Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SECARB Phase III – Early Test, Cranfield, MS
GCCC Digital Publication Series #09-04
Susan D. Hovorka Timothy A. Meckel Ramón H. Treviño
J. –P. Nicot Jong-Won Choi
Changbing Yang Jeff Paine
Katherine Romanak Jiemin Lu
Hongliu Zeng Masoumeh Kordi
Cited as: Hovorka, S. D., Meckel, T. A., Treviño, R. H., Nicot, J. –P., Choi, J. –W., Yang, C., Paine, J., Romanak, K., Lu, J., Zeng, H., and Kordi, M., SECARB Phase III – Early Test, Cranfield, MS: presented at the Southern States Energy Board Stakeholders’ Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, March 3, 2009. GCCC Digital Publication #09-04.
Keywords: Field study-Cranfield-MS; Monitoring tracers; Monitoring-cross-well seismic; Monitoring-groundwater-USDW; Monitoring-soil gas; Monitoring-wireline logs
SECARB PHASE IIIEARLY TEST
CRANFIELD, MS
Susan D. Hovorka, Timothy A. Meckel, Ramon H. Trevino, J.P. Nicot, Jong-Won Choi,
Changbing Yang, Jeff Paine, Katherine Romanak,Jiemin Lu, Hongliu Zeng, Masoumeh Kordi
Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The
University of Texas at Austin
Management of SECARBManagement of SECARB Early TestEarly Test Gulf Coast Gulf Coast Carbon CenterCarbon Center
Denbury Resources Inc
University of Texasat Austin
DRI
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Sandia Technologies LLC
SECARB coal seam testsGeological Survey of AlabamaVirginia Tech
SECARB Power Plant testsEPRISouthern CoARI
Other SECARB tests
LBNL LLBL USGSORNL EPA QEA
U Mississippi Miss State
Overview
• Background Information
• Phase III Design
• Summary
Cranfield
Source of large volumes ofCO2 via pipeline
Source: Dutton and others 1993
Upper Cretaceous TuscaloosaUpper Cretaceous Tuscaloosa--Woodbine Trend Woodbine Trend ––Cranfield in Mississippi Salt BasinCranfield in Mississippi Salt Basin
Phase 3: $36M, 2 observation wells, multiple injectors, 1 Mt/yr
Gulf Coast Stacked Storage Field Test
Tuscaloosa Formation:Cranfield, MS
Natchez, MS
MS River
Cranfield unit boundary
Oil ring
Gas cap
Sonat CO2 pipelinefrom natural sourceJackson Dome
Denburyearly injectors Saline aquifer
within Cranfield unit
SECARB (Early) Phase III Field Test
Phase II study areaDedicated observationWell; + logging in producers
Phase III study areaTwo dedicated observation wells in brine + in producers
1+ MMT/year
Brine
ResidualOil
ResidualGas
Tusc
aloo
sa F
orm
atio
n
10,000 ft
Regional
seal
DenburyCranfield unit
A A’
A
Cranfield Geometric OverviewCranfield Geometric OverviewA’
Phase II Study area
Monitor
Monitor
InjectorProdu-cer
2x Normal
Phase IIIEarly study area
Injector
Monitors
Phase III Design• Two Observation Wells
– CASSM – X-well tomography – ERT – Joint inversion (saturation, sweep efficiency) – Fluid sampling (U-tube)– Thermal response– Whole cores / core analyses
• Geomechanical Test – Paired Injection / Production– Downhole Microseismic & Tilt – In-zone / out-of-zone activity: pressure and fluid migration
• Far-Field Measurements– RST– BHP– BHT
Cranfield Anticline
~ 1 mile
W-E
S-N
29-12
OBS
Characterization
DAS
A B
DAS
Geomechanical Test
Intersection of OWC withtop of injection interval
Horizontal time slice with amplitude (2272 ms)
A
B
Deep water table 0
38.5
60
8691
218
218
Scientific and Technical Objectives &Benefits
Objective
(1) Sweep efficiency brine system
(2) Novel effort to account for volume and energy input
(3) Leakage though 1945 wells?Assess effectiveness of surface
monitoring in a deep water table
Anticipated Benefit
• Well-quantified measure of how CO2 occupies pore volumes
• Add rigor to pressure measurement for storage prediction
• Challenge these technologies -Reliable leakage detection?
Planned Phase III Observation “Smart Well” Construction
Fiberglass non-conductive casing
Tuscaloosa DE
ERT – 20 electrodes
Casing-conveyed pressure sensor
100’
200’
U-tube sampler1/4 “SS
2 7/8” tubing
BHP+ T
Seismic sources/receivers
Distributed temperature
BEG, LBNL, LLNL, USGS, ORNL, Pinnacle, QEA, Sandia Technologies
Cross well array in two wellsHigh injection volumesFar-field monitoring – tilt, microseismic, P&T, chemistry, surface seismic
Planned Subsurface Measurements
70 m 30 m
CFU28-F1 Obs 1 Obs 2
180 m
Phase III Summary
Currently Mid-May / Observation Well #1• Down-Dip Brine Injection• Intensive Monitoring Campaign
– Cross well– Geomechanical– Far Field
Injection and monitoringSite
developmentCharacterization
Progress2007
Site
sel
ectio
n
2008 2009
NEPACX
Firstcored well,brine samples
Received seismic data
Startworkover
Soil gasbaseline
Instrument-ation
Increasing number of injectorsand rate per well
End
phas
e II
Start Phase III injection
2006
Phase IIIWells May
Phase II EORPhase III Brine
Cranfield Mississippi
CFU 29-12: New Injector10-5100105
Permeability to air (md)
10 20 30Porosity (%)
-150-100-50
SP (mV)
40 60 80 100 120
10,270
10,280
10,290
10,300
10,310
10,320
10,330
10,340
Gamma Ray (API)
DE
PTH
(ft)
AverageH: 283 mdV: 47 md
AverageH: 20.5 %V: 20.7 %
INJE
CTI
ON
ZO
NE
Data provided by DRI
Core Box 1
Bottom
Top
Sharp Basal Contact
Chert Pebble Conglomerate
Marine Mudstone
Shell fragments (oyster,gastropod) and Trace fossils
Lower Shoreface
Braided Stream
Gakona – Copper River Junction, AlaskaModern Analog – Braided Stream
http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/ritter/glossary/a_d/braided_streams.html
USGS Digital Data Series DDS-21
CFU 29-12: New Injector10-5100105
Permeability to air (md)
10 20 30Porosity (%)
-150-100-50
SP (mV)
40 60 80 100 120
10,270
10,280
10,290
10,300
10,310
10,320
10,330
10,340
Gamma Ray (API)
DE
PTH
(ft)
AverageH: 283 mdV: 47 md
AverageH: 20.5 %V: 20.7 %
INJE
CTI
ON
ZO
NE
Data provided by DRI
Fluvial Depositional EnvironmentStratal slicing seismic interpretation
ChannelChannelerosionerosion
ChannelChannelerosionerosion
ChannelChannelerosionerosion
Point barPoint bar Point barPoint bar
ChannelChannelerosionerosion
Galloway 1983
Meander fluvial modelHongliu Zeng
Role of Dissolution in Plume and Pressure Evolution
No dissolution: volume displaced =Volume injected
Volume displaced =Volume injected – volume dissolved + fluid expansion
In miscible CO2 EOR, a large amount of CO2 is dissolved in oil – CO2 migration is retarded compared to brine, where dissolution is much less.
5 10 15
res
Ohm-m-150-100 -50 09,700
9,800
9,900
10,000
10,100
10,200
10,300
sp
mVD
EPTH
(ft)
10-3/4" casing set @ 1,825'
16" casing set @ 222'
13-Chrome Isolation packer w/ feed through13-Chrome Selective seat nipple
Side Pocket Mandrel w/dummy gas valvePressure transducer1/4" tubing installed between packers toProvide a conduit between isolation packers
13-Chrome Production packer w/ feed thrusTuscaloosaperforation
7" casing set @ 10,305'
Monitoring Zone
CO2 Injection Zone
Side Pocket Mandrel w/dummy gas valvePressure transducer
Test adequacy of Mississippi well completions for CO2sequestration
Con
finin
g sy
stem
Preparation of the Observation Wells (and outreach)
-5
0
Tubi
ng P
ress
ure
(psi
g)
Tubing data
100
150
Tbi
Tt
(F)
Real-time monitoring via Satellite Uplink
Well head tubing and barometric pressure at surface
Phase III: Theoretical Approaches Through CommercializationTh
eory
and
lab
Fiel
d ex
perim
ents
Hyp
othe
sis
test
ed
Commercial Deployment by Southern Co.
CO2 retained in-zone-document no leakage to air-no damage to water
CO2 saturation correctly predicted by flow
modeling
Pressure (flow plus deformation)
correctly predicted by model
Above-zone acoustic monitoring (CASSM) & pressure monitoring
Contingency planParsimonious public
assurance monitoringTow
ard
com
mer
cia-
lizat
ion
Surface monitoring: instrument verificationGroundwater programCO2 variation over time
Subsurface perturbation predicted
Sensitivity of tools; saturated-vadose
modeling of flux and tracers
CO2 saturation measured through time – acoustic
impedance + conductivityTomography and change
through time
Tilt, microcosmic, pressure mapping
3- D time lapse surface/ VSP seismic
Acoustic response to pressure change over
time
Dissolution and saturation measured via tracer breakthrough and chromatography
Lab-based core response to EM and acoustic under various saturations, tracer
behavior
Advanced simulation of reservoir pressure field
Modeled December Distribution of CO2
Middle lower Tuscaloosa (model layer 11)GEM compositional simulator Jong-wan Choi and JP Nicot, BEG
N
Observation well
Regional Stratigraphy of the Regional Stratigraphy of the Tuscaloosa FormationTuscaloosa Formation
Injection intervalSeal
Above-zone Monitoring interval
Secondary seals
Southeast Regional Carbon Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration partnership Sequestration partnership
““SECARBSECARB”” test test Cranfield Unit operated by Denbury Resources IncCranfield Unit operated by Denbury Resources Inc
Natchez Mississippi
Mississippi River
3,000 m depth Tuscaloosa FmGas cap, oil ring, downdip water legShut in since 1965Strong water driveReturned to near initial pressure
DAS
Geomechanical Test
DAS
Geomechanical Test