21
Rob Geertman 06/15/22 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

Rob Geertman

04/11/23

Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

Page 2: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

204/11/23Presentation Name

Is this our future?

Page 3: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

304/11/23Presentation Name

Why is there a need for a “solvent toolbox”?

• Reactions depend on solvents

• Drug substance production and properties are closely related to solvents

- choosing solvents for crystallization

- determining relative stability in different environments

(pseudo polymorphs, co-crystals)

• Drug product production and properties can be closely related to compatibility with other excipients– (Polymeric) Dosage forms– Stabilizing amorphous material

Page 4: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

404/11/23Presentation Name

Solvents & Reactions

• In general all reactants need to be dissolved• Reaction mechanism, rate and byproduct formation may be solvent

dependent

Page 5: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

504/11/23Presentation Name

reactants

TS

products

Activation Barrier = kinetics

Distribution Coefficient =thermodynamics

Solvent 1

Solvent 2

Page 6: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

604/11/23Presentation Name

Example: “Simple” SN2 reaction

Page 7: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

704/11/23Presentation Name

What happens on a molecular level?

Page 8: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

804/11/23Presentation Name

What happens in the COSMO universe?

Page 9: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

904/11/23Presentation Name

In charge density profiles

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

-0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03

start mat

TS(R)

TS(S)

prod (R)

prod (S)

Page 10: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1004/11/23Presentation Name

What is the influence of the solvent?

Solvent Temperature (K) Relative rate

Pentane 312 4E-15

Cyclopentane 327 2E-13

H2O 373 4E-6

Acetone 367 5E-4

NMP 375 6E-3

DMF 386 9E-3

Page 11: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1104/11/23Presentation Name

Solvents & Drug Substance

• Stability data needed when comparing different compositions (pseudopolymorph or co-crystal)

• Solubility data needed for process selection

Page 12: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1204/11/23Presentation Name

Polymorphism in COSMO

Polymorph 1

Polymorph 2

Solvent 1

Solvent 2

Solvent 3

melt

DSC data or solubility fitting COSMO

Page 13: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1304/11/23Presentation Name

Pseudo Polymorphism in COSMO

Polymorph 1

Pseudo Polymorph 2

Solvent 1

Solvent 2

Solvent 3

melt

DSC data or solubility fitting COSMO

mmeelltt

melt

Page 14: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1404/11/23Presentation Name

Page 15: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1504/11/23Presentation Name

Example

• Hydrate vs true polymorph

– Water as solvent decreases solubility solvate vs true polymorph

– Methanol as solvent increases solubility solvate vs true polymorph

– Heptane as solvent decreases solubility solvate vs true polymorph

The COSMO approach makes its possible to relate stability and solvent composition

Page 16: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1604/11/23Presentation Name

Process selection – selecting a solvent

• Cooling crystallization – select a high temperature dependence

• Antisolvent crystallization – select miscible good solvent / poor solvent pair

• Be aware of other restraints – chemical stability, (pseudo)polymorphism

Page 17: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1704/11/23Presentation Name

Cooling crystallization – calculate relative solubility at two temperatures

T=0 T=50

compound log(x) log(x) Delta log(x)

pentane -8.73601 -5.81084 -2.92517

propanone -2.12203 -1.39085 -0.73119

methanol -2.01551 -1.23944 -0.77607

2-propanol -2.30919 -1.5227 -0.78649

ethylacetate -3.05291 -2.03874 -1.01417

furane -5.61278 -3.55548 -2.0573

furfural -2.88586 -1.88005 -1.00581

thf -1.10725 -0.90952 -0.19773

dimethylformamide -0.65238 -0.37424 -0.27815

acetonitrile -3.03592 -1.89279 -1.14313

h2o -3.57792 -2.93977 -0.63815

NMP -0.2177 -0.1506 -0.0671

Page 18: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1804/11/23Presentation Name

Anti solvent selection – calculate the solubility in a solvent/anti solvent system

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91

mole fraction acetone

rela

tive

so

lub

ilit

y

Example: paracetamol in acetone/heptane

Page 19: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

1904/11/23Presentation Name

Drug product• Compatibility with polymers (polymer based dosage forms)• Water/oil distribution (important for emulsions and intestinal uptake)

Experimental distribution coefficient vs predicted distribution coefficient (pKa from Cosmotherm)

y = 1.0054x + 0.1672

R2 = 0.8229

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

-3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

Log D (experiment)

Lo

g D

(ca

lcu

late

d)

Raniditin

Org4000

Org2324

Org36410

Org2723

Org2322

Org893

Org3340

Org224

Org30268

Page 20: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

2004/11/23Presentation Name

Conclusions

Synthesis Phys ChemProp

ProcessDevelopment

DrugProduct

reactions solubility & stability

solvent &method selection

solubility & stability

Page 21: Rob Geertman 8/23/2014 Cosmotherm – the Ideal Solvent Toolbox?

2104/11/23Presentation Name

Conclusions

• The COSMO approach is a good qualitative toolbox

– Calculations are fairly straightforward

– A lot of options can be considered

• The COSMO approach needs to be improved for use as a quantitative toolbox