15
The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011

Kees van Boven

Page 2: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Research questions

1.How is the quality of the recording of medical data in the EMR of general practices in the region Twente?

2. Are there differences in the quality of registration between the general practices in the region Twente? Do these differences have a connection with the used EMR?

Page 3: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

• Promedico ASP (Blue)• Medicom (Yellow)• Mira (Green)• MicroHIS 8.5.2 (Red)

Page 4: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Indicators of the EMR scan GPs

Indicators of the completeness of medical history

Indicators of structured work in the medical journal

Indicators for the completeness and timeliness of the medication list

Indicators of medication monitoring

Page 5: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

General Practitioner Practice Nurse (POH) Doctor assistant Fysiotherapist0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Percentage

Percentage

Use and sharing of EMR data

Page 6: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Out of Hour Fysiotherapist Pharmacy Hospital Lab/Diagnostic Center0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Percentage

Percentage

exchange of electronic data

Page 7: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Average number of active defined episodes per patient per practice

Page 8: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Percentage of all problem episodes (following the definition of the Dutch College) that actually got a problem status.

Page 9: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Percentage of all general episodes that defined a meaningful ICPC code

Page 10: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Sub-encounters linked to an episode

Page 11: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Incorrectly identified as "current medication"

Page 12: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

The percentage of prescriptions that is linked to a “defined” episode.

Page 13: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Current medication that is linked to an episode with a significant ICPC code

Page 14: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Drug allergy or intolerance

Page 15: The quality of the electronic patient records of general practitioners measured, NIVEL 2011 Kees van Boven

Contraindication