool Drainage Pit: Figure 5a & Test 4d).
PID-VOC readings; #1) Grab=3,710ppm, #2) Grab= 1,330ppm, #3) 789ppm.
Figure 5a
12
Figure 5b
Figure 5c
13
Sample Main Hydraulic Lift 1
PID-VOC readings; #1) ND, #2) Grab= 0.7ppm, #3) 0.8ppm 10ppm, #4)
Grab=NDppm
Sample Main Hydraulic Lift 2
PID-VOC readings; #1) Grab= NDppm, #2) Grab= 2ppm, #3) 9ppm, #4)=10ppm
Analytical Test Methods
The ten (10) soil samples collected from the Site were transported to a New York
State Certified Commercial Laboratory for analysis. Selection of the analytical
test methods was based on the NYSDEC Part 375 List Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOCs) per United States Environmental Protection Agency
(US EPA) Method 8260C, Semi Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) per
USEPA Method 8270D, Metals per USEPA Methods 6010C or 7471B,
Pesticides/Herbicides per USEPA Method 8081B and polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) per USEPA Method 8082A as applicable for the sample type and
location. The analytical results for the soil sample analysis were compared to
New York Codes Rules and Regulations (NYCRR) Part 375 Unrestricted and
Restricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCOs), as applicable. The laboratory
analysis performed on all soil samples did not detect target VOCs above the
applicable Part 375 Unrestricted Used SCO below 11ft at both East and West
testing locations. No PCBs were detected in the four (5) soil samples at
concentrations above the Part 375 UUSCOs. Low concentrations of a few VOCs
and PCBs were detected in some of the soil samples.
Sample Main Test Pit (Main Drainage Pit).
However, water and soil samples from indoor test Cesspool Pit S-1 showed gross
contamination of VOCs above 6NYCRR NYSDEC Subpart 375 Restricted Use
Industrial RSCOs. Exceedances in metals & pesticides above NYSDEC Subpart
375 Unrestricted Use and for the protection of groundwater SCO. All soils are
considered contaminated non-hazardous soils.
14
North and South East B2 & North and South West Boring Locations
Shallow Layers
Sample ID B2 between 6-8ft and B5 0-11ft boring locations indicate gross
contamination can be seen isolated within this vertical depth range (Figure 4a-b).
Several target SVOCs were detected in the shallow soil samples collected from
soil borings at concentrations above their respective 6NYCRR Part 375
Unrestricted Use (UU), Restricted Residential Use and/or Protection of Ground
Water Use Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCOs), including: benzo(a)anthracene,
benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k) fluoranthene, chrysene,
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene While additional SVOCs,
VOCs, metals, pesticides, herbicides, and PCBs, including EPH (Extractable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons) were detected in the soil samples collected from B-2
through B-3, none were at concentrations above their respective 6NYRCC Part
375 UUSCOs and for the Protection of Groundwater (Figure 4c).
North and South East B2 & North and South West Boring Locations
Deeper Layers Between 11-37ft.
None of the chemical concentrations ie., metals, VOC, SVOC, PCBs, Herbicides,
and Pesticides were shown to be above their respective 6NYRCC Part 375
UUSCOs and for the Protection of Groundwater. All soil samples from both East
and West locations below 7-11ft indicate clean native Part 375 Unrestricted Use
soils free of any historic contaminated fill. There was no presence of co-mingled
RCA, Brick and Asphalt consistent with recycled materials. These soils can
remain onsite, or if excavated, these soils can be taken to a local NYSDEC Part
360 permitted facility (Figure 4a-b).
Groundwater Samples
North and South East B2 & North and South West B5; Boring Locations
Both Groundwater samples do not pass NYSDEC TOGS Regulatory Limits for
metals, SVOCs and VOCs. Exceedances B5 water sample for VOCs are not meet
due to not being achievable by 8260 methods and their respective RL (Reporting
Limits), however, the metals, such as Arsenic, Lead, Chromium, Mercury, Nickel,
Copper, Cadmium, Zinc, Antimony, and Barium do fail TOGS as a result of the
15
indoor painting and stripping of automotive activities for the past 20+ years
(Figure 4c). It appears that the tenant is sanding, stripping with thinners and
painting of cars, including oil changes that are acting as a point source of
chemical contamination that is effecting the groundwater from the Cesspool
center pit. The pathway to the groundwater appears to be coming from the
center Cesspool pit that leaches into the main sewer or storm water system that
makes its way into the GW (Figure 4d).
Recommendations & Discussion
This Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Limited Subsurface Investigation
was conducted for the property located at 6819 Woodhaven Blvd located in the
heart of Queens New York New York, to address Recognized Environmental
Conditions (RECs) which were identified in the Phase I ESA dated April, 2019,
characterize the subsurface conditions prior to proposed redevelopment, and to
further define the environmental quality of the Site. This Phase 2 investigation on
the Site was completed in accordance with good commercial and customary
practice and generally accepted protocols within the consulting industry. The
scope of work proposed for the Phase II ESA consisted of the advancement of
four (4) exterior soil borings locations for the collection of fifteen (15) soil samples
for laboratory analyses and the (2) groundwater samples on both East and West
sides of the property, and (1) soil and (1) water sample from the Cesspool
directly in the center of the indoor Auto Repair Shop. The SVOCs detected are a
class of organic compounds referred to as Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(PAHs) which are typically formed during the incomplete burning of organic
material including wood, coal, oil, gasoline and automotive paining activities.
The concentrations of PAHs, in conjunction with the lead, mercury and zinc, and
detected in the in the shallow soils and GW are typical of concentrations found in
areas with this type Automotive Repair business activities. Historic fill such as
coal/incinerator ash and cinders, were not found at the site at any of the boring
locations.
16
Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM)
Asbestos-containing building materials are generally classified as friable or non-
friable. Friable ACM are those which can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to
powder by hand pressure, or by normal use or maintenance can be expected to
emit asbestos fibers into the air. Non-friable ACM is a potential concern if it is
damaged by maintenance work, demolition, or other activities, at which time it
may be considered friable. It should be noted that the limited visual screening
survey conducted under the scope of work for this assessment does not
constitute a full asbestos inspection, in which all areas of the buildings would
have been thoroughly surveyed and sampled. Restoration & Conservation did
note the potential insulated pipes and coatings that may indicate the presence of
ACM on the Subject Property.
Conclusions
We recommend that an immediate clean-up of the indoor center Cesspool pit;
due to the AOCs and point source of chemical contaminants listed under RCRA.
These chemicals are being rinsed into these main indoor Cesspool test pit, found
directly in the center of the indoor site work area, which may constitute a release
listed as a NYSDEC Spill. Remediation, and/or removal of the center Cesspool
Pit will prevent further contamination to the site Groundwater.
Remedial Action Proposed
1) Excavation, of a 20x20, and10ft depth, section surrounding the Cesspool is
needed.
2) Dismantle all automotive operations that result in a discharge of chemical contaminants into this said Cesspool. After cessation of automotive activities; submit all lab reports to an appropriate Class B facility that accepts petroleum contaminated soils followed by transportation/disposal of impacted soils within this 20x20ft grid.
3) Development of a plan for the handling of groundwater within the
excavation area for purposes of construction and any future dewatering. This will include the installation of temporary groundwater monitoring wells for the collection of representative groundwater data. (Groundwater Management).
17
4) Quarterly monitoring of the groundwater will be necessary to see if
cessation of all automotive activities reduces the chemical concentration of the reported metals, SVOCs, and VOCs respectively.
5) An excavator or other feasible means of excavation will be utilized to
remove impacted soils down to and below the groundwater interface, to the final planned excavation depth. A field geologist will direct the removal of soils until field screening and/or other field characteristics indicate that the areas of contamination have been appropriately addressed, as feasible via excavation.
6) The proposed waste characterization testing includes full Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Semi-Volatile Compounds (SVOCs), Metals, Pesticides, Herbicides, Full Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Characteristics (including Ignitability, Reactivity (pH) and Corrosivity (IRC)), Target Compound List (TCL) VOCs ( NYSDEC CP-51 List by EPA Methods 8021 and 8270 listed as a subset), SVOCs, Target Analytes List (TALs)/Priority Pollutant List Metals (PP+40), Pesticides, PCBs, Herbicides, Cyanide, Hexavalent & Trivalent Chromium and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) DROs and GROs by EPA Method performed by a New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) ELAP-certified Laboratory.
7) The excavation area will be secured/stabilized and endpoint samples will be collected at select sidewalls of the excavation at a frequency of one grab sample (at 2/3 depth of the wall) at a frequency dependent upon the overall size of the excavation. In instances where the bottom of the excavation area is in groundwater or other fill material (concrete) is present that is not conducive to sampling, no endpoint samples will be collected. If end point samples are not able to be collected, groundwater samples may be collected in the standing excavation, in lieu of soil end points. All samples will be maintained in an ice-packed cooler and transported under strict chain-of-custody to a NYSDOH-ELAP-certified laboratory for VOC analysis by EPA Method 8260, Semi-Volatile Organics by EPA Method 8270 and Target Analyte List Metals .
8) During the excavation, loading and off-site transportation of the remaining construction waste, the contractor will take the following precautions prior to and during work activities, and excavation that disturb soil to reduce/eliminate exposures to community. If necessary, the material excavated will be stockpiled temporarily on-site atop of and covered by 10-mil plastic sheeting. Live loading will be the preferred method of waste material handling, as feasible, after sufficient characterization has been completed.
9) A continued soil characterization sampling program will be performed by Restoration & Conservation LLC to ensure complete characterization of
18
the material to be excavated, prior to off-site transportation and disposal. This will allow Restoration to determine the appropriate treatment, recycling/disposal options for off-site transportation, procure any required permits; and assure that off-site disposal requirements for the waste. It is important to note that all soils below 7-11 ft are clean native sandy soils fee of historic fill. Remediation of all the catch basins, sewer systems including storm water wells will correct any point sources of pollution.
Estimated cost for remediation:
1) Environmental Mobilization and Parameter Grid Set Up 2) NYSDEC Spill Reporting 3) Remedial Action Work Plan 4) Waste Classification Horizontal & Vertical Delineation Plan 5) Health & Safety Plan 6) CAMP and Environmental Management 7) Excavator & Operator 8) Hauling and Disposal of 440cubic yards of impacted soils 9) Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation 10) Quarterly Reporting 11) NYSDEC Closure Report
Cost Estimate Breakdown Environmental Reporting, Testing and Monitoring= $40,000 Construction Services 2 Weeks=$30,000 Removal of Soils (440cy)=$29,700 Monitoring Well Installation=$5,500 Total = $105,200
I, Dr. James M. Cervino, of Restoration & Conservation Advisement Group LLC, am a Qualified Environmental Professional as defined in §43-140. I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge, I/my firm meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 312 and agree to this Phase 2 Investigation Report. Dr. James M. Cervino June 10th 2019 QEP Name
QEP Signature
19
APPENDIX Site Photos
20
Page 1 of 118
Page 2 of 118
Page 3 of 118
Page 4 of 118
Page 5 of 118
Page 6 of 118
Page 7 of 118
Page 8 of 118
Page 9 of 118
Page 10 of 118
Page 11 of 118
Page 12 of 118
Page 13 of 118
Page 14 of 118
Page 15 of 118
Page 16 of 118
Page 17 of 118
Page 18 of 118
Page 19 of 118
Page 20 of 118
Page 21 of 118
Page 22 of 118
Page 23 of 118
Page 24 of 118
Page 25 of 118
Page 26 of 118
Page 27 of 118
Page 28 of 118
Page 29 of 118
Page 30 of 118
Page 31 of 118
Page 32 of 118
Page 33 of 118
Page 34 of 118
Page 35 of 118
Page 36 of 118
Page 37 of 118
Page 38 of 118
Page 39 of 118
Page 40 of 118
Page 41 of 118
Page 42 of 118
Page 43 of 118
Page 44 of 118
Page 45 of 118
Page 46 of 118
Page 47 of 118
Page 48 of 118
Page 49 of 118
Page 50 of 118
Page 51 of 118
Page 52 of 118
Page 53 of 118
Page 54 of 118
Page 55 of 118
Page 56 of 118
Page 57 of 118
Page 58 of 118
Page 59 of 118
Page 60 of 118
Page 61 of 118
Page 62 of 118
Page 63 of 118
Page 64 of 118
Page 65 of 118
Page 66 of 118
Page 67 of 118
Page 68 of 118
Page 69 of 118
Page 70 of 118
Page 71 of 118
Page 72 of 118
Page 73 of 118
Page 74 of 118
Page 75 of 118
Page 76 of 118
Page 77 of 118
Page 78 of 118
Page 79 of 118
Page 80 of 118
Page 81 of 118
Page 82 of 118
Page 83 of 118
Page 84 of 118
Page 85 of 118
Page 86 of 118
Page 87 of 118
Page 88 of 118
Page 89 of 118
Page 90 of 118
Page 91 of 118
Page 92 of 118
Page 93 of 118
Page 94 of 118
Page 95 of 118
Page 96 of 118
Page 97 of 118
Page 98 of 118
Page 99 of 118
Page 100 of 118
Page 101 of 118
Page 102 of 118
Page 103 of 118
Page 104 of 118
Page 105 of 118
Page 106 of 118
Page 107 of 118
Page 108 of 118
Page 109 of 118
Page 110 of 118
Page 111 of 118
Page 112 of 118
Page 113 of 118
Page 114 of 118
Page 115 of 118
Page 116 of 118
Page 117 of 118
Page 118 of 118
Page 1 of 107
Page 2 of 107
Page 3 of 107
Page 4 of 107
Page 5 of 107
Page 6 of 107
Page 7 of 107
Page 8 of 107
Page 9 of 107
Page 10 of 107
Page 11 of 107
Page 12 of 107
Page 13 of 107
Page 14 of 107
Page 15 of 107
Page 16 of 107
Page 17 of 107
Page 18 of 107
Page 19 of 107
Page 20 of 107
Page 21 of 107
Page 22 of 107
Page 23 of 107
Page 24 of 107
Page 25 of 107
Page 26 of 107
Page 27 of 107
Page 28 of 107
Page 29 of 107
Page 30 of 107
Page 31 of 107
Page 32 of 107
Page 33 of 107
Page 34 of 107
Page 35 of 107
Page 36 of 107
Page 37 of 107
Page 38 of 107
Page 39 of 107
Page 40 of 107
Page 41 of 107
Page 42 of 107
Page 43 of 107
Page 44 of 107
Page 45 of 107
Page 46 of 107
Page 47 of 107
Page 48 of 107
Page 49 of 107
Page 50 of 107
Page 51 of 107
Page 52 of 107
Page 53 of 107
Page 54 of 107
Page 55 of 107
Page 56 of 107
Page 57 of 107
Page 58 of 107
Page 59 of 107
Page 60 of 107
Page 61 of 107
Page 62 of 107
Page 63 of 107
Page 64 of 107
Page 65 of 107
Page 66 of 107
Page 67 of 107
Page 68 of 107
Page 69 of 107
Page 70 of 107
Page 71 of 107
Page 72 of 107
Page 73 of 107
Page 74 of 107
Page 75 of 107
Page 76 of 107
Page 77 of 107
Page 78 of 107
Page 79 of 107
Page 80 of 107
Page 81 of 107
Page 82 of 107
Page 83 of 107
Page 84 of 107
Page 85 of 107
Page 86 of 107
Page 87 of 107
Page 88 of 107
Page 89 of 107
Page 90 of 107
Page 91 of 107
Page 92 of 107
Page 93 of 107
Page 94 of 107
Page 95 of 107
Page 96 of 107
Page 97 of 107
Page 98 of 107
Page 99 of 107
Page 100 of 107
Page 101 of 107
Page 102 of 107
Page 103 of 107
Page 104 of 107
Page 105 of 107
Page 106 of 107
Page 107 of 107
Page 1 of 42
Page 2 of 42
Page 3 of 42
Page 4 of 42
Page 5 of 42
Page 6 of 42
Page 7 of 42
Page 8 of 42
Page 9 of 42
Page 10 of 42
Page 11 of 42
Page 12 of 42
Page 13 of 42
Page 14 of 42
Page 15 of 42
Page 16 of 42
Page 17 of 42
Page 18 of 42
Page 19 of 42
Page 20 of 42
Page 21 of 42
Page 22 of 42
Page 23 of 42
Page 24 of 42
Page 25 of 42
Page 26 of 42
Page 27 of 42
Page 28 of 42
Page 29 of 42
Page 30 of 42
Page 31 of 42
Page 32 of 42
Page 33 of 42
Page 34 of 42
Page 35 of 42
Page 36 of 42
Page 37 of 42
Page 38 of 42
Page 39 of 42
Page 40 of 42
Page 41 of 42
Page 42 of 42
Page 1 of 60
Page 2 of 60
Page 3 of 60
Page 4 of 60
Page 5 of 60
Page 6 of 60
Page 7 of 60
Page 8 of 60
Page 9 of 60
Page 10 of 60
Page 11 of 60
Page 12 of 60
Page 13 of 60
Page 14 of 60
Page 15 of 60
Page 16 of 60
Page 17 of 60
Page 18 of 60
Page 19 of 60
Page 20 of 60
Page 21 of 60
Page 22 of 60
Page 23 of 60
Page 24 of 60
Page 25 of 60
Page 26 of 60
Page 27 of 60
Page 28 of 60
Page 29 of 60
Page 30 of 60
Page 31 of 60
Page 32 of 60
Page 33 of 60
Page 34 of 60
Page 35 of 60
Page 36 of 60
Page 37 of 60
Page 38 of 60
Page 39 of 60
Page 40 of 60
Page 41 of 60
Page 42 of 60
Page 43 of 60
Page 44 of 60
Page 45 of 60
Page 46 of 60
Page 47 of 60
Page 48 of 60
Page 49 of 60
Page 50 of 60
Page 51 of 60
Page 52 of 60
Page 53 of 60
Page 54 of 60
Page 55 of 60
Page 56 of 60
Page 57 of 60
Page 58 of 60
Page 59 of 60
Page 60 of 60