Terminal Evaluation Report For the Project for Enhancement of … · 2015. 9. 8. · Terminal Evaluation Report For the Project for Enhancement of ... RISTEK (Kementerian Riset Dan

Terminal Evaluation ReportFor

the Project for Enhancement ofthe Disaster Management Capacity of

National Disaster Management Authority(BNPB) and

Regional Disaster Management Authority(BPBD)

in Indonesia

April, 2015

GEJR

15-132

Japan International Cooperation Agency JICA

Terminal Evaluation ReportFor

the Project for Enhancement ofthe Disaster Management Capacity of

National Disaster Management Authority(BNPB) and

Regional Disaster Management Authority(BPBD)

in Indonesia

April, 2015

Japan International Cooperation Agency JICA

Abbreviations

AIFDR Australia-Indonesia Facility for Disaster Reduction AusAID Australian Agency for International Development AVS30 Averaged Velocity of S-wave in shallow depth until 30 m APBD (Anggaran Pendapatan & Belanja Daerah) Regional Income and Expenditure

Budget BAPPEDA (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah) Regional Development Planning

Agency BAPPENAS (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional) National Development Planning

Agency BMKG (Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika) Meteorological, Climatological

and Geophysical AgencyBNPB (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana) National Disaster Management

Agency BPBD (Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah) Regional Disaster Management

Agency BPK-BMD (Badan Pengelola Keuangan dan Barang Milik Daerah) Agency for Financial

Management and Assets BPKP (Baden Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan) Financial and Development

Supervisory Board BPPT (Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi) Agency for the Assessment and

Application of Technology CBDRM Community-Based Disaster Risk Management CPX Command Post Exercise CVGHM Indonesian Center for Volcanology and Geologic Hazard Mitigation DIBI (Data & Information Bencana Indonesia), Indonesia Disaster Data & InformationDFID Department For International Development DIG Disaster Imagination Game DPA (Dokumen Pelaksanaan Anggaran) Budget Implementation Document DRR Disaster Risk Reduction FGD Focus Group Discussion GIS Geographic Information System GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit) German Society for

International CooperationHFA Hyogo Framework for Action IDR Indonesian Rupiah Ina-DRTG Indonesia Disaster Relief Training Ground IOM International Organization for Migration IPDN (Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri) Institute for Civil Servant School JCC Joint Coordinating Committee JICA Japan International Coordination Agency JPY Japanese Yen LIPI (Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia) Indonesian Institute of Sciences MLIT Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism M/M Minutes of Meeting MoU Memorandum of Understanding MUSRENBANG (Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan) Discussion for Development Planning NGO Nongovernmental Organization NTB (Nusa Tenggara Barat) West Nusa Tenggara NZ-UGM New Zealand – (Universitas Gadjah Mada) OECD-DAC Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development - Development

Assistance Committee

PDM Project Design Matrix PKK (Pemberdayaan Kesejahteraan Keluarga) Organization for Empowering the

Family Welfare. PPKK Pusat Penanggulangan Krisis Kesehatan – Ministry of Health, Centre for Health

Crisis Management PMI (Palang Merah Indonesia) Indonesian Red Cross PU (Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum) Ministry of Public Works PVMBG (Pusat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi Bencana Geologi) Centre of Volcanology and

Mitigation of Geological DisasterRANPRB (Rencana Nasional Pengurangan Risiko Bencana) National Plan of Disaster

Risk Reduction R/D Record of Discussion RDMP Regional Disaster Management Plan RISTEK (Kementerian Riset Dan Teknologi) Ministry of State for Research and

Technology RENSTRA (Rencana Strategis) Strategic Plan – 5 years RKPD (Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah) Local Government Annual Working Plan RPJMD (Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah) Regional Mid-Term

Development Plan RPJMN (Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional) National Medium-term

Development Plan SEKDA (Sekretaris Daerah) Regional Secretary SCDRR Safer Community through Disaster Risk Reduction SFDRR Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction SIBAT (Siaga Bencana Berbasis Masyarakat) Community Based Disaster Preparedness SIMDA (Sistem Informasi Manajemen Keuangan Daerah) Management Information

System of Local Government Finance SKPD (Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah) Local Government Agency SULUT (Sulawesi Utara) North Sulawesi SOP Standard Operation Procedure TAGANA (Taruna Siaga Bencana) Youth Group for Disaster Preparedness TNI (Tentara Nasional Indonesia) Indonesian Armed Forces TTX Table Top Exercise UNDP United Nations Development Program WCDRR UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015 Sendai, Japan

Table of Contents Abbreviations Table of Contents Terminal Evaluation Summary Sheet

Chapter 1: Outline of the Joint Terminal Evaluation ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives of the Terminal Evaluation ........................................................................................... 2 1.3 Outline of the Project ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Member of the Evaluation Team .................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Schedule of the Terminal Evaluation ............................................................................................. 4 1.6 Methodology of the Terminal Evaluation ...................................................................................... 4

Chapter 2: Achievement of the Project .................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Results of Input .............................................................................................................................. 5

2.1.1 Dispatch of Japanese Experts ................................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Provision of Equipment .......................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Counterpart Training .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1.4 Local Cost ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.5 Assignment of Counterpart Personnel .................................................................................... 6 2.1.6 Operation Budget ................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.7 Project facilities ...................................................................................................................... 7

2.2 Progress in Achieving Expected Outputs ....................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Output 1: Disaster Data and Information (SULUT) ............................................................... 8 2.2.2 Output 2: Hazard and Risk Maps (SULUT, NTB) ................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Output 3-1: Regional Disaster Management Plan and Action Plan (SULUT, NTB) .............. 9 2.2.4 Output 3-2: SOP and Contingency Plan (SULUT) ................................................................. 9 2.2.5 utput 4-1: Disaster Management Drill and Exercise (SULUT) .............................................. 9 2.2.6 Output 4-2: Community-based Disaster Risk Management (SULUT, NTB) ....................... 10 2.2.7 Output 5: Dissemination of RDMP technical guideline ....................................................... 10 2.2.8 Achievement of Output Indicators ....................................................................................... 10

2.3 Prospect of Achieving the Project Purpose .................................................................................. 12 2.3.1 Progress towards the Project Purpose ................................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Achievement of Project Purpose Indicator ........................................................................... 12

2.4 Implementation Process ............................................................................................................... 13

Chapter 3: Review by the Five Criteria .................................................................................................. 15 3.1 Relevance ..................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Effectiveness ................................................................................................................................ 17 3.3 Efficiency ..................................................................................................................................... 24 3.4 Impacts ......................................................................................................................................... 27 3.5 Sustainability ................................................................................................................................ 28

Chapter 4: Recommendation .................................................................................................................. 31 4.1 Conclusion of the Review by the Five Criteria ............................................................................ 31 4.2 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 31

4.2.1 Completion of all project activities. ..................................................................................... 31 4.2.2 Promotion and implementation of regency/municipality RDMP ......................................... 32 4.2.3 Discussion with BNPB on the way-forward to the Overall Goal ......................................... 32

4.3 Lessons Learned ........................................................................................................................... 33

Appendices A.1 PDM Ver.2 .................................................................................................................. A-1 A.2 Plan of Operation Ver.2 ............................................................................................. A-3 A.3 Schedule of the Terminal Evaluation .......................................................................... A-4 A.4 List of Interviewees .................................................................................................... A-5 A.5 Dispatch of Japanese Experts ..................................................................................... A-6 A.6 Provision of Equipment .............................................................................................. A-8 A.7 Counterpart Training ................................................................................................... A-9 A.8 Assignment of Counterpart Personnel ...................................................................... A-10 A.9 Operation Budget ...................................................................................................... A-20 A.10 Result Grid (Achievement of Indicators) .................................................................. A-21 A.11 List of Documents developed in the Project ............................................................. A-28 A.12 Evaluation Grid (Information and Data for the 5 Criteria) ....................................... A-29 A.13 Signed Minutes of Meeting ....................................................................................... A-33

i

Terminal Evaluation Summary Sheet 1 Outline of the Project Country: Republic of Indonesia Project Title: the Project for Enhancement of the Disaster

Management Capacity of National Authority for Disaster Management (BNPB) and Regional Agency for Disaster Management (BPBD) in Indonesia

Thematic Area : Disaster Management Division in Charge: Disaster Management Team

II, Global Environment Department, JICA Cooperation Scheme: Technical Cooperation

Project Period: November 2011～November 2015

Total Cost: 460 Million JPY (4 years)

Supporting Organization in Japan: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan Meteorological Agency, Kagoshima Prefecture, Ishinomaki City, Sumida Ward Government, etc.

Counterpart Agency: National Disaster Management Authority (BNPB), Regional Disaster Management Agencies (BPBDs) of North Sulawesi and West Nusa Tenggara Province, and the regency/municipality BPBDs in the target provinces.

1.1 Background of the Project Indonesia is a country prone to natural hazard. Geographically Indonesia is situated in the tropical zone

that has two seasons: the dry season and rainy season. Drought and forest/land fire occur in the dry season, while inundation/flooding caused by heavy rain frequently occur in the rainy season. The country is also situated at the meeting points of the Pacific plate, Euro Asian plate, and Indo Australian plate, thus facing disasters caused by earthquake, tsunami, and volcanic eruption. Recent disasters with substantial casualties include the Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami in December 2004, the Central Java earthquake in May 2006, the Padang earthquake in September 2009, eruption of Mount Merapi and the Mentawai island tsunami in September 2010.

Under the circumstances, the government of Indonesia enacted the Law No. 24 on Disaster Management in 2007 and established BNPB in 2008 to strengthen its disaster risk management capacities. At the same time, the government of Indonesia requested the government of Japan to formulate a comprehensive disaster management plan at the national and local level as well as to enhance capacities for natural disaster risk management. In response to the request, JICA implemented the Study on Natural Disaster Management in Indonesia from March 2007 to March 2009. Through this Study, a system for disaster management at national and local levels was determined. BNPB, however, was established only recently and doesn’t have enough capacities such as organizational structure, budget, skills, and knowhow, thus having difficulty in providing proper guidance and support to establish BPBDs and to formulate a Regional Disaster Management Plan (RDMP). Moreover, strengthening the capacity of BPBD is an urgent issue to improve the overall disaster risk management of Indonesia. Against this background, the Record of Discussions (R/D) was signed between BNPB and JICA on 11 July 2011 for the implementation of the Project for Enhancement of the Disaster Management Capacity of National Authority for Disaster Management (BNPB) and Regional Agency for Disaster Management (BPBD) in Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”).

The Project started in November 2011 with BNPB, North Sulawesi Provincial BPBD and all the regency/municipality BPBDs in the province as counterparts, aiming at the enhancement of the disaster management capacity of these counterpart agencies. In August 2013, at the halfway point of the implementation period, the Project underwent the mid-term review. In March 2014, the activities in the North Sulawesi Province (SULUT) as the 1st target province was completed and those in the West Nusa Tenggara Province (NTB) as the 2nd target province started in June 2014. In compliance with the provision of the R/D, JICA and Indonesian authorities concerned are jointly to conduct the terminal evaluation of the Project in April 2015, six months before the expiry of the four-year cooperation period of the Project, November 2015.

1.2 Project Overview 1) Overall Goal

The provincial BPBD as well as the regency/municipality BPBDs beside the target areas are established, and the disaster management capacities of them are enhanced by using materials formulated and methodology established in the Project.

2) Project Purpose The disaster management capacities of BNPB, the provincial BPBDs, and the regency/municipality BPBDs in

ii

the target area are enhanced. 3) Output

1. The capacity for the regency/municipality BPBDs to accumulate disaster data/information which are fundamental for disaster risk management and improve accuracy of such data/information in the target area is enhanced.

2. The capacity for creation of hazard and risk maps at regency/municipality level in the target area is enhanced.

3. The capacity for formulation of regional disaster management plans for regency/municipality in the target area is enhanced.

4. The capacity for conducting disaster management exercises at the regency/municipality in the target area is enhanced.

5. Nationwide dissemination activities are implemented. 4) Inputs (at the time of terminal evaluation) (Japanese Side) ・Expert: 18 short-term experts (from November 2011 to April 2015) ・Provision of Equipment: office equipment, satellite image, elevation data, GIS software and plotter, etc. ・Counterpart Training : 2 times (August - September 2012, and August 2014) ・Local Cost: 64.3 million JPY (July 2011 - March 2015) including equipment, training and miscellaneous.

(Indonesian Side) ・ Counterpart: Project Director (Deputy Chief for Prevention and Preparedness, BNPB), four Project

Managers and staff (BNPB), staff of North Sulawesi Province BPBD and the 15 regency/municipality BPBDs in the province, as well as West Nusa Tenggara Province BPBD and the 10 regency/municipality BPBDs in the province.

・Counter Budget: Counterpart agencies use their recurrent operational budgets for project activities. 2 Joint Evaluation Team Member of the Joint Evaluation Team

1. Dr. Raditya Jati 2. Eiji Otsuki 3. Takafumi Shinya 4. Shintaro Akiyama 5. Shusuke Irabu 6. Hiroyuki Okuda

Deputy Director for Disaster Prevention, BNPB Senior Advisor to Director General, Global Environment Dept., JICA JICA Expert (Jakarta) Advisor, Disaster Management Team 2, Global Environment Dept., JICADisaster Management Team 2, Global Environment Dept., JICA Tekizaitekisho LLC

Evaluation Period

5 April 2015～25 April 2015 Type of Evaluation：Terminal Evaluation

3 Project Performance 3.1 Progress in Achieving Expected Outputs 1) Output 1 ・ Based on the Head of BNPB Regulation No.8/2011 (Standardization of Disaster Data), five data formats to

accumulate and share necessary disaster data was developed through workshops with provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT. “Technical Guideline for Collecting and Storing Disaster Data/Information” was finalized, including the five formats above.

2) Output 2 ・ In accordance with the multi-hazard risk assessment methodologies prescribed by the Head of BNPB

Regulation No.2/2012 (General Guideline of Disaster Risk Assessment for Disaster Management Planning), hazard and risk maps for all the 15 regencies/cities in SULUT were created on 9 hazards (Flood, Flashflood, Landslides, Extreme Weather, Drought, Forest Fire, Earthquake, Tsunami, and Volcanic Eruption). In the course of the activities, “Technical Guideline for Creation of Hazard Map for Regencies/Municipalities” was developed. Same activities for creating hazard and risk maps are being implemented in NTB at present.

3) Output 3 ・ Based on the Head of BNPB Regulation No.4/2008 (Guideline for Formulation of the Disaster Management

Plan), RDMPs were formulated at the targeted 14 regencies/municipalities in SULUT through a series of workshop conducted by the Project. All the RDMPs were approved by the head of BPBD in SULUT by November 2014. In parallel with the development of RDMPs, “Technical Guideline of Regional Disaster

iii

Management Plan for Kabupaten/Kota” was developed. Same activities for formulating RDMPs are being implemented in NTB at present.

・ “Technical Guideline for Formulation of SOP (Standard Operation Procedure)” was finalized through a series of workshop with provincial and regency/municipality SULUT. In the activities, “SOP Kabupaten Kepulauan Sitaro for Facing Disaster Volcano Karangetang” was completed.

4) Output 4 ・ Total 15 disaster management exercise such as TTX (Table Top Exercise) and CPX (Command Post

Exercise) were conducted at provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT. At the end of the activities, “Technical Guideline for Disaster Relief Exercise” was finalized.

・ Activities on CBDRM (community-based disaster risk management) were implemented at two pilot villages in SULUT: Desa Moyag in Kotamobagu, and Kelurahan Bebali in Sitaro, including training workshops and the preparation of village disaster management plans and hazard maps. At the end of CBDRM activities in SULUT, “Activities for Disaster Resilient Village Program – As a Good Practice Model” was developed. Same activities on CBDRM are being implemented at one pilot village in NTB (Desa Kuta in Central Lombok regency) at present, including the tsunami evacuation drill conducted on 18 April 2015.

5) Output 5 ・ Three activities for the dissemination of RDMP Technical Guideline has so far been conducted: presentation

at side events of large-scale disaster management drill at Padang in Sumatera Barat (19 March 2014), presentation and panel discussion at the annual BNPB general meeting (14 October 2014), and technical training for 30 BNPB officers at Ina-DTRG (Indonesia Disaster Relief Training Ground) at Sentul (8-9 January 2015).

6) Achievement of Output Indicators The level of achievement is assessed based on the set indicators in the PDM (Project Design Matrix). Among

the 8 indicators set at the output level, the Project so far has achieved 3 indicators, partially achieved 4 indicators, and has yet to achieve 1 indicator. Four indicators are partially achieved at present because relevant activities are still ongoing for Output 2 (Hazard and Risk Maps), Output 3-1 (RDMP), and Output 4-2 (CBDRM) in NTB, as well for Output 5 (Dissemination of RDMP Technical Guideline) in the central government of BNPB. There is one indicator (i.e. technical guideline for formulation of RDMP is utilized as reference documents of BNPB), which is yet to be achieved. This is because the technical guideline is yet to be completed and is to be approved through due process in BNPB before it is utilized as referential documents. These activities are being implemented as planned without delay at present, and all the indicators are expected to be achieved by the end of the Project, November 2015.

3.2 Prospect of Achieving the Project Purpose Regarding the two project purpose indicators, they are only partially achieved at present because the

activities are still ongoing in the 2nd pilot province of NTB. Indicator 1 of the Project Purpose is expected to be achieved at the end of the Project when RDMPs in NTB are all finalized and approved by the head of BPBDs while all the RDMPs developed in SULUT were already approved by November 2014. Indicator 2 of the Project Purpose concerns voluntary activities within the target areas. With the interview during the terminal evaluation (not all regency/municipality BPBDs were interviewed), at least six voluntary activities in SULUT were noted (e.g. one evacuation drill in October 2013 organized by BPBD SULUT, another in May 2014 conducted by BPBD Bitung, and another in January 2015 conducted by BPBD Manado). With NTB counterpart being actively involved in the Project at present, similar voluntary activities can also be expected in NTB in future.

4 Review Based on the Five Evaluation Criteria 4.1 Relevance The relevance of the Project is high. 1) The new government has recently passed the new Middle-Term National Development Plan (RPJMN)

2015-2019, which puts emphasis on enhancing the country’s political sovereignty and independence in economy and culture. RPJMN specifically refers to issues related to DRR (disaster risk reduction) such as the improvement of the quality of the environment, and the management of natural disaster mitigation and climate change. In accordance with the RPJMN, National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019) is currently being developed.

2) The relevance of the Project to the DRR policy in Indonesia remains high from the initial planning survey in

iv

2011 through the mid-term review in 2013. Since its beginning in 2011, the Project continues to adjust its outputs and activities in accordance with the Head of BNPB regulations that have been issued one after another. Accordingly, the Project has sustained its relevance throughout the cooperation period.

3) The selection of SULUT and NTB as target provinces is appropriate in that the Project meets the needs and expectations of counterpart agencies (provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs) that require capacity development to better prepare and respond to natural disasters.

4) The Project is aligned with the cooperation policy of Japan such as the Development Cooperation Charter decided by the Japanese Cabinet in February 2015, and Japan’s County Assistance Policy for Indonesia dated April 2012. Japan has also renewed its commitment to international cooperation on DRR under the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-20130) adopted on 18 March 2015.

4.2 Effectiveness The effectiveness of the Project is high. 1) The project is assessed as effective mainly because its activities are delivering the expected outputs as

planned toward achieving the Project Purpose. Currently, the Project is making a firm progress at each output in the 2nd target province of NTB, covering all the 10 regency/municipality BPBDs. By continuing the current activities, the Project is more likely to attain its goal by the end of project period, November 2015.

2) There has been significant capacity development of the provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs at the individual level through working with the processes of project implementation. Through a series of workshop and technical follow-up, regency/municipality BPBD officers have gained knowledge on the comprehensive approach to DRR (prevention and preparedness, emergency response, recovery and reconstruction) and specific measures to be taken at each phase, acquired skills on disaster risk assessment, and eventually demonstrated what they had learned by formulating RDMPs for themselves. More importantly, BPBD officers have recognized their role/responsibility as the local DRR management agency, which leads to higher motivation to work.

3) Tangible outputs such as RDMPs, hazard maps, and various technical guidelines has enhanced BPBD’s capacity at the organizational level in that BPBDs are now equipped with plans and procedures as well as referential materials. Also, they have become more capable of preparing the budget; the list of activities included in RDMP helps BPBD to prepare RKPD (annual working plan) and then DPA (budget implementation document) in the local government. For example, BPBD Bitung has successfully raised the budget for DRR since 2013. This is attributed to the BPBD Bitung actively communicating with relevant stakeholders such as the local parliament, the mayor, BPKP (provincial local government auditor), and other local government agencies/department on RDMP, and then establishing effective working relationship with them. This is one example where the capacity development has taken place at the institutional level, not only confined to an organization or some individuals.

4) With such active efforts of regency/municipality BPBD, the budget of some BPBDs has actually been increased. At present, MoHA (Ministry of Home Affairs) administering local government, is intending to strengthen DRR activities of the local government with new legislation. Now DRR has become an obligation of local government with the Law No.23-2014. Furthermore, MoHA ministerial regulation No.27-2014 explains what is DRR (e.g. evacuation, emergency response), thus prompting the local government to prepare budget for DRR activities.

5) The hazard and risk map, the first official map of its kind at regency/municipality level in the target provinces, are widely appreciated by BPBDs. BPBDs shared the developed maps with other relevant agencies such as PU (Ministry of Public Works), TNI (Indonesian Armed Forces), PVMBG (Center of Volcanology and Mitigation of Geological Disaster), and BMKG (Meteorological, Climatological and Geophysical Agency). It has been a concern how the creation of hazard map with GIS (Geographic Information System) equipment would be sustained by the provincial BPBD since the work had been mainly conducted by GIS engineers contracted by the Project. When activities in SULUT were completed in March 2014, the GIS equipment was handed over to the BPBD SULUT dated in March 2014.

4.3 Efficiency The efficiency of the Project to date is high. 1) The Project has been implemented without encountering major obstacles (such as described in the Important

Assumptions in PDM), and has been undertaken efficiently in general. Official and daily communication among project team and counterpart has been good. JCC (Joint Coordinating Committee) has been held 4

v

times. The project team was based in the target province (at Manado City in SULUT and Mataram City in NTB), but efforts of the team to visit or stay in Jakarta for reporting and consulting with BNPB regularly have kept the Project Managers at BNPB well informed.

2) Counterpart training in Japan (September 2012 and August 2014) can be highlighted as particularly effective to inspire counterpart. There were many positive remarks by those who had participated in the training, saying that the training was eye-opening, having them conscious about disaster prevention and preparedness for the first time, and having them realized how much communities/residents could do for themselves for disaster management.

4.4 Impact The impact of the Project is medium. 1) A key positive impact, which is the progress towards achieving the Overall Goal - disaster management

capacities of provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs beside the target areas are enhanced - has not really been observed as yet at the time of terminal evaluation. So far, the Project has been quite successful within the target province of SULUT and NTB, but impact beyond the target province is yet to be realized.

2) Output 5 (dissemination of technical guideline on RDMP formulation) was added to PDM to bridge between the Project Purpose and the Overall Goal at the time of Mid-term review. BNPB highly regarded the outputs of the Project and confirmed that they would disseminate the outputs to other provinces once they were finalized and approved. With such confirmation of BNPB, it is expected that activities of Output 5 will bring about more impact during the remaining project period. Furthermore, the Project is aligned and concurrent with BNPB’s initiatives and activities (e.g. formulation of RDMP at regency/municipality level, Disaster Resilient Village Program, etc), and hence can cause many positive impacts in future.

4.5 Sustainability The prospect of sustainability of the Project is high with precondition.

1) With regard to BPBDs surveyed in the terminal evaluation in SULUT and NTB (two provincial BPBDs and regency/municipality BPBDs in Bitung, Tomohon, Manado, Central Lombok, East Lombok, Mataram), the prospect of sustainability is high. Through the Project, the capacity of some BPBDs is enhanced at not only the individual or organizational level, but also at the institutional level. However, it will vary for other regency/municipality BPBDs in accordance with the current level of their capacity. Also, it should be noted that such prospect of sustainability may vary with different leadership, willingness of the government, and governing the risk at local levels are very challenging. With such precondition, the analysis and prospect of sustainability from four viewpoint (institutional, technical, human resources, and financial) are as follows.

2) Institutional viewpoint: The national and international policy environments are instrumental in promoting DRR and extending project benefits/activities. The statement at WCDRR (UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction) by the vice-president of Indonesia in March 2015 maintains that Indonesia has been investing in disaster prevention, mitigation, and preparedness and that it is now becoming their top list priority. The RPJMN (2015-2019) puts high priority to DRR as public investment. The National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019), currently being prepared to align with the RPJMN, is expected to have specific targets such as reducing existing risk and preventing new disaster risks. As such, the institutional and regulatory framework for DRR in Indonesia has been increasingly strengthened. This includes BNPB regulations and particularly MoHA regulations for regency/municipality BPBDs.

3) Technical viewpoint: Activities in outputs such as the development of RDMPs are more likely to be sustained as these RDMPs are formulated by regency/municipality BPBD staff themselves. BPBD’s application of enhanced capacities is realized as voluntary disaster management exercises, coordinated response to natural disaster events, and effective budget preparation. All of these can indicate project outputs/benefit expected to be sustained. How the activities of creating and revising hazard and risk maps with GIS equipment continue to be a concern. Some agencies such as BAPPEDA (Regional Development Planning Agency), PU, and Sam Ratulangi University are likely to have better GIS technical capacities than BPBD SULUT. The data on disaster risk assessment for GIS can be shared with these institutions towards possible collaboration on creating or revising hazard maps in future.

4) Human Resources viewpoint: The capacity of BPBD counterpart has been remarkably increased through the Project. Continuous involvement, after the Project, of BPBD counterpart in the same DRR activities cannot be counted on because transfer of BPBD staff is common. However, clarification of duty/tasks of BPBD, increased understanding and awareness of staff on DRR in general, and development of basic referential

vi

materials such as RDMP have all contributed to the increased sustainability of BPBD human resource as a whole.

5) Financial viewpoint: The sustainability from financial viewpoint is rather promising for BPBDs. MoHA has prepared the Law No.23-2014 and the ministerial regulation No.27-2014, thereby enforcing the local government to promote DRR activities with budget. Furthermore, MoHA is considering another ministerial regulation, within this year, to secure the preparation of budget for DRR in the local government financial information management system, SIMDA.

4.6 Factors that have promoted or hindered the implementation of project 1) Promoting factors

Contribution of the local consultants in the project team is significant and highly commended by Japanese experts and by counterparts. Working with 2 provincial BPBDs and all the 15 and 10 regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT and NTB, respectively, in close cooperation with BNPB in Jakarta, requires lots of efforts for communication, consultation and follow-up. The number of counterparts reaches almost 400 (31 from BNPB, 246 from BPBDs in SULUT and 115 from BPBDs in NTB), and keeping all the counterparts informed of and engaged in project activities would not be possible without dedicated efforts of the local consultants.

2) Hindering factors One notable hindering factor mentioned is the frequent transfer of counterpart, though this hasn’t

significantly affected the project implementation. Project Director changed twice due to the transfer of the Deputy of Prevention and Preparedness BNPB (August 2013 and October 2014). At provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs in SULUT, there were many transfers of BPBD directors, too. Additional explanation of tasks to successors was necessary, and attention was paid so that the involvement of staff in the Project would be consistent.

5 Results of the Terminal Evaluation 5.1 Conclusion

The relevance of the Project remains high, aligned with government policies on DRR such as the Law No.24-2007, RPJMN (2015-2019), and relevant BNPB’s regulations though the National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019) is still under finalization. The effectiveness of the Project is high because the Project is making a firm progress, and by continuing the current activities as planned, it is more likely that the Project Purpose will be achieved by the end of cooperation period, November 2015. The efficiency of the Project is assessed also high as the Project has not encountered major obstacle that could seriously hinder the project implementation. The impact of the Project is medium at present. Advancement towards the Overall Goal based on the achievements of the Project to date has not really been realized as yet, but activities for the extension of project outputs are ongoing, and BNPB’s commitment to utilize project outputs are clear. The prospect of sustainability is high with preconditions for the provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT and NTB, in general, while BNPB and MoHA are promoting DRR into the local level.

5.2 Recommendations 1) Completion of all project activities.

The Project is to achieve the Project Purpose by November 2015 by continuing planned activities while paying particular attention to the following.

・ Wrap-up workshop in NTB scheduled in September 2015 is to be planned as most effective to share experience and knowledge among BNPB and province/regency/municipality BPBDs from NTB as well as from SULUT. Tambora can be considered a good option for socialization of DRR among relevant agencies and the media.

・ The approval or authorization of six technical guidelines (e.g. Technical Guideline for formulation of RDMP) in accordance with relevant BNPB regulations is necessary for these tangible outputs to be effectively disseminated and utilized for the enhancement of regency/municipality BPBDs beyond the target provinces.

・ The annual BPBD general meeting in October 2015 needs to be a good occasion for activities of Output 5. For example, distributing the technical guideline with training seminar, sharing good practice of target regency/municipality BPBDs with others, providing lectures on DRR planning and budgeting based on MoHA legislation, can be considered as a part of agenda..

vii

2) Promotion and implementation of regency/municipality RDMP In order to implement RDMP, following actions (indicative) should be undertaken as necessary by provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs, referring to the good practices of some BPBDs as described in previous sections. ・ Communication on the RDMP with cooperating authorities/agencies such as the local parliament, mayors,

local government organs such as in health and public works, army, police, and NGOs for implementing RDMP.

・ Budget preparation based on RDMP while communicating with relevant authorizes/agencies in line with MoHA regulations so that the budget on DRR to be duly prioritized and properly accommodated in SIMDA.

・ Socialization of hazard and risk maps to agencies with GIS technical capacities (e.g. BAPEDA, PU, BMKG, Sam Ratulangi University of North Sulawesi) for possible collaboration on creation/revision of GIS map based on disaster risk assessment.

3) Discussion with BNPB on the way-forward to the Overall Goal

Way-forward to the Overall Goal based on the achievements of the Project requires discussions with and engagement of BNPB on top of some activities undertaken as Output 5. Exceedingly competing duties/time of BNPB counterparts have made their involvement in the Project rather limited than initially expected even though their engagement in the Project is clear. Still, the way-forward is to be agreed during the remaining project period toward achieving the overall goal. This is also important from the viewpoint of sustainability of project outputs. Utilization of technical guideline and methodology such as creating hazard maps is one of the essentials for enhancing the disaster management capacity of BNPB and BPBDs, and it will not be sustained without a long-term perspective and multi-faceted approach.

・ Utilization of technical guideline as a part of training module in Ina-DRTG, after these guideline are authorized, can be considered.

・ BNPB can assist BPBDs to mainstream DRR into the local government development plan. Also, BNPB can liaise with MoHA to support BPBDs preparing budget for DRR.

・ The guideline for the Standard Operation Procedures (SOP) had been made, including Output 3-2 which can be implemented for other locations in Indonesia. Drill and exercise with related characteristic can be replicated to other districs involving more stakeholders in DRR.

・ Gender mainstreaming and vulnerable groups should be more involved in CBDRM and drill exercise for better resilience of the community in local level.

・ The involvement of the all local stakeholders, including the government for Community Development and Private Sectors will be important as part of the output for the programs.

・ The Risk Reduction Index should be utilized as part of evaluation measurement tool to reduce disaster risks significantly over the period of middle-phase development, as the RPJMN has stated.

5.3 Lessons Learned 1) Training in Japan was repeatedly mentioned very fruitful by those participated, some of whom had been

highly inspired and taken great initiative to promote DRR activities in their provinces and regencies. Regarding DRR technical cooperation, training in Japan seems to have the best advantage the participants can learn compared with training in other third countries.

2) Counterpart from the 1st target province (SULUT) actively participated in the 2nd target province (NTB) activities. He shared his experience in the Project and relevant achievement with the counterpart in NTB. Thus, counterpart from preceding target areas can become a resource person for activities in following target areas, and this can be included in a project design from the beginning.

3) Efforts of some BPBDs were significant in this Project. It is important to consider, in early stage of a project, how such exemplary efforts at local level, when emerged, can be disseminated and extended nationwide.

4) In this Project, local disaster management agencies (BPBDs) are not under the line administration of Central disaster management agency (BNPB). BPBDs belong to the local government, which is under MoHA. In other countries, local disaster management is undertaken by the local branch of the central disaster management agency (e.g. Office of Civil Defense in the Philippines). Such difference of administrative arrangement of DRR institution is to be taken into consideration and reflected in the project design.

－1－

Chapter 1: Outline of the Joint Terminal Evaluation

1.1 Background

One of the fundamental features of Indonesia is that it is an archipelagic state. As consequences

much of the territory of Indonesia is made of water, which has important for its identity as nation and for

character of state. By separating Indonesia’s landmass into islands, the sea creates special challenges of

communication, coordination, and even identity. The seas that lie between and around the islands need

to be governed. These seas represent major strategic, economic, and cultural resources for Indonesia,

governing the maritime zone poses enormous practical difficulties 1 . Disaster-prone developing

countries, in particular the least developed countries, small island developing States, landlocked

developing countries, as well as middle-income countries facing specific challenges, warrant particular

attention in view of their higher vulnerability and risk levels, which often greatly exceed their capacity to

respond to and recover from disasters. Similar attention and appropriate assistance should also be

extended to other disaster-prone countries with specific characteristics, such as archipelagic countries, as

well as countries with extensive coastlines2. From this specific characteristic, Indonesia has a high risk

of disaster with its multi hazards. Therefore, special attention should define as important role of the

local government, managing the risk, policy instruments and planning with adequate risk.

Geographically Indonesia is situated in the tropical zone that has two seasons: the dry season and

rainy season. Drought and forest/land fire occur in the dry season, while inundation/flooding caused by

heavy rain frequently occur in the rainy season. The country is also situated at the meeting points of the

Pacific plate, Euro Asian plate, and Indo Australian plan, thus facing disasters caused by earthquake,

Tsunami, and volcanic eruption. Recent disasters with substantial casualties include the Indian Ocean

earthquake and tsunami in December 2004, the Central Java earthquake in May 2006, the Padang

earthquake in September 2009, eruption of Mount Merapi and the Mentawai island tsunami in September

2010.

Under the circumstances, the government of Indonesia enacted the Law No. 24 on Disaster

Management in 2007 and established BNPB (National Disaster Management Agency) in 2008 to

strengthen its disaster risk management capacities. At the same time, the government of Indonesia

requested the government of Japan to formulate a comprehensive disaster management plan at the

national and local level as well as to enhance capacities for natural disaster risk management. In

response to the request, JICA implemented "The Study on Natural Disaster Management in Indonesia"

(hereinafter referred to as "the JICA Study") from March 2007 to March 2009. Through this Study, a

system for disaster management at national and local levels was determined. BNPB, however, was

established only recently and doesn’t have enough capacities such as organizational structure, budget,

1 Indonesia beyond the Water’s Edge. Managing an Archipelagic State. Robert Cribb and Michele Ford. ISEAS. 2009. 2 Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. UN Document on SFDRR-A/CONF.224/CRP.1. 2015

－2－

skills, and knowhow, thus having difficulty in providing proper guidance and support to establish BPBD

(Regional Disaster Management Agency) and to formulate a regional disaster management plan.

Moreover, strengthening the capacity of BPBD is an urgent issue to improve the overall disaster risk

management of Indonesia.

Against this background, the Project has started in November 2011 with BNPB, North Sulawesi

Provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs as counterparts, aiming at the enhancement of the disaster

management capacity of these counterpart agencies. At the halfway point of the implementation period,

the Project underwent the mid-term review in August - September 2013. In compliance with the

provision of the Record of Discussions (R/D) signed on 11 July 2011, JICA and Indonesian authorities

concerned jointly conducted the terminal evaluation of the Project, six months before the expiry of the

project cooperation between JICA and BNPB on the Project.

1.2 Objectives of the Terminal Evaluation

The objectives of the terminal evaluation are to:

1) evaluate the level of progress and implementation of the Project towards achieving the Project

Purpose in light of the five evaluation criteria (Relevance, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Impact and

Sustainability) based on the JICA New Guideline for Project Evaluation;

2) confirm activities carried out after the mid-term review and measures taken in response to the

recommendations made at the mid-term review;

3) make recommendations for achieving the Project Purpose during the remaining project term as

well as for utilization and sustainability of project outputs/benefits; and

4) confirm the evaluation results and recommendations above with Indonesian authorities and

agree on the minutes of meetings.

1.3 Outline of the Project

R/D was signed on 11 July 2011. The PDM ver.2 approved on the 4th JCC meeting on 3 April 2014

describes the outline of the Project as follows. (Appendix 1).

1) Project Term

Four years from November 2011 to November 2015

2) Target Area (pilot province)

North Sulawesi Province (Manado Municipality and other regencies/municipalities) West

Nusa Tenggara Province (Mataram Municipality and other regencies/municipalities)

3) Target Group

National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB); at least two Regional Disaster Management

Agencies (BPBDs) of two provinces: North Sulawesi Province, West Nusa Tenggara Province,

and the Regency/Municipality BPBDs in the target area (pilot provinces)

－3－

4) Overall Goal

The provincial BPBD as well as the regency/municipality BPBDs beside the target areas are

established, and the disaster management capacities of them are enhanced by using materials

formulated and methodology established in the Project.

5) Project Purpose

The disaster management capacities of BNPB, the provincial BPBDs, and the

regency/municipality BPBDs in the target area are enhanced.

6) Outputs

1. The capacity for the regency/municipality BPBDs to accumulate disaster data/information

which are fundamental for disaster risk management and improve accuracy of such

data/information in the target area is enhanced.

2. The capacity for creation of hazard and risk maps at regency/municipality level in the

target area is enhanced.

3. The capacity for formulation of regional disaster management plans for

regency/municipality in the target area is enhanced.

4. The capacity for conducting disaster management exercises at the regency/municipality in

the target area is enhanced.

5. Nationwide dissemination activities are implemented.

1.4 Member of the Evaluation Team

The joint evaluation was conducted by the team composed by the following members:

1) Indonesian side

Name Position Organization

Dr. Raditya Jati Evaluation Deputy Director for Disaster Prevention, BNPB

2) Japanese side

Name Position Title

OTSUKI Eiji Leader Senior Advisor to the Director General, Global Environment Department, JICA

SHINYA Takafumi Disaster Management

Policy JICA Expert (Jakarta)

AKIYAMA Shintaro Survey Planning Advisor, Disaster Management Team 2, Global Environment Department, JICA

IRABU Shusuke CBDRM Disaster Management Team 2, Global Environment Department, JICA

OKUDA Hiroyuki Evaluation and Analysis Tekizaitekisho. LLC.

－4－

1.5 Schedule of the Terminal Evaluation

The schedule of the terminal evaluation is attached (Appendix 3)

1.6 Methodology of the Terminal Evaluation

The terminal evaluation is carried out by the joint evaluation team comprising of Indonesian member

and Japanese member, in accordance with “the JICA New Guideline for Project Evaluation, Ver. 1 (June

2010)”, which follows “the Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance, 1991” issued by

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development – Development Assistance Committee

(OECD-DAC). The PDM with the statement of the Project Purpose, Outputs and Activities is the basic

reference point on the Project. Results of the joint evaluation is shared among stakeholders at the JCC

meeting, agreed upon, then finalized as the joint terminal evaluation report, and consequently signed on

the Minutes of Meetings. The process and methodology of the evaluation is as follows:

1) Verify and analyze achievements of the Project (delivery of each output, actual inputs and

progress towards the Project Purpose) and project implementation process;

2) Formulate a framework of evaluation items/questions – evaluation grid (Appendix 12) - to

collect relevant data and information on each of the five evaluation criteria;

3) Prepare a draft of joint evaluation report with the comprehensive analysis of the Project based

on findings and information collected through reports, interviews, questionnaire survey,

hearings, and project site visits;

4) Confirm measures concerning the recommendations made at the mid-term review;

5) Report the results of the terminal evaluation to the JCC, and sign the Minutes of Meeting on

what is agreed upon;

6) Survey basic policies and administrative arrangements after the inauguration of the new

president in November 2014; and

7) Draw lessons learned from experiences of the Project, which aims at capacity strengthening of

disaster management organizations for other ongoing or future similar technical cooperation

projects.

The criteria used for the evaluation are the following five criteria: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency,

impact and sustainability.

Relevance Relevance is reviewed by the validity of the Project Purpose in light of Indonesia’s development policies and needs and Japanese cooperation policies.

Effectiveness Effectiveness is assessed to what extent the Project is achieving the Project Purpose, clarifying the relationship between the Project Purpose and Outputs.

Efficiency Efficiency is analyzed with emphasis on the relationship between Outputs and Inputs in terms of timing, quality, and quantity.

Impact Impact is assessed in terms of positive/negative and expected/unexpected influence caused by the Project.

Sustainability Sustainability is assessed in terms of institutional, financial, and technical aspects by examining the extent to which the achievements of the Project will be sustained after the Project is completed.

－5－

Chapter 2: Achievement of the Project

2.1 Results of Input

(Japanese side)

2.1.1 Dispatch of Japanese Experts

The Project started with the dispatch of 7 short-term experts (Chief Advisor/Comprehensive Disaster

Management, Deputy Chief Advisor/Regional Disaster Management Planning, Disaster Management

Institution and Organization, Emergency Response Planning, Disaster Mitigation Measures, Capacity

Development, Coordinator/Support of the Expert in CBDRM) in November 2011. Since then, total 18

short-term experts have been dispatched for the Project as of April 2015, totaling 3,126 days. The

Project also has hired total 18 local staff personnel in North Sulawesi and West Nusa Tenggara Province.

They are local consultants to work for each of the 4 outputs, as well as local staff such as project

assistants, secretaries, translators/interpreters, GIS operators, and drivers. (Appendix 5)

2.1.2 Provision of Equipment

Equipment includes not only office equipment such as printer and computer, but also plotter and GIS

software along with satellite image, elevation data. The equipment were installed and used at the BPBD

SULUT office for project activities, then handed over to the provincial BPBD in March 2014 when

activities in the province were completed. Similar kind of equipment was procured and set up at the

BPBD NTB office. (Appendix 6)

2.1.3 Counterpart Training

Counterpart training was conducted twice in Japan as follows. (Appendix 7)

Duration Breakdown of the participants Visited Institutions

25 Aug – 8 Sep 2012 (19 participants)

2 from BNPB 2 from BPBD SULUT Province (including Provincial PM) 15 from regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT

MLIT Tohoku Bureau, Sumida Ward Government Ishinomaki City, etc.

16 Aug – 30 Aug 2014 (20 participants)

5 from BNPB 3 from BPBD NTB Province (including Provincial PM) 10 from regency/municipality BPBDs in NTB 1 from BPBD SULUT Province 1 from regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT

Sakurajima Volcano Center, Kagoshima local governments, CBDRM Group in Sakura-Jima, MLIT Kyusyu Bureau, Ishinomaki City, etc.

－6－

2.1.4 Local Cost

Japanese side has provided a part of necessary local operation budget to carry out project activities.

The expenses include miscellaneous expenses, equipment and training in Japan, totaling 64.3 million JPY

from July 2011 to March 2015. (Appendix 9)

(Indonesian Side)

2.1.5 Assignment of Counterpart Personnel

According to the signed R/D, Deputy Chief for Prevention and Preparedness, BNPB, is the Project

Director responsible for the overall administration and implementation of the Project, and Director for

Disaster Risk Reduction, BNPB, is the Project Manager responsible for managerial and technical matters

of the Project.

In the actual implementation, four project managers have been assigned from BNPB corresponding

to each output: they are Director for Disaster Risk Reduction (Output 2, 3-1 and 5); Director for

Preparedness (Output 3-2 and 4-1); Head of Data, Information and Public Relation Center (Output 1 and

2); and Director for Community Empowerment (Output 4-2).

Output Project Manager in BNPB Output 1 Disaster Data and Information Head of Data, Information and Public

Relation CenterOutput 2 Hazard and Risk Maps Director for Disaster Risk ReductionOutput 3-1 Regional Disaster Management Plan and

Action Plan Director for Disaster Risk Reduction

Output 3-2 SOP and Contingency Plan Director for Preparedness Output 4-1 Disaster Management Drill and Exercise Director for Preparedness Output 4-2 Community-based Disaster Risk

Management Director for Community Empowerment

Output 5 Dissemination of RDMP technical guideline Director for Disaster Risk Reduction

At the provincial level, the head of BPBD SULUT was engaged in the Project as the Province Team

Director. At the regency/municipality level, the heads of all the 15 BPBDs in SULUT were engaged in

the Project as team directors to implement project activities at each regency/municipality.

Implementation arrangement of West Nusa Tenggara Province is the same: the head of BPBD NTB is the

team director involving all the heads of 10 regency/municipality BPBDs. (Appendix 8)

2.1.6 Operation Budget

The budget amount of counterpart agencies (BNPB and BPBD) used for implementing project

activities were not clarified during the terminal evaluation as the expenditure for the purpose had not been

separately recorded at each office. (Appendix 9)

－7－

2.1.7 Project facilities

The office space and facilities were provided to the Project by BPBD SULUT from October 2012 to

March 2014, and has been provided by BPBD NTB from June 2014 to the present. The Japanese

experts, project staff and local consultants are based at the office.

2.2 Progress in Achieving Expected Outputs

Achievements and progress of the Project are examined in detail in the Result Grid in accordance

with the set indicators. At the 4th JCC in April 2014, it was agreed that activities in the 2nd target

province of NTB were to be narrowed down to Output 2, 3-1, and 4-2. The PDM was revised

accordingly as PDM ver.2. (Appendix 10)

Output

North Sulawesi Province

Oct 2012 - Mar 2014

West Nusa Tenggara

Jun 2014 - Present

Output 1 Disaster Data and Information ○ Not conducted

Output 2 Hazard and Risk Maps ○ ○

Output 3-1 Regional Disaster Management Plan and Action Plan

○ ○

Output 3-2 SOP and Contingency Plan ○ Not conducted

Output 4-1 Disaster Management Drill and Exercise ○ Not conducted

Output 4-2 Community-based Disaster Risk Management

○ ○

Output 5 Dissemination of RDMP technical guideline

Newly added output after the Mid-term review

In the 1st target province of SULUT, 1 provincial BPBD and 15 regency/municipality BPBDs were

the target groups involved in the Project. In the 2nd target province of NTB, 1 provincial BPBD and 10

regency/municipality BPBDs are the target group, implementing project activities of output 2, 3-1 and

4-2.

Administrative level

North Sulawesi (SULUT) West Nusa Tenggara (NTB)

Provincial 1 provincial BPBD 1 provincial BPBD

Regency/Municipal 4 municipality BPBDs Manado, Tomohon, Bitung,

Kotamobagu 11regency BPBDs

Bolaang Mongondow, Bolaang Mongondow North, Bolaang Mongondow South, Bolaang Mondondow East, Minahasa, Minahasa North, Minahasa South, Minahasa Southeast, Kepulauan Sitaro, Kepulauan Sangihe, Kepulauan Talaud

2 municipality BPBDs Mataram, Bima

8 regency BPBDs Lombok North, Lombok West, Lombok Central, Lombok East, Bima, Dompu, Sumbawa, Sumbawa West

－8－

2.2.1 Output 1: Disaster Data and Information (SULUT)

・ Based on the Head of BNPB Regulation No.8/2011 (Standardization of Disaster Data), five data

formats to accumulate and share necessary disaster data was developed through workshops with

provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs. Focusing on pre-disaster and emergency response

phases, these formats are: 1) Pre Disaster Data: A district/city Profile, 2) Pre Disaster Data: B

Resources Availability – Logistic, 3) Initial Record of Disaster Incident Information, 4) Emergency

Response Data: Disaster Incident Form, and 5) Survey in Disaster Location Form. At the flood

event occurred in February 2013 in Manado, the data formats were tentatively used and its suitability

and usefulness in acquiring disaster data/information were examined.

・ Technical Guideline for Collecting and Storing Disaster Data/Information was completed, including

the five formats above, in September 2013, to support the Head of BNPB Regulation No.8/2011.

2.2.2 Output 2: Hazard and Risk Maps (SULUT, NTB)

・ In accordance with the multi-hazard risk assessment methodologies (encompassing hazard,

vulnerability and local capacity) prescribed by BNPB Regulation No.2/2012, all 15

regencies/municipalities in SULUT were furnished with hazard maps, vulnerability maps, and risk

maps on nine disasters (Flood, Flashflood, Landslide, Extreme Weather, Drought, Forest Fire,

Earthquake, Tsunami, and Volcanic Eruption) through the Project by March 2014. Counterpart of

regency/municipality BPBDs were engaged in collecting historical records of disaster events and its

mapping manually (for hazard map) as well as colleting statistical data and compiling them as

database (for vulnerability map). The Project conducted digitization of collected data on GIS at the

GIS corner established at BPBD SULUT. The GIS equipment was handed over to BPBD SULUT

dated on 28 March 2014.

・ Technical Guideline for Creation of Hazard Map for Regencies/Municipalities (Ver. 2) was

developed by September 2013 in parallel with the creation of the hazard and risk maps.

・ At present, same activities are being implemented in NTB. Basic and other information on hazard,

vulnerability, capacity, and disaster risk were collected and maps were almost completed at the GIS

corner established in the BPBD NTB. As for the capacity assessment, FGD for disaster risk and

capacity assessment at regency/municipality level were conducted at all the 10 BPBD in September

2014 by a local NGO contracted by the Project. Disaster Risk Assessment Matrix for each

regency/municipality will be prepared by each BPBD to be included in the RDMP.

－9－

2.2.3 Output 3-1: Regional Disaster Management Plan and Action Plan (SULUT, NTB)

・ Based on the Head of BNPB Regulation No.4/2008, RDMPs were developed through a series of

workshop conducted by the Project with provincial/regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT (from

the kick-off in October 2012 to the wrap-up in March 2014). All the RDMPs were approved by the

head of BPBD by November 2014.

Regency/Municipality in SULUT Formulation of RDMP

Signature (for legislation) BPBD Director Mayor

1 Kota Manado Completed (developed as the sample RDMP)

Aug 2014 ○

2 Kota Tomohon Completed Oct 2014 3 Kota Bitung Completed Feb 2014 ○ 4 Kota Kotamobagu Completed Mar 2014 5 Kab. Minahasa in the BNPB project based on Perka No.4/2008 6 Kab. Minahasa North Completed Mar 2014 ○ 7 Kab. Minahasa South Completed Oct 2014 8 Kab. Minahasa Southeast Completed Aug 2014 ○ 9 Kab. Bolaang

Mongondow Completed Oct 2014

10 Kab. Bol Mon North Completed Oct 2014 ○ 11 Kab. Bol Mon South Completed Nov 2014 ○ 12 Kab. Bol Mon East Completed Oct 2014 ○ 13 Kab. Talaud (islands) Completed Mar 2014 14 Kab. Sangihe (islands) Completed Nov 2014 ○ 15 Kab. Sitaro (Islands) Completed Mar 2014 ○

・ Technical Guideline of Regional Disaster Management Plan for Kabupaten/Kota (Ver. 1.5) was

developed by August 2014 in parallel with the development and completion of RDMPs.

・ At present, same activities are being implemented in NTB. The 4th workshop was held on 16 April

2015 attended by 8 regency/municipality BPBDs. The wrap-up workshop is scheduled in

September 2015 to complete the formulation of RDMPs in 10 regencies/municipalities.

2.2.4 Output 3-2: SOP and Contingency Plan (SULUT)

・ Technical Guideline for Formulation of SOP was developed by May 2012 through a series of

workshop with provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs. SOP of Sitaro for Facing Disaster

Volcano Karangetang was completed during the Project. BPBD Tomohon revised the existing SOP

on Volcano in September 2014. BPBD Bitung also finalized its SOP in September 2014.

2.2.5 utput 4-1: Disaster Management Drill and Exercise (SULUT)

・ Total 15 disaster management exercise (1 DIG, 13 TTX, 1 CPX) were conducted by the Project. At

the end of the activities in SULUT, Technical Guideline for Disaster Relief Exercise was finalized.

－10－

Meeting Date Agenda 1) DIG 10 Oct 2012, Manado Disaster Imagination Game at the joint kick-off

workshop with the Output 3. 2) TTX 18 Oct – 6 Dec 2012 in 13

regencies/municipalities Table Top Exercise conducted at 13 Kabupaten/Kota visited by the Project team.

3) CPX 18 Sep 2013 in Manado and simultaneously in Sitaro

Disaster management drill (Command Post Exercise) was conducted with the participation of BNPB, Provincial BPBD, Manado, Bitung, and Sitaro BPBD

2.2.6 Output 4-2: Community-based Disaster Risk Management (SULUT, NTB)

・ Activities on CBDRM (community-based disaster risk management) were implemented at two pilot

villages in SULUT: Desa Moyag in Kotamobagu, and Kelurahan Bebali in Sitaro. The activities

included training workshops and the preparation of village disaster management plans and hazard

maps. The activities were implemented concurrently with the Disaster Resilient Villages Program

conducted by BNPB since 2012. At the end of CBDRM activities in SULUT, Activities for

“Disaster Resilient Village” Program – As a Good Practice Model – (Ver.1.0) Mar 2014 was

developed.

・ Same activities are currently undertaken at 1 pilot village in NTB: Desa Kuta, Kabupaten Lombok

Central, as scheduled. Following the Kick-off W/S and an introductory training on 19-20 June

2014, one community leader W/S and four community W/S were conducted. On 18 April 2015, a

tsunami evacuation drill was conducted in the village, where village people, BPBD officers (BPBD

NTB and BPBD Lombok Central), BPBD 4-2 counterparts from 9 regencies/municipalities, relevant

organizations such as army and PMI participated in.

2.2.7 Output 5: Dissemination of RDMP technical guideline

・ Dissemination of RDMP Technical Guideline has so far been conducted on occasion such as below.

1) Presentation at side events of disaster management drill - Large-scale disaster management drill at

Padang in Sumatera Barat (19 Mar 2014).

2) Presentation and panel discussion at the annual BNPB general meeting (14 Oct 2014) on the

technical guideline on RDMP with BAPPENAS and BNPB. The panel discussion was

participated by Kota Bitung on good practices from the Project.

3) Technical training for BNPB (8 - 9 Jan 2015) for 30 BNPB officers at BNPB sentul office on the

guideline for formulating RDMPs.

2.2.8 Achievement of Output Indicators

The Project has so far delivered the five outputs as summarized above. The level of achievement is

assessed based on the set indicators in the PDM. Among the 8 indicators set at the output level, the

Project so far has achieved 3 indicators, partially achieved 4 indicators, and has yet to achieve 1 indicator.

Four indicators are partially achieved because relevant activities are still ongoing in NTB such as Output

－11－

2 (Hazard and Risk Maps), Output 3-1 (RDMP), Output 4-2 (CBDRM), as well as Output 5 at the central

government level of BNPB (Technical Guideline dissemination). These activities are being

implemented as planned without delay, and are expected to be completed by the end of the Project.

There is one indicator that is yet to be achieved (Indicator 5-1), and this is because the technical guideline

is yet to be completed and is supposed to be approved through due process in BNPB before it is utilized

as referential documents.

No Indicator Assessment and Current Status

1-1 Accumulation of disaster data items (Newly accumulated since there are no existing data) in the target area.

Achieved

1-2 Improvement of disaster data quality (By following the format, data are sufficiently accumulated) in the target area.

Achieved

2-1 Number of the regencies/municipalities where hazard and risk maps at regency/municipality level are created in the target area.

Partially Achieved (Activities in NTB still ongoing.)

3-1 Number of the regencies/municipalities where regional disaster management plans are formulated at regency/municipality level in the target area.


4-1 Number of disaster management exercises implemented in the target area.

Achieved

4-2 Number of activities on CBDRM in the target area. Partially Achieved (Activities in NTB still ongoing)

5-1 Technical Guideline for formulation of RDMP is utilized as reference documents of BNPB.

Yet to be achieved (Finalization/endorsement of the Technical Guideline is necessary)

5-2 Number of events to support nationwide dissemination activities on formulation of RDMP.

Partially Achieved (More events are scheduled in future)

－12－

2.3 Prospect of Achieving the Project Purpose

2.3.1 Progress towards the Project Purpose

The Project Purpose is “the disaster management capacities of BNPB, the provincial BPBDs, and the

regency/municipality BPBDs in the target area are enhanced.”

Activities at the 1st target province of SULUT were completed in March 2014. The capacity for

BPBDs to accumulate disaster data/information was enhanced with the development of data formats and

the Manual (Output 1). Hazard and risk maps were created through the disaster risk assessment in all

the 15 regencies/municipalities (Output 2). The capacities for formulating RDMPs were enhanced as

they were prepared by BPBDs themselves at all the 15 regencies/municipalities (Output 3); and CBDRM

activities were implemented at 2 pilot villages. At the 2nd target province of NTB, activities are

currently being implemented focusing on Output 2, Output 3-1, and Output 4-2. With the completion of

these activities, the Project Purpose is likely to be achieved as there are no immediate obstacles observed

during the terminal evaluation.

2.3.2 Achievement of Project Purpose Indicator

Regarding the two project purpose indicators, they are only partially achieved at present because the

activities are still ongoing in the 2nd pilot province of NTB.

No Indicator Assessment and Current Status

1 Number or Cases that Regional Disaster Management Plan (RDMP) formulated through the Project processed to approve by the local authority.


2 Number of voluntary disaster management exercises conducted in the communities within the target area.


Indicator 1 of the Project Purpose is expected to be achieved at the end of the Project when RDMPs

in NTB are all finalized and approved by the head of BPBDs. All the RDMPs developed in SULUT

were already approved by November 2014. Indicator 2 of the Project Purpose concerns voluntary

activities within the target areas. During the terminal evaluation, at least six voluntary activities were

mentioned in the interview (not all regency/municipality BPBDs were interviewed in SULUT). These

activities were conducted after the project activities finished in March2014.

－13－

Level Voluntary disaster management exercise in the target area

Province 1) BPBD SULUT organized an evacuation drill on 4 October 2013 at governor’s field office, involving 300 personnel from BPBD Manado, BPBD Tomohon, army, provincial health office, PMI, and other institutions. The next day of the drill, stakeholder showed their resources. Each agency demonstrated how to use the equipment.

Regency and Municipality

2) BPBD Bitung organized an evacuation drill in May 2014 participated by disaster related agencies in Bitung (e.g. agency for health, social, and public works), other community based organizations (e.g. TAGANA, SIBAT), and PMI

3) BPBD Manado conducted an evacuation drill in January 2015 based on experience of the two preceding CPX (Sep 2013 and Oct 2014)

4) BPBD Sitaro allocated IDR 20 million (2014) and IDR 40 million (2015) to promote CBDRM at Desa Tatahadeng (2014), Desa Dompaso and Desa Ranotana (2015)

5) BPBD Sitaro has established “Disaster Management Forum” to revise the RDMP including members from villages.

6) BPBD Sitaro was involved in the community evacuation drill organized by the Red Cross local office in October 2014 (the relationship between BPBD Sitaro and the Red Cross local office had been strengthened due to the Project)

Village - At Kelurahan Bebali (one of the two pilot villages) Sitaro, consideration on revising volcano hazard map for setting up sign boards is ongoing in 2015

2.4 Implementation Process

At BNPB, there are four Project Managers assigned under the Project Director. Under the four

project managers, more than 17 officials of BNPB have been engaged in the Project as the counterpart.

The Project Director changed two times (August 2013, October 2014) due to the transfer of the Deputy of

Prevention and Preparedness BNPB. At the provincial level, BPBD SULUT and BPBD NTB are

engaged in the Project to coordinate regency/municipality BPBDs. Also, at the regency/municipality

level, at least two officials are supposed to be assigned to one of the sub-divided outputs from each

regency/municipality BPBD. As such, almost 400 BPBD officers in total are involved in the Project at

the regency/municipality level.

The Japanese project team consists of Japanese short-term experts, 4 local consultants and 10 project

local staff (such as secretaries, translators, GIS operators, and drivers). The Project covers all the

regencies/municipalities under the two provinces; hence it is not possible for the Japanese experts to

frequently visit each regency/municipality BPBD for transferring knowledge/skills. Local consultants

bridged that gap, visiting regencies/municipalities as necessary to ensure good communication and the

transfer. The Project activities were mainly promoted through workshops gathering BPBD officers.

Then, the BPBDs officers themselves carried out actual activities such as the formulation of RDMP. For

BPBD officers who were not able to attend the workshops, local consultants and experts traveled to visit

them for follow-ups so that they could keep abreast of the progress of the Project.

－15－

Chapter 3: Review by the Five Criteria

3.1 Relevance

The relevance of the Project remains high.

(1) The new government has recently passed the new Middle-Term National Development Plan

2015-2019. The plan brings new hope to the people and the nation, as it puts emphasis on

enhancing the country’s political sovereignty and independence in economy and culture through

the implementation of Nawacita or the Nine Priority Programs. In line with the Nawacita, the

Middle-term Development Plan, often abbreviated as RPJMN, has also nine key priorities. A

number of priorities may greatly enhance disaster risk reduction efforts in Indonesia, as they

promise protection and security to all people, improvement of the quality of life, economic

independence, and stronger development intervention at the village level3.

(2) Issues related to disaster risk reduction have been specifically referred to in the new middle-term

development plan. In the part of RPJMN that elaborates the general direction of development in

2015-2019, it is mentioned that the national development will be geared, among others, towards

improving the quality of the environment, and the management of natural disaster mitigation and

climate change. This will be done through strengthening of the monitoring of the quality of the

environment, control of pollution and environmental degradation, enforcement of environmental

laws, disaster risk reduction, enhancement of the resilience of government and the people to

disaster, and increasing capacity in climate change mitigation and adaptation4.

(3) The relevance of the Project to the DRR policy in Indonesia remains high from the initial

planning survey in 2011 through the mid-term review in 2013. In accordance with the RPJMN,

National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019) is currently being developed, which will be the

basic reference on DRR policy for government institutions and relevant stakeholders. Disaster

Risk Index and RANPRB (National Action Plan for DRR) will be annexed to the National

Disaster Management Plan. Since its beginning in 2011, the Project continues to adjust its

outputs/activities in accordance with new legislation, which include the Head of BNPB regulation

such as Perka BNPB 8-2011 (Standardization of Disaster Data); Perka BNPB 2-2012 (General

Guideline on Disaster Risk Assessment for Disaster Management Planning); and Perka BNPB

1-2012 (General Guideline on Disaster Resilient Village). Accordingly, the Project has

sustained its relevance throughout the cooperation period. As for the Perka BNPB 2-2012, its

revision is currently ongoing, upon the completion of which the Technical Guideline for

formulation of RDMPs is also planned to be finalized.

3 Indonesia’s Country Paper for 3rd WCDRR. 2015 4 Ibid.

－16－

(4) National Progress Report on the Implementation of the Hyogo Framework Action (2013-2015) by

BNPB summarizes Indonesia’s efforts and current descriptions on disaster risk management.

The Project contributed to HFA’s three Strategic Goal Areas of Indonesia, which focuses on the

strengthening of disaster management planning at the provincial and district/city levels, the

strengthening of capacities of provincial and district/city disaster management agencies (BPBD)

and the promotion of disaster resilient villages, and the engagement of stakeholders in

contingency planning and disaster emergency response exercises.

(5) The selection of SULUT and NTB as target provinces is appropriate in that the Project meets the

needs and expectations of counterpart agencies (provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs) that

require capacity development to better prepare and respond to natural disasters. They had to

cope with natural disasters that occurred recently: the flood in Manado (17 Feb 2013), the flood in

Manado and Tomohon (15 Jan 2014), and the flood in Bitung (3-4 Feb 2015).

(6) The Project is aligned with the cooperation policy of Japan with Indonesia. Natural disaster and

its risk reduction are mentioned under the “building a sustainable and resilient international

community through efforts to address global challenges” – one of priority policies of the

Development Cooperation Charter decided by the Japanese Cabinet in February 2015.

Cooperation with respective country is still to be framed by Japan’s County Assistance Policy.

The one for Indonesia dated April 2012 maintains, as one of its three priority areas, that Japan

offers assistance for Indonesia to improve systems and organizations which take disaster

preventive measures. Accordingly, the Project is included in the Program for Improvement of

Disaster Management Capacity under the Rolling Plan which is attached to the County Assistance

Policy.

(7) Japan has also renewed its commitment to international cooperation on DRR under the Sendai

Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-20130) adopted on 18 March 2015. As

mentioned in the document A/CONF.224/CRP.1 “Given their different capacities as well as the

linkage between the level of support provided to them and the extent to which they will be able to

implement the present framework, developing countries require enhanced provisions of means of

implementation, including adequate, sustainable, and timely resources, through international

cooperation and global partnership for development, and continued international support, to

strengthen their efforts to reduce disaster risk” “International cooperation for disaster risk

reduction includes a variety of sources and is a critical element in supporting the efforts of

developing countries to reduce disaster risk. In addressing economic disparity and disparity in

technological innovation and research capacity among countries it is crucial to enhance

technology transfer involving a process of enabling and facilitating flows of skill, knowledge,

ideas, know-how and technology from developed to developing countries in the implementation of

－17－

the present framework” and “such vulnerability requires the urgent strengthening of

international cooperation and ensuring genuine and durable partnerships at the regional and

international levels in order to support developing countries to implement this framework in

accordance with their national priorities and needs”5.

3.2 Effectiveness

The effectiveness of the Project is high.

(1) The project is assessed as effective mainly because its activities are obtaining the expected

outputs as planned toward achieving the Project Purpose. Currently, the Project is making a firm

progress at each output in the 2nd target province of NTB, covering all the 10

regency/municipality BPBDs. By continuing the current activities, the Project is more likely to

attain its goal by the end of project period, November 2015. No immediate obstacles that would

keep the Project from achieving the set indicators in PDM are observed during the terminal

evaluation.

(2) There has been significant capacity development of the provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs at

the individual level through working with the processes of project implementation6. Through a

series of workshop and technical follow-up, regency/municipality BPBD officers have gained

knowledge on the comprehensive approach to DRR (prevention and preparedness, emergency

response, recovery and reconstruction) and specific measures to be taken at each phase, acquired

skills on disaster risk assessment, and eventually demonstrated what they had learned by

formulating RDMPs for themselves. More importantly, BPBD officers have recognized their

role/responsibility as the local DRR management agency, which leads to higher motivation to

work. Technical Guideline on RDMP was effective for providing BPBD officers with a

step-by-step instruction on how to prepare a RDMP. The Excel application to reduce omission

or mistakes in preparing RDMP was attached to the technical guideline. Such development of

capacity (increase of knowledge, skills and experiences) was widely appreciated by BPBD

counterparts during the terminal evaluation. BPBDs are of local government and not under the

administration of BNPB. BNPB, being responsible for providing technical assistance to BPBD,

also acknowledged the contribution of the Project to BPBDs capacity enhancement.

(3) Tangible outputs such as RDMPs, hazard maps, and various technical guidelines has enhanced

BPBD’s capacity at the organizational level in that BPBDs are now equipped with plans and

procedures (RDMPs for all and SOP for some BPBDs) as well as referential materials (technical

guideline). As for RDMP, it is desirable that the RDMP can be converted into the Head of Local

5 Ibid no. 2. 6 Capacity development takes place at three different levels: individual level, organizational level, and society/institutional level- Capacity Assessment Handbook (2008), JICA

－18－

Government Regulation (see the case of Bitung in 3.2 (6)). It is also necessary to see to it that

the RDMP is mainstreamed in local development plan (see the efforts of Tomohon in 3.2 (7)).

Of most importance is that RDMP is to be implemented by ensuring budget allocation. (see 3.2

(4), ～ 3.2 (8))

(4) Six technical guidelines will be completed in the Project. BNPB acknowledges these guidelines

useful, and currently considers how these documents to be adopted or approved when they are

completed. BNPB also consider distributing these guidelines to BPBDs widely at an occasion

of DRR day, scheduled in Solo (Central Java) in October 2015, as a part of activities for Output 5.

Output Produced Materials Current statusMost relevant

regulation

Output 1 Disaster Data and Information

Technical Guideline for Collecting and Storing Disaster Data/Information (Sep 2013)

Completed Perka BNPB 8-2011

Output 2 Hazard and Risk Maps

Technical Guideline for Creation of Hazard Map for Regencies/Municipalities (Ver. 2) (Sep 2013)

To be finalized with the NTB activity completion.

Perka BNPB 2-2012 currently under revision

Output 3-1 Regional Disaster Management Plan and Action Plan

Technical Guideline of Regional Disaster Management Plan for Kabupaten/Kota (Ver. 1.5) (Aug 2014)

To be finalized with the NTB activity completion

Perka BNPB 4-2008 currently under revision, National Disaster Management Plan (2015-2019) currently under formulation

Output 3-2 SOP and Contingency Plan

Technical Guideline for Formulation of SOP (May 2012)

Completed (eight Perka BPBD regultions)

Output 4-1 Disaster Management Drill and Exercise

Technical Guideline for Disaster Relief Exercise (Mar 2014)

Completed

Perka BNPB on disaster management exercise implementation still under formulation

Output 4-2 Community-based Disaster Risk Management

Activities for “Disaster Resilient Village” Program – As a Good Practice Model – (Ver.1.0) (Mar 2014)

To be finalized with the NTB activity completion

Perka BNPB 1-2012 and annual technical guidelines for disaster resilient village program

(5) In relation to the enhanced capacity of BPBD, they have become more capable of preparing the

budget, which is necessary for the implementation of RDMPs. The list of activities included in

RDMP helps BPBD to prepare the annual working plan (RKPD) and then, the budget

implementation document (DPA) in the local government.

－19－

Sketch on planning and budgeting of the local government

(6) Some BPBDs such as Bitung and Tomohon have already taken significant actions in preparing the

budget for implementing the RDMP. In this sense, they demonstrated what they had learned by

formulating RDMP themselves, and further applied to their actual work in budget preparation.

For example, BPBD Bitung has successfully raised the budget for DRR since 2013. This is

attributed to the BPBD Bitung actively communicating with relevant stakeholders (the local

parliament, the mayor, BPKP, and other local government agencies/department) on RDMP, and

establishing effective working relationship with them. This is one example where the capacity

development has taken place at the institutional level, not only confined to an organization or

some individuals.

1. BPBD drafted a local government regulation. The draft was eventually approved by the local parliament in September 2013 as local government regulation on disaster management – Bitung City Local Regulation No.25/2013 about the Implementation of Disaster Management. This regulation is to make sure that all government agencies in Bitung would consider disaster management issues in their own respective activities.

2. The mayor set up the Verification & Evaluation Team consisting of BAPPEDA, Division for Budgeting under BPK-BMD, Division for Development under SEKDA. This team is to make sure that all proposals from government agencies would include DRR and climate change issues.

3. BPBD consulted with BPKP (provincial local government auditor) and acquired new account numbers (i.e. identify existing account number or create new account number if necessary) in SIMDA system (which is managed by BPKP) for DRR activities based on the list of program/activities in the RDMP. (MoHA regulation 27/2014 allows the local government to allocate new activities which are not regulated previously in SIMDA.)

4. Some DRR activities with budget proposal prepared by BPBD were successfully approved by the local parliament, therefore BPBD total budget allocation is increasing from year to year.

5. Bitung had a Mayor regulation No 43/2014 – Procedure to provide and be responsible for unpredicted expenditure. During the flood in February 2014, response and recovery were required but budget was not allocated. Then, the mayor, the parliament, and budgeting team met together, cut some budget from agencies like PU, and put them together to finance emergency response activities.

RPJMD (5 year plan) Regional Disaster Management Plan (RDMP)

RENSTRA (5 year plan)

APBD (annual budget) DPA (budget implementation document)

local government each local government agency

RKPD (annual working plan)

SIMDA (financial information management system)

Planning

Budgeting

－20－

(7) Another case of enhanced capacity applied to actual work is BPBD Tomohon. They are trying

to work with BAPPEDA so that DRR would be mainstreamed in the next RPJMD, which will be

issued a new mayor takes office. (At more than half of all the regencies/municipalities, the

election of mayor is scheduled in December 2015.) Under the limited budget of the local

government in Tomohon, DRR has not necessarily been given a high priority in part because the

emergency funds which the BPBD can count on have been available at the central government.

Now the RDMP has provided the overall picture of DRR activities, which allows BPBD

Tomohon to discuss about priorities with more confidence.

(8) With such active efforts of regency/municipality BPBD, the budget of some BPBDs has actually

been increased. At provincial level, BPBD SULUT and NTB have been able to secure budget as

the Governors are supportive of DRR. Provincial BPBDs don’t have budget to directly support

the activities of regency/municipality BPBD, but provincial BPBD can implement their activities

at regency/municipality, thereby being capable of supporting regency/municipality BPBDs.

BPBD Total staff number activity budget (not including non-direct spending such as salary and office operation)

BPBD SULUT

increased from 80 to 100 Activity budgets are: 2 billion IDR (2014) and 8 billion IDR (2015). In 2015, BPBD will build a new four-floor building for an operation room and storehouse at the backyard of the same property.

BPBD Bitung

Total staff number decreased from 76 (2012) to 68 (2015). The number of permanent officers, however, is the same while more staff is being outsourced, whose number is currently stand at 28.

1.1 billion IDR (2012), 3.2 billion IDR (2013), 3.1 billion IDR (2014), 6.2 billion IDR (2015) In 2015, BPBD will purchase fire-fighting cars, construct a new logistic building, and conduct preparedness activity.

BPBD Tomohon

Total staff number has been the same at 66 (permanent 52, temporal 14) from 2012 through 2015, including fire fighters.

1.1 billion IDR (2012), 3.0 billion IDR (2013), 3.0 billion IDR (2014), 2.2 billion IDR (2015) In 2015, more budget was diverted to non-direct spending for salary increase.

BPBD NTB

Total staff number is constant at 63 (42 permanent and 21 temporal) increasingly reliant on temporal staff as the number of permanent officers is limited these days. Coordination is increasing.

Activity budget of BPBD NTB increased from 1.7 billion IDR (2014) to 6.5 billion IDR (2015) by about 400%. Priorities include enhancement of community participation & capacity, early prevention and victim management, disaster emergency preparedness, rehabilitation and reconstruction.

BPBD Sumbawa west

103 (permanent 24, temporal on contract 21, fire fighter 48 mostly on contract). BPBD established in 2010.

Total 2.0 billion IDR (2015). This also include travel fee for BPBD staff to attend the project workshop.

BPBD Lombok Central

Total 113: permanent 30, fire fighters 52 (permanent 27, temporal 25), quick response team 31 (all temporal) BPBD established in 2013

2.6 billion IDR (2013), 3.2 billion IDR (2014), 3.6 billion IDR (2015)

－21－

BPBD Lombok East

Total 82: permanent 52 (including 26 fire fighter), contract-base 30 (including 1 fire fighter). 80(2014), below 80 (2013)

10 billion (2015) including non-direct spending (e.g. salary). Major items are the purchase of fire-fighting car (3.9 billion IDR), Rehabilitation and reconstruction, training cost (0.1 billion IDR)

(9) At present, MoHA, administering local government, is intending to strengthen DRR activities of

the local government with new legislation. The category of activities and budget account system

for local government under MoHA regulations didn’t cover DRR, and this made it difficult for

BPBDs to prepare budget for DRR. Now DRR has become an obligation of local government

with the Law No.23-2014, the appendix of which describes the demarcation of works on disaster

management and fire-fighting between central, provincial, and regency/municipality government.

Furthermore, MoHA ministerial regulation No.27-2014 (with the Appendix point No. 19) on how

to prepare the budget for 2015, explains what is DRR (e.g. evacuation, emergency response), thus

prompting the local government to prepare budget for DRR activities. These descriptions are

still general , so MoHA is planning to issue another ministerial regulation with further

clarification and instruction on DRR within this year. MoHA even considers conducting training

on local government budget planning so that DRR activities can be properly accommodated in

SIMDA.

(10) Through the newly published Middle Term Development Plan 2015-2019, Indonesia has

committed itself to focus its development efforts from the periphery, from the village level.

Budget allocation for village governments has been approved through Law No. 6/2014 on Village,

and it is expected that bigger funds will trickle down from the central government to village

governments. In agreement with the new development strategy, DRR stakeholders will make

use of this opportunity to increase village and community-based DRR initiatives7.

(11) Based on the experience of project activities, many disaster exercises were conducted voluntarily

by BPBDs in SULUT as already reviewed at the Project Purpose indicators. In particular, the

CPX in October 2013 organized by BPBD SULUT were also covered widely by the media such

as Manado Post, Pacific-TV (local TV station based in Manado), TV LI (national TV station),

Metro TV (Indonesia’s news channel). BPBD SULUT is also initiating cooperation with

Telkomsel (mobile network operator in Indonesia) in recognition of the importance of

disseminating disaster information effectively.

7 Ibid no 3

－22－

(12) At the time of actual disasters, some BPBDs were able to better respond due to the Project

particular in terms of disaster data collection and coordination among agencies.

BPBD Events/date BPBD’s response in relation to Project activities/outputs

BPBD SULUT

Flash flood in Manado in Jan 2014

・ Outputs of the Project (data collection format, hazard maps) were useful.

・ Coordination among agencies were easier and smoother because of workshop (BPBD SULUT doesn’t have SOP yet and plans to prepare a SOP in 2016)

BPBD Bitung Flood in 5-10 Feb 2015

・ Due to intensive socialization conducted before, some heads of villages started responding quickly.

・ Division of responsibility as described in SOP helped the emergency response go smoothly.

・ The reporting format prepared by the project was used.

・ Bitung municipality set up the operation room in BPBD. Bitung conducted most of response activities on their own with budget, and asked little to BNPB.

BPBD Manado

Flood Jan 2014

・ The data format was helpful for BPBD Manado to collect flood information at Dasa level.

(13) Apart from RDMPs, the hazard and risk map, the first official map of its kind at

regency/municipality level in the target provinces, are widely appreciated by BPBDs. BPBDs

shared the developed maps with other relevant agencies such as PU, TNI, PVMBG, and PMKG.

Some BPBD officers said the maps being precise made them more confident to share those with

other agencies, whereas other BPBD officers mentioned the maps were too technical and not easy

to understand. One concern raised at the Mid-term review was how the creation of hazard map

with GIS equipment would be sustained by the provincial BPBD since the work had been mainly

conducted by GIS engineers contracted by the Project. When activities in SULUT were

completed in March 2014, the GIS equipment was handed over to the BPBD SULUT dated on 28

March 2014. Two BPBD officers have since been assigned to the GIS sections together with 1

GIS engineer on contract basis. They used GIS equipment and managed to produce a relocation

map in 2014. They also have some specific budget allocated to buy consumables such as toner

and printing paper. As such, BPBD SULUT is putting their efforts to sustain the GIS corner. It

is desirable that provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs can make these maps by themselves and

that the prepared maps can be agreed by all SKPD. It is also necessary that the prepared maps

are socialized to communities in danger.

－23－

(14) Followings are the recommendation made at the mid-term review in September 2013, and their

response in the Project to the present.

Area Recommendation Response 1. Remaining

Activities in North Sulawesi Province

Kab/Kota BPBDs to participate in the workshop and complete the formulation of RDMPs by March 2014.

Workshop was conducted twice after the Mid-term review (Sep 2013 and Mar 2014). The formulation of RDMPs was completed in all Kab/Kota in SULUT by November 2014 due to follow-up activities.

Efforts for RDMPs to be approved by local authorities.

All 14 RDMPs in SULUT were already approved by BPBDs. 9 out of 14 were also approved by mayor.

Implementation of disaster risk reduction measures based on RDMPs with cooperation between BPBDs and relevant authorities.

Bitung is implementing activities based on RDMP in 2015 in good cooperation with relevant agencies. Tomohon is also able to implement activities based on RDMP, but disaster management are not given high priority under the current limited city budget.

Follow up by JICA Expert Team for remaining activities in North Sulawesi Province.

Local consultant visited 10 Kab/Kota in SULUT in May and October 2014 to help BPBDs complete the RDMP formulation.

2. Implementation Policy of the 2nd half of the Project

Following approaches to be considered. (1) Focus on a mechanism to

strengthen capacity of BNPB and the Assistant Team

(2) Reconsideration of the methodology of implementing activities in the 2nd pilot province, in accordance with BNPB’s policy.

BPBD used to promote RDMP formulation at Kab/Kota level utilizing national consultants, which were supervised by BNPB Assistant Team. This dissemination approach of BNPB, however, has been halted for a while. In the meantime, the Project has conducted activities in NTB with the same implementation arrangement as those in SULUT.

3. Modification of the Project Design Matrix (PDM)

Addition to PDM of following activities (Outputs) Mechanism for

nationwide dissemination of Outputs of the Project is enhanced.

(Activities) ・ Utilizing the Technical

Guideline. ・ Strengthening the capacity of

BNPB, Assistant Team, province/regency/municipality BPBD, involving national consulting firms.

The output and relevant activities were added to PDM upon approval at the 4th JCC in April 2014. The dissemination mainly focuses on: 1) the utilization of the Technical

Guideline for Formulation of RDMP; and

2) the methodology of earthquake hazard map

4. Collaboration with relevant agencies

Relevant agencies such as PU, BMKG, RISTEK, BPPT, LIPI and CVGHM to be added as members of JCC to promote cross sectorial coordination

The 4th JCC in April 2014 were attended by relevant agencies such as PU, BPPT, PVMBG, PPKK, and PMI. Invitation was actually sent out to other agencies as list in the recommendations.

－24－

3.3 Efficiency

The efficiency of the Project to date is high.

(1) The Project has been implemented without encountering major obstacles (such as described in the

Important Assumptions in PDM), and has been undertaken efficiently. The purpose and

activities of the Project are well understood among those who are participated in the Project.

Official and daily communication among project team and counterpart have been good. JCC

meeting has been held 4 times (18 Jan 2012, 11 Jul 2012, 12 Sep 2013, and 3 Apr 2014). The

project team was based in the target province (at Manado in SULUT and Mataram in NTB), but

efforts of the team to visit or stay in Jakarta for reporting and consulting with BNPB regularly

have kept the Project Managers at BNPB well informed.

(2) Counterpart training in Japan (September 2012 and August 2014) can be highlighted as

particularly effective to inspire counterpart. There were many positive remarks by those who

had participated in the training, saying that the training was eye-opening, having them conscious

about disaster prevention and preparedness for the first time, and having them realized how much

communities/residents could do for themselves for disaster management. It was also pointed out

that the timing of the training was helpful to prepare budget for the next fiscal year based on what

was learned in Japan. For example, BPBD NTB, soon after coming back from the training in

Japan in September 2014, explained the governor about mainstreaming disaster management in

policies. Then, the governor wrote a letter to BAPPEDA to take that into consideration in

preparing 2015 budget, which consequently increased by 400% for BPBD NTB. For the budget

of 2016, BPBD NTB already plans to prepare a proposal on disaster management to be discussed

at MUSRENBANG at provincial level.

(3) Contribution of the local consultants in the project team is significant and highly commended by

Japanese experts and by counterparts. Working with 2 provincial BPBDs and all the 15 and 10

regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT and NTB, respectively, in close cooperation with BNPB

in Jakarta, requires lots of efforts for communication, consultation and follow-up. The number

of counterparts reaches almost 400 (31 from BNPB, 246 from BPBDs in SULUT and 115 from

BPBDs in NTB). Keeping all the counterparts informed of and engaged in project activities

would not be possible without dedicated efforts of local consultants. On the other hand,

targeting all the regencies/municipalities in target provinces are beneficial for BPBD officers to

have opportunities for exchanging information and learning among themselves. For example, at

a workshop, BPBD officers of Sitaro and Tomohon were able to discuss about volcano disaster

management. It has also caused healthy competitive spirit among BPBD staff.

－25－

(4) At the mid-term review, some BPBDs in SULUT expressed that the limited budget was a

constraint, which kept them from traveling and attending the workshop held by the Project in

Manado. All regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT shouldered expenses for travel in

accordance with the MOU on Cost Sharing for Holding Workshops, signed between BPBD

SULUT and the Project in October 2012. Such arrangement ought to be acknowledged as a

remarkable contribution from Indonesian side to project implementation. This was raised,

however, as a hindering factor for project implementation by some BPBDs that were not able to

cover the expense due to the inflexibility of local budgeting. On the other hand, this

arrangement was not raised as an issue in NTB partly because they made themselves better

prepared for project implementation. For example, BPBD West Sumbawa prepared such budget

for 2014 soon after the Project visited their office in June 2013 and explained project activities.

(5) One notable hindering factor mentioned is the frequent transfer of counterpart, though this hasn’t

significantly affected the project implementation. Project Director changed twice due to the

transfer of the Deputy of Prevention and Preparedness BNPB (August 2013 and October 2014).

At provincial/regency/municipal BPBDs in SULUT, there were many transfers of directors, too.

Additional explanation of tasks to successors was necessary, and attention was paid so that the

involvement of staff in the Project would be consistent. For example, out of the 15 district/city

BPBDs in SULUT, 8 directors changed from October 2012 to September 2013. 6 out of the 8

transferred BPBD directors actually attended the counterpart training in Japan. This means that

the effects of the training might not be returned to the Project.

(6) Japanese side proposed the Basic Approach in its inception report for effective/efficient

implementation of the Project and technology transfer. Proposed approaches were carried out as

follows while the Project being implemented.

Basic Approach What actually worked in the Project What didn’t work in the Project

1

Focus on assistance in capacity development and implementation of capacity assessment

・ JICA Project Team basically provided only advice, inputs, through WSs and follow up activities to the CPs, and most of actual works had been done by CPs themselves, this methodology contributed to enhance their capacity.

・ Not all CPs are active and motivated and this cause difference in level of understanding among CPs.

・ CPs are changed quite frequently and need extra time to catch up with new CPs.

2

Assuring sustainability looking ahead of the end of the Project

・ Through implementation of the most fundamental and indispensable activities at the local level, their capacity enhanced for the pilot area by prioritizing capacity development.

・ In order to ensure achievement of overall goal of the project, how to effectively utilize methodology applied in the project is not yet been decided with BNPB.

－26－

3 Implementation of effective technical transfer by understanding the relationships between each output

・ Necessity of Components covered in this project are well matched with BNPB policy and well understood by the local BPBDs.

・ Outputs are correlated each other, and CPs are also coordinated with other Outputs CPs for effective implementation of the project.

・ None

4

Implementation of efficient and steady technical transfers by holding regular workshops

・ Technical Transfer to CPs for each output is given step-by-step through series of WSs, and this method was effective to cover all Kab/Kota in the pilot area.

・ For the activity in NTB, for most of outputs, 2 times of WSs were held by island (for Lombok Island, and Sumbawa Island separately) and it also helped to increase level of participation to the WSs.

・ Due to limitation of budget of each Kab/Kota, some of Kab/Kota has difficulty coming to WSs, especially having distance from the Capital (however, not to left them behind individual follow up activities were implemented.)

5 Promotion of establishment of technical transfer committee consists mainly of primary universities

・ Involvement of relevant organizations and local university was promoted in the project and shared data to relevant authorities and organizations to ensure sustainability.

・ Recently, BNPB started to utilize major University separated by target disasters for their involvement and this will continue for the future.

・ This methodology was not accepted at the beginning of the project due to policy of BNPB has not been fixed.

6 Ensure the quality of project outputs by developing clearly comprehensive manuals

・ Development of Technical Guidelines (change title from Manual to Technical Guideline considering Indonesian document hierarchy) was effective since there were no detail documents to be able to utilize and understand by local governments and can be utilized at other region.

・ Activity at pilot area was conducted by utilizing Technical Guideline formulated through implementation of activity at the 1st pilot area, and matured and revised the contents through implementation of 2nd Pilot area through discussion with BNPB.

・ Not yet officially ensured to use as official documents by BNPB

7 Implementation of effective public relations activities

・ Periodical Issuance of Newsletter was effective to disseminate and share the progress of the project among CPs, relevant organizations.

・ HP of the project was helped to disseminate progress and achievement of the project as well as share materials provided in the project.

・ SNS such as Facebook was utilized to share information of holding WSs, Seminars, and other events, and effective to receiving confirmation of attendance in advance, to handle great number of CPs in the project.

・ None

－27－

3.4 Impacts

The impact of the Project is medium.

(1) A key positive impact, which is the progress towards achieving the Overall Goal - disaster

management capacities of provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs beside the target areas are

enhanced - has not really been observed as yet at the time of terminal evaluation. So far, the

Project has been quite successful within the target province of SULUT and NTB, but impact

beyond the target province is yet to be made. Output 5 (dissemination of technical guideline on

RDMP formulation) was added to PDM to bridge between the Project Purpose and the Overall

Goal at the time of Mid-term review. BNPB highly regarded the outputs of the Project and

confirmed that they would disseminate the outputs to other provinces once they were finalized

and approved. With such confirmation of BNPB, it is expected that activities of Output 5 will

bring about more impact during the remaining project period. Furthermore, the Project is

aligned and concurrent with BNPB’s initiatives and activities (e.g. formulation of RDMP at

regency/municipality level, Disaster Resilient Village Program, etc), and hence can cause many

positive impacts in future.

(2) There are some remarkable events/presentations conducted by the Project and counterpart as

follows based on the activities and experience of the Project:

・ In recognition of the activities of the Project, Joint Seminar on Volcanic Activity and

Enhancement of Disaster Management Capacity in North Sulawesi Province was conducted on 24

may 2013 at Manado. The Seminar was organized by BNPB, North Sulawesi BPBD and JICA

Project Team with significant participants such as the Governor of North Sulawesi Province,

Head of PVMBG, Director of Water Resources in PU, Director of Preparedness in BNPB, Kyoto

University, and Kagoshima Prefecture.

・ Presentation at a JICA side event of Asia Ministerial Conference on DRR (23 June 2014,

Thailand)

・ Presentation at WCDRR Sendai, Japan (14-18 March 2015) as “Mainstreaming DRR into

Development through practical DM Planning at the Local Level: Lessons Learned from BNPB

and JICA initiatives in Indonesia” and “Building Resilience at the Local Level: Experiences from

Indonesia and Japan”

(3) Based on the experience of the Project, BPBD SULUT is taking initiative to promote DRR

activities with relevant organizations by signing MOUs as below.

－28－

Agency which MOU was signed with by BPBD SULUT

Date of signature

Activities of BPBD SULUT

PKK (women’s group) February 2014 PKK are conducting many social activities at community level. BPBD may use that opportunity to disseminate DM knowledge.

Provincial DINAS (agency) of education

October 2014 BPBD may come to high school to disseminate some knowledge on DM. Target is 100 high school while no specific budget is prepared at BPBD.

IPDN Manado (school for government staff)

March 2015 BPBD may come to IPDN Manado and give lectures to the students of future leaders.

(4) BNPB is promoting many activities; for example, 1) preparation of a strategy plan this year for

DRR movement inviting private sector and NGO, 2) development of a project in a small island

for cluster coordination with relevant ministries/agencies and to organize communities, 3)

formulation of five master plans (Tsunami, Flood, Volcano Eruption, Earthquake, Landslide) to be

attached to the National Disaster Management Plan, and each master plan is being supported by

respective university for risk assessment, 4) development of the substance of training module at

the Ina-DRTG to fully utilize the training center, 5) organizing regular meetings where BPBDs

convene three times a year (Technical Coordination Meeting, Scientific Meeting for DRR, and

DRR Month)

3.5 Sustainability

The prospect of sustainability of the Project is high with precondition.

(1) With regard to BPBDs surveyed in the terminal evaluation in SULUT and NTB (two provincial

BPBDs and regency/municipality BPBDs in Bitung, Tomohon, Manado, Central Lombok, East

Lombok, Mataram), the prospect of sustainability is high. Through the Project, the capacity of

some BPBDs is enhanced at not only the individual or organizational level, but also at the

institutional level. It should be note, however, that such prospect of sustainability may vary with

different leadership, willingness of the government, and governing the risk at local levels are very

challenging. It will be vary also for other regency/municipality BPBDs in accordance with the

level of their capacity, which is summarized in the Capacity Assessment Report in SULUT

compiled in the Project in December 2014 (Also, the same capacity assessment for

regency/municipality BPBDs in NTB in currently ongoing.) Concerning the CBDRM

conducted in the two pilot villages (Desa Moyag in Kotamobagu and Kelurahan Bebali in Sitaro),

the continuation of activities is not clear because these two regencies were not visited during the

terminal evaluation. BNPB intends to mainstream DRR at the local level, and their supports to

BPBDs are expected in accordance with RPJMN (2015-2019) and upcoming NDMP (2015-2019).

Observation and analysis from four viewpoints (institutional, technical, human resource,

financial) are described below.

－29－

(2) Institutional viewpoint

The national and international policy environments are instrumental in promoting DRR and

extending project benefits/activities. The statement at WCDRR by the vice-president of

Indonesia in March 2015 maintains that Indonesia has been investing in disaster prevention,

mitigation, and preparedness and that it is now becoming their top list priority. The RPJMN

(2015-2019) puts high priority to DRR as public investment. The National Disaster

Management Plan (2015-2019), currently being prepared to align with the RPJMN, is expected to

have specific targets such as reducing existing risk and preventing new disaster risks. As such,

the institutional and regulatory framework for DRR in Indonesia has been increasingly

strengthened. This includes BNPB regulations and particularly MoHA regulations for

regency/municipality BPBDs.

BNPB and BPBDs meet three times a year regularly as the following table. The provincial

BPBD and regency/municipality BPBDs also meet twice a year by holding a technical

coordination meeting at the provincial BPBD. The communication and coordination will be

better sustained using such opportunities.

Meeting Time Main Agenda Technical coordination meeting

Early year General meeting of BNPB and BPBDs

Scientific meeting for DRR

May-June Researchers in Ministries and Indonesia Disaster Expert Association discuss on the concept/science of DRR

DRR Month October Chance for socialization of DRR activities and results

The coordination and cooperation of BPBD with relevant stakeholders are also being

strengthened at local level. Some cases of such good coordination by BPBDs in the target

provinces are as described in the previous sections such as cooperation in emergency response,

sharing of hazard map, and preparation of budget. There is also a case of national level

coordination. For example, in Sumbawa West, 135 evacuation sign and 20evacuation points

were installed in 2015 in a BPBD project. Concurrently, PU will build some three-stories shelter

along the Nusa Tenggara Timor coast in 2016.

(3) Technical viewpoint

Activities in outputs such as the development of RDMPs are more likely to be sustained as

these RDMPs are formulated by regency/municipality BPBD staff themselves through working

with the processes of project implementation, rather than contracted out to external entities such

as consulting companies. Not just learning how to formulate RDMP but also demonstrating

their learning by actually creating RDMP until its approval has led to significant capacity

development of BPBD staff. At some BPBDs, the enhanced capacities have been applied to

actual work such as budget preparation, voluntary disaster management exercises, and response to

－30－

natural disaster events.

How the activities of creating and revising hazard and risk maps with GIS equipment

continue to be a concern even after the arrangement set up at BPBD SULUT (i.e. hand-over of the

GIS equipment, assignment of staff to GIS corner, and budget). Some agencies are likely to

have better GIS technical capacities than BPBD SULUT (e.g. BAPEDA for special planning, PU

for flood control, BMKG for weather forecast, Sam Ratulangi University of North Sulawesi for

academic use). The data on disaster risk assessment for GIS can be shared with these

institutions towards possible collaboration on creating or revising hazard maps. There may be

the same concern in BPBD NTB, but they seem to better handle GIS due to more exposure to

development projects before as well as more available budget.

(4) Human Resources viewpoint

The capacity of BPBD counterpart has been remarkably increased through the Project.

Continuous involvement, after the Project, of BPBD counterpart in the same disaster management

activities cannot be counted on because transfer of BPBD staff is common. However,

clarification of duty/tasks of BPBD, increased understanding and awareness of staff on DRR in

general, and development of basic referential materials such as RDMP have all contributed to the

increased sustainability of BPBD human resource as a whole. Knowledge sharing among BPBD

colleagues is increasing and collaboration with other organization such as Red Cross is being

realized at local level. Training opportunities of BPBD staff are increasing as more BPBDs have

managed to secure training budget as planned in RDMP (BNPB has training and BPBD secure

some budget for their staff to travel and participate in the training). Furthermore,

regency/municipality BPBDs have seen the increase of staff in general, both permanent and

temporal, since its establishment.

(5) Financial viewpoint

The sustainability from financial viewpoint is promising for BPBDs. BNPB does not have

an administrative responsibility over BPBDs which are a part the local government under MoHA.

BNPB primarily supports BPBDs through setting policies and guidelines, granting

equipment/facilities, and imparting technical skills/knowledge in many aspects of DRR. As for

MoHA, they used to prepare a ministerial regulation that would allow the local government to use

1% of APBD for DRR, but this idea was already discarded. Instead, MoHA has prepared the

Law No.23-2014 and the ministerial regulation No.27-2014, thereby enforcing the local

government to promote DRR activities with budget. Furthermore, MoHA is considering another

ministerial regulation, within this year, to secure the preparation of budget for DRR in the local

government financial information management system, SIMDA.

－31－

Chapter 4: Recommendation

4.1 Conclusion of the Review by the Five Criteria

The relevance of the Project remains high, aligned with government policies on DRR such as the

Law No.24-2007, RPJMN (2015-2019), and relevant BNPB’s regulations though the National Disaster

Management Plan (2015-2019) is still under finalization. The effectiveness of the Project is high

because the Project is making a firm progress, and by continuing the current activities as planned, it is

more likely that the Project Purpose will be achieved by the end of cooperation period, November 2015.

The efficiency of the Project is assessed also high as the Project has not encountered major obstacle that

could seriously hinder the project implementation. The impact of the Project is medium at present.

Advancement towards the Overall Goal based on the achievements of the Project to date has not really

been realized as yet, but activities for the extension of project outputs are ongoing, and BNPB’s

commitment to utilize project outputs are clear. The prospect of sustainability is high with preconditions

for the provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs in SULUT and NTB while BNPB and MoHA are

promoting DRR into the local level.

4.2 Recommendations

4.2.1 Completion of all project activities.

The Project is to achieve the Project Purpose by November 2015 by continuing planned activities

while paying particular attention to the following.

・ Wrap-up workshop in NTB scheduled in September 2015 is to be planned as most effective to share

experience and knowledge among BNPB and province/regency/municipality BPBDs from NTB as

well as from SULUT. Tambora can be considered a good option for socialization of DRR among

relevant agencies and the media.

・ The approval or authorization of six technical guidelines (e.g. Technical Guideline for formulation of

RDMP) in accordance with relevant BNPB regulations is necessary for these tangible outputs to be

effectively disseminated and utilized for the enhancement of regency/municipality BPBDs beyond

the target provinces.

・ The annual BPBD general meeting in October 2015 needs to be a good occasion for activities of

Output 5. For example, distributing the technical guideline with training seminar, sharing good

practice of target regency/municipality BPBDs with others, providing lectures on DRR planning and

budgeting based on MoHA legislation, can be considered as a part of agenda..

－32－

4.2.2 Promotion and implementation of regency/municipality RDMP

In order to implement RDMP, following actions (indicative) should be undertaken as necessary by

provincial and regency/municipality BPBDs, referring to the good practices of some BPBDs as described

in previous sections.

・ Communication on the RDMP with cooperating authorities/agencies such as the local parliament,

mayors, local government organs such as in health and public works, army, police, and NGOs for

implementing RDMP.

・ Budget preparation based on RDMP while communicating with relevant authorizes/agencies in line

with MoHA regulations so that the budget on DRR to be duly prioritized and properly

accommodated in SIMDA.

・ Socialization of hazard and risk maps to agencies with GIS technical capacities (e.g. BAPEDA, PU,

BMKG, Sam Ratulangi University of North Sulawesi) for possible collaboration on creation/revision

of GIS map based on disaster risk assessment.

4.2.3 Discussion with BNPB on the way-forward to the Overall Goal

Way-forward to the Overall Goal based on the achievements of the Project requires discussions with

and engagement of BNPB on top of some activities undertaken as Output 5. Exceedingly competing

duties/time of BNPB counterparts have made their involvement in the Project rather limited than initially

expected even though their engagement in the Project is clear. Still, the way-forward is to be agreed

during the remaining project period toward achieving the overall goal. This is also important from the

viewpoint of sustainability of project outputs. Utilization of technical guideline and methodology such

as creating hazard maps is one of the essentials for enhancing the disaster management capacity of BNPB

and BPBDs, and it will not be sustained without a long-term perspective and multi-faceted approach.

・ Utilization of technical guideline as a part of training module in Ina-DRTG, after these guideline are

authorized, can be considered.

・ BNPB can assist BPBDs to mainstream DRR into the local government development plan. Also,

BNPB can liaise with MoHA to support BPBDs preparing budget for DRR.

・ The guideline for the Standard Operation Procedures (SOP) had been made, including Output 3-2

which can be implemented for other locations in Indonesia. Drill and exercise with related

characteristic can be replicated to other districs involving more stakeholders in DRR.

・ Gender mainstreaming and vulnerable groups should be more involved in CBDRM and drill exercise

for better resilience of the community in local level.

・ The involvement of the all local stakeholders, including the government for Community

Development and Private Sectors will be important as part of the output for the programs.

・ The Risk Reduction Index should be utilized as part of evaluation measurement tool to reduce

disaster risks significantly over the period of middle-phase development, as the RPJMN has stated.

－33－

4.3 Lessons Learned

(1) Training in Japan was repeatedly mentioned very fruitful by those participated, some of whom

had been highly inspired and taken great initiative to promote DRR activities in their provinces

and regencies. Regarding DRR technical cooperation, training in Japan seems to have the best

advantage the participants can learn compared with training in other third countries.

(2) Counterpart from the 1st target province (SULUT) actively participated in the 2nd target province

(NTB) activities. He shared his experience in the Project and relevant achievement with the

counterpart in NTB. Thus, counterpart from preceding target areas can become a resource person

for activities in following target areas, and this can be included in a project design from the

beginning.

(3) Efforts of some BPBDs were significant in this Project. It is important to consider, in early stage

of a project, how such exemplary efforts at local level, when emerged, can be disseminated and

extended nationwide.

(4) In this Project, local disaster management agencies (BPBDs) are not under the line administration

of Central disaster management agency (BNPB). BPBDs belong to the local government, which

is under MoHA. In other countries, local disaster management is undertaken by the local branch

of the central disaster management agency (e.g. Office of Civil Defense in the Philippines).

Such difference of administrative arrangement of DRR institution is to be taken into consideration

and reflected in the project design.

Appendices

A.1 PDM Ver.2 A.2 Plan of Operation Ver.2 A.3 Schedule of the Terminal Evaluation A.4 List of Interviewees A.5 Dispatch of Japanese Experts A.6 Provision of Equipment A.7 Counterpart Training A.8 Assignment of Counterpart Personnel A.9 Operation Budget A.10 Result Grid (Achievement of Indicators) A.11 List of Documents developed in the Project A.12 Evaluation Grid (Information and Data for the 5 Criteria) A.13 Signed Minutes of Meeting

A-1

Ap

pen

dix

1:

Pro

ject

Des

ign

Mat

rix

(PD

M)

(Dra

ft)

(Ver

.2)

Dat

e: 3

Ap

ril

2014

P

roje

ct N

ame:

The

Pro

ject

for

Enh

ance

men

t of

the

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Cap

acit

y of

BN

PB

and

BP

BD

P

roje

ct T

erm

: 201

1 -

2015

(fo

ur y

ears

) Ta

rget

are

a (p

ilot

pro

vinc

es):

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi P

rovi

nce

(Man

ado

Mun

icip

alit

y an

d ot

her

rege

ncie

s/m

unic

ipal

itie

s), W

est

Nu

sa T

engg

ara

Pro

vinc

e (M

atar

am M

unic

ipal

ity

and

othe

r re

genc

ies/

mun

icip

alit

ies)

Ta

rget

gro

up: N

atio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent A

genc

y (B

NP

B);

at l

east

two

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Age

ncie

s (B

PB

Ds)

of

two

prov

ince

s: N

orth

Sul

awes

i Pro

vinc

e, W

est

Nu

sa T

engg

ara

Pro

vinc

e; a

nd th

e R

egen

cy/M

unic

ipal

ity

BP

BD

s in

the

targ

et a

rea

(pil

ot p

rovi

nces

)

Nar

rati

ve S

umm

ary

Ver

ifia

ble

Indi

cato

rs

Mea

ns o

f V

erif

icat

ion

Impo

rtan

t Ass

umpt

ions

O

vera

ll G

oal

The

pro

vinc

ial B

PB

Ds

as w

ell a

s th

e re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

BP

BD

s be

side

the

targ

et a

reas

are

est

abli

shed

, and

the

disa

ster

man

agem

ent c

apac

itie

s of

them

are

en

hanc

ed b

y us

ing

mat

eria

ls f

orm

ula

ted

an

d m

eth

odol

ogy

esta

bli

shed

in th

e pr

ojec

t.

The

num

ber

of p

rovi

nces

as

wel

l as

rege

ncie

s/m

unic

ipal

itie

s th

at a

pply

the

met

hodo

logi

es e

stab

lish

ed in

the

Pro

ject

for

ac

cum

ulat

ing

disa

ster

dat

a, c

reat

ing

haza

rd a

nd r

isk

map

s,

form

ulat

ing

regi

onal

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t pla

n an

d co

nduc

ting

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t exe

rcis

e.

1. I

nter

view

s w

ith

the

BN

PB

and

BP

BD

st

aff

Dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t fr

amew

ork

by c

urre

nt

disa

ster

-rel

ated

org

aniz

atio

ns

as w

ell a

s di

sast

er-r

elat

ed

poli

cy in

Ind

ones

ia r

emai

ns

unch

ange

d.P

roje

ct P

urpo

se

The

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t cap

acit

ies

of B

NP

B, t

he p

rovi

ncia

l BP

BD

s, a

nd th

e re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

BP

BD

s in

the

targ

et a

rea

are

enha

nced

. 1.

Num

ber

or C

ases

that

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n (R

DM

P)

form

ulat

ed th

roug

h th

e P

roje

ct p

roce

ssed

to

app

rove

by

the

loca

l aut

hori

ty.

2. N

umbe

r of

vol

unta

ry d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

co

nduc

ted

in t

he

com

mu

nit

ies

wit

hin

th

e ta

rget

are

a.

1. P

rovi

nce

or

Reg

ency

/mun

icip

alit

y ac

know

led

gem

ents

2. B

NP

B o

r B

PB

D r

epor

ts, n

ewsp

aper

ar

ticl

es o

n th

ese

case

s, o

r in

terv

iew

ing

the

com

mun

ity

BN

BP

exte

nds

its

acti

viti

es in

th

e ta

rget

are

a to

oth

er

prov

inci

al B

PB

Ds,

re

genc

ies/

mun

icip

alit

ies

outs

ide

the

targ

et a

reas

.

Out

puts

1.

The

cap

acit

y fo

r th

e re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

BP

BD

s to

acc

umul

ate

disa

ster

da

ta/i

nfor

mat

ion

whi

ch a

re f

unda

men

tal f

or d

isas

ter

risk

man

agem

ent a

nd

impr

ove

accu

racy

of

such

dat

a/in

form

atio

n in

the

targ

et a

rea

is e

nh

ance

d.

2. T

he

cap

acit

y fo

r cr

eati

on o

f H

azar

d an

d ri

sk m

aps

at r

egen

cy/m

unic

ipal

ity

leve

l in

the

targ

et a

rea

is e

nh

ance

d.

3. T

he

cap

acit

y fo

r fo

rmu

lati

on o

f R

egio

nal d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent p

lans

for

re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

in th

e ta

rget

are

a is

en

han

ced

. 4.

Th

e ca

pac

ity

for

con

du

ctin

g D

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

at t

he

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y in

the

targ

et a

rea

is e

nh

ance

d.

5.

Nat

ionw

ide

dis

sem

inat

ion

act

ivit

ies

are

imp

lem

ente

d.

1-

1.A

ccum

ulat

ion

of d

isas

ter

data

item

s (N

ewly

acc

umul

ated

si

nce

ther

e ar

e no

exi

stin

g da

ta)

in t

he

targ

et a

rea.

1-

2.Im

prov

emen

t of

disa

ster

dat

a qu

alit

y (B

y fo

llow

ing

the

form

at, d

ata

are

suff

icie

ntly

acc

umul

ated

) in

th

e ta

rget

ar

ea.

2-1.

Num

ber

of th

e re

genc

ies/

mun

icip

alit

ies

whe

re h

azar

d an

d ri

sk m

aps

at r

egen

cy/m

unic

ipal

ity

leve

l are

cre

ated

in th

e ta

rget

are

a.

3-1.

Num

ber

of th

e re

genc

ies/

mun

icip

alit

ies

whe

re r

egio

nal

disa

ster

man

agem

ent p

lans

are

for

mul

ated

at

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y le

vel i

n th

e ta

rget

are

a.

4-1.

Num

ber

of d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

impl

emen

ted

in th

e ta

rget

are

a.

4-2.

Num

ber

of a

ctiv

itie

s on

CB

DR

M in

the

targ

et a

rea.

5-

1.T

ech

nic

al G

uid

elin

e fo

r fo

rmu

lati

on o

f R

DM

P is

u

tili

zed

as

refe

ren

ce d

ocu

men

ts o

f B

NP

B

5-2.

Nu

mb

er o

f ev

ents

to

sup

por

t n

atio

nwid

e d

isse

min

atio

n a

ctiv

itie

s on

for

mu

lati

on o

f R

DM

P

1-

1. P

roje

ct r

epor

ts

1-2.

Pro

ject

rep

orts

2-1.

Pro

ject

rep

orts

3-1.

Pro

ject

rep

orts

4-1.

Pro

ject

rep

orts

4-

2. P

roje

ct r

epor

ts

5-1.

Pro

ject

rep

orts

5-

2. P

roje

ct r

epor

ts

Act

ivit

ies

1-1.

To s

tudy

con

tent

s of

dis

aste

r da

ta/i

nfor

mat

ion

to b

e ac

quir

ed a

nd

accu

mul

ated

at a

regi

onal

leve

l (re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

leve

l) in

the

targ

et a

rea

base

d on

the

less

ons

lear

ned

from

the

JIC

A S

tudy

, "T

he S

tudy

on

Nat

ural

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent i

n In

done

sia

(the

JIC

A S

tudy

)" in

ord

er to

est

abli

sh

form

at f

or s

hari

ng d

isas

ter

data

1-

2.To

stu

dy n

eces

sary

dat

a ite

ms

as w

ell a

s da

ta f

orm

at to

be

shar

ed a

nd in

form

ed

to th

e pr

ovin

cial

BPB

Ds

from

the

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

ality

BPB

Ds

in th

e ta

rget

ar

ea, a

nd in

form

ed to

the

BN

PB fr

om th

e pr

ovin

cial

BPB

Ds

in th

e ta

rget

are

a in

or

der t

o es

tabl

ish

the

met

hodo

logy

for

acc

umul

atin

g ne

cess

ary

data

Inpu

ts(1

) T

rain

ed s

taff

con

tinu

es to

w

ork

for B

NP

B o

r BP

BD

. (2

) St

atus

of

disa

ster

m

anag

emen

t pla

n re

mai

ns u

ncha

nged

. (3

) R

elat

ion

amon

g th

e re

leva

nt o

rgan

izat

ions

re

mai

ns u

ncha

nged

. (4

) In

form

atio

n is

sha

red

wit

hin

the

Pro

ject

team

(Ind

ones

ian

side

) 1.

Ass

ignm

ent o

f co

unte

rpar

t per

sonn

el (

C/P

) -P

roje

ct D

irec

tor

(P/D

) fr

om B

NP

B (

Dep

uty

Chi

ef f

or

Pre

vent

ion

and

Pre

pare

dnes

s)

-Pro

ject

Man

ager

s (P

/Ms)

fro

m B

NP

B (

Dir

ecto

r fo

r D

isas

ter

Ris

k R

educ

tion

, Dir

ecto

r fo

r D

isas

ter

Pre

par

edn

ess,

Hea

d

of D

ata,

In

form

atio

n a

nd

Pu

bli

c R

elat

ion

Cen

ter,

D

irec

tor

for

Com

mu

nit

y E

mp

ower

men

t)

(Jap

anes

e si

de)

1. D

ispa

tch

of th

e Ja

pane

se e

xper

ts

-Chi

ef a

dvis

or/ C

ompr

ehen

sive

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t -R

egio

nal d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent p

lann

ing

(1)

- R

egio

nal

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t p

lan

nin

g (2

)

Mod

ifica

tions

are

und

erlin

ed a

nd in

bol

d.

A-2

1-3.

To f

orm

ulat

e “T

ech

nic

al g

uid

elin

e fo

r ac

quir

ing

and

accu

mul

atin

g di

sast

er

data

/ inf

orm

atio

n fo

r re

gen

cies

/mu

nic

ipal

itie

s”

1-4.

To a

cqui

re a

nd a

ccum

ulat

e di

sast

er d

ata/

info

rmat

ion

in th

e in

th

e 1st

tar

get

ar

ea u

sing

the

form

at d

evel

oped

thro

ugh

the

Pro

ject

1-

5.To

list

the

disa

ster

dat

a ac

cum

ulat

ed in

the

in t

he

1st t

arge

t ar

ea in

to th

e di

sast

er a

nnua

l rep

ort

2-1.

To s

tudy

and

ver

ify

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

"th

e m

anua

l for

cre

atio

n of

haz

ard

and

risk

map

s", d

evel

oped

thro

ugh

the

JIC

A S

tudy

. 2-

2.To

for

mu

late

“T

ech

nic

al g

uid

elin

e fo

r cr

eati

on o

f h

azar

d m

aps

for

rege

nci

es/m

un

icip

alit

ies”

2-

3.To

col

lect

and

cla

rify

bas

ic d

ata

incl

udin

g st

atis

tics

, soc

ial d

ata,

dat

a on

na

tura

l con

diti

ons

2-4.

To c

reat

e ha

zard

and

risk

map

s ba

sed

on th

e da

ta a

ccum

ulat

ed th

roug

h O

utpu

t 1

as w

ell a

s ba

sic

data

col

lect

ed in

Act

ivit

y 2-

3 2-

5.To

pla

n di

sast

er m

itig

atio

n m

easu

res

base

d on

the

haza

rd a

nd r

isk

map

s cr

eate

d th

roug

h A

ctiv

ity

2-4

as w

ell a

s th

e le

sson

s le

arne

d fr

om th

e R

egio

nal

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n (R

DM

P)

deve

lope

d th

roug

h th

e JI

CA

Stu

dy

3-1.

To f

orm

ula

te “

Tec

hn

ical

gu

idel

ine

for

form

ula

tion

of

regi

onal

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t p

lan

for

reg

enci

es/m

un

icip

alit

ies”

. 3-

2.To

stu

dy a

bout

rev

isio

n of

Sta

ndar

d O

pera

tion

Pro

cedu

re (

SO

P)

used

co

mm

only

by

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y in

ord

er to

pre

pare

sta

ndar

d m

anua

l and

fo

rmul

ate

“Tec

hn

ical

gu

idel

ine

for

form

ulat

ion

of S

OP

for

rege

nci

es/m

un

icip

alit

ies”

3-

3.To

col

lect

and

cla

rify

bas

ic d

ata

incl

udin

g st

atis

tics

, soc

ial d

ata,

dat

a on

na

tura

l con

diti

ons

nece

ssar

y fo

r fo

rmul

atin

g R

DM

Ps

for

the

targ

et a

rea

3-4.

To

form

ula

te R

DM

Ps

and

Reg

ion

al A

ctio

n P

lan

s fo

r D

isas

ter

Ris

k

Red

uct

ion

(D

RR

) fo

r th

e ta

rget

are

a 3-

5.T

o fo

rmu

late

or

revi

se S

OP

in t

he

1st t

arge

t ar

ea

3-6.

To

revi

se t

he

exis

tin

g S

OP

acc

ordi

ng to

em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

pla

n of

the

RD

MP

form

ulat

ed th

roug

h th

e A

ctiv

ity

3-4

in t

he

1st t

arge

t ar

ea

3-7.

To

prom

ote

offi

cial

app

rais

al b

y re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

of R

DM

P fo

rmul

ated

th

roug

h A

ctiv

ity

3-4

4-1.

To s

tudy

exi

stin

g do

cum

ents

for

impl

emen

tati

on o

f di

sast

er m

anag

emen

t ex

erci

ses

4-2.

To f

orm

ulat

e “T

ech

nic

al g

uid

elin

e fo

r im

plem

enti

ng d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent

exer

cise

s fo

r re

gen

cies

/mu

nic

ipal

itie

s”

4-3.

To im

plem

ent d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

in th

e 1st

tar

get

area

toge

ther

w

ith

nati

onal

leve

l org

aniz

atio

ns

4-4.

To

revi

se “

Tec

hn

ical

gu

idel

ine

for

imp

lem

enti

ng

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t ex

erci

ses

for

rege

nci

es/m

un

icip

alit

ies”

as

wel

l as

SO

Ps

base

d on

the

resu

lt o

f th

e di

sast

er m

anag

emen

t exe

rcis

e if

nec

essa

ry

4-5.

To c

ondu

ct a

ctiv

itie

s on

CB

DR

M to

em

pow

er d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent

ca

paci

ty u

tili

zing

out

put f

orm

ulat

ed th

roug

h th

e P

roje

ct

5-1.

To

imp

rove

Tec

hn

ical

gu

idel

ine

for

form

ula

tion

of

RD

MP

to

be

uti

lize

d

as r

efer

ence

doc

um

ent

of B

NP

B

5-2.

To

par

tici

pat

e ev

ents

hos

ted

by

BN

PB

to

exp

lain

eff

ecti

ve u

tili

zati

on o

f th

e T

ech

nic

al G

uid

elin

e fo

r fo

rmu

lati

on o

f R

DM

P

5-3.

To

give

inp

ut

for

form

ula

tion

of

dis

aste

r ri

sk a

sses

smen

t te

chn

ical

gu

idel

ine

for

rege

nci

es/m

un

icip

alit

ies

5-4.

To

pro

mot

e th

e m

eth

odol

ogy

dev

elop

ed in

Ou

tpu

t 2

Act

ivit

y 2.

2 es

pec

iall

y on

Ear

thq

uak

e H

azar

d

-Pro

ject

Coo

rdin

ator

(A

dmin

istr

atio

n) f

rom

BN

PB

(D

irec

tor

for

Bur

eau

for

Law

s an

d C

oope

rati

on)

-Out

put 1

: Te

am L

eade

r (D

eput

y C

hief

of

Dis

aste

r In

form

atio

n,

Div

isio

n of

Inf

orm

atio

n C

ente

r) a

nd n

eces

sary

num

ber

of

staf

f fr

om B

NP

B, a

nd n

eces

sary

num

ber

of s

taff

fro

m

BP

BD

in th

e pi

lot p

rovi

nces

) -O

utpu

t 2:

Te

am L

eade

r (S

ub-d

irec

tor

of P

reve

ntio

n) a

nd n

eces

sary

nu

mbe

r of

sta

ff f

rom

BN

PB

, and

nec

essa

ry n

umbe

r of

sta

ff

from

BP

BD

in th

e pi

lot p

rovi

nces

) -O

utpu

t 3:

Te

am L

eade

r (S

ub-d

irec

tor

of M

itig

atio

n/S

ub-d

irec

tor

of

Pre

vent

ion)

and

nec

essa

ry n

umbe

r of

sta

ff f

rom

BN

PB

, and

ne

cess

ary

num

ber

of s

taff

fro

m B

PB

D in

the

pilo

t pr

ovin

ces)

D

eput

y Te

am L

eade

r (S

ub-d

irec

tor

of R

espo

nse

Pla

nnin

g an

d ne

cess

ary

num

ber

of s

taff

fro

m B

NP

B, a

nd n

eces

sary

nu

mbe

r of

sta

ff f

rom

BP

BD

in th

e pi

lot p

rovi

nces

)

-Out

put 4

:

Team

Lea

der

(Sub

-dir

ecto

r of

Res

ourc

e P

repa

redn

ess)

and

ne

cess

ary

num

ber

of s

taff

fro

m B

NP

B, a

nd n

eces

sary

nu

mbe

r of

sta

ff f

rom

BP

BD

in th

e pi

lot p

rovi

nces

) D

eput

y Te

am L

eade

r (S

ub-d

irec

tor

of C

omm

unit

y E

mpo

wer

men

t) a

nd n

eces

sary

num

ber

of s

taff

fro

m B

NP

B,

and

nece

ssar

y nu

mbe

r of

sta

ff f

rom

BP

BD

in th

e pi

lot

prov

ince

s)

2. P

rovi

sion

of

faci

lity

and

equ

ipm

ent

-Pro

ject

off

ice

spac

e -O

ther

exp

ense

s 3.

Ope

rati

on b

udge

t -P

erso

nnel

exp

ense

s as

wel

l as

allo

wan

ce f

or C

/P

-Exp

end

itu

re t

o h

old

JC

C a

nd

oth

er e

ven

ts in

Jak

arta

-O

ther

exp

ense

s

-Dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t ins

titu

tion

and

or

gani

zati

on

-Em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

pla

nnin

g -D

isas

ter

info

rmat

ion

syst

em

-Dis

aste

r m

itig

atio

n m

easu

res

(flo

od,

land

slid

e, d

roug

ht, d

estr

ucti

ve w

ind,

fo

rest

fir

e)

-Dis

aste

r m

itig

atio

n m

easu

res

(ear

thqu

ake,

tsun

ami,

volc

anic

er

upti

on)

-Dat

abas

e/ G

IS

-Dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t exe

rcis

e (1

) -D

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ise

(2)

-Com

mun

ity

base

d di

sast

er r

isk

man

agem

ent

-Cap

acit

y D

evel

opm

ent

-Coo

rdin

ator

/sup

port

of

the

expe

rt in

co

mm

unit

y ba

sed

disa

ster

ris

k m

anag

emen

t 2.

Pro

visi

on o

f eq

uipm

ent

-Tra

inin

g to

ols

and

mat

eria

ls

-PC

for

pre

pari

ng h

azar

d an

d ri

sk m

aps,

pr

inte

r, G

IS s

oftw

are,

plo

tter

, sat

elli

te

imag

e, a

nd

IF

SA

R d

ata

3. C

ount

erpa

rt tr

aini

ng

-Nec

essa

ry n

umbe

r of

sta

ff is

trai

ned

in

Japa

n on

ce a

yea

r. T

he s

taff

is s

elec

ted

from

BN

PB

as

wel

l as

the

prov

inci

al

and

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y B

PB

Ds

in th

e ta

rget

are

a.

suff

icie

ntly

.

Pre

-con

diti

ons

(1)

Des

truc

tive

dis

aste

r w

hich

may

gre

atly

af

fect

to th

e sm

ooth

op

erat

ion

of th

e P

roje

ct d

oes

not o

ccur

be

fore

the

Pro

ject

is

com

plet

ed.

(2)

Reg

ular

BN

PB

and

B

PBD

off

icia

ls a

re

assi

gned

to th

e Pr

ojec

t un

der

gove

rnm

ent

orde

r be

fore

the

Proj

ect s

tart

s.

A-3

Ap

pen

dix

2:

Pla

n o

f O

per

atio

n V

er.2

Im

plem

enta

tion

poli

cy w

ith

BN

PB

Act

ivit

y in

the

1st p

ilot

pro

vinc

e of

SU

LU

TA

ctiv

ity

in th

e 2nd

pil

ot p

rovi

nce

of N

TB

20

11

2012

2013

20

14

2015

A

ctiv

ity

Jul -Sep

Oct -Dec

Jan -Mar

Apr -Jun

Jul -Sep

Oct -Dec

Jan -Mar

Apr -Jun

Jul -Sep

Oct -Dec

Jan -Mar

Apr -Jun

Jul -Sep

Oct -Dec

Jan -Mar

Apr -Jun

Jul -Sep

Oct -Nov

1-1

To s

tudy

con

tent

s of

dis

aste

r da

ta/i

nfor

mat

ion

to b

e ac

quir

ed a

nd a

ccum

ulat

ed a

t a r

egio

nal l

evel

(re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

leve

l) in

the

targ

et a

rea

base

d on

the

less

ons

lear

ned

from

the

JIC

A S

tudy

“T

he S

tudy

on

Nat

ural

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t in

Indo

nesi

a (t

he J

ICA

Stu

dy)”

in o

rder

to e

stab

lish

for

mat

for

sha

ring

dis

aste

r da

ta.

1-2

To

stu

dy n

eces

sary

dat

a it

ems

as w

ell a

s da

ta f

orm

at to

be

shar

ed a

nd in

form

ed to

the

prov

inci

al B

PB

Ds

from

the

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

ality

BP

BD

s in

the

targ

et a

rea,

and

info

rmed

to th

e B

NP

B f

rom

the

prov

inci

al B

PBD

s in

the

targ

et a

rea

in o

rder

to e

stab

lish

the

met

hodo

logy

for

acc

umul

atin

g ne

cess

ary

data

.

1-3

To f

orm

ulat

e “T

echn

ical

gui

deli

ne f

or a

cqui

ring

and

acc

umul

atin

g di

sast

er d

ata/

info

rmat

ion

for

rege

ncie

s/m

unic

ipal

itie

s”

1-4

To a

cqui

re a

nd a

ccum

ulat

e di

sast

er d

ata/

info

rmat

ion

in th

e 1st

targ

et a

rea

usin

g th

e fo

rmat

dev

elop

ed th

roug

h th

e Pr

ojec

t.

1-

5 To

list

the

disa

ster

dat

a ac

cum

ulat

ed in

the

1st ta

rget

are

a in

to th

e di

sast

er a

nnua

l rep

ort.

2-1

To s

tudy

and

ver

ify

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

“th

e m

anua

l for

cre

atio

n of

haz

ard

and

risk

map

s”, d

evel

oped

thro

ugh

the

JIC

A S

tudy

.

2-

2 To

for

mul

ate

“Tec

hnic

al g

uide

line

for

crea

tion

of

haza

rd m

aps

for

rege

ncie

s/m

unic

ipal

itie

s”

2-3(

1) T

o co

llec

t and

cla

rify

bas

ic d

ata

incl

udin

g st

atis

tics

, soc

ial d

ata,

dat

a on

nat

ural

con

diti

ons

in S

UL

UT.

2-

3(2)

To

coll

ect a

nd c

lari

fy b

asic

dat

a in

clud

ing

stat

isti

cs, s

ocia

l dat

a, d

ata

on n

atur

al c

ondi

tion

s in

NT

B

2-4(

1) T

o cr

eate

haz

ard

and

risk

map

s ba

sed

on th

e da

ta a

ccum

ulat

ed th

roug

h O

utpu

t 1 a

nd w

ell a

s ba

sic

data

col

lect

ed in

A

ctiv

ity

2-3

in S

UL

UT.

2-4(

2) T

o cr

eate

haz

ard

and

risk

map

s ba

sed

on b

asic

dat

a co

llec

ted

in A

ctiv

ity

2-3

in N

TB

.

2-

5(1)

To

plan

dis

aste

r m

itig

atio

n m

easu

res

base

d on

the

haza

rd a

nd r

isk

map

s cr

eate

d th

roug

h A

ctiv

ity

2-4

as w

ell a

s th

e le

sson

s le

arne

d fr

om th

e R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

(RD

MP

) de

velo

ped

thro

ugh

the

JIC

A S

tudy

in S

UL

UT.

2-5(

2) T

o pl

an d

isas

ter

mit

igat

ion

mea

sure

s ba

sed

on th

e ha

zard

and

ris

k m

aps

crea

ted

thro

ugh

Act

ivit

y 2-

4 as

wel

l as

the

less

ons

lear

ned

from

the

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n (R

DM

P)

deve

lope

d th

roug

h th

e JI

CA

Stu

dy in

NT

B.

3-1

To

form

ulat

e “T

echn

ical

gui

delin

e fo

r fo

rmul

atio

n of

reg

iona

l dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t pla

n fo

r re

genc

ies/

mun

icip

alit

ies”

.

3-

2 To

stu

dy a

bout

rev

isio

n of

SO

P us

ed c

omm

only

by

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y in

ord

er to

pre

pare

sta

ndar

d m

anua

l and

fo

rmul

ate

“Tec

hnic

al g

uide

line

for

form

ulat

ion

of S

OP

for

rege

ncie

s/m

unic

ipal

itie

s”.

3-3(

1) T

o co

llec

t and

cla

rify

bas

ic d

ata

incl

udin

g st

atis

tics

, soc

ial d

ata,

dat

a on

nat

ural

con

diti

ons

nece

ssar

y fo

r fo

rmul

atin

g R

DM

Ps

for

the

targ

et a

rea

in S

UL

UT.

3-3(

2) T

o co

llec

t and

cla

rify

bas

ic d

ata

incl

udin

g st

atis

tics

, soc

ial d

ata,

dat

a on

nat

ural

con

diti

ons

nece

ssar

y fo

r fo

rmul

atin

g R

DM

Ps

for

the

targ

et a

rea

in N

TB

.

3-4(

1) T

o fo

rmul

ate

RD

MPs

and

Reg

iona

l Act

ion

Pla

ns f

or D

isas

ter

Ris

k R

educ

tion

(D

RR

) fo

r th

e ta

rget

are

as in

SU

LU

T.

3-4(

2) T

o fo

rmul

ate

RD

MPs

and

Reg

iona

l Act

ion

Pla

ns f

or D

isas

ter

Ris

k R

educ

tion

(D

RR

) fo

r th

e ta

rget

are

as in

NT

B.

3-5

To f

orm

ulat

e or

rev

ise

SO

P in

the

1st ta

rget

are

a.

3-6

To r

evis

e th

e ex

isti

ng S

OP

acco

rdin

g to

em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

pla

n of

the

RD

MP

form

ulat

ed th

roug

h th

e A

ctiv

ity

3-4

in th

e 1st

targ

et a

rea.

3-7(

1) T

o pr

omot

e of

fici

al a

ppra

isal

by

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y of

RD

MP

form

ulat

ed th

roug

h A

ctiv

ity

3-4

in S

UL

UT.

3-7(

2) T

o pr

omot

e of

fici

al a

ppra

isal

by

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y of

RD

MP

form

ulat

ed th

roug

h A

ctiv

ity

3-4

in N

TB

.

4-

1 To

stu

dy e

xist

ing

docu

men

ts f

or im

plem

enta

tion

of d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

.

4-

2 To

for

mul

ate

“Tec

hnic

al g

uide

line

for

impl

emen

ting

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t exe

rcis

es f

or r

egen

cies

/mun

icip

aliti

es”

4-3

To im

plem

ent d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

in th

e 1st

targ

et a

rea

toge

ther

wit

h na

tion

al le

vel o

rgan

izat

ions

.

4-

4 To

rev

ise

“Tec

hnic

al g

uide

line

for

impl

emen

ting

disa

ster

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

for

reg

enci

es/m

unic

ipal

itie

s” a

s w

ell a

s S

OP

s ba

sed

on th

e re

sult

of

the

disa

ster

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ise

if n

eces

sary

.

4-5(

1) T

o co

nduc

t act

ivit

ies

on C

BD

RM

to e

mpo

wer

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t cap

acit

y ut

iliz

ing

outp

ut f

orm

ulat

ed th

roug

h th

e P

roje

ct in

SU

LU

T.

4-5(

2) T

o co

nduc

t act

ivit

ies

on C

BD

RM

to e

mpo

wer

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t cap

acit

y ut

iliz

ing

outp

ut f

orm

ulat

ed th

roug

h th

e P

roje

ct in

NT

B.

5-1

To im

prov

e Te

chni

cal g

uide

line

for

for

mul

atio

n of

RD

MP

to b

e ut

iliz

ed a

s re

fere

nce

docu

men

t of

BN

PB

.

5-

2 To

par

tici

pate

eve

nts

host

ed b

y B

NPB

to e

xpla

in e

ffec

tive

util

izat

ion

of th

e Te

chni

cal G

uide

line

for

form

ulat

ion

of R

DM

P.

5-

3 To

giv

e in

put f

or f

orm

ulat

ion

of d

isas

ter

risk

ass

essm

ent t

echn

ical

gui

delin

e fo

r re

genc

ies/

mun

icip

alit

ies.

5-

4 To

pro

mot

e th

e m

etho

dolo

gy d

evel

oped

in O

utpu

t 2 A

ctiv

ity

2.2

espe

cial

ly o

n E

arth

quak

e H

azar

d.

Pro

ject

Man

agem

ent A

ctiv

ities

- R

/D (

on 1

1 Ju

ly 2

011)

and

JC

C (

18 J

an 2

012,

11

Jul 2

012,

)

Mid

-ter

m R

evie

w

Term

inal

Eva

luat

ion

A-4

Ap

pen

dix

3: S

ched

ule

of

the

Ter

min

al E

valu

atio

n

N

o D

ate

Lea

der

/ Sur

vey

Pla

nnin

g / C

BD

RM

/ D

RR

Pol

icy

Eva

luat

ion

& A

naly

sis

Indo

nesi

an E

valu

ator

1st

A

pr

5 S

un

15

:55

Arr

ival

at J

akar

ta (

NH

855

)

2nd

6 M

on

10

:00

Mee

ting

wit

h B

NP

B a

nd th

e jo

int e

valu

atio

n m

embe

r 15

:30

TV

Mee

ting

at J

ICA

Ind

ones

ia

10:0

0 M

eeti

ng w

ith

BN

PB

and

the

join

t eva

luat

ion

mem

ber

3rd

7

Tue

08:0

0 H

eari

ng w

ith

Min

istr

y of

Hom

e A

ffai

rs

15:0

0 M

ove

to th

e A

irpo

rt f

or M

anad

o (G

A60

6 1

8:30

-22:

50)

4th

8 W

ed

10

:00

Inte

rvie

w w

ith

BP

BD

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi P

rovi

nce

and

BP

BD

Kot

a M

anad

o 13

:40

Inte

rvie

w w

ith

BP

BD

Kot

a B

itun

g

5th

9 T

hu

10

:00

Inte

rvie

w w

ith

BP

BD

Tom

ohon

13

:00

Mov

e to

the

Air

port

for

Jak

arta

(G

A60

1 1

6:15

-18:

25)

6th

10

Fri

08:0

0 M

ove

to A

irpo

rt f

or L

ombo

k (G

A43

0 1

0:50

-13:

55)

15:3

0 D

iscu

ssio

n w

ith

JIC

A P

roje

ct T

eam

(al

l out

puts

)

7th

11

Sat

Rep

ort P

repa

rati

on

13:0

0 D

iscu

ssio

n w

ith

JIC

A P

roje

ct T

eam

8th

12

Sun

Rep

ort P

repa

rati

on

9th

13

M

on

09

:00

Inte

rvie

w w

ith

BP

BD

NT

B

10

th

14

Tue

06:3

0 M

ove

to B

PB

D W

est S

umba

wa

12

:00

Inte

rvie

w w

ith

BP

BD

Wes

t Sum

baw

a

11th

15

Wed

10:1

0 In

terv

iew

wit

h B

PB

D C

entr

al L

ombo

k

12

th

16

Thu

A

rriv

al a

t Lom

bok

via

Jaka

rta

NH

855

(10:

10 –

15:

55)

and

GA

432

(18:

10 –

21:

55)

09:3

0 P

arti

cipa

tion

to W

S f

or O

utpu

t 3 (

RD

MP

)

13th

17

Fri

10

:00

Vis

it to

BP

BD

Eas

t Lom

bok

for

foll

ow-u

p of

Out

put 2

A

rriv

al a

t Lom

bok

via

Jaka

rta

NH

855

(10:

10 –

15:

55)

and

GA

432

(18:

10 –

21:

55)

14th

18

Sat

09

:00

Par

tici

pati

on in

Eva

cuat

ion

Dri

ll f

or O

utpu

t 4 (

CB

DR

M)

15

th

19

Sun

09

:00

Sit

e vi

sit t

o N

orth

Lom

bok

Pre

para

tion

of

eval

uati

on r

epor

t

16th

20

Mon

09

:00

Cou

rtes

y C

all t

o B

PB

D N

TB

11

:15

Inte

rvie

w w

ith

Kot

a M

atar

am

13:0

0 M

ove

to a

irpo

rt f

or J

akar

ta (

GA

433

14:

40-1

5:40

)

17th

21

Tue

08

:30

Cou

rtes

y C

all t

o B

NP

B S

ecre

tary

Gen

eral

09

:15

Dis

cuss

ion

on E

valu

atio

n R

epor

t wit

h B

NP

B

09:1

5 D

iscu

ssio

n on

Eva

luat

ion

Rep

ort w

ith

BN

PB

18

th

22

Wed

10

:00

Dis

cuss

ion

wit

h Jo

int E

valu

atio

n M

embe

r 14

:00

Fin

aliz

atio

n of

the

Eva

luat

ion

Rep

ort

10:0

0 D

iscu

ssio

n w

ith

Join

t Eva

luat

ion

Mem

ber

14:0

0 F

inal

izat

ion

of th

e E

valu

atio

n R

epor

t 19

th

23

Thu

09

:00

5th J

CC

and

sig

ning

of

M/M

15

:30

Rep

ort t

o E

mba

ssy

of J

apan

09

:00

5th J

CC

and

sig

ning

of

M/M

20th

24

Fri

08

:30

Rep

ort t

o JI

CA

Ind

ones

ia

18:3

0 M

ove

to th

e A

irpo

rt (

NH

856

21:

35)

21th

25

Sat

07

:00

Arr

ival

at H

aned

a (0

7:00

)

A-5

Appendix 4: List of Interviewees

1 Indonesian Side

1) Counterpart Organizations

1 Mr. D. Wisnu Widjaja Deputy Chief for Prevention and Preparedness, BNPB 4/6,21 2 Mr. Lilik Kurniawan Director of Disaster Risk Reduction, BNPB 4/6,21 3 Ms. Anny Isgiati Director of Community Empowerment, BNPB 4/6,21 4 Mr. Medi Herliano Director of Preparedness, BNPB 4/6,21

5 Mr. Mohammad Masduki Director, Directorate of Prevention and Disaster Management, Directorate General of Public Government, MoHA

4/7

6 Mr. Hartono, SH Head of Sub Directorate Identification Disaster Potential, Directorate of Prevention and Disaster Management, Directorate General of Public Government, MoHA

4/7

7 Mr. Yoga Wiratama MoHA 4/7 8 Mr. Joko Sadono MoHA 4/7 9 Mr. Afif MoHA 4/7 10 Mr. Evan MoHA 4/7 11 Mr. Noldy W.D. Liow Head of BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 12 Mr. Lahida Division Head for Rehabilitation & Reconstruction, BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 13 Mr. Christian Laotongan Sub-Division Head for Emergency Response, BPBD North Sulawesi (GIS) 4/8 14 Mr. Jimmy Mokolensang Head of Division I (Prevention & Preparedness) , BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 15 Mr. Tenny Tompodoung BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 16 Mr. Jantya Lakoy BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 17 Ms. Evie Palandeng Sub Division of community empowerment (GIS), BPBD North Sulawesi 4/8 18 Mr. Priyanka Permadi (GIS engineer on contract basis) 4/8 19 Ms. Jeane J. Bangonang BPBD Manado 4/8 20 Mr. Jeffry Wowiling Head of Environmental Agency, Bitung (Former Head of BPBD Bitung) 4/8 21 Mr. Alfindo Mongkol Head of Sub Division (Finance), BPBD Bitung 4/8 22 Mr. Herman L. Makalew Secretary of BPBD Bitung 4/8 23 Mr. J.R. Kalangi Head of BPBD Tomohon 4/9 24 Mr. Franny M. Tulung Head of Division (Emergency Response & Logistic), BPBD Tomohon 4/9 25 Mr. Willem Runtukahu Head of Division (Rehabilitation & Reconstruction) BPBD Tomohon 4/9 26 Mr.Wedha Magma Ardhi Head of BPBD West Nusa Tenggara 4/13,20 27 Mr. Tholib Abdullah Head of BPBD West Sumbawa 4/14 28 Mr. Lalu Nurpuri Head of BPBD Central Lombok 4/15 29 Mr. Sahabudin Secretary of BPBD Central Lombok 4/15 30 Mr. Lalu Zamzuri Head of Prevention & Preparedness, BPBD Central Lombok 4/15 31 Mr. I Gusti Ngurah Pariawan BPBD Mataram 4/20 32 Mr. Husni Imam Sanusi BPBD Mataram 4/20 33 Mr. Iqbal BPBD Mataram 4/20 34 Mr. Dody Ruswandi Secretary General, BNPB 4/21 35 Ms.Tri Utami H Risk Management Analyst – DRR BNPB 4/22 36 Ms.Lilis Siti Mutmainnah Non Structural Mitigation Analyst – DRR BNPB 4/22 37 Mr. Aminudin Hamzah Structural Mitigation Analyst – BNPB 4/22

2 Japanese Side

1) Project

1 Mr. Ichiro KOBAYASHI Chief Advisor 4/6-23 2 Ms. Ryoji TAKAHASHI Deputy Chief Advisor, Output 1, Output 3-1, 3-2, Output 4-1, Output 5 4/6-23 3 Mr. Tandiono Chen Local Consultant 4/6-23 4 Ms. Marisa Mei Ling Local Consultant 4/6-23 5 Ms. Miki KODAMA Output 4-2 4/10-23 6 Mr. Akihiro FURUTA Output 2 4/10-23 7 Mr. Kenji MORITA Output 2 4/10-23 8 Ms. Azusa MATSUI Capacity Development 4/10-18 9 Mr. Katsu KATO Output 3-1 4/10-23 10 Ms. Yoko OTA Project Coordination 4/10-23 11 Mr. Andre Jaya Local Consultant 4/10-20 12 Mr. Mujiburrahman Local Consultant 4//18-20

2) JICA Office

1) Mr. Hideki Katayama Advisor (Disaster Management and Water Resources), JICA Indonesia Office 4/6

A-6

Ap

pen

dix

5:

Dis

pat

ch o

f Ja

pan

ese

Exp

erts

A

s of

Apr

il 2

015

Nam

e D

urat

ion

in I

ndon

esia

(da

ys o

f st

ay)

Tot

al

Day

s 1st

FY

N

ov 2

011–

Mar

201

2

2nd F

Y

Apr

201

2 –

Mar

201

3 3rd

FY

A

pr 2

013

– M

ar 2

014

4th

FY

A

pr20

14 –

Mar

201

5 5th

FY

A

pr 2

015-

1 Ic

hiro

KO

BA

YA

SH

I C

hief

Adv

isor

/ C

ompr

ehen

sive

di

sast

er m

anag

emen

t

11/2

8-12

/21

(24)

5/28

-6/1

4 10

/8-1

0/25

(1

8)

(18)

4/15

-4/2

6 5/

13-6

/14

9/9-

9/12

(12)

(33) (5

)

6/15

-24

(10)

4/5-

4/25

(2

1)

141

2 R

yoji

TA

KA

HA

SH

I D

eput

y C

hief

Adv

isor

/ R

egio

nal

disa

ster

man

agem

ent p

lann

ing

11/2

4-12

/23

1/11

-1/3

1 (3

0)(2

1)3/

14-4

/12

6/19

-7/1

8 9/

24-1

0/18

11

/26-

12/2

0 20

13/1

/24-

2/22

(30)

(3

0)

(25)

(2

5)

(30)

5/13

-6/6

8/

25-9

/26

12/9

-12/

24

3/10

-4/1

2

(25)

(33)

(16)

(30)

6/11

-6/2

5 10

/9-1

1/7

1/7-

1/30

(15)

(30)

(24)

4/1-

4/30

(3

0)

394

3 N

obor

u IK

EN

ISH

I D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent I

nsti

tuti

on

and

Org

aniz

atio

n 11

/28-

12/2

3 (2

6)

4/16

-5/4

6/

18-7

/17

(19)

(3

0)

75

4 O

sam

u IS

OD

A

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Ins

titu

tion

an

d O

rgan

izat

ion

10

/22-

11/6

1/

29-2

/26

(16)

(2

9)

45

5 K

iyot

aka

OW

AD

A

Em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

pla

nnin

g

11/2

8-12

/23

2/2-

3/2

(26)

(30)

4/23

-5/2

6 7/

4-7/

18

10/1

-10/

30

1/6-

2/5

(34)

(1

5)

(30

) (3

1)

5/6-

5/25

8/

18-8

/30

3/26

-4/1

2

(20)

(12)

(18)

21

6

6 M

akot

o IK

ED

A

Dis

aste

r in

form

atio

n sy

stem

12

/1-1

2/23

3/

26 -

4/24

(2

3)(3

0)6/

27 -

7/18

10

/2 -

10/2

5 2/

3 -2

/28

(22)

(2

4)

(26)

8/21

-9/1

4 3/

23-4

/12

(25)

(21)

171

7 K

enic

hiro

KA

TO

D

isas

ter

mit

igat

ion

mea

sure

s (f

lood

, la

ndsl

ide,

dro

ught

, des

truc

tive

win

d,

fore

st f

ire)

11/2

8-12

/23

1/17

-2/1

5 (2

6)(3

0)4/

9-4/

27

6/27

-7/1

1 10

/8-1

1/6

(19)

(1

5)

(30)

12

0

8 Is

ao M

ISO

NO

D

isas

ter

mit

igat

ion

mea

sure

s (f

lood

, la

ndsl

ide,

dro

ught

, des

truc

tive

win

d,

fore

st f

ire)

2013

/1/2

4-2/

27

(35)

4/

15-5

/17

(33)

68

9 K

enji

MO

RIT

A

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t (fl

ood,

la

ndsl

ide,

dro

ught

, des

truc

tive

win

d,

fore

st f

ire)

12/1

6-12

/24

3/10

-4/5

(9

)(2

7)6/

11-6

/25

9/2-

10/2

1/

12-1

/28

(15)

(31)

(17)

4/7-

4/24

(1

7)

116

10

Sug

io I

MA

MU

RA

D

isas

ter

mit

igat

ion

mea

sure

s (e

arth

quak

e, ts

unam

i, vo

lcan

ic

erup

tion

)

12/6

-12/

23

2/20

-3/2

0 (1

8)(3

0)6/

3-7/

17

10/8

-11/

3 1/

13-2

/2

(45)

(2

7)

(21)

4/15

-5/3

0 3/

23-4

/12

(46)

(21)

6/15

-6/2

6 11

/12-

11/2

6 1/

11-1

/27

(12)

(15)

(17)

252

11

Aki

hiro

FU

RU

TA

D

atab

ase

/ GIS

1

12/6

-12/

23

3/26

-4/2

1 (1

8)(2

7)7/

3-7/

17

10/8

-11/

5 1/

13-2

/5

3/11

-3/2

4

(15)

(2

9)

(24)

(1

4)

5/6-

6/6

12/9

-12/

24

3/24

-4/1

9

(32)

(16)

(27)

6/11

-6/2

7 9/

2-10

/2

11/1

6-12

/10

1/12

-1/1

8

(17)

(31)

(25) (7

)

4/7-

4/24

(1

7)

299

12

Ang

elit

o A

rjon

a D

atab

ase

/ GIS

2

20

13/3

/18-

7/1

(tot

al60

)

60

13

Yuu

ichi

NA

KA

MU

RA

Dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t dri

ll (

1)

12/1

-12/

23

(23)

4/

9-5/

5 6/

10-7

/14

10/1

-10/

30

(27)

(3

5)

(30)

5/17

-6/1

5 8/

26-9

/29

(30)

(35)

4/8-

4/19

(12)

19

2

14

Kat

su K

AT

O

Dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t dri

ll (

2)

1/11

-2/9

3/

14-4

/12

(30)

(30)

6/19

-7/1

8 9/

19-1

0/18

(3

0)

(30)

5/

22-6

/1

8/28

-9/2

1 (1

1)(2

2)6/

16-6

/26

8/11

-8/2

2 (1

1)(1

2)

31

7

A-7

2/4-

3/2

(27)

12

/9-1

2/24

3/

19-4

/12

(16)

(25)

10/2

0-11

/7

1/7-

1/30

3/

30-4

/28

(19)

(24)

(30)

15

Mik

i KO

DA

MA

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

12/1

-12/

23

(23)

4/1-

4/15

5/

28-7

/11

9/30

-10/

28

(15)

(4

5)

(29)

4/7-

5/11

8/

26-9

/27

3/23

-4/1

2

(35)

(33)

(21)

6/14

-6/2

6 10

/13-

11/1

5

(10)

(35)

4/5-

5/4

(30)

27

6

16

Azu

sa M

AT

SU

I C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t 11

/28-

12/2

3 (2

6)

10/1

5-11

/6

(23)

6/

16-6

/27

(12)

4/7-

4/18

(1

2)

73

17

Azu

sa O

KU

NO

C

oord

inat

or/S

uppo

rt o

f th

e E

xper

t in

CB

DR

M

11/2

4-12

/23

(30)

4/

2-5/

16

(45)

75

18

Yok

o O

TA

C

oord

inat

or/S

uppo

rt o

f th

e E

xper

t in

CB

DR

M

6/26

-7/1

8 9/

19-1

1/6

2/6-

3/2

(23)

(4

9)

(25)

5/13

-6/6

8/

25-9

/25

3/20

-4/1

2

(25)

(32)

(24)

6/12

-6/2

7 1/

13-1

/30

(16)

(12)

3/30

-4/2

8 (3

0)

236

Tot

al

31

26

Loc

al c

ontr

act w

ith

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Res

pons

ibil

ity

in th

e P

roje

ct

Dur

atio

n

1 M

r. A

ndre

Jay

a L

ocal

Con

sult

ant (

Out

put 1

) Ja

n.20

12-

2 M

s. M

aris

a M

ei L

ing

Loc

al C

onsu

ltan

t (O

utpu

t 2 b

efor

e)

Jan.

2012

-

3 M

r. Ta

ndio

no C

hen

Loc

al C

onsu

ltan

t (O

utpu

t 3)

Dec

.201

1-

4 M

r. M

ujib

urra

hman

L

ocal

Con

sult

ant (

Out

put 4

) A

pr.2

012-

5 M

r. B

enha

rd A

ldri

n E

mor

P

roje

ct A

ssis

tant

M

ay.2

012-

Mar

201

4

6 M

s. L

ydia

Ret

or

Sec

reta

ry

Oct

.201

2- M

ar.2

014

7 M

r. F

rank

y R

. Naj

oan

Tra

nsla

tor/

Inte

rpre

ter

May

201

3-

8 M

s. A

rlis

tha

Ban

tika

T

rans

lato

r/In

terp

rete

r

Sep

.201

2- M

ar. 2

014

9 M

s. S

arti

ny T

e’da

ng

Tra

nsla

tor

Mar

.201

3- M

ar.2

014

10

Mr.

Yoh

akim

B S

ampo

nu

GIS

Ope

rato

r N

ov.2

012-

11

Mr.

Rac

hmat

S. D

iem

yati

G

IS O

pera

tor

Feb

.201

3-M

ar.2

014

12

Mr.

Rol

ly

Dri

ver

Sep

.201

2- M

ar 2

014

13

Mr.

Alf

ons

Dri

ver

May

2013

- M

ar 2

014

14

Ms.

Wen

ny T

rish

anty

S

ecre

tary

Ja

n.20

12-O

ct.2

012

15

Ms.

Nov

iyan

ti E

rfie

n K

apar

ang

Loc

al C

onsu

ltan

t (O

utpu

t 3)

Jue.

2014

– N

ov.2

014

16

Ms.

Fin

a F

itri

any

S

ecre

tary

A

pr.2

014-

Dec

.201

4

17

Mr.

Oyo

ng S

afru

ly

Sec

reta

ry

Apr

.201

4-

18

Ms.

Viv

in N

ila

Rak

hmat

ulla

h

Tra

nsla

tor/

Inte

rpre

ter

Jun.

201

4-

A-8

Ap

pen

dix

6:

Pro

visi

on o

f E

qu

ipm

ent

As

of A

pril

201

5 1)

Pro

visi

on o

f E

quip

men

t N

o E

quip

men

t S

peci

fica

tion

and

Man

ufac

ture

r Q

uant

ity

Tot

al P

rice

D

eliv

ery

Dat

e P

lace

of

Use

C

urre

nt S

tatu

s

1 P

rint

er

Can

on L

BP

910

0 C

1

IDR

20,

500,

000

2011

/12/

14

BN

PB

H

ande

d O

ver

on 2

8 M

ar 2

014

2 C

ompu

ter

for

Haz

ard

Map

D

ell 2

320

2 ID

R 3

3,00

0,00

0 20

11/1

2/14

B

NP

B

Han

ded

Ove

r on

28

Mar

201

4

3 G

IS S

oftw

are

A

rcV

iew

10.1

1

US

D 5

,090

20

12/3

/26

BN

PB

, BP

BD

H

ande

d O

ver

on 2

8 M

ar 2

014

4 C

ompu

ter

for

Haz

ard

Map

H

P O

MN

I 22

0-10

10D

AIO

PC

2

IDR

13,

546,

000

IDR

13,

140,

000

2012

/10/

1 20

12/1

2/6

BP

BD

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi

Han

ded

Ove

r on

28

Mar

201

4

5 P

rint

er

Can

on L

BP

910

0 C

1

IDR

21,

654,

000

20

12/1

0/2

BP

BD

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi

Han

ded

Ove

r on

28

Mar

201

4

6 S

ateｌ

lite

Im

age

A

LO

S(A

VN

IR2)

1

JPY

63,

000

2012

/10/

16

BP

BD

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi

Han

ded

Ove

r on

28

Mar

201

4

7 E

leva

tion

Dat

a

IFS

AR

1

US

D 2

3,91

8.4

2012

/10/

29

BP

BD

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi

Han

ded

Ove

r on

28

Mar

201

4

8 G

IS S

oftw

are

A

rcV

iew

10.1

, Spa

tial

Ana

lyst

2

US

D 9

676.

6 20

12/1

2/3

BP

BD

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi

Han

ded

Ove

r on

28

Mar

201

4

9 S

atel

lite

Im

age

A

LO

S(A

VN

IR2)

1

JPY

825

,750

20

13/1

/7

BP

BD

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi

Han

ded

Ove

r on

28

Mar

201

4

10

Plo

tter

H

P D

esig

n Je

t 790

A4

in P

ostS

crip

t e p

rint

er (

A0

+ )

1

IDR

52,

650,

000

2013

/4/3

0 B

PB

D N

orth

Sul

awes

i H

ande

d O

ver

on 2

8 M

ar 2

014

11

Com

pute

r fo

r H

azar

d M

ap

AS

US

Eee

Top

443

0s A

LL

IN

ON

E

2 ID

R 3

3,02

8,00

0 20

14/6

/10

BP

BD

Wes

t Nus

a T

engg

ara

In u

se

12

Pri

nter

H

P L

AS

ER

JET

CP

522

5 1

IDR

22,0

00,0

00

2014

/5/1

4 B

PB

D W

est N

usa

Ten

ggar

a In

use

13

Ele

vati

on D

ata

IF

SA

R

1 U

SD

729

7.3

2014

/8/1

1 B

PB

D W

est N

usa

Ten

ggar

a In

use

14

Ele

vati

on D

ata

IF

SA

R

1 U

SD

12,

574.

4 20

14/8

/11

BP

BD

Wes

t Nus

a T

engg

ara

In u

se

15

Ele

vati

on D

ata

IF

SA

R

1 U

SD

7,9

56.4

20

14/8

/18

BP

BD

Wes

t Nus

a T

engg

ara

In u

se

16

Plo

tter

H

P D

esig

n Je

t 790

A4

in P

ostS

crip

t e p

rint

er (

A0

+ )

1

IDR

49,0

00,0

00

2014

/4/2

2 B

PB

D W

est N

usa

Ten

ggar

a In

use

2) E

quip

men

t Acc

ompa

nied

by

Exp

ert D

ispa

tch

No

Equ

ipm

ent

Spe

cifi

cati

on a

nd M

anuf

actu

rer

Qua

ntit

yT

otal

Pri

ce

Del

iver

y D

ate

Pla

ce o

f U

se

Com

men

t

N

one

A-9

Ap

pen

dix

7: C

oun

terp

art

Tra

inin

g A

s of

Apr

il 2

015

Per

iod

Nam

e O

rgan

izat

ion

Vis

ited

Ins

titu

tion

s an

d C

ours

e

25 A

ug –

8

Sep

2

012

1 D

r. Te

ddy

Sud

inda

B

NP

B

1.M

inis

try

of L

and,

Inf

rast

ruct

ure,

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

and

Tour

ism

Toh

oku

Reg

iona

l Dev

elop

men

t Bur

eau,

S

enda

i Riv

er a

nd N

atio

nal H

ighw

ay

Off

ice

2.S

hich

igah

ama

Tow

n,

3.Is

hino

mak

i Cit

y,

4. O

naga

wa

Tow

n 5.

Jap

an M

eteo

rogi

cal A

genc

y 6.

Tok

yo R

inka

i Dis

aste

r P

reve

ntio

n P

ark

7. M

egur

o W

ard

8.

Yok

oham

a C

ity

9. S

umid

a W

ard

Gov

ernm

ent

10. C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r P

reve

ntio

n G

roup

in S

umid

a W

ard

11.K

ochi

Pre

fect

ure

Gov

ernm

ent

12. K

ochi

Mun

icip

alit

y G

over

nmen

t

2 M

r.Ana

s L

uthf

i B

NP

B

3 M

r.Hoy

ke M

akar

awun

g H

ead,

BP

BD

Pro

vinc

e of

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi

4 M

r. Ji

mm

y E

. Mok

olen

sang

B

PB

D P

rovi

nce

of N

orth

Sul

awes

i

5 M

r. F

idel

wan

Buu

lolo

B

PB

D K

ota

Man

ado

6 M

r. Je

ffry

Wow

ilin

g H

ead,

BP

BD

Kot

a B

itun

g

7 M

r. W

ille

n P

olii

Run

tuka

hu

BP

BD

Kot

a To

moh

on

8 M

s. E

nna

Mok

ogin

ta

Hea

d, B

PB

D K

ota

Kot

amob

agu

9 M

r. D

juha

rdi D

amop

olii

Hea

d, B

PB

D K

abup

aten

Bol

aang

Mon

gond

ow

10

Mr.

H. E

riks

on T

egil

a H

ead,

BPB

D K

abup

aten

Bol

aang

Mon

gond

ow U

tara

11

Mr.

Mas

pan

Mus

Puw

a H

ead,

BP

BD

Kab

upat

en B

olaa

ng M

ongo

ndow

Sel

atan

12

Mr.

Har

iono

Sug

eha

Hea

d, B

PB

D K

abup

aten

Bol

aang

Mon

gond

ow T

imur

13

Mr.

Vec

ky K

aloh

H

ead,

BP

BD

Kab

upat

en M

inah

asa

14

Ms.

Lil

ly L

engk

ong

Hea

d, B

PB

D K

abup

aten

Min

ahas

a U

tara

15

Mr.

Han

drie

M.J

. Kom

alin

g H

ead,

BP

BD

Kab

upat

en M

inah

asa

Sel

atan

16

Mr.

Wel

ly M

unai

sech

e H

ead,

BP

BD

Kab

upat

en M

inah

asa

Teng

gara

17

Mr.

E. P

osum

ah

Hea

d, B

PB

D K

abup

aten

Kep

ulau

an S

itar

o

18

Mr.

Rei

ntje

Tam

boto

H

ead,

BPB

D K

abup

aten

Kep

ulau

an S

angi

he

19

Mr.

H. S

alom

be

Hea

d, B

PB

D K

abup

aten

Kep

ulau

an T

alau

d

16 A

ug －

3

0 A

ug

201

4

1 M

r. W

edha

Mag

ma

Ard

hi

Hea

d of

BP

BD

- N

TB

Pro

vinc

e 1.

Sak

uraj

ima

Vol

cano

Res

earc

h C

ente

r 2.

Sak

uraj

ima

Vis

itor

Cen

ter

(Vol

cano

Mus

eum

) 3.

Kag

oshi

ma

Pre

fect

ure

Gov

ernm

ent(

Vis

it to

Sab

o D

ept./

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dep

t.)

4. K

agos

him

a M

unic

ipal

ity

Gov

ernm

ent (

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Mea

sure

s in

Mun

icip

al G

over

nmen

t)

5.C

omm

unit

y -b

ased

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t gro

up in

Sak

ura

jim

a ar

ea

6. M

LIT

Kyu

shu

Reg

iona

l Dev

elop

men

t Bur

eau

of O

sum

i R

iver

and

N

atio

nal H

ighw

ay O

ffic

e 7.

Tok

yo R

inka

i Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Par

k 8.

Tok

yo M

etro

poli

tan

Gov

ernm

ent (

Em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

sys

tem

and

di

sast

er m

anag

emen

t bas

e)

9. L

ectu

re o

f To

hoku

Uni

vers

ity

“ R

ole

of r

esea

rch

inst

itut

e fo

r re

cons

truc

tion

fro

m G

reat

Eas

tern

Jap

an E

arth

quak

e”

10. L

ife

Saf

ety

Lea

rnin

g C

ente

r 11

. Jap

an M

eteo

rolo

gica

l Age

ncy

12. M

inis

try

of L

and,

Inf

rast

ruct

ure,

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

and

Tour

ism

13

. Hig

ashi

mat

sush

ima

Cit

y M

unic

ipal

ity

14

. Exc

hang

e of

the

prog

ress

of

reco

nstr

ucti

on w

ith

Ace

h C

ity

in

Hig

ashi

mat

sush

ima

15. N

obir

u R

eloc

ated

Dev

elop

ed L

and,

Rel

ocat

ed h

ousi

ng c

ompl

ex,

Meg

a S

olar

Par

k, D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent S

tock

pile

16

. Ish

inom

aki C

ity

for

stor

y te

llin

g of

Gre

at E

ast J

apan

Ear

thqu

ake

17. I

shin

omak

i NE

WS

ee

18. P

arti

cipa

tory

rec

onst

ruct

ion

plan

ning

in I

shin

omak

i Cit

y 19

. Obs

erva

tion

of

Em

erge

ncy

dril

l (G

inza

)

2 M

r. H

ardy

Wij

aya

Hea

d of

Pre

vent

ion

and

Pre

pare

dnes

s D

ivis

ion

– B

PB

D N

TB

Pro

vinc

e

3 M

r. A

hyar

Jun

aidi

Abd

ul A

zis

Hea

d of

Reh

abil

itat

ion

and

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

Div

isio

n -

BP

BD

NT

B P

rovi

nce

4 M

r. S

upar

di

Hea

d of

BP

BD

- K

ota

Mat

aram

5 M

r. H

alaw

i Mus

tafa

Kho

lidi

H

ead

of B

PB

D -

Kab

. Lom

bok

Bar

at

6 N

urpu

ri S

inar

ep R

uman

gin

Hea

d of

BP

BD

- K

ab. L

ombo

k Te

ngah

7 M

r. A

bdul

Hak

im

Hea

d of

BP

BD

- K

ab. L

ombo

k T

imur

8 M

r. M

oh. I

wan

Mar

et A

smar

a H

ead

of B

PB

D -

Kab

. Lom

bok

Uta

ra

9 M

r. T

holi

b A

bdul

lah

Hea

d of

BP

BD

- K

ab. S

umba

wa

Bar

at

10

Mr.

Muk

min

H

ead

of B

PB

D -

Kab

. Sum

baw

a

11

Mr.

Imra

n H

ead

of B

PB

D -

Kab

. Dom

pu

12

Mr.

Muh

amm

ad F

akhr

unra

ji B

in H

amid

H

ead

of B

PB

D -

Kot

a B

ima

13

Mr.

Abd

ul W

ahab

H

ead

of B

PB

D -

Kab

. Bim

a

14

Mr.

Nol

dy W

olte

r D

avid

Lio

w

Hea

d of

BP

BD

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi P

rovi

nce

15

Mr.

Jeff

ry W

owil

ing

Hea

d of

BP

BD

Kot

a B

itun

g

16

Ms.

Eli

n L

inaw

aty

BN

PB

17

Mr.

Yul

iant

o S

ukat

mo

Wiy

ono

BN

PB

18

Mr.

Pra

tom

o C

ahyo

Nug

roho

B

NP

B

19

Ms.

Git

a Y

ulia

nti S

uwan

di

BN

PB

20

Ms.

Dia

n A

ndry

Pus

pita

Sar

i B

NP

B

A-10

Ap

pen

dix

8: A

ssig

nm

ent

of C

oun

terp

art

Per

son

nel

A

s of

Apr

il 2

015

1) C

/P f

rom

BN

PB

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BN

PB

P

erio

d 1

Pro

ject

Dir

ecto

r M

r. B

erna

rdus

Wis

nu W

ijay

a D

eput

y C

hief

for

Pre

vent

ion

and

Pre

pare

dnes

s

Oct

201

4 -

2 M

r. D

ody

Rus

wan

di

Dep

uty

Chi

ef f

or P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

A

ug 2

013

– O

ct 2

014

3 M

r. S

ugen

g T

riut

omo

Dep

uty

Chi

ef f

or P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

-

Aug

201

3

4 P

roje

ct M

anag

er 1

for

Out

put 2

and

3-1

M

r. L

ilik

Kur

niaw

an, S

.T.,

M.S

i. D

irec

tor

for

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Red

ucti

on

M

ar 2

013

-

5 Te

ddy

W. S

udin

da

Dir

ecto

r fo

r D

isas

ter

Ris

k R

educ

tion

- M

ar 2

013

6 P

roje

ct M

anag

er 2

for

Out

put 3

-2 a

nd 4

-1

Mr.

Med

i Her

liya

nto,

CE

S,M

M

Dir

ecto

r fo

r P

repa

redn

ess

7

Pro

ject

Man

ager

3 f

or O

utpu

t 1 a

nd 2

D

r. S

utop

o P

urw

o N

ugro

ho

Hea

d of

Dat

a, I

nfor

mat

ion

and

Pub

lic

Rel

atio

n C

ente

r

8 P

roje

ct M

anag

er 4

for

Out

put 4

-2

Ms.

Ann

y Is

giat

i D

irec

tor

for

Com

mun

ity

Em

pow

erm

ent

O

ct 2

013

- 9

Drs

. Muh

taru

ddin

, M.S

i. D

irec

tor

for

Com

mun

ity

Em

pow

erm

ent

-

Oct

201

3 10

P

roje

ct C

oord

inat

or

Mr.

R. S

ugih

arto

D

irec

tor

for

Bur

eau

of L

aws

and

Coo

pera

tion

11

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n Te

am L

eade

r fo

r O

utpu

t 1

Neu

lis

Zul

iast

ri

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: I

nfor

mat

ion

12

Mem

ber

1-1

Lin

da L

esta

ri

Staf

f

13

M

embe

r 1-

2 D

r. A

gus

Wib

owo

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: D

ata

14

O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Team

Lea

der

for

Out

put 2

L

ilik

Kur

niaw

an, S

.T.,

M.S

i. D

irec

tor

for

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Red

ucti

on

15

M

embe

r 2-

1 A

rie

Ast

uti W

ulan

dari

, S.S

i. St

aff

of D

irec

tora

te f

or D

RR

16

Mem

ber

2-2

Pra

tom

o C

ahyo

Nug

roho

, S.T

. St

aff

of D

irec

tora

te f

or D

RR

17

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n, a

nd A

ctio

n P

lan

t D

eput

y Te

am L

eade

r 1

Eli

n L

inaw

ati,

S.K

.M, M

.M.

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

isio

n: M

itig

atio

n

Jun

e 20

12 -

18

Ir

. Ana

s L

uthf

i, M

.T.

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

isio

n: M

itig

atio

n

- Ju

ne 2

012

19

Mem

ber

3-1-

1 M

ohd.

Rob

i Am

ri, S

.T.

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Dis

aste

r R

isk

Ass

essm

ent

20

M

embe

r 3-

1-2

Nov

i Kum

alas

ari,

S.A

.P

Staf

f of

Dir

ecto

rate

for

DR

R

21

C

onti

ngen

cy P

lan

and

SO

P

Dep

uty

Team

Lea

der

2 Ir

. Afr

ial R

osya

, M.A

. H

ead

of S

ub D

irec

tora

te: R

espo

nse

Pla

nnin

g

22

Mem

ber

3-2-

1 dr

. Ruc

ky N

urul

Wur

sant

y D

ewi

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Nee

ds &

Pot

enti

al R

esou

rces

23

Mem

ber

3-2-

2 F

ery

Iraw

an, S

.Kom

St

aff

of D

irec

tora

te f

or P

repa

redn

ess

24

M

embe

r 3-

2-3

Yus

Riz

al

Hea

d of

Sub

Dir

ecto

rate

: Res

cue

& E

vacu

atio

n

25

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Team

Lea

der

for

Out

put 4

-1

Edy

Pur

ba

Hea

d of

Sub

Dir

ecto

rate

: Pre

para

tion

of

Res

ourc

es

Jun

e 20

12 -

26

E

lin

Lin

awat

i, S

.K.M

, M.M

. H

ead

of S

ub D

irec

tora

te: P

repa

rati

on o

f R

esou

rces

-

Jun

e 20

12

27

Mem

ber

4-1-

1 H

arap

an A

li B

erna

dus

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Con

trol

ling

28

Mem

ber

4-1-

2 M

eili

na W

ulan

dari

, S.S

os

Staf

f of

Dir

ecto

rate

for

Pre

pare

dnes

s

29

Com

mun

ity-

base

d D

isas

ter

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t Te

am L

eade

r fo

r O

utpu

t 4-2

D

ra. E

nny

Sup

arti

ni, M

.M.

Hea

d of

Sub

Dir

ecto

rate

: Com

mun

ity’

s R

ole

30

M

embe

r 4-

2-1

Mel

issa

Apr

ilia

, S.K

.M.

Staf

f of

Dir

ecto

rate

for

Com

mun

ity

Em

pow

erm

ent

31

M

embe

r 4-

2-2

Yoh

anne

s K

rist

anto

Adi

nugr

oho

Staf

f of

Dir

ecto

rate

for

Com

mun

ity

Em

pow

erm

ent

2) C

/P f

rom

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi P

rovi

nce

BP

BD

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Pro

vinc

e Te

am D

irec

tor

Ir. N

oldy

W.D

. Lio

w

Hea

d of

BP

BD

N

ov 2

013

-

2 Ir

. Hoy

ke M

akar

awun

g H

ead

of B

PB

D

- N

ov 2

013

3 C

oord

inat

or

Jim

my

Mok

olen

sang

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion

for

Pre

vent

ion

& P

repa

redn

ess

4

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n S

ub C

oord

inat

or

John

Kap

ele

E. W

ungo

w

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n fo

r E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

5

Mem

ber

1 Jo

nath

an P

ande

giro

th

Staf

f of

Div

isio

n fo

r E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

6

Mem

ber

2 D

erry

Uns

o St

aff

of P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

Sub

-Div

isio

n

7 M

embe

r 3

Indr

i St

aff

8 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Sub

Coo

rdin

ator

M

. S. L

ahid

a H

ead

of D

ivis

ion

for

Reh

abil

itat

ion

& R

econ

stru

ctio

n

9 M

embe

r 1

Yok

tan

Sud

amar

a St

aff

of R

ehab

-Rec

on S

ub-D

ivis

ion

10

M

embe

r 2

Stev

en P

osum

ah

Staf

f of

Pre

-Dis

aste

r S

ub-D

ivis

ion

11

M

embe

r 3

Yon

gki

Staf

f

12

O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t S

ub C

oord

inat

or

Ron

ny C

.R.M

. Sam

buag

a S

ecre

tary

of

BP

BD

A-11

13

Pla

n, a

nd A

ctio

n P

lan

t M

embe

r 1

Mus

Tin

ango

n H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: P

reve

ntio

n

14

Mem

ber

2 A

rlen

e R

umon

dor

Mem

ber

of Q

uick

Res

pons

e Te

am

15

M

embe

r 3

Judd

y F.

Tom

buku

St

aff

of S

ub D

iv: E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

16

C

onti

ngen

cy P

lan

and

SO

P

Sub

Coo

rdin

ator

A

lber

t CH

. Som

bah

Hea

d of

UP

TB

(R

egio

n I)

17

Mem

ber

1 F

rank

y L

aham

endu

St

aff

18

M

embe

r 2

Jim

my

Mok

olen

sang

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion

I (P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s)

19

M

embe

r 3

Jefr

i Mat

inda

s St

aff

20

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e S

ub C

oord

inat

or

The

resi

a S

unda

h H

ead

of U

PT

B (

Reg

ion

II)

21

M

embe

r 1

Chr

isti

an L

aoto

ngan

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

22

M

embe

r 2

Jefr

y P

ande

irot

h St

aff

23

M

embe

r 3

Roy

Sen

dow

St

aff

24

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Sub

Coo

rdin

ator

V

icky

Mon

gila

la

Hea

d of

UP

TB

(R

egio

n II

I)

25

M

embe

r 1

Sel

vi L

ombo

an

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Com

mun

ity

Em

pow

erm

ent

26

Mem

ber

2 E

vie

Pal

ande

ng

Staf

f of

Sub

Div

: Com

mun

ity

Em

pow

erm

ent

27

Mem

ber

3 Jo

klin

Kum

okon

g St

aff

of S

ub D

iv: C

omm

unit

y E

mpo

wer

men

t

28

M

embe

r 4

John

Mak

araw

ung

Staf

f

3) C

/Ps

from

Kab

upat

en a

nd K

ota

BPB

D in

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi P

rovi

nce

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kot

a M

anad

o

Team

Dir

ecto

r M

axim

ilia

n Ta

tahe

de

Hea

d of

BP

BD

A

ugus

t 201

2 -

2

Boy

Nar

ay

Hea

d of

BP

BD

-A

ugus

t 201

2

Coo

rdin

ator

-

-

3 O

utpu

t 1

Dis

aste

r D

ata

and

Info

rmat

ion

Mem

ber

1 Je

ane

J. B

ango

nang

, SE

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e &

Log

isti

c

4 M

embe

r 2

Geo

rgie

Pes

ulim

a, S

T

Adm

inis

trat

ion

of E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

acti

viti

es (

JFU

)

5 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 Jo

han

The

o S

upit

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n &

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

6

Mem

ber

2 Ju

lien

Baw

ole,

A.M

d R

econ

stru

ctio

n D

evel

opm

ent P

lann

ing

(JF

U)

7

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Jeff

ri A

. Pan

ambu

nan,

MA

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Pre

vent

ion

& P

repa

redn

ess

8

Mem

ber

2 B

udhi

Rai

duan

Yas

in, S

T

Ana

lyzi

ng th

e P

ost D

isas

ter

Rel

ief

(JF

U)

9

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 3

Mua

rdi R

ahm

ola,

S.S

os

Sec

reta

ry o

f B

PB

D

10

M

embe

r 4

Fen

ce D

. Sal

inde

ho, S

E

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Rec

onst

ruct

ion

11

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Fer

dy L

adja

, SH

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: P

reve

ntio

n

12

Mem

ber

2 A

rda

Toha

Pra

yiya

di, S

H

Pre

para

tion

of

Pre

pare

dnes

s G

oods

(JF

U)

13

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

3 F

idel

wan

Buu

lolo

, ST

h H

ead

of S

ecti

on: P

repa

redn

ess

14

M

embe

r 4

Ang

elin

a Ju

ly B

ajod

o, A

.M

Adm

inis

trat

ion

of R

econ

stru

ctio

n ac

tivi

ties

(JF

U)

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kot

a To

moh

on

Team

Dir

ecto

r J.

R. K

alan

gi

Hea

d of

BP

BD

D

ec 2

013

- 2

Drs

. Edd

y T

uran

g, M

M

Hea

d of

BP

BD

D

ec 2

012

- D

ec 2

013

3 R

oyke

Roe

roe

Hea

d of

BP

BD

-

Dec

201

2 4

Coo

rdin

ator

K

orne

les

Mon

tola

lu, M

Pd

Sec

reta

ry o

f B

PB

D

5

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n M

embe

r 1

Met

si C

h. T

angk

uman

, ST

S

ub D

iv: A

dmin

istr

atio

n,

UP

T P

usda

tin

(Dat

a &

Inf

orm

atio

n C

ente

r)

6 M

embe

r 2

Nic

son

A. Y

. Paa

t St

aff

7

Out

put 2

H

azar

d an

d R

isk

Map

s M

embe

r 1

Hen

gky

W. L

enzu

n H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: P

reve

ntio

n

8

Mem

ber

2 N

erov

ian

Tur

ang

Staf

f

9 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n t

Mem

ber

1 F

rann

y M

. Tul

ung,

Spi

, MT

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e &

Log

isti

c

10

Mem

ber

2 Je

ffry

Ram

bing

, SH

St

aff

11

M

embe

r 3

Fan

do M

auka

r, A

md.

T

Staf

f

12

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 4

Yob

ert T

uran

g H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: L

ogis

tic

13

M

embe

r 5

Dar

ius

Sen

duk,

SE

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

A-12

14

Mem

ber

6 V

eny

Piy

oh, S

E

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Pre

pare

dnes

s

15

Mem

ber

7 C

itra

Afa

ndi

Staf

f

16

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 W

ille

m R

untu

kahu

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Reh

abil

itat

ion

& R

econ

stru

ctio

n

17

Mem

ber

2 A

gus

Rum

ense

r, S

.Sos

H

ead

of U

nit:

Fir

e F

ight

er

18

M

embe

r 3

Ron

ald

Gon

i, S

H

Sub

Div

: Adm

inis

trat

ion;

UP

T P

usda

lops

19

Mem

ber

4 R

icha

rd P

anga

lila

St

aff

20

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

5 Ji

ma

Kap

aran

g, S

T

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Rec

onst

ruct

ion

21

M

embe

r 6

Stel

la L

angi

tan,

S. K

omp

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Reh

abil

itat

ion

22

M

embe

r 7

Imci

lia

Pel

ealu

St

aff

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kot

a B

itun

g

Team

Dir

ecto

r A

dri S

upit

H

ead

of B

PB

D

Sep

t 201

4 -

2 Je

ffry

Wow

ilin

g H

ead

of B

PB

D

2012

- S

ept 2

014

C

oord

inat

or

- -

3

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n M

embe

r 1

Mel

any

Per

mat

a, S

E, A

k St

aff

4

Mem

ber

2 S

udis

man

Ont

honi

, SE

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n &

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

5

Out

put 2

H

azar

d an

d R

isk

Map

s M

embe

r 1

Ingr

id M

. Dam

isi

Staf

f

6 M

embe

r 2

theo

doru

s M

. R

ompa

s, S

T,

ME

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Reh

abil

itat

ion

& R

econ

stru

ctio

n

7 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 A

lfin

do M

ongk

ol, S

E, A

k H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: F

inan

ce

8

Mem

ber

2 D

rs. D

jonn

y S

alan

gka

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: E

mer

genc

y &

Log

isti

c

9

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 3

Pan

dji S

isw

ojo,

SE

St

aff

10

M

embe

r 4

Wil

son

Sah

ala,

S.S

os

Staf

f

11

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 R

obby

Tim

bule

ng

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Pre

vent

ion

12

M

embe

r 2

Muh

amm

ad D

jauh

ari,

SE

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: P

repa

redn

ess

13

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

3 P

atri

es H

. K

alan

gkah

an,

SE

, A

k H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: L

ogis

tic

14

Mem

ber

4 D

rs.

Joik

e F.

D.

Ran

sale

le,

M.A

P

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kot

a K

otam

obag

u

Team

Dir

ecto

r Im

ran

Am

on

Hea

d of

BP

BD

M

ar 2

015

- 2

M. S

aleh

Zul

hadj

i H

ead

of B

PB

D

Jan

201

3 –

Mar

201

5 3

Enn

a M

okog

inta

H

ead

of B

PB

D

- J

an 2

013

C

oord

inat

or

- -

4

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n M

embe

r 1

Ver

a D

atun

sola

ng, S

H

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Law

& H

uman

Res

ourc

es

5

Mem

ber

2 Ju

lian

ti P

onto

h, S

E

Staf

6 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 S

urya

Dha

rma,

SE

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n

7 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 R

ukia

Has

an, S

E

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e

8 M

embe

r 2

Lil

i Tun

gkag

i St

af

9

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 3

Eli

s L

ism

ayan

i, S

TP

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e

10

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

Exe

rcis

eM

embe

r 1

Abd

ul M

uis

Mok

odon

gan

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Com

mun

ity

Em

pow

erm

ent

11

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

3 Ir

. I W

ayan

Dar

ma

Sec

reta

ry o

f B

PB

D

12

Mem

ber

4 F

arid

a B

ante

n, S

P

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Bol

aang

M

ongo

ndow

Team

Dir

ecto

r C

hann

y W

ayon

g H

ead

of B

PB

D

Oct

201

4 -

2 Ir

. Dad

ang

G. N

ugra

ha

Hea

d of

BP

BD

Ju

ly 2

013

– O

ct 2

014

3 D

juha

rdi D

amop

olii

H

ead

of B

PB

D

- Ju

ly 2

013

A-13

C

oord

inat

or

- -

4

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n M

embe

r 1

Fer

dina

n P

asam

buna

, ST

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Reh

abil

itat

ion

& R

econ

stru

ctio

n

5 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 H

j. D

iana

Wah

ab, S

H

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s

6 M

embe

r 2

Har

iadi

Kia

y M

asta

ri, S

T

Staf

f of

Reh

abil

itat

ion

& R

econ

stru

ctio

n

7 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 D

evie

Mok

ogin

ta, S

E

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Pla

nnin

g &

Fin

ance

8 M

embe

r 2

Rat

naw

ati H

ayat

St

aff

of F

inan

ce

9

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 3

Did

i Ari

sona

Pas

ambu

na

Staf

f of

Reh

abil

itat

ion

& R

econ

stru

ctio

n

10

Mem

ber

4 F

itri

L. A

mud

a St

aff

of P

repa

redn

ess

11

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Mut

iara

End

ang

S. T

amm

u H

ead

of S

ecti

on: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n

12

Mem

ber

2 R

afik

And

hika

Ala

mri

, SE

St

aff

of E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

13

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

3 K

ahar

uddi

n M

usta

fa, S

.Sos

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: C

omm

unit

y E

mpo

wer

men

t

14

Mem

ber

4 M

oh. A

li I

rwan

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: P

redi

sast

er

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Bol

aang

M

ongo

ndow

U

tara

Team

Dir

ecto

r R

ober

t A. B

onde

H

ead

of B

PB

D

July

201

3 -

2 H

. Eri

ckso

n Te

gila

H

ead

of B

PB

D

- Ju

ly 2

013

C

oord

inat

or

- -

3

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n M

embe

r 1

Ham

zah

Has

an, S

E

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: P

repa

redn

ess

4

Out

put 2

H

azar

d an

d R

isk

Map

s M

embe

r 1

Fit

ri R

ezek

i Las

abud

a, S

E

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Pre

dis

aste

r

5 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 S

arw

an H

asan

Abi

din,

SE

H

ead

of S

ub D

ivis

ion:

Pla

nnin

g &

Fin

ance

6 C

onti

ngen

cy P

lan

and

SO

P

Mem

ber

3 H

endr

ikus

J. P

. Las

ut

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

7

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 H

amdj

at P

aput

unga

n, S

.Pd

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n &

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

8

Mem

ber

2 B

udhi

yaw

an T

haw

ila,

A.M

d St

aff

9

Com

mun

ity-

base

d D

isas

ter

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t M

embe

r 4

Mas

itha

Hum

okor

, SE

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: C

omm

unit

y E

mpo

wer

men

t

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Bol

aang

M

ongo

ndow

S

elat

an

Team

Dir

ecto

r Y

amin

Ism

ael

Hea

d of

BP

BD

Ju

ly 2

014

-

2 M

aspa

n M

us P

uwa

Hea

d of

BP

BD

-

July

201

4

Coo

rdin

ator

-

-

3 O

utpu

t 1

Dis

aste

r D

ata

and

Info

rmat

ion

Mem

ber

1 S

arin

a P

aput

unga

n, S

E

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

4

Out

put 2

H

azar

d an

d R

isk

Map

s M

embe

r 1

Sya

rifu

din

Sut

erto

, S.S

os

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: P

repa

redn

ess

5

Mem

ber

2 S

iti N

urai

n D

aud,

ST

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: R

econ

stru

ctio

n

6 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 D

rs. T

ham

rin

Moh

. Dau

n H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Reh

abil

itat

ion

& R

econ

stru

ctio

n

7 C

onti

ngen

cy P

lan

and

SO

P

Mem

ber

3 D

rs. R

olly

Lom

amay

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n

8 O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Mah

yudi

n B

inol

F

inan

ce/T

reas

ury

9 C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

3 P

adla

n B

adu

Staf

f

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Bol

aang

M

ongo

ndow

T

imur

Team

Dir

ecto

r Y

uliu

s P

elea

lu

Hea

d of

BP

BD

S

ept 2

014

-

2 A

djib

sard

jana

Has

an J

an

Hea

d of

BP

BD

M

ar 2

014

– S

ept 2

014

3 H

ario

no S

ugeh

a H

ead

of B

PB

D

- M

arch

201

4

Coo

rdin

ator

-

-

4 O

utpu

t 1

Dis

aste

r D

ata

and

Info

rmat

ion

Mem

ber

1 R

ism

an D

amop

olii

, SE

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n

5 M

embe

r 2

Hap

it S

. Kad

engk

ang

Staf

f

A-14

6 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 H

endr

i K. L

aoh,

ST,

M.S

i H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Reh

abil

itat

ion

& R

econ

stru

ctio

n

7 M

embe

r 2

Adi

tya

M. R

antu

ng,

St

aff

8 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 R

usm

in M

okoa

gow

S

ecre

tary

of

BP

BD

9 M

embe

r 2

Moh

amad

Riz

al

Staf

f

10

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 3

Ala

n M

amon

to

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

& L

ogis

tic

11

M

embe

r 4

Fir

li M

oko

Staf

f

12

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 A

gust

inus

Hey

dem

ans,

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: P

rogr

am

13

M

embe

r 2

Sul

aeha

Um

ar A

lhei

d H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Pre

vent

ion

& P

repa

redn

ess

14

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

3 S

heyl

a J.

E. T

uman

duk,

ST

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: R

econ

stru

ctio

n

15

Mem

ber

4 V

ajri

Mok

oago

w

Staf

f

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Min

ahas

a

Team

Dir

ecto

r Y

ohan

es A

. Pes

ik S

.IP

H

ead

of B

PB

D

July

201

3 -

2

Vec

ky K

aloh

H

ead

of B

PB

D

- Ju

ly 2

013

3 C

oord

inat

or

Lie

ke R

. Pon

gow

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Pre

vent

ion

& P

repa

redn

ess

4

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n M

embe

r 1

Sil

vana

Mam

angk

ey

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Log

isti

c

5 M

embe

r 2

Joik

e O

ndan

g H

ead

of S

ecti

on: P

reve

ntio

n

6 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 D

eisi

Suo

th

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Rec

onst

ruct

ion

7

Mem

ber

2 S

elvy

Man

engk

ey

Staf

f

8 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 V

icto

r Ta

mba

riki

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: P

repa

redn

ess

9

Mem

ber

2 V

ivia

ntri

e W

atuk

angk

ow

Staf

f

10

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 3

Vic

tor

Tam

bari

ki

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Pre

pare

dnes

s

11

Mem

ber

4 L

exie

Kor

engk

eng

Staf

f

12

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 A

rthu

r L

onta

an

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

isio

n: G

ener

al A

ffai

rs

13

M

embe

r 2

Rom

my

Raw

ung

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e

14

Com

mun

ity-

base

d D

isas

ter

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t M

embe

r 3

Joik

e O

ndan

g H

ead

of S

ecti

on: P

reve

ntio

n

15

Mem

ber

4 S

evry

Mar

ingk

a St

aff

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Min

ahas

a U

tara

Team

Dir

ecto

r D

r. R

osa

Hea

d of

BP

BD

Ja

nuar

y 20

13-

2 L

illy

Len

gkon

g H

ead

of B

PB

D

-Jan

uary

201

3 3

Coo

rdin

ator

P

etru

s M

acar

au

Sec

reta

ry o

f B

PB

D

4

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n M

embe

r 1

Ir. E

rwin

F. P

. Sal

angk

a -

5

Mem

ber

2 D

rs. J

erm

ias

Lai

sina

St

aff

6 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 D

udy

H. S

. Fat

ah, S

H

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s

7 M

embe

r 2

Ron

ny P

esik

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n

8 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 St

even

H. S

olan

g, S

T

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Rec

onst

ruct

ion

9

Mem

ber

2 Ju

nita

J. S

umol

ang,

SS

St

aff

10

C

onti

ngen

cy P

lan

and

SO

P

Mem

ber

3 S

ilva

na D

ebor

a L

egi,

SS

T

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e

11

Mem

ber

4 D

rs. J

erm

ias

Lai

sina

St

aff

12

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Lai

dy G

irot

h, S

E

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

& L

ogis

tic

13

M

embe

r 2

Stev

en H

. Sol

ang,

ST

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: R

econ

stru

ctio

n

14

Com

mun

ity-

base

d D

isas

ter

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t M

embe

r 3

Fra

ns S

tefi

e P

aat,

S.S

os

Com

mun

ity

Em

pow

erm

ent

15

Mem

ber

4 D

jem

i Hep

py R

otin

sulu

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: L

ogis

tic

& E

vacu

atio

n

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Min

ahas

a Te

am D

irec

tor

Han

drie

M. J

. Kom

alin

g H

ead

of B

PB

D

2

Coo

rdin

ator

N

anci

Lud

ong

Sek

reta

ris

BP

BD

A-15

3 S

elat

an

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n M

embe

r 1

Ren

dy K

ewas

St

aff

4

Mem

ber

2 A

llan

M. O

. Mat

eka

Staf

f

5 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 N

anci

Lud

ong

Sek

reta

ris

BP

BD

6 M

embe

r 2

Step

hen

Pol

uaka

n H

ead

of S

ecti

on: R

econ

stru

ctio

n

7 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 Jh

ony

M. T

amba

jong

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e &

Log

isti

c

8 M

embe

r 2

Dav

e A

. Jan

sen

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Equ

ipm

ent &

Log

isti

cs

9

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 3

Vec

ky P

elea

lu

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s

10

Mem

ber

4 E

vie

Sum

arab

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: P

reve

ntio

n

11

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 R

endy

Kew

as

Staf

f

12

Mem

ber

2 F

adli

J. W

alal

angi

St

aff

13

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

3 R

oyke

M. P

aat

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n &

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

14

Mem

ber

4 D

ave

A. J

anse

n H

ead

of S

ecti

on: E

quip

men

t & L

ogis

tics

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Min

ahas

a Te

ngga

ra

Team

Dir

ecto

r Y

opi M

okod

aser

H

ead

of B

PB

D

Nov

201

4 -

2

(Ms)

. Roh

ana

Hea

d of

BP

BD

M

ar 2

014

– N

ov 2

014

3 W

elly

Mun

aise

che

Hea

d of

BP

BD

-

Mar

ch 2

014

C

oord

inat

or

-

4

Out

put 1

D

isas

ter

Dat

a an

d In

form

atio

n M

embe

r 1

Lan

ny D

. Wak

idin

, SH

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: G

ener

al A

ffai

rs

5

Mem

ber

2 B

arth

olom

eus.

K. T

oiyo

, SE

St

aff

in P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s

6 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 S

antj

e M

. Kum

esan

, SH

S

ecre

tary

of

BP

BD

7 M

embe

r 2

Ven

tje

F. D

. Rog

ahan

g H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e &

Log

isti

c

8 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 W

elly

Mon

onim

bar,

SH

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Fir

e F

ight

ing

9

Mem

ber

2 F

ebbi

anto

Abd

ul, S

H

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Pre

pare

dnes

s

10

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 3

Fer

ah L

umbu

F

inan

ce/T

reas

ury

11

M

embe

r 4

Mei

lani

Dal

so, S

E

Staf

f of

Fin

ance

12

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 E

rik

Man

aroi

nson

g H

ead

of S

ecti

on: P

reve

ntio

n

13

Mem

ber

2 M

eije

r W

. Mon

tol

Staf

f

14

Com

mun

ity-

base

d D

isas

ter

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t M

embe

r 3

Hen

drik

Mon

areh

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: L

ogis

tic

15

Mem

ber

4 Je

nive

r D

onny

Kad

ing

Staf

f

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Kep

ulau

an

Sit

aro

Team

Dir

ecto

r B

ob W

uate

n H

ead

of B

PB

D (

Feb

201

4)

Feb

201

4 -

2 H

erry

Lan

o A

ctin

g H

ead

of B

PB

D

Jun

2013

– F

eb 2

014

3 E

lies

er P

osum

ah

Hea

d of

BP

BD

-

June

201

3

Coo

rdin

ator

-

4 O

utpu

t 1

Dis

aste

r D

ata

and

Info

rmat

ion

Mem

ber

1 W

ense

slau

s P.

Rum

baja

n St

aff

5

Mem

ber

2 D

eysi

N. H

arm

anse

s St

aff

6 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 R

ino

Igna

tius

Kal

alo,

ST

St

aff

7

Mem

ber

2 Y

oula

V. M

. Sen

gkey

, SE

St

aff

8

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Jihm

y Ta

taun

g, S

T. M

T

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Pre

disa

ster

9 M

embe

r 2

Yen

i Fri

tsti

yant

i, S

. Sos

St

aff

10

C

onti

ngen

cy P

lan

and

SO

P

Mem

ber

3 Ja

ck N

alen

g, S

IP

Sec

reta

ry o

f B

PB

D

11

M

embe

r 4

Muh

amm

ad F

. N. V

an G

obel

St

aff

12

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Rus

li F

. Baw

oton

g, S

H

Staf

f

13

Mem

ber

2 M

aria

ny W

inny

Mas

ala

Staf

f

14

Com

mun

ity-

base

d D

isas

ter

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t M

embe

r 3

Her

ians

Kau

mbu

r, S

P

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n &

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

15

Mem

ber

4 W

ulla

n M

arga

ret,

ST

St

aff

A-16

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Kep

ulau

an

San

gihe

Team

Dir

ecto

r R

eint

je B

. Tam

boto

H

ead

of B

PB

D

Coo

rdin

ator

-

2 O

utpu

t 1

Dis

aste

r D

ata

and

Info

rmat

ion

Mem

ber

1 M

arth

ini K

aset

i St

aff

of S

ecre

tari

at

3

Mem

ber

2 F

atri

ni E

lina

Ake

de

Staf

f of

Div

isio

n: P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s

4 M

embe

r 3

F. P

. Tem

pom

ona

Staf

f of

Div

isio

n: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n &

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

5 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 M

achs

Tak

asih

aeng

H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: P

reve

ntio

n

6 M

embe

r 2

Janu

ar E

. Kak

asih

St

aff

of D

ivis

ion:

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e

7 M

embe

r 3

M. B

. Gag

hana

H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e

8 M

embe

r 4

Indo

Suk

maw

ati

Staf

f of

Div

isio

n: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n &

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

9

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

V. D

J. K

ekun

g H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Pre

vent

ion

& P

repa

redn

ess

19

M

embe

r 2

Mac

hs T

akas

ihae

ng

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Pre

vent

ion

11

M

embe

r 3

All

and

S. L

ahin

da

Staf

f of

Sec

reta

riat

12

Con

ting

ency

Pla

n an

d S

OP

M

embe

r 4

V. D

J. K

ekun

g H

ead

of D

ivis

ion:

Pre

vent

ion

& P

repa

redn

ess

13

M

embe

r 5

R. N

. W. S

embi

hing

an

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Hum

an R

esou

rces

14

Mem

ber

6 S

am Y

. Lon

do

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

& L

ogis

tic

15

M

embe

r 7

D. Z

. Tum

bal

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Pre

pare

dnes

s

16

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 D

. Z. T

umba

l H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: P

repa

redn

ess

17

M

embe

r 2

Janu

ar E

. Kak

asih

St

aff

of D

ivis

ion:

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e

18

Mem

ber

3 F.

Ron

gkon

usa

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Pro

gram

19

Com

mun

ity-

base

d D

isas

ter

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t M

embe

r 4

D. Z

. Tum

bal

Hea

d of

Sub

Div

: Pre

pare

dnes

s

20

Mem

ber

5 M

arth

ini K

aset

i St

aff

of S

ecre

tari

at

21

M

embe

r 6

M. B

imba

naun

g H

ead

of S

ub D

iv: L

ogis

tic

22

Mem

ber

7 V

. DJ.

Kek

ung

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

P

erio

d 1

Kab

upat

en

Kep

ulau

an

Tala

ud

Team

Dir

ecto

r H

abel

Sal

ombe

H

ead

of B

PB

D

Coo

rdin

ator

-

2 O

utpu

t 1

Dis

aste

r D

ata

and

Info

rmat

ion

Mem

ber

1 M

usaf

aif

Kas

ili

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Pre

vent

ion

& P

repa

redn

ess

3

Mem

ber

2 H

aric

e A

siga

St

aff

of S

ecre

tari

at

4 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 A

brah

am K

obi

Staf

f of

Sec

tion

: Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e &

Log

isti

c

5 M

embe

r 2

Jony

Lin

gkas

St

aff

of S

ecti

on: P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s

6 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 P

atni

Tah

ulen

di

Staf

f of

Sec

reta

riat

7 M

embe

r 2

Arn

i Anu

mpi

tan

Staf

f of

Sec

tion

: Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e &

Log

isti

c

8 C

onti

ngen

cy P

lan

and

SO

P

Mem

ber

3 B

less

y S

iby

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e &

Log

isti

c

9 M

embe

r 4

Mat

rina

i Lap

asi

Staf

f of

Sec

tion

: Pre

vent

ion

& P

repa

redn

ess

10

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Juli

andr

i Win

owod

a St

aff

of S

ecti

on: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n &

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

11

M

embe

r 2

Jola

nda

Gal

a St

aff

of S

ecre

tari

at

12

C

omm

unit

y-ba

sed

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

3 S

emue

l May

usip

S

ecre

tary

of

BP

BD

13

Mem

ber

4 D

elfi

st T

aari

wua

n St

aff

of S

ecre

tari

at

4) C

/Ps

from

Kab

upat

en a

nd K

ota

BPB

D in

Wes

t Nus

a T

engg

ara

Pro

vinc

e

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1 P

rovi

nce

Team

Dir

ecto

r Ir

. Wed

ha M

agm

a A

rdhi

, MT

P

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(A

ug 2

013

– no

w)

Coo

rdin

ator

2

Out

put 2

D

isas

ter

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

appi

ng

Mem

ber

1 Ir

. L. H

adi W

ijay

a, M

.Si

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n fo

r P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s K

enji

MO

RIT

A

3 M

embe

r 2

Ir. H

. Ahy

ar J

unai

di, M

T

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n: R

ehab

ilit

atio

n an

d R

econ

stru

ctio

n

Sug

io I

mam

ura

4 M

embe

r 3

Ibra

him

Kur

niaw

an, S

E

Staf

f of

Pro

gram

Sub

-Div

isio

n A

kihi

ro F

UR

UTA

A-17

5 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t P

lan

and

Act

ion

Pla

n M

embe

r 1

Ari

fudd

in, S

T

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n fo

r E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

and

Log

isti

c

Ryo

ji T

AK

AH

AS

HI

6 M

embe

r 2

Mus

taki

m, S

T, M

T

Staf

f of

Pro

gram

Sub

-Div

isio

n

Kat

su K

AT

O

7 M

embe

r 3

Rid

ho A

hyan

a, S

IP

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

for

Pre

pare

dnes

s

8

Mem

ber

4 A

gung

Pra

muj

a, S

.Adm

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

9

Out

put 4

C

omm

unit

y B

ased

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Man

agem

ent

Mem

ber

1 Ir

. L. H

adi W

ijay

a, M

.Si

Hea

d of

Div

isio

n fo

r P

reve

ntio

n &

Pre

pare

dnes

s M

iki K

OD

AM

A

10

Mem

ber

2 R

idho

Ahy

ana,

SIP

H

ead

of S

ecti

on f

or P

repa

redn

ess

Y

oko

OTA

11

M

embe

r 3

H. D

arw

is, S

.Sos

H

ead

of S

ecti

on: P

reve

ntio

n

12

Mem

ber

4 Is

band

ono,

SK

M

Hea

d of

Sec

tion

: Reh

abil

itat

ion

5) C

/Ps

from

Kab

upat

en a

nd K

ota

BPB

D in

Wes

t Nus

a T

engg

ara

Pro

vinc

e

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kot

a M

atar

am

Team

Dir

ecto

r S

upar

di, M

T

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ju

ni 2

014

– no

w)

2

Coo

rdin

ator

Ir

. H. S

afru

din

Ali

S

ecre

tary

of

BP

BD

3 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 Ir

. Hus

nil I

mam

San

usi

Hea

d of

Reh

abil

itat

ion

& R

econ

stru

ctio

n D

ivis

ion

Ken

ji M

OR

ITA

4

Mem

ber

2 D

rs. L

alu

Asm

awa

Hea

d of

Pla

nnin

g S

ub-D

ivis

ion

Sug

io I

mam

ura

5 M

embe

r 3

Ant

onio

Ren

dra

S.

Staf

f A

kihi

ro F

UR

UTA

6

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Drs

. Zae

nudi

n H

ead

of R

ehab

ilit

atio

n &

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

Div

isio

n R

yoji

TA

KA

HA

SH

I 7

Mem

ber

2 H

. Nas

rudi

n, S

P., S

.Sos

., M

M

Hea

d of

Pre

pare

dnes

s S

ecti

on

Kat

su K

AT

O

8 O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Sup

arm

an, S

H

Hea

d of

Em

erge

ncy

and

Log

isti

c S

ecti

on

Mik

i KO

DA

MA

9

Mem

ber

2 S

udio

no, S

IP

Hea

d of

Pre

vent

ion

Sec

tion

Y

oko

OTA

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kab

upat

en

Lom

bok

Uta

ra

Team

Dir

ecto

r R

aden

Tre

snaw

ati,

S.S

os

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ja

nuar

y 20

15 –

now

)

2 M

oh. I

wan

Mar

et A

smar

a H

ead

of B

PB

D (

Feb

ruar

i 201

2 –

Janu

ary

2015

)

3 C

oord

inat

or

Aki

Tre

sna

Bha

kti,

S.P

d S

ecre

tary

of

BP

BD

4 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 S

aifu

l Bah

ri

Staf

f K

enji

MO

RIT

A

5 M

embe

r 2

Ahm

ad Z

aenu

din

Staf

f S

ugio

Im

amur

a 6

Mem

ber

3 D

arsi

dep

Ban

yu A

ji

Staf

f A

kihi

ro F

UR

UTA

7

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Wiw

in F

atri

ya N

ings

ih

Staf

f of

Sec

reta

riat

R

yoji

TA

KA

HA

SH

I 8

Mem

ber

2 B

asuk

i Cat

ur T

ejo

U.

Staf

f of

Sec

reta

riat

K

atsu

KA

TO

9

Mem

ber

3 M

. Sa’

i, P

d.i

Mem

ber

of Q

uick

Res

pons

e Te

am

10

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Asd

iant

o St

aff

Mik

i KO

DA

MA

11

M

embe

r 2

Ham

rull

ah

Staf

f Y

oko

OTA

12

M

embe

r 3

Mun

ir

Staf

f

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kab

upat

en

Lom

bok

Bar

at

Team

Dir

ecto

r D

rs. H

. Muh

naji

b, M

M

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ja

nuar

y 20

15 –

now

)

2

Drs

. Hal

awi M

usta

fa K

holi

di

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ja

nuar

y 20

14 –

Jan

uary

201

5)

3

Coo

rdin

ator

D

ewa

Ket

ut A

rdan

a, S

H, M

H

Sec

reta

ry o

f B

PB

D

4

Out

put 2

H

azar

d an

d R

isk

Map

s M

embe

r 1

Moh

. Ily

as, S

H

Hea

d of

Pre

vent

ion

and

Pre

pare

dnes

s D

ivis

ion

Ken

ji M

OR

ITA

5

Mem

ber

2 Ir

. H. A

bdul

Azi

s H

ead

of R

econ

stru

ctio

n S

ecti

on

Sug

io I

mam

ura

6 M

embe

r 3

Anw

ar S

adar

, ST

St

aff

of E

mer

genc

y an

d L

ogis

tic

Div

isio

n A

kihi

ro F

UR

UTA

7

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Drs

. H. A

bdul

lah,

MM

H

ead

of P

reve

ntio

n S

ecti

on

Ryo

ji T

AK

AH

AS

HI

8 M

embe

r 2

Imro

n R

osid

in, S

E

Hea

d of

Pla

nnin

g an

d P

rogr

am S

ub-D

ivis

ion

Kat

su K

AT

O

9 M

embe

r 3

Nan

da K

urni

awan

, ST

St

aff

of P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

Div

isio

n

10

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 D

rs. H

. Abd

ulla

h, M

M

Staf

f

Mik

i KO

DA

MA

11

M

embe

r 2

Tohr

i, S

.IP

H

ead

of P

repa

redn

ess

Div

isio

n Y

oko

OTA

12

M

embe

r 3

Sla

met

Kar

yadi

, A.M

d St

aff

of P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

Div

isio

n

13

Mem

ber

4 A

mri

llah

St

aff

of P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

Div

isio

n

A-18

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kab

upat

en

Lom

bok

Teng

ah

Team

Dir

ecto

r L

alu

Nur

puri

, S.I

P

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ja

nuar

i 201

3 –

now

)

2 C

oord

inat

or

Sah

abud

in, S

H

Sec

reta

ry o

f B

PB

D

3

Out

put 2

H

azar

d an

d R

isk

Map

s M

embe

r 1

Suh

arto

, SH

H

ead

of E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

Sub

-Div

isio

n K

enji

MO

RIT

A

4 M

embe

r 2

Ari

da N

uriz

an, S

T

Staf

f S

ugio

Im

amur

a 5

Mem

ber

3 L

alu

Erw

in R

ahm

an, S

T

Staf

f A

kihi

ro F

UR

UTA

6

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Mar

is, S

.Sos

H

ead

of P

repa

redn

ess

Sub

-Div

isio

n R

yoji

TA

KA

HA

SH

I 7

Mem

ber

2 L

alu

Mun

ardi

, S.K

om, M

M

Staf

f K

atsu

KA

TO

8

Mem

ber

3 H

alik

, S.S

os

Staf

f

9 O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Eru

Jun

iant

o, S

.Sos

H

ead

of P

reve

ntio

n S

ub-D

ivis

ion

Mik

i KO

DA

MA

10

M

embe

r 2

Mus

tafa

Kam

al J

auha

ri, S

.Sos

St

aff

Yok

o O

TA

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kab

upat

en

Lom

bok

Tim

ur

Team

Dir

ecto

r D

rs. H

. Nap

si, M

M.

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ja

nuar

y 20

15 –

now

)

2 Ir

. H. A

bdul

Hak

im, M

M.

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ja

nuar

y 20

13 –

Jan

uary

201

5)

3

Coo

rdin

ator

H

. Kar

tini

, ST

S

ecre

tary

of

BP

BD

4 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 H

. Hid

ayat

, SH

, MH

H

ead

of P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

Div

isio

n K

enji

MO

RIT

A

5 M

embe

r 2

Nur

ul I

lham

, S.S

os

Hea

d of

Pre

pare

dnes

s S

ecti

on

Sug

io I

mam

ura

6 M

embe

r 3

Tauf

an S

apar

di

Staf

f A

kihi

ro F

UR

UTA

7

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Lal

u R

usna

n, S

.Sos

H

ead

of P

rogr

am a

nd R

epor

ting

Sub

-Div

isio

n R

yoji

TA

KA

HA

SH

I 8

Mem

ber

2 L

alu

Suh

erm

an, S

.Sos

H

ead

of E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

Sub

-Div

isio

n K

atsu

KA

TO

9

Mem

ber

3 M

uh. I

khsa

n P

lato

on C

omm

ando

r of

Fir

e F

ight

er

10

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Lal

u U

mar

dani

H

ead

of R

econ

stru

ctio

n S

ecti

on

Mik

i KO

DA

MA

11

M

embe

r 2

Yul

iadi

Her

man

to

Staf

f Y

oko

OTA

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kab

upat

en

Sum

baw

a

Team

Dir

ecto

r Ir

. Muk

min

, M.S

i H

ead

of B

PB

D (

Feb

ruar

i 201

2 –

now

)

2 C

oord

inat

or

Dra

. Hj.

Juri

ah

Sec

reta

ry o

f B

PB

D

3

Out

put 2

H

azar

d an

d R

isk

Map

s M

embe

r 1

Moh

. Gan

efi,

A.P

i H

ead

of P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

Div

isio

n K

enji

MO

RIT

A

4 M

embe

r 2

Rah

mat

H

ead

of P

repa

redn

ess

Sec

tion

S

ugio

Im

amur

a 5

Mem

ber

3 Ja

lalu

ddin

St

aff

Aki

hiro

FU

RU

TA

6 M

embe

r 4

Wah

yu I

ndra

jaya

, ST

St

aff

7

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Abd

. Rau

f, S

.Sos

H

ead

of P

rogr

am a

nd R

epor

ting

Sub

-Div

isio

n R

yoji

TA

KA

HA

SH

I 8

Mem

ber

2 S

iti A

min

ah, S

T

Hea

d of

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e S

ub-D

ivis

ion

Kat

su K

AT

O

9 M

embe

r 3

Sup

ri, S

T

Staf

f of

Sec

reta

riat

10

Mem

ber

4 N

uraw

an Z

aput

ra, S

T

Pla

toon

Com

man

dor

of F

ire

Fig

hter

11

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 D

rs. U

sman

H

ead

of R

econ

stru

ctio

n S

ecti

on

Mik

i KO

DA

MA

12

M

embe

r 2

Sya

msu

ddin

Nur

St

aff

Yok

o O

TA

13

Mem

ber

3 T

urin

o Ju

naid

i, S

.Sos

St

aff

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kab

upat

en

Sum

baw

a B

arat

Team

Dir

ecto

r D

rs. T

holi

b A

bdul

lah

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ju

li 2

013

– no

w)

2

Coo

rdin

ator

M

ukhl

is D

M

Hea

d of

Sec

reta

riat

3 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 N

ofir

zal Z

hain

syah

, SE

H

ead

of R

ehab

ilit

atio

n an

d R

econ

stru

ctio

n D

ivis

ion

Ken

ji M

OR

ITA

4

Mem

ber

2 H

asan

udin

H

ead

of G

ener

al A

ffai

r an

d St

affi

ng S

ub-D

ivis

ion

Sug

io I

mam

ura

5 M

embe

r 3

Muh

amm

ad N

aian

, ST

St

aff

of B

appe

da

Aki

hiro

FU

RU

TA

6 O

utpu

t 3

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n,

and

Act

ion

Pla

n

Mem

ber

1 Y

ulia

nur,

ST

H

ead

of R

econ

stru

ctio

n S

ecti

on

Ryo

ji T

AK

AH

AS

HI

7 M

embe

r 2

Kam

aria

h S

yam

sih

Staf

f of

Sec

reta

riat

K

atsu

KA

TO

A-19

8 M

embe

r 3

Dya

h S

apta

rini

, S.S

i H

ead

of P

lann

ing

and

Pro

gram

For

mul

atio

in S

ub-D

ivis

ion

9

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 M

uham

mad

Rif

ai

Hea

d of

Pre

pare

dnes

s S

ecti

on

Mik

i KO

DA

MA

10

M

embe

r 2

Muh

amm

ad, S

AP

H

ead

of L

ogis

tic

Sec

tion

Y

oko

OTA

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kab

upat

en

Dom

pu

Team

Dir

ecto

r D

rs. I

mra

n M

. Has

an

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ju

ni 2

013

– no

w)

2

Coo

rdin

ator

D

rs. S

upar

man

S

ecre

tary

of

BP

BD

3 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 A

hyan

syah

, S.S

os

Hea

d of

Pre

vent

ion

and

Pre

pare

dnes

s S

ecti

on

Ken

ji M

OR

ITA

4

Mem

ber

2 A

bdul

Lat

if

Staf

f S

ugio

Im

amur

a 5

Mem

ber

3 Ju

naid

in

Staf

f A

kihi

ro F

urut

a 6

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Ir. A

ghan

syah

H

ead

of R

ehab

ilit

atio

n an

d R

econ

stru

ctio

n S

ecti

on

Ryo

ji T

AK

AH

AS

HI

7 M

embe

r 2

Kah

arud

in, S

E

Staf

f K

atsu

KA

TO

8

Mem

ber

3 A

mir

uddi

n St

aff

9

Out

put 4

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

and

E

xerc

ise

Mem

ber

1 M

. Sal

eh

Staf

f M

iki K

OD

AM

A

10

Mem

ber

2 A

rifi

n, A

md

Staf

f Y

oko

OTA

11

M

embe

r 3

Isw

an

Staf

f

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kot

a B

ima

Team

Dir

ecto

r D

rs. H

. M. F

akhr

unra

ji, M

E

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(O

ktob

er 2

012

– no

w)

2

Coo

rdin

ator

D

rs. H

amda

n S

ecre

tary

of

BP

BD

3 C

oord

inat

or

H. E

fend

i Ism

ail,

SE

H

ead

of P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

Div

isio

n

4 O

utpu

t 2

Haz

ard

and

Ris

k M

aps

Mem

ber

1 Im

maw

an M

usli

min

, ST,

M.E

ng

Hea

d of

Pre

vent

ion

Sec

tion

K

enji

MO

RIT

A

5 M

embe

r 2

Ari

f R

usm

an E

fend

i, S

T, M

.Eng

H

ead

of D

ata

and

Stat

isti

c S

ub-D

ivis

ion,

Bap

peda

S

ugio

Im

amur

a 6

Mem

ber

3 A

di A

khw

an, S

T, M

.Eng

, M.S

c H

ead

of R

egio

n F

acil

ity,

Bap

peda

A

kihi

ro F

urut

a 7

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

Drs

. H. M

uhta

r Yas

in, M

AP

H

ead

of C

omm

issi

on A

, Kot

a B

ima

Par

liam

ent

Ryo

ji T

AK

AH

AS

HI

8 M

embe

r 2

Ir. T

afsi

r H

ead

of S

ocia

l and

Cul

ture

, Bap

peda

K

atsu

KA

TO

9

Mem

ber

3 A

bdur

ahm

an, S

T

Tem

p. H

ead

of R

ehab

ilit

atio

n an

d R

econ

stru

ctio

n D

ivis

ion

10

M

embe

r 4

Sur

yani

, SE

H

ead

of P

rogr

am S

ub-D

ivis

ion

11

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Hid

ayat

, Sm

Hk

Tem

p. H

ead

of L

ogis

tic

and

Em

erge

ncy

Div

isio

n M

iki K

OD

AM

A

12

Mem

ber

2 M

asri

n, S

.Pt

Hea

d of

Pre

pare

dnes

s S

ecti

on

Yok

o O

TA

Pos

itio

n in

the

Pro

ject

N

ame

Pos

itio

n in

BP

BD

Ja

pane

se C

ount

erpa

rt

1

Kab

upat

en

Bim

a

Team

Dir

ecto

r D

rs. H

. Sum

arso

no, S

H

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(Ja

nuar

y 20

15 –

now

)

2 A

bdul

Wah

ab, S

H

Hea

d of

BP

BD

(...

– J

anua

ry 2

015)

3 C

oord

inat

or

Indr

a N

urja

ya, S

H

Sec

reta

ry o

f B

PB

D

4

Out

put 2

H

azar

d an

d R

isk

Map

s M

embe

r 1

Ari

es M

unan

dar,

ST.

MT.

H

ead

of P

reve

ntio

n an

d P

repa

redn

ess

Div

isio

n K

enji

MO

RIT

A

5 M

embe

r 2

Sha

lahu

ddin

, ST

H

ead

of R

ehab

ilit

atio

n S

ecti

on

Sug

io I

mam

ura

6 M

embe

r 3

Aji

Sup

rayo

gi

Staf

f A

kihi

ro F

urut

a 7

Out

put 3

R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

an

d A

ctio

n P

lan

M

embe

r 1

A. R

ifai

, ST

H

ead

of R

ehab

ilit

atio

n an

d R

econ

stru

ctio

n D

ivis

ion

Ryo

ji T

AK

AH

AS

HI

8 M

embe

r 2

M. G

unaw

an, S

.Si

Hea

d of

Pro

gram

and

Rep

orti

ng S

ub-D

ivis

ion

Kat

su K

AT

O

9 M

embe

r 3

Rud

i Har

tono

, S.S

os

Hea

d of

em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e S

ecti

on

10

O

utpu

t 4

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll a

nd

Exe

rcis

e M

embe

r 1

Zul

kifl

i H. A

bidi

n, S

.Sos

H

ead

of P

reve

ntio

n S

ecti

on

Mik

i KO

DA

MA

11

M

embe

r 2

Dad

an K

usda

na

Hea

d of

Pre

pare

dnes

s S

ecti

on

Yok

o O

TA

A-20

Ap

pen

dix

9: O

per

atio

n B

ud

get

Japa

nese

Sid

e

(Cur

renc

y: J

PY

)

Item

s F

Y20

11

Jul 2

011

– M

ar 2

012

FY

2012

Apr

201

2 –

Mar

201

3

FY

2013

Apr

201

3 –

Mar

201

4

FY

2014

Apr

201

4 -

Mar

201

5

FY

2015

Apr

201

5 -

Pre

sent

T

otal

Ope

rati

onal

Exp

ense

s

(inc

ludi

ng ,

rem

uner

atio

n of

loca

l sta

ff, c

ar r

enta

l cos

t)

3,42

2,24

0 12

,454

,538

16

,718

,008

20,9

99,6

80N

.A53

,594

,466

Pur

chas

e of

Equ

ipm

ent

(inc

ludi

ng ,

prin

ter,

plo

tter

, com

pute

r )

869,

001

3,93

9,95

7 51

1,75

83,

044,

459

N.A

8,36

5,17

5

Cou

nter

part

Tra

inin

g

(inc

ludi

ng ,

tran

spor

tati

on c

ost,

text

boo

k, v

enue

) 0

1,11

3,77

7 0

1,22

3,96

2N

.A2,

337,

739

Tot

al

4,29

1,24

1 17

,508

,272

17

,229

,766

23,8

84,4

47

64,2

97,3

80

Indo

nesi

an S

ide

(C

urre

ncy:

ID

R)

Item

s F

Y20

11

Jul 2

011

– M

ar 2

012

FY

2012

Apr

201

2 –

Mar

201

3

FY

2013

Apr

201

3 –

Mar

201

4

FY

2014

Apr

201

4 -

Mar

201

5

FY

2015

Apr

201

5 -

Pre

sent

T

otal

Tot

al

A-21

Ap

pen

dix

10:

Res

ult

Gri

d (

Ach

ieve

men

t of

Ind

icat

ors)

N

arra

tive

Sum

mar

y V

erif

iabl

e In

dica

tors

C

urre

nt S

tatu

s A

sses

smen

t O

vera

ll G

oal

The

pro

vinc

ial B

PB

Ds

as w

ell

as th

e re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

BP

BD

s be

side

the

targ

et a

reas

ar

e es

tabl

ishe

d, a

nd th

e di

sast

er

man

agem

ent c

apac

itie

s of

them

ar

e en

hanc

ed b

y us

ing

mat

eria

ls

form

ulat

ed a

nd m

etho

dolo

gy

esta

blis

hed

in th

e pr

ojec

t.

The

num

ber

of p

rovi

nces

as

wel

l as

reg

enci

es/m

unic

ipal

itie

s th

at

appl

y th

e m

etho

dolo

gies

es

tabl

ishe

d in

the

Pro

ject

for

ac

cum

ulat

ing

disa

ster

dat

a,

crea

ting

haz

ard

and

risk

map

s,

form

ulat

ing

regi

onal

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t pla

n an

d co

nduc

ting

di

sast

er m

anag

emen

t exe

rcis

e.

・ O

utpu

t 5 (

e.g.

dis

sem

inat

ion

of th

e Te

chni

cal G

uide

line

for

for

mul

atio

n of

RD

MP

) w

as a

dded

to P

DM

to b

ridg

e th

e ga

p be

twee

n th

e P

roje

ct P

urpo

se a

nd th

e O

vera

ll G

oal.

At p

rese

nt, h

owev

er, t

he a

ppli

cati

on o

f m

etho

dolo

gies

is s

till

lim

ited

wit

hin

the

targ

et

prov

ince

s an

d re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

only

. O

ngoi

ng a

ctiv

ity

of O

utpu

t 5 (

e.g.

the

endo

rsem

ent/

appr

oval

of

the

Tech

nica

l G

uide

line

by

BN

PB

and

pos

sibl

e di

ssem

inat

ion

of th

e gu

idel

ine

in th

e di

sast

er m

anag

emen

t wee

k in

Oct

ober

201

5) w

ould

pro

mpt

th

e ad

vanc

emen

t tow

ards

the

Ove

rall

Goa

l.

・ D

isse

min

atio

n co

uld

be p

ossi

ble

if th

e Te

chni

cal G

uide

line

wou

ld b

e us

ed in

trai

ning

con

duct

ed a

t Ina

-DR

TG

.

Not

A

chie

ved

Pro

ject

Pur

pose

T

he d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent

capa

citi

es o

f B

NP

B, t

he

prov

inci

al B

PB

Ds,

and

the

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y B

PB

Ds

in

the

targ

et a

rea

are

enha

nced

.

1. N

umbe

r or

Cas

es th

a t R

egio

nal

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n (R

DM

P)

form

ulat

ed th

roug

h th

e P

roje

ct p

roce

ssed

to a

ppro

ve b

y th

e lo

cal a

utho

rity

.

・ A

ll th

e 14

Kab

/Kot

a R

DM

Ps

in S

UL

UT

wer

e ap

prov

ed b

y th

e he

ad o

f B

NP

Bs.

(A

s of

Apr

il 2

015,

nin

e R

DM

Ps

out o

f th

e 14

w

ere

also

app

rove

d by

the

may

or o

f K

ab/K

ota)

Targ

et P

rovi

nce

Num

ber

of R

DM

Ps

form

ulat

ed b

y th

e P

roje

ct

Num

ber

of R

DM

Ps

appr

oved

by

the

loca

l aut

hori

ty (

Hea

d of

BP

BD

) N

orth

Sul

awes

i Pro

vinc

e (S

UL

UT

) 14

(co

mpl

eted

)

14

Wes

t Nus

a Te

ngga

ra (

NT

B)

10 (

curr

entl

y un

der

form

ulat

ion)

- ・

10 K

ab/K

ota

RD

MP

s in

NT

B c

urre

ntly

bei

ng f

orm

ulat

ed in

the

Pro

ject

are

als

o ex

pect

ed to

be

appr

oved

upo

n th

eir

com

plet

ion.

Par

tial

ly

Ach

ieve

d (a

ctiv

itie

s in

N

TB

sti

ll

ongo

ing)

2. N

umbe

r of

vol

unta

ry d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

con

duct

ed

in th

e co

mm

unit

ies

wit

hin

the

targ

et a

rea.

・A

t lea

st 6

vol

unta

ry d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

wer

e id

enti

fied

aft

er a

ctiv

itie

s in

SU

LU

T w

as c

ompl

eted

.

Lev

el

D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent E

xerc

ise

Pro

vinc

e

1)B

PB

D S

UL

UT

org

aniz

ed a

n ev

alua

tion

dri

ll o

n 4

Oct

ober

201

3 at

gov

erno

r’s

fiel

d of

fice

, in

volv

ing

300

pers

onne

l fro

m B

PB

D M

anad

o, B

PB

D T

omoh

on, a

rmy,

pro

vinc

ial h

ealt

h of

fice

, P

MI,

and

oth

er in

stit

utio

ns.

T

he n

ext d

ay o

f th

e dr

ill,

stak

ehol

der

show

ed th

eir

reso

urce

s. E

ach

agen

cy d

emon

stra

ted

how

to

use

equi

pmen

t.

R

egen

cy a

nd

Mun

icip

alit

y

2)B

PB

D B

itun

g or

gani

zed

an e

vacu

atio

n dr

ill i

n M

ay 2

014

part

icip

ated

by

disa

ster

rel

ated

age

ncie

s in

Bit

ung

(e.g

. age

ncy

for

heal

th, s

ocia

l, an

d pu

blic

wor

ks),

and

oth

er c

omm

unit

y ba

sed

orga

niza

tion

s (e

.g. T

AG

AN

A, S

IBA

T),

and

PM

I 3)

BP

BD

Man

ado

cond

ucte

d an

eva

cuat

ion

dril

l in

Janu

ary

2015

bas

ed o

n ex

peri

ence

of

the

two

prec

edin

g C

PX

(S

ep 2

013

and

Oct

201

4)

4)B

PB

D S

itar

o al

loca

ted

IDR

20

mil

lion

(20

14)

and

IDR

40

mil

lion

(20

15)

to p

rom

ote

CB

DR

M a

t D

esa

Tata

hade

ng (

2014

), D

esa

Dom

paso

and

Des

a R

anot

ana

(201

5)

5)

BP

BD

Sit

aro

has

esta

blis

hed

“Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t For

um”

to r

evis

e th

e R

DM

P in

clud

ing

mem

bers

fro

m v

illa

ges.

6)

B

PB

D S

itar

o w

as in

volv

ed in

the

com

mun

ity

evac

uati

on d

rill

org

aniz

ed b

y th

e R

ed C

ross

loca

l of

fice

in O

ctob

er 2

014

(the

rel

atio

nshi

p be

twee

n B

PBD

Sit

aro

and

the

Red

Cro

ss lo

cal o

ffic

e ha

d be

en s

tren

gthe

ned

due

to th

e P

roje

ct)

Vil

lage

-

At K

elur

ahan

Beb

ali (

one

of th

e tw

o pi

lot v

illa

ges)

Sit

aro,

con

side

rati

on o

n re

visi

ng v

olca

no

haza

rd m

ap f

or s

etti

ng u

p si

gn b

oard

s is

ong

oing

in 2

015

Not

e) th

e nu

mbe

r is

as

man

y as

iden

tifi

ed d

urin

g th

e te

rmin

al e

valu

atio

n th

roug

h in

terv

iew

and

que

stio

nnai

re. N

ot a

ll K

ab/K

ota

wer

e su

rvey

ed.

Par

tial

ly

Ach

ieve

d (a

ctiv

itie

s in

N

TB

sti

ll

ongo

ing)

Out

puts

1.

The

cap

acit

y fo

r th

e re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

BP

BD

s to

acc

umul

ate

disa

ster

da

ta/i

nfor

mat

ion

whi

ch a

re

fund

amen

tal f

or d

isas

ter

risk

m

anag

emen

t and

impr

ove

1-

1.A

ccum

ulat

ion

of d

isas

ter

data

it

ems

(New

ly a

ccum

ulat

ed

sinc

e th

ere

are

no e

xist

ing

data

) in

the

targ

et a

rea.

(1st T

arge

t are

a of

SU

LU

T)

・

Tech

nica

l gui

delin

e fo

r co

llec

ting

and

sto

ring

dis

aste

r da

ta/i

nfor

mat

ion

(ver

1.0)

[D

raft

- S

epte

mbe

r 20

13]

was

pre

pare

d ba

sed

on

acti

viti

es in

SU

LU

T in

acc

orda

nce

wit

h th

e fo

llow

ing:

1)

Per

ka N

o. 8

/201

1 (S

tand

ardi

zatio

n of

Dis

aste

r D

ata)

2)

Per

ka N

o. 7

/201

2 (G

uide

line

on

data

man

agem

ent a

nd D

isas

ter

Info

rmat

ion)

・

The

tech

nica

l gui

deli

ne p

rovi

des

5 da

ta f

orm

ats

whi

ch w

ere

deve

lope

d by

the

Pro

ject

.

Ach

ieve

d

A-22

accu

racy

of

such

da

ta/i

nfor

mat

ion

in th

e ta

rget

ar

ea is

enh

ance

d.

Pha

se

Per

ka N

o. 8

/201

1 D

ata

For

mat

dev

elop

ed b

y th

e P

roje

ct

Pre

Dis

aste

r ・

Reg

iona

l Pro

file

For

m

and

Ava

ilab

ilit

y of

R

esou

rce

For

m

・ P

re D

isas

ter

Dat

a: A

. Kab

upat

en/K

ota

Pro

file

・

Pre

Dis

aste

r D

ata:

B. R

esou

rces

Ava

ilab

ilit

y –

Log

isti

c ・

Init

ial R

ecor

d of

Dis

aste

r In

cide

nt I

nfor

mat

ion

(dai

ly r

epor

t)

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e・

The

For

m o

f D

isas

ter

Eve

nt

・E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

Dat

a: D

isas

ter

Inci

dent

For

m

・S

urve

y in

Dis

aste

r L

ocat

ion

For

m

Pos

t Dis

aste

r ・

For

m o

f R

ehab

ilit

atio

n an

d R

econ

stru

ctio

n

-

・T

he a

ctiv

ity

for

deve

lopi

ng th

e te

chni

cal g

uide

line

was

com

plet

ed. R

evis

ion

of th

e gu

idel

ine

is n

ot in

clud

ed in

the

2nd h

alf

of th

e P

roje

ct p

erio

d.

1-2.

Impr

ovem

ent o

f di

sast

er d

ata

qual

ity

(By

foll

owin

g th

e fo

rmat

, dat

a ar

e su

ffic

ient

ly

accu

mul

ated

) in

the

targ

et a

rea.

・ T

he d

ata

form

at w

as u

sed

at a

ctua

l dis

aste

r ev

ents

in S

UL

UT

suc

h as

flo

od in

Feb

ruar

y 20

13 a

nd J

anua

ry 2

014

in M

anad

o.

BP

BD

SU

LU

T in

dica

ted

that

out

put 1

(th

e da

ta f

orm

at a

nd te

chni

cal g

uide

line

) w

ere

part

icul

arly

use

ful.

・

BN

PB

issu

e a

peri

odic

al m

agaz

ine

“GE

MA

” B

NP

B th

ree

tim

es a

yea

r. D

ata

coll

ecte

d w

ith

the

form

at c

ould

be

incl

uded

in th

e m

agaz

ine.

Ach

ieve

d

2. T

he c

apac

ity

for

crea

tion

of

Haz

ard

and

risk

map

s at

re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

leve

l in

the

targ

et a

rea

is

enha

nced

.

2-1.

Num

ber

of th

e re

genc

ies/

mun

icip

alit

ies

whe

re

haza

rd a

nd r

isk

map

s at

re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

leve

l are

cr

eate

d in

the

targ

et a

rea.

(1st T

arge

t are

a of

SU

LU

T)

・ 1

5 K

ab/K

ota

in S

UL

UT

are

fur

nish

ed w

ith

haza

rd m

aps,

whi

ch w

ere

com

plet

ed b

y 17

Dec

201

3 (5

th W

/S f

or O

utpu

t 2),

on

nine

di

sast

ers

(Flo

od, F

lash

floo

d, L

ands

lide

, Ext

rem

e W

eath

er, D

raug

ht, F

ores

t Fir

e, E

arth

quak

e, T

suna

mi,

and

Vol

cani

c E

rupt

ion)

. V

ulne

rabi

lity

map

s an

d ri

sk m

aps

wer

e al

so c

reat

ed.

・ C

ount

erpa

rt o

f K

ab/K

ota

BP

BD

s w

ere

enga

ged

in c

olle

ctin

g hi

stor

ical

rec

ords

of

disa

ster

eve

nts

and

its

map

ping

man

uall

y (f

or

haza

rd m

ap)

as w

ell a

s co

llet

ing

stat

isti

cal d

ata

and

com

pili

ng th

em a

s da

taba

se (

for

vuln

erab

ilit

y m

ap).

The

Pro

ject

con

duct

ed

digi

tiza

tion

of

colle

cted

dat

a on

GIS

at t

he G

IS c

orne

r es

tabl

ishe

d at

the

prov

inci

al B

PB

D.

・ R

egar

ding

cap

acit

y m

ap, F

GD

for

cap

acit

y as

sess

men

t was

car

ried

out

at o

nly

1 K

abup

aten

(on

11

Feb

201

4 in

Kab

. Bol

aang

M

ongo

ndow

Sou

th).

As

for

othe

r K

ab/K

ota,

the

Pro

ject

con

duct

ed s

impl

ifie

d ca

paci

ty a

sses

smen

ts b

ecau

se F

GD

did

n’t t

ake

plac

e du

e to

mai

nly

thei

r bu

dget

con

stra

int.

・ D

isas

ter

Ris

k A

sses

smen

t Mat

rix

for

each

Kab

/Kot

a (r

isk

anal

yzed

at D

esa

leve

l for

haz

ard

and

vuln

erab

ilit

y) w

as a

lso

deve

lope

d in

Jan

-Feb

201

4 w

ith

prac

tica

l pro

cedu

res

prep

ared

by

the

Pro

ject

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith

Per

ka N

o. 2

/201

2 (G

ener

al G

uide

line

on

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Ass

essm

ent f

or D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lann

ing)

. The

mat

rix

was

incl

uded

in R

DM

P.

・

GIS

equ

ipm

ent (

soft

war

e A

rc G

IS, c

ompu

ter,

A0-

size

plo

tter

) at

the

GIS

cor

ner

was

han

ded

over

to th

e pr

ovin

cial

BP

BD

, dat

ed

on 2

8 M

ar 2

014.

・

GIS

tech

nica

l tra

inin

g on

cre

atin

g m

aps

wit

h G

IS s

oftw

are

was

con

duct

ed tw

ice

as f

ollo

ws

by th

e P

roje

ct. T

echn

ical

tran

sfer

als

o to

ok p

lace

wit

h on

-the

-job

trai

ning

.

M

eeti

ng

Dat

e P

arti

cipa

nts

1st W

/S

27 M

ay 2

013

3 of

fice

rs f

rom

Pro

vinc

ial B

PB

D N

orth

Sul

awes

i

2 of

fice

rs f

rom

BP

BD

Min

ahas

a N

orth

1

from

BP

BD

Min

ahas

a S

outh

1

from

BP

BD

Min

ahas

a

2nd W

/S

16 J

une

2013

5

offi

cers

fro

m P

rovi

ncia

l BP

BD

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi

(2nd

Tar

get a

rea

of N

TB

) ・

10 K

ab/K

ota

in N

TB

are

exp

ecte

d to

hav

e ha

zard

and

ris

k m

aps

thro

ugh

acti

viti

es a

s fo

llow

s.

M

eeti

ng

Dat

e an

d V

enue

M

ain

agen

da

Kic

k-of

f W

/S19

Jun

e 20

14 (

mor

ning

) at

Kot

a M

atar

am

Two

C/P

of

BN

PB

att

ende

d.

(Q

uest

ionn

aire

for

pro

vinc

ial a

nd K

ab/K

ota

BP

BD

cap

acit

y as

sess

men

t was

dis

trib

uted

.)

1st W

/S

19 J

une

2014

(ev

enin

g) a

nd 2

0 Ju

ne 2

014

(who

le d

ay)

R

eque

stin

g to

dev

elop

dis

aste

r hi

stor

y m

aps

(fiv

e di

sast

ers)

and

dis

cuss

dis

aste

r ri

sk a

nd c

apac

ity

asse

ssm

ent a

t vil

lage

leve

l.

2nd W

/S

11 S

ep 2

014

in K

ota

Mat

aram

, Lom

bok

B

asic

GIS

trai

ning

for

dig

itiz

ing

data

Par

tial

ly

Ach

ieve

d (a

ctiv

itie

s in

N

TB

sti

ll

ongo

ing)

A-23

(12-

16 S

ep w

ith

foll

ow-u

p W

/S)

18

Sep

201

4 in

Kot

a B

ima,

Sum

baw

a (1

9-20

Sep

wit

h fo

llow

-up

W/S

)

FG

D f

or d

isas

ter

risk

and

cap

acit

y as

sess

men

t at K

ab/K

ota

Add

itio

nal W

/S2

Oct

201

4 G

IS T

echn

ical

W/S

3rd

W/S

18

Nov

2014

in K

ota

Mat

aram

, Lom

bok

20 N

ov 2

014

in K

ab. B

ima,

Sum

baw

a

4th W

/S

14 J

an 2

015

in K

ota

Mat

aram

, Lom

bok

21 J

an 2

015

in K

ab. B

ima,

Sum

baw

a F

ollo

w-u

p V

isit

ing

each

kab

/kot

a on

7-2

4 A

pril

201

5 F

inal

izin

g ri

sk a

sses

smen

t mat

rix

and

draf

t map

s (h

azar

d,

vuln

erab

ilit

y, r

isk)

(5th W

/S)

(Sch

edul

ed in

Jun

e 20

15)

To f

urth

er d

evel

op h

azar

d m

aps

(e.g

. inc

ludi

ng e

valu

atio

n ro

utes

, etc

.)

・

Bas

ic a

nd o

ther

info

rmat

ion

on h

azar

d, v

ulne

rabi

lity

, cap

acit

y, a

nd d

isas

ter

risk

wer

e co

llat

ed (

Kab

/Kot

a B

PB

D p

repa

red

hist

oric

al d

isas

ter

map

s m

anua

lly)

and

map

s w

ere

alm

ost c

ompl

eted

at t

he G

IS c

orne

r es

tabl

ishe

d in

the

NT

B p

rovi

ncia

l BP

BD

(d

igit

izin

g th

e da

ta)

・

As

for

the

capa

city

ass

essm

ent,

FG

D f

or d

isas

ter

risk

and

cap

acit

y as

sess

men

t at K

ab/K

ota

leve

l wer

e co

nduc

ted

at a

ll th

e 10

B

PB

D in

Sep

tem

ber

2014

by

a lo

cal N

GO

con

trac

ted

by th

e P

roje

ct. T

he r

esul

t (ea

ch K

ab/K

ota

wer

e gi

ven

1 sc

ore)

was

rep

orte

d to

the

Pro

ject

. FD

G a

t Des

a le

vel f

or c

apac

ity

asse

ssm

ent i

s ex

pect

ed to

be

unde

rtak

en b

y ea

ch B

PB

D.

・ D

isas

ter

Ris

k A

sses

smen

t Mat

rix

for

each

Kab

/Kot

a w

ill b

e pr

epar

ed b

y ea

ch B

PB

D to

be

incl

uded

in th

e R

DM

P.

（Ta

ngib

le o

utpu

ts）

1)

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

for

Cre

atio

n of

Haz

ard

Map

for

Reg

enci

es/M

unic

ipal

itie

s (V

er. 2

) S

ep 2

013.

2)

Haz

ard

Map

, Vul

nera

bili

ty M

ap, C

apac

ity

Map

, Dis

aste

r R

isk

Map

of

all t

he 1

5 K

ota/

Kab

upat

en in

SU

LU

T.

3) H

azar

d M

ap, V

ulne

rabi

lity

Map

, Cap

acit

y M

ap, D

isas

ter

Ris

k M

ap o

f al

l the

10

Kot

a/K

abup

aten

in N

TB

(D

raft

)

・ H

azar

d m

aps

of K

ab/K

ota

are

conf

irm

ed a

s ve

ry u

sefu

l by

BP

BD

SU

LU

T a

s th

ey a

re th

e fi

rst o

ffic

ial m

ap o

f it

s ki

nd. T

he m

aps

wer

e sh

ared

wit

h ot

her

agen

cies

suc

h as

PU

for

spa

tial

pla

nnin

g as

all

Kab

/Kot

a ar

e re

quir

ed to

pre

pare

a s

pati

al p

lan.

・In

put t

owar

d th

e re

visi

on o

f P

erka

No.

2/2

012

(Gen

eral

Gui

deli

ne o

n D

isas

ter

Ris

k A

sses

smen

t for

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t P

lann

ing)

con

tinu

es.

3. T

he c

apac

ity

for

form

ulat

ion

of R

egio

nal d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent p

lans

for

re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

in th

e ta

rget

are

a is

enh

ance

d.

3-1.

Num

ber

of th

e re

genc

ies/

mun

icip

alit

ies

whe

re

regi

onal

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t pl

ans

are

form

ulat

ed a

t re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

leve

l in

the

targ

et a

rea.

(1st T

arge

t are

a of

SU

LU

T)

・14

Kab

/Kot

a ar

e fu

rnis

hed

wit

h R

DM

Ps

form

ulat

ed in

the

Pro

ject

as

of A

pril

201

5 K

abup

aten

/Kot

a F

orm

ulat

ion

Sig

natu

re (

for

legi

slat

ion)

B

PB

D D

irec

tor

May

or

1 K

ota

Man

ado

Com

plet

ed (

deve

lope

d as

the

sam

ple

RD

MP

)

Aug

201

4 ○

2 K

ota

Tom

ohon

C

ompl

eted

O

ct 2

014

3

Kot

a B

itun

g C

ompl

eted

F

eb 2

014

○

4 K

ota

Kot

amob

agu

Com

plet

ed

Mar

201

4

5 K

ab. M

inah

asa

in th

e B

NP

B p

roje

ct b

ased

on

Per

ka N

o.4/

2008

6

Kab

. Min

ahas

a N

orth

C

ompl

eted

M

ar 2

014

○

7 K

ab. M

inah

asa

Sou

th

Com

plet

ed

Oct

201

4

8 K

ab. M

inah

asa

Sou

thea

st

Com

plet

ed

Aug

201

4 ○

9

Kab

. Bol

aang

Mon

gond

owC

ompl

eted

O

ct 2

014

10

Kab

. Bol

Mon

Nor

th

Com

plet

ed

Oct

201

4 ○

11

K

ab. B

ol M

on S

outh

C

ompl

eted

N

ov 2

014

○

12K

ab. B

ol M

on E

ast

Com

plet

ed

Oct

201

4 ○

13

Kab

. Tal

aud

(isl

ands

) C

ompl

eted

M

ar 2

014

14

Kab

. San

gihe

(is

land

s)

Com

plet

ed

Nov

201

4 ○

15

Kab

. Sit

aro

(Isl

ands

) C

ompl

eted

M

ar 2

015

○

・T

he 1

4 R

DM

Ps

abov

e w

ere

prod

uced

thro

ugh

a se

ries

of

wor

ksho

p al

ong

wit

h th

e fo

llow

ing

docu

men

ts.

Par

tial

ly

Ach

ieve

d (a

ctiv

itie

s in

N

TB

sti

ll

ongo

ing)

A-24

1) T

echn

ical

Gui

deli

ne o

f R

DM

P fo

r K

abup

aten

/Kot

a (V

er.1

.5),

Aug

ust 2

014.

Thi

s w

ill b

e fi

nali

zed

in li

ne w

ith

the

foll

owin

g tw

o do

cum

ents

that

are

cur

rent

ly u

nder

rev

isio

n

・P

erka

No.

4/20

08 (

The

Gui

deli

ne f

or F

orm

ulat

ion

of th

e D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan)

・

Nat

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n (2

010-

2014

) cu

rren

tly

bein

g re

vise

d fo

r th

e ne

xt 5

yea

rs (

2015

-201

9)

2) R

DM

P fo

rmul

atio

n su

ppor

t app

lica

tion

(V

er.1

.7)

Exc

el

3) S

ampl

e R

DM

P -

Dis

aste

r P

lan

of M

anad

o C

ity

(Ver

.0.5

) S

ep 2

013

M

eeti

ng

Dat

e A

gend

a K

ick-

Off

W/S

10

Oct

201

2 F

orm

ulat

ion

of R

DM

P: C

hapt

er 1

Gen

eral

, (In

trod

ucti

on a

nd r

egio

nal o

verv

iew

) pa

rtic

ipat

ed b

y B

NP

B.

2nd W

/S

14 D

ec 2

012

For

mul

atio

n of

RD

MP

: Cha

pter

1 G

ener

al, (

Dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t pol

icy,

ac

tivi

ties

for

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t)

3rd W

/S

14 F

eb 2

013

For

mul

atio

n of

RD

MP

: Cha

pter

2 D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent A

ctiv

ity

(All

ocat

ion

of

task

and

res

ourc

es)

4th W

/S

30 M

ay 2

013

For

mul

atio

n of

RD

MP

: Cha

pter

3 M

onit

orin

g, e

valu

atio

n an

d re

port

ing

5th W

/S

5 S

ep 2

013

For

mul

atio

n of

RD

MP

: Ann

ex (

Act

ion

Pla

n)

6th W

/S

18 D

ec 2

013

Exp

lana

tion

and

exe

rcis

e on

act

ion

plan

W

rap-

up W

/S

27 M

ar 2

014

Tota

l 200

par

tici

pant

s fr

om B

NP

B, B

PB

D, p

rovi

ncia

l, re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

or

gani

zati

ons,

pol

ice,

arm

y, u

nive

rsit

ies,

and

NG

Os.

F

ollo

w-u

p 10

-24

May

201

4 2

loca

l con

sult

ant v

isit

ed M

anad

o, T

omoh

on, S

itar

o, S

angi

he, M

inah

asa

Sou

th,

Min

ahas

a S

outh

east

28

Sep

- 4

Oct

20

14

2 lo

cal c

onsu

ltan

t vis

ited

Bol

aang

Mon

gond

ow, M

B N

orth

, MB

Sou

th, M

B E

ast.

Tota

l 10

Kab

/Kot

a w

ere

visi

ted

in M

ay a

nd O

ctob

er to

geth

er.

The

oth

er K

ab.K

ota

whi

ch w

ere

not v

isit

had

alr

eady

fin

ishe

d th

e fo

rmul

atio

n of

R

DM

P by

the

tim

e.

(2nd

Tar

get a

rea

of N

TB

) ・

10 K

ab/K

ota

are

expe

cted

to b

e fu

rnis

hed

wit

h R

DM

Ps

thro

ugh

the

Pro

ject

in th

e fo

llow

ing

acti

viti

es.

M

eeti

ng

D

ate,

Age

nda

Pre

p. m

eeti

ng7

Apr

201

4 In

trod

ucti

on o

f th

e P

roje

ct to

NT

B

Kic

k-of

f W

/S19

Jun

e 20

14 (

mor

ning

) Tw

o C

/P f

rom

BN

PB

att

ende

d.

1st W

/S

19 J

une

2014

(af

tern

oon)

N

eces

sity

of

RD

MP

and

Cha

.1

Cas

e of

SU

LU

T b

y B

PB

D K

ota

Bit

ung

(Mr.

Alf

indo

)2nd

W/S

23

Oct

201

4 at

Pro

vinc

ial B

PB

D, L

ombo

k 27

Oct

201

4 at

the

Kab

. Sum

baw

a W

est B

PB

D

Exp

lana

tion

and

pra

ctic

e fo

r C

ha.2

(ac

tivi

ties

an

d ro

le o

f re

late

d or

gani

zati

ons)

3rd

W/S

14

Jan

201

5 at

Pro

vinc

ial B

PB

D in

Kot

a M

atar

am,

22 J

an 2

015

at R

egen

cy B

PB

D in

Kab

. Bim

a P

ract

icin

g th

e us

e of

“Te

chni

cal G

uide

line

A

ppli

cati

on”

4th

W/S

16

Apr

201

5, L

ombo

k H

eld

at B

PB

D T

NB

par

tici

pate

d by

8 K

ab/K

ota

for

Cha

.3

(Wra

p-up

) (s

ched

uled

in S

epte

mbe

r 20

15)

Fin

aliz

atio

n

・C

urre

nt s

tatu

s of

RD

MP

form

ulat

ion

at e

ach

Kab

/Kot

a.

Kab

upat

en/K

ota

Exi

sten

ce o

f R

DM

P

Pro

gres

s as

of A

pril

201

5 1

Lom

bok

Isla

nd

Kot

a M

atar

am

○ b

y B

NP

B P

roje

ctD

ata

entr

y fo

r ap

plic

atio

n (C

ha.2

) co

mpl

eted

2

Kab

. Lom

bok

Nor

th○

by

Loc

al N

GO

D

ata

entr

y fo

r ap

plic

atio

n (C

ha.2

) co

mpl

eted

3

Kab

. Lom

bok

Wes

t ○

by

BN

PB

Pro

ject

Dat

a en

try

of C

ha.2

ong

oing

4

Kab

. Lom

bok

Cen

tral

- C

ha.1

com

plet

ed

5 K

ab. L

ombo

k E

ast

○ b

y L

ocal

NG

O

Dat

a en

try

for

appl

icat

ion

(Cha

.2)

com

plet

ed

6 S

umba

wa

Isla

nd

Kot

a B

ima

○ b

y L

ocal

NG

O

Dat

a en

try

for

appl

icat

ion

(Cha

.2)

com

plet

ed

Con

sult

atio

n w

ith

rela

ted

orga

niza

tion

s on

goin

g

7 K

ab. B

ima

○ b

y B

NP

B P

roje

ctC

ompl

eted

8

Kab

. Dom

pu

- C

ha.1

bei

ng d

evel

oped

A-25

9 K

ab. S

umba

wa

- D

ata

entr

y fo

r ap

plic

atio

n (C

ha.2

) co

mpl

eted

10

Kab

. Sum

baw

a W

est

- D

ata

entr

y fo

r ap

plic

atio

n (C

ha.2

) co

mpl

eted

(A

ctiv

ity

on S

OP

)

・T

he a

ctiv

ity

for

deve

lopi

ng T

echn

ical

Gui

deli

ne f

or F

orm

ulat

ion

of S

OP

was

com

plet

ed in

Mar

ch 2

014

in S

UL

UT.

Rev

isio

n of

the

guid

elin

e is

not

incl

uded

in th

e 2nd

hal

f of

the

Pro

ject

per

iod.

・

SO

P of

Sit

aro

for

Fac

ing

Dis

aste

r V

olca

no K

aran

geta

ng w

as d

evel

oped

and

fin

aliz

ed in

the

Pro

ject

. ・

Kot

a To

moh

on a

lrea

dy h

ad S

OP

befo

re th

e P

roje

ct, a

nd h

ad it

rev

ised

in S

epte

mbe

r 20

14 b

y pr

epar

ing

and

incl

udin

g w

orki

ng

proc

edur

es e

ncou

rage

d an

d su

ppor

ted

by th

e P

roje

ct.

・

Kot

a B

itun

g al

so h

ad S

OP

(tar

geti

ng f

lood

), w

hich

was

fin

aliz

ed in

Sep

201

4.

4. T

he c

apac

ity

for

cond

ucti

ng

Dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t ex

erci

ses

at th

e re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

in th

e ta

rget

are

a is

enh

ance

d.

4-1.

Num

ber

of d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

im

plem

ente

d in

the

targ

et a

rea.

（1st

Tar

get a

rea

of S

UL

UT）

・

Tota

l 15

disa

ster

man

agem

ent e

xerc

ises

(1

DIG

, 13

TT

X, 1

CP

X)

wer

e im

plem

ente

d in

the

Pro

ject

.

M

eeti

ng

Dat

e A

gend

a 1)

DIG

10

Oct

201

2, M

anad

o

Dis

aste

r Im

agin

atio

n G

ame

at th

e jo

int k

ick-

off

wor

ksho

p w

ith

the

Out

put 3

. 2)

TT

X

18 O

ct –

6 D

ec 2

012

in 1

3 K

ab/K

ota

Tabl

e To

p E

xerc

ise

cond

ucte

d at

13

Kab

/Kot

a vi

site

d by

the

Pro

ject

team

. -

Wor

ksho

p fo

r S

OP

For

mul

atio

n (1

1-12

Jun

201

3, M

anad

o)

(2 d

ay w

orks

hop

for

the

prep

arat

ion

of C

PX

sch

edul

ed in

Sep

20

13.)

-

Wor

ksho

p fo

r C

PX

pr

epar

atio

n (4

Sep

201

3, B

itun

g)

(Exp

lana

tion

on

the

role

of

“Pla

yer”

in C

PX

sch

edul

ed in

Sep

20

13.)

3)

CP

X

18 S

ep 2

013

in M

anad

o an

d si

mul

tane

ousl

y in

Sit

aro

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Dri

ll (

Com

man

d P

ost E

xerc

ise)

wit

h th

e pa

rtic

ipat

ion

of B

NP

B, P

rovi

ncia

l BP

BD

, M

anad

o/B

itun

g/S

itaro

BP

BD

・

The

act

ivit

y fo

r de

velo

ping

Tec

hnic

al g

uide

line

for

dis

aste

r re

lief

exe

rcis

e w

as c

ompl

eted

in M

arch

201

4 in

SU

LU

T. R

evis

ion

of

the

guid

elin

e is

not

incl

uded

in th

e 2nd

hal

f of

the

Pro

ject

per

iod.

(2

nd T

arge

t are

a of

NT

B)

・D

isas

ter

man

agem

ent d

rill

wil

l not

be

cond

ucte

d in

the

NT

B.

Ach

ieve

d

4-2.

Num

ber

of a

ctiv

itie

s on

C

BD

RM

in th

e ta

rget

are

a.

(1st T

arge

t are

a of

SU

LU

T）

・

To

tal 1

0 C

BD

RM

act

ivit

ies

(1 le

ader

trai

ning

, 3 c

omm

unit

y W

S, 1

Eva

luat

ion

dril

l) w

ere

cond

ucte

d at

the

two

pilo

t vil

lage

s.

1) D

esa

Moy

ag, K

otam

obag

u 2)

Kel

urah

an B

ebal

i, S

itar

o

M

eeti

ng

Dat

e A

gend

a K

otam

obag

u S

itar

o -

Kic

k-of

f W

orks

hop

10

Oct

201

2 In

trod

ucti

on to

CB

DR

M a

ctiv

itie

s at

Man

ado

- 1s

t Wor

ksho

p 11

-12

Oct

201

2 E

nhan

cem

ent o

f C

BD

RM

in N

orth

Sul

awes

i B

NP

B g

ave

lect

ure

on C

BD

RM

1)

C

BD

RM

Tra

inin

g fo

r C

omm

unit

y L

eade

rs

21-2

2 F

eb 2

013

26-2

7 F

eb 2

013

Tra

inin

g fo

r co

mm

unit

y le

ader

s in

dis

aste

r re

sili

ent

prog

ram

2)

1st

Com

mun

ity

Wor

ksho

p

24-2

5 A

pr 2

013

17-1

8 A

pr 2

013

Tow

ards

Dis

aste

r R

esil

ient

Vil

lage

in K

abup

aten

S

itar

o 3)

2nd

Com

mun

ity

W/S

(i

nter

nal)

22

Jul

y 20

13

16 J

uly

2013

4)

3rd C

omm

unit

y W

orks

hop

29 A

ug 2

013

5 S

ep 2

013

Pre

para

tion

of

the

CP

X s

ched

ule

on 1

8 S

ep 2

013.

5)

Eva

cuat

ion

Dri

ll

10 S

ep 2

013

18 S

ep 2

013

-

Fol

low

-up

visi

t O

ct-N

ov 2

013

Fin

aliz

atio

n of

DM

Pla

n an

d H

azar

d M

ao

・ A

ctiv

itie

s w

ere

capt

ured

in S

umm

ary

Rep

ort o

f JI

CA

Tra

inin

g P

rogr

am f

or E

nhan

cem

ent o

f C

BD

RM

Act

ivit

ies

in N

orth

Sul

awes

i (1

0-12

Oct

201

2).

・

“D

isas

ter

Res

ilie

nt V

illa

ge”

Pro

gram

– A

s a

Goo

d P

ract

ice

Mod

el –

(V

er.1

.0)

Mar

201

4 w

as d

evel

oped

, whi

ch in

clud

es V

illa

ge

Par

tial

ly

Ach

ieve

d (a

ctiv

itie

s in

N

TB

sti

ll

ongo

ing)

A-26

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

ns a

nd c

omm

unit

y ha

zard

map

s of

the

two

pilo

t vil

lage

(D

esa

Moy

ag, K

elur

ahan

Beb

ali)

.

(2

nd T

arge

t are

a of

NT

B)

・To

tal 6

CB

DR

M a

ctiv

itie

s (1

lead

er tr

aini

ng, 4

com

mun

ity

W/S

, and

1 e

valu

atio

n dr

ill)

wer

e co

nduc

ted

at o

ne p

ilot

vil

lage

.

1) D

esa

Kut

a, K

ab. L

ombo

k C

entr

al

M

eeti

ng

D

ate,

Age

nda

- K

ick-

off

W/S

19

Jun

e 20

14 (

mor

ning

) O

vera

ll P

roje

ct in

trod

ucti

on

- In

trod

ucto

ry

trai

ning

19

Jun

e 20

14 (

afte

rnoo

n) a

nd

20 J

une

2014

(w

hole

day

)

Tra

inin

g fo

r K

ab/K

ota

BP

BD

sta

ff in

cha

rge

of C

BD

RM

on

the

guid

elin

e fo

r D

isas

ter

Res

ilie

nt C

omm

unit

y an

d ts

unam

i, co

mm

unit

y ri

sk a

sses

smen

t, co

mm

unit

y ea

rly

war

ning

sy

stem

, haz

ard

map

, DR

MP

and

acti

on p

lan

at v

illa

ge le

vel.

1)

C

omm

unit

y L

eade

r W

/S

29-3

0 O

ct 2

014

at K

ab.

Lom

bok

Cen

tral

W

/S f

or le

ader

s fr

om 1

2 vi

llag

es f

rom

Lom

bok

Cen

tral

. C/P

fr

om B

NP

B g

ave

lect

ure

on D

isas

ter

Res

ilie

nt C

omm

unit

y 2)

1st

Com

mun

ity

W/S

10

-11

Nov

201

4, D

esa

Kut

a fa

cili

tate

d an

d pa

rtly

lect

ured

by

the

BP

BD

Lom

bok

Cen

tral

.

3)

CB

DR

M T

rain

ers’

tr

aini

ng

11 D

ec 2

014,

Kot

a M

atar

am,

23

Dec

201

4, K

ab.S

umba

wa,

24

Dec

201

4, K

ota

Bim

a,

To d

evel

op 2

2 K

ab/K

ota

BP

BD

sta

ff m

embe

rs a

s fa

cili

tato

rs.

4)

2nd C

omm

unit

y W

/S

19 J

an 2

015,

Des

a K

uta

21 J

an 2

015,

Sum

baw

a P

arti

cipa

ted

by B

PB

D C

/P s

taff

as

obse

rver

s.

C/P

fro

m B

NP

B g

ave

open

ing

rem

arks

and

att

ende

d Q

&A

se

ssio

n.

5)

3rd C

omm

unit

y W

/S

13 A

pril

201

5, D

esa

Kut

a

6)

Eva

cuat

ion

Dri

ll

18 A

pr 2

015

・

Act

ivit

ies

of D

isas

ter

Res

ilie

nt V

illa

ge (

base

d on

BN

PB

Per

ka N

o.1/

2012

) w

ere

unde

rtak

en a

t Kab

. Lom

bok

Nor

th, K

ab.

Lom

bok

Wes

t, an

d ot

her

Kab

/Kot

a in

col

labo

rati

on w

ith

NG

O. A

s fo

r 20

15, i

ts a

ctiv

itie

s ha

ve n

ot b

een

star

ted

as y

et. B

NP

B’s

Te

chni

cal G

uide

line

for

the

Impl

emen

tati

on o

f D

isas

ter

Res

ilie

nt V

illa

ge P

rogr

am f

or 2

015

is e

xpec

ted

to b

e is

sued

in M

ay.

・

D

iscu

ssio

n an

d co

nsul

tati

on f

or s

etti

ng u

p si

gn b

oard

s to

indi

cate

eva

cuat

ion

poin

ts in

cas

e of

tsun

ami (

cons

ider

ing

that

NT

B is

fa

mou

s fo

r si

ghts

eein

g)

(O

ther

act

ivit

ies

on C

BD

RM

) ・

14-1

8 Ju

ly 2

014:

info

rmat

ion

shar

ing

at th

e tr

aini

ng b

y B

NP

B “

disa

ster

res

ilie

nt v

illa

ge”

・

9-11

Oct

201

4: p

arti

cipa

tion

in th

e C

BD

RM

Nat

iona

l Con

fere

nce

as a

res

ourc

e pe

rson

・

18-2

7 S

ep 2

014:

Sup

port

to N

GO

(K

yoto

Uni

vers

ity

Dis

aste

r P

reve

ntio

n S

choo

l) v

isit

ing

scho

ols

in N

TB

5.

Nat

ionw

ide

diss

emin

atio

n ac

tivi

ties

are

impl

emen

ted.

5-

1.Te

chni

cal G

uide

line

for

fo

rmul

atio

n of

RD

MP

is

util

ized

as

refe

renc

e do

cum

ents

of

BN

PB

・ T

echn

ical

Gui

deli

ne o

f R

DM

P fo

r K

abup

aten

/Kot

a (V

er.1

.5),

Aug

ust 2

014

is p

lann

ed to

be

revi

sed

base

d on

the

resu

lts

of

acti

viti

es in

NT

B, t

akin

g in

to c

onsi

dera

tion

of

the

fina

liza

tion

sta

tus

of th

e fo

llow

ing

two

docu

men

ts.

1)

(D

raft

) N

atio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

(201

5-20

19)

2) P

erka

BN

PB

4-2

008

(Gui

deli

ne o

n th

e F

orm

ulat

ion

of th

e D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan)

cur

rent

ly u

nder

rev

isio

n ・

The

tech

nica

l gui

deli

ne is

exp

ecte

d to

be

auth

oriz

ed/a

ppro

ved

by B

NP

B u

pon

its

com

plet

ion.

The

gui

deli

ne c

an b

e di

stri

bute

d in

th

e A

nnua

l BN

PB

gen

eral

mee

ting

in O

ctob

er 2

015

(and

trai

ning

can

als

o be

con

side

red.

)

Exp

ecte

d to

be

ach

ieve

d (f

inal

izat

ion

of th

e gu

idel

ine

is

nece

ssar

y)

5-2.

Num

ber

of e

vent

s to

sup

port

na

tion

wid

e di

ssem

inat

ion

acti

viti

es o

n fo

rmul

atio

n of

R

DM

P

・3e

vent

s w

ere

unde

rtak

en f

or d

isse

min

atio

n of

RD

MP

form

ulat

ion

met

hod.

E

vent

s D

ate

Age

nda

1)P

rese

ntat

ion

at s

ide

even

ts o

f di

sast

er m

anag

emen

t dri

ll

19 M

ar 2

014

・ L

arge

-sca

le d

isas

ter

man

agem

ent d

rill

at P

adan

g in

S

umat

era

Bar

at

2)P

rese

ntat

ion

and

pane

l dis

cuss

ion

at A

nnua

l BN

PB

gen

eral

mee

ting

(

3 da

ys)

14 O

ct 2

014

・P

rese

ntat

ion

on th

e te

chni

cal g

uide

line

on

RD

MP

wit

h B

AP

PE

NA

S a

nd B

NP

B

・P

anel

dis

cuss

ion

part

icip

ated

by

Kot

a B

itun

g on

goo

d pr

acti

ces

from

the

Pro

ject

3)

Tech

nica

l tra

inin

g fo

r B

NP

B

8 -

9 Ja

n 20

15

・T

rain

ing

for

30 B

NP

B o

ffic

ers

at B

NP

B c

entr

al o

ffic

e on

the

guid

elin

e fo

r fo

rmul

atin

g R

DM

Ps.

Par

tial

ly

Ach

ieve

d (f

inal

izat

ion

of th

e gu

idel

ine

is

nece

ssar

y)

A-27

- P

lann

ed (

Pre

sent

atio

n at

ann

ual

BN

PB

con

fere

nce)

(O

ct 2

015)

(・

Dis

trib

utio

n of

aut

hori

zed

tech

nica

l gui

deli

ne o

n R

DM

Ps

is

unde

r co

nsid

erat

ion)

・

Bes

ides

RD

MP,

the

prep

arat

ion

of e

arth

quak

e ha

zard

map

and

its

nati

onw

ide

diss

emin

atio

n ar

e be

ing

prom

oted

.

Act

ivit

ies

Dat

e D

ate,

Age

nda

1)1st

foc

us g

roup

dis

cuss

ion

on

eart

hqua

ke h

azar

d as

sess

men

t 16

Jun

201

4 at

Ban

dung

,

invi

ting

BN

PB

, BIT

, BM

KG

and

oth

er o

rgan

izat

ions

as

a pa

rt

of n

atio

nwid

e ex

tens

ion

of e

arth

quak

e ha

zard

map

2)

Pre

para

tory

mee

ting

wit

h B

NP

B

24 N

ov 2

014

betw

een

BN

PB

and

JIC

A e

xper

ts f

or d

evel

opin

g E

arth

quak

e ha

zard

map

3)

2nd F

GD

(Te

chni

cal W

S)

on

Ear

thqu

ake

Haz

ard

Ass

essm

ent

13 J

an 2

015

ho

sted

by

BN

PB

invi

ting

rel

ated

age

ncie

s (B

G, B

MK

G, U

GM

, B

PP

T, P

U, I

TB

) (U

N W

orld

Con

fere

nce

on D

isas

ter

Ris

k R

educ

tion

, 201

5 S

enda

i, Ja

pan)

・

ID 5

30: M

ains

trea

min

g D

RR

into

Dev

elop

men

t thr

ough

pra

ctic

al D

M P

lann

ing

at th

e L

ocal

Lev

el: L

esso

ns L

earn

ed f

rom

BN

PB

an

d JI

CA

init

iati

ves

in I

ndon

esia

・

ID 2

51: B

uild

ing

Res

ilie

nce

at th

e L

ocal

Lev

el: E

xper

ienc

es f

rom

Ind

ones

ia a

nd J

apan

(JI

CA

, BN

PB

, AD

RC

)

A-28

Ap

pen

dix

11:

Lis

t of

doc

umen

ts d

evel

oped

in t

he

Pro

ject

Out

put

Doc

umen

t Tit

le

Rel

evan

t Reg

ulat

ions

R

elat

ion

wit

h ex

isti

ng r

egul

atio

ns/d

ocum

ents

O

utpu

t 1

1) T

echn

ical

gui

deli

ne f

or c

olle

ctin

g an

d st

orin

g di

sast

er

data

/inf

orm

atio

n

Dat

a fo

rmat

s

・P

re D

isas

ter

Dat

a: A

. Kab

upat

en/K

ota

Pro

file

・

Pre

Dis

aste

r D

ata:

B. R

esou

rces

Ava

ilab

ilit

y –

Log

isti

c ・

Init

ial R

ecor

d of

Dis

aste

r In

cide

nt I

nfor

mat

ion

(dai

ly

repo

rt)

・

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e D

ata:

Dis

aste

r In

cide

nt F

orm

・

Sur

vey

in D

isas

ter

Loc

atio

n F

orm

1) P

erka

BN

PB

8-2

011

(Sta

ndar

diza

tion

of D

isas

ter

Dat

a)

2) P

erka

BN

PB

7-2

012

(Gui

deli

ne o

n da

ta m

anag

emen

t and

Dis

aste

r In

form

atio

n)

3) P

erka

BN

PB

13-

2010

(G

uide

line

on

Sea

rch,

Res

cue

& E

vacu

atio

n)

4) T

echn

ical

Gui

deli

ne o

f D

IBI

for A

dmin

istr

atio

n 5)

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

of

DIB

I fo

r U

ser

(D

IBI

was

dev

elop

ed in

coo

pera

tion

of

BA

PP

EN

AS

, BN

PB

, MoH

A, U

ND

P an

d D

FID

)

・ P

erka

BN

PB

8-2

011

prov

ides

for

a d

ata

form

at

for

each

of

the

3 ph

ases

(P

re D

isas

ter,

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e, a

nd P

ost D

isas

ter)

. T

he

Pro

ject

fur

ther

div

ided

the

phas

es in

to f

ive,

thus

ha

ving

pre

pare

d 5

data

for

mat

by

also

taki

ng

into

con

side

rati

on P

erka

BN

PB

13-

2010

.

・ T

he te

chni

cal g

uide

line

is e

xpec

ted

to b

e us

ed a

s a

refe

rent

ial m

ater

ial t

o su

pple

men

t the

Per

ka

BN

PB

8-2

011

mai

nly

for

the

use

at K

ab/K

ota

leve

l.

Out

put 2

2)

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

for

Cre

atio

n of

Haz

ard

Map

for

R

egen

cies

/Mun

icip

alit

ies

(Ver

. 2)

Sep

201

3 1)

Per

ka B

NP

B 2

-201

2 (G

ener

al G

uide

line

on

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Ass

essm

ent f

or D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lann

ing)

→ c

urre

ntly

und

er r

evis

ion

2) P

erka

BN

PB

3-2

012

(Gui

deli

ne o

n R

egio

nal C

apac

ity

Ass

essm

ent i

n D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent)

3)

(D

raft

) R

evis

ion

of P

erka

No.

2/2

012

・T

he te

chni

cal g

uide

line

can

be

a re

fere

ntia

l at

tach

men

t to

the

Per

ka B

NP

B 2

-201

2 w

hich

de

scri

bes

the

appr

oach

to d

isas

ter

risk

as

sess

men

t (ha

zard

, vul

nera

bili

ty, c

apac

ity)

.

Out

put 3

3)

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

of

Reg

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t P

lan

for

Kab

upat

en/K

ota

(Ver

. 1.5

) Aug

201

4 ・

Tech

nica

l sup

port

app

lica

tion

for

for

mul

atin

g R

DM

Ps

(Ver

.1.7

) ・

Exa

mpl

e of

RD

MP

(Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n of

M

anad

o C

ity,

Ver

.0.5

, Sep

201

3)

1) P

erka

BN

PB

4-2

008

(Gui

deli

ne o

n th

e F

orm

ulat

ion

of th

e D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan)

→ c

urre

ntly

und

er r

evis

ion

2) P

erka

BN

PB

3-2

012

(Gui

deli

ne o

n R

egio

nal C

apac

ity

Ass

essm

ent i

n D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent)

3)

TO

R f

or F

orm

ulat

ion

of R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

in K

abup

aten

/Kot

a in

S

ulaw

esi I

slan

d (F

Y20

12)

prep

ared

by

PN

PB

4)

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n of

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi P

rovi

nce

(201

2-20

16)

5) D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

of K

abup

aten

Min

ahas

a (2

013-

2017

) fi

nali

zed

in 2

013

6) D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

of N

TB

Pro

vinc

e (2

012-

2016

)

7) D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

of K

ota

Mat

aram

(20

14-2

018)

8)

(D

raft

) N

atio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

(201

5-20

19) →

sti

ll u

nder

for

mul

atio

n

・ T

he te

chni

cal g

uide

line

can

be

an a

n an

nex

to

the

Per

ka B

NP

B 4

-200

8 w

ith

offi

cial

en

dors

men

t/ap

prov

al o

f B

NP

B (

e.g.

sig

natu

re)

・ T

he te

chnc

ial g

uide

line

incl

udes

mor

e de

tail

ed

desc

ript

ions

on

divi

sion

of

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

and

acti

on p

lan

at K

abup

aten

/Kot

a le

vel.

・ R

DM

Ps

deve

lope

d at

Kab

/Kot

a in

SU

LU

T a

nd

NT

B w

ill c

ompl

emen

t the

BN

PB

pro

ject

that

ai

ms

at p

repa

ring

dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t pla

ns a

t al

l Kob

utat

en/K

ota

in I

ndon

esia

.

4) T

echn

ical

Gui

deli

ne f

or F

orm

ulat

ion

of S

OP

・

SO

P K

abup

aten

Kep

ulau

an S

itar

o fo

r F

acin

g D

isas

ter

Vol

cano

Kar

ange

tang

・

SO

P K

ota

Tom

ohon

・

SO

P K

ota

Bit

ung

1) P

erka

BN

PB

9-2

008

(SO

P fo

r th

e Q

uick

Res

pons

e Te

am)

2) P

erka

BN

PB

10-

2008

(G

uide

line

on

Dis

aste

r E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

Com

man

d)

3) P

erka

BN

PB

12-

2010

(G

uide

line

on

Em

erge

ncy

Rel

ief

Sup

port

Mec

hani

sm)

4) P

erka

BN

PB

13-

2010

(G

uide

line

on

Sea

rch,

Res

cue

& E

vacu

atio

n)

5) P

erka

BN

PB

14-

2010

(E

stab

lish

men

t of

Dis

aste

r E

mer

genc

y C

omm

and

Pos

t)

6) P

erka

BN

PB

18-

2010

(D

istr

ibut

ion

of L

ogis

tics

& E

quip

men

t)

7) P

erka

BN

PB

24-

2010

(F

orm

ulat

ion

of O

pera

tion

al P

lan

for

Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

e)

・C

urre

nt B

NP

B r

egul

atio

ns m

ay n

ot b

e co

mbi

ned

to b

e a

com

preh

ensi

ve d

ocum

ent.

Als

o, c

onte

nts

for

nati

onal

and

loca

l age

ncie

s ar

e m

ixed

.

・T

he te

chni

cal g

uide

line

del

inea

tes

thes

e co

nten

ts

and

focu

ses

on S

OP

at th

e K

abup

aten

/Kot

a le

vel.

Out

put 4

5)

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

for

Dis

aste

r R

elie

f E

xerc

ise

・T

TX

(Ta

ble

Top

Exe

rcis

e) a

nd C

PX

(C

omm

and

Pos

t E

xerc

ise)

man

ual

1) (

Dra

ft)

Per

ka B

NP

B ○

-201

2 (G

uide

line

for

Im

plem

enta

tion

of

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t E

xerc

ise)

→ s

till

und

er f

orm

ulat

ion

・T

he P

erka

is

stil

l a

draf

t an

d ha

s no

t be

en i

ssue

d as

of A

pril

201

5.

6) A

ctiv

itie

s fo

r “D

isas

ter

Res

ilie

nt V

illa

ge”

Pro

gram

– A

s a

Goo

d P

ract

ice

Mod

el –

(V

er.1

.0)

Mar

201

4 ・

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

n D

esa

Moy

ag

・D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

Kel

urah

an B

ebal

i

(・D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

Des

a K

uta)

1) P

erka

BN

PB

1-2

012

(Gen

eral

Gui

deli

ne o

n D

isas

ter

Res

ilie

nt V

illa

ge)

2) T

echn

ical

Gui

deli

ne f

or th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

of

Dis

aste

r R

esil

ient

Vil

lage

Pro

gram

201

2 (B

NP

B, 2

012)

3)

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

for

the

Impl

emen

tati

on o

f D

isas

ter

Res

ilie

nt V

illa

ge P

rogr

am 2

013

(BN

PB

, 201

3)

4) T

echn

ical

Gui

deli

ne f

or th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

of

Dis

aste

r R

esil

ient

Vil

lage

Pro

gram

201

4 (B

NP

B, 2

014)

5)

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

for

the

prep

arat

ion

of D

isas

ter

Ris

k A

sses

men

t at V

illa

ge L

evel

(B

NP

B, 2

013)

.

・ M

odul

e of

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Bas

ic T

rain

ing

(Mod

ule

for

Fac

ilit

ator

) w

as d

evel

oped

in 2

012

by B

NP

B a

nd A

IFD

R. D

evel

opm

ent o

f re

spec

tive

mod

ule

(e.g

. mod

ule

for

CB

DR

M

trai

ning

) ha

s si

nce

stal

led.

・ T

he g

ood

prac

tice

rep

ort i

s ex

pcte

d to

be

used

as

a re

fere

nce

to im

prov

e th

e ge

nera

l/te

chni

cal

guid

elin

e fo

r D

isas

ter

Res

ilie

nt V

illa

ge a

s w

ell

as th

e B

NP

B tr

aini

ng m

odul

e.

Not

e) T

he d

ocum

ents

wit

h un

derl

ine

(am

ong

proj

ect o

utpu

ts)

wil

l be

revi

sed/

upda

ted

upon

the

com

plet

ion

of a

ctiv

itie

s in

NT

B

A-29

Ap

pen

dix

12:

Eva

luat

ion

Gri

d b

ased

on

th

e 5

Cri

teri

a

1 A

pril

201

5

Eva

luat

ion

Cri

teri

aE

valu

atio

n Q

uest

ion

Info

rmat

ion

to b

e C

olle

cted

D

ata

sour

ce a

nd M

eans

1.

Rel

evan

ce

1.1

Dev

elop

men

ts o

f pol

icie

s/st

rate

gies

at t

he

nati

onal

or

loca

l lev

el a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith

disa

ster

man

agem

ent.

・P

rogr

ess

on th

e on

goin

g re

visi

on o

f th

e fo

llow

ing

docu

men

ts:

1) N

atio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

(201

5-20

19)

(dra

ft)

2) P

erka

No.

4/20

08 (

The

Gui

deli

ne f

or F

orm

ulat

ion

of D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan)

(dr

aft)

3)

Per

ka N

o. 2

/201

2 (G

ener

al G

uide

line

on

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Ass

essm

ent f

or D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent

Pla

nnin

g)

・A

re th

ere

any

new

dev

elop

men

t of

rele

vant

pol

icy

docu

men

ts o

n di

sast

er m

anag

emen

t ?

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・W

ebsi

te

・H

eari

ng w

ith

BA

PP

EN

AS

, Min

of

Hom

e A

ffai

rs, a

nd o

ther

rel

evan

t org

aniz

atio

ns

1.2

Ali

gnm

ent o

f th

e P

roje

ct w

ith

the

need

s an

d ex

pect

atio

n of

the

impl

emen

ting

or

gani

zati

ons.

・H

ow th

e P

roje

ct h

as h

elpe

d B

NP

B/B

PB

Ds

achi

eve

thei

r m

anda

tes?

・

Whi

ch P

rior

itie

s fo

r Act

ion

in H

FA h

as th

e P

roje

ct h

elpe

d pa

rtic

ular

ly?

1) N

atio

nal P

rogr

ess

Rep

ort o

n th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

of

the

HFA

(20

13-2

015)

2) L

ocal

Pro

gres

s R

epor

t on

the

Impl

emen

tati

on o

f H

FA, B

itun

g (2

013-

2014

)

3) L

ocal

Pro

gres

s R

epor

t on

the

Impl

emen

tati

on o

f H

FA, N

orth

Lom

bok

(201

3-20

14)

・

Are

BN

PB

/BP

BD

cou

nter

part

s co

nsid

erin

g pr

ojec

t act

ivit

ies

as a

par

t of

thei

r ow

n T

OR

?

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・

BP

BD

s (i

n pa

rtic

ular

, Bit

ung

and

Nor

th

Lom

bok)

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Rel

evan

t pol

icy

docu

men

ts, w

ebsi

te

1.3

App

ropr

iate

ness

of

the

sele

ctio

n of

pil

ot

site

s (e

.g. c

ases

of

rece

nt d

isas

ters

).

・1st

pil

ot p

rovi

nce:

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi P

rovi

nce

(SU

LU

T)

4 K

ota

(Man

ado,

Tom

ohon

, Bit

ung,

Kot

amob

agu)

11

Kab

upat

en: B

olaa

ng M

ongo

ndow

Bol

aang

Mon

gond

ow U

tara

(N

orth

)

Bol

aang

Mon

gond

ow S

elat

an (

Sou

th)

B

olaa

ng M

ondo

ndow

Tim

ur (

east

)

Min

ahas

a

Min

ahas

a U

tara

(N

orth

)

Min

ahas

a S

elat

an (

Sou

th)

Min

ahas

a Te

ngga

ra (

Sou

thea

st)

Kep

ulau

an S

itar

o

Kep

ulau

an S

angi

he

K

epul

auan

Tal

aud

・2nd

P p

ilot

pro

vinc

e: W

est N

usa

Teng

gara

(N

TB

) K

ota

Mat

aram

K

ab. L

ombo

k N

orth

K

ab. L

ombo

k W

est

L

ombo

k Is

land

K

ab. L

ombo

k C

entr

al

Kab

. Lom

bok

Eas

t K

ota

Bim

a K

ab. B

ima

Kab

. Dom

pu

S

umba

wa

Isla

nd

Kab

. Sum

baw

a

Kab

. Sum

baw

a W

est

・A

re th

ere

any

case

s of

rec

ent d

isas

ters

in th

e pi

lot s

ites

(e.

g. F

lood

in M

anad

o ci

ty in

Jan

201

4)?

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・B

PB

Ds

in S

UL

UT

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

BP

BD

s in

NT

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・E

xper

t int

ervi

ew a

nd P

rogr

ess

repo

rt

1) P

rovi

ncia

l/re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

BP

BD

s w

ith

unde

rlin

e on

the

left

col

umn

wil

l be

visi

ted

duri

ng th

e te

rmin

al e

valu

atio

n

2) A

ll B

PB

Ds

in N

TB

wil

l gat

her

at th

e W

/S

sche

dule

d on

14,

16,

and

eva

cuat

ion

dril

l on

18 A

pril

201

5.

1.4

Cha

nges

of

stru

ctur

e or

sta

ff o

f im

plem

enti

ng o

rgan

izat

ions

that

may

af

fect

the

Pro

ject

impl

emen

tati

on.

・Is

ther

e m

ajor

cha

nges

of

the

proj

ect i

mpl

emen

tati

on s

truc

ture

, inc

ludi

ng m

ain

coun

terp

art?

・

Did

the

chan

ge o

f P

roje

ct D

irec

tor

have

any

infl

uenc

e on

pro

ject

impl

emen

tati

on?

1) A

ug 2

013

(Mr.

Sug

eng →

Mr.

Dod

y)

2

) 16

Oct

201

4 (M

r. D

ody →

Mr.W

isnu

)

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

Pro

gres

s re

port

1.5

Pri

orit

y ar

eas

of th

e G

over

nmen

t of

Japa

n fo

r th

e de

velo

pmen

t coo

pera

tion

to

Indo

nesi

a.

・A

lign

men

t wit

h th

e D

evel

opm

ent C

oope

rati

on C

hart

er (

deci

ded

by th

e C

abin

et in

Feb

201

5) –

One

of

its

Pri

orit

y P

olic

ies

(Bui

ldin

g a

sust

aina

ble

and

resi

lien

t int

erna

tion

al c

omm

unit

y th

roug

h ef

fort

s to

add

ress

glo

bal c

hall

enge

s) c

once

rns

natu

ral d

isas

ter

and

its

risk

red

ucti

on.

・

Any

rec

ent u

pdat

e on

Jap

an’s

coo

pera

tion

pol

icy

for

Indo

nesi

a (A

pril

201

2)

・A

lign

men

t wit

h th

e S

enda

i Fra

mew

ork

for

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Red

ucti

on (

2015

-203

0) –

Its

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

e/go

al a

nd f

our

Pri

orit

ies

for

acti

on: 1

) U

nder

stan

ding

dis

aste

r ri

sk, 2

) St

reng

then

ing

disa

ster

ris

k go

vern

ance

, 3)

Inve

stin

g in

dis

aste

r ri

sk r

educ

tion

for

res

ilie

nce,

4)

Enh

anci

ng

disa

ster

ris

k pr

epar

edne

ss f

or e

ffec

tive

res

pons

e, a

nd to

“B

uild

Bac

k B

ette

r”

・D

ocum

ents

fro

m w

ebsi

te

・JI

CA

and

Jap

anes

e em

bass

y

A-30

2. E

ffec

tive

ness

2.1

Pro

gres

s of

Out

put 1

- T

he c

apac

ity

for

the

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y B

PB

Ds

to

accu

mul

ate

disa

ster

dat

a/in

form

atio

n w

hich

are

fun

dam

enta

l for

dis

aste

r ri

sk

man

agem

ent a

nd im

prov

e ac

cura

cy o

f suc

h da

ta/i

nfor

mat

ion

in th

e ta

rget

are

a is

en

hanc

ed.

The

leve

l of

achi

evem

ent a

nd a

ctiv

ity

prog

ress

is s

umm

ariz

ed in

the

Res

ult G

rid.

・

Pra

ctic

abil

ity

of T

echn

ical

gui

deli

ne f

or c

olle

ctin

g an

d st

orin

g di

sast

er d

ata/

info

rmat

ion

(ver

1.0)

S

ep 2

013

・T

he e

xten

t to

whi

ch a

ctua

l im

prov

emen

t of

disa

ster

dat

a qu

alit

y in

SU

LU

T.

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

(Pro

ject

Man

ager

3: H

ead

of D

ata,

In

form

atio

n an

d P

ubli

c R

elat

ion

Cen

ter)

・

BP

BD

s in

SU

LU

T in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・E

xper

t int

ervi

ew a

nd p

rogr

ess

repo

rt

2.2

Pro

gres

s of

Out

put 2

- T

he c

apac

ity

for

crea

tion

of

Haz

ard

and

risk

map

s at

re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

leve

l in

the

targ

et

area

is e

nhan

ced.

The

leve

l of

achi

evem

ent a

nd a

ctiv

ity

prog

ress

is s

umm

ariz

ed in

the

Res

ult G

rid.

・

Pra

ctic

abil

ity

of T

echn

ical

Gui

deli

ne f

or C

reat

ion

of H

azar

d M

ap f

or R

egen

cies

/Mun

icip

alit

ies

(Ver

. 2)

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith

Per

ka N

o.2/

2012

. ・

Doe

s B

PB

D s

taff

in S

UL

UT

uti

lize

the

hand

ed-o

ver

GIS

equ

ipm

ent (

and

upda

te h

azar

d/ri

sk m

aps)

on

thei

r ow

n?

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

(Pro

ject

Man

ager

1: D

irec

tor

of D

isas

ter

Ris

k R

educ

tion

) (P

roje

ct M

anag

er 3

: Hea

d of

Dat

a,

Info

rmat

ion

and

Pub

lic

Rel

atio

n C

ente

r)

・B

PB

D in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・E

xper

t int

ervi

ew a

nd p

rogr

ess

repo

rt

・G

IS s

uppo

rt te

am in

terv

iew

2.

3 P

rogr

ess

of O

utpu

t 3 -

The

cap

acit

y fo

r fo

rmul

atio

n of

Reg

iona

l dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t pla

ns f

or

rege

ncy/

mun

icip

alit

y in

the

targ

et a

rea

is

enha

nced

.

The

leve

l of

achi

evem

ent a

nd a

ctiv

ity

prog

ress

is s

umm

ariz

ed in

the

Res

ult G

rid.

・P

ract

icab

ilit

y of

the

Tech

nica

l Gui

deli

ne o

f R

egio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

for

Kab

upat

en/K

ota,

whi

ch c

an b

ecom

e an

Ann

ex to

the

Per

ka N

o.4/

2008

. ・

Pra

ctic

abil

ity

of th

e Te

chni

cal G

uide

line

for

For

mul

atio

n of

SO

P.

・L

ates

t sta

tus

of th

e si

gnin

g of

the

14 d

evel

oped

RD

MP

s in

SU

LU

T.

・D

evel

opm

ent/

revi

sion

sta

tus

of S

OP

s (K

abup

aten

Sit

aro,

Kot

a To

moh

o, K

otam

obag

u, a

nd B

itun

g).

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

(Pro

ject

Man

ager

1: D

irec

tor

of D

isas

ter

Ris

k R

educ

tion

) (P

roje

ct M

anag

er 2

: Dir

ecto

r fo

r P

repa

redn

ess)

(M

ain

coun

terp

art f

or th

e O

utpu

t 3)

・E

xper

t int

ervi

ew a

nd p

rogr

ess

repo

rt

・L

ocal

con

sult

ant i

nter

view

2.

4 P

rogr

ess

of O

utpu

t 4 -

The

cap

acit

y fo

r co

nduc

ting

Dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t ex

erci

ses

at th

e re

genc

y/m

unic

ipal

ity

in

the

targ

et a

rea

is e

nhan

ced.

The

leve

l of

achi

evem

ent a

nd a

ctiv

ity

prog

ress

is s

umm

ariz

ed in

the

Res

ult G

rid.

・P

ract

icab

ilit

y of

Tec

hnic

al G

uide

line

for

Dis

aste

r R

elie

f E

xerc

ise,

incl

udin

g T

TX

(Ta

ble

Top

Exe

rcis

e) a

nd C

PX

(C

omm

and

Pos

t Exe

rcis

e) m

anua

ls.

・

Whe

n th

e D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent D

rill

(C

PX

) w

as c

ondu

cted

vol

unta

rily

by

prov

inci

al a

nd B

itun

g B

PB

D a

nd h

ow w

as it

use

ful?

・H

ow M

anad

o B

PB

D b

ette

r re

spon

ded

wit

h pr

ojec

t exp

erie

nce

at th

e fl

ood

in F

eb 2

013

and

Jan

2014

? ・

Cur

rent

sta

tus

of C

BD

RM

act

ivit

ies

in th

e pi

lot v

illa

ges

S

UL

UT

1)

Des

a M

oyag

, Kot

a K

otam

obag

u

2

) K

elur

ahan

Beb

ali,

Kab

upat

en S

itar

o

NT

B

1)

Des

a K

uta,

Kab

upat

en L

ombo

k C

entr

al

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

(Pro

ject

Man

ager

2: D

irec

tor

for

Pre

pare

dnes

s)

(Pro

ject

Man

ager

4: D

irec

tor

for

Com

mun

ity

Em

pow

erm

ent)

・

Nor

th S

ulaw

esi a

nd B

itun

g B

PB

D

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Man

ado

BP

BD

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Reg

ency

/Mun

icip

al B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

・

Loc

al c

onsu

ltan

t int

ervi

ew

2.5

Pro

gres

s of

Out

put 5

- N

atio

nwid

e di

ssem

inat

ion

acti

viti

es a

re im

plem

ente

d.

The

leve

l of

achi

evem

ent a

nd a

ctiv

ity

prog

ress

is s

umm

ariz

ed in

the

Res

ult G

rid.

・W

hich

BN

PB

sec

tion

is m

ainl

y re

spon

sibl

e fo

r O

utpu

t 5?

・

How

Pro

ject

act

ivit

ies

are

diff

eren

t fro

m o

ther

RD

MP

s fo

rmul

atio

n ac

tivi

ties

(an

d ea

rthq

uake

ha

zard

map

) pr

omot

ed b

y B

NP

B it

self

?

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・E

xper

t int

ervi

ew a

nd p

rogr

ess

repo

rt

2.6

Pro

spec

t of

the

Pro

ject

Pur

pose

to b

e ac

hiev

ed b

y th

e en

d of

pro

ject

per

iod.

・

The

leve

l of

achi

evem

ent r

evie

wed

in li

ght o

f th

e P

roje

ct P

urpo

se/O

utpu

t ind

icat

ors.

・

Any

act

ual c

ases

of

dem

onst

rati

on/a

ppli

cati

on o

f en

hanc

ed c

apac

ity

of B

NP

B/B

PB

Ds

at o

ccas

ions

of

nat

ural

dis

aste

rs?

(e.g

. flo

od e

vent

s at

Man

ado

Cit

y on

17

Feb

201

3 an

d Ja

n 20

14)

・B

NP

B a

nd B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

2.7

Act

ions

take

n in

res

pons

e to

the

reco

mm

enda

tion

s m

ade

at th

e M

id-t

erm

re

view

.

1) R

emai

ning

act

ivit

ies

in S

UL

UT

・

Par

tici

pati

on o

f B

PB

Ds

to W

/S,

appr

oval

of

RD

MP

s by

loc

al a

utho

riti

es,

impl

emen

tati

on o

f R

DM

Ps,

Fol

low

-up

on a

ctiv

itie

s by

the

Pro

ject

2)

Im

plem

enta

tion

pol

icy

of th

e 2nd

hal

f of

the

Pro

ject

・St

reng

then

ing

capa

city

of

BN

PB

(an

d na

tion

al c

onsu

ltan

ts a

s w

ell a

s th

e A

ssis

tant

Tea

m)

3)

Mod

ific

atio

n of

the

PD

M (

addi

tion

of

Out

put 5

for

nat

ionw

ide

diss

emin

atio

n of

pro

ject

out

puts

) 4)

Col

labo

rati

on w

ith

rele

vant

age

ncie

s (e

.g. P

U, B

MK

G, B

PP

T, L

IPI

and

CV

GH

M)

・B

NP

B a

nd B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

A-31

3. E

ffic

ienc

y

3.1

Cla

rity

and

und

erst

andi

ng o

f th

e ov

eral

l pl

an o

f th

e P

roje

ct –

PD

M.

・R

/D w

as s

igne

d on

11

July

201

1

・R

evis

ion

of P

DM

at 4

th J

CC

(3

Apr

201

4)

1) c

hang

e of

the

2nd p

ilot

pro

vinc

e (B

ali →

NT

B)

2) A

ctiv

itie

s in

NT

B (

foc

usin

g on

Out

put 2

, Out

put 3

-1, O

utpu

t 4-2

)

3) A

ddit

ion

of O

utpu

t 5 (

nati

onw

ide

diss

emin

atio

n of

pro

ject

out

puts

suc

h as

the

Tech

nica

l G

uide

line

of

RD

MP

for

Kab

upat

en/K

ota,

and

tech

nica

l inp

uts

for

eart

hqua

ke h

azar

d m

aps)

・

Is th

e vi

ew o

n th

e le

vel o

f ac

hiev

emen

t of

the

Pro

ject

dis

crep

ant b

etw

een

expe

rt a

nd c

ount

erpa

rt?

・Is

ther

e an

y si

gnif

ican

t dif

fere

nce

betw

een

plan

of

oper

atio

n an

d ac

tual

impl

emen

tati

on?

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

3.2

Dis

patc

h of

Jap

anes

e ex

pert

s (a

ssig

nmen

t, ex

pert

ise,

num

ber

of e

xper

ts,

dura

tion

and

tim

ing)

.

・T

he p

roje

ct s

tart

ed o

n 22

Nov

embe

r 20

11 (

4 ye

ars)

・

Has

the

assi

gnm

ent o

f ex

pert

s (t

otal

18

expe

rts)

bee

n ap

prop

riat

e?

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

3.3

Pro

visi

on o

f eq

uipm

ent (

qual

ity

and

quan

tity

, tim

ing

of d

eliv

ery)

. ・

Is th

e L

ette

r of

Han

d-ov

er o

f th

e G

IS e

quip

men

t to

BP

BD

SU

LU

T a

vail

able

?

・

Wha

t is

the

mai

nten

ance

and

uti

liza

tion

sta

tus

of th

e ha

nded

-ove

r G

IS e

quip

men

t at B

PB

D

SU

LU

T?

・

Any

new

pro

cure

men

t of

equi

pmen

t for

NT

B?

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・B

PB

D S

UL

UT

inte

rvie

w

・B

PB

D N

TB

inte

rvie

w

・E

xper

t int

ervi

ew a

nd p

rogr

ess

repo

rt

3.4

Cou

nter

part

Tra

inin

g in

Jap

an

(sub

ject

/cur

ricu

lum

, dur

atio

n/ti

min

g,

sele

ctio

n of

trai

nees

).

・S

ubje

ct a

nd c

urri

culu

m

・D

urat

ion

and

tim

ing

1)

25

Aug

– 8

Sep

201

2, p

arti

cipa

ted

by B

NP

B a

nd S

UL

UT

cou

nter

part

2) 1

6-30

Aug

201

4, p

arti

cipa

ted

by B

NP

B, N

TB

cou

nter

part

s as

wel

l as

the

new

dir

ecto

r of

S

UL

UT

BP

BD

and

that

of

Bit

ung

BP

BD

for

sha

ring

of

expe

rien

ce)

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

3.5

Con

trib

utio

n of

cou

nter

part

per

sonn

el

(num

ber

of s

taff

, rol

e an

d re

spon

sibi

lity,

ti

me

and

effo

rt).

・ H

ow c

ompe

ting

dut

ies/

tim

e of

BN

PB

cou

nter

part

on

the

Pro

ject

bee

n re

solv

ed?

(The

ir a

tten

danc

e to

W/S

at p

ilot

pro

vinc

es is

incr

easi

ng. R

ecog

niti

on o

f B

NP

B o

n pr

ojec

t act

ivit

ies

is a

lso

incr

easi

ng b

ased

on

good

pra

ctic

es a

nd f

eedb

ack

from

SU

LU

T.)

・

Wha

t are

maj

or r

easo

ns o

f in

crea

sed

sens

e of

ow

ners

hip

on p

roje

ct a

ctiv

itie

s by

BP

BD

co

unte

rpar

t? (

Par

tici

pati

on a

nd w

illi

ngne

ss o

f N

TB

cou

nter

part

is h

ighe

r th

an th

ose

of S

UL

UT

co

unte

rpar

t.)

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・B

PB

Ds

in S

UL

UT

inte

rvie

w

・B

PB

Ds

in N

TB

inte

rvie

w

・E

xper

t int

ervi

ew a

nd p

rogr

ess

repo

rt

3.6

Cou

nter

-bud

get f

or th

e pr

ojec

t im

plem

enta

tion

(sh

are

of o

pera

tion

al

cost

s).

・H

ow B

PB

Ds

in N

TB

is b

ette

r m

anag

ing

nece

ssar

y ex

pens

es th

an B

PB

Ds

in S

UL

UT

? (C

ost-

shar

ing

of B

PB

Ds

to a

tten

d W

/S w

as in

dica

ted

as o

ne o

f co

nstr

aint

s in

the

Mid

-ter

m

revi

ew. T

he p

arti

cipa

tion

and

ach

ieve

men

t of

BPB

Ds,

how

ever

, was

hig

her

than

exp

ecte

d.)

・B

NP

B in

terv

iew

/que

stio

nnai

re

・B

PB

Ds

in S

UL

UT

inte

rvie

w

・B

PB

Ds

in N

TB

inte

rvie

w

・E

xper

t int

ervi

ew a

nd p

rogr

ess

repo

rt

3.7

Com

mun

icat

ion

(per

iodi

cal a

nd d

aily

) fo

r pr

ojec

t coo

rdin

atio

n be

twee

n im

plem

enti

ng o

rgan

izat

ions

and

the

Japa

nese

exp

erts

.

・JC

C m

eeti

ng: 1

st (

18 J

anua

ry 2

012)

, 2nd

(11

Jul

y 20

12),

3rd

(12

Sep

tem

ber

2013

), 4

th (

3 A

pr 2

014)

in

clud

ing

the

revi

sion

of

PD

M s

uch

as th

e 2nd

targ

et p

rovi

nce

of N

TB

・JI

CA

exp

erts

reg

ular

ly v

isit

BN

PB

whe

n th

ey a

rriv

e an

d le

ave

Indo

nesi

a to

ens

ure

good

co

mm

unic

atio

n.

・Is

the

com

mun

icat

ion

whe

n ex

pert

s do

n’t s

tay

in I

ndon

esia

goo

d en

ough

?

・N

umbe

r of

New

s L

ette

rs (

1st in

Feb

201

2, 2

nd in

Jul

201

2, 3

rd in

Mar

201

3, 4

th in

Jan

201

4, 5

th in

O

ct 2

014)

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

3.8

Com

mun

icat

ion

(per

iodi

cal a

nd d

aily

) fo

r pr

ojec

t coo

rdin

atio

n am

ong

Indo

nesi

an

orga

niza

tion

.

・In

vita

tion

lett

er a

nd r

epor

t of

mee

ting

s am

ong

BP

BD

s ha

s be

en s

uffi

cien

t?

・

Any

eff

ects

of

targ

etin

g al

l Kab

/Kot

a in

the

pilo

t pro

vinc

e (e

.g. I

t has

cau

sed

nota

ble

posi

tive

im

pact

s: e

.g. i

ncre

ased

com

mun

icat

ion,

info

rmat

ion

shar

ing

and

mut

ual l

earn

ing,

hea

lthy

co

mpe

titi

ve s

piri

t am

ong

BP

BD

sta

ff)

・Is

ther

e an

y ca

se o

f im

prov

ed c

omm

unic

atio

n du

e to

the

Pro

ject

(e.

g. I

n th

e pr

oces

s of

col

leti

ng

nece

ssar

y da

ta f

or r

isk

map

s an

d as

sess

men

t, th

e re

lati

ons

wit

h B

PB

D a

nd o

rgan

izat

ions

on

wea

ther

, pub

lic

wor

k, a

gric

ultu

re a

nd la

nd u

se h

as b

een

stre

ngth

ened

.)

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

3.9

Met

hods

and

con

tent

s of

tech

nolo

gy

tran

sfer

fro

m J

apan

ese

expe

rts

to

coun

terp

art p

erso

nnel

.

・O

n th

e jo

b tr

aini

ng a

nd le

arni

ng th

roug

h im

plem

enta

tion

pro

cess

es h

ave

been

eff

ecti

ve?

・

Are

ther

e an

y ad

diti

onal

trai

ning

opp

ortu

niti

es o

n D

RM

in I

ndon

esia

? ・

Adv

anta

ges

of te

chno

logy

in J

apan

(in

com

pari

son

wit

h th

ose

of th

ird

coun

trie

s) s

till

val

id?

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

3.10

Pro

mot

ing/

hind

erin

g fa

ctor

s th

at m

ay

have

aff

ecte

d th

e P

roje

ct

impl

emen

tati

on.

・A

ny c

ases

of

the

infl

uenc

e of

the

PDM

impo

rtan

t ass

umpt

ions

? ・

Are

ther

e no

tabl

e pr

omot

ing/

hind

erin

g fa

ctor

s?

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

A-32

Not

e) D

ocum

ents

wit

h un

derl

ine

are

alre

ady

coll

ecte

d.

4. I

mpa

ct

4.1

Pro

spec

t of

the

Ove

rall

Goa

l (ut

iliz

atio

n of

mat

eria

ls a

nd m

etho

dolo

gy b

y th

e P

roje

ct, a

nd th

ereb

y en

hanc

ing

BP

BD

s be

yond

the

targ

et a

reas

) to

be

achi

eved

3-

5 ye

ars

afte

r th

e pr

ojec

t end

.

・Is

the

Ove

rall

Goa

l is

stil

l app

ropr

iate

? ・

Wha

t is

curr

ent p

lans

/act

ivit

ies

tow

ards

ach

ievi

ng th

e O

vera

ll G

oal,

besi

des

the

poss

ible

inpu

ts o

n th

e fo

llow

ing

two

docu

men

ts?

1) N

atio

nal D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan

(201

5-20

19)

(dra

ft)

2) P

erka

No.

4/20

08 (

The

Gui

deli

ne f

or F

orm

ulat

ion

of D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

lan)

(dr

aft)

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

4.2

Met

hodo

logy

for

dis

sem

inat

ion

to o

ther

ar

eas.

・

How

the

Pro

ject

out

puts

is b

eing

inco

rpor

ated

into

the

BN

PB

’s o

wn

init

iati

ve? →

Out

put 5

1) R

DM

Ps

form

ulat

ion

acti

viti

es (

and

eart

hqua

ke h

azar

d m

ap)

prom

oted

by

BN

PB

itse

lf

2)

Dis

aste

r R

esil

ient

Vil

lage

Pro

gram

pro

mot

ed b

y B

NP

B it

self

?

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

4.3

Ong

oing

/pos

sibl

e co

llab

orat

ions

, if

any,

w

ith

mul

ti/b

i-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s (U

N, N

GO

, civ

il s

ocie

ty, a

nd p

riva

te

sect

or).

・A

ny s

yner

gy a

mon

g ot

her

Japa

nese

coo

pera

tion

sch

eme

(Pol

icy

Adv

isor

, JO

CV

, Aid

gra

nt f

or

gras

s-ro

ot g

roup

s)?

・A

ny in

form

atio

n sh

arin

g an

d co

llab

orat

ion

amon

g U

N a

genc

ies/

NG

O o

ngoi

ng?

1) U

ND

P (S

afer

Com

mun

ity

thro

ugh

Dis

aste

r R

isk

Red

ucti

on, f

inan

ced

by U

ND

P, A

usA

ID a

nd

DF

ID)

2)

Aus

AID

(A

ustr

alia

Ind

ones

ia F

acil

ity

for

Dis

aste

r R

educ

tion

) 3)

Wor

ld B

ank

4) G

IZ

5) F

renc

h G

over

nmen

t and

Fre

nch

Red

Cro

ss

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

4.4

Any

pos

itiv

e/ne

gati

ve im

pact

bro

ught

ab

out b

y th

e P

roje

ct (

Pol

icy

and

rese

arch

de

velo

pmen

t, P

over

ty r

educ

tion

, en

viro

nmen

tal p

rote

ctio

n, a

nd g

ende

r eq

uali

ty.)

・P

over

ty R

educ

tion

, Env

iron

men

tal p

rote

ctio

n, G

ende

r eq

uali

ty.

・

Any

par

ticu

lar

resp

onse

s/qu

erie

s en

sued

fro

m th

e pr

esen

tati

on b

y th

e P

roje

ct a

t the

Ann

ual B

NP

B

Gen

eral

Mee

ting

on

15 O

ct 2

014?

・

Any

oth

er r

elev

ant e

vent

s/pr

esen

tati

on in

Ind

ones

ia a

nd o

ther

cou

ntri

es?

1) J

oint

Sem

inar

on

Vol

cani

c A

ctiv

ity

and

Enh

ance

men

t of

Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Cap

acit

y in

N

orth

Sul

awes

i Pro

vinc

e (2

4 M

ay 2

013)

, org

aniz

ed b

y B

NP

B, N

orth

Sul

awes

i BP

BD

and

JI

CA

Pro

ject

Tea

m.

2)

Pre

sent

atio

n at

a J

ICA

sid

e ev

ent o

f Asi

a M

inis

teri

al C

onfe

renc

e on

DR

R (

23 J

une

2014

, T

hail

and)

3)

Pre

sent

atio

n at

the

UN

Wor

ld C

onfe

renc

e on

DR

R S

enda

i, Ja

pan

(14-

18 M

ar 2

015)

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

5. S

usta

inab

ilit

y 5.

1 P

rosp

ect f

rom

inst

itut

iona

l vie

wpo

int

(Pla

n of

org

aniz

atio

n, P

arti

cipa

tion

of

stak

ehol

ders

).

・Is

BN

PB

’s c

omm

itm

ent o

bser

ved

(ref

eren

ce in

doc

umen

t/pl

an, s

peec

h an

d re

mar

ks a

t m

eeti

ngs/

sem

inar

, act

ivit

ies

on th

eir

own

budg

et, e

tc.)

on

achi

evin

g/su

stai

ning

the

Pro

ject

P

urpo

se a

nd e

xten

d th

em to

war

ds th

e O

vera

ll G

oal?

・Is

ther

e an

y of

fici

al a

rran

gem

ent a

mon

g re

leva

nt o

rgan

izat

ions

to s

usta

in p

roje

ct a

ctiv

itie

s (e

.g.

MO

U a

mon

g or

gani

zati

ons,

TO

R f

or r

egul

ar m

eeti

ng, e

tc.)

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

5.2

Pro

spec

t fro

m te

chni

cal v

iew

poin

t (m

aint

enan

ce o

f eq

uipm

ent/

faci

liti

es,

man

agem

ent o

f m

ater

ials

/man

uals

, tr

aini

ng o

ppor

tuni

ties

).

・Is

the

owne

rshi

p of

all

the

docu

men

t pre

pare

d in

the

Pro

ject

cle

ar?

(Res

pons

ible

sec

tion

, man

agem

ent o

f or

igin

al f

ile,

bud

get t

o du

plic

ate

the

copy

, arr

ange

men

t of

coop

erat

ion

in c

ase

of r

evis

ion,

etc

.)

・T

he h

ande

d-ov

er G

IS e

quip

men

t at B

PB

D S

UL

UT

can

con

tinu

e to

be

util

ized

(in

clud

ing

poss

ibil

itie

s of

con

trac

ting

-out

to e

xter

nal e

ngin

eers

or

cons

igni

ng to

oth

er in

stit

utio

ns s

uch

as

BA

PP

ED

A a

nd u

nive

rsit

ies)

?

・

Any

add

itio

nal t

rain

ing

oppo

rtun

itie

s fo

r B

NP

B/B

PB

D s

taff

to r

efre

sh s

kill

s an

d kn

owle

dge?

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

5.3

Pro

spec

t fro

m H

uman

Res

ourc

e vi

ewpo

int (

poss

ibili

ty o

f st

aff

incr

ease

, co

llab

orat

ion

wit

h ot

her

orga

niza

tion

s).

・Is

con

tinu

ed a

ssig

nmen

t of

resp

onsi

ble

pers

ons

and

the

incr

ease

of

staf

f fo

rese

eabl

e?

1)

Num

ber

of B

NP

B s

taff

, inc

reas

e of

wor

kloa

d, p

lan

to m

ove

to a

new

bui

ldin

g

2)

Num

ber

of B

PB

D S

UL

UT

and

NT

B s

taff

, reg

ency

/mun

icip

al B

PB

Ds

・A

re th

ese

staf

f pe

rman

ent o

r te

mpo

rary

? ・

Dev

elop

men

t of

hum

an r

esou

rces

(co

unte

rpar

t) th

roug

h P

roje

ct a

ctiv

itie

s re

cogn

ized

?

・A

ny c

ase

of c

olla

bora

tion

wit

h ot

her

orga

niza

tion

s fo

r sh

arin

g w

ork

role

s/re

spon

sibi

liti

es?

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Exp

ert i

nter

view

and

pro

gres

s re

port

5.4

Pro

spec

t fro

m F

undi

ng v

iew

poin

t (B

udge

t all

ocat

ion

for

the

acti

viti

es,

Ext

erna

l fin

anci

ng f

rom

don

or/p

riva

te

sect

or).

・A

ctua

l yea

rly

budg

et a

lloc

atio

n of

BP

BD

s in

SU

LU

T a

nd N

TB

to im

plem

ent p

roje

ct a

ctiv

itie

s ・

Stat

us o

f th

e M

inis

try

of H

ome

Aff

airs

’ reg

ulat

ion,

whi

ch a

llow

s th

e lo

cal g

over

nmen

t to

use

1%

of it

s bu

dget

for

dis

aste

r ri

sk m

anag

emen

t

(B

NP

B d

oes

not h

ave

a hi

erar

chic

al a

utho

rity

ove

r B

PB

Ds

that

are

a p

art o

f lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts)

・P

ossi

bili

ty o

f ex

tern

al f

inan

cing

fro

m U

N a

genc

ies

or b

i-la

tera

l don

ors.

・B

NP

B, B

PB

Ds

inte

rvie

w/q

uest

ionn

aire

・

Min

istr

y of

Hom

e A

ffai

rs a

nd B

AP

PE

NA

S

hear

ing

・E

xper

t int

ervi

ew a

nd p

rogr

ess

repo

rt

A-33

A-34

A-35