Upload
madison-obrien
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Irwin/McGraw Hill 7- 3 Topics Covered 72 Years of Capital Market History Measuring Risk Portfolio Risk and Diversification Beta and Unique Risk Diversification and Value Additivity
Citation preview
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 1
B40.2302 Class #3
BM6 chapters 7, 8, 9 Based on slides created by Matthew Will Modified 9/23/2001 by Jeffrey Wurgler
Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Opportunity Cost of Capital
Principles of Corporate FinanceBrealey and Myers Sixth Edition
Slides by
Matthew Will, Jeffrey Wurgler
Chapter 7
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 3
Topics Covered
72 Years of Capital Market History Measuring Risk Portfolio Risk and Diversification Beta and Unique Risk Diversification and Value Additivity
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 4
0.1
10
1000
1925 1933 1941 1949 1957 1965 1973 1981 1989 1997
S&PSmall CapCorp BondsLong BondT Bill
The Value of an Investment of $1 in 1926
Source: Ibbotson Associates
Inde
x
Year End
1
613
203
6.15
4.34
1.58
Real returns
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 5
Returns 1926-1997
Source: Ibbotson Associates
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
26 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
Common StocksLong T-BondsT-Bills
Year
Perc
enta
ge R
etur
n
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 6
Measuring Risk
Two standard measures of risk:
Variance - Average value of squared deviations from mean.
Standard Deviation – Square root of variance, I.e. square root of average value of squared deviations from mean.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 7
Measuring RiskExample: Calculating variance and standard deviation.
Suppose four equally-likely outcomes:
21.2%=450= varianceofroot square=deviation Standard
450=1800/4=0)( mean from deviations squared of average=Variance
90030-20-0010+0010+
90030+40+ DeviationSquared Meanfrom DeviationReturn(3)(2)(1)
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 8
Measuring Risk
1 1 24
12 1113
1013
3 20123456789
10111213
-50
to -4
0
-40
to -3
0
-30
to -2
0
-20
to -1
0
-10
to 0
0 to
10
10 to
20
20 to
30
30 to
40
40 to
50
50 to
60
Return %
# of Years Histogram of Annual Stock Market ReturnsHistogram of Annual Stock Market Returns
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 9
Measuring Risk
Diversification - Strategy designed to reduce risk by spreading the portfolio across many investments. Reduces risk but not expected return.
Unique Risk - Risk factors affecting only that firm. Also called “diversifiable risk” or “idiosyncratic risk”
Market Risk - Economy-wide sources of risk that affect the overall stock market. Also called “non-diversifiable risk” or “systematic risk”
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 10
Measuring Risk
Portfolio rateof return
=fraction of portfolioin first asset
xrate of returnon first asset
+fraction of portfolioin second asset
xrate of returnon second asset
((
(())
)
+ …
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 11
Measuring Risk
05 10 15
Number of Securities
Port
folio
sta
ndar
d de
viat
ion
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 12
Measuring Risk
05 10 15
Number of Securities
Port
folio
sta
ndar
d de
viat
ion
Market risk
Uniquerisk
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 13
Portfolio Risk
)rx()r(x Return PortfolioExpected 2211
)σσρxx(2σxσxVariance Portfolio 21122122
22
21
21
In the two-asset case,
Variance PortfolioofSqrt SD Portfolio
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 14
Portfolio RiskExample
Suppose you invest $55 in Bristol-Myers and $45 in McDonald’s. The s.d. of BM returns is 17.1% and the s.d. of McDonald’s is 20.8%. Assume they have a correlation of +1.00.
% 18.7 352.1 DeviationStandard
352.108)1x17.1x20.2(.55x.45x ]x(20.8)[(.45)
]x(17.1)[(.55) Variance Portfolio22
22
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 15
Portfolio RiskExample
Suppose you invest $55 in Bristol-Myers and $45 in McDonald’s. The s.d. of BM returns is 17.1% and the s.d. of McDonald’s is 20.8%. Assume they have a correlation of -1.00.
0 DeviationStandard
020.8)(-1)x17.1x2(.55x.45x ]x(20.8)[(.45)
]x(17.1)[(.55) Variance Portfolio22
22
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 16
Portfolio RiskThe shaded boxes contain variance terms; the others contain covariance terms.
12
3456
N1 2 3 4 5 6 N
STOCK
STOCKTo calculate portfolio variance add up the boxes
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 17
Beta and Unique Risk
slope =beta
Expected
return
ExpectedMarket risk premium
10%10%- +
10%
stock
Copyright 1996 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc
-10%
A security’s market risk is measured by beta, its expected sensitivity to the market.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 18
Beta and Unique Risk
Market Portfolio - Portfolio of all investable assets in the economy. In practice a broad stock market index, such as the S&P Composite, is used to represent the market.
Beta - Sensitivity of a stock’s return to the return on the market portfolio.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 19
Beta and Unique Risk
2m
imiB
Covariance with the market risk premium
Variance of the market risk premium
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 20
Diversification & Value Additivity
Value additivity holds …PV(A,B) = PV(A) + PV(B)
… since investors can diversify on their own They will not pay extra for firms that diversify And they will not pay less for firms that do
diversify, since they can “undo” its effect on their own account
Note: V.A. assumes no “synergies”
Risk and Return
Principles of Corporate FinanceBrealey and Myers Sixth Edition
Slides by
Matthew Will, Jeffrey Wurgler
Chapter 8
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 22
Topics Covered
Markowitz Portfolio Theory Risk and Return Relationship Testing the CAPM CAPM Alternatives
Consumption CAPM (CCAPM) Arbitrage pricing theory (APT)
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 23
Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Can combine individual securities into portfolios that achieve at least a given expected return at the lowest possible variance.
These are called the efficient portfoliosefficient portfolios. a.k.a. mean-variance efficient portfolios.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 24
Markowitz Portfolio Theory
100% Bristol-Myers-Squibb
100% McDonald’s
Portfolio Standard Deviation (%)
Portfolio Expected Return (%)
45% McDonald’s, 55% Bristol-Myers-Squibb
Portfolio expected return and standard deviation depends on the weights you put on each stock.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 25
Efficient Frontier
Portfolio Standard Deviation (%)
Portfolio Expected Return (%)
•Each half egg shell represents the possible combinations of two stocks.
•As you add more stocks, you can construct more complex portfolios.
•The composite using all securities is the efficient frontier, and the portfolios on the frontier are efficient portfolios.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 26
Efficient Frontier•Lending or Borrowing at the risk-free rate (rf) allows us to achieve combinations that are outside the efficient frontier.
•Would never choose T, for example, when could choose S and then borrow or lend
rf
Lending
BorrowingS
T
Portfolio Expected Return (%)
Portfolio Standard Deviation (%)
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 27
Security Market Line
Expected return
Beta
.
rf
rm Market Portfolio
1.0
SML
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 28
Security Market Line / CAPMExpected return
Beta
rf
1.0
SML
SML/CAPM: E[ri ] = rf + Bi (E[rm] - rf )
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 29
Testing the CAPM
Avg Portfolio Risk Premium 1931-65
Portfolio Beta1.0
SML30
20
10
0
Beta decile portfolios
Market Portfolio
Beta vs. Average Risk Premium
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 30
Testing the CAPM
Avg Risk Premium 1966-91
Portfolio Beta1.0
SML
30
20
10
0
Investors
Market Portfolio
Beta vs. Average Risk Premium
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 31
Testing the CAPM
0
5
10
15
20
25
Average Return (%)
Company size
Smallest Largest
Company Size vs. Average Return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 32
Testing the CAPM
0
5
10
15
20
25
Average Return (%)
Book-to-Market Ratio
Highest Lowest
Book-to-Market vs. Average ReturnBook-to-Market vs. Average Return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 33
Consumption Betas vs Market Betas
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Wealth = marketportfolio
Market risk makes wealth
uncertain.
Standard
CAPM
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 34
Consumption Betas vs Market Betas
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Wealth = marketportfolio
Market risk makes wealth
uncertain.
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Consumption
Wealth
Wealth is uncertain
Consumption is uncertain
Standard
CAPM
Consumption
CAPM
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 35
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Besides CCAPM, APT is another alternative to CAPMBesides CCAPM, APT is another alternative to CAPM
Expected Risk Premium
= r - rf
= Bfactor1(rfactor1 - rf) + Bf2(rf2 - rf) + …
Return = a + bfactor1(rfactor1) + bf2(rf2) + …
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 36
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
APT, like CCAPM, is an alternative to CAPM
If Return = a + b1*rfactor 1+ b2*rfactor 2 + …
Then Expected Return (risk premium) == ri – rf
= b1*(rfactor 1 - rf) + b2 *(rfactor 2 - rf) + …
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 37
Arbitrage Pricing TheoryEstimated risk premiums for taking on risk factors
(1978-1990 data)
6.36Market.83-Inflation
.49GNP Real.59-rate Exchange.61-rateInterest
5.10%spread Yield)(r
ium Risk PremAnnual EstimatedFactor
factor fr
Capital Budgeting and Risk
Principles of Corporate FinanceBrealey and Myers Sixth Edition
Slides by
Matthew Will, Jeffrey Wurgler
Chapter 9
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 39
Topics Covered
Measuring Betas Capital Structure and COC Discount Rates for International Projects Estimating Discount Rates – What if no beta? Risk and DCF
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 40
Company Cost of Capital
Value-additivity: Total firm value is the sum of the value of its various assets.
Note each PV on the right is evaluated at its own discount rate
PV(B)PV(A)PV(AB) valueFirm
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 41
Company Cost of Capital Company’s average cost of capital versus
individual project cost of capital. (CAPM)
Required
Return (%)
Project Beta1.26
“Company Cost of Capital”
13
5.5
0
SML
“Average Company Beta”
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 42
Measuring Betas
The SML shows the equilibrium relationship between expected return and risk (beta) according to the CAPM.
How to measure beta?
Typical approach: Regression analysis
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 43
Measuring Betas
Hewlett-Packard Stock Beta
Slope (beta) estimated from a regression over 60 months of return data.
Returns - Jan 88 to Dec 92
Market return (%)
Hew
lett-
Pack
ard
retu
rn (%
)
R2 = 0.45
B = 1.70
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 44
Measuring Betas
Returns - Jan 93 - Dec 97
Market return (%)
R2 = 0.35
B = 1.69
Hewlett-Packard Stock Beta
Hew
lett-
Pack
ard
retu
rn (%
)Slope (beta) estimated from a regression over 60 months of return data.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 45
Measuring Betas
AT&T Stock Beta
Returns - Jan 88 - Dec 92
Market return (%)
R2 = 0.28
B = 0.90
A T
& T
(%
)
Slope (beta) estimated from a regression over 60 months of return data.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 46
Measuring Betas
AT&T Stock Beta
Returns - Jan 93 - Dec 97
Market return (%)
R2 = 0.17
B = 0.90
A T
& T
(%
)Slope (beta) estimated from a regression over 60 months of return data.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 47
Beta Stability % IN SAME % WITHIN ONE RISK CLASS 5 CLASS 5 CLASS YEARS LATER YEARS LATER
10 (High betas) 35 69
9 18 54
8 16 45
7 13 41
6 14 39
5 14 42
4 13 40
3 16 45
2 21 61
1 (Low betas) 40 62
Source: Sharpe and Cooper (1972)
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 48 Company Cost of Capitalsimple approach
The overall company cost of capital is based on the weighted-average beta of the individual asset / project betas.
The weights in the weighted average are determined by the % of firm value attached to each asset / project.
Example: Say firm value is split as:1/3 New ventures investment (B=2.0)1/3 Expand existing business investment (B=1.3)1/3 Plant efficiency investment (B=0.6)
Average asset beta = (1/3)*2.0 + (1/3)*1.3 + (1/3)*0.6 = 1.3This average beta determines the company cost of capital.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 49
Capital Structure & COC
So we’ve established how to estimate the company cost of capital.
If you owned all of firm’s securities – 100% of its equity and 100% of its debt – you would own all its assets
Think of company cost of capital as expected return on this hypothetical portfolio.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 50
Capital Structure & COC
Company cost of capital = rportfolio = rassets
rassets = rdebt (D) + requity (E)
(V) (V)
Bassets = Bdebt (D) + Bequity (E)
(V) (V)
requity = rf + Bequity ( rm - rf )
IMPORTANT
E, D, and V are all market values
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 51
Capital Structure & COC
Changing capital structure can change the risk of the debt relative to the risk of the equity, but does not change the overall risk of the firm.
Changing capital structure therefore does not change the company cost of capital.
Let’s see how changes in capital structure change the costs of equity vs. debt…
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 52
0
20
0 0.2 0.8 1.2
Capital Structure & COC
Expected return (%)
Bdebt Bassets Bequity
rdebt=8
rassets=12.2
requity=15
Expected Returns and Betas before refinancing
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 53
0
20
0 0.1 0.8 1.1
Capital Structure & COC
Expected return (%)
BdebtBassets Bequity
rdebt=7.3
rassets=12.2requity=14.3
Expected Returns and Betas after refinancing
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 54
Capital Structure & COC
Go from estimated Bequity (say, from regression) and assumed / estimated Bdebt to compute Bassets
This is called unlevering beta
To unlever beta, just remember:Bassets = Bdebt (D) + Bequity (E)
(V) (V)
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 55
Pinnacle West Corp.
.15.51AverageIndustry 21.37. ResourcesL&PP21.43.CorpWest Pinnacle23.70. EnergyPECO15.39. EnergyOGE19.35.System ElectricNE18.65.Inc GPU19.66.Assoc UtilitiesEastern17.56. EnergyDTE20.65. EdisonedConsolidat18.30. HudsonCentral19.60. ElectricBoston ErrorStd.Bequity
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 56
Pinnacle West Corp.Requity = rf + Bequity ( rm - rf )
= 4.5 + .51(8.0) = 8.58%(Used industry average Bequity since PW’s Bequity was
measured with lots of error)
Rdebt = can estimate as YTM on PW bonds (Bond returns often hard to observe, so hard to estimate Bdebt)
= 6.90 %
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 57
Pinnacle West Corp.
%86.7
)58.8(57.)90.6(43.
capital ofcost company sPW'
equitydebtassets rVEr
VDr
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 58
COC for International Projects
Same principles apply, with complications
If project is owned by US investors, they care more about project’s beta with US market. Not about project’s beta with local market.
The theory is clearest if investors are globally diversified. Then relevant beta is beta with world market.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 59
What if can’t calculate Beta?
Suppose a new project doesn’t match the risk of traded securities… how to discount?
Need judgment. General advice: Avoid fudge factors in discount rate. Make
unbiased cash flow forecast (i.e. right on average).
Think about determinants of asset betas. Are project cash flows more or less cyclical than usual industry project?
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 60 Risk and DCF:Putting it all together
ExampleProject A is expected to produce CF = $100 mil for each of three years. Given a risk free rate of 6%, a market risk premium of 8%, and an asset beta of .75, what is the PV of the project?
%12)8(75.6
)(
fmf rrBrr
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
7- 61 Risk and DCF:Putting it all together
ExampleProject A is expected to produce CF = $100 mil for each of three years. Given a risk free rate of 6%, a market risk premium of 8%, and an asset beta of .75, what is the PV of the project?
%12)8(75.6
)(
fmf rrBrr
240.2 PVTotal71.2100379.7100289.31001
12% @ PV FlowCashYearAProject