Upload
others
View
12
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
29 APR 09
Subsurface Mass Computation
Hadnot Point and Vicinity, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
Barbara Anderson, P.E., MSEnvEATSDR
The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
29 APR 09
Overview
• Site locations, contaminant statistics
• Mass computation – purpose, scope, methods
• Illustration of mass computation for TCE
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
29 APR 09
Site locations within the Study Area
Landfill Area
Hadnot PointIndustrial Area
Site 88
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
29 APR 09
Groundwater Contaminant Data
1984 – 2004 ….. Timeframe of available contaminant data
868 ….. Wells, boreholes, and hydropunch locations2,420 ….. Groundwater samples analyzed for PCE, TCE, DCE, Vinyl Chloride
2,611 ….. Groundwater samples analyzed for BTEX
Maximum detected concentrations in groundwater, in µg/L170,000 ….. PCE180,000 ….. TCE
36,000 ….. Benzene
* Based on contaminant data that ATSDR had received and reviewed through February 2009.
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
29 APR 09
Computation of Contaminant Mass at Hadnot Point and Vicinity
Purpose
• Calibration of fate and transport model (provides starting point and lower limit for mass loading)
• Assessment of plume stability over time• Comparison to other, similar sites
Scope
• PCE, TCE, and Benzene• Dissolved phase contaminant mass (some unsaturated zone and
free product areas considered)• Multiple areas across the study site
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
29 APR 09
General Methodology
(1)
Select and prepare contaminant data sets (point data)
(2)
Develop two-dimensional (horizontal) concentration grids/distributions using interpolation techniques
(3)
Calculate average contaminant concentration across two-dimensional horizontal plume
(4)
Contaminant mass = Ave. conc. across horiz. plume x
Planar area of plume x Aquifer thickness x
Aquifer porosity x
Conversion factors
Aquifer thickness
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
29 APR 09
Data Preparation and Interpolation
Data preparation• Select data sets by considering
– Horizontal distribution of contaminants (identify sites within the study area)– Vertical distribution (sample altitudes)– Temporal distribution (sample collection dates)
• Multiple detections at same location: using average vs. maximum values
• Nondetects and censored nondetects: set to zero
Interpolation• Ordinary kriging using standard, default assumptions within Surfer software
• 10 foot x 10 foot grid cell size
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
29 APR 09
• Landfill Area
• Hadnot Point Industrial Area 1 (HPIA 1)
• Hadnot Point Industrial Area 2 (HPIA 2)
• Site 88
1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004Time, in years
0
40
80
120
Num
ber
of T
CE g
roun
dwat
er a
naly
ses
58
139
16
28
60
45
101
73
59 6166
37
72
Number of availableTCE groundwater analyses per year for the Landfill Area
Extraction well startup(October 1996)
Illustration: TCE Mass Computation
LandfillArea
HPIA 1
HPIA 2
Site 88
Data range: 1984–1993
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
2500000 2501000 2502000 2503000 2504000 2505000
Easting coordinates, in feet (State Plane Coordinate System for North Carolina, NAD 1983 datum)
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
Sam
ple
altit
ude,
in fe
et re
fere
nced
to th
e N
atio
nal G
eode
tic V
ertic
al D
atum
(NG
VD
)
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
ExplanationBelow detection limitTCE detected in groundwater Symbol size is proportional to concentration Min = 0.5 µg/L, Max = 58,000 0.5 µg/L
West East
Minimum0.5 µg/L
Maximum58,000 µg/L
Brewster Boulevard Aquifer System
Tarawa Terrace Aquifer System
Castle Hayne Aquifer System
Vertical distribution of TCE, Landfill Area, 1984–1993
Upper Castle Hayne Aquifer – River Bend unit (UCHRBU)
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
2500000 2501000 2502000 2503000 2504000 2505000 2506000 Easting coordinates, in feet (North Carolina State Plane Coordinate System, NAD 1983 datum)
342000
343000
344000
345000
346000
347000
348000
349000
350000
351000
352000
Nor
thin
g co
ordi
nate
s, in
feet
(N
orth
Car
olin
a S
tate
Pla
ne C
oord
inat
e S
yste
m, N
AD
198
3 da
tum
)
0
60
6.4
37
0.9
54000
1.65
1.2
0
0
6350
20000
03.1
0
4.05
7949
34
0
100
500
1000
5000
10000
20000
TCE Concentrations in the Lower Aquifer (UCHRBU) Landfill Area, 1984–1993
• Use Surfer’s grid volume report utility to obtain:– Grid “volume”, in µg/L - ft2 (essentially the sum of
the area-weighted concentration for each grid cell)– Planar area of the plume, in ft2
• Average TCE concentration for the plume, in µg /L = Grid “volume" / Planar area of the plume (Ricker 2008)
Ricker JA. A Practical Method to Evaluate Ground Water Contaminant Plume Stability. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation. 2008; 28(40):85–94. *** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
29 APR 09
TCE mass [grams] = TCE average concentration [µg/L] x Planar area [ft2] x Aquifer thickness [ft] x Aquifer porosity x 28.31685 [L/ft3] x 0.000001 [g/µg]
Planar area of the plume 11,862,377 ft2 Calculated using Surfer utility
Average TCEconcentration
4,821 µg/L Calculated as “volume” of concentration grid divided by planar area of plume (both values obtained using Surfer utility)
Aquifer thickness 22 ft2 Average estimated thickness of Upper Castle Hayne –River Bend Unit (UCHRBU) in the Landfill Area
Aquifer effective porosityAquifer total porosity
0.200.40
Estimated porosities for UCHRBU from site-specific data
Conversion factors 28.31685 Liters per cubic foot
1 x 10-6 Grams per microgram
Dissolved phase TCE 7,100,000 grams14,000,000 grams
1,300 gallons (using effective porosity)
2,600 gallons (using total porosity)
TCE Concentrations in the Lower Aquifer (UCHRBU)Landfill Area, 1984–1993
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***
29 APR 09
Questions?
*** D R A F T - SUBJECT TO CHANGE ***