Upload
ngodieu
View
220
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SPIR NetMonitor
Research on the Sociodemography ofInternet Users in the Czech Republic
Medium title:
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Month:
September 2016
Basic information
The size of Internet population in the Czech Republic 1 474 599Number of respondents
Medium N = 155Total (for all measured media) N = 2 079
RU(number) 144 266Reach(%) 9.78PV(number) (from Czech visitors) 317 858PV(number) (from all visitors) 352 140GRP (%) 21.56
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARKSeptember 2016
-1-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 1: Sex
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Male 63.73 91 946 12.32 75.79 240 912 32.28 123.04 51.80 746 280 49.08 150 751 701
Female 36.27 52 320 7.53 24.21 76 946 11.08 75.24 48.20 694 402 50.92 156 415 869
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 1: Sex by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Male64
52
Female36
48
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-2-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 2: Age
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
10-14 yrs 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 10.74 154 692 2.94 9 043 782
15-24 yrs 7.77 11 212 4.19 5.76 18 301 6.84 41.82 18.58 267 730 10.92 33 540 979
25-34 yrs 19.68 28 392 9.32 13.05 41 476 13.62 93.09 21.14 304 572 17.30 53 141 881
35-44 yrs 44.71 64 498 14.48 46.75 148 598 33.36 144.61 30.92 445 395 41.40 127 161 532
45-54 yrs 19.46 28 070 17.91 28.03 89 098 56.84 178.83 10.88 156 753 17.29 53 122 878
55-64 yrs 5.89 8 493 8.86 5.33 16 933 17.65 88.43 6.66 95 921 9.34 28 703 941
65+ yrs 2.49 3 599 23.05 1.09 3 452 22.10 230.14 1.08 15 616 0.80 2 452 576
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 2: Age by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
10-14 yrs 011
15-24 yrs 819
25-34 yrs 2021
35-44 yrs 4531
45-54 yrs 1911
55-64 yrs 67
65+ yrs 21
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-3-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 3: Highest Education
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Unfinished primary 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 12.88 185 545 3.27 10 041 558
Finished primary 7.53 10 867 7.58 5.58 17 747 12.38 75.71 9.95 143 343 6.41 19 677 988
Secondary education without leaving exam 15.60 22 503 10.67 11.85 37 657 17.85 106.55 14.64 210 907 19.19 58 942 187
Secondary education including extension stu-dies
34.15 49 273 11.12 28.88 91 802 20.71 111.02 30.76 443 212 33.46 102 775 371
Bachelor degree 5.26 7 593 7.19 7.16 22 769 21.56 71.80 7.33 105 622 9.51 29 200 852
University degree (MA, BA, ...) 37.45 54 028 15.35 46.52 147 883 42.01 153.26 24.44 352 051 28.17 86 529 615
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 3: Highest Education by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Unfinished primary 013
Finished primary 810
Secondary education without leaving exam 1615
Secondary education including extension studies 3431
Bachelor degree 57
University degree (MA, BA, ...) 3724
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-4-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 4: Number of Persons in the Household
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
1 person 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
2 persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
3 persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
4 persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
5 persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
6 and more persons 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 144 266 10.01 100.00 317 858 22.06 100.00 100.00 1 440 682 100.00 307 167 570
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 4: Number of Persons in the Household by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
1 person 00
2 persons 00
3 persons 00
4 persons 00
5 persons 00
6 and more persons 00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-5-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 5: Head of the Household
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Yes 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
No 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 144 266 10.01 100.00 317 858 22.06 100.00 100.00 1 440 682 100.00 307 167 570
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 5: Head of the Household by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Yes00
No00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-6-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 6: Economic Activity
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Employed (also on irregular basis) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Businessman, sale trader 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not working 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Retired 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 144 266 10.01 100.00 317 858 22.06 100.00 100.00 1 440 682 100.00 307 167 570
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 6: Economic Activity by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Employed (also on irregular basis) 00
Businessman, sale trader 00
Not working 00
Retired00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-7-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 7: ABCDE National Socioeconomic Classification
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
A - highest 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
B 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
C1 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
C2 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
C3 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
D1 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
D2 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
E 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not qualified 100.00 144 266 10.01 100.00 317 858 22.06 100.00 100.00 1 440 682 100.00 307 167 570
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 7: ABCDE National Socioeconomic Classification by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
A - highest 00
B00
C100
C200
C300
D100
D200
E00
Not qualified 100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-8-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 8: Net Income of the Household
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Up to CZK 6000 0.33 472 3.78 0.51 1 608 12.85 37.75 0.87 12 512 0.81 2 500 195
CZK 6001 - 10000 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 3.00 43 190 2.34 7 195 267
CZK 10001 - 15000 4.79 6 910 8.26 2.69 8 546 10.22 82.51 5.81 83 639 6.28 19 295 294
CZK 15001 - 20000 4.91 7 076 6.62 1.88 5 988 5.60 66.12 7.42 106 877 4.78 14 682 294
CZK 20001 - 25000 6.46 9 316 8.91 5.36 17 051 16.30 88.94 7.26 104 607 8.96 27 512 231
CZK 25001 - 30000 5.46 7 877 7.18 1.71 5 436 4.96 71.75 7.61 109 644 7.58 23 296 070
CZK 30001 - 35000 11.42 16 476 13.85 17.24 54 802 46.05 138.27 8.26 118 998 11.90 36 568 045
CZK 35001 - 40000 11.40 16 445 15.17 11.06 35 152 32.42 151.47 7.53 108 424 11.15 34 244 088
CZK 40001 - 50000 12.41 17 903 14.59 7.45 23 668 19.29 145.69 8.52 122 722 10.18 31 255 895
CZK 50001 and more 31.15 44 941 20.22 38.03 120 891 54.40 201.95 15.43 222 234 19.20 58 973 620
No income 6.68 9 643 3.30 6.64 21 121 7.23 32.97 20.27 292 052 7.39 22 686 082
I don’t know 0.13 188 0.77 0.04 126 0.51 7.71 1.70 24 444 1.66 5 103 305
Not asked 4.86 7 012 7.68 7.38 23 468 25.69 76.67 6.34 91 334 7.77 23 855 183
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 8: Net Income of the Household by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Up to CZK 6000 01
CZK 6001 - 100000
3
CZK 10001 - 1500056
CZK 15001 - 200005
7
CZK 20001 - 2500067
CZK 25001 - 3000058
CZK 30001 - 3500011
8
CZK 35001 - 4000011
8
CZK 40001 - 5000012
9
CZK 50001 and more31
15
No income7
20
I don’t know02
Not asked56
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-9-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 9: Size of the Place of Residence
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Up to 999 inhabitants 8.52 12 288 8.29 6.91 21 964 14.81 82.74 10.29 148 314 8.92 27 400 688
1000 - 4999 inhabitants 13.14 18 954 7.17 17.33 55 071 20.82 71.56 18.36 264 523 15.98 49 078 183
5000 - 19999 inhabitants 13.09 18 878 7.25 8.61 27 354 10.50 72.36 18.08 260 523 20.41 62 705 176
20000 - 99999 inhabitants 16.62 23 975 9.61 7.63 24 261 9.72 95.96 17.32 249 495 15.85 48 700 307
Over 100000 inhabitants 48.64 70 169 13.55 59.53 189 209 36.54 135.32 35.94 517 825 38.83 119 283 215
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 9: Size of the Place of Residence by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Up to 999 inhabitants 910
1000 - 4999 inhabitants13
18
5000 - 19999 inhabitants13
18
20000 - 99999 inhabitants1717
Over 100000 inhabitants49
36
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-10-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 10: Region
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Praha 35.98 51 903 15.93 34.52 109 714 33.66 159.03 22.62 325 916 23.07 70 852 202
Stredoceský region 11.26 16 243 12.13 14.14 44 940 33.55 121.09 9.30 133 958 8.98 27 576 355
Jihoceský region 3.92 5 652 15.04 2.74 8 717 23.20 150.23 2.61 37 573 1.81 5 551 314
Plzenský region 4.59 6 615 7.74 9.31 29 599 34.64 77.31 5.93 85 453 7.46 22 908 520
Karlovarský region 3.37 4 862 7.48 1.24 3 952 6.08 74.75 4.51 64 961 3.91 11 995 491
Ústecký region 2.69 3 874 10.67 1.41 4 494 12.37 106.52 2.52 36 325 1.30 3 998 516
Liberecký region 2.13 3 070 5.40 0.64 2 025 3.56 53.91 3.95 56 874 3.55 10 904 460
Hradecký region 5.45 7 856 6.70 3.71 11 793 10.06 66.89 8.14 117 278 8.34 25 606 337
Pardubický region 2.81 4 053 20.10 0.84 2 673 13.26 200.69 1.40 20 167 1.68 5 173 143
Region Vysocina 5.91 8 520 8.41 3.18 10 108 9.98 84.01 7.03 101 283 6.67 20 473 294
Jihomoravský region 8.45 12 195 5.67 7.84 24 920 11.59 56.66 14.92 214 948 15.47 47 528 959
Olomoucký region 2.48 3 576 21.44 1.27 4 052 24.30 214.13 1.16 16 678 0.88 2 703 180
Zlínský region 0.09 129 0.30 0.05 171 0.40 3.03 2.95 42 564 2.39 7 347 395
Moravskoslezský region 10.89 15 715 8.42 19.10 60 700 32.51 84.06 12.96 186 698 14.50 44 548 405
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 10: Region by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Praha36
23
Stredoceský region 119
Jihoceský region 43
Plzenský region 56
Karlovarský region 35
Ústecký region 33
Liberecký region 24
Hradecký region 58
Pardubický region 31
Region Vysocina 67
Jihomoravský region 815
Olomoucký region 21
Zlínský region 03
Moravskoslezský region 1113
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-11-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 11: Facilities
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Family house, villa, farmstead 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Weekend cottage 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Car - younger than 10 year 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Car - older than 10 year 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Micro-wave oven 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Dishwasher 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Electric drilling machine 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Digital camera 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Video recorder/DVD 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Videocamera, digital videocamera 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Colour TV 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Home cinema 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Personal computer 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Cable TV 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Nothing from above 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 144 266 10.01 100.00 317 858 22.06 100.00 100.00 1 440 682 100.00 307 167 570
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 11: Facilities by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Family house, villa, farmstead 00
Weekend cottage 00
Car - younger than 10 year 00
Car - older than 10 year 00
Micro-wave oven00
Dishwasher00
Electric drilling machine 00
Digital camera 00
Video recorder/DVD 00
Videocamera, digital videocamera 00
Colour TV00
Home cinema00
Personal computer 00
Cable TV00
Nothing from above 00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-12-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 12: All Places of Internet Connection
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
At home 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
At work 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
At school 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
In a net café 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
At friends/family 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Other place 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 144 266 10.01 100.00 317 858 22.06 100.00 100.00 1 440 682 100.00 307 167 570
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 12: All Places of Internet Connection by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
At home00
At work00
At school00
In a net café00
At friends/family 00
Other place 00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-13-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 13: Measured Frequency of the Internet Use (NetMonitor)
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
1-5 days in a month 1.80 2 603 0.52 0.61 1 936 0.38 5.16 34.96 503 658 3.10 9 532 754
6-10 days in a month 8.75 12 618 4.66 5.08 16 151 5.97 46.57 18.78 270 558 6.45 19 820 504
11-15 days in a month 11.90 17 165 9.59 6.23 19 808 11.07 95.80 12.42 178 933 8.37 25 724 872
16-20 days in a month 13.59 19 607 11.87 7.03 22 357 13.54 118.55 11.46 165 167 16.21 49 784 170
21 and more days in a month 63.96 92 271 28.62 81.04 257 605 79.91 285.84 22.38 322 366 65.86 202 305 270
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 13: Measured Frequency of the Internet Use (NetMonitor) by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
1-5 days in a month 235
6-10 days in a month 919
11-15 days in a month 1212
16-20 days in a month 1411
21 and more days in a month 6422
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-14-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 14: Characteristics of the Employment
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Top management 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Middle management 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Highly qualified specialist (teacher, scientist) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Working in the office (administration, ...) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Working outside of the office (sales agent, ...) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Foreman, sister ward, supervisor, ... 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Manual worker with minimum middle qualifi-cation
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Qualified manual worker in agriculture, fo-restry, ...
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Qualified manual worker in other professions(mechanic, fitter, craftsman)
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Manual worker without (porter, dustman) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Respondent is not employed 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 14: Characteristics of the Employment by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Top management 00
Middle management 00
Highly qualified specialist (teacher, scientist) 00
Working in the office (administration, ...) 00
Working outside of the office (sales agent, ...) 00
Foreman, sister ward, supervisor, ... 00
Manual worker with minimum middle qualification 00
Qualified manual worker in agriculture, forestry, ... 00
Qualified manual worker in other professions (mechanic, fitter,craftsman)
00
Manual worker without (porter, dustman) 00
Respondent is not employed 00
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-15-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 15: Business Activities
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Specialist (lawyer, architect) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Self employed (craftsman, seller) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Store, company owner 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Farmer 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Respondent is not a businessman 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 15: Business Activities by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Specialist (lawyer, architect) 00
Self employed (craftsman, seller) 00
Store, company owner 00
Farmer00
Respondent is not a businessman 00
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-16-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 16: Number of Subordinates
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Without subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
1 to 5 subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
6 to 10 subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
11 to 50 subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
More than 50 subordinates 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Respondent has no posibility to have subordi-nates
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 16: Number of Subordinates by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Without subordinates00
1 to 5 subordinates00
6 to 10 subordinates00
11 to 50 subordinates00
More than 50 subordinates00
Respondent has no posibility to have subordinates 00
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-17-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 17: Computer Activities Performed by Respondent
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Modifyig computer’s software by oneself (in-stalling/uninstalling/updating)
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Caring for computer’s security by oneself, secu-ring it against viruses, spyware and adware
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Modifying computer’s hardware by oneself 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Creating and saving files or folders (directories) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Working with text - copy, paste, simple modifi-cations
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Connecting a computer to LAN or wireless ne-tworks
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Other reply (old questionnaire) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
None of the above 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 144 266 10.01 100.00 317 858 22.06 100.00 100.00 1 440 682 100.00 307 167 570
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 17: Computer Activities Performed by Respondent by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Modifyig computer’s software by oneself(installing/uninstalling/updating)
00
Caring for computer’s security by oneself, securing it againstviruses, spyware and adware
00
Modifying computer’s hardware by oneself 00
Creating and saving files or folders (directories) 00
Working with text - copy, paste, simple modifications 00
Connecting a computer to LAN or wireless networks 00
Other reply (old questionnaire) 00
None of the above00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-18-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 18: Online Activities Done by Respondent
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
Instant messaging - online communication likeICQ, AOL...
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Watching videos or teasers on the internet (eg.YouTube, iDNES, Stream, archives of TV stati-ons, ...)
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Using search engines 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Being a member of social networks (e.g.,classmates, libimseti, facebook, ...)
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Downloading games, music, movies, videosand animations
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Shopping on the Internet (e-shops ...) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
None of the above 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Other reply (old questionnaire) 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Not asked 100.00 144 266 10.01 100.00 317 858 22.06 100.00 100.00 1 440 682 100.00 307 167 570
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 18: Online Activities Done by Respondent by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
Instant messaging - online communication like ICQ, AOL... 00
Watching videos or teasers on the internet (eg. YouTube, iDNES,Stream, archives of TV stations, ...)
00
Using search engines 00
Being a member of social networks (e.g., classmates, libimseti,facebook, ...)
00
Downloading games, music, movies, videos and animations 00
Shopping on the Internet (e-shops ...) 00
None of the above00
Other reply (old questionnaire) 00
Not asked100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-19-
novinky.cz|rubrika Ekonomika
Table 19: Total internet time spent on foreign websites
MEDIUM TOTAL
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
Reach
(%)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
TRP
(%)
Affinity
(%)
RU
(%)
RU
(number)
PV
(%)
PV
(number)
None or almost none time I spent on foreignwebsites
0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Till 10 % approx. 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
From 10 till 30 % approx. 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
From 31 till 50 % approx. 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
From 51 till 75 % approx. 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Fore than 75 % 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
I don’t know, I’m not sure 0.00 0 - 0.00 0 - - 0.00 0 0.00 0
Respondent wasn’t asked 100.00 144 266 10.01 100.00 317 858 22.06 100.00 100.00 1 440 682 100.00 307 167 570
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
Chart 19: Total internet time spent on foreign websites by RU(%)
0 % 50 % 100 %
None or almost none time I spent on foreign websites 00
Till 10 % approx. 00
From 10 till 30 % approx. 00
From 31 till 50 % approx. 00
From 51 till 75 % approx. 00
Fore than 75 %00
I don’t know, I’m not sure 00
Respondent wasn’t asked 100100
Medium Total
Source: NetMonitor – SPIR – Gemius & STEM/MARK, September 2016
-20-
THE KEY
Below mentioned term "target group"(given target group, chosen target group, chosen TG) is being used here as a target group given ina table line (or column of graph) of a given sociodemographic indicator, i.e. target group "women", "Liberec region", "Retired", etc. Thetarget group "All"is defined as Persons in the age of 10+ that have visited Internet at least once in the last month.
MEDIUM:
RU(number) – a number of visitors (real users) from the respective target group of a chosen medium
RU(%) – structure of visitorsInformation on the visitors profile of a chosen medium – in the form of proportional spreading of Internet users (according to Reach)among individual target groupsRU(%) = RU(number)(medium)(chosen TG)/RU(number)(medium)(TG All)*100
Reach(%) – proportion of the number of the medium visitors from the respective target group to the size of this target groupReach(%)(CS) = RU(number)(medium)(TG)/size of TG(number)*100
PV(number) – number of page views generated in the medium by users from a respective target group
PV(%) – structure of page viewsInformation on the visitors profile of a chosen medium – in the form of proportional spreading of Internet users (according to page views)among individual target groupsPV(%) = PV(number)(medium) (chosen TG)/PV(number)(medium)(TG All)*100
TRP(%) – Target Rating PointsGross rating of a given target group on a chosen mediumTRP(%) = PV(number)(medium)/ size of TG(number)*100(similarly is defined indicator GRP(%) Gross Rating Points, the difference is that as target group all population is considered, target groupAll)
Affinity(%) – affinity of reachCoefficient expressing the relationship between the audience of a chosen medium and the audience of internetAffinity(%) = Reach(%)(medium)(chosen TG)/Reach(%)(medium)(TG All)
TOTAL:
Total RU(number) – a number of visitors (real users) from the respective target group of all measured medium
Total RU(%) – structure of visitors, i.e. information on the total Reach profile for all measured mediumInformation on the visitors profile of all measured medium – in the form of proportional spreading of Internet users (according to Reach)among individual target groupsRU(%) = RU(number)(all medium)(chosen TG) /RU(number)(all medium)(TG All)*100
Total PV(number) – number of page views generated on all measured medium by users from a respective target group
Total PV(%) – structure of visitors, i.e. information on the profile of page views in total for all measured mediumInformation on the visitors profile of all measured medium – in the form of proportional spreading of Internet users (according to pageviews) among individual target groups.PV(%) = PV(number)(all medium)(chosen TG) /PV(number)(all media)(TG All)*100
Question on IT knowledge
Basic – persons, which declare basic computer and Internet knowledge (e.g. writing basic text, saving files, electronic mail, surfingwebsites, etc
Above standard – persons, which declare above standard computer and Internet knowledge (e.g. using mathematical functions in a tablecalculator, creating graphical presentations, work with search engines, databases on the users level, etc.)
Professional – IT professionals (e.g. administrators or coders)
-21-
ABCDE classification
ABCDE classification enables evaluation of social and economical status of an individual in the society. Usually it is calculated for thehead of a household. Considering the particularity of Internet questioning a method of direct calculation for individual respondents hasbeen adopted. The methodological committee has been working on the ABCDE classification update with representatives of the researchagencies, media agencies and public professionals resulting in the suggestion of the scale A,B,C1,C2,C3,D1,D2,E. This scale correspondswith the international standard accredited by Nielsen Admosphere, a.s. and also the algorithm of the individual’s categorization corre-sponds with the international customs. ABCDE classification divides household individuals into social categories based on economicalstatus (economically active x inactive individual). For economically active it then divides entrepreneur and employee. The place at workthen serves to further differentiation (including possible number of subordinates for managing positions). The education of the examinedperson has the influence on the final categorization for all aroused classes. Based on the Nielsen Admosphere, a.s. standards for econo-mically inactive people we do not proceed according to their last employment but the level of the economic strength measured throughthe household facilities. The education influence is present here as well. Owing to the fact that the international procedure correspondsto the European levels, the social structure of the Czech population comes out worse than it used to for the current ABCD classification.Nevertheless this structure enables us to conduct comparisons within Europe. Still the committee has decided that for using it within theCzech Republic, the scale will be adjusted to take into account the specifics of the Czech Republic. This adjusted scale results from theEuropean standard by shifting one or two classes up or down based on the subsistence index of the examined person’s household.A – The group with the highest social status in the society given by a very prestigious employment and highest income at the same time.B – The group with outstanding income, usually higher management and the group of higher specialists with minimum secondary edu-cation.C1, C2, C3 – The group with average living standard and average income, e.g. small businessmen, self employees, technicians, officersand lower specialists.D1, D2 – The group with below-average living standard, e.g. low qualified or manual workers.E – The group contains 1/8 of the poorest households predominantly with inactive individuals, i.e. unemployed, retired or not qualifiedworkers.
Questions on the economic activity and employment:
These questions (3, 6, 10, 14 and 15) have been used (apart the others) mainly to set up the ABCDE classification. Based on the respon-dent’s answer to question 6 (Economic activity), he/she is then questioned by a group of specific questions. Question 6 is hence used afilter to put further questions. Thus not each respondent is asked the above mentioned five questions. Therefore for the opportunity oftarget groups creation within the whole population the segmentation of single answers to this question is supplemented with the groupof respondents that haven’t been asked this question. So for instance at question 15 "Business activities"this group is called "Respondentis not a businessman".
-22-