Upload
vuongnhu
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SPIR NetMonitor
Research on the Sociodemography ofInternet Users in the Czech Republic
Medium title:
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Month:
September 2016
Basic information
The size of Internet population in the Czech Republic 3 290 081Number of respondents
Medium N = 63Total (for all measured media) N = 5 877
RU(number) 24 704Reach(%) 0.75PV(number) (from Czech visitors) 604 866PV(number) (from all visitors) 651 628GRP (%) 18.38
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARKSeptember 2016
-1-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 1: Sex
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Male 74.22 18 335 1.05 69.79 422 165 24.18 136.64 54.32 1 746 002 53.64 723 423 081
Female 25.78 6 369 0.43 30.21 182 701 12.44 56.44 45.68 1 468 406 46.36 625 298 502
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 1: Sex by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Male74
54
Female26
46
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-2-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 2: Age
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
10-14 yrs 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 5.20 167 052 2.22 29 970 749
15-24 yrs 15.55 3 842 0.43 19.89 120 323 13.55 56.31 27.62 887 900 20.30 273 766 610
25-34 yrs 35.55 8 782 0.97 19.10 115 544 12.81 126.71 28.06 901 840 32.00 431 602 049
35-44 yrs 26.28 6 491 0.87 26.47 160 126 21.40 112.89 23.28 748 197 29.90 403 200 511
45-54 yrs 11.64 2 874 0.84 8.63 52 228 15.28 109.42 10.63 341 849 10.88 146 693 364
55-64 yrs 10.98 2 713 1.72 25.90 156 645 99.41 224.03 4.90 157 571 4.27 57 556 279
65+ yrs 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.31 9 996 0.44 5 932 022
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 2: Age by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
10-14 yrs 05
15-24 yrs 1628
25-34 yrs 3628
35-44 yrs 2623
45-54 yrs 1211
55-64 yrs 115
65+ yrs 00
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-3-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 3: Highest Education
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Unfinished primary 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 8.29 266 632 3.35 45 179 999
Finished primary 3.61 891 0.26 2.39 14 472 4.20 33.68 10.71 344 361 8.04 108 439 471
Secondary education without leaving exam 16.91 4 178 0.80 26.06 157 639 30.09 103.80 16.30 523 814 18.28 246 603 628
Secondary education including extension stu-dies
48.00 11 858 0.99 57.51 347 867 28.90 128.16 37.45 1 203 899 41.68 562 185 140
Bachelor degree 8.13 2 009 0.62 2.97 17 955 5.50 80.09 10.16 326 492 10.39 140 157 273
University degree (MA, BA, ...) 23.34 5 766 1.05 11.07 66 934 12.19 136.61 17.09 549 207 18.25 246 156 072
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 3: Highest Education by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Unfinished primary 08
Finished primary 411
Secondary education without leaving exam 1716
Secondary education including extension studies 4837
Bachelor degree 810
University degree (MA, BA, ...) 2317
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-4-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 4: Number of Persons in the Household
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
1 person 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
2 persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
3 persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
4 persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
5 persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
6 and more persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 24 704 0.77 100.00 604 866 18.82 100.00 100.00 3 214 409 100.00 1 348 721 583
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 4: Number of Persons in the Household by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
1 person 00
2 persons 00
3 persons 00
4 persons 00
5 persons 00
6 and more persons 00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-5-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 5: Head of the Household
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Yes 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
No 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 24 704 0.77 100.00 604 866 18.82 100.00 100.00 3 214 409 100.00 1 348 721 583
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 5: Head of the Household by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Yes00
No00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-6-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 6: Economic Activity
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Employed (also on irregular basis) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Businessman, sale trader 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not working 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Retired 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 24 704 0.77 100.00 604 866 18.82 100.00 100.00 3 214 409 100.00 1 348 721 583
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 6: Economic Activity by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Employed (also on irregular basis) 00
Businessman, sale trader 00
Not working 00
Retired00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-7-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 7: ABCDE National Socioeconomic Classification
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
A - highest 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
B 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
C1 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
C2 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
C3 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
D1 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
D2 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
E 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not qualified 100.00 24 704 0.77 100.00 604 866 18.82 100.00 100.00 3 214 409 100.00 1 348 721 583
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 7: ABCDE National Socioeconomic Classification by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
A - highest 00
B00
C100
C200
C300
D100
D200
E00
Not qualified 100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-8-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 8: Net Income of the Household
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Up to CZK 6000 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1.35 43 360 0.87 11 742 811
CZK 6001 - 10000 4.62 1 141 1.37 13.91 84 154 100.76 177.87 2.60 83 515 1.97 26 623 564
CZK 10001 - 15000 2.61 644 0.31 3.42 20 690 9.83 39.84 6.55 210 522 6.24 84 220 803
CZK 15001 - 20000 5.79 1 429 0.48 5.54 33 530 11.16 61.94 9.35 300 405 10.23 138 000 684
CZK 20001 - 25000 16.32 4 032 1.16 5.13 31 012 8.91 150.82 10.82 347 894 12.22 164 771 764
CZK 25001 - 30000 10.39 2 566 0.74 11.53 69 749 20.22 96.79 10.73 344 982 12.30 165 877 101
CZK 30001 - 35000 13.05 3 223 1.37 12.29 74 363 31.65 178.48 7.31 234 991 8.16 110 028 177
CZK 35001 - 40000 22.08 5 454 2.01 30.28 183 132 67.61 262.02 8.43 270 867 10.11 136 326 288
CZK 40001 - 50000 11.69 2 887 0.91 8.95 54 164 17.08 118.49 9.87 317 123 11.26 151 889 797
CZK 50001 and more 8.17 2 019 0.60 7.60 45 963 13.57 77.55 10.54 338 808 11.36 153 166 151
No income 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 14.92 479 734 8.01 108 014 611
I don’t know 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2.35 75 489 2.10 28 377 687
Not asked 5.28 1 304 0.78 1.34 8 110 4.86 101.77 5.19 166 714 5.17 69 682 145
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 8: Net Income of the Household by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Up to CZK 6000 01
CZK 6001 - 100005
3
CZK 10001 - 150003
7
CZK 15001 - 200006
9
CZK 20001 - 2500016
11
CZK 25001 - 300001011
CZK 30001 - 3500013
7
CZK 35001 - 4000022
8
CZK 40001 - 5000012
10
CZK 50001 and more811
No income0
15
I don’t know02
Not asked55
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-9-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 9: Size of the Place of Residence
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Up to 999 inhabitants 5.63 1 389 0.29 0.93 5 642 1.17 37.63 14.95 480 556 16.74 225 801 580
1000 - 4999 inhabitants 3.25 803 0.16 6.59 39 885 7.77 20.38 15.96 513 070 16.01 215 952 852
5000 - 19999 inhabitants 33.18 8 196 1.45 22.25 134 610 23.86 189.05 17.55 564 104 17.24 232 514 144
20000 - 99999 inhabitants 42.61 10 526 1.62 51.45 311 176 47.81 210.42 20.25 650 853 19.64 264 942 044
Over 100000 inhabitants 15.34 3 789 0.38 18.77 113 553 11.29 49.02 31.29 1 005 823 30.36 409 510 963
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 9: Size of the Place of Residence by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Up to 999 inhabitants 615
1000 - 4999 inhabitants3
16
5000 - 19999 inhabitants33
18
20000 - 99999 inhabitants43
20
Over 100000 inhabitants15
31
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-10-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 10: Region
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Praha 9.93 2 454 0.38 13.65 82 565 12.74 49.25 20.17 648 297 17.98 242 450 558
Stredoceský region 10.67 2 635 0.55 6.64 40 156 8.38 71.60 14.90 478 994 15.40 207 760 792
Jihoceský region 5.34 1 318 1.38 13.79 83 397 87.23 179.46 2.97 95 601 2.89 39 042 551
Plzenský region 7.02 1 734 1.08 1.42 8 576 5.33 140.16 5.01 161 040 4.58 61 732 035
Karlovarský region 1.34 330 0.31 0.56 3 396 3.14 39.86 3.36 107 997 2.83 38 178 008
Ústecký region 6.62 1 635 0.98 3.26 19 696 11.85 128.05 5.17 166 184 4.74 63 993 172
Liberecký region 1.98 488 0.33 0.55 3 344 2.26 42.97 4.60 147 973 4.69 63 262 538
Hradecký region 15.36 3 795 1.99 6.80 41 139 21.62 259.48 5.92 190 311 5.80 78 277 303
Pardubický region 11.49 2 838 1.81 24.35 147 271 93.78 235.16 4.89 157 032 5.65 76 154 967
Region Vysocina 6.00 1 481 1.83 5.62 34 008 42.09 238.57 2.51 80 791 3.90 52 600 706
Jihomoravský region 7.16 1 769 0.42 3.13 18 959 4.53 55.00 13.02 418 621 13.03 175 684 755
Olomoucký region 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 3.33 107 156 3.67 49 490 164
Zlínský region 2.10 517 0.36 0.76 4 610 3.19 46.61 4.49 144 476 4.75 64 090 309
Moravskoslezský region 15.00 3 704 1.20 19.47 117 748 37.99 155.52 9.64 309 931 10.08 136 003 725
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 10: Region by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Praha10
20
Stredoceský region 1115
Jihoceský region 53
Plzenský region 75
Karlovarský region 13
Ústecký region 75
Liberecký region 25
Hradecký region 156
Pardubický region 115
Region Vysocina 63
Jihomoravský region 713
Olomoucký region 03
Zlínský region 24
Moravskoslezský region 1510
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-11-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 11: Facilities
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Family house, villa, farmstead 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Weekend cottage 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Car - younger than 10 year 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Car - older than 10 year 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Micro-wave oven 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Dishwasher 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Electric drilling machine 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Digital camera 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Video recorder/DVD 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Videocamera, digital videocamera 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Colour TV 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Home cinema 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Personal computer 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Cable TV 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Nothing from above 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 24 704 0.77 100.00 604 866 18.82 100.00 100.00 3 214 409 100.00 1 348 721 583
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 11: Facilities by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Family house, villa, farmstead 00
Weekend cottage 00
Car - younger than 10 year 00
Car - older than 10 year 00
Micro-wave oven00
Dishwasher00
Electric drilling machine 00
Digital camera 00
Video recorder/DVD 00
Videocamera, digital videocamera 00
Colour TV00
Home cinema00
Personal computer 00
Cable TV00
Nothing from above 00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-12-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 12: All Places of Internet Connection
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
At home 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
At work 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
At school 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
In a net café 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
At friends/family 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Other place 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 24 704 0.77 100.00 604 866 18.82 100.00 100.00 3 214 409 100.00 1 348 721 583
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 12: All Places of Internet Connection by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
At home00
At work00
At school00
In a net café00
At friends/family 00
Other place 00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-13-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 13: Measured Frequency of the Internet Use (NetMonitor)
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
1-5 days in a month 2.12 523 0.05 0.30 1 793 0.18 6.93 30.60 983 754 3.16 42 646 414
6-10 days in a month 0.74 183 0.03 0.10 627 0.11 4.00 18.55 596 130 5.76 77 621 649
11-15 days in a month 1.17 288 0.07 0.10 620 0.14 8.69 13.42 431 480 7.66 103 321 580
16-20 days in a month 19.76 4 880 1.28 29.62 179 161 46.81 165.92 11.91 382 717 10.94 147 615 969
21 and more days in a month 76.22 18 829 2.30 69.88 422 665 51.52 298.65 25.52 820 326 72.48 977 515 971
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 13: Measured Frequency of the Internet Use (NetMonitor) by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
1-5 days in a month 231
6-10 days in a month 119
11-15 days in a month 113
16-20 days in a month 2012
21 and more days in a month 7626
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-14-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 14: Characteristics of the Employment
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Top management 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Middle management 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Highly qualified specialist (teacher, scientist) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Working in the office (administration, ...) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Working outside of the office (sales agent, ...) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Foreman, sister ward, supervisor, ... 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Manual worker with minimum middle qualifi-cation
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Qualified manual worker in agriculture, fo-restry, ...
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Qualified manual worker in other professions(mechanic, fitter, craftsman)
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Manual worker without (porter, dustman) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Respondent is not employed 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 14: Characteristics of the Employment by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Top management 00
Middle management 00
Highly qualified specialist (teacher, scientist) 00
Working in the office (administration, ...) 00
Working outside of the office (sales agent, ...) 00
Foreman, sister ward, supervisor, ... 00
Manual worker with minimum middle qualification 00
Qualified manual worker in agriculture, forestry, ... 00
Qualified manual worker in other professions (mechanic, fitter,craftsman)
00
Manual worker without (porter, dustman) 00
Respondent is not employed 00
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-15-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 15: Business Activities
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Specialist (lawyer, architect) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Self employed (craftsman, seller) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Store, company owner 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Farmer 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Respondent is not a businessman 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 15: Business Activities by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Specialist (lawyer, architect) 00
Self employed (craftsman, seller) 00
Store, company owner 00
Farmer00
Respondent is not a businessman 00
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-16-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 16: Number of Subordinates
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Without subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
1 to 5 subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
6 to 10 subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
11 to 50 subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
More than 50 subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Respondent has no posibility to have subordi-nates
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 16: Number of Subordinates by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Without subordinates00
1 to 5 subordinates00
6 to 10 subordinates00
11 to 50 subordinates00
More than 50 subordinates00
Respondent has no posibility to have subordinates 00
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-17-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 17: Computer Activities Performed by Respondent
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Modifyig computer’s software by oneself (in-stalling/uninstalling/updating)
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Caring for computer’s security by oneself, secu-ring it against viruses, spyware and adware
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Modifying computer’s hardware by oneself 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Creating and saving files or folders (directories) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Working with text - copy, paste, simple modifi-cations
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Connecting a computer to LAN or wireless ne-tworks
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Other reply (old questionnaire) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
None of the above 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 24 704 0.77 100.00 604 866 18.82 100.00 100.00 3 214 409 100.00 1 348 721 583
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 17: Computer Activities Performed by Respondent by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Modifyig computer’s software by oneself(installing/uninstalling/updating)
00
Caring for computer’s security by oneself, securing it againstviruses, spyware and adware
00
Modifying computer’s hardware by oneself 00
Creating and saving files or folders (directories) 00
Working with text - copy, paste, simple modifications 00
Connecting a computer to LAN or wireless networks 00
Other reply (old questionnaire) 00
None of the above00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-18-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 18: Online Activities Done by Respondent
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Instant messaging - online communication likeICQ, AOL...
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Watching videos or teasers on the internet (eg.YouTube, iDNES, Stream, archives of TV stati-ons, ...)
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Using search engines 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Being a member of social networks (e.g.,classmates, libimseti, facebook, ...)
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Downloading games, music, movies, videosand animations
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Shopping on the Internet (e-shops ...) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
None of the above 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Other reply (old questionnaire) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 24 704 0.77 100.00 604 866 18.82 100.00 100.00 3 214 409 100.00 1 348 721 583
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 18: Online Activities Done by Respondent by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Instant messaging - online communication like ICQ, AOL... 00
Watching videos or teasers on the internet (eg. YouTube, iDNES,Stream, archives of TV stations, ...)
00
Using search engines 00
Being a member of social networks (e.g., classmates, libimseti,facebook, ...)
00
Downloading games, music, movies, videos and animations 00
Shopping on the Internet (e-shops ...) 00
None of the above00
Other reply (old questionnaire) 00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-19-
novinky.cz|Diskuze
Table 19: Total internet time spent on foreign websites
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
None or almost none time I spent on foreignwebsites
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Till 10 % approx. 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
From 10 till 30 % approx. 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
From 31 till 50 % approx. 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
From 51 till 75 % approx. 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Fore than 75 % 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
I don’t know, I’m not sure 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Respondent wasn’t asked 100.00 24 704 0.77 100.00 604 866 18.82 100.00 100.00 3 214 409 100.00 1 348 721 583
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 19: Total internet time spent on foreign websites by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
None or almost none time I spent on foreign websites 00
Till 10 % approx. 00
From 10 till 30 % approx. 00
From 31 till 50 % approx. 00
From 51 till 75 % approx. 00
Fore than 75 %00
I don’t know, I’m not sure 00
Respondent wasn’t asked 100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-20-
THE KEY
Below mentioned term "target group"(given target group, chosen target group, chosen TG) is being used here as a target group given ina table line (or column of graph) of a given sociodemographic indicator, i.e. target group "women", "Liberec region", "Retired", etc. Thetarget group "All"is defined as Persons in the age of 10+ that have visited Internet at least once in the last month.
MEDIUM:
RU(number) – a number of visitors (real users) from the respective target group of a chosen medium
RU(%) – structure of visitorsInformation on the visitors profile of a chosen medium – in the form of proportional spreading of Internet users (according to Reach)among individual target groupsRU(%) = RU(number)(medium)(chosen TG)/RU(number)(medium)(TG All)*100
Reach(%) – proportion of the number of the medium visitors from the respective target group to the size of this target groupReach(%)(CS) = RU(number)(medium)(TG)/size of TG(number)*100
PV(number) – number of page views generated in the medium by users from a respective target group
PV(%) – structure of page viewsInformation on the visitors profile of a chosen medium – in the form of proportional spreading of Internet users (according to page views)among individual target groupsPV(%) = PV(number)(medium) (chosen TG)/PV(number)(medium)(TG All)*100
TRP(%) – Target Rating PointsGross rating of a given target group on a chosen mediumTRP(%) = PV(number)(medium)/ size of TG(number)*100(similarly is defined indicator GRP(%) Gross Rating Points, the difference is that as target group all population is considered, target groupAll)
Affinity(%) – affinity of reachCoefficient expressing the relationship between the audience of a chosen medium and the audience of internetAffinity(%) = Reach(%)(medium)(chosen TG)/Reach(%)(medium)(TG All)
TOTAL:
Total RU(number) – a number of visitors (real users) from the respective target group of all measured medium
Total RU(%) – structure of visitors, i.e. information on the total Reach profile for all measured mediumInformation on the visitors profile of all measured medium – in the form of proportional spreading of Internet users (according to Reach)among individual target groupsRU(%) = RU(number)(all medium)(chosen TG) /RU(number)(all medium)(TG All)*100
Total PV(number) – number of page views generated on all measured medium by users from a respective target group
Total PV(%) – structure of visitors, i.e. information on the profile of page views in total for all measured mediumInformation on the visitors profile of all measured medium – in the form of proportional spreading of Internet users (according to pageviews) among individual target groups.PV(%) = PV(number)(all medium)(chosen TG) /PV(number)(all media)(TG All)*100
Question on IT knowledge
Basic – persons, which declare basic computer and Internet knowledge (e.g. writing basic text, saving files, electronic mail, surfingwebsites, etc
Above standard – persons, which declare above standard computer and Internet knowledge (e.g. using mathematical functions in a tablecalculator, creating graphical presentations, work with search engines, databases on the users level, etc.)
Professional – IT professionals (e.g. administrators or coders)
-21-
ABCDE classification
ABCDE classification enables evaluation of social and economical status of an individual in the society. Usually it is calculated for thehead of a household. Considering the particularity of Internet questioning a method of direct calculation for individual respondents hasbeen adopted. The methodological committee has been working on the ABCDE classification update with representatives of the researchagencies, media agencies and public professionals resulting in the suggestion of the scale A,B,C1,C2,C3,D1,D2,E. This scale correspondswith the international standard accredited by Nielsen Admosphere, a.s. and also the algorithm of the individual’s categorization corre-sponds with the international customs. ABCDE classification divides household individuals into social categories based on economicalstatus (economically active x inactive individual). For economically active it then divides entrepreneur and employee. The place at workthen serves to further differentiation (including possible number of subordinates for managing positions). The education of the examinedperson has the influence on the final categorization for all aroused classes. Based on the Nielsen Admosphere, a.s. standards for econo-mically inactive people we do not proceed according to their last employment but the level of the economic strength measured throughthe household facilities. The education influence is present here as well. Owing to the fact that the international procedure correspondsto the European levels, the social structure of the Czech population comes out worse than it used to for the current ABCD classification.Nevertheless this structure enables us to conduct comparisons within Europe. Still the committee has decided that for using it within theCzech Republic, the scale will be adjusted to take into account the specifics of the Czech Republic. This adjusted scale results from theEuropean standard by shifting one or two classes up or down based on the subsistence index of the examined person’s household.A – The group with the highest social status in the society given by a very prestigious employment and highest income at the same time.B – The group with outstanding income, usually higher management and the group of higher specialists with minimum secondary edu-cation.C1, C2, C3 – The group with average living standard and average income, e.g. small businessmen, self employees, technicians, officersand lower specialists.D1, D2 – The group with below-average living standard, e.g. low qualified or manual workers.E – The group contains 1/8 of the poorest households predominantly with inactive individuals, i.e. unemployed, retired or not qualifiedworkers.
Questions on the economic activity and employment:
These questions (3, 6, 10, 14 and 15) have been used (apart the others) mainly to set up the ABCDE classification. Based on the respon-dent’s answer to question 6 (Economic activity), he/she is then questioned by a group of specific questions. Question 6 is hence used afilter to put further questions. Thus not each respondent is asked the above mentioned five questions. Therefore for the opportunity oftarget groups creation within the whole population the segmentation of single answers to this question is supplemented with the groupof respondents that haven’t been asked this question. So for instance at question 15 "Business activities"this group is called "Respondentis not a businessman".
-22-