11
1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark [email protected] 2,4-D Glyphosate Pymetrozine Metsulfuron-methyl PCP So what do they have in common? Pirimicarb Some well known pesticides This was actually a question to the audience 2,4-D acid pK a at 3.0 Glyphosate acid pK a at 0.5, 2.6, 5.9, base pK a at 10 Pymetrozine base pK a at 3.8 Metsulfuron-methyl acid pK a at 4.1 PCP acid pK a at 4.5 All these pesticides are ionizable some are acids (rosa), some are bases (blue), some are both Pirimicarb base pK a at 4.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 pH Fractions neutral ion 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 pH Fractions neutral ion Metsulfuron-methyl acid, pKa = 4.41 Trimethoprim base, pKa = 7.2 Impact of pH on speciation of ionics (Weak) acids are ionic at high pH and bases at low pH ) ( 10 1 1 a pK pH i n f n i f f 1 and Processes for ionic compounds Ionic compounds undergo extra effects: Ionizable compounds dissociate. They occur in (at least) two species (neutral and ion). Concentration ratios of these species change with pH. Ions are much more polar than the neutral molecules. Membrane permeabilities of ions are small. Ions are attracted or repelled by electrical fields.

Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark [email protected] 2,4-D

  • Upload
    vanque

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

1

The Cell Model

Stefan Trapp

Department of Environmental Engineering

Technical University of Denmark

[email protected]

2,4-D

Glyphosate

Pymetrozine

Metsulfuron-methyl

PCP

So what do they have in common?

Pirimicarb

Some well known pesticides

This was actually a question to the audience 2,4-D

acid pKa at 3.0

Glyphosate

acid pKa at 0.5, 2.6, 5.9,

base pKa at 10 Pymetrozine

base pKa at 3.8

Metsulfuron-methyl

acid pKa at 4.1

PCP

acid pKa at 4.5

All these pesticides are ionizable

some are acids (rosa), some are bases (blue), some are both

Pirimicarb

base pKa at 4.5

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

pH

Fra

cti

on

s

neutral ion

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1 3 5 7 9 11 13

pH

Fra

cti

on

s

neutral ion

Metsulfuron-methyl

acid, pKa = 4.41

Trimethoprim

base, pKa = 7.2

Impact of pH on speciation of ionics

(Weak) acids are ionic at high pH and bases at low pH

)(101

1apKpHinf

ni ff 1and

Processes for ionic compounds

Ionic compounds undergo extra effects:

► Ionizable compounds dissociate.

► They occur in (at least) two species (neutral and ion).

► Concentration ratios of these species change with pH.

► Ions are much more polar than the neutral molecules.

► Membrane permeabilities of ions are small.

► Ions are attracted or repelled by electrical fields.

Page 2: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

2

Systemic Pesticides

Herbicidal action is supported when the chemical is distributed via

phloem (to all growing parts of the plants, incl. roots).

The phloem has a high pH (ca. pH 8), and weak acids accumulate in

that. That’s why systemic herbicides are typically weak acids.

Insecticides must hit the damaging insect. Aphids and wgiteflies suck

from the phloem and drink from the xylem, mites eat the whole cell.

Thus, intracellular distribution matters.

Fungi often attack via xylem (a dead pipe). Fungicides are good if

present xylem (acidic, pH 5.5). That’s could be the reason why some

fungicides are weak bases.

Kleier’s model considers the flow in

xylem (apoplast, pH 5.5) and

phloem (symplast pH 8).

Phloem transport is due to the “ion

trap” (weak acids) or to slow

permeability (neutral, polar

substances).

Kleier model (1988) available from

Stefan Trapp (on request).

Kleier's model for

phloem transport

The REACH chemicals

143 000 chemicals pre-registered at the European

Chemical Agency ECHA for REACH. Hereof:

Source: Based on a random sample of 1511 chemicals analyzed by

Antonio Franco et alii

Cell Model

and intracellular localization

Thanks to Prof. RW Horobin

for this sketch of a cell

Typical structure of an eukaryotic cell

(seen from the perspective of a neutral compound)

Lipids

The neutral compound “sees”

only aqueous and lipid phases

Water

BCF regressions for neutral compounds

BCF: bioconcentration factor for whole organisms

Process

Partitioning into aqueous and

lipid phase (described by Kow).

Basic equation

BCF = W + L x KOW

Example

70.0log85.0log OWKBCF

"Traditional" BCF regressions predict uptake into the whole organism

and consider aqueous and lipid phase.

BCF fish (Veith et al. 1979):

Page 3: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

3

Thanks to media

photobucket

Structure of a Plant Cell

Organelles

Cell wall

Plasma membrane

Cytoplasm

Vacuole

Nucleus

Mitochondria

Chloroplast

ER + Golgi

Thanks fsu edu

Structure of an Animal Cell

Organelles

Plasma membrane

Cytoplasm

Lysosomes

Nucleus

Mitochondria

ER + Golgi

Typical structure of an eukaryotic cell

seen from the perspective of an ionic compound

cytosol

membrane

lipids

nucleus

lysosomes

(cell wall)

pH 8

pH 7 to

7.4

pH 5

pH 6.5

+20

-70

mV

-160

mV

mitochondrium

Outside

apoplast

Cytosol Vacuoles

H+ e-

pH 5-7 pH 7.5

pH

5-6

- 0.1 V

Charge at membranes by proton transport

ATP

Membrane

Neutral molecules adsorb often to lipids

Page 4: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

4

Bioaccumulation of a weak acid

(2,4-D, pKa ~ 3)

1 RH 1 RH 1 RH

100 RH

neutral

ionic 100 R- 10 000 R- 100 R-

pH 5

Cytosol pH 7 Vacuole

pH 5

outside

Example: BCF of 2,4-D at pH 5 Cell model for ionic compounds

Processes: Transport across membranes neutral/ionic, dissociation in/outside,

lipophilic partitioning, electrical attraction, metabolism, pumps.

Each organelle is described by one differential equation. Dynamic matrix solution.

Proteins

)(1

,,

N

iioiNii eaae

NPJ

)( ,, inonnn aaPJ

Underlying equations

Fick’s 1st Law, flux of neutral molecules n

Nernst-Planck-equation, flux of ions i

i = inside

o = outside

J = flux

P = Permeability, f(log D)

N = Nernst potential

z = valency

E = electrical potential

F = Faraday constant

R = gas constant

T = Temperature

a = chemical activity

B = bulk capacity

C = concentration

RT

zEFN

CBa

Nernst-potential eN

activity a and concentration C

activity a times bulk capacity B gives concentration C

where B describes partitioning to lipids, proteins etc.

)( ,, inonnn aaPJ )(1

,,

N

iionoionNionion eaae

NPJ

How to find activity a ?

Activity a (mol m-3 or kg m-3) is the driving force for diffusion (and toxicity; and

reaction).

f effective fraction (n is neutral, ion is ion, W is water, L is lipids, K is adsorption, g

is activity coefficient), and analogue for fd:

ionionion

pKapHi

nnn

tnnKWKW

Cafgggg //10//

1/

)(

Steady-state concentration ratio (partition coefficient, BCF)

BCFeNePfPf

eNPfPf

C

CNN

ioniionnin

N

ionoionnon

ot

it

)1/(

)1/(

,,

,,

,

,

(t is total, i is inside, o is outside)

cmmmcmocccocc JAJAJAJA

dt

dm,,,,

cmmmcmm JAJA

dt

dm,,

change of mass in the cytoplasm mc = + flux from outside – flux to outside

– flux to mitochondria + flux from mitochondria

change of mass in the mitochondria mm =

+ flux to mitochondria – flux to cytoplasm

Mass balance Cell Model

etc. for lysosomes, chloroplasts, nucleus ...

This yields several parallel 2 x 2 matrices which are solved analytically.

N

FishiNiFishnn

WiNiWnn

W

Fish

ee

NPP

e

NPP

a

a

,,

,,

1

1

proteinsKKK

LipidsWaterB proteins

i

iOWi

n

nOWn

i

i

n

nbiota

g

g

g

g

,,

Uptake capacity B describes partitioning into water, lipids and proteins

capacityulkctivitybiota BaC _

and this replaces the BCF

Bioconcentration factor electrolytes

activity ratio in flux equilibrium ≠ 1 and f(pH)

Page 5: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

5

Permeability P of unstirred boundary layer and biomembrane

outside inside

Membrane

Dx = 50 nm

lipid layer

Dx ≈ 30 mm

aqueos layer

Dx ≈ 0.4 mm

cell wall

boundary

layer or

cell wall

Daqua≈ 2 x 10-9 m2/s

Dcell wall ≈ 10-10 m2/s

K = 1

ebiomembranaqua

total

PP

P11

1

D≈ 10-14 m2/s

K = KOW

7.6loglog OWebiomembran KPUse:

P cellwall= 2.5x10-4 m/s and/or Paqua = Daqua/Dx

Two resistances in series

Permeability P of biomembrane

for neutral and ionic molecules

x

DKP

D

where

P = permeability (m/s)

D = diffusion coefficient ca. 10-14m2/s,

K = partition coefficient from water into the membrane ≈ KOW (L/L)

x = membrane thickness ≈ 50 nm

It follows that P ≈ 10-14/(50x10-9) m/s x KOW = 2x10-7 x KOW

log(2x10-7) = -6.7 → log P = log KOW - 6.7

log Kow ion is about 3.5 log units lower than log Kow neutral.

Permeability P ion is 3162times slower than P neutral.

Governing equation

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

log

BC

F

external pHcell model water weed 2,4-D

ricinus 3,5-D barley 2,4-D

external pH

measured data from Briggs,

Rigitano, De Carvalho et al.

The ion trap high-lighted

neutral in + ionized not out

→ activity inside changes with pH

high pH

low pH BCF of 2,4-D

pKa = 2.98

N

FishiNiFishnn

WiNiWnn

W

Fish

ee

NPP

e

NPP

a

a

,,

,,

1

1

Alternative: Activity concept

Activity a (mol m-3 or kg m-3) is the driving force for diffusion (and toxicity; and

reaction). It relates to cponcentration by

Activity nomenklatura where B is bulk capacity (m3/m3), is fraction neutral or

ionized , for biota:

CBa

Bi

iOWBi

Bn

nOWBn

B

Bi

Bi

Bn

Bn

BB

KKLWB

,

,,

,

,,

,

,

,

,

g

g

g

g

More see Trapp, Mackay, Franco 2010, Env Sci Technol.

The cell model is still programmed in old nomenklatura.

BN

BiNiBnn

WiNiWnn

BBt B

ee

NPP

e

NPP

BaBCF

,,

,,

,

1

1

The activity concept makes calculations for multi-species compounds much

simpler - once you have it in your head!

Cell Organelle Properties

Cytosol Vacuole Phloem Xylem

% volume ca. 10 ca. 1 50-90 30-46 %

pH inside 7.4 5.5 8 4.5-5.5

outside

soil,

apoplast cytosol cytosol cytosol

lipid 0.05 0.05 0 0 g/g

water 0.95 0.95 1 1 g/g

Ion strength 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.01 mol

E

-0.12

to outside

+0.02

to cytosol

0

to cytosol -0.1

+0.12 to

cytosol

Page 6: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

6

Results of the cell model - Acids

Acids external pH 5

- ion trap -

Acids external pH 7

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

2

4-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

log BCF

pKa

log Kow

0

1

2

3

4

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

2

4-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

log BCF

pKa

log Kow

0

1

2

3

4

Chemical Equilibrium to water – log BCF plants

Results of the cell model - Bases

Bases external pH 5

- opposite ion trap -

Bases external pH 9

- ion trap

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

2

4-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

log BCF

pKa

log Kow

0

1

2

3

4

Chemical Equilibrium to water – log BCF plants

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0

2

4-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

log BCF

pKa

log Kow

0

1

2

3

4

Application

Bioconcentration (fish) of weak electrolytes at pH 7

log BCF = 0.63 log D - 0.18

R2 = 0.80

-1

1

3

5

-1 1 3 5 7

log D

log

BC

F

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10

11

12

13

14

-11

357

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

log BCF

pKalog Kow

Weak bases

empirical

Predicted BCF

(Cell model)

The slope log BCF vs log D is

less for cations - because polar

cations also accumulate due to

electrical attraction!

log BCF = 0.24 log D + 0.87

R2 = 0.34

-1

0

1

2

3

-4 -2 0 2 4

log D

log

BC

F

Strong bases

empirical

Fu et al. 2009, ETaC

Prediction of Intracellular

Localization

with the cell model

Intracellular Localization

Ionizable compounds (acids, bases, amphoteres) can

concentrate in selected cell organelles, due to pH effects and

electrical attraction.

This selective accumulation is known as "intracellular localization"

(ICL).

ICL is widely used in biological staining and medicine (drug design).

Predicted ICL by the Cell Model

Chemical groups considered

Weak acids (pka from 4 to 7)

Strong acids (anions, pKa < 3)

Weak bases (pka from 6 to 10)

Cations with delocalized charge and

strong bases (cations, pKa > 10)

hydro- and lipophilic (log KOW <0 to >4)

Page 7: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

7

Weak acids (pka from 4 to 7)

● ion trap effect pKa 4-7, external pH < 7

● go mostly into cytosol (pH 7.4) and into mitochondria (pH 8)

● more uptake with lower outside-pH

Observed for pesticides: phloem mobility (pH 8)

ICL of weak acids

z = -1 z = 0

pH 2 4 6 8 pH

mitochondria

pH 8

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

log

BC

F

external pHcell model water weed 2,4-D

ricinus 3,5-D barley 2,4-D

external pH

measured data from Briggs,

Rigitano, De Carvalho et al.

The ion trap highlighted

neutral in

ionized not out

high pH

low pH

BCF of 2,4-D, pKa = 2.98

ICL of weak bases

Weak bases (pka from 6 to 10)

● ion trap effect in

acidic lysosomes and vacuoles

● more uptake with high outside-pH

► Uptake into vacuoles

may lead to detoxification!

Observed

● plant alkaloids stored in vacuoles

Observed in medicine

● delayed effect of alkaline psychopharmaka

● mutual interaction of weak bases

Many pharmaceuticals

are weak bases!

(Manallack 2009)

Predicted ICL of bivalent weak bases

quinine, base pKa 8.1, 5.1

acid pKa 11.8

pH

+2 +1 0 -1

Bivalent weak bases (pka from 4 to 10)

● good uptake if lipophilic (log Kow > 4)

● strong ion trap with pKa > 6

● good accumulation in acidic vesicles

(vacuoles, lysosomes)

Medical use:

● anti-malaria drugs

(targeting lysosomes)

quinine, chloroquine

pH 4 6 8 10 12 pH

ICL of cations with delocalized charge

Delocalized charge

→ weak dipole of cation

→ cation not hydrophilic

→ similar log D of neutral mol. and ion

→ similar membrane permeability

→ no ion trap

→ no effect of pH differences

→ electrical attraction most relevant

● attraction by mitochondria (E -160 mV) and chloroplasts (?)

Medical use: staining of mitochondria, anti-tumor drugs

Similar: strong lipophilic cations

example Rhodamine 123

charge is delocalized

Summary: Predictions of preferred ICL

polar

anions weak acids pKa 5-7, z ≥-2

weak acids pKa 6-8

lipophilic cations

bases with delocalized charge

weak bases, z = +1 or +2

lipophilic,

neutrals

zwitterionic compounds (membranes), z = -1,+1

lipophilic compounds

Page 8: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

8

Applications of the Cell Model

Ironically, though originally developed for pesticide design, the model

was rarely used for that purpose, but got popular in medical drug

design. Only now (2015) it was used for pesticide design.

Recently, we used it for pharmaceuticals, too (antibiotics).

Application of the new theory in medicine

To my surprise, our models

are widely applied in medicine

and pharmacology, too.

2000

2015

Screen-shot of the Cell Model

Chemical data input (yellow) Result for Cytosol (dark blue), vacuole (light blue),

phloem (pink) and xylem (green).

Page 9: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

9

Data input for cell organelles Concentration versus time (scroll down)

It's a free software The rest is math and calculations - better don't touch

Questions? Intermezzo

Carles Hurtado demonstrates ACD/i-lab

Page 10: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

10

5 Standard Modell

for Ionic Compounds

Standard Model for Ionics

diffusive

equilibrium

flux with water

The standard model for ionics

uses the same fluxes and

processes as the models for

neutral compounds

but the concentration ratios

(RCF, LCF, KRW etc.) of plant

cells to soil, water, xylem are

replaced

and calculated with the

cell model.

Dynamic Plant Uptake Model for Ionics Existing models for neutral molecules can be modified for ionics

by replacing the partition coefficients (Koc, RCF, LCF, KRW usw).

Soil-plant model

Tipping Buckets for soil

Cascade model for plants

Cell model

for BCF, RCF, LCF

“Standard Model” for ionics

RRR

RWR

SWS

R

R CkCKM

QCK

M

Q

dt

dC

LLL

LLA

LLA

L

LR

RWL

L CkCMK

mLgAC

M

gAC

KM

Q

dt

dC

31000

FFF

FAF

FAir

F

FR

RWF

FF CkCKM

gAC

M

gAC

KM

Q

dt

dC

1000

from Cell Model into Standard Model

Modifications for Ionics - replace partition coefficients

Trapp S. Bioaccumulation of polar and ionizable compounds in

plants.

in: J. Devillers, Ed.: Ecotoxicology Modeling. Springer,

Dordrecht, 2009.

Describes the fundamentals of the plant uptake models for

ionisable substances

Standard Model Cell Model

Fluxes and Processes as before – partition coefficients from cell model

Page 11: Some well known pesticides The Cell Model 4/41Cell Model.pdf1 The Cell Model Stefan Trapp Department of Environmental Engineering Technical University of Denmark stt@env.dtu.dk 2,4-D

11

Dynamic Model left side: cell model; right side: Bckets/ Cascade model Fundamental critics of the Model for Ionics

We work now several years on the plant uptake model for ionics.

Problem is a general issue:

Experiments like model results show very high variability (more by

Trine Eggen)

Is a model with so many input parameters (highly variable, plant

and site specific) useful at all?

Doesn't it lead to very high uncertainty of predictions?

Dedicated experiments for calibration and validation are also

missing and are difficult to do!

... but would be needed so much.

[email protected]

Questions

?

DTU Environment