1st Periodic Dissemination Reportversion no. 2RASOR-DWP12.19-20160525-1-AG–

RASOR Community of Practice Inaugural Meeting, Mestre, Italy

1

DOCUMENT INFORMATION PAGE

CONTRACT NUMBER 606888

PROJECT NAME Rapid Analysis and Spatialisation of Risk

PROJECT ACRONYM RASOR

DELIVERABLE NUMBER D12.19

DELIEVERABLE NAME RASOR Community of Practice – Inaugural Meeting Report

WORK PACKAGE NUMBER 12

WORK PACKAGE NAME Dissemination Activities

DEADLINE Month 30

VERSION 2.0

DISSEMINATION LEVEL PP

NATURE Report

LEAD BENEFICIARY AG

AUTHOR / DATE OF PREPARATION

Meeting held May 2015V1 report Ch. Maasburg / 25-05-2016V2 report Andrew Eddy / 30-05-2016

REVIEWER / DATES OF REVISION Christiane Maasburg v1 / 25-05-2016Andrew Eddy v2 / 30-05-2016; 31-05-2016

SIGN-OFF FOR RELEASE Roberto Rudari / 31-05-2016

2

Table of Contents

PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT...................................................................................................................... 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................... 4

WORKSHOP REPORT....................................................................................................................................... 4

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR RASOR...........................................................................................10

ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................................................................................. 10

ANNEX 1 – AGENDA OF THE COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE INAUGURAL MEETING......................11

ANNEX 3 – LIST OF PARTICIPANTS...........................................................................................................13

3

Purpose of the Document The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the RASOR Community of Practice Inaugural Meeting (RASOR Conference) held within the framework of UR2016 in Venice, Italy, in May 2016.

Executive SummaryThe RASOR Community of Practice Inaugural Meeting was held on 17 May, 2016 in Mestre, Italy, bringing together about 50 people from user organizations and the RASOR partnership. The RASOR Community of Practice meeting was both the “Final Conference” showcasing the results of the RASOR FP7 project and the inaugural face-to-face meeting of a dynamic group of users and practitioners who will maintain the RASOR platform over the coming months and years, develop it and serve as a resource basin for RASOR-based analysis in the coming years.The meeting was extremely successful, with presentations form all case study areas, but also with presentations from “new users”, who were offered a chance to present on new uses outside the FP7 project, building on the results of the project. These new users are typical of users who can be the nucleus of the RASOR Phase 2. Some examples of new users were UNOSAT and the EC’s Joint Research Centre, who both prepared cases studies for the meeting.

Workshop Report The RASOR Community of Practice Inaugural Meeting, held on May 17 th, 2016, in Mestre, Italy brought together about 50 participants from disaster management agencies, including the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), UNOSAT, Ispra, the Italian Civil Protection Agency (DPC), the Centre National de

l'Information Géo-Spatiale (CNIGS) de Haiïti, Airbus Defence & Space, the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR)/World Bank, the Mexico City-based modeling firm ERN, PREDICT Services, Air Worldwide, NASA-JPL, the Global Earthquake Model (GEM), GNS Science New Zealand, the NOAH project (Philippines), the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment, the UK Research Council, the Indonesian National Disaster Management Authority (BNPB), the provincial Indonesian Disaster Management

Agency (BPBD), the Unilever Indonesia Foundation, GeoAdaptive, as well as RASOR partners. The event aimed to bring together beta users and new users of the RASOR platform to share experiences on how the platform can be used free of charge by the global community for multi-hazard risk assessment and full-cycle

4

risk management. It constituted the launch of a new community of practice aimed at sharing lessons learned and best practices in risk assessment.After a short introductory movie visually presenting the RASOR project, Prof. de Bernardinis, President of Ispra and Head of the Copernicus User Forum, gave an introductory presentation on how RASOR could be used in the Copernicus context given that it was the best downstream service currently available. He has invited RASOR to present at the next Copernicus User Forum at the end of May. Roberto Rudari (CIMA Foundation) and Andrew Eddy (Athena Global) presented the RASOR architecture, demonstrated key functionalities and talked about the purpose of the RASOR Community of Practice. The RASOR team during the FP7 project spent a lot of time talking to users to come up with a high level understanding of what RASOR is expected to achieve. Expert users can change the parameters, develop their own vulnerability library, integrate their own models and play with all the elements. RASOR is set up as a trade space. Non-expert users can visualize scenarios and estimate the risk for a given area. The TanDEM-X DEM is used for the calculations but it is not itself accessible to end-users. A mobile app was developed and made available to users. It will be tested in Malawi during the next round of Community-based mapping campaigns. French and Bahasa versions of the platform will be available in June and multiple versions of the platform in different languages are possible in RASOR Phase 2.The Community of Practice is supposed to be a real forum to exchange on how the tool should be evolving, priorities, tips and best practices. It could also be a lobby group. Cooperation with InaSAFE, which works in similar ways but is a desktop platform, and has a very complementary community, is being discussed with the World Bank/GFDRR. RASOR can be a bridge to communicate complex high detail risk results to decision makers in a simple manner, whereas InaSAFE can serve as an offline tool to develop RASOR layers. InaSAFE provided several slides to be shown during the session, and RASOR provided slides for the InaSAFE session, to encourage cooperation between the platforms and their users.The first block of user presentations was focused around flooding. Jude Similien from the Centre National d’Information GeoSpatiale (CNIGS) of Haiti explained why it is important for CNIGS to integrate RASOR as a decision support tool into their risk assessment process. CNIGS works with different ministries on droughts, landslides and flooding and uses in-situ and satellite data. However, the awareness of impacts is still low and CNIGS will continue to increase awareness with government ministries. A presentation of the RASOR tool is already planned. Jude is convinced that if decision makers see the value of the tool over the available areas they will work towards making it available over new areas as well. CNIGS asked for further training from the RASOR consortium.Jasper Stam from Rijkswaterstaat, the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, presented the environmental challenges the Netherlands face, how they are being addressed and how RASOR could be used operationally in the Netherlands. He presented a list of pros and cons of the platform with the challenges being the computing time, the naming and finding of files and the availability of high-level models and tools in the Netherlands. The most important assets of RASOR are the possibility to combine different scenarios in one image, the possibility of cascading risks and the easy way to add metadata. His suggestions included to allow the upload of operational forecasts and to add confidence or uncertainty information to each scenario.

5

Pak Bambang from the Province of Jakarta Disaster Management Agency (BPBD DKI Jakarta) presented the challenges Indonesia faces in terms of flooding and the how disaster management is organized in his country. He presented JakSAFE, a tool that is used for damage loss assessment. As a user he sees several strong points of RASOR as it being a free tool that is connected with familiar mapping applications (QGIS), that can import data from external GIS files and OSM and the possibility of printing an impact report. As challenges for using the tool he lists its complexity for beginners, the need for high-bandwith internet connection and the need for flood models and spatial data. He identified several key success factors for implementing RASOR in Indonesia: Detailed data, training of technical staff, commitment from the disaster management organizations, integration into already existing systems and continued R&D. He showed how RASOR was used in Jakarta to simulate a costal flood, with impact varying over time according to different subsidence rates.Veronica Casartelli from DPC summarized this first round of presentations and

initiated a discussion on RASOR and flooding. Roberto Rudari (CIMA) pointed out that the platforms serves as a link through its public interface. Joost Beckers made the point that operational forecasting is very different and runs 24/7. RASOR is only being asked to generate forecast when it is needed. He explained that it is easy to connect operational FEWS to RASOR.The next two presentations covered Seismic and Cascading Risk. Veronica Casartelli and Daniela di

Bucci from DPC talked about the 2012 Emilia earthquakes in the Po Plain showing cascading risk analysis with RASOR in a multi-hazard context. They explained how DPC has been involved from the beginning of the RASOR project with the definition of user needs, active participation and feedback in the User Workshop and the implementation of a case study. The case study looked at the interaction between the 2012 earthquake and its impact on the main levees of the Po River and potential flooding. Daniela di Bucci encouraged the RASOR team to keep improving the multi-hazard/multi-risk function of the platform including NATECH. She emphasized that it is important to avoid alerts based on a simplified approach. Given that there are several similar platforms available she suggested a comparison of results from different platforms.The next presentation by Athanassios Ganas from the National Observatory of Athens in cooperation with Andreas Antonakos from the Greek Secretariat for Civil Protection talked about the Santorini case study. He simulated a M5.5 earthquake inside the caldera and walked the participants through the exercise, selecting first the exposure, then the hazard, and finally the vulnerability. The direct impact is shown in terms of physical damage, economic damage and population affected. Dr. Ganas compared the results from RASOR to the very similar results of a simulation done by a more detailed and more complex methodology. The fact that RASOR achieved comparable results is very encouraging, as it is easier to use and faster.

He stressed the importance of historical data and customization. Customization is important as users may want to upload infrastructure layers, which they do not want to share with others. Lauro Rossi from Acrotec replied that customization is possible. A user does not have to share input information but could share the

6

results instead. He added that each user can modify the vulnerability curves. The nomenclature for the different elements is detailed in the Wikipages.The presentations right after lunch focused on new geographies for the RASOR platform. Agus Wibowo from BNPB, the Federal Disaster Management Agency in Indonesia, talked about RASOR Risk Assessment in an Indonesian context. Indonesia already uses several tools for disaster risk assessment in particular InaRISK (under development), InaSAFE and InAWARE. However, RASOR could be used as a complementary tool of hazard impact determination and the results can be linked to InAWARE. He pointed out the InaSAFE is not always very exact and RASOR may provide a more accurate impact assessment, as well as providing multihazard assessment and more complex scenarios.Dr. Mahar Lagmay from the NOAH project talked about disaster prevention and mitigation efforts in the Philippines. The NOAH project has contributed significantly to the drastic reduction of casualties during flood events. The most important

steps are warning and response. Accurate maps are necessary to warn the population early enough and to tell them where to go. During the Haiyan storm people died in the evacuation centers because the maps were insufficient. Local knowledge is combined with technology to identify areas that are always safe. Dr. Lagmay is planning to use RASOR in the future to understand better how man people are affected by a disaster and how to plan better. He stated that the flood maps created by RASOR match the flood maps that

have been generated by the NOAH project.In response to a question about financing Dr. Lagmay explained that the NOAH project had presented a policy paper in 2010 stating that it is crucial for the President of the country to support the plan and he did and talked to all his friends. The project received funding of 6 m Pesos. The next set of presentations on global users started with a presentation by Luca Vernaccini from the Joint Research Center. So far JRC uses GDACS for automatic disaster alerts to the humanitarian community. However, the system is based on empirical algorithms for impact estimates and therefore limited. Dr. Vernaccini pointed out that the more sophisticated approach of RASOR in the first hours of a disaster could complement the first analysis and greatly aid decision-making. He compared results from RASOR simulations for typhoon Haiyan and the earthquake in Ecuador with results obtained from GDACS to show that RASOR is quite accurate and can enhance JRC-DRM services in the fields of EWS and satellite-derived products. He suggested other possible applications of RASOR for Probabilistic Risk Assessment, real-time impact assessment for CR and integration with the JRC-DRM risk assessment global data.

After a short coffee break Luca Dell’Oro and Mauro Arcorace from UNOSAT talked about UNOSAT’s training and capacity development and its Flood Finder tool, a modeling tool linking meteorological, hydrological and inundation models to produce global early warnings and simulated flood scenarios for decision makers. They have simulated a flood impact assessment of the Ndjamena Chad Flood and see a very important contribution by RASOR to the quantification of physical

7

damage and economic losses. UNOSAT would like to include RASOR in its training portfolio, and plans to use the tool in late 2016 and throughout 2017 for capacity building in Africa and Asia. The next presentation was given by Oliver Lang from Airbus DS on the Global DEM in RASOR Phase 2. He presented the WorldDEM and the WorldDEM product line (WorldDEM, WorldDEM core, DSM and DTM) as well as its applications such as flood modeling, global sea-level rise and slope analysis. 85% of the DEM is already processed and will soon be available globally. Dr. Lang confirmed that the DEM is hydrologically correct. RASOR relies on the World DEM for topography on a global basis, when more detailed DEMs are not available.John Schneider from the Global Earthquake Model presented on the great complementarity between GEM’s work and RASOR. He identified the following opportunities for collaboration:

Standards for multi-hazard risk assessment (defining methodologies, database models, criteria, benchmarks on how to work together)

Exposure - local datasets GEM would happily share with RASOR GEM can provide a better hazard earthquake layer produce more

sophisticated and calibrated shake maps. Probabilistic risk assessment. GEM assesses uncertainty in models carefully. Match the RASOR interface with OpenQuake. OpenQuake and GEM have not

spent enough time making it more easily accessible to the disaster management community. “Open Quake under the hood” concept within RASOR.

Model testing, calibration and validation Share experience on training

A discussion on RASOR Phase II and the Global Community of Practice led by Andrew Eddy and Roberto Rudari followed. Andrew Eddy explained that RASOR Phase 1 was a European Commission financed project. The result was a free, generic global tool with a number of algorithms, and quite a lot of data over the initial five case study areas. Partners continue feeding the platform with more data and the World Bank is providing some funding to expand RASOR over some places, such as in northern Malawi. As evident in some “new user” presentations, there is a beginning of use of the tool over other areas. RASOR now has to coordinate and engage discussions with local champions. The RASOR core services are free and open source. The vision of the RASOR team is that people take the platform and find funding from donors to develop services using the open platform.Another possibility is to engage regional development banks to provide regional funding to enable services over a certain area. Some elements are not free in platform and there are some services that need to be paid for: e.g. near-real time satellite data. The idea is to populate the platform slowly and create an increasingly dense patchwork of data and functionalities. Originally there was the idea of having a global RASOR version but this would very coarse and might misinterpret what RASOR can do. John Schneider added that global modeling only serves a very limited number of applications.Dr. Rudari pointed out that RASOR should be use as the tool to teach risk assessment.

8

Andrew Eddy asked participants to think of where they could become a RASOR champion. This RASOR champion can then come back to the Community of Practice and find the expert who can produce what he needs. It is important to connect to other communities.Dr. Niño asked about possible support RASOR can offer to develop RASOR in a specific region or country. Mr. Eddy explained that the RASOR consortium can help develop proposals to funding organizations to customize RASOR in a selected area. It is possible to use RASOR pieces and build your own tool e.g. ‘Mexico risk assessment powered by RASOR’.Dr. Lagmay was wondering about reliability and sustainability of the RASOR platform. If the Philippines join and invest in the platform it involves big data. Mr. Eddy admitted that Phase II is a very fragile phase for RASOR in terms of financing but it has great and important partners, and that the beginnings show great promise.Joost Beckers brought up the question of local copies of the platform. Dr. Rudari explained that the central version is in Savona where everybody can view the data. It is possible to get a local copy on your system but the there is no sharing capacity. This might also create some legal issues.Dr. Rudari also informed the participants that some RASOR partners have submitted a proposal to move RASOR from a risk assessment into a resilience-monitoring tool. Another proposal has been submitted to use RASOR for a global event database that is spatialized. Andrew Eddy asked all members of the Community of Practice to use the RASOR Forum (http://www.rasor-project.eu/forums/). The Forum can be accessed with the same username and password to access the platform. All participants of the Community of Practice will be added to the Forum. Daniele di Bucci suggested to summarize all these ideas in a strategic plan. She took an action to serve as representative of the users to forge with the RASOR Phase 2 Consortium a strategic plan for the Community of Practice for the next 18 months. This will be worked on over the summer and presented in the fall.

Conclusions/Implications for RASORThe RASOR Global Community of Practice inaugural meeting was a resounding success, with strong participation and clear support from both existing and new users. The Community of Practice now counts almost 100 members (97 at the time of drafting this report) from some 60 different organizations. This community

9

shows a great deal of commitment to RASOR, and real dynamism, which will be critical to secure funding sources for RASOR continuity in the future. The RASOR Community of Practice has shown it can take ownership in the work of the FP7 Project, and ensure sustainability. The RASOR Consortium will work closely with this Community of Practice, which is formed both of users and practitioner sand developers. Both sides are critical to RASOR success, and the RASOR platform has demonstrated it is truly open by agreeing to open the strategic roadmap for future development of the Community of Practice.

AbbreviationsAbbreviation MeaningBNPB Indonesian National Disaster Management AuthorityCIMA International Centre on environmental monitoring (Italy)CNIGS Centre National de l'Information Géo-SpatialeCR Crisis ResponseDEM Digital Elevation ModelDPC Italian Department of Civil ProtectionDSM Digital Surface ModelDTM Digital Terrain ModelFEWS Flood Early Warning SystemGDACS Global Disaster Alert and Coordination SystemGEM Global Earthquake ModelGFDRR Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and RecoveryGSCP Greek Secretariat for Civil ProtectionQGIS Quantum Geographic Information SystemNASA-JPL National Aeronautics and Space Administration – Jet Propulsion

LaboratoryNATECH Natural Hazard Triggering Technological DisastersNOAH Nationwide Operational Assessment of HazardsJRC European Commission’s Joint Research CentreOSM Open Street MapR&D Research & DevelopmentRASOR Rapid Analysis and Spatialisation of RiskUNOSAT United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR)

Operational Satellite Applications Programme

10

Annex 1 – Agenda of the Community of Practice Inaugural Meeting

RASOR Global Community of PracticeInaugural Meeting, May 17th, 2016

In association with UR2016, NH Hotel, Mestre, Italy

Meeting Agenda

8:45 Arrival, coffee

9:00 Opening, Introduction of participants Welcoming remarks, RASOR in the Copernicus Context, Prof. de Bernardinis, President of ISPRA (Min. of Environment), Head of Copernicus User Forum

9:30 Overview of RASOR and the Community of Practice (Andrew Eddy, RASOR PM)

9:50 RASOR architecture and key functionality demonstration (Roberto Rudari, RASOR Coordinator)

10:20 Open question session – RASOR Questions from the Community

10:30 RASOR Flood User Showcases (15 min each)RASOR User Showcase 1, Jude Similien, Centre National d’Information Geospatiale, Haiti, RASOR Validation in a Hurricane ContextRASOR User Showcase 2, Jasper Stam, Hydrologist, Rijkswaterstaat, Holland, RASOR Validation in a Storm Surge ContextRASOR User Showcase 3, Bambang Surya Putra, BPBD DKI Jakarta, Using RASOR for Flood Risk Assessment in an Urban Context

11:15 RASOR Flood Discussion (led by Veronica Casartelli, Italian DPC)

11:30 RASOR Seismic and Cascading Risk (15 min each)RASOR User Showcase 4, Veronica Casartelli and Daniela di Bucci, Italian Department of Civil Protection (DPC), Cascading Risk Analysis with RASOR in a multi-hazard context RASOR User Showcase 5, Athanassis Ganas, National Observatory of Athens, and Andreas Antonakos, Greek Secretariat for Civil Protection, RASOR Validation in a Seismic and Volcanic Context: the Santorini Case Study

12:00 RASOR Seismic and Cascading Risk Discussion (led by Daniela di Bucci)

12:30 Lunch

11

13:30 Expanding RASOR (15 min each)RASOR New Geographies 1, Agus Wibowo , BNPB, Indonesia, RASOR Risk Assessment in an Indonesian ContextRASOR New Geographies 2, Mahar Lagmay, National Institute of Geological Sciences, Philippines, RASOR as a flood risk assessment tool in the PhilippinesRASOR New Geographies, Gumbi Gumbi, Government of Malawi Department of Surveys, Exposure Mapping with the RASOR Mobile Application and Future use of RASOR in Malawi

14:15 Open discussion on future use of RASOR by the Community: geography, functionality, and partnerships (led by Andrew Eddy)

15:15 RASOR Partner Evolution (15 min each)RASOR Partner Evolution 1 – Global Users, Luca Vernaccini, Joint Research Centre, EC, RASOR Validation in an international context, Ecuador and the PhilippinesRASOR Partner Evolution 2 – Global Users, Mauro Arcorace, UNOSAT, RASOR Validation in an international context, Capacity building in the Horn of AfricaRASOR Partner Evolution 3 –Oliver Lang, Airbus DS, The Global DEM in RASOR Phase 2RASOR Partner Evolution 4 – John Schneider, The Global Earthquake Model and RASOR – where do we go from here?

16:15 RASOR Phase 2 and the RASOR Global Community of Practice – some guidelines, some objectives, an international challenge (guided discussion, led by Roberto Rudari and Andrew Eddy)

17:00 End of Community of Practice meeting

12

Annex 3 – List of participants

List of participantsName Organization Email Contact details

Users/practitioners:

Tahir Akbar GFDRR takbar@worldbankgroup.org 1818, H Street, NW, U3-307,Washington DC, 20433, USA

Mauro Arcorace UNITAR – UNOSAT Mauro.arcorace@unitar.org Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

Bernardo De Bernardinis ISPRA Bernardo.debernardinis@isprambiente.it Via Vitaliano Brancati 48, 00144 ROMA, Italy

Daniela Di Bucci Italian Department of Civil Protection (DPC) Daniela.DiBucci@protezionecivile.it

Via Vitorchiano 2, 00189 Rome, ItalyTel.: +39-06-68204761, Cell: +39-335-7390607

Christopher G. Burton Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Christopher.burton@globalquakemodel.org Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy

Veronica Casartelli Italian Department of Civil Protection (DPC) Veronica.Casartelli@protezionecivile.it Via Vitorchiano 2, 00189 Rome, Italy

Tel: +39 06 68202884

Luca Dell’Oro UNITAR – UNOSAT Luca.DELLORO@unitar.org Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

Alessandro Ferretti TRE Altamira AF@trecanada.com Via Vittoria Colonna, 7, 20149 MilanoItaly

Nick Horspool GNS Science n.horspool@gns.cri.nz 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon 5010PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt 5040,New Zealand

Name Organization Email Contact details

Ankit JOSHI Nanyang Technological University jankit@ntu.edu.sg 50, Nanyang Avenue, N2-01A-04,

Singapore 639798

Sinta Kaniawati Munir Unilever Indonesia Foundation Sinta.kaniawati@unilever.com Graha Unilever, Jalan Gatot Subroto Kav. 15, Jakarta 12930, Indonesia

Mahar Lagmay NOAH mlagmay@noah.dost.gov.phP. Velasquez cor C. P. Garcia, Univ. of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City,Philippines 1101

Oliver Lang Airbus Defence & Space oliver.ol.lang@airbus.com Platz der Einheit 14, 14467 Potsdam, Germany

Fatma Ezzahra Maatar UNOSAT/UNITAR Maatar.f.e@gmail.com Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

Aaron Michel Air Worldwide amichel@air-worldwide.com 131 Dartmouth StreetBoston, MA 02116, USA

Karine Moreau PREDICT Services Karine.moreau@predictservices.com 20 Rue Didier Daurat, 34170 Castelnau-le-LezFrance

Rick Murnane GFDRR Rmurnane@worldbank.org 1818, H Street, NW, U3-307,Washington DC, 20433, USA

Mauro Niño E.R.N. Mauro.nino@ern.com.mx Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico

John Rees UK Research Council + BGS jgre@bgs.ac.uk Nicker Hill, Keyworth, NottinghamNG12 5GG, UK

John Schneider Global Earthquake Model (GEM) John.schneider@globalquakemodel.org Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy

14

Name Organization Email Contact details

Vitor Silva Global Earthquake Model (GEM) vitor.silva@globalquakemodel.org Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy

Paul Jude Similien CNIGS Jsimilien4@yahoo.fr Impasse Baron # 13 bis, TurgeauPort-au-Prince, Haïti (HT 6113)

Jasper Stam Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst jasper.stam@rws.nl Zuiderwagenplein 2, P.O. Box 17, 8200 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands

Bambang Surya Putra BPBD DKI Jakarta bambangsuryaputra2@gmail.comKomplek Balaikota Blok H lantai 14Jalan Merdeka Selatan Kav. 8-9 Jakarta Pusat 10110, Indonesia

Andrea Taramelli ISPRA Andrea.taramelli@isprambiente.it Via Vitaliano Brancati 48, 00144 ROMA, Italy

David Telcy CNIGS/Haïti davidtelcy@yahoo.fr Impasse Baron # 13 bis, TurgeauPort-au-Prince, Haïti (HT 6113)

Juan Carlos Vargas GeoAdaptive jcvargas@geoadaptive.com 250 Summer Street, First FloorBoston, MA 02210, USA

Annibale Vecere IUSS Pavia Annibale.vecere@umeschool.it IUSS Pavia, Palazzo del Broletto, Piazza della Vittoria, 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy

Luca Vernaccini JRC Luca.vernaccini@ext.jrc.ec.europa.eu Via Enrico Fermi, 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy

Pierre Alexilien Versaille CNIGS paversaille@cnigs.ht Impasse Baron # 13 bis, TurgeauPort-au-Prince, Haïti (HT 6113)

Andreas Walli GeoVille walli@geoville.com Sparkassenplatz 2, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Agus Wibowo BNPB agus.wibowo@bnpb.go.id Gedung GRAHA BNPB Jalan Pramuka Kav. 38, Jakarta Timur, Indonesia

Sang-Ho Yun NASA-JPL shyun@jpl.nasa.gov M/S 300-319, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA

15

Name Organization Email Contact details

RASOR Consortium members

Joost Beckers Deltares joost.beckers@deltares.nl Postbus 177, 2600 MH Delft, The NetherlandsTel: +31(0)88335 8336

Giorgo Boni CIMA Foundation Giorgio.boni@cimafoundation.org Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy

Alessandro Burastero Acrotec alessandro@acrotec.it Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy

Stefano Bruzzi Athena Global Bruzzi.stefano@gmail.com 13 Place Adolphe Cherioux, 75015 Paris, France

Alessandro Burastero Acrotech alessandro@acrotec.it Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy

Paolo Campanella Acrotech p.campanella@fadeout.it Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy

Silvia De Angeli CIMA Research Foundation Silvia.deangeli@cimafoundation.org Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, ItalyTel: +39 019-23027x237

Ferdinand Diermanse Deltares Ferdinand.diermanse@deltares.nl Postbus 177, 2600 MH Delft, The Netherlands

Andrew Eddy AG Europe andrew.eddy@athenaglobal.comLa Frouste, 04150 Simiane-la-Rotonde, FranceTel: +33 4 92 75 83 29

Luca Ferraris CIMA Foundation Luca.ferraris@cimafoundation.org Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy

Athanassios Ganas National Observatory of Athens aganas@gein.noa.gr Lofos Nymfon, Athens 11810 , GreeceTel: +30-210-3490186 , +30-6945 551722

Martin Huber German Aerospace Center (DLR) martin.Huber@dlr.de Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234 WeßlingTel: +49 8153 28-2895

Fifamè Koudogbo Altamira fifame.koudogbo@altamira-information.com C/ Corsega, 381-387, 08037 Barcelona, SpainTel: +34 93 183 57 50

Gianni Lisini EU Centre Gianni.lisini@unipv.it Via Adolfo Ferrata 1 - 27100 Pavia, Italy

16

Name Organization Email Contact details

Christiane Maasburg AG Europe christiane.maasburg@athenaglobal.comLa Frouste, 04150 Simiane-la-Rotonde, FranceTel: +33 4 92 75 83 29

Lauro Rossi Acrotech lauro.rossi@cimafoundation.org Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, ItalyTel: +39 019-23027x261

Roberto Rudari CIMA Research Foundation roberto.rudari@cimafoundation.org Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, ItalyTel: +39 01923027239, Cell: +39 3487983939

Stefano Salvi Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) stefano.salvi@ingv.it Via di Vigna Murata, 605, 00143 Rome, Italy

Tel. +39 06 51860438, cell: +39 340 5606494

Eva Trasforini CIMA Research Foundation eva.trasforini@cimafoundation.org via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, ItalyTel: +39 01923027237

Hervé Yesou UNISTRA – SERTIT herve.yesou@sertit.u-strasbg.fr 300 boulevard Sébastien Brant , BP10413, 67412 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France

17