21
SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE

SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT

by

Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

Page 2: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

SOIL DEGRADATION = SOIL LOSS

- as solid material = erosion by water and wind (on erosion, there exists an enormous amount of literature)

- as soluble matter = leaching

Page 3: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 4: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

EROSION THROUGH WATER AND WIND ARE DIFFERENT PROCESSES

IN PRINCIPLE, THREE STEPS CAN BE DISTINGUISHED:

- MOBILISATION

- TRANSPORT

- DEPOSITION

Page 5: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

- HYDRATATION

- HYDROLYSIS = PROTOLYSIS

- OXIDATION

- COMPLEXATION

IN THREE STEPS:

- SOLUBILISATION

-TRANSPORT

- PRECIPITATION AND FIXATION

LEACHING OCCURS THROUGH DIFFERENT PHYSICO-CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES:

Page 6: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

WATER EROSION:

USLE = Universal Soil Loss Equation

A = R . K . L . S . C . P

A = soil loss ( g.m-2; t.ha-1)

R = rainfall erosivity (kinetic energy of rain)

K = soil erodibility (texture, structure etc.)

L = length of the slope

S = slope degree (inclination)

C = influence of land use (type of agriculture, forestry etc.

P = measures against erosion (e.g. terracing, countour stripping etc.

Page 7: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

FORMS OF EROSION:- sheet erosion- rill erosion- gully erosion- tunnel erosion- harvest erosion (see pictures)

Page 8: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 9: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 10: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 11: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 12: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 13: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 14: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

MEASUREMENT OF SOIL DEGRADATION

- Recent (actual) erosion Measurement on erosion plots (on site) Hydrological measurements in small watersheds by gaugesProblems:

- not all eroded soil material reaches the waterways, but is deposited close to the erosion site;- extrapolation of results from some m² to large areas is difficult or impossible;- because soil formation is a process of thousands of years, as well as soil degradation, actual measurements are not very indicative for long time periods

Page 15: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 16: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 17: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 18: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

- HISTORICAL (PAST) EROSIONmight have been quite different to the actual one, because of different climate conditions (climate variations in historical times):

- topomorphic approaches: measurement of lake sediments or sediments deposited downhill in lower slope positions or in alluvial plains;- measurement of isotopes;- luminescence measurements;- time markers, such as volcanic depositions of known age in sediment layers;

Exact results are in general difficult to obtain.

- RESULTS OF LEACHING PROCESSESmass balances based on known processes, e.g. limestone weathering and deposition of calcrete

Page 19: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva
Page 20: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

Estimations (assessment) of soil degradation by erosion and leaching are based on models, extrapolating local results of measurements onto larger areas, taking into consideration factors such as climatic influence, landscape, soil type, vegetation cover, land use and others(see USLE).There are some dozen models available for different physio-geographic regions of the world.

Page 21: SOIL DEGRADATION WITHIN THE SOILCRITZONE CONCEPT by Winfried E.H. Blum and Svetla Rousseva

CONCLUSIONS

1. Soil degradation is causing loss of soil material, counterbalancing soil formation through weathering of rock parent material;

2. Soil losses occur in solid (erosion) and liquid (leaching) form;3. Soil losses on one site mean at the same time deposition of

the lost material on other sites- through aquatic/hydraulic transport and deposition;- through wind transport and deposition;- through precipitation after mobilisation and leaching;

4. Land and soil surfaces without protective vegetation cover like deserts were always sources of soil material, whereas others were sinks, gaining soil material, see e.g. Sahara dust in South and North America