Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal

8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal

1/11

Central Information Commission,II,Floor,August Kranti bhavan, Bhikaji Kama Place

New Delhi- 110 067.

Madam/Sir,Re: Second Appeal under under Sec 19(3)of the Right to Information Act-2005

Name and address of the appellant: ShriGopal Soni, ([email protected])

(Tel.01452644106) C231,PanchSheel Nagar,Ajmer-305 004.

Name and address of the CPIO: Pranab Kumar Sahu,,Chief MANAGER & CPIO,New India Assurance Co. Ltd,{NIACL},87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001.E-mail:

Name and address of the Central Public Authorityagainst the order of whom the appeal is

preferred: Renjit Gangadharan,Dy General Manager,New India Assurance Co.Ltd,{NIACL},87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001.

Particulars of the order against which the appeal is preferred:

HO Appeal No. 207/2013 dated 29.11.2013 ( annexure A4 )

Compensation Sought: The appellant prays for compensation as per clause in Sec 19(8)* of

the RTI Act to the detriment suffered because of prolonged denial of information

Brief facts leading to the appeal:The appellant ,an honest citizen of India sought information under RTI dated 2.08.2013( A1)pertaining to denial/forefeiture of Provident Fund (own contribution) on behalf of NIACL and the

officials involved in prolonged denial of P F. The NIACL CPIO submitted a rhetorically drafted

annexure suppressing the desired information .The appellant, vide appeal dt.30.09.2013

requested disclosure of information to FAA . However, the said Renjeet

Gangadharn who abused needless public money by air travel to CIC on 20th

May 2013 instead

of attending prescribed mode video conference from Mumbai tried to justify the reply of CPIO

Prayer or Relief sought: 1. The information pertains to Right to Life of the applicant, who suffers

as he does not compromise with dishonesty. kindly order for immediate disclosure of information.2. That obstruction to information be viewed seriously and responsible official be penalized under

Section 20 (10) of the Act.

Compensation Sought: The appellant prays for compensation as per clause in Sec 19(8)* of

the RTI Act related to the detriment suffered since long denial of information.

Grounds for the Prayer or Relief: 1.The RTI officials of the public authority argue like advocates

instead of application of mind.2. There is no attempt to ensure humanitarian disclosure of information either by CIPO or FAA

3. Vigilance pledge has been ignored by both CPIO and FAA WE, THE PUBLICSERVANTS OF INDIA, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY PLEDGE THAT WE SHALL CONTINUOUSLYSTRIVE TO BRING ABOUT INTEGRITY AND TRANSPARENCY without fear or favour.Whether 2 sets of appeal attached:Yes


2/11

11.12.13 Second appeal RTI 2.8.13 vitt NIACL PFrev ribhav2 Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:54 PM

To: "segar.sampath" , "renjeet.gangadharan", "pranabkumar.sahu"

CPIO/FAA/Transparency OfficerNew India Assurance Co. Ltd,

87,M.G. road,Fort,MUMBAI-400001.Dear Sir,

Being an honest citizen of India who has not compromised with corruption in public lifeprevalent in the NIACL,I continue to be denied of every one of my constitutional and

humanitarian rights including my own Provident Fund.Please find attached copy of second appeal (RTI act).

regards,Shri Gopal Soni

C231,Panchsheel Nagar,AJMER-305004

A 6 Email: to [email protected] Kumar Sahu,,Chief MANAGER & CPIO,New India Assurance Co Ltd,

( NIACL),87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001

Madam/Sir,

Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005With reference to My application under the R.T.I.Act

2.8.2013 reply by you CPI/Ho/2013-14/189 suppressing the information

the applicant herewith files second appeal* against denial ofinformation by you as the CPIO and against the decision of

appellate authority under Appeal No.107/2013 that CPIO reply wasenough .Kindly be informed as above.

Shri Gopal Soni,C231,Panch Sheel Nagar,Ajmer -305004.(appellant)Enclosed: as above * Dt.11-12-2013

A7 Email: to [email protected] Gangadharan,Dy General Manager,New India Assurance Co Ltd, ( NIACL),

87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001

Dear Sir,Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005


3/11


4/11


5/11


6/11

Appellate Authority (RTI) 30.09.2013

New India Assurance Co. Ltd,87,M.G. Road, Fort,

Mumbai-400001.

Re: Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005 application2.08.2013

Incomplete and mischievous reply of insurance company CPIO under CPI

cell/HO/2013-14/189 dated 03.09.2013*

Appeal:

The CPIO ,NIACL furnished an evasive, distorted and mischievousreply consisting of two pages.

The applicant submits that he has been denied of his own Provident

Fund which amounts to forefeiture of his provident fund.

The Head Office of the insurance company is bound to supply a

speaking order to justify denial /forefeiture of the provident fund(own contribution ) of the applicant.The appellant has never authorized any NIACL official to deduct from

his Provident Fund a single rupee without his explicit consent.

The CPIO,be ordered to supply the complete,correct and transparent

information of denial /forefeiture/deduction of provident fund of theapplicant including the details of officials responsible for illegal and

inhuman act.

That all information is essential to right to life of a hapeless citizen of India,

Yours sincerely,

Shri Gopal Soni, (appellant) [email protected]

C231, Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004 Tel.01452644106.*enclosed with annexure


7/11


8/11


9/11

Joint Secretary (Insurance ) 2.08.2013

Ministry of Finance,Deptt. of Financial Services

Room No. 3, Jeevan Deep Building

Parliament Street, New Delhi - 110 001

Sir, Re: Information under the RTI Act-2005

With reference to the above,the applicant is depositing the prescribed fee

*attached herewith.

1. The applicant seeks copy of his RTI application dated 15th

May 2013

that was forwarded by Ministry vide letter dated 3.06.2013 under F. No.

M-18011/45/2013-Ins.1

2. The applicant,being denied of his own provident fund to cause his death

as a poor man,in collusion by New India Assurance Company Ltd,high

ranking officials,seeks information of all rules,regulations under whichthe insurance company reserves right to forefeit* the provident fund of

an employee

3. Name and designation of all New India Assurance Company officials

who either individually or collectively ordered forefeiture* of

applicants provident fund.

*alternatively called deduction euphemistically

The cumulative effect is that those employees get relief who gratify the greed

of corrupt officials and the innocent ones suffer for years like the applicant

whisle- blower victimized on the charge of leaving HQ in retaliation of his

commitment for honesty and transparency in publif life as an RTI applicant.

Yours Sincerely,(SHRI GOPAL SONI),

C231,PANCHSHEEL NAGAR,

AJMER-305004. Tel.0145-2644106

Thanking You. enc.: IPO NO.17F 399482

Annexure: i fj fk V


10/11

pfu nk tulsod dhlwfp

Hk`k~Vkpkj dfrfeyhHkxr dk joS;k

fjdkMZ dvuqlkjxEHkhj dnkpkj

orZeku fLFkfr

1 osruekUd28470

fuyEcu ugh fd;kx;k t;iqj uxjesgh ek= ,dfdyehVj LFkkukUrj.k

fjor dlkFk jUxsgkFkidMk x;k 10Qjojh2009 d

R; QV lfgr lekpkj i= esdkfkr gus d ckotwn iwjk

osru ] yxkrkj osru of) dlkFk leLr ifjykHk tuojh2011 rd fn, x,-

2 osruekUd

22828

lh ch vk fjdkMZ eslfUnX/k d ckotwnekunkj deZpkfj;d ihNs/kdy rhuckj inUur

yxHkx 50 gtkj dhudn vekur jkfkxk;c ik x

orZeku kk[kk dk;kZy;Hkkjh

RC 26(A)1991 drgrCBI }kjk estj isuYVhvuqkklfud dk;Zokgh gsrq lh chvk lykg d njfdukj djpsrkouh ek= lsvipkfjdrkiwjh

3.osruekUd

26019

fjor [kjh dj.kesjUxsgkFk iDMs tkusdipkr Hkh t;iqjftyses tu lsod

Hk`Vkpkj fuokj.k C;wj}kjk tuojh 2003 esidMk x;k20 tqyk 2012 d, vkj lsdj]

rRdkyhu dk;ZdkjhdEiuh ps;j esu d

lkFk ns[kk x;k-

yxHkx 48 gtkj :i, ekfldosru dlkFk leLr ifjykHkLohr

ipkr inUufr dk volj

fn;k x;k

4,

osruekUd

13559

QtokMs dV gusd17 okZ ipkr Hkhuk r fuyfEcr gS ukgh c[kkZLr

lh ch vk ,Q vk vkj6-08-1996 dvuqlkj5-96 yk[k dk chek/k[kk/kMh

56 gtkj :i, ekfld osrut;iqj estulsod tgkQt nLrkost fn-27-07-93 disk fd;k


11/11

Documents

Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal