Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The American Public Works Association - CEU Request Form
Organics Recycling: Going Beyond Yard Waste
Downloadable Program This program has been awarded 0.2 CEUs.
First Name: Middle Initial: Last Name:
APWA Membership Number: *Florida License Number (if applicable):
Job Title: Employer:
Address:
City: State/Province: Zip:
Email Address: (required)
Phone No. : Cell No.:
*IF you hold a PE License in Florida, and would like CEU credit - you MUST include your Middle Initial and Florida License Number on this form. APWA is an approved Florida Board of Professional Engineers training provider – 0003888.
You must attend the entire program and have your form signed by your Site Coordinator to be eligible for CEUs.
Where & when did you attend the Click, Listen & Learn program? MUST BE COMPLETED to receive CEU credit
Agency/Organization: Date:
Third Party Verification
Please have your Site Coordinator (the person who organized, setup and /or registered for the program) complete this section of
the form. If you are the Site Coordinator, please have your HR Department or Supervisor complete this section.
Signature: _______________________________ Printed Name: _______________________________ Date:_______
By signing this form, I acknowledge that the aforementioned person participated in this Click, Listen, & Learn in its entirety.
The American Public Works Association has been accredited as an Authorized Provider by the International
Association for Continuing Education and Training (IACET), 1760 Old Meadow Road, Suite 500, McLean, VA 22102;
(703) 506-3275.
*CEU requirements for water/waste water operators vary from state to state. Before you send in your CEU
application, check with your state certifying agency to see if CEUs from APWA will be accepted.
If you have a current APWA Membership, there is no charge for CEU registration.
If you are NOT currently an APWA Member, the cost of CEU registration is $7 USD.
Please see the second page of this form for more information on enhanced membership benefits.
To receive CEU credit, simply complete and submit this form via mail or fax (below). You will be notified via email when your CEU
Transcript is processed and available for secure download via APWA’s web site at http://www.apwa.net/Education/CEU.
Please direct CEU questions to Heather DelaCruz at (800) 848-2792 or [email protected].
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NON-MEMBERS ONLY: Please complete this section and submit with payment ($7 USD). Name on Card: Authorized Cardholder Signature:
__ __ __ __-__ __ __ __-__ __ __ __ -__ __ __ __ Exp Date: __ __/20__ __ (VISA or MasterCard) (mo.) (yr.)
__ __ __ __-__ __ __ __-__ __ __ __ -__ __ __ Exp Date: __ __/20__ __ (American Express) (mo.) (yr.)
Submit completed form to:
APWA, Attn: Heather DelaCruz, 2345 Grand Ave, Ste 700, Kansas City, MO 64118 - or - Fax: (816) 595-5315
□ Check Box
for Receipt
American Public Works Association presents…
Organics Recycling: Going Beyond Yard Waste
Thursday, November 18th, 2010 11:00 am EST/ 10:00 am CST/ 9:00 am MST/ 8:00 am PST
SPEAKERS: Mitch Kessler President Kessler Consulting, Inc. Tampa, Florida Pat Parker Director of Support Services Operations & Waste Management Division City of Hamilton Ontario, Canada Paul Schultz City of Dubuque Resource Management Coordinator Dubuque, Iowa MODERATOR: Jeff Turner Senior Professional Associate HDR Kansas City, Missouri
Organics Recycling: Going Beyond Yard Waste Thursday, November 18th, 2010 Speaker Bios Mitch Kessler President Kessler Consulting, Inc. Tampa, Florida Mitch Kessler, President of Kessler Consulting, Inc. has more than 25 years in the solid waste industry and has been responsible for over 200 projects pertaining to comprehensive waste management, collection, recycling, and composting programs for municipalities, institutions, and private corporations. Mitch served on the Florida DEP’s Compost Rule Change Technical Advisory Committee and was the founding Chair of the Florida Organics Recyclers Association. Mitch’s firm currently manages and has overseen FORCE, the Florida Organics Recycling Center for Excellence, since its inception 10 years ago. Mr. Kessler has been a long-standing member of the United States Composting Council and is the current Vice President of Solid Waste Association of North America’s (SWANA) Florida Sunshine Chapter. He is a certified SWANA instructor for both Manager of Recycling Systems and Composting Systems Manager certification courses. Kessler Consulting, Inc. has been providing solid waste consulting services to over 100 government and private sector clients for 22 years. The firm has expertise in the areas of solid waste master planning, waste collection, disposal and processing, commercial and residential waste reduction and recycling program evaluations and implementation, and waste composition and generation studies. Pat Parker Director of Support Services Operations & Waste Management Division City of Hamilton Ontario, Canada Pat Parker was appointed as the Director of Support Services in the Operations & Waste Management Division for the City of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada in a Public Works Department reorganization in 2009. In this role, her group provides planning and programing services, customer service and community outreach, cemeteries administration, data management, health and safety and administrative services to a broad range of operating groups including cemeteries, forestry, horticulture, parks, roads and maintenance and waste management.
Before 2009, Pat was the Manager of Solid Waste Planning in the Waste Management Division for the City of Hamilton managing the activities of the Community Outreach and Policy and Planning groups. The Community Outreach group was responsible for developing, producing and delivering promotional and educational services and material on waste diversion programs. The Policy and Planning group planned, developed and implemented new programs and program improvements for waste management. Some of these programs included the preparation of a new draft Waste Management By-law, the implementation of the Green Cart program, a public space recycling program and the initiation of the City’s Environment Days. Pat has been involved in the process of awarding the contracts to design, construct and operate a new Materials Recycling Facility and Central Composting Facility and the Niagara-Hamilton WastePlan project for long term disposal options following Ontario’s Environmental Assessment process. Prior to joining the Waste Management Division in 2001, Pat was employed in the Planning Department of the former Town of Flamborough in several positions including Manager of Community Planning, for a total of thirteen years. Before that she was in the private planning consulting business for fourteen years. Pat is a graduate of the Community Planning course at Mohawk College of Applied Arts and Technology, and is a member of the Canadian Institute of Planners and the Ontario Professional Planners Institute. Paul Schultz City of Dubuque Resource Management Coordinator Dubuque, Iowa Paul Schultz works for the City of Dubuque Iowa (60,000 citizens) and recently became its Resource Management Coordinator. He initiated the City of Dubuque’s Environmental Stewardship Advisory Commission, Pay As You Throw program and composed the initial draft of its sustainability principles, Green Vision - Schools program and Green Asset Map. In 2006 he launched the first phase of its food scrap curbside co-collection and composting program. He directed the development of the 2009 DMASWA Landfill Diversion Roadmap designed to achieve a 50% per capita diversion from current landfilling to beneficial use. For 18 years he was an organic fruit farmer, small scale food processor, produce aggregator/distributor and on-farm composter. He moved to Dubuque and became the General Manager for the Environmental Recycling Corporation before joining the City of Dubuque in 1995 to manage its solid waste collection and beneficiation programs. MODERATOR: Jeff Turner Senior Professional Associate HDR Kansas City, Missouri
Mr. Turner received a Bachelor of Science degree in Biology from Peru State College in Nebraska, and a Master of Science degree in Geography from the University of Nebraska. He was a Research Associate at the University of Nebraska at Omaha using satellite data to conduct large-area natural resource inventories before joining HDR in 1980. Mr. Turner began working in solid waste management consulting in 1983 and has worked on over 100 projects in 40 states and Puerto Rico, and has advised more than 60 city and county governments and private companies on solid waste management issues and policies. He was a previous member of the State of Minnesota Solid Waste Management Advisory Council and is a current member of the State of Missouri Solid Waste Advisory Board. Mr. Turner is experienced in many areas of solid waste management including recycling, MSW composting, source-segregated organics composting, energy from waste, transfer stations, and materials recovery facilities. His specific solid waste experience includes: feasibility analysis, system definition, facility siting, facility and system life-cycle cost analysis and alternatives analysis, vendor technology evaluation, procurement and contract negotiations, tipping fee analyses, and solid waste policy issues analyses. Mr. Turner has been responsible for conducting technology evaluations of MSW composting and RDF processing equipment including aerated static pile, aerated windrow, agitated beds, in-vessel rotating drum systems, as well as various shredding and screening technologies. He has conducted numerous in-plant operations and management reviews and has been involved in the implementation of over 12 energy from waste, composting, materials recovery, and recycling facilities. Mr. Turner currently leads the environmental conservation and planning practice in Missouri and Kansas and is located in Kansas City, Missouri.
11/11/2010
1
Thursday, November 18Thursday, November 18thth, 2010, 201011:00 am EST 10:00 am CST 9:00 am MST 8:00 am PST11:00 am EST 10:00 am CST 9:00 am MST 8:00 am PST
APWA Education Calendar• December 2nd: Using Social Media to Deliver Your Public
Works Message
• December 7th:
• December 16th:
• December 21st:
o s essage
REBROADCAST: How to Write a Sustainability Action Plan
ADA – Project Civic Access - It may be headed your way...
REBROADCAST - Lessons Learned From ece be
• January 4th:
O C S esso s ea ed oExtreme Weather Events
REBROADCAST - Where To Get Them and How To Use Them
Visit www.apwa.net/Education for more Education Opportunities
11/11/2010
5
Today’s Moderator…
Jeff TurnerSenior Professional Associate
HDRKansas City, Missouri
Polling QuestionPolling Question
How many people are listening at o r site toda ?at your site today?
a) 1b) 2-3c) 4-7d) 8-20 – all one agencyd) 8-20 – all one agencye) 8-20 – multiple agenciesf) 21+
11/11/2010
6
Today’s Speakers…
Mitch KesslerPresident
Kessler Consulting, Inc.Tampa, Florida
Paul SchultzCity of Dubuque
Resource Management CoordinatorDubuque, Iowa
Pat ParkerDirector of Support Services
Operations & Waste Management DivisionCity of HamiltonOntario, Canada
Mitch KesslerPresident
Kessler Consulting, Inc.Tampa, Florida
11/11/2010
7
The Organics RevolutionThe Organics Revolution
Mitch KesslerKessler Consulting, Inc.
American Public Works AssociationOrganics Recycling Webinar
November 18, 2010
"Accept that some days you're the pigeon and some days you're the statue.“
- - Roger C. Anderson
11/11/2010
8
Organics Generation• Organics is the largest
component ofRubber, Leather, and
Textiles, 7.9%Other , 3.3%
component of generated MSW1. Yard waste – 32.9 million
tons2. Food waste – 31.8
million tons3. Wood – 16.4 million tons4. Non-recyclable paper –
Paper , 18.9%
Non-Recyclable Paper, 12.1%Metals, 8.4%
Plastics, 12.0%
y p p9.4 million tons
• Targeting organics is the key to reaching high recovery rates
Source: EPA MSW in the U.S., 2008
Yard Waste, 13.2%
Food Waste, 12.7%
Wood, 6.6%
Glass, 4.9%
Recovery of Organics
25,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
Thou
sand
s of
Ton
s
Yard Waste, 64.7%Food Waste, 2.5%Wood, 9.6%Non-Recyclable Paper, 0%
Source: EPA MSW in the U.S., 2008
0
5,000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2003 2005 2007 2008
11/11/2010
9
Organics Discarded in MSW35,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Thou
sand
s of
Ton
s
Yard WasteFood Waste WoodNon-Recyclable Paper
Source: EPA MSW in the U.S., 2008
-
5,000
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2003
2005
2007
2008
Organic Diversity
Process ProductFeedstock ProcessSize ReductionCompostFill MaterialFeedstock
ProductMulchFertilizer / CompostSoil AmendmentOrganic IngredientEnergy Recovery
FeedstockYard WasteFood WasteBiosolidsAnimal ManureMunicipal Solid WasteWasteIndustry Waste
11/11/2010
10
Balancing Organics
COLLECTION PROCESSING MARKETSCOLLECTION PROCESSING MARKETS
$ $ $
Organics Recovery Programs© Kessler Consulting, Inc.
Benefits of Organics Composting
• Potential of diverting large titi f th t tquantities of the waste stream
from disposal• Organics recovery is needed to
meet high-performing state recycling goalsrecycling goals
• Food and yard waste provide necessary nitrogen and carbon balance
11/11/2010
11
Elements of an Organics Recycling Program
• Integration into the existing infrastructureteg at o to t e e st g ast uctu e• Program plan• Cost and benefits• Education and training• Identifying potential vendors or sitesIdentifying potential vendors or sites• Public/private ownership/operation• Identify feedstock sources and end-
markets
Systems / Technologies
FO
RC
E
FO
RC
E
Windrow Composting Bunker System
RC
E
stin
g
In-Vessel Digester Gortex Cover
FO
R
Ced
ar G
rove
Com
pos
11/11/2010
12
Equipment
Grinding equipmentFront-end loader
Turning equipment Screening equipment
Sources and End-Markets
Sources of Organic Wastes Potential End-Markets• Commercial / Institutional:
– Grocery stores, schools, restaurants, hospitals, prisons
– Commercial food processors• Residential:
– Backyard compostingCurbside pickup
• Horticultural, nursery, and agricultural industry
• State transportation departments
• Golf courses• Soil and sod industry (soil
amendment)– Curbside pickup )
11/11/2010
13
Organics Recycling Barriers / Obstacles
• TechnicalS t d ll ti• Segregated collection
• Operational knowledge• Designated facility
• Regulation Barriers• Permitting / registration requirements• Classification of compost types• Environmental implications (odor and health safety)
• Economic and Market• Low disposal fees• Capital and operating costs• End-market development
Next Steps
• Modify state compost rules– Create uniform standards– Tiered approach
• Yard waste bans
• Increase organics recovery of food g ywaste, non-recyclable paper, and biosolids
• Produce higher-value material
11/11/2010
14
Next Steps Continued
• Demonstrate benefits to k tmarkets
• Educate and communicate
• Incorporate organics recovery into solid waste master planning
Additional Resources• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
www epa govwww.epa.gov
• United States Composting Council (USCC)www.compostingcouncil.org
• State recycling and/or composting associationsassociations
• Florida Organics Recycling Center for Excellence (FORCE) www.floridaforce.org
11/11/2010
15
Remember…There is no one
path to high-f
Mitch KesslerPresident
performance recycling
PresidentKessler Consulting, Inc.
Q & AQ & AType your questions into the chat pod on the
left side of the screen and hit send
11/11/2010
16
Pat ParkerDirector of Support Services
Operations & Waste Management DivisionCity of HamiltonOntario, Canada
G CGreen Cart Program: Hamilton’s Experience with Household Organics
APWA WebinarNovember 18, 2010
Pat Parker, Director of Support ServicesOperations & Waste Management Division
Providing services that bring our City to life!
32
11/11/2010
17
33
OVERVIEW
• Background• Organics Program Overview• Promotion & Education Strategies• Promotion & Education Strategies• How did we make it happen?• Results & Lessons Learned
Green Bin Program Roll Out: Hamilton’s Experience
34
BACKGROUND
Green Bin Program Roll Out: Hamilton’s Experience
11/11/2010
18
35
• Mix of Urban, Suburban, and Rural
• Population: 526,000
Background
Demographics
p ,• Six Waste Collection Zones
– Public/Private waste collection service providers
• Our Customers– Single Family Properties– Multi-Residential Properties– Commercial properties &
Special Policy Areas
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
Special Policy Areas– Schools– Municipal facilities
• Waste Managed: 245,000 tonnes (2009)
• 42% overall diversion, 47% residential diversion (2009)
36
Why Composting?
Extending Landfill Capacity
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
11/11/2010
19
37
• Landfill is a valuable resource• 65% diversion from landfill
Integrated Waste Management System
Solid Waste Management Master Plan
• 3-stream system (recyclables, organics, garbage)• Central Composting Facility• Plan developed by the community
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
38
ORGANICS PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
11/11/2010
20
39
• Source separated organics collection program from ~198,000 units (single family, multi-family
Organics Program Overview
Green Cart Program
and some businesses)• Includes kitchen waste, soiled paper products and
leaf & yard (L&Y) waste• Weekly collection in Green Carts and up to 2
additional L&Y bags / containers (curbside)• Complete ban on plastic, compostable liner bags
added in 2008
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
• Separate L&Y waste collection and composting facility
• Co-collection with garbage using cart tippers• Central Composting Facility
40
• Cart-based system120L wheeled carts (1:15 ratio)
Organics Program OverviewMulti-Residential Organics
– 120L wheeled carts (1:15 ratio)– Utilized existing single-family program infrastructure
• Strong Outreach Component– All buildings visited by staff (students)– Lobby open houses offered to all medium/large buildings– Superintendent/Property Owner Open Houses
• Focus on Improved Recycling and Organics
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
p y g g• Phased Distribution
– Small curbside-serviced properties– Medium/large curbside-serviced properties– Bin-serviced properties
11/11/2010
21
41
Organics Program OverviewMulti-Residential Organics
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
42
CENTRAL COMPOSTING FACILITY (CCF)
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
11/11/2010
22
43
• State-of-the-art in vessel composting facility• Fully operational June 2006
Central Composting Facility (CCF)
Facility Overview
y p• Capacity of 60,000 tonnes/year of source
separated organic waste• Aerated static pile aerobic composting process in
three stages• 16,935 m2 (182,287 ft2) total facility size• Produces high quality compost that is sold to
markets
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
markets• Key facility in the City’s integrated waste
management system• Construction cost - $33.1 million
44
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
Central Composting Facility Aerial View
11/11/2010
23
PROMOTION & EDUCATION STRATEGIES
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
46
Promotion & Education Strategies
• Background Research• Identification of stakeholders
Communication Planning
• Key Recommendations– Focus– Public Relations– Advertising– City Employees– Community– Reward and Recognize
• Extending communication dollars
Green Bin Program Roll Out: Hamilton’s Experience
g
11/11/2010
24
47
Promotion & Education Strategies
• Waste Collection Calendar• Program Introductory Package
Green Cart Campaign Elements
g y g• Green Cart Distribution & PR• Newspaper Advertising• Television Advertising• Oops! Sticker• Seasonal Prompts• Web Site
Green Bin Program Roll Out: Hamilton’s Experience
• CCF Grand Opening• Customization for multi-
residential roll-out
48
Promotion & Education Strategies
• Social Marketing• Pre-communications• Distribution related
Campaign Phases
• Distribution-related• Troubleshooting (barrier-related)• Communication elements
– Information package (booklet, magnet, mini-bin sticker, mini-bin liner)
– Outreach/Public Relations Officers during distribution– TV (4 themes: odours, pests, cleaning, storage)– Building Superintendents
Customer service & staff as ambassadors
Green Bin Program Roll Out: Hamilton’s Experience
– Customer service & staff as ambassadors
11/11/2010
25
HOW DID WE MAKE IT HAPPEN?
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
2001 • Council Approval of Master Plan
2002 C ll ti D t ti B i
How Did We Make it Happen?Planning & Development
2002 • Collection Demonstration Begins• Facility Site Selection Process Begins
2003 • Collection Demonstration Expands• Composting Facility RFP Process Begins
2004 • Composting Site Selected• Award of CCF Design-Build-Operate Contract
Appro al of Collection S stem
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
• Approval of Collection System
2005 • CCF Construction Starts• Issue & Award of Tenders & RFPs for
Collection Contract, Trucks, Carts & Communication Materials
11/11/2010
26
March • Communications Launched (calendars, count d di t )
How Did We Make it Happen?Program Roll Out - 2006
down media events)
April • Cart Distribution Started• CCF Commissioning
May • Cart Distribution Continues• CCF Commissioning Completed
June • CCF Fully OperationalCCF G d O i E t
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
• CCF Grand Opening Event• Cart Distribution Completed
2007 • Multi-res green cart roll out implementation l d l d d d b C il
How Did We Make it Happen?Program Evolution
plan developed and approved by Council• Council approves three year phase-in to a
one container limit for garbage
2008 • Compostable liner bags accepted• 578 multi-res buildings on green cart program
2009 • One + One Program implemented in April (One bag of waste plus one clear bag)
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
( g p g)• 916 multi-res buildings on green cart program
2010 • Implementation of one container limit April 5th
• Completion of Multi-res green cart program roll out
11/11/2010
27
53
• Compost Production• Low Contamination Rate – Due to public education,
ResultsProgram Successes
Low Contamination Rate Due to public education, curbside enforcement and awareness and a plastic free program
• Marketing Excess Capacity• Provincial and Federal Funding• Communication Strategy• Building by building approach for multi-residential
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
54
ResultsOrganics - By The Numbers
Description 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Tonnes to CCF
n/a 24,000 28,500 33,800 36,200
# of curbside stops
0 155,600 154,000 155,000 157,800
# of multi-residential buildings
0 0 148 578 916
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
served# of multi-residential units served
0 0 1,149 8,292 39,325
11/11/2010
28
55
ResultsOrganics - Participation & Capture
Description Single Family
Multi FamilyFamily
Participation Rate 70% 91% (building)
Capture Rate 52% 20-30%
kg/hh/week of waste 13.7 11.0
kg/hh/week of organics 4.1 3.5
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
g g
LESSONS LEARNED
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
11/11/2010
29
Lessons Learned
• Demonstration projects• Think like a resident• Design-Build-Operate for new technology• Staging program launch to enable facility
commissioning• Focus on compost quality• Plan for contingencies and be flexible• Communicate, communicate, communicate• Continuous Improvement• Stay cool & have fun
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
• Stay cool & have fun
11/11/2010
30
59
A Strange New Thing
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s ExperienceHamilton Spectator – November 20, 2007
60
Thank You
Green Bin Program Rollout: Hamilton’s Experience
City of HamiltonPublic Works Department
905-546-CITY (2489)www.hamilton.ca/waste
11/11/2010
31
Q & AQ & AType your questions into the chat pod on the
left side of the screen and hit send
5 Mi t B k5 Minute BreakDo you have questions for our speakers?
Please type your questions into the chat pod on the left side of the screen and hit send
11/11/2010
32
Program will resumeProgram will resume momentarily
11/11/2010
33
Paul SchultzCity of Dubuque
Resource Management CoordinatorDubuque, Iowa
Dubuque Food Scraps:Co‐Collection for Co‐Composting and Beyond
Paul F. SchultzResource Management Coordinator
City of Dubuque, Iowa
11/11/2010
34
Outline:
1. Why Dubuque?
2 Goals2. Goals
3. Design
4. Acceptable / Unacceptable Materials
5. Diversion and Participation
6. Program Costs/Revenues6. Program Costs/Revenues
7. Issues Driving Program Changes
Dubuque is a viable, livable, and equitable community. We embrace economic prosperity,
/social/cultural vibrancy and environmental integrity to create a sustainable legacy for generations to come.
11/11/2010
35
City of DubuqueFY10 Collection Facts
• 59,000 2010 population estimate
• 21,000 Customers $10.60/mo: trash/recycling fee
• Refuse: 10,615 Tons
• Curbside Recycling: 4,290 Tons
• Yard Debris 1,196 Tons
• Food Residuals 75 tons
Currently: 40% Diversion Away from Landfillingincluding source reduction & backyard composting
Source‐Separated Organics
Targeting food scraps for diversion helps improve citizen understanding that composting can be the preferred method of waste minimization and pollution prevention for many materials.
It is not “waste” until it is wastedIt is not waste until it is wasted.
Wasting is the abuse of a stranded asset.
Waste is a verb, not a noun.
11/11/2010
36
Great Diversion Potential
According to the JuneAccording to the June 2010 DMASWA Waste Sort, almost 30 % of the current materials, set out as refuse, from the average Dubuqueaverage Dubuque household could be processed into compost
(3,000 tons per year).
Data from Residential Waste Assessments
DMASWA IDNRDMASWA IDNR
June 2010 October 2005
• Food Residuals Landfilled
18.4% City of Dubuque 11.2% Iowa Statewide
• Compostable Paper Landfilled
10.9% City of Dubuque 7.9% Iowa Statewide
11/11/2010
37
Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) Co‐Composting Rules
An small opportunity in regulations
for yard waste composting sites
currently allows
up to 2 tons of food scraps per week
to be accepted for co‐composting.
DMASWA and the City of Dubuque were the first organizations to take advantage of the option in 2006.
Food Scrap Recycling Goals (1):
1. Supply more raw feedstock materials for our locally produced high demand compost to improve local soils, infiltrate stormwater and reduce erosion
2. Achieve Iowa’s 50% solid waste diversion goal
3. Maintain Dubuque’s status as a Clean Air Attainment community reducing ozone and particulates to protect h h lth d bl i ihuman health and enable economic expansion
4. Reduce fugitive landfill methane emissions to help achieve Green House Gas reduction targets. The methane produced is 23 to 72 times more potent than CO2. Most landfill food scrap decomposition occurs before landfill cells are capped
11/11/2010
38
Dubuque Governmental OperationsCarbon Footprint: 2007
86,080 tonnes CO2e
Food Scrap Recycling Goals (2):
5. Conserve valuable local landfill capacity by diverting some of 5. Conserve valuable local landfill capacity by diverting some ofthe targeted 2,000 TPY (2%) to new beneficial uses
6. Progressively expand composting capacity to allow development of effective business plans to capture, process and market these local “stranded assets”
7. Expand sustainability practices with citizens and businesses to help Dubuque become a smarter more resilient communityhelp Dubuque become a smarter, more resilient community
8. Demonstrate transferability in collection and processing of food scraps for potential application in other communities under 200,000
11/11/2010
39
Design: Pilot Phase to Current Model
On April 3, 2006, the City of Dubuque implemented an initial two‐year pilot project on collection of food scraps for beneficial use through composting.
Residential and a few institutional and business customers were targeted to voluntarily divert their source‐separated organics for co‐compostingwith yard debris.
Co‐collectionwith yard debris was initially seasonal: April through November.
Food Scraps with Yard Debris
11/11/2010
40
Residential Containers
Two‐gallon “Kitchen Catchers” ghold small accumulations before transfer to the GreenCart
Households set out materials in subscribed 13‐gallon, food scrap carts with snap‐lock lids
40 pound weight limit 40 pound weight limit.
Plastic bags are never allowed
Bio‐plastic and PLA bags are currently not allowed
Commercial Containers
Business and institutional customers are supplied with either 48‐gal or 64‐galtipper carts for hydraulic lifting
11/11/2010
41
DMASWA Waste Minimization Fund
The carts were purchased with a p50% cost share from the Waste Minimization Fund of the Dubuque Metropolitan Area Solid Waste Agency (DMASWA)
Education and promotion were funded at 100%
11/11/2010
42
Insect and Odor Controls
Wash‐out containers as needed
Paper grocery bags, paper liners and paper wrapped food scraps can be used inside carts to reduce / eliminate insects liquids and odorsinsects, liquids, and odors
Some subscribers also use dried leaves or compost to create an insect barrier layer and as a carbon filter for odor control
Good Neighbor Policy
Failure to use, store and set out properly would lead to enforcement and cancellationwould lead to enforcement and cancellation of the subscription and seizure of the City‐owned cart.
Initially subscribed customers were requested to set out weekly to reduce odors and potential neighbor nuisance concerns.
No complaints of any type have been received from anyone.
11/11/2010
43
Customer Satisfaction Survey
No smelly kitchen trash‐can in the houseNo smelly kitchen trash can in the house
Supervise kids fewer chores to “take out the trash”
Tight animal‐proof container
Purchased fewer plastic garbage bags
Saved on some disposal fees by including yard debris
Feel good about adding this sustainable practice Feel good about adding this sustainable practice
A responsible step for generating compost
An effective action to reduce global warming impact
Acceptable Food Scraps
• Baked goods and dough • Herbs and spices
• Bread, toast
• Butter and margarine
• Cake, cookies and candy
• Cereal and oatmeal
• Cheese and dairy products
• Coffee filters and grounds
• Corncobs and husks
• Jams and jelly
• Mustard and mayonnaise
• Meat, bones and meat products
• Muffins and muffin papers
• Nuts and nutshells
• Pasta and pizza
• Peanut butter
Pl i• Eggs and eggshells
• Fish and fish parts, shellfish
• Fruits and vegetables
• Flour, grains and rice
• Gravy and sauces
• Grease, lards and fats
• Plate scrapings
• Popcorn
• Salads and salad dressing
• Sour cream and yogurt
• Sugar and syrup
• Tea bags
11/11/2010
44
Acceptable Paper, etc.
• Greasy pizza boxes • Cut flowersy p
• Microwave popcorn bags
• Paper plates and cups
• Paper take‐out trays
• Paper towels and napkins
• Facial tissues
• Popsicle sticks
• Houseplants (soil ok but no pots)
• Grass
• Leaves
• Trimmings
• Small landscape prunings• Popsicle sticks
• Toothpicks
p p g
• Culled garden produce
• Weeds (not noxious)
• Sod
Unacceptable Material
• Animal waste and bedding, • Medical wasteg,including droppings and litter
• Cigarette butts and ashes
• Dead animals
• Diapers
• Disposable mop sheets
• Plastic films, straws, bags, tubs and lids
• Textiles, clothing, shoes
• Wood and treated wood
• Vacuum bags/dust
• Waxed paper and waxed • Feminine hygiene products
• Hair, pet fur, feathers
• Hazardous waste
p pcardboard
• Wood ashes (cold)
• Wood chips and sawdust
• Wine corks
11/11/2010
45
Residential Performance
Ab t 50% kl t t t About a 50% weekly setout rate
230 main season subscribers
75 intermittent subscribers and call‐in users (Nov‐Mar)
Subscribing households set out an average of 7 pounds g g pper week
Since inception approximately 280,000 pounds were collected and composted from residential subscribers
2010 School Diversion
School facilities set out an Marshall (E) 2,030 lbsSchool facilities set out an average of 200 pounds per week when in session ‐most exclude winter setouts
Currently, nine elementary schools, one middle school, one high school and four
( ) ,
Fulton (E) 3,000 lbs
Kennedy (E) 4,330 lbs
Lincoln (E) 1,100 lbs
Table Mound (E) 700 lbs
Resurrection (E) 5,400 lbs
St. Columbkille (E) 2,435 lbsone high school, and four colleges
Since 1/1/10 approximately 34,685 pounds have been composted
Mazzuchelli (M) 4,900 lbs
Wartburg Seminary 2,605 lbs
Loras College 5,050 lbs
Clarke University 3,290 lbs
11/11/2010
46
2010 Commercial Diversion
Commercial customers, so Fast Food Restaurant 950 lbsCommercial customers, so far without grocery stores, set out an average of 355 pounds per week
Collection limited to once per week and normally 2 tipper carts per customer
Religious Motherhouse 13,465 lbs
Small Supper Club 945 lbs
Landscaper / Nursery 30 lbs
Architectural Firm 225 lbs
Church w/ Day Care 4,890 lbs
Governmental Agency 275 lbstipper carts per customer
Since 1/1/10 approximately 22,750 pounds have been composted from eight “commercial” subscribers
Dental Clinic 370 lbs
2006‐2010 Event Diversion
“Zero Waste” events have City of Dubuque’s 175th Anniversary (3 000)Zero Waste events have
generated between 30 pounds and 2,500 pounds per event
Planning and collection must be requested two weeks in advance
(3,000) Dubuque City Expo (3,000/yr) City of Dubuque Employee
Appreciation Luncheon (600/yr) Parish Festivals (3,000/yr)
Conferences (1,000/yr)
Church Retreats (200/yr)
W ddi (300/ )weeks in advance. Unlimited tipper carts are available.
Since inception about 10,000 pounds have been composted
Weddings (300/yr)
Workshops (500/yr)
Private Parties (300/yr)
(# participants in parenthesis)
11/11/2010
47
FY11 Current FeesApril through November
Residential – 13 gal GreenCart $0.60/monthg $ /
Commercial – 48 gallon Tipper Cart $5.50/mo
Commercial ‐ 64 gallon Tipper Cart $8.50/mo
December through March (Thursdays)
Residential – 13 gal GreenCart
$1.30 sticker per container or $4.80/month
Commercial – 48 gallon Tipper Cart $10.00 / mo
Commercial ‐ 64 gallon Tipper Cart $15.00 / mo
FY10 revenues were $4,300 in subscriptions and $500 in fees
Collection Costs
Co‐collection labor and trucking costs are virtually theCo collection labor and trucking costs are virtually the same as for refuse collection, since the residential food scraps would be collected anyway. No overtime was created. Commercial and school customers are collected on each neighborhood’s route day.
Composting tip fees ($26.19) and contracted refuse tip f ($27 63) i ll h d i d i hfees ($27.63) are virtually the same and are sited in the same DMASWA complex.
Administrative and promotional costs are very small
The cost of the carts ($23.00) is amortized over 7 years
11/11/2010
48
Net Operating Costs (Apr‐Nov):
Co‐Collection Labor (no overtime) sameCo Collection Labor (no overtime) same
Additional Truck Use and Fuel $ 100
Residential Composting Tipping Fees same
Non‐Offset Composting Tipping Fees $1,000
Promotion website & PSA
Decal Printing (amortized) $ 40 Decal Printing (amortized) $ 40
Cart Amortization per year $ 160
Administration (no added staff) $ 0
$1300 / 450 equivalent customers / 8 mo = $0.36 per mo
Off‐Season Net Operating Costs
Higher (Dec-Mar)Thursday Only Collections
Co‐Collection Labor (no overtime) same
Extra Truck Use and Fuel ‐$1,500
Non‐Offset Composting Tipping Fees ‐$ 150
Subscription or Call-In AppointmentIncludes Yard Debris Only Collection
Higher and Added Subscription Fees +$1,000
Increased Sale of Single‐Use Stickers +$ 500
Promotion Website & PSA
Administration (no added staff) $ 0
11/11/2010
49
Issues Driving Program Changes
1. Expand from Residential to Increase Diversion (Overcome 4‐08)Diversion (Overcome 4 08)
“Food Waste” was seen as more a business responsibility (grocery store / restaurant) rather than a household’s
St 1 E d ti d i ti tStep 1: Expand options and incentives to some commercial, institutional, school and event customers
Resurrection Parish Festival 2010
11/11/2010
50
5 Stream Materials Management
Issues Driving Program Changes
2. Make Program Permanent to Increase Diversion (overcome 4‐08)( )
Initially subscriptions were tentative because the program was a pilot and could be terminated by City Council.
Step 2: The pilot was evaluated followingStep 2: The pilot was evaluated following the second season and established as a permanent collection option.
11/11/2010
51
Issues Driving Program Changes
3. Reduce Customer Cost to Increase Diversion (overcome 4‐08)( )
Pilot was too expensive (initially $3.25/month)
Fee reduced to $1.25/month in 2007
More participation if fee was lowered further giving “more bang for the buck”. g g g
Step 3: 2008 Fee reduced to $0.50/month
4. Collect Year‐Round to Increase Diversion (Overcome 11‐09)
Issues Driving Program Changes
( )
Program was seasonal (Apr‐Nov) with yard debris co‐collection. Causes a “start and stop” barrier to participation
Step 4: Began a one day a week collectionStep 4: Began a one‐day‐a‐week collection (Dec‐Mar) for interested subscribers requiring a call‐in and use of $1.20 yellow sticker or $4.80 / month subscription.
11/11/2010
52
Issues Driving Program Changes
5. Reduce Regulatory Barriers to Increase Diversion (being reviewed)
The IDNR’s Tonnage Cap for food scraps at our YardThe IDNR s Tonnage Cap for food scraps at our Yard Waste Composting Facility is too low for increased diversion
Step 5: Seek a variance or rule change from IDNR’s Tonnage Cap. Raise the limit from 2 tons per week to 6 or even more tons per week Balance foodto 6 or even more tons per week. Balance food scrap weekly tons with complementary local feedstock volumes and using expanded pollution prevention controls
Interested in SubscribingWhen 2 Ton Cap is Raised
C i d th t t Casinos and other restaurants
Global computer services company
Two hospitals
National software design company
ManufacturerManufacturer
Grocery chain
City departments
60 residential customers on waiting list
11/11/2010
53
Issues Driving Program Changes
6. Incentivize Customers to Increase Diversion (being reviewed)
The subscription fee offers little customer incentive to reduce combined net solid waste disposal costs
Step 6: Once additional food composting capacity is approved by IDNR, then offer residential food
ll i b ib d i b k dscrap collection subscribers and active backyard composters an option: Only set out a trash container every other week with a special decal for a reduced monthly utility fee. This would grow subscribers.
Issues Driving Program Changes
7. Plan for Long‐Term to Increase Diversion (being reviewed)
A i t l i t i tAn incremental expansion to a six ton per week cap on food residual feedstock would still be too limiting for anticipated long term expansion.
Step 7: DMASWA to consider expanding its f ilit i t d l t tfacility or encourage private development to compost more than six tons per week of food residuals under future revised IDNR rules.
11/11/2010
54
Why Invest in Composting? (1)
Economic Prosperity: Demand far exceeds supply for certified quality local compostDemand far exceeds supply for certified quality local compost
Economic development interest, green jobs and innovation potential
More food residuals tonnage needed to improve ROI
Four years of experience in composting food scraps with trained staff
Available balanced feedstock to blend with food scraps
Why Invest in Composting? (2)
Environmental Integrity: Reduces significant air pollution and GHG
Amends soils for better stormwater infiltration
Reduces soil erosion and returns nutrients to soils
Food co‐composting can pose fewer risks than MSW composting
Social / Cultural Vibrancy:/ y Long waiting list to participate in curbside collection service
Supports citizen sustainability practices and resilience
Demo project with transferability to mid‐size communities
Reduces toxics impacting human health and wellness
Addresses an Iowa priority diversion material: Organics
11/11/2010
55
Issues Driving Program Changes
8. Expand Sites to Increase Diversion and other benefits (being reviewed)
Assist other local facilities in foodAssist other local facilities in food residuals diversion strategies:
A nursery currently composting yard debris
WWTPs and CAFOs with available anaerobic digestion capacity
A local university considering on‐campus y g pcomposting technology as part of a sustainability commitment, training for green careers and environmental science research
High Solids Anaerobic Digestion (dry) with added methane capture and utilization
Issues Driving Program Changes
9. Partnership pilots in the private sector (initiated & being reviewed)
John Deere ‐ Dubuque Works
• Cafeteria Pilot Project
Partnered with a private hauler
• Dittmer Recycling• Dittmer Recycling
Using 2‐yard dumpsters
weekly collection
11/11/2010
56
Materials Management Chain
John Deere Dubuque Works cafeteria qresiduals are source separated…
… and decomposed into a soil-like product
… hauled to the DMASWA Compost Facility, where they are shredded and windrowed…
John Deere Cafeteria Pilot:
Acceptable Materials
Food scraps All food scraps from the cafeteria or bag lunches
Although not generally acceptable in backyard composting, bones from chicken, ribs, etc. are accepted at the composting facility
Paper & other fiber products Paper plates paper cups thermal sleeves Paper plates, paper cups, thermal sleeves
“Clamshell” boxes made from bagasse, the fibers remaining from cane sugar production
Napkins
Paper & cardboard boxes
• e.g. Microwave dinner packaging
11/11/2010
57
Contact:
Paul SchultzPaul Schultz
Resource Management Coordinator
City of Dubuque
563.589.4250
Q & AQ & AType your questions into the chat pod on the
left side of the screen and hit send
11/11/2010
58
Today’s Speakers…
Mitch KesslerPresident
Kessler Consulting, Inc.Tampa, Florida
Paul SchultzCity of Dubuque
Resource Management CoordinatorDubuque, Iowa
Pat ParkerDirector of Support Services
Operations & Waste Management DivisionCity of HamiltonOntario, Canada
11/11/2010
59
www.apwa.net
Submit completed form to:
APWA, Attn: Heather DelaCruz, 2345 Grand Ave, Suite 700, Kansas City, MO 64118 - or - Fax: (816) 595-5315
The American Public Works Association
Education Session Evaluation
Organics Recycling: Going Beyond Yard Waste
Downloadable Program
Session Content: Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent
Program Content 1 2 3 4 5
Relevance of Topic 1 2 3 4 5
Overall Session Rating 1 2 3 4 5
After attending this session, I am now better able to: Strongly Disagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
… understand the value and costs of including organic recycling in my integrated waste management systems.
1 2 3 4 5
… develop a broad-based understanding of how organics recycling fits into optimizing materials management.
1 2 3 4 5
… communicate the benefits and operations of organics recycling to my community.
1 2 3 4 5
Skill of speaker(s) in presenting message:
Would you recommend to speak again? Poor Fair Good Great
Would you recommend to speak again?
Yes No
Mitch Kessler 1 2 3 4
Pat Parker 1 2 3 4
Paul Schultz 1 2 3 4
Moderator: Jeff Turner 1 2 3 4
Comments: