7
The Argumentative Appeals: Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond to Counterclaims/Counterarg uments Delacruz 2014

The Argumentative Appeals: Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond to Counterclaims/Counterargument s Delacruz 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Argumentative Appeals: Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond to Counterclaims/Counterargument s Delacruz 2014

The Argumentative Appeals:

Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond

to Counterclaims/Counterargu

mentsDelacruz

2014

Page 2: The Argumentative Appeals: Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond to Counterclaims/Counterargument s Delacruz 2014

RHETORICAL WEB Rhetoric may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the

available means of persuasion.—Aristotle

SOAPSTone

LOGOS: appeal to audience’s reasoning or logic

PATHOS: appeal to audience’s emotions

ETHOS: appeal to audience’s “ethical” desire to believe in the author’s credibility Aristotle’s

Appeals for Argumentative

Writing

Page 3: The Argumentative Appeals: Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond to Counterclaims/Counterargument s Delacruz 2014
Page 4: The Argumentative Appeals: Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond to Counterclaims/Counterargument s Delacruz 2014

LOGOS: appeal to audience’s reasoning or logic

(A B C) EXAMPLE:

ANALYSIS:

Page 5: The Argumentative Appeals: Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond to Counterclaims/Counterargument s Delacruz 2014

ETHOS: appeal to audience’s “ethical” desire to believe in the

author’s credibility/appeal to audience’s trust in the speaker

EXAMPLE:

ANALYSIS:

Page 6: The Argumentative Appeals: Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond to Counterclaims/Counterargument s Delacruz 2014

PATHOS: appeal to audience’s emotions

EXAMPLE:

ANALYSIS:

Page 7: The Argumentative Appeals: Persuasive Appeals to Support Claims and Respond to Counterclaims/Counterargument s Delacruz 2014

ARGUMENT = CONVERSATIONS