School Accountability Report...School Accountability Report Card Reported for School Year 2012-13 Published During 2013-14 i + * * I + Eastside Elementary School EùtiJr ti rñn.æ

School Accountability Report Card

+

Published During 2013-14Reported for School Year 2012-13

++

i+

**

I+

Eastside Elementary School

EùtiJrti rñn.æ

5.1þJl

The SchoolAccountability Report Card (SARC), which is required by law to be published annually, contains information

about the condition and perfoimance of êach California public school. More information about SARC requirements is

available on the SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca,gov/talaclsal. For additional information about the school, parents

and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.

l. Data and AccessDataQuest

Dataeuest is an online data tool located at that contains additional information about this

school and comparisons of the school to th ate. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic

system that proúides reports for accountability (e.g. Academic Performance lndex APl, Adequate Yearly Progress AYP),

tést data, enrollment, graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners.

lnternet Accesslnternet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.9., the California State

Library). Access to the lnternei at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis

Other-úse restrictions include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on

availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents.

Additional lnformation

For further information regarding the data elements and terms used in the SARC see the 2012'13 Academicpedormance tndex Reports tnfõrmation Guide located on the CDE API Web page at http://wr¡¡w.cde.ca.gov/ta/aclap/.

ll. About This SchoolContact lnformation (School Year 2013-141

This section provides the school's contact information.DistrictSchool

Eastside Union ElementaryD¡strict NameSchool Name Eastside Elementary School

661 -952-1 200Phone NumberSfeet 6742 East Avenue H

http://www.eastside k1 2.ca.us/Web SiteC¡ty, State, Z¡p Lancaster, CA 93535

Dr Mark E. MarshallSuperintendentPhone Number 661 -946-3907

[email protected] 2.ca.usE-mail AddressMargo DealPrincipal

19-64477-6012967CDS [email protected] 2.ca.usE-mail Address

School Innovations & Achievement on 5l23l2OL4 IOzLL;26 AM Page 1 of 15Generated by


School Accountability Report CardPublished During 2013-1 4Reported for School Year 2012-13

School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2012'131

This section provides information about the school, its programs and its goals'

Eastside Elementary ll learners grade levelwork every day, Students,

párlñtl, community, We are committed to preparing our children for a

iuccessful acadeniic provide a quality instructional program which motivates

and meets the needs of each child in a positive, nurturing environment,

We envision Eastside as a schoolwhere.,.. Everyone is treated with resPect.. Self-esteem is fostered in all students.. Civic pride and loyalty are developed.. High expectations are held for all students.

Eastside will be recognized as a schoolwhere students receive a balanced education which focuses on their physical,

emotional, social, anã academic needs. We will promote open communication with all stakeholders to regularly

assess and address the changing needs of students and our community.

Opportunities for Parental lnvolvement (School Year 2012'131

This section provides information about opportunities for parents to become involved with school activities.

Gontact percon Name¡ Margo Deal Contact Person Phone ilumber: 661-946-3907

There will be increased parent involvement with Eastside Elementary School. We will increase parent involvement

through schoolsponsoród functions, including family game nights, family/principal meetings, Literacy Night, computer

classãs, English'classes, parenting classes, School Site Council meetings, Student of.the. Month and Honor Roll

assemblies.-Our Parent Tbacher Àssociation will participate in various fundraisers and school functions.

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 20'12'131

This table displays the number of students enrolled in each grade level at the school.

Number of Sh¡dentsGrade LevelI{umber of StudentsGrade Level

0Grade 8110Kindergarten

0Ungraded Elementary127Grade 1

0Grade 9121Grade 2

0Grade 10129Grade 3

0Grade 11119Grade 4

0Grade 1212',1Grade 5

0Ungraded Secondary1',t1Grade 6

Total Enrollment 8380Grade 7

School Innovat¡ons & Achievement on 5/23/ 2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page 2 of 15Generated by


School Accountability Report CardPublished During 201 3-1 4Reporled for School Year 2012-13

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Yea¡ 2012'13l-

Thig table dieplays the percent of studentE enrolled at the school who are identified as being in a particular group.

Percent of TotalEnrollment

Perc¿nt ofTotrlEnrollment

GroupGroup

12.30o/o'15,900/o WhltGBlack or Afrlcan Amerlcan

2.100/o0.ã00/o Two or llore Rac€¡Amerlcan Indlan or Ala¡ka ilaUve

86.00%Socloeconomlcally Dlcadvantaged0.700/oAslan

46,200/o1.1oo/o Englloh Learner¡Flllplno

'10,10o/o67.10o/o Stud€nts wltfi Dlaablllüeclllspanlc or latlno

0.40o/of{atlve Hawaiian or Paclfic Islander

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)

This table displays by grade level the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size categoryoftotal students

2012-L320LL-t22010-11

ilumber of ClassroomsNumber of ClassnoomsNumber of ClassroomsAvg.CIass

Size L-20 2L-32 33+33+

Avg.Class

Size 1-20 2L-32 33+

Avg.Class

Size 1-20 2L-32Grade Level

19.0 5 3020.5 o 0 016.4 35 0 0Kindergarton

19.0 't7 2420,3 36 0 023,4 0 30 01

5 3024 12 0 21.036 0 0 22.32 17.7

11 3036 0 0 19.00 30 0 18.73 24.6

240 24 0 25.0 50 24 0 28.54 27.O

245 24 0 21.0 105 6 18 22.65 29.0

'12 30 20 0 26.0 100 l8 1 32.06 31 .3

Othêr

School Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/2O14 LO:LL:26 AM Page 3 of 15Generated by


School Accountability Report CardPublished During 201 3-1 4Reported for School Year 2012-13

lll. School GlimateSchool Safety Plan (School Year 2012-131

This eec'tion provides information about the echool'g comprehensive safety plan.

The schoolcreated and adopted a Schoolsafety Plan for lhe2011-2012 schoolyear, The plan was reviewed

with thE staff.

Date School Safety Plan last reviewed: 111412013

Suspensions and ExpulsionsThis table d rate of suspensions and expulsions (the total number of suspended students suspended divided

the total at the school and district levels for the most recent th r periodisplays theenrollment)

DlstrictSchool

20L2-L32010-11 20LL-t220lo-11 20tt-L2 2012-t3Rat€

12,2013.40 11.503.10 5.208.50Suspenslons

0.500.70 0.200.10 0.40Expulslons o.20

School Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page 4 of 15Generated by


School Accountability Report GardPublished During 201 3-1 4Reporled for School Year 2012-13

lV. School FacilitiesSchool Facility Condltions (School Year 2013-141

This section provides information about the condition of the school's grounds, buildings, and restrooms, and a description

of any planned or recently completed facility improvements.

every aspect of the learning process, from structural

f¿3Xï3:'.i¿3 : lï ;5 tì::"ffå ff ì ff Låä:.i; ill ffi !ßiüire kept clean and safe, maintained on a daily basis, and

inspected regularly by groundskeepers and maintenance workers'

Planned lmprovements (School Year 20'13'20141

N/A

School Facility Good Repair Status (School Year 2013'141

This table displays the results of the most recently completed school site inspection to determine the school facility'sstatus.

Overaf l Summary of School Facility Good Repair Status (School Year 2013'141

This table displays the overall summary of the results of the most recently completed school site inspection

Date of inspection: 211212014Completion date of inspection form:211212014

Repa¡r Stahrs

Poor

Repair f{eeded andAct¡on Taken or Planned

Good Fai¡Item Inspected

XSystems: Gas Leaks, Mechanic¡U HVAC,Sewer

XInterior: Interior Surfacesrepaired exterior painl, rcom221XCleanliness: Overall Cleanliness'

Pest/Vermin Infestat¡onXElectrical: ElecFicalXResbooms/Founta¡ns: Restrooms, Sinks

XSafety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials

XStructural: Structural Damage, Roofs

XE¡<ternal : Playground/School Grounds'Windows/ Doorc/Gates/ Fences

Facility Condition

Good Fair PoorExemplaryItem Inspected

XOverall Summary


Generated by school Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page 5 of 15


V. TeachersTeacher Credentlals

This table displays the number of teachers assigned to the school with a full credential, without a full credential, and

those teachinþ outsiOe of their subject area oi cómpetence, Detailed information about teacher qualifications can be

found on the DataQuest Web Page at

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher PositionsThis table displays the number of teacher misassignments (teachers assigned without proper legal

to teach theauthorization) and the

number of vacant teacher positio ns (not filled by a single designated teacher assigned entire course at the

beginn ing of the school year or semester) Note: "Misassignments" refers to the numbe r of positions filled by teachers, subject area, student group, etc. Total Teacher Misassignmentswho lack legalauthorization to

includes the number of Misassteach that grade levelignments of Teachers of English Learners.

Core Academic Glasses Taught by No Ch¡ld Left Behind Compliant Teachers(School Year 2012-131

The federal ESEA, also known as NCLB, requires that core academic subjects be taught by Highly Qualified Teachers,

defined as having at least a bachelor's degree, an appropriate California teaching credential, and demonstrated core

academic subjecl area competence. For more information, see the CDE lmproving Teacher and Principal Quality Web

page at http://www.cde. ca. gov/nclb/sr/tq/.

Note: High-poverty schools are def¡ned as those schools w¡th sUdent elig¡bility of approximately 40 perænt or more in Ûle free and reduced price meals progr¿m. Low-

poverty ;chools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.

D¡strlctSchool

20L2-L320LL-12 20L2-L32010-11Teachels

14638 3637Wlth Full CredenUal

31 11Wlthout Full Credential

nla00 0Teachlng Outslde Subject Area of Compet€nc€

2013-L420LL-12 20L2-L3Indicator

0 00Mlsassignments of Teacherc of English Learnerc

10Vacant Teacher Positions

0 00Tota¡ Teacher Misassignments

Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects

Taught by l{on-Highly Qualified TeachersTaught by Highly Qualified TeachersLocation of Classes

0.00%100.00%This School

0.00%100.00%All Schools in District

0.007o100.00o/oH¡gh-Poverty Schools in District

0.00o/o0.00%Low-Poverty Schools in District


Generated by school Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/ 2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page 6 of 15


Vl. Support StaffAcademic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Yea¡ 2012-131

This table displays, in units of full-time equivalents (FTE), the number of academic counselors and other support staff

who are assigned to the school and the average number of students per academic counselor. One FTE equals one staff

member working full time; one FTE could also two staff members who each work 50 nt of full time

Vll. Curriculum and Instruct¡onal MaterialsQuality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and lnstructional Materials(SchoolYear 2013-141

Textbook lnformationThis section provides information about the quality, currency, and availability of the stand-ards-aligned textbooks and

other instruciional materials used at the school, and informátion about the school's use of any supplemental curriculum or

non-adopted textbooks or instructional materials. lnformation should also be provided specifying whether these

instructiónal materials were selected from the most recent list of standards-based materials adopted by the State Board

of Education (SBE) or local governing board.

Every student has a set of textbooks for use in the classroom or to take home as necessary. This assures ho.mework

assignments can be done in a timely fashion. All instructional materials and textbooks utilized are aligned with state

contént standards and are selectedÎrom the state adoption list. A complete list of instructional materials and

textbooks currently in use is available upon request'

Average Number of Sh¡dent¡ per AcademlcCoun¡elorf{umber of FTE Asslgned to Schoolflüe

Academlc Counselor

Counselor (SoclaUBehavloral or CareerD€vêlopm€nt)

Llbrary Media Teacher (Librarian)

L00Library Media Services Stafr(paraprofessional)

0.50Psychologist

Social Worker

0.25Nurce

1.30Speech/ Language/ Hearing Specialist

1.00Resource Specialist (non'teaching)

Otfier

School Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/2O14 LO'-LL"26 AM Page 7 of 15Generated by


School Accountability Report CardPublished During 201 3-1 4Reported for School Year 2012-13

This seclion provides information if any insufficiency exists, and the reason that each pupil doea not have euffícienttextbooks or instruc-tional materials.

Textbook ListThis table displays textbooks and instructional materials used in the district in the core subject areas of English-LanguageArts, Mathematics, Science, and History-Social Science,

Percent of Pupils Who Lack Their Own Assigned Textbooks and lnstructional MaterialsThis table displays information about the percent of pupils who lack their own assigned textbooks and instructionalmaterials

Pe¡rcent of PupilsWho Lack Their Own

Assigned Textbooks andInstructional MaterialsCore Curiculum Area

lYoReading/Language Arts

0ToMethemat¡cs

ïYoScience

Oo/oHistory-Social Science

0o/oFore¡gn language

ÙYoHealtll

OYoVisual and Perform¡ng Arts

Science tåboratory Equ¡pment (grades 9-12)

0o/o

Textbook I nformation Collection Date: 812812013

Te¡¡tbook Tlüe andlor Publlsher Year of AdopUonSubject Area

Houghton-Mifflin 2002Engllsh-language Arts

Scott Foresman 2006Hlstory-Social Sclence

2008Mathemat¡cs Harcourt School Publishers

Houghton Mifflin 2008Sclence


Generated by School Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/ 2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page I of 15

School Accountability Report CardPublished During 201 3-1 4Reporled for School Year 2012-13

Vlll. School Finances

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Yea¡ 2011-121

This table displays a comparison of the school's per pupil expenditures from unrestricled (basic) sources with otherschools ¡n ttré C¡étr¡ct and throughout the state, and a comparison of the average teacher salary at the_ school site with

average teacher salaries at thelistrict and state levels. Detailed information regarding school expenditures can-be foundat theturrent Expense of Education Web page at and teacher salaries can be found on

the Certificated Sãlaries and Benefits Web page a . To look up expenditures and salaries

for a specific school district, see the Ed-Data Web site at: http://www.ed-data.org.

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2012-131

This section provides information about the programs and supplemental services that are available at the school and

funded through either categorical or other sources.

Eastside Elementary School offers two intervention program. The first is to support the English_Learner students.These students are offered the SOAR intervention program to assist in the academic content. Students that are

Basic, Below Basic or Far Below Basic or are recommended by the SST team can attend the lntervention program

that uses Standards Plus both before and after school for 30 minutes.

Average Teacher SalaryExpendlhrres Per Pupll(Baslc)

Total Expendlh¡res PerPupll

Expendltures Per Pupll(Supplemental)

Subject Area

School

$ô5,38ô.00District

Percent Difference - Schooland DisEict

$5,537.00 $66,594.00State

Percent Difference - Schooland State


Generated by School Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/ 2O14 10:11:26 AM Page 9 of 15


Teacher and Admlnlstrative Salarles (Flscal Year 2011-12!-

This table displays diEtrict salaries for teachers, principals, and superintendents, and compares theee figures to the stateaverages for districts of the same type and size. The table also displays teacher and administrative salaries as a percentof a districl's budget, and compares these figures to the state averages for distric'ts of the same type and size, Detailedinformation regarding salaries may be found on the Certificated Salaries and Benefits Web page athttp ://www. cde. ca. gov/ds/fdlcs/.

State Average For Dlstrlct¡ In SameCatcgory

D¡¡tdctRang€

$40, I 29.00 941,327.00Beglnnlng Teacher Salary

$63,903.00$64,1 75.00Mld-Range Teacher Salary

$81,573.00$86,817,00H¡ghe6t Teacher Salary

$100,797.00 $103,887.00Average Princlpal Salary (Elementary)

$102,376.00 $107,439.00Average Principal Sala¡y (Middle)

$0.00 $102,399.00Average Prlncipal Salary (High)

$1 35,1 69.00 $155,551 ,00Superintendent Salary

42.0o/o 41.0o/oPercent of Budget for Teacher Salaries

6.0o/o 6.0oloPercent of Budget for Administrative Salaries


Generated by School Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page 1O of 15

School Accountability Report CardPublished During 2013-1 4Reporled for School Year 2012-13

lX. Student Performance

Standardized Testlng and Reporting Program

The Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program consists of several key components, including the CaliforniaStandards Tests (CSTs); the California Modified Assessment (CMA), and the California Alternate PerformanceAssessment (CAPA). The CSTs ínclude English-language arts (El-A) and mathematics in grades two through eleven;science in grades five, eight, and nine through eleven; and history-social science in grades eight, and nine througheleven, Thè CAPA includes El-A and mathematics in grades two through eleven, and science for grades five, eight, andten. The CAPA is given to those students with significant cognitive disabilities whose disabilities prevent them from takingeither the CSTs with accommodations or modifications or the CMA with accommodations. The CMA is an alternateassessment that is based on the modified achievement standards in El-A for grades three through eleven; mathematicsfor grades three through seven, Algebra l, and Geometry; and science in grades five and eight, and Life Science in grade

ten, The CMA is designed to assess those students whose disabilities preclude them from achieving grade-levelproficiency on an assessment of the California content standards or without accommodations.

The assessments under the STAR Program show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards.Student scores are reported as performance levels. Detailed information regarding the STAR Program results for eachgrade and performance level, including the percent of students not tested, can be found on the CDE StandardizedTesting and Reporting (STAR) Results Web site at htto://star.cde.ca.gov.

Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students - Three-Year Compar¡sonThis table displays the percent of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either beceuse the number of students in th¡s category is too small for statisticalaccuracy or to protect student privacy

StateSchool District

20L2-t3 2010-11 20tL-L2 20L2-L32010-11 2OLL.L2 20t2-13 2010-11 20tt-L2Subject

54o/o 560/0 55o/o34o/o 43o/o 37o/o 37gio 4Ùo/o 360/oEnglish-Language Arts

49o/o 50o/o 50o/o42o/o 460/0 42o/o 397o 43o/o 38o/oMathemat¡cs

57o/o 60% 59Yo36% 40o/o 31o/o 45o/o 48Yo 37o/oScience

48o/o 49o/o 49Yo34o/o 34Yo 29o/oHistory-Social Science


Generated by School Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page 11 of 15

School Accountability Report GardPublished During 2013-14Reported for School Year 2012-13

Pêrcêntag€ of Student¡ Scorlng At Proflclent or Advanced

Sclencp l{letory-Soclal SclenceEngllrh-Language Art¡ Mathemaüc¡Group37o/o 29o/o360/o 38o/oAll Studsnt¡ ln the LEA

3',lo/o37o/o 42o/oAll Student¡ at the School

260/o33o/o 42o/oMale

360/041o/o 42o/oFemale

33Vo30o/o 39o/oBIack or Afrlcan Amerlcan

Amerlcan Indian or AlaskaNatlve

Aslan

Fllipino

43Yo 27o/oHlspanlc or Latlno 37o/o

Natlve Hawaiian or PacificIslander

42o/o35o/o 29o/oWh¡te

Two or More Races

41o/o 30o/oSocioeconomicallyDlsadvantaged

34Yo

34Yo 8o/oEnglish Leamers 23o/o

26YoSh¡dents with Disabilities 24o/o

67o/o 75o/oSh¡dents Receiving M¡grantEducation Seruices

Standardlzed Testlng and Reporting Results by Student Group - Most Recent Year

This table displays the percent of students, by group, achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceedingthe state stan for the most recent testing

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either becâuse the number of students in this category ¡s too small for stat¡stical

accuracy or to protecl student privecy.

California Physical Fitness Test Results (SchoolYear 2012'131

The California Physical Fitness Test (PFT) is administered to students in grades five, seven, and nine only. This_table

displays by gradalevel the percent of students meeting the fitness standards for the most recent testing period. Fordetailéd in?oimation regarding this test, and comparisons of a school's test results to the district and state, see the CDEP FT Web page at htto ://www. cde. ca. gov/taltg/ofl.

Percent of Students Meeting F¡tness Standards

Six of Six StandardsFour of Six Standards Five of Six Standa¡dsGrade Level

26.70Yo 12.90To 15.50o/o5

7

9

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested ¡s ten or less, either because the number of students ín th¡s category is too small for statistical

accuracy or to protect student privacy.


Generated by School Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/ 2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page 12 of 15

School Accountability Report GardPublished During 2013-1 4Reporled for School Year 2012-13

X. AccountabilityAcademlc Performance lndex

The Academic performance lndex (APl) is an annual measure of the academic performance and progress of sclools inCalpornia. Apl scores range from ZbO tó 1,000, with a statewide target of 800, Detailed information about the API can be

found at the API Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/talaclaol'

API Ranks - Three-Year ComParisonThis table displays the school's statewide and similar schools API ranks. The statewide API rank r?ng9s Jrom 1 to 10. A

statewide rank oi I means that the school has an API score in the lowest 10 percent of all schools in the state, while a

statewide rank of 10 means that the sc state' The

similar schools API rank reflects how a milar schools

rank of I means that the school's acad ls of the 100

similar schools, while a similar schools than at least

90 of the 100 similar schools,

API Performance lndex Growth by Student Group - Three-Year Compar¡son

This table displays by student group the actual API changes in points added or lost for the past three years, and the most

recent API score.

20L220Lt2010API Rank

211Statew¡de

412Similar Schools

School - Acü¡al API ChangeStateSchool District

10-11 rt-12 L2.L3GrowthAPI

Number ofStudents

Growth APINumber ofStudents

GrorrythAPI

Numberof

Students

Group

15 48 -32713 4,655,989 790720 2,329524AII Students at the School

664 296,463 708700 55382Black or African American

7434 30,3941American Indian or AlaskaNative

90624 897 406,5274Asian

86723 896 121,0547Filipino

-2274 6 401,437 721 2,438,951353 718Hispanic or latino

25,351 7743 Iilative Hawaiian or PacificIslander

29739 1,200,127 853ût 706 242Whit€

762 125,025 82410 37Two or More Races

52 402,774,640 743 20707 1,928 703443SocioeconomicallyDisadvantaged

44 -291,482,316 721 11913 706257 700English Learners

615212 538 527,47668 568Students with Disabilities

Note: "N/D, means that no data were ava¡leble to the CDE or LEA to reporl "B' means the school did not have a valid API Base end there is no

information "C' means lhe school had s¡gnificant demographic changes end there is no Grcwth or target information.Gro$rth or target


Generated by school Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/ 2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page 13 of 15

School Accountability Repoft CardPublished During 201 3-1 4Reported for School Year 2012-13

Adequate Yearly Progress

The federal NCLB Act requires that all schools and díEtric-ts meet the following Adequate Y!a4y Progress (AYP) criteria;. Participation rate on the state's standards-based assessments in Errglish-langu?ge arts (ELq) and mathematics. Perceñt proficient on the state's standards-based assessments in ELA and mathematics. API as an additional indicator. Graduation rate (for secondary schools)Detailed informatiòn about AYP, íncluding participation rates and percent proficient results by student group, can be

found at the AYP Web page htto://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/aclayl.

AYP Overall and by Criteria (SchoolYear 2012''l3lThis table displays an indication of whether the school and the district made AYP overall and whether the school and the

district met each of the AYP criteria.

Federal lntervention Program (School Year 2013'141

Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program lmprovement (Pl) if they do not make AYP for twoconsecutive years in the samé content area (Elá or mathematics) or on the same indicator (APl or graduation rate)'

After enterin! Pl, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not

make AYP. For detailed information about Pl identification, see the CDE Pl Status Determinations Web page:

D¡str¡ctSchoolAYP Criterla

NONoOverall

YesYesPardclpaüon Rate - Engllsh-Language Arts

YesYesParüclpation Rate - MathemaËcs

No NOPercent Proficient - Engllsh'Language Arts

No NoPercent Proficlent - Mathematics

No NoAPI

nla nlaGraduation Rate

D¡strictSchoolIndicator

ln Plln PlProgram Improvement Stahrs

2003-200ø. 20cø,-2005First Year of Program Imprcvement

Year 5 Year 3Year in Prcgram Improvement

4Number of Schools Cunenüy in Program Improvement

100.0o/oPercent of Schools Currenüy ¡n Program Improvement


Generated by School lnnovations & Achievement on 5/23/ 2O14 1O:11:26 AM Page 14 of 15

School Accountability Report GardPublished During 2013-1 4Reporled for School Year 2012-13

Xl. lnstructional Planning and SchedulingProfessional DevelopmentThís section provides information on how teachers and staff are trained for instructional improvement,

Eastside Elementary School will focus on increasing student achievement by addressing the needs of the studentsthrough professional development activities offered throughout the school year, Training will occur during the schoolwith substitutes provided to the teacher. Professional development occurs in the areas of writing, data analaysis,curriculum development and any other topics that are deemed needed by the staff or administration,

Leadership teams and admínistration at Eastside Elementary School work throughout the year on improvinginstructional proSgram, striving to improve upon the quality education already provided. All aspecls of standardcurriculum and instruction are aligned wíth state content standards in order to provide students with the mostcomprehensive educational experience possible.

Teaching concepts are supported by a variety of conferences and workshops throughout the year, after whichparticipating teachers can share information with colleagues. Textbook companies also arrange for training whennew textbooks or materials are approved to support the adoption,

Professional Development DaysThis table displays information on the annual number of school days dedicated to staff development for the most recentthree-year period

InsFuctlonal Days per School Year

2010-11 2OLL.L2 2012-L3

0 5Annual number of school days dedicated to stafr development


Generated by School Innovations & Achievement on 5/23/2014 LOTLL:26 AM Page 15 of 15

Documents

School Accountability Report...School Accountability Report Card Reported for School Year 2012-13 Published During 2013-14 i + * * I + Eastside Elementary School EùtiJr ti rñn.æ