23
THE PULSE THE NEWSLETTER OF THE ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY HOUSING OFFICERS JANUARY 2015 IN THIS ISSUE President’s Welcome [4] Professional Development [6] OACUHO Elections [7] Campus Community Partnerships [8] OACHUO Research [21] UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH HOME TO THE 2015 RESIDENCE LIFE CONFERENCE

The Pulse January 2015

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Official Newsletter of the Ontario Association of College and University Housing Officers

Citation preview

Page 1: The Pulse January 2015

THE PULSETHE NEWSLETTER OF THE ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY HOUSING OFFICERS

JANUARY 2015

IN THIS ISSUE

President’s Welcome [4] Professional Development [6]

OACUHO Elections [7] Campus Community Partnerships [8]

OACHUO Research [21]UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH

HOME TO THE 2015 RESIDENCE LIFE CONFERENCE

Page 2: The Pulse January 2015

Board of Directors

The Communications Committee

PRESIDENTLaura Storey | Carleton [email protected]

PRESIDENT-ELECT / FINANCE DIRECTORJulie West | University of Guelph [email protected]

PAST PRESIDENTChad Nuttall | University of Toronto Mississauga [email protected]

COMMUNICATION DIRECTOR Brian Cunha | University of Waterloo [email protected]

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORMatthew Harris | York University [email protected]

MEMBERSHIP ENGAGEMENT DIRECTORBrian Ingoldsby | University of Guelph [email protected]

CONFERENCE DIRECTORBrittany Gawley | McMaster [email protected]

CORPORATE PARTNER RELATIONS DIRECTORColin Ryrie | Brock [email protected]

SENIOR-LEVEL MEMBER AT LARGEGlenn Matthews | Western [email protected]

MEMBER AT LARGEMike Porritt | McMaster University [email protected]

MEMBER AT LARGESamantha Wiebe | University of Waterloo [email protected]

TH

E P

ULS

E DIRECTORBrian Cunha

CONTRIBUTORSDrew SimonHeather Lang

THE PULSE EDITORSVictoria GadonAlison KavanaghLyn-Marie FarleyKatie CalcaterraLaura Mammone

THE HISTORY PROJECTGlenn MatthewsMatt WaghornAndrew Quenneville

Page 3: The Pulse January 2015

6professional development

Table ofContents

7OACUHO elections

8campus community partnership

17facilities showcase

OACUHO Research

OACUHO spotlight moment 18

21

PDEDITOR

Brian Cunha

JANUARY EDITORSVictoria Gadon

Alison Kavanagh

off campus housing knowledge community

20

Page 4: The Pulse January 2015

    appy  New  Year  OACUHO!  I  hope  that  2015  brings           health  and  happiness  to  the  Housing  world.  

My  first  cheer  of  2015  goes  to  our  campus  and  community  partners.  With  you,  our  programs  are  more  robust  and  interconnected.  

There  are  so  many  types  of  partnerships  and  for  the  purposes  of  this  arIcle   I’m  going  to  focus  on  community  partners.   I’ve  been  a   lucky  campus   stakeholder   -­‐   part   of   numerous   partnerships   ranging   from  residence/hospital  agreements  to  P3s.  Here  are  some  of  my  insights:  1.   When   you’ve   seen   one   partnership…you’ve   seen   one  partnership.  It   goes   without   saying   but   no   two   partnerships   are   the   same.    Groups   and   communiIes   are   their   own   organisms   and   our  partnerships   with   them   require   care,   nurturing   and   development.  The   people   and   projects   in   these   communiIes   can   vary   in   size,  demographic,  finance,  etc.    When  iniIaIng  the  partnership,  sharing  what   you’ve   seen   that   is   successful   from  past   projects   can   lay   the  ground  work   in  development.  Moving   forward,   being  open   to  new  successes  and  ideas  will  help  this  partnership  take  on  its  own  shape.

While  not  easy,  feedback  can  help  the  relationship  grow  and  be  better  for  both  parties.      ”

- 4 -

H“

President’s Message

Community Connections

Page 5: The Pulse January 2015

2.    Campuses  should  engage  in  meaningful  and  inten;onal  ac;vi;es.When  engaging  community  partnerships  be   intenIonal  and  think   long  term  with  the  organizaIon   and   community   you’re  working  with.   Small   projects  without   long   term  goals   can   be   draining   on   both   parIes.   In   turn,   this   may   provide   less   meaningful  engagement   for  our  students  as   it  can  see  staff  drain,   less  conInuity   in  projects  and  negaIve  feelings  from  the  partners. 3.    We  all  have  something  to  gain.    Mutual  collaboraIon,  commitment  and  benefit  will  make  your  partnership  long  standing  and  successful.  Having  mutually  agreeable  outcomes  can  make  for  a  longer-­‐standing  relaIonship  and  will  keep  both  partners  happy.  Keep  these  in  mind  from  the  outset.  CommiYng  to  parIcipate  for  3  to  5  years  may  help  see  conInuity  and  growth  and  allow  for  the  partner  to  feel  the  true  benefit.    

4.    Find  ways  to  connect  at  reasonable  intervals  and  share  feedback.  While  not  easy,  feedback  can  help  the  relaIonship  grow  and  be  beZer  for  both  parIes.    SeYng  a  schedule  of  monthly  check-­‐ins  of  in-­‐person  visits  can  assist  with  relaIonship  growth  needed  to  develop  your  partnership.  How  o[en  are  you  reviewing  your  agreement?  Perhaps  one  Ime  per  year  you  sit  down  to  see  if  it  can  be  improved  for  the  next  go  round.    

5.    Manage  the  rela;onship  carefully.  As  a  key  stakeholder  in  the  relaIonship,  manage  it  like  you’re  a  parent.  As  lots  of  quesIons,  be  okay  with  saying  no  and  customize  it  in  order  to  be  the  best  fit  for  everyone.  Check  your  communicaIon  style,  how  o[en  you’re  communicaIng  and  what  kinds  of  “heads  up”  you’re  providing  to  the  key  stakeholders  on  their  end.  A  “heads  up”  can  proacIvely  keep  them  in  the  loop  –  especially  when  there  are  staffing  changes  in  your  area.   6.    Assess  and  evaluate.    What  do  you  define  as  successful  and  what  does  your  partner  define  as  successful?  It’s  a  good  thing  to  lay  this  groundwork  from  the  beginning.  Your  partner  may  define  “success”  as  something  very  different  than  you  do.  Know  how  they  speak  and  what  they’re  looking  for  right  from  the  get  go.  

There  is  no  perfect  formula  for  creaIng  and  maintaining  community  partnerships  –  but  I’m  sure  you  have  your  own  ideas.  Do  you  have  successful  and  meaningful  community  partnerships?    We’d  love  to  hear  about  what  you’ve  come  up  with.  Share  them  with  us  at  #oacuho.    

Laura  StoreyOACUHO  President

- 5 -

Page 6: The Pulse January 2015

- 6 -

Professional Development

February  1-­‐8       Toronto    February  3-­‐17                     Guelph    February  4-­‐5                         South  Porcupine    February  10-­‐11                     Windsor  February  12-­‐13                     Hamilton    February  12-­‐13*                   Waterloo    February  19-­‐20                     Whitby      February  21-­‐22                     Kitchener    February  21-­‐22                     Toronto    February  23-­‐24                     London  February  26-­‐27                     Waterloo  February  26-­‐27                     OZawa    February  26-­‐27                     Markham    February  26-­‐27                     Oakville  

*Adults  Who  Interact  with  Youth        

WORKSHOPS    

Professional Development

Challenging  Behaviours  in  Youth  –   Strategies  for  Interven6on February  5                          Mississauga  February  12                      OZawa    

Bullying  Interven6on  Strategies  –   Responding  for  Preven6on February  6                        MississaugaFebruary  13                    O>awa    

Suicide  Awareness  and  Interven;on  Live  Webinar February  24                      ONLINE    

February  7-­‐8                        Toronto      February  12-­‐13                Sioux  Lookout  February  12-­‐13                Oakville    February  17-­‐18                Burlington    February  17-­‐18                Toronto    February  18-­‐19                Toronto    February  18-­‐19                Guelph    February  19-­‐20                OZawa    February  21-­‐22                Windsor    February  23-­‐24                Vaughn    February  24-­‐25                Mississauga      

February  17-­‐18                Burlington    

Page 7: The Pulse January 2015

OACUHOELECTIONS

2015

The  OACUHO  Board  Needs  You  

NominaIons  are  coming  up  and  we  need  your  help.      

Serving  on  the  board  has  been  a  fun,  exciIng  and  inspiring  Ime.    Working  with  colleagues  from  across  the  province  has  been  rewarding  as  we've  shared  Ime  and  experIse  in  various  aspects  of  student  housing.    We  conInue  to  try  to  engage  those  from  various  backgrounds  to  serve  on  the  board  and  provide  PD  for  our  membership  -­‐  so  please  give  some  Ime  and  think  about  what  you  can  bring  to  the  board  for  the  2015-­‐16  term  (and  beyond).  

This  year,  several  posiIons  are  available:  President  Elect  (3  year  term)  Conference  Director  (2  year  term)  Membership  Engagement  Director  (1  year  term)  Professional  Development  Director  (1  year  term)  Communica;on  Director  (1  year  term)  Member-­‐at-­‐Large*  (1  year  term)  Senior  Member-­‐at-­‐Large**  (1  year  term)  * 2  posiAons  **  Experience  of  5  years  or  more  and  supervise  full  Ame  staff  

The  Imeline  is:  ·∙  NominaIons  Open:  Monday  Feb  23  ·∙  NominaIons  Close:    Friday  March  20  ·∙  VoIng  commences:  Thursday  March  26  ·∙  VoIng  concludes:  Wednesday  April  8

My   Ame   on   the   board   was   an  experience   that   I   thoroughly  enjoyed.   I   had   the   opportunity   to  learn   from   some   very   talented  people   and   developed   skills   in  areas   that   I   otherwise  would   not  have  had  the  opportunity   to.  One  area   that   I   developed   during   my  Ame   on   the   board   that   I   use  almost   every   day   now   is   the  ability   to   read   and   interpret  different   policies.   On   the   board   I  w a s   a b l e   t o   p a r t a k e   i n  conversaAons   about   amending  the   consAtuAon   and   in   my   job  now   as   Manger   of   Student  Conduct   I   have   been   able   to  implement  things  I   learned  as  the  cha i r   o f   two   consu l taAon  commi>ees   for   our   Codes   of  Conduct.    

The   posiAon   also   provided   the  o p p o r t u n i t y   t o   d e v e l o p  relaAonships  with  colleagues  from  across   the   associaAon   and   with  corporate   partners   and   other  interested   parAes   outside   of   the  Housing   world.   I   would   strongly  encourage   anyone   to   take   the  opportunity   and   apply   for   a  posiAon   that   interests   them   on  the   board.   When   I   first   started   I  was  worried  about   the  work   load  and   how   I   would   manage   it   but  looking  back  it  not  only  moAvated  me   to   stay   organized   and   on   top  of   things   but   it   also   provided   a  weekly   escape   from   the   day   to  day   rouAne   wh i ch   I   oRen  appreciated.    

Brent Rohrer

PRESIDENT-ELECT / FINANCE DIRECTORJulie West | University of [email protected]

Manager,  Student  Conduct  and  Community  Standards   McMaster  University  

Corporate  Partners   Director  2012-­‐2014  

- 7 -

Page 8: The Pulse January 2015

Campus Community Partnership

Campus Community PartnershipsUniversities  and  Colleges  are  often  structured  in  silos  but  many  of  the  departments  have  the  same  goals.  Is  your  housing  operation  creating  and  maintaining  effective  campus  and  community  partnerships?  

Page 9: The Pulse January 2015

- 9 -

         t  Trent  University,  community             partnerships   have   been   essenIal   to                  the  development  and  success  of  the                  Residence  EducaIon  program.  At  our   insItuIon,   a   vast   majority   of   the   Living  Learning   CommuniIes   are   for   students   who  share   common   interests   (i.e.   healthy   acIve  l i v i ng ,   c i v i c   engagement ,   e tc ) .   The  implementaIon   of   this   programming   model  called  for  us  to  look  beyond  the  boundaries  of  our  campus  for  community  partners  who  could  expand   the   knowledge   and   understanding   of  our   students   outside   of   the   classroom   and  within   our   residences.   However,   as   these  relaIonships   have   developed   and   gained  tracIon,   it   has   become   more   evident   that  community   partnerships   would   be   successful  within   all   residence   communiIes.   NavigaIng  through   these   new   community   relaIonships  when   done   intenIonally   and   with   care,  provides   students   with   opportuniIes   for  unique   experiences   and   strengthens   the   Ies  between   the   insItuIon   and   the   larger  community.

Be  inten;onal  with  the  partnerships  that  you  seekIn   researching   potenIal   partnerships   in   the  larger  community  and  intenIonally  “assigning”  them   to   a   specific   Living   Learning   Community  or   even   specific   program  iniIaIves,   you   are   bringing  together   like-­‐minded  groups  of  people  –  students  and  partners.  This   intenIon   demonstrates   to  the   potenIal   partner   that   you  are   seeking   not   just   anyone,  but   them   specifically.   In   your  iniIal   communicaIons,   share  with   them   what   you   know  about   their   organizaIon,   why  you   are   interested   in   working  with   them,   as   well   as   some  specific   ideas   for   working   together   in   the  future.   Do   you   want   them   to   come   in   as   a  speaker?   Facilitate   a   program?   Have   some  ideas  prepared  so  they  have  an  understanding  of   what   type   of   commitment  will   be   involved  on  their  part.  

share  with  them  what  you  know  about  their  organization,  why  you  are  interested  in  working  with  them

Lauren  Silvestro Residence  Life  Education  Coordinator  &  Campus  Conduct  Judicial  Of>icerTrent  [email protected]    

Navigating NewCommunity Partnerships

A

 ”

Page 10: The Pulse January 2015

Who  does  the  talking?   Reaching  out  to  new  partners  is  sIll  an  inImidaIng  task  for  myself,  however,   I  mindfully  decided  that  I  would   iniIate   these   conversaIons   with   potenIal  partners,   rather   than   my   student   staff.   Many  community  groups  will  be  approached  by  students  seeking   some   sort   of   sponsorship   and   it   is  important   that   you   disInguish   yourself   as   being   a  professional  from  your  insItuIon  and  that  you  are  not   seeking   sponsorship,   but   rather   a   mutually  beneficial  relaIonship.  You  are  looking  to  use  their  experIse   and   are   confident   that   they   will   find  working  with   your   students   rewarding.   Be   sure   to  menIon   your   student   leader   in   the   iniIal  conversaIon   and   connect   them   in   person  moving  forward   so   that   your   student   is   sIll   taking  ownership  over  their  community.    

Have  a  rockstar  student  leader  that  is  up  for  the   challenge   of   making   connecIons   with  community   partners?   Moving   into   second  semester,   I   am   giving   student   leaders   the  opportunity  to  start  these  dialogues  independently.  My   only   request   is   that   they   provide   me   with  informaIon   on   the   potenIal   partner   prior   to  contacIng   them,   and   that   I   be   a   part   of   the   first  face-­‐to-­‐face  interacIons  they  have.  

Be  transparent  and  proacIveWorking  with  residence  students,  there  is  one  thing  that   we   all   know:   students   can   be   unpredictable  when  it  comes  to  programming.  They  will  request  a  specific  program  for  weeks  and  when  your  student  staff  hold  it,  the  turnout  can  appear  meager.  While  we  may  have  become  accustomed   to   this   and  will  o[en   preach   that   one   student   aZending   is   a  successful   program,   such   a   turnout   to   a   campus  partner   could   be   seen   as   disappoinIng   and  potenIally   a   waste   of   Ime.   Be   honest   with   your  community   partner   about   a   realisIc   number   of  students   that   they   can   expect   will   aZend.  

Moreover,  if  ever  there  was  a  Ime  for  your  student  staff   to   step   up   their   “markeIng   game,”   it   will   be  when  a  community  partner  comes  to  campus;   this  means  unique  adverIsing  and  lots  of  door  knocking  for   the   student   staff.  With   that   being   said,   I   have  found  that  when  the  community  partner  is  tailored  to  the  interests  and  passions  of  the  students,  that  if  you   bring   the   community   partner,   students   will  come.  Gra;tude  is  key  for  long  las;ng  rela;onships   Never   allow  an  opportunity   to   thank   a   partner   be  passed   up.   This   year,   part   of   the   August  welcome  training   packages   that   our   Residence   EducaIon  staff  received  were  a  stack  of   thank  you  cards  and  the   challenge   to  meaningfully   use   them  all   by   the  end   of   the   year.   This   small   gesture   paired   with  printed  photos  of  the  program  or  event,  as  iniIated  by   the   students,   is   something   that   I   always   get  posiIve   feedback   on.   Furthermore,   it   is   o[en   a  reminder   on   a   partner’s   desk   that  we   appreciated  their  Ime  and  would  love  to  work  with  them  again  in  the  future.  A  thank  you  card  from  students  and  a  follow   up   email   from   yourself   is   the   perfect  combinaIon   for   a   long   lasIng,  mutually   beneficial  relaIonship.  

Community  partnerships  are  a  fabulous  way  to   expose   students   to   the   larger   community  surrounding  your  university  campus,  one  that  they  will   become   more   integrated   in   as   they   conInue  through  their  educaIonal  career  at  your  insItuIon.  In   seeking   out   partnerships   for   specific  communiIes   or   programs   in   residence,   you   are  communicaIng   to   that   potenIal   partner   that   you  are   intenIonally   seeking   their   experIse.  Furthermore,   it   increases   the   quality   of   the  programming   offered   because   of   the   passion   and  knowledge   of   these   partners.   I   challenge   you   to  idenIfy   a   community   partner   that  would   enhance  your  residence  program  and  reach  out  to  them  this  month!        

- 10 -

Page 11: The Pulse January 2015

- 11 -

       ne  of  the  more  important  relaIonships     insItuIons   need   to   manage   is   that   of  the   local   community.   Town   and   Gown  commiZees   -­‐   coaliIons   of   stakeholders   from  campuses   and   public   interest   groups   tasked  with   ensuring   posiIve   community   dynamics-­‐  are   commonplace   in   many   college   and  university  ciIes.  Our  residence  departments  are  uniquely   placed   to   have,   perhaps,   the   most  direct   influence   at   the   micro   level   of   the  economy.   From   economic   partnerships   (where  we  are   spending  our  programming  budgets)   to  service   partnerships   (those   businesses   we   rely  on   to   add   value   to   the   student   experience)   to  the  knowledge  economy  (those  gi[,  talent,  and  passion  sharers);  these  relaIonships  need  to  be  iniIated,   culIvated,  managed,   and  appreciated  in  order  to  flourish.Find  common  aXributes“You  can  make  more   friends   in   two  months  by  becoming   interested   in   other   people   than   you  

can   in   two   years   by   trying   to   get   other   people  interested  in  you.”    

―   Dale   Carnegie,   How   to   Win   Friends  and  Influence  PeopleOur  departments  are  built  with  people:  us.  We  come   with   all   of   our   own   interests,   and   our  personal  acIvity  spaces  may  bring  us  in  contact  with  diverse  realms  a[er  work  that  could  bring  unique  and  innovaIve  partnerships.  Consider   this.   I   frequent   the   local   farmers  market.   Though   it   is   not   as  big   as   some  of   the  markets   in   your   areas,   it   is   a   melIng   pot   of  people  looking  to  share  their   interests  with  the  community.   On   one   morning,   I   was   able   to  speak  with  a  woman  promoIng  a  mental  health  iniIaIve,  a  local  beekeeper,  a  tea-­‐maker  (also  a  student),  the  local  astronomy  group,  the  media  (which  I  aZracted  to  our  OrientaIon  Weekend),  and   the   head   of   the   Downtown   Improvement  AssociaIon  (a  frequent  partner  of  ours),  and  got  some  fresh  food.  Success!    

Martin  Holmes Supervisor,  Residence  ServicesNipissing  University [email protected]    

Community Partnerships

O

Page 12: The Pulse January 2015

For   me,   I   was   genuinely   interested   in   these  people  and  their  gi[s.  Having   a   grasp   on   what   our   students   were  interested   in   is   important   in   finding   the  community   partners   that   can   add   the  most   to  the  student  experience.  Using  a  student  centred  approach   to   programming   we   invoked   the   use  of   programming   surveys   and   relying   on  observaIons   and   student   behaviours   that  would   indicate   interest.   These   tools   helped  focus   some   of   these   meeIngs   with   more  genera l   feedback   (e . g .   interested   in  environmental   issues)   allowed  our   professional  staff  to  be  creaIve  in  their  outreach.  Knowing,   and   hiring   consideraIons   made   for,  the   interests   of   the   professional   and   student  staff   teams   can   be   an   excellent   avenue   for  already  networked  leads.  But,  cold-­‐calling  never  hurts,  just  be  sure  to  have  a  good  elevator  pitch  and   be   able   to   explain   your  mission   for   calling  (improving   service   or   educaIonal)   in   order   to  get  off  the  relaIonship  off  to  the  best  start.  Understand   what   mo;vates   your  partner Sociology   has   given   us   a   great   theory   in  understanding   how   our   community   partner  relaIonships   can   be   culIvated:   the   Social  Exchange   Theory   (Homans,   1958).   This   theory  describes   relaIonships   as   an   “economic”  exchange  where  both  parIes  act   in   a  way   that  maximizes   the   gains   and   rewards   from   the  relaIonship.   Self-­‐interest   and   interdependence   are   central  properIes   of   social   exchange.   In   reference   to  Social   Exchange   Theory,   self-­‐interest   is   not   a  wholly   negaIve   thing;   rather,   “when   self-­‐interest   (or  what  each  player   is   looking   to  gain  from  the  relaIonship)  is  recognized,  it  will  act  as  

the   guiding   force  of   interpersonal   relaIonships  for   the   advancement   of   both   parIes’"(Rolof,  1981).   Some   partners  may   look   to   forge   relaIonships  with   our   insItuIons   for   the   more   obvious  business   advantages   -­‐     to   gain   customers,   a  markeIng   segment,   to   meet   governmental  mandates   for   funding,   or   to   have   their   public  image   be   seen   as   a   strong,   local   community  member/organizaIon.   These   relaIonships,  though  not   totally   altruisIc,   are   important  and  can   lead   to   longer-­‐term,   dependable   business  partnerships. Other   partners   can   seem   to   have   more  humanist   intenIons,   though   no   less   beneficial.  Volunteers,   friends   of   the   “residence   family”,  small  business  owners,  non-­‐profit  organizaIons,  alumni,   and   faculty   are   all   potenIal   partners  that  may   look   to   serve  our   students   as  part   of  their   sense   of   commitment   to   the   community.  You  may  even  be  able  to  offer  them  more  than  they   expected!   A   menIon   in   the   campus  newsleZer,   social   media   exposure,   an   arIfact  for  their   tenureship  porxolio,  or  a   line  on  their  resume  would  all  go  along  way  to  enhance  the  experience.  O[en  Imes   these  partners  are   the  ones  that  need  much  more  details  to  work  out,  as  they  are  more  likely  to  be  single  events. In   working   with   community   partners   it   is  important   to   put   the   effort   in   to   understand  fully  what   their  moIves   are,   both   intrinsic   and  extrinsic,   and  what   our   departments   can   bring  to   that   relaIonship;   be   it   interested   students,  space,   or   a   community   of   learners/interest/pracIIoners.   Invite  them  to  your  community  

You’ve   made   contact   and   understand  the   moIves   of   your   partner,   now   it’s   Ime   to  make  arrangements  to  welcome  them  into  your  residence   community.   The   management   of   a  

- 12 -

Page 13: The Pulse January 2015

community   partner   relaIonship   is   another  consideraIon  that  must  be  made  to  saIsfy  both  parIes. Our   residence   policies   are   not   well   known   to  outsiders  and  can  act  as  a  barrier   to  successful  partnerships.  It  is  important  to  manage  most  of  the  details   in-­‐house  and   rely  on   the  partner   to  provide  and  manage  their  end  of  the  exchange.  Depending  on  the  service  offered,  make  sure  to  meet  with  partner   to  discuss   suitability,   supply  n e e d s ,   a n d   t o   c o n v e y   a n y   s p e c i a l  accommodaIons  the  audience  may  have.  Some  of   the   details   that   may   need   to   be   organized  are:   scheduling   opImal   Ime,   recruiIng  aZendees,  adverIsing  and  promoIon  methods,  security,   program   tracking   and   assessment,  space   booking,   AV/technology   requests,   media  exposure,  even  parking.   Of   course,   every   community  member  may   not  be   a   good   fit   for   your   residents’   interest   or  needs  and  one  way  to  leave  a  sour  feeling  from  the   community   (including   those   who   the  partner  interacts  with)  is  to  host  an  event  that  is  very   poorly   aZended.   One   tacIc   used   is   to   be  upfront   with   your   community   partner   about  student   driven   programming   -­‐   even   the   best  thought   programs   may   be   a   miss   due   to   any  number   of   factors   or   moods.   A   sign-­‐up   sheet  with   a   proposed   date   and   Ime   is   one   way   to  predict  how  popular  the  event  may  be;  this  also  allows  you  to  predict  the  logisIcal  elements  and  arrange   supplies   and   recruiIng   student  “connectors”   to   influence   the   community   in  your  favour. Perhaps   the   best   way   to   ensure   that   a  community  partners  experience  on  our  campus’  are   rewarding   is   to  keep   the  human  element  a  high   priority.   ConversaIon   beforehand,  someone  to  greet  the  guest  on  arrival,  someone  assigned   to   problem   solve   (especially   logisIcs)  and   serve   them   (for   example,   offering  

refreshments),  and  someone  to  ensure  they  can  make  it  back  to  their  vehicle  safely.  Maintaining  this   contact,   without   being   overbearing,   can  leave   a   posiIve   impression   on   your   guest.   I  always   try   and   uIlize   a   student;   with   some  coaching   beforehand,   asking   a   student   to   host  your  partner   is   an  excellent  way  of   challenging  their  networking  skills. Apprecia;ng  Apprecia;onWith   the   holiday   season   just   passed,   readers  can   relate   to   the   struggle   to   express  appreciaIon   -­‐   while   keeping   to   a   budget.   By  understanding   the   moIvaIonal   factors   that  form   the   your   relaIonship   exchange,   your  appreciaIon   strategy   could   be   quite   different  for  each  partner  you  work  with.    A  economic-­‐based  partnership  may  only  need  a  quarterly   or   semi-­‐annual   communicaIon   to  relay   any   assessment   and   staIsIcs   you   have  gathered  and  to  extend  the  arrangement.  If  you  can  prove  that  you  are  delivering  benefit  to  the  group,   your   chances   of   retaining   the   service   is  much  beZer.   If   you  are  exceeding  both  of  your  expectaIons,   perhaps   there   is   room   for   more  negoIaIon:  if  you  can  give  more,  they  may  too.   Other   partners   are   harder   to   appreciate,   as  their  moIvaIons  might  be  quite  diverse  and  the  relaIonship  quite  different.  It  is  usually  polite  to  offer   a   gi[   for   their   Ime   and   commitment.   If  you   can,   allocate   some   of   the   budget.   Buying  bulk   gi[   items   with   others   on   campus   could  enable   you   to   get   some   variaIon   in   your   gi[s,  but,   in   my   experience,   the   volume   of   product  you  need  to  order  to  save  is  hardly  jusIfied  for  a  handful   of   relaIonships.   If   you   can,   try   for   the  more  unique   -­‐   or  beZer,   homemade.   Shopping  local   or   visiIng  websites   hosIng   arIsts’   wares  (like   etsy.com)   are   great   ways   to   get   unique,  hand-­‐chosen   for   a   reason,   affordable   gi[s.  BeZer   sIll,   have   your   creaIve   staff   help   or  program   around   creaIng   affordable   gi[s   and  

- 13 -

Page 14: The Pulse January 2015

cards.   The   students   are   the   beneficiaries   of  these  relaIonships  and  might  enjoy  the  chance  to  be  involved  in  the  thanking.  Some  partners  may  just  need  a  handshake  or  a  hug  (use  your   judgment!)  and  to  be  kindly  told  that  the  sharing  of  their  gi[  means  a  great  deal.  UlImately,  geYng  to  know  the  partner  you  are  working   with   is   an   important   part   of   properly  appreciaIng  the  relaIonship.  Make  an  effort  to  be  interested  in  them  and  it  will  be  much  easier  and  much  more  effecIve.  Schools   and   the   local   communiIes   need   each  other.   We   need   each   other   to   strengthen   the  local  economy  -­‐  the  economic,  the  service,  and  t h e   s o c i a l   e conomy.   Ou r   r e s i d en ce  environments   have   an   opportunity   to   be   the  

curators   of   these   posiIve   relaIonships   to   free  Town  and  Gown   commiZees   to   discuss   poliIcs  of   higher   order.   In   order   to   to   do   this  successfully,   careful   aZenIon  must  be  given   to  the   iniIaIon,   the   invitaIon,   the  management,  and  appreciaIng  the  relaIonships  we  have  with  all  partners.   Now   it’s   your   turn!   Please   visit   the   OACUHO  Facebook   group   to   share   the   successes   you’ve  had  in  your  community   References:    

Homans,  George  (1961).  Social  Behavior:  Its  Elementary  Forms.  New  York:  Harcourt  Brace  Jovanovich.  p.  13.  

Roloff,   Michael   (1981).   Interpersonal  communicaIon:  The   social  exchange  approach.  Beverly  Hills.  

Sonja  Smiljanic   Residence  Life  Coordinator Queens  University [email protected]        

It’s true…we really do get by with a little help from our friends!

I   knew   I   had   to   jump   on   board  with   submiYng   a   piece   to   The  Pulse   this   month   when   I   found  out   that   the   theme   was   campus  partnerships.   My   passion   for   Res  Life  really  came  alive  when  I  came  to  the  realizaIon  that  in  this  field  collaboraIon   is   where   the   real  magic   happens   –   the   kind   of  magic   that   changes   lives.   Those  moments   when   you   help   refer   a  student,   give   them   advice   from  your   lived   experience,   make   the  right   judgment   call   in   crisis  situaIons;   all   of   those   moments  

are   born   from   a   culminaIon   of  skills,  experience,   training,  and  I’d  say  in  more  cases  than   not…partnering   with   a  campus  partner.   During   my   Ime   at   both   the  University  of  Guelph  and  Queen’s  University   I’ve   been   fortunate   to  partner   up   professionally   with  some   amazing   people   and  departments   –   Guelph’s   Campus  Community   Police,   Queen’s’  Health   Counselling   &   DisabiliIes  Services,   Health   PromoIons,  

- 14 -

Page 15: The Pulse January 2015

FaciliIes,   Admissions…the   list   goes   on.   One  partnership  that  has  stayed  constant  in  my  Res  Life   life   has   been   that   of   student   medical  response   teams,   and   it   is   the   partnership   I  would  like  to  highlight.  The  purpose  of  sharing  my  experience  with  this  parIcular  partnership  is   to   shed   light   on   the   world   of   student  medical   response,   to  encourage   conversaIon,  to   share   a   liZle   bit   about   what’s   happening  here  at  Queen’s,  and  to  hopefully  inspire  some  discussion  at  your  home  insItuIons. During   my   third   year   as   a   student-­‐staff   at  Guelph  I  began  intenIonally  working  with  the  medical   response   group   that   exists   there–  creaIng   and   facilitaIng   on-­‐going   training   to  bridge   the  gap  between  student  Res  Life   staff  and   the   student  medical   response   team.   The  idea  to  do  this  was  born  two  years  prior,  when  I   realized   that   I   had   a   much   easier   Ime  working  with   the   student  medical   responders  whom  I  knew  or  had  worked  with  before.  That  liZle   connecIon   made   such   a   difference;  communicaIon   flowed   easier,   I   felt   more  confident   and   helpful,   and   situaIons   were  h a nd l e d   mo re   effe cI ve l y.   I   b e ga n  conversaIons   with   the   group   the   following  year   about   providing   training   and/or   social  opportuniIes   for   our   teams   to   meet,   learn,  and   bond.   I   was   even   fortunate   enough   to  present   at   the   Residence   Life   Conference   in  2011  (which,  coincidentally  was  hosted  by  my  future   and   current   insItuIon,   Queen’s  University)   about   campus   collaboraIon   in  emergency  response.  The  session,  Itled,  “I  get  by   with   a   liZle   help   from   my   friends”  drummed   up   some   posiIve   feedback,   and   a  lot   of   discussion   that   didn’t   seem   to   be  happening  much  unIl  then.  

The  truth  is,  we  all  do  really  get  by  with  a  liZle  help   from   our   friends.   In   the   realm   of  emergency  response  that  is  especially  true.  I’m  no  expert  in  emergency  or  crisis  management,  but   a   parIcular   interest   in   safety   and   risk  management   has   afforded   me   some  opportuniIes  parIcularly  at  Queen’s  that  have  allowed  me  to  work  with  departments  such  as  Environmental   Health   and   Safety,   Campus  Security   &   Emergency   Services,   and   Queen’s  First  Aid. As   menIoned,   I’m   going   to   focus   on   the  partnership  with  our  student  medical  response  group;  they  are  called  Queen’s  First  Aid.  As  the  student   medical   response   group   on   our  campus,  this  team  of  student  volunteers  takes  part   in   a   rotaIng   on   call   schedule   to   provide  coverage   for   campus   for   most   of   the   school  year.   Responders   are   AMFR   cerIfied   –  Advanced   Medical   First   Responder   training   –  and   take   part   in   on-­‐going   training   and  professional   development   opportuniIes.  Queen’s  First  Aid,  like  many  university  student  medical   response   groups   are   part   of   a   larger  associaIon  called  ACERT  –  the  AssociaIon  for  Campus   Emergency   Response   Teams   –   and  aZends  annual  conferences  and  compeIIons.  “MIXER”   is   an   annual   compeIIon   where  teams   from   colleges   and   universiIes   come  together,   get   mixed   up   and   placed   in   new  teams  for  the  duraIon  of  the  compeIIon,  and  respond   to   simulated   emergencies   that   are  centred   around   a   theme.   These   teams   are  judged,   graded,   and   ranked,   and   a   winner   is  announced   at   the   end   of   the   two-­‐day  compeIIon .   S im i l a r l y,   the   NaIona l  Con fe rence   fo r   Campus   Emergency  Responders   (NCCER)   br ings   together  compeIIon   with   conference-­‐style   sessions  that  are  also  centred  around  a  theme.  In  2011  

- 15 -

Page 16: The Pulse January 2015

I  was   fortunate  enough   to  aZend  NCCER  as  a  guest  delegate  when  the  theme  was  “Trauma”.  I   got   to   sit   in   on   sessions   taught   by   top  emergency   room   doctors,   surgeons,   and  leading   professionals   in   the   medical   field.   All  of   this   because   of   a   campus   partnership   that  sparked  some  aZenIon. At   present,   our   Res   Life   department   here   at  Queen’s   has   a   posiIve   relaIonship   with  Queen’s  First  Aid.  For  the  past  two  years  we’ve  offered   on-­‐going   training   to   our   Dons   in  collaboraIon   with   Queen’s   First   Aid   that   is  focused   on   learning   about   each   other’s   roles  on   campus   and   in   residence,   exploring  mission/vision/mandates,   discussing   how  things  like  confidenIality  come  into  play  when  responding   to   emergencies,   and   how   each  group  can  help  one  another  and  work  together  effecIvely.   UlImately   these   tra in ing  opportuniIes   allow   for   the   two   groups   to  partner   and   learn   together   in   a   seYng   that  isn’t   an   emergency;   one   that   allows   for  quesIons,  for  geYng  to  know  each  other,  and  for   planning   for   those   emergency   situaIons.  The   feedback   received   for   these   on-­‐going  training   sessions   has   been   overwhelmingly  posiIve   both   from   our   Dons,   and   from   the  student   medical   responders   as   wel l .  AddiIonally,   I   have   had   the   exciIng  opportunity   to   aZend   the   team’s   Annual  Review   banquet   for   two   years   now   as   an  honorary  guest  alongside  representaIves  from  St.   John’s   Ambulance   and   Campus   Security  &  Emergency   Services.   I   was   also   able   to  volunteer   at   MIXER   2013   when   Queen’s  hosted   the   compeIIon.   These   opportuniIes  to   engage   outside   of   actually   responding   to  

emergencies   have   set   the   tone   for   posiIve  collaboraIon   and   teamwork.   Our   close  relaIonship   with   Campus   Security   &  Emergency  Services   (which   is   the  department  that  ulImately  oversees  Queen’s  First  Aid)  has  helped  as  well.  We  regularly  check  in  with  the  Director   and   ExecuIve   members   of   Queen’s  First   Aid   to   see   how   things   are   going   and   to  conInue   planning   and   working   towards  effecIve  teamwork.  Overall,  open  and  regular  communicaIon  has  been  the  key. In   emergency   response   campus   partnerships  are   o[en   very   important.   Different   training,  skills,   experIse,   and   even   goals   can   work  magic  when  brought  together  effecIvely. If  your  campus  has  a  student  medical  response  team   and   you’re   interested   in   learning  more,  reach  out!  I  speak  from  experience  when  I  say  that   one   small   conversaIon   that   starts   with  “So,   how’s   it   going   for   your   team   this   year?”  and  “What  can  we  do  to  make  it  beZer?”  can  open   a   whole   world   of   exciIng   collaboraIon  rooted  in  a  posiIve  and  strong  partnership.  Interested   in   learning   more   about   ACERT,  MIXER,   or   NCCER?   Check   out   this   link   to  explore:  

hZp://www.acert.ca/   If  you’d  like  to  get  in  touch  to  chat  more,  or  to  get   a   copy   of   the   on-­‐going   training   session  outline   we   use   at   Queen’s   please   don’t  hesitate  to  get  in  touch!  Happy  collabora;ng!  

- 16 -

Page 17: The Pulse January 2015

- 17 -

Facili;es  Drive-­‐In  2014  ReviewHappy   New   Year   OACUHO!   I   hope   everyone   had   a  chance   to   relax   and  enjoy   their  holidays   and   that   the  New   Year   is   off   to   a   great   start.   For   this   month’s  FaciliIes   Showcase   I   would   like   to   do   a   review   of  another  successful  FaciliIes  Drive-­‐In  Conference.  

There   were   over   40   people   registered  represenIng   over   10   different   insItuIons   and   across  all   different   fields   as   well.   Whether   it   be   caretaking  services,   housing   services   or   even   resident   life   there  were  many  people  who  expressed  a  variety  of  different  backgrounds   and   experience   making   for   a   very  successful   and   entertaining   day.   For   those   that   could  not   make   it   I   hope   this   gives   you   an   opportunity   to  catch   up   on   what   you   missed   and   I   apologize   if   the  weather   condiIons   the   day   before   kept   you   from  making  it.  

Before   I   start   I   would   like   to   thank   Michael  PorriZ   and   the  McMaster  University   team   for  hosIng  the   2014   OACUHO   FaciliIes   Drive-­‐In   Conference.  Without   their   help   this   event   would   not   have   been  possible.   Another   big   thank   you   goes   out   to   Chris  Bumbacco  from  Western  University  for  all  of  his  help  in  assisIng   with   the   organizaIon   of   the   day’s   events.  Thank  you  to  all  of  the  presenters.  All  of  the  topics  and  presentaIons  were  well  put  together,  very  interesIng,  and   I   think   everyone   took   away   some   helpful  informaIon  back  home  with   them.  Last  but  definitely  not   least,   thank   you   to   everyone  who   aZended   and   I  hope  you  had  an  informaIve  and  fun  day!  

The   day   started   out   with   a   presentaIon   by  Andrea  Walsh  from  Trent  University.  Her  topic  was  on  the  Accessibility  for  Ontarians  with  DisabiliIes  Act  and  how  this  affects  Housing  and  FaciliIes  Management  in  the  PSE   sector.  Walsh  gave  us  a   lot  of   informaIon  on  how  the  AODA  affects  us  and  what  we  can  look  out  for  in  our  new  builds  and  larger  renovaIons.  I  believe  that  the  biggest  thing  that  I  took  out  of  this  presentaIon  is  how   much   can   be   taken   for   granted   and   how  inaccessible  some  of  our  buildings  can  be.  We  need  to  conInue   to   try   our   best   to   ensure   that   our   students  and  colleagues  can  enjoy  our  campuses  as  barrier  free  as  possible.  

The   second   presentaIon   of   the   day   was  presented   by   Jenny   MacIntyre   and   Sheila   Goodwin  from   the   University   of   Waterloo.   Their   presentaIon  was   on   their   twenty   hour   turnover   in   their   100  townhouses.   MacIntyre   and   Goodwin   explained   their  process   of   making   sure   that   their   turnovers   always  resulted   in   a   great   success   and   a   reduced   work   day  than  they  had  previously.   It   is  amazing  how  well  both  Goodwin  and  MacIntyre  communicate  and  organize  to  ensure  that  all  of  their  teams  stay  connected  and  work  cohesively.   MacIntyre   and   Goodwin   also   presented   a  video   that   is   given   out   to   their   tenants   in   these  townhouses  which  explained  the  essenIals  and  safety  Ips   for   their   new   homes.   The   video   included   short  clips  on  how  to  turn  off  water  in  case  of  leaks  or  floods,  how   to   set   the   temperature   properly   and   also  where  everything  is  located  in  the  home  among  other  things.  I  thought  this  was  a  fantasIc  idea  to  help  new  tenants  troubleshoot  issues  they  may  come  across  and  also  to  protect   not   only   UofW’s   buildings   but   to   ensure  student  safety  as  well.  

OACUHO Facilities Showcase

Myles  Latter Coordinator,  Housing  Facilities Trent  University  

Page 18: The Pulse January 2015

I

A[er  a  delicious  lunch  we  were  given  a  tour  of  some   of   the   buildings   on   the   McMaster   campus   by  Michael  PorriZ  and  Patrick  Burke.  Among  this  tour  we  got  to  take  a  look  at  some  recent  renovaIons  done  to  Edwards  Hall  which   is  one  of  the  original  buildings  on  the  Hamilton  campus.  McMaster  has  turned  this  space  into   an   amazing   common   area   for   students   to   gather  and   enjoy   themselves   to   play   pool   or   music,   a   new  kitcheneZe   space   and   study   lounges   with   electrical  outlets   for   computers   and   electronic   devices.   It   was  amazing  to  see  how  this  space  was  uIlized  now  to  be  such  a  central  hub  for  students  to  hangout  and  uIlize.  McMaster   also   found   that   the   students   really  respected  the  space  too  which  is  great  to  see.  

The   final   presentaIon   of   the   day   was   a  presentaIon  from  the  group  OECM.  OECM  is  a  not-­‐for-­‐

profit   group   procurement   organizaIon;   offering  collaboraIvely-­‐sourced  products  and  services  for  areas  such   as   operaIons   and   maintenance.   EffecIvely,   it  works   by   finding   insItuIons   who   have   similar   needs  can  work  with  OECM  to  come  up  with  a   larger  RFP  to  benefit  all  parIes  with  possible  savings  and   increased  quality.   This   was   OECM’s   first   look   at   OACUHO   and   I  think   the   members   in   aZendance   realized   the  potenIals   for   further   opportuniIes   to   take   place.   I  really   think   there   are   going   to   be   a   lot   more  collaboraIons  in  the  near  future.  

I  want   to   thank  everyone  again   for   aZending,  presenIng  and  making  the  day  an  enjoyable  success.  I  hope  to  see  you  all  again  soon.  

n   graduate   school   I   spent   a   lot   of   Ime     talking  with  one  of  my  professors   about  change,   transiIon,   and   emoIons   associated  with   change.   While   reassuring   me   that   things  usually   do   work   out   in   the   end,   she   reminded  me   that   it   takes  work   to   get   to   the   end   of   the  road.    Frequently  our  conversaIons  would   turn  to  a  favourite  quote  from  Marilyn  Ferguson.    

”It’s  not  so  much  that  we  are  afraid  of  change  or  so   in   love  with   the  old  ways,  but   it’s   that  place  in-­‐between  that  we  fear…it’s  like  being  between  trapezes.     It’s   Linus   when   his   blanket   is   in   the  dryer.   There’s   nothing   to   hold   onto”   (Ferguson,  n.d.).    

Spotlightmoment

Jen  Coulter Director,  Housing Trent  University   [email protected]  |  @jen_coulter  

- 18 -

Page 19: The Pulse January 2015

I  recently  changed  roles,  insItuIons,  and  ciIes,   and   while   preparing   for   this   change   I  frequently   reflected   on   this   quote.   During   past  transiIons,   I   o[en   had   felt   like   Linus.   To   help  with  the  “iky  in-­‐between,”  this  Ime  I  framed  my  change  process  around  The  first  90  days:  Proven  strategies   for   geYng   up   to   speed   faster   and  smarter  (Watkins,  2013).     Watkins  (2013)  posits  that  the  acIons  one  takes  within   the   first   few   months   in   a   new   role   will  largely   define   success   or   failure,   and   that   there  are  key  strategies  that  can  ensure  success.  While  the  book  covers  many   strategies,   some  seemed  natural   (e.g.  conversaIons  with  supervisors  and  team   members   to   negoIate   and   solidify  expectaIons),  while  others  provided  frameworks  that   helped  me   to   think   about   the   culture   and  environment   I   was   entering   (Watkins,   2013).  Watkins  (2013)  suggests  that  a  central  tenant  to  making   a   successful   transiIon   starts   with   one  idenIfying  and  understanding  the  organizaIonal  situaIon,   matching   strategy   to   situaIon,   and  taking  appropriate  acIons  in  alignment  with  the  strategy.   The   tenants   outlined   take   significant  Ime   and   an   investment   in   geYng   to   know  people  and  the  organizaIon  itself.      

I   began   approaching   this   somewhat   daunIng  task  by  meeIng  with  people  individually.  For  the  first  90  days  I  met  weekly  with  my  team  in  staff  meeIngs   and   60   minute   one   on   one   meeIngs  that   allowed   me   to   get   to   know   how   we   as   a  team   interacted   with   each   other   and   where  people  were  “at.”  We  engaged  in  what  we  called  “Teach   Jen”   conversaIons,   where   the   team  taught   me   about   how   their   areas   worked   at  Trent   University.     These   sessions   not   only  provided  me  with  some  insight  into  tremendous  successes,  challenges,  and  areas  of  opportunity,  but   also   allowed   me   to   spend   Ime   geYng   to  know  them  and  their  work  context  on  a  deeper  

level.     These   strategies   helped   me   to   idenIfy  what   our   internal   situaIon   was   and   begin   to  work  with  team  members  to  define  our  prioriIes  moving  forward. Looking   outward   to   the   rest   of   the   university,   I  did  what  Watkins   (2013)  calls  an  environmental  scan.     Over   the   last   70   days   I   met   with   5-­‐6  campus  and  community  partners  a  week  to  have  30   minute   conversaIons   on   the   relaIonship  between   our   offices,   their   needs   from   us,   and  the  answer  to  my  favourite  quesIon  “How  can  I  make  your  life  easier?”    I  learned  so  much  about  the  university,  its  intricacies,   and   of   course   quirks,   and   o[en   le[  the  conversaIon  with  an  ally  and  in  a  few  cases  a  new  friend  (helpful  in  a  new  place  too!). As  I  leave  the  first  90  days  and  head  into  month  4   at   Trent   University,   I   know   that   there   is   sIll  way   more   to   learn.   My   choice   to   use   Watkins  (2013)  as  a   framework   for  my   transiIon  helped  me  to  feel  that  although  there  were  days  where  if  felt  like  the  blanket  had  gone  missing,  most  of  the  Ime  the  trapezes  have  been  closer  together  than  ever  before.    For  me,  beyond  anything  else,  that  is  a  successful  jumping  off  point  for  the  next  90  days.References  

Ferguson,  M.  (n.d.).   in  B.  Thames  &  D.W.  Webster   (2009).   Chasing   change:   Building  organizaIonal   capacity   in   a   turbulent  environment.    Hoboken,  NJ:    Wiley.    

Watkins,  M.  D.    (2013).  The  first  90  days:  Proven   strategies   for   geYng  up   to   speed   faster  and   smarter.   10th   anniversary   ediIon.   Boston,  MA:    Harvard  Business  Review.  

- 19 -

Page 20: The Pulse January 2015

- 20 -

This   past   fall,   our   off-­‐campus   housing   office   and   two  other   campus   partners   finalized   a   memorandum   of  understanding  relaIng  to  off-­‐campus  student  support.  Through   the   summer,   during   our   strategic   planning  process   to   reach   the   MOU,   it   became   evident   that  learning  from  other  insItuIons  and  sharing  knowledge  and   best   pracIces   in   the   off-­‐campus   area   would   not  only   benefit   our   immediate   group   but   it   could  potenIally  impact  other  insItuIons  as  well.  Near   the  beginning  of   the   fall   term,   I   connected  with  professional  staff  at  various  insItuIons  that  coordinate  or   manage   their   respecIve   off-­‐campus   operaIons.  Fortunately,   there   was   an   appeIte   from   Laurier,  Guelph,  Brock,  UOIT,  McMaster,  UofT,  and  Western  to  connect  and  share  with  one  another. In   November,   McMaster   Off-­‐Campus   Housing   hosted  the   first   meeIng   and   those   in   aZendance   (Brock  University,   University   of   Guelph,   Wilfrid   Laurier  University,   University   of   Waterloo,   University   of  Ontatrio,  and  University  of  Toronto)  discussed  a  range  of  topics  that  included;  an  overview  of  each  of  our  off-­‐campus   operaIons,   funding   models,   neighbourhood  relaIons,   student   engagement,   RTA   awareness,   and  development  and  standards.

This  group  (which  conInues  to  grow!)  has  allowed  off-­‐campus  housing  professionals  to  stay  connected  to  one  another  and  to  share  perInent   informaIon  about  the  evolving   world   of   off-­‐campus   housing.   By   conInuing  these  efforts,  we  have  the  opportunity  to  create  even  closer   connecIons   with   each   other   and   to   conInue  developing  strong  partnerships  among  our  insItuIons.  As   you   may   remember   from   the   off-­‐campus   housing  ResTalk   at   the   Spring   Conference,   the   connecIon  between  on  and  off-­‐campus  housing  is  something  that  can   be   used   to   everyone’s   advantage   and  will   have   a  posiIve   impact   on   those   who   maZer   most:   our  students.  By  sharing  best  pracIces  among  on-­‐  and  off-­‐campus  professionals,  it  will  allow  us  to  provide  further  educaIon   and   awareness   regarding   off-­‐campus  developments.   As  the  winter  term  comes  into  full  swing,  many  of  our  residence   students  will   begin   to   consider   their   upper  year   housing   opIons.   As   our   campus   partnerships  conInue  to  grow  and  become  stronger,  we  are  able  to  provide  more  effecIve  support  to  our  students  as  they  consider  the  move  off-­‐campus.  If   you   would   like   to   learn   more   about   the   topics  menIoned  above  or   if   you   know  of   someone   in   your  off-­‐campus   operaIon   that   might   be   interested   in  joining  this  community,  please  connect  with  me.  

Off Campus Housing Knowledge Community

Paul  ReifensteinCo-­‐ordinator,  Off-­‐Campus  Living  ProgramsUniversity  of  Waterloo  

Page 21: The Pulse January 2015

- 21 -

In Depth: Ontario universities and colleges tackle campus sexual violence

In   wake   of   a   recent   series   of   high   profile   cases   of  sexual   harassment,   and   in   light   of   a   December  Toronto   Star   inves;ga;on   into   the   lack   of   formal  policies   to   respond   to   on-­‐campus   sexual   assault,  Ontario’s   universi;es   and   colleges   have   recently  taken  addi;onal  steps   to  address  and  combat  sexual  violence  on  their  campuses.    

Late  in  December,  according  to  an  arIcle  in  the  Star,  the  presidents  of  Ontario’s  20  publicly  funded  universiIes  unanimously  agreed  to  a  range  of  measured  aimed  to  combat  sexual  violence  on  campus.  The  measures  agreed  to  include:  

•   Review  their  exisIng  policies  against  a  respected  provincial  guide  created  by  the  Ontario  Women’s  Directorate  in  2013,  which  stresses  the  importance  of  a  special  policy  to  handle  sexual  violence.  

•   Establish  a  reference  group  composed  of  academics,  student  affairs  leaders,  chief  operaIng  officers  and  legal  counsel  that  will  share  best  pracIces  for  addressing  sexual  assault  on  campus  and  make  recommendaIons.  The  group’s  first  meeIng  was  Dec.  18.  

•   Work  with  Ontario  colleges  and  hold  a  joint  conference  in  February  to  discuss  sexual  violence  on  campus.  Student  leaders  will  be  involved  in  helping  plan  that  conference  and  set  the  agenda.  

The  Star  quotes  Wilfrid  Laurier  president  Max  Blouw,  who  says,  “It  is  such  complicated  issue  and  so  many  people  are  hurt  that  we  have  to  take  it  seriously.”  

For  its  part,  Colleges  Ontario—the  advocacy  organizaIon  for  the  province’s  24  colleges  of  applied  arts  and  technology—announced  in  November  its  intent  to  create  a  province-­‐wide  policy  on  campus  sexual  assault.    

According  to  Loyalist  College  President  Maureen  Piercey,  quoted  in  an  arIcle  in  the  Belleville  Intelligencer,  “We’ve  got  individual  policies  and  pracIces,  why  don’t  we  take  a  group  approach,  a  provincial  approach  of  the  best  pracIces  that  everybody  is  employing  –  bring  all  social  media  and  web-­‐based  resources  we  have  –  to  see  how  we  can  do  the  best  possible  job.”  

The  new  commitments  come  on  the  heels  of  a  three-­‐month  Toronto  Star  invesIgaIon  into  how  Canadian  post-­‐secondary  insItuIons  are  dealing  with  sexual  violence  on  their  campuses.  The  invesIgaIon  found  that  only  nine  of  78  publicly  funded  universiIes  across  Canada  had  as  special  sexual  assault  policy,  considered  by  many  experts  as  a  necessary  step  because  it  clearly  outlines  rights  and  responsibiliIes.  The  Star  noted  that  at  the  Ime  of  the  invesIgaIon,  none  of  the  24  public  colleges  in  Ontario  had  a  special  policy  in  place.  

OACUHOResearch with  Trevor  CorkumOACUHO  Research  Writer    

Page 22: The Pulse January 2015

- 22 -

The  following  is  a  snapshot  of  recent  news  stories  at  postsecondary   ins;tu;ons   in   Ontario   highligh;ng  par;cular   issues   of   Indigenous   students,   staff   and  faculty.  

Ontario   ins;tu;ons   working   to   include   Indigenous  perspec;ves  

Two   Ontario   post-­‐secondary   insItuIons   have  been  conInuing  efforts  to  include  the  perspecIves  of  First   NaIons,   MéIs,   and   Inuit   peoples.   Sudbury’s  LaurenIan   University   has   been   acIvely   trying   to  increase   the   number   of   Indigenous   faculty  members  at   the   university,   and   has   surpassed   its   original  recruitment  goal  by  double.  “To  level  the  playing  field,  if  you  will,   it's  really  important  that  Aboriginal  faculty  are   seen   in   the   university   across   a   variety   of  disciplines,”   said   AVP   Academics   and   Indigenous  programs   Sheila   Cote   Meek.   In   OZawa,   Carleton  University   is   building   on   recent   iniIaIves   and  introducing  two  new  graduate  diplomas  in  Indigenous  Policy   and  AdministraIon   (IPA)   and   an   IPA   stream   in  the  MA   in   Public   AdministraIon.   The   new   programs  include   classes   in   Indigenous   history,   policy,  community  development,  and  leadership. Source:  Academica CICan   launches   Indigenous   Educa;on   Protocol   for  colleges  and  ins;tutes  

Colleges   and   InsItutes   Canada   (CICan)   has  announced   the   launch   of   its   groundbreaking   report  Indigenous   EducaIon   Protocol   for   Colleges   and  InsItutes.   The   document   supports   the   work   of  colleges  and   insItuIons  across  Canada   in   supporIng  Indigenous  educaIon  and  provides  a  vision  of  how  to  improve   service   and   good   pracIces   for   Indigenous  students.   Included   in   the   document   are   seven  principles  that  CICan  has   idenIfied  as  being  essenIal  to  meeIng  Indigenous  peoples’  learning  needs  and  to  support   self-­‐determinaIon   and   socio-­‐economic  

development   of   Indigenous   communiIes.   The  Protocol   was   developed   by   CICan’s   Indigenous  EducaIon   CommiZee,   comprising   college   and  insItute   representaIves   from   across   the   provinces  and   territories,   as  well   as   through   consultaIons  held  at   the  Serving   Indigenous   Learners  and  CommuniIes  Symposium  in  December  2014,  and  the  CICan  annual  conferences  in  2013  and  2014.  CICan  has  invited  all  of  the  137  colleges,   insItutes,  polytechnics,  and  CEGEPs  it   represents   to   sign   the   protocol;   approximately   25  signed  during  the  launch. Source:  Colleges  and  InsAtutes  CanadaNeed   to   take   the   “long   view”   when   it   comes   to  Indigenous  educa;on  

In   a   recent   submission   to   Academic   MaZers,  Indigenous  teacher-­‐educaIon  pioneer  lolehawk  Laura  Buker  writes  that  it  is  imperaIve  that  PSE  insItuIons  “take   the   long   view”   on   Indigenous   educaIon,  reflecIng   and   engaging   in   dialogue   on   the   future  rather  than  the  present.  According  to  a  recent  arIcle  in  Academica,  Buker  notes  that  many  PSE  programs—and   specifically   teacher-­‐educaIon   programs—have  begun   to   include   more   Indigenous   ways   of   knowing  and   perspecIves.   Buker   says   that   “a   renewed  commitment   from   our   universiIes   to   move  Indigenous   educaIon   goals   and   programs   forward   is  necessary   as   we   move   into   the   next   decade.”   She  points   to   four   areas   that   can   help   renew   Aboriginal  educaIon   goals:   change,   respect   for   Indigenous  knowledge,   opening   doors   for   community  partnership,   and   recogniIon   of   the   new   storytellers.  “The   long   view   towards   Indigenous  EducaIon   is   that  change   takes   Ime   to   gain   momentum,   to   get   the  wheels   in  moIon,  and   to  keep  going   forward.  This   is  not   the  moment   in  history   to   reduce   funding   for   the  aspects   of   Indigenous   educaIon   that   are   necessary  for  growth  and  capacity  building.”  Sources:  Academica/Academic  Ma>ers  

In Summary: Incorporating Indigenous Perspectives

Page 23: The Pulse January 2015

Ontario Association of College and University Housing Officers312 Oakwood Crt, Newmarket Ontario, L3Y 3C8 Telephone: 905-954-0102 Fax: 905-895-1630