Upload
duongdieu
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Australia and EuropePartnerships for Sustainable Energy R&D
Solar Thermal Developments in Australia
Wesley Stein
Sponsored by The Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (ATSE) and
CSIRO, Australia's National R&D organisation.
30 June 2002
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
DriversDriversDriversDrivers
• Renewable and sustainable energy incentives
• Solar is pure green• Abundance of solar energy resource• Compatibility with both existing and
advanced energy technologies• Distributed or large scale centralised• New investment opportunity
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Australia’s Mandatory Australia’s Mandatory Australia’s Mandatory Australia’s Mandatory Renewable Energy TargetRenewable Energy TargetRenewable Energy TargetRenewable Energy Target
• 9500GWh/yr of renewable energy required by 2010
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Year
GW
h
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Australia’s Mandatory Australia’s Mandatory Australia’s Mandatory Australia’s Mandatory Renewable Energy TargetRenewable Energy TargetRenewable Energy TargetRenewable Energy Target
• 9500GWh/yr of renewable energy required by 2010
• Liability on electricity retailers• Certificate trading system• $40/MWh penalty for non-compliance
11001400
1950
1700
1950
1700
1400
1100
2200
2200
1950 1950
1950
1950
1950
17001700
170019502200
2200
2200
2200
Solar Global Radiation > 2200 kWh/m²a very good qualified
Qualification for Solar Electricity Generation
Solar Global Radiation > 1950 kWh/m²a good qualified
Global Solar Radiation
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Solar thermal technologiesSolar thermal technologiesSolar thermal technologiesSolar thermal technologies
• Solar hot water• Solar tower• Solar ponds• Solar-assisted chilling• Solar steam/ Rankine cycle• Solar dish - Stirling or Brayton cycle• Central Receivers• Solar reforming or dissociation
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Solar thermal/biomass Solar thermal/biomass Solar thermal/biomass Solar thermal/biomass hybridshybridshybridshybrids
• Bioenergy and solar thermal both utilise the same thermodynamic cycles
• Each fuel offers advantages to the other• Solar unlimited, biomass low cost
(sometimes)• No exotic material breakthroughs
required• Transitional
Solar Tower ProjectSolar Tower Project
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
ENERGY LOSSES UNDER TYPICAL OPERATION at 475degC, 900W/m2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Inso
latio
n
Inte
rcep
ted
by re
c
Stea
m p
rodu
ced
@re
c
Del
iver
ed a
t LR
J
Del
iver
ed a
t Eng
ine
Gro
ss e
ngin
e ou
tput
Net
eng
ine
outp
ut
kW
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Perc
enta
ge
Energy, kWPercentage
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 100 200 300 400
Solar direct radiation into dish aperture, kW
Ther
mal
pow
er o
utpu
t, kW
th
Measured data, 480oC
Model data for improved dish
SOLAR COLLECTOR PERFORMANCE DATA
Wesley Stein, March 2000
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
The Dish and CollectorThe Dish and CollectorThe Dish and CollectorThe Dish and Collector
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
MultiMultiMultiMulti----tower solar arraytower solar arraytower solar arraytower solar array(University of Sydney)(University of Sydney)(University of Sydney)(University of Sydney)
ReceiverInsolationReceiver
Reflector orientation patterns set up to allow avoidance of blocking of reflected radiation under close packing. This diagram applies schematically to the MTSA along two axes. Courtesy of Philippe Schramek and David Mills.
CARNOT CYCLE EFFICIENCY AND SOLAR CONCENTRATION RATIO
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200Temperature, deg C
Car
notc
ycle
effi
cien
cy
10
100
1000
10000
Sola
r con
cent
ratio
n ra
tio,A
a/Ar
1
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Gas Turbine
Steam Turbine
Condenser
Solar Field
SolarSteamGenerator
Fuel
Heat RecoverySteam Generator
Stack
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
% heat transferred
Tem
pera
ture
, o C
Single pressure
Dual pressure
Infinite pressure stages (evaporation external to HRB)
Flue gas profile
20%
22%
24%
26%
28%
30%
32%
34%
36%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
% of peak solar steam input
Inte
rnal
and
ove
rall
stea
m
cycl
e ef
ficie
ncy
73%
74%
75%
76%
77%
78%
79%
80%
81%
82%
HRB
effic
ienc
y
Internal steam cycle efficiency* Overall steam cycle efficiency*HRB efficiency
Solar topping/ solar evaporation performance with increasing solar input
Wesley Stein, March 2000
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Process heat
Organic Rankine cycle
Chiller
Reverse cycle air conditioning
Electricity
CO/TRI-GENERATION FOR DISTRIBUTED ENERGY APPLICATIONS
Solar gas or Solar HTFpreheated air
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
ThermochemicalThermochemical Energy Energy StorageStorage
NH3 + 66.8kJ/mol 1/2N2 + 3/2H2
H2 / N2gas
liquidNH3
Heat Exchangers
Power Generation(Steam Cycle)
Ammonia Synthesis(Exothermic Reactor)
Ammonia Dissociation(Endothermic Reactor)
Separation and Storage
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Towards Sustainable Towards Sustainable Towards Sustainable Towards Sustainable Energy Energy Energy Energy –––– CSIRO solar CSIRO solar CSIRO solar CSIRO solar reformingreformingreformingreforming
• Aim: demonstrate a solar thermal –fossil energy hybrid concept for high efficiency / low CO2 power generation and appropriate for Australian conditions
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Project DriversProject DriversProject DriversProject Drivers• Deregulation of electricity and gas supply industries
• Move towards smaller-scale power generation based on gas
• By 2010 an additional 9,500 GWh pa to be sourced from newrenewable energy
• Introduction of renewable energy accreditation schemes by which electricity generated from renewable sources attracts a premium
• Legislation requiring distributors to sell electricity with reduced Greenhouse gas emissions
• Need for Greenhouse gas mitigation strategies to go beyond more efficient fossil energy technologies and fuel substitution
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Project DriversProject DriversProject DriversProject Drivers (cont.)(cont.)(cont.)(cont.)• No exotic material breakthroughs required
• Thermal and chemical processes well understood
• Simple integration with existing thermodynamic cycles and energyprocesses
• Coincidence of high levels of solar and gas
• Storage of solar energy in chemical form
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Operational Modes / Operational Modes / Operational Modes / Operational Modes / Products 1Products 1Products 1Products 1• Green syngas for electricity generation• Production of synthesis gas as precursor
for gas-to-liquids production (potential “bottled sunshine”)
• Closed loop heat generation (methanation) (zero GHG emission)
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
The ConceptThe ConceptThe ConceptThe Concept
Fossil Fuel (CH4)
Water
water
CO/H2/CO2 H2/CO2 H2 - fuel
CO2 to disposal / sequestration
• Fuel cells• Gas turbines• Cogeneration etc
CH4 + H2O(l l l l ) + 250 KJ CO + 3H2
CO + H2O(l l l l ) H2 + CO2 + 3 KJ
Solar Thermal
Fuel Reforming
Solar Thermal
Water GasShift
Conversion
CO2Recovery
Advanced Power
Generation~
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Operational Modes / Operational Modes / Operational Modes / Operational Modes / Products 2Products 2Products 2Products 2• Hydrogen production with CO2
capture/sequestration• Fuel cell electricity generation from
hydrogen• Hydrogen for refining of heavier crude
oils
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
The ConceptThe ConceptThe ConceptThe Concept
Fossil Fuel (CH4)
Water
water
CO/H2/CO2 H2/CO2 H2 - fuel
CO2 to disposal / sequestration
• Fuel cells• Gas turbines• Cogeneration etc
CH4 + H2O(l l l l ) + 250 KJ CO + 3H2
CO + H2O(l l l l ) H2 + CO2 + 3 KJ
Solar Thermal
Fuel Reforming
Solar Thermal
Water GasShift
Conversion
CO2Recovery
Advanced Power
Generation~
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
The CSIRO Demonstration The CSIRO Demonstration The CSIRO Demonstration The CSIRO Demonstration FacilityFacilityFacilityFacility
• A 107m2 twin axis tracking solar dish
• Catalytic gas reforming reactors
• Receiver and flux modifier at focal point
• Absorption-based H2/CO2 separation units
• A 10 kWe polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (unavailable)
• Complete integrated operation has been successfully demonstrated - H2 has CO levels low enough for PEM fuel cell operation
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
The Dish and CollectorThe Dish and CollectorThe Dish and CollectorThe Dish and Collector
CSIRO MARK 2 SOLAR REFORMERWATER
PRODUCTGAS
NATURAL GAS / CO2
SOLAR ENERGY
112 MIRROR PANELS48 ACTIVE MIRRORS
43.2kW (900W/m2) INCIDENT ON MIRROR SURFACE AREA
40.6kW REFLECTED FROM 48 ACTIVE MIRRORS
94% DISH REFLECTIVITY
8.6kW LOST BY ABSORPTIONOR RERADIATION
32.0kW USEDFOR REFORMING
SS20TDISH
FEEDNATURAL GAS(95.7kW HHV)
PRODUCT GAS(120.2kW HHV)
11.9 kW RECOVERED IN PRODUCT GASTHROUGH WATER PREHEATING
FEEDWATER
7.5kW LOST TO STEAMAND SENSIBLE HEAT IN PRODUCT GAS
PREDICTED THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF CSIRO MARK II SOLAR REFORMER WITH 900W/M2 DIRECT SOLAR ENERGY
Methane conversion @ 850C, 1MPa and steam-to-methane molar ratio of 2.5 = 87.1%Solar-to-chemical energy conversion (HHV)= 60.3%Increase in chemical energy of feed natural gas (HHV) = 25.6%
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Future Plans & Outlook for Future Plans & Outlook for Future Plans & Outlook for Future Plans & Outlook for CSIRO solar reformingCSIRO solar reformingCSIRO solar reformingCSIRO solar reforming• Commercial prospects being evaluated
• Demonstration facility establishing proof of concept being pursued
• Appropriate solar concentrator is required
• Industrial partners being sought to move into a commercial implementation phase
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19Equivalent gas price, $/GJ
Tota
l ins
talle
d co
st o
f sol
ar a
rray,
$/m
2(ap
ertu
re)
6000MJ/m2, 0% O&M
4000MJ/m2, 3% O&M
5000MJ/m2, 3% O&M
6000MJ/m2, 3% O&M
4000MJ/m2, 0% O&M
Estimated costs for Tennant Creek
25 yr life, 7% discount rateGas boiler avge efficiency = 83%0%/yr gas price escalation
5000MJ/m2, 0% O&M
Greenhouse gas emissions
12 21 15 18 1684
442
980
0
200
400
600
800
1000
SEGS Parabolic Trough
Dish/Stirling
PHOEBUS Power Tower
Solar Tower
Wind Turbine
Photovoltaics
Combined Cycle
Coal Plant (Australia Ø )G
reen
hous
e G
as e
mis
sion
s in
CO
2 eq
uiva
lent
s
[g/kWhel]
Source: Weinrebe, G.: ”Greenhouse Gas Mitigation with Solar Thermal Power Plants”, Proceedings of the PowerGen Europe 1999 Conference, Frankfurt, Germany, June 1-3
International International International International OpportunitiesOpportunitiesOpportunitiesOpportunities
ABENGOA
Solel
KfW FICHTNER
EEA/NREA
KJCSMA
World BankBECHTEL
ONE NEPCO
LOCATIONLOCATION TYPETYPE s olar MWs olar MWAus traliaAus tralia CLFRCLFR FresnelFres nel 1313CreteCrete SEGSSEGS TroughTrough 5252EgyptEgypt ISCCSISCCS TroughTrough 30-8030-80IndiaIndia ISCCSISCCS TroughTrough 3535IranIran ISCCS/SEGSISCCS/SEGS TroughTrough 30-8030-80JordanJordan PHOEBUSPHOEBUS TowerTower 3030MexicoMexico ISCCSISCCS TroughTrough 30-8030-80MoroccoMorocco ISCCS/SEGSISCCS/SEGS TroughTrough 30-8030-80SpainSpain SEGS, SP10SEGS, SP10 Trough,Tower Trough,Tower 10-5010-50USAUSA SEGSSEGS TroughTrough 354354
BOEING DukeSolarGamesa
Ghersa
AGOESTIAEuropean Solar Thermal Power Industry Association
Slide courtesy of:
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Where to from here?Where to from here?Where to from here?Where to from here?
• A number of technology types opening up many different opportunities.
• Major hurdle at present is capital cost of the collector / concentrator.
• Apart from mirrors, manufacturing and civil works similar to wind turbines so could follow same cost reduction curve.
• Opportunity to link the best technologies of Europe and Australia to produce flexible solar thermal driven packages that can be customised for specific applications.
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Required stepsRequired stepsRequired stepsRequired steps
• Demonstration plants at pre-commercial level are critical. Problem-free operation is possibly more crucial to technology confidence than cost at this time.
• Such plants should be installed in hybrid configurations (with reliable back-up fuel such as gas) and in parallel so that seamless operation can be demonstrated
• They should operate in a commercial environment (whether or not they are producing commercially-competitive energy) so that real experience is gained and investors see real solutions emerging
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Collaborative opportunitiesCollaborative opportunitiesCollaborative opportunitiesCollaborative opportunities• Alliance with European partners sought
for various aspects• Collaboration could be:
– Technical R&D– Modelling– Product development– Product demonstration and testing
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Collaborative opportunitiesCollaborative opportunitiesCollaborative opportunitiesCollaborative opportunities• Some immediate areas of interest:
– Solar/gas hybrid Brayton cycle– Solar thermal supplementation of distributed
generation plants, especially cogen and trigen– Solar steam Rankine cycle integration– Solar reformed methane– Solar biomass hybrids
• Work also required on associated equipment, for example:– Small heat engines utilising medium temperature
steam– Organic Rankine Cycles– Absorption cycle chilling
ENERGYENERGYENERGYENERGY TECHNOLOGY
THANK YOUTHANK YOUTHANK YOUTHANK YOU
Mark 2 Solar Cavity Receiver Predicted Performance (No dish louvers) with Reformer @ 850C & 1000kPa, LT WGS @215C, Solar Energy @43kW (900W/m2), Gas Engine Efficiency = 40% & Fuell Cell Efficiency = 60%
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50
Water-to-Methane Molar Ratio
Ove
rall
Sola
r-To-
Elec
trica
l Ene
rgy
Conv
ersi
on (L
HV),
%
0.0
15.0
30.0
45.0
60.0
Sola
r-To-
Chem
ical
Ene
rgy
conv
ersi
on (L
HV),
%
Overall Conversionwith Heat Recovery @300C,
LT WGS@215C & Fuel Cell Unit
Overall Conversionwith Heat Recovery@200C
& Gas Engine
CO2/CH4ratio
= 0
= 1.0= 0.5
Chemical energyconversion (LHV)reforming only
Chemical energyconversion (LHV)
with LT WGS
Mark 2 Solar Cavity Receiver Predicted Performance (No dish louvers) with Reformer @ 850C & 1000kPa, LT WGS @215C, Solar Energy @43kW (900W/m2), Gas Engine Efficiency = 40% & Fuell Cell Efficiency = 60%
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50
Water-to-Methane Molar Ratio
Ove
rall
Sola
r-To-
Elec
trica
l Ene
rgy
Conv
ersi
on,
%
10.0
35.0
60.0
85.0
110.0
Feed
nat
ural
gas
(LHV
), kW
Conversion with Heat Recovery @300C,LT WGS@215C & Fuel Cell Unit
Conversionwith Heat Recovery@200C
& Gas Engine
CO2/CH4ratio
= 0
= 1.0= 0.5
Feed natural gas (LHV)reforming only
Feed natural gas (LHV)with LT WGS
Mark 2 Solar Cavity Receiver Predicted Performance (No dish louvers) with Reformer @ 850C & 1000kPa, LT WGS @215C and Solar Energy @43kW (900W/m2)
10.0
20.0
30.0
1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50
Water-to-Methane Molar Ratio
Incr
ease
in c
hem
ical
ene
rgy
(LHV
), kW
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
Feed
nat
ural
gas
(LHV
), kW
Feed natural gas (LHV)reforming only
CO2/CH4ratio
= 0
= 1.0= 0.5
Increase in Chemical Energy (LHV) with Heat Recovery @300C,
LT WGS@215C & Fuel Cell Unit
Increase in Chemical Energy (LHV)with Heat Recovery@200C
& Gas Engine
Feed natural gas (LHV)with LT WGS
112 MIRROR PANELS48 ACTIVE MIRRORS
43.2kW (900W/m2) INCIDENT ON MIRROR SURFACE AREA
40.6kW REFLECTED FROM 48 ACTIVE MIRRORS
94% DISH REFLECTIVITY
8.6kW LOST BY ABSORPTIONOR RERADIATION
32.0kW USEDFOR REFORMING
SS20TDISH
FEEDNATURAL GAS(86.4kW LHV)
PRODUCT GAS(105.6kW LHV)
11.9 kW RECOVERED IN PRODUCT GASTHROUGH WATER PREHEATING
FEEDWATER
7.5kW LOST TO STEAMAND SENSIBLE HEAT IN PRODUCT GAS
PREDICTED THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF CSIRO MARK II SOLAR REFORMER WITH 900W/M2 DIRECT SOLAR ENERGY
Methane conversion @ 850C, 1MPa and steam-to-methane molar ratio of 2.5 = 87.1%Solar-to-chemical energy conversion (LHV) = 47.4%Increase in chemical energy of feed natural gas (LHV) = 22.3%