205
Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 1 / 25

Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016

• Ideal refractive surface

• Fresnel lenses and zone plates

• Research papers on refraction

• Homework #2 solutions

Homework Assignment #03:Chapter 3: 1, 3, 4, 6, 8due Wednesday, September 05, 2016

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 1 / 25

Page 2: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016

• Ideal refractive surface

• Fresnel lenses and zone plates

• Research papers on refraction

• Homework #2 solutions

Homework Assignment #03:Chapter 3: 1, 3, 4, 6, 8due Wednesday, September 05, 2016

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 1 / 25

Page 3: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016

• Ideal refractive surface

• Fresnel lenses and zone plates

• Research papers on refraction

• Homework #2 solutions

Homework Assignment #03:Chapter 3: 1, 3, 4, 6, 8due Wednesday, September 05, 2016

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 1 / 25

Page 4: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016

• Ideal refractive surface

• Fresnel lenses and zone plates

• Research papers on refraction

• Homework #2 solutions

Homework Assignment #03:Chapter 3: 1, 3, 4, 6, 8due Wednesday, September 05, 2016

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 1 / 25

Page 5: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016

• Ideal refractive surface

• Fresnel lenses and zone plates

• Research papers on refraction

• Homework #2 solutions

Homework Assignment #03:Chapter 3: 1, 3, 4, 6, 8due Wednesday, September 05, 2016

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 1 / 25

Page 6: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016

• Ideal refractive surface

• Fresnel lenses and zone plates

• Research papers on refraction

• Homework #2 solutions

Homework Assignment #03:Chapter 3: 1, 3, 4, 6, 8due Wednesday, September 05, 2016

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 1 / 25

Page 7: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ ολ (1+δ)ο

∆x

A’A

B

B’

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ = h′(x)

λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 8: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ ολ (1+δ)ο

∆x

A’A

B

B’

α

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.

Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ = h′(x)

λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 9: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ 0 λ (1+δ)0

∆x

A’A

B

B’

C

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ = h′(x)

λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 10: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ 0 λ (1+δ)0

∆x

A’A

B

B’

C

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ = h′(x)

λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 11: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ 0 λ (1+δ)0

∆x

A’A

B

B’

C

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x

−→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ = h′(x)

λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 12: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ 0 λ (1+δ)0

∆x

A’A

B

B’

C

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ = h′(x)

λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 13: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ 0 λ (1+δ)0

∆x

A’A

B

B’

C

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ = h′(x)

λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 14: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ 0 λ (1+δ)0

∆x

A’A

B

B’

C

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x

= h′(x)δ = h′(x)λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 15: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ 0 λ (1+δ)0

∆x

A’A

B

B’

C

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ

= h′(x)λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 16: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ 0 λ (1+δ)0

∆x

A’A

B

B’

C

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ

= h′(x)λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 17: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

α

+x0

h(x)

λ 0 λ (1+δ)0

∆x

A’A

B

B’

C

The wave exits thematerial into vacuumthrough a surface ofprofile h(x), and istwisted by an angle α.Follow the path of twopoints on the wave-front, A and A′ as theypropagate to B andB ′.

from the AA′B ′ trian-gle

and from the BCB ′ tri-angle

using Λ = λ0/δ

λ0 (1 + δ) = h′(x)∆x −→ ∆x ≈ λ0h′(x)

α(x) ≈ λ0δ

∆x= h′(x)δ = h′(x)

λ0Λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 2 / 25

Page 18: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

If the desired focal length of this lens is f ,the wave must be redirected at an anglewhich depends on the distance from theoptical axis

α(x) =x

f

combining, we have

λ0h′(x)

Λ=

x

f−→ h′(x)

Λ=

x

f λ0

this can be directly integrated

h(x)

Λ=

x2

2f λ0=

[x√

2f λ0

]2

x0

α(x)f

a parabola is the ideal surfaceshape for focusing by refrac-tion

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 3 / 25

Page 19: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

If the desired focal length of this lens is f ,the wave must be redirected at an anglewhich depends on the distance from theoptical axis

α(x) =x

f

combining, we have

λ0h′(x)

Λ=

x

f−→ h′(x)

Λ=

x

f λ0

this can be directly integrated

h(x)

Λ=

x2

2f λ0=

[x√

2f λ0

]2

x0

α(x)f

a parabola is the ideal surfaceshape for focusing by refrac-tion

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 3 / 25

Page 20: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

If the desired focal length of this lens is f ,the wave must be redirected at an anglewhich depends on the distance from theoptical axis

α(x) =x

f

combining, we have

λ0h′(x)

Λ=

x

f

−→ h′(x)

Λ=

x

f λ0

this can be directly integrated

h(x)

Λ=

x2

2f λ0=

[x√

2f λ0

]2

x0

α(x)f

a parabola is the ideal surfaceshape for focusing by refrac-tion

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 3 / 25

Page 21: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

If the desired focal length of this lens is f ,the wave must be redirected at an anglewhich depends on the distance from theoptical axis

α(x) =x

f

combining, we have

λ0h′(x)

Λ=

x

f−→ h′(x)

Λ=

x

f λ0

this can be directly integrated

h(x)

Λ=

x2

2f λ0=

[x√

2f λ0

]2

x0

α(x)f

a parabola is the ideal surfaceshape for focusing by refrac-tion

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 3 / 25

Page 22: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

If the desired focal length of this lens is f ,the wave must be redirected at an anglewhich depends on the distance from theoptical axis

α(x) =x

f

combining, we have

λ0h′(x)

Λ=

x

f−→ h′(x)

Λ=

x

f λ0

this can be directly integrated

h(x)

Λ=

x2

2f λ0=

[x√

2f λ0

]2

x0

α(x)f

a parabola is the ideal surfaceshape for focusing by refrac-tion

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 3 / 25

Page 23: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

If the desired focal length of this lens is f ,the wave must be redirected at an anglewhich depends on the distance from theoptical axis

α(x) =x

f

combining, we have

λ0h′(x)

Λ=

x

f−→ h′(x)

Λ=

x

f λ0

this can be directly integrated

h(x)

Λ=

x2

2f λ0

=

[x√

2f λ0

]2

x0

α(x)f

a parabola is the ideal surfaceshape for focusing by refrac-tion

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 3 / 25

Page 24: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

If the desired focal length of this lens is f ,the wave must be redirected at an anglewhich depends on the distance from theoptical axis

α(x) =x

f

combining, we have

λ0h′(x)

Λ=

x

f−→ h′(x)

Λ=

x

f λ0

this can be directly integrated

h(x)

Λ=

x2

2f λ0=

[x√

2f λ0

]2x0

α(x)f

a parabola is the ideal surfaceshape for focusing by refrac-tion

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 3 / 25

Page 25: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Ideal interface profile

If the desired focal length of this lens is f ,the wave must be redirected at an anglewhich depends on the distance from theoptical axis

α(x) =x

f

combining, we have

λ0h′(x)

Λ=

x

f−→ h′(x)

Λ=

x

f λ0

this can be directly integrated

h(x)

Λ=

x2

2f λ0=

[x√

2f λ0

]2x0

α(x)f

a parabola is the ideal surfaceshape for focusing by refrac-tion

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 3 / 25

Page 26: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)=

1

x2

h(x)or alternatively f =

1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2 and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2 so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 27: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)

=1

x2

h(x)or alternatively f =

1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2 and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2 so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 28: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)=

1

x2

h(x)

or alternatively f =1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2 and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2 so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 29: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)=

1

x2

h(x)or alternatively f =

1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2 and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2 so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 30: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)=

1

x2

h(x)or alternatively f =

1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2 and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2 so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 31: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)=

1

x2

h(x)or alternatively f =

1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2

and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2 so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 32: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)=

1

x2

h(x)or alternatively f =

1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2 and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2 so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 33: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)=

1

x2

h(x)or alternatively f =

1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2 and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2

so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 34: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)=

1

x2

h(x)or alternatively f =

1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2 and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2 so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 35: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focal length of circular lens

From the previous expression for the ideal parabolic surface, the focallength can be written in terms of the surface profile.

f =x2Λ

2λ0h(x)=

1

x2

h(x)or alternatively f =

1

δ

x

h′(x)

If the surface is a circle instead of a parabola

h(x) =√R2 − x2 and for x � R h(x) ≈ R

(1− 1

2

x2

R2

)

x2 = R2 − h2(x) ≈ R2 so we have f ≈ R

for N circular lenses

fn ≈R

2Nδ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 4 / 25

Page 36: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focussing by a beryllium lens

2R

d

unit lensf

For 50 holes of radius R = 1mm in beryllium (Be) at E = 10keV, we cancalculate the focal length, knowing δ = 3.41× 10−6

fN =R

2Nδ=

1× 10−3m

2(50)(3.41× 10−6)= 2.93m

depending on the wall thickness of the lenslets, the transmission can be upto 74%

H.R. Beguiristain, J.T. Cremer, M.A. Piestrup, C.K. Gary, and R.H. Pantell, Optics Letters, 27, 778 (2007).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 5 / 25

Page 37: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focussing by a beryllium lens

2R

d

unit lensf

For 50 holes of radius R = 1mm in beryllium (Be) at E = 10keV, we cancalculate the focal length, knowing δ = 3.41× 10−6

fN =R

2Nδ

=1× 10−3m

2(50)(3.41× 10−6)= 2.93m

depending on the wall thickness of the lenslets, the transmission can be upto 74%

H.R. Beguiristain, J.T. Cremer, M.A. Piestrup, C.K. Gary, and R.H. Pantell, Optics Letters, 27, 778 (2007).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 5 / 25

Page 38: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focussing by a beryllium lens

2R

d

unit lensf

For 50 holes of radius R = 1mm in beryllium (Be) at E = 10keV, we cancalculate the focal length, knowing δ = 3.41× 10−6

fN =R

2Nδ=

1× 10−3m

2(50)(3.41× 10−6)

= 2.93m

depending on the wall thickness of the lenslets, the transmission can be upto 74%

H.R. Beguiristain, J.T. Cremer, M.A. Piestrup, C.K. Gary, and R.H. Pantell, Optics Letters, 27, 778 (2007).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 5 / 25

Page 39: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focussing by a beryllium lens

2R

d

unit lensf

For 50 holes of radius R = 1mm in beryllium (Be) at E = 10keV, we cancalculate the focal length, knowing δ = 3.41× 10−6

fN =R

2Nδ=

1× 10−3m

2(50)(3.41× 10−6)= 2.93m

depending on the wall thickness of the lenslets, the transmission can be upto 74%

H.R. Beguiristain, J.T. Cremer, M.A. Piestrup, C.K. Gary, and R.H. Pantell, Optics Letters, 27, 778 (2007).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 5 / 25

Page 40: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Focussing by a beryllium lens

2R

d

unit lensf

For 50 holes of radius R = 1mm in beryllium (Be) at E = 10keV, we cancalculate the focal length, knowing δ = 3.41× 10−6

fN =R

2Nδ=

1× 10−3m

2(50)(3.41× 10−6)= 2.93m

depending on the wall thickness of the lenslets, the transmission can be upto 74%

H.R. Beguiristain, J.T. Cremer, M.A. Piestrup, C.K. Gary, and R.H. Pantell, Optics Letters, 27, 778 (2007).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 5 / 25

Page 41: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Variable focal length CRL

The compound refractive lenses (CRL) are useful for fixed focus but aredifficult to use if a variable focal distance and a long focal length isrequired.

Start with a 2 hole CRL. Rotate byan angle χ about vertical axis giv-ing an effective change in the num-ber of “lenses” by a factor 1/ cosχ.

at E = 5.5keV and χ = 0◦, heightis over 120µm

At χ = 30◦, it is under 50µm

Optimal focus is 20µm at χ = 40◦

B. Adams and C. Rose-Petruck, “X-ray focusing scheme with continuously variable lens”, J. Synchrotron Radiation 22, 16-22

(2015).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 6 / 25

Page 42: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Variable focal length CRL

The compound refractive lenses (CRL) are useful for fixed focus but aredifficult to use if a variable focal distance and a long focal length isrequired.

Start with a 2 hole CRL.

Rotate byan angle χ about vertical axis giv-ing an effective change in the num-ber of “lenses” by a factor 1/ cosχ.

at E = 5.5keV and χ = 0◦, heightis over 120µm

At χ = 30◦, it is under 50µm

Optimal focus is 20µm at χ = 40◦

B. Adams and C. Rose-Petruck, “X-ray focusing scheme with continuously variable lens”, J. Synchrotron Radiation 22, 16-22

(2015).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 6 / 25

Page 43: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Variable focal length CRL

The compound refractive lenses (CRL) are useful for fixed focus but aredifficult to use if a variable focal distance and a long focal length isrequired.

Start with a 2 hole CRL. Rotate byan angle χ about vertical axis

giv-ing an effective change in the num-ber of “lenses” by a factor 1/ cosχ.

at E = 5.5keV and χ = 0◦, heightis over 120µm

At χ = 30◦, it is under 50µm

Optimal focus is 20µm at χ = 40◦

B. Adams and C. Rose-Petruck, “X-ray focusing scheme with continuously variable lens”, J. Synchrotron Radiation 22, 16-22

(2015).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 6 / 25

Page 44: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Variable focal length CRL

The compound refractive lenses (CRL) are useful for fixed focus but aredifficult to use if a variable focal distance and a long focal length isrequired.

Start with a 2 hole CRL. Rotate byan angle χ about vertical axis giv-ing an effective change in the num-ber of “lenses” by a factor 1/ cosχ.

at E = 5.5keV and χ = 0◦, heightis over 120µm

At χ = 30◦, it is under 50µm

Optimal focus is 20µm at χ = 40◦

B. Adams and C. Rose-Petruck, “X-ray focusing scheme with continuously variable lens”, J. Synchrotron Radiation 22, 16-22

(2015).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 6 / 25

Page 45: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Variable focal length CRL

The compound refractive lenses (CRL) are useful for fixed focus but aredifficult to use if a variable focal distance and a long focal length isrequired.Start with a 2 hole CRL. Rotate byan angle χ about vertical axis giv-ing an effective change in the num-ber of “lenses” by a factor 1/ cosχ.

at E = 5.5keV and χ = 0◦, heightis over 120µm

At χ = 30◦, it is under 50µm

Optimal focus is 20µm at χ = 40◦

B. Adams and C. Rose-Petruck, “X-ray focusing scheme with continuously variable lens”, J. Synchrotron Radiation 22, 16-22

(2015).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 6 / 25

Page 46: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Variable focal length CRL

The compound refractive lenses (CRL) are useful for fixed focus but aredifficult to use if a variable focal distance and a long focal length isrequired.Start with a 2 hole CRL. Rotate byan angle χ about vertical axis giv-ing an effective change in the num-ber of “lenses” by a factor 1/ cosχ.

at E = 5.5keV and χ = 0◦, heightis over 120µm

At χ = 30◦, it is under 50µm

Optimal focus is 20µm at χ = 40◦

B. Adams and C. Rose-Petruck, “X-ray focusing scheme with continuously variable lens”, J. Synchrotron Radiation 22, 16-22

(2015).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 6 / 25

Page 47: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Variable focal length CRL

The compound refractive lenses (CRL) are useful for fixed focus but aredifficult to use if a variable focal distance and a long focal length isrequired.Start with a 2 hole CRL. Rotate byan angle χ about vertical axis giv-ing an effective change in the num-ber of “lenses” by a factor 1/ cosχ.

at E = 5.5keV and χ = 0◦, heightis over 120µm

At χ = 30◦, it is under 50µm

Optimal focus is 20µm at χ = 40◦

B. Adams and C. Rose-Petruck, “X-ray focusing scheme with continuously variable lens”, J. Synchrotron Radiation 22, 16-22

(2015).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 6 / 25

Page 48: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Alligator-type lenses

Perhaps one of the most original x-ray lenses has been made by using oldvinyl records in an “alligator” configuration.

Bjorn Cederstrom et al., “Focusing hard X-rays with old LPs”, Nature 404, 951 (2000).

This design has also beenused to make lenses out oflithium metal.

E.M. Dufresne et al., “Lithium metal for x-ray refractive optics”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 4085 (2001).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 7 / 25

Page 49: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Alligator-type lenses

Perhaps one of the most original x-ray lenses has been made by using oldvinyl records in an “alligator” configuration.

Bjorn Cederstrom et al., “Focusing hard X-rays with old LPs”, Nature 404, 951 (2000).

This design has also beenused to make lenses out oflithium metal.

E.M. Dufresne et al., “Lithium metal for x-ray refractive optics”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 4085 (2001).

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 7 / 25

Page 50: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

How to make a Fresnel lens

The ideal refracting lens has a parabolicshape (actually elliptical) but this is imprac-tical to make.

h(x) = Λ

(x√

2λo f

)2

when h(x) = 100Λ ∼ 1000µm

x = 10√

2λo f ∼ 100µm

aspect ratio too large for a stable structureand absorption would be too large!

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 8 / 25

Page 51: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

How to make a Fresnel lens

The ideal refracting lens has a parabolicshape (actually elliptical) but this is imprac-tical to make.

h(x) = Λ

(x√

2λo f

)2

when h(x) = 100Λ ∼ 1000µm

x = 10√

2λo f ∼ 100µm

aspect ratio too large for a stable structureand absorption would be too large!

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 8 / 25

Page 52: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

How to make a Fresnel lens

The ideal refracting lens has a parabolicshape (actually elliptical) but this is imprac-tical to make.

h(x) = Λ

(x√

2λo f

)2

when h(x) = 100Λ ∼ 1000µm

x = 10√

2λo f ∼ 100µm

aspect ratio too large for a stable structureand absorption would be too large!

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 8 / 25

Page 53: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

How to make a Fresnel lens

The ideal refracting lens has a parabolicshape (actually elliptical) but this is imprac-tical to make.

h(x) = Λ

(x√

2λo f

)2

when h(x) = 100Λ ∼ 1000µm

x = 10√

2λo f ∼ 100µm

aspect ratio too large for a stable structureand absorption would be too large!

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 8 / 25

Page 54: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

How to make a Fresnel lens

The ideal refracting lens has a parabolicshape (actually elliptical) but this is imprac-tical to make.

h(x) = Λ

(x√

2λo f

)2

when h(x) = 100Λ ∼ 1000µm

x = 10√

2λo f ∼ 100µm

aspect ratio too large for a stable structureand absorption would be too large!

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 8 / 25

Page 55: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

How to make a Fresnel lens

Λ

7ΛMark off the longitudinal zones (of thicknessΛ) where the waves inside and outside thematerial are in phase.

Each block of thickness Λ serves nopurpose for refraction but only attenuatesthe wave.

This material can be removed and theremaining material collapsed to producea Fresnel lens which has the same opticalproperties as the parabolic lens as long asf � NΛ where N is the number of zones.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 9 / 25

Page 56: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

How to make a Fresnel lens

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 Mark off the longitudinal zones (of thicknessΛ) where the waves inside and outside thematerial are in phase.

Each block of thickness Λ serves nopurpose for refraction but only attenuatesthe wave.

This material can be removed and theremaining material collapsed to producea Fresnel lens which has the same opticalproperties as the parabolic lens as long asf � NΛ where N is the number of zones.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 9 / 25

Page 57: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

How to make a Fresnel lens

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 Mark off the longitudinal zones (of thicknessΛ) where the waves inside and outside thematerial are in phase.

Each block of thickness Λ serves nopurpose for refraction but only attenuatesthe wave.

This material can be removed and theremaining material collapsed to producea Fresnel lens which has the same opticalproperties as the parabolic lens as long asf � NΛ where N is the number of zones.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 9 / 25

Page 58: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

The outermost zones become very small andthus limit the overall aperture of the zoneplate. The dimensions of outermost zone, Ncan be calculated by first defining a scaledheight and lateral dimension

ν =h(x)

Λξ =

x√2λo f

Since ν = ξ2, the position of the Nth zoneis ξN =

√N and the scaled width of the Nth

(outermost) zone is

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 10 / 25

Page 59: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

The outermost zones become very small andthus limit the overall aperture of the zoneplate. The dimensions of outermost zone, Ncan be calculated by first defining a scaledheight and lateral dimension

ν =h(x)

Λ

ξ =x√

2λo f

Since ν = ξ2, the position of the Nth zoneis ξN =

√N and the scaled width of the Nth

(outermost) zone is

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 10 / 25

Page 60: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

The outermost zones become very small andthus limit the overall aperture of the zoneplate. The dimensions of outermost zone, Ncan be calculated by first defining a scaledheight and lateral dimension

ν =h(x)

Λξ =

x√2λo f

Since ν = ξ2, the position of the Nth zoneis ξN =

√N and the scaled width of the Nth

(outermost) zone is

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 10 / 25

Page 61: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

The outermost zones become very small andthus limit the overall aperture of the zoneplate. The dimensions of outermost zone, Ncan be calculated by first defining a scaledheight and lateral dimension

ν =h(x)

Λξ =

x√2λo f

Since ν = ξ2, the position of the Nth zoneis ξN =

√N and the scaled width of the Nth

(outermost) zone is

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 10 / 25

Page 62: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

The outermost zones become very small andthus limit the overall aperture of the zoneplate. The dimensions of outermost zone, Ncan be calculated by first defining a scaledheight and lateral dimension

ν =h(x)

Λξ =

x√2λo f

Since ν = ξ2, the position of the Nth zoneis ξN =

√N and the scaled width of the Nth

(outermost) zone is

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 10 / 25

Page 63: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

=√N

(1−

√1− 1

N

)

≈√N

(1−

[1− 1

2N

])∆ξN ≈

1

2√N

The diameter of the entire lens is thus

2ξN = 2√N =

1

∆ξN

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 11 / 25

Page 64: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

=√N

(1−

√1− 1

N

)

≈√N

(1−

[1− 1

2N

])∆ξN ≈

1

2√N

The diameter of the entire lens is thus

2ξN = 2√N =

1

∆ξN

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 11 / 25

Page 65: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

=√N

(1−

√1− 1

N

)

≈√N

(1−

[1− 1

2N

])

∆ξN ≈1

2√N

The diameter of the entire lens is thus

2ξN = 2√N =

1

∆ξN

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 11 / 25

Page 66: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

=√N

(1−

√1− 1

N

)

≈√N

(1−

[1− 1

2N

])∆ξN ≈

1

2√N

The diameter of the entire lens is thus

2ξN = 2√N =

1

∆ξN

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 11 / 25

Page 67: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens dimensions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

∆ξN = ξN − ξN−1 =√N −

√N − 1

=√N

(1−

√1− 1

N

)

≈√N

(1−

[1− 1

2N

])∆ξN ≈

1

2√N

The diameter of the entire lens is thus

2ξN = 2√N =

1

∆ξN

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 11 / 25

Page 68: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens example

In terms of the unscaled variables

∆xN = ∆ξN√

2λo f

=

√λo f

2N

dN = 2ξN =

√2λo f

∆ξN= 2√N√

2λo f =√

2Nλo f

If we take

λo = 1A = 1× 10−10m

f = 50cm = 0.5m

N = 100

∆xN = 5× 10−7m = 500nm dN = 2× 10−4m = 100µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 12 / 25

Page 69: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens example

In terms of the unscaled variables

∆xN = ∆ξN√

2λo f =

√λo f

2N

dN = 2ξN =

√2λo f

∆ξN= 2√N√

2λo f =√

2Nλo f

If we take

λo = 1A = 1× 10−10m

f = 50cm = 0.5m

N = 100

∆xN = 5× 10−7m = 500nm dN = 2× 10−4m = 100µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 12 / 25

Page 70: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens example

In terms of the unscaled variables

∆xN = ∆ξN√

2λo f =

√λo f

2N

dN = 2ξN

=

√2λo f

∆ξN= 2√N√

2λo f =√

2Nλo f

If we take

λo = 1A = 1× 10−10m

f = 50cm = 0.5m

N = 100

∆xN = 5× 10−7m = 500nm dN = 2× 10−4m = 100µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 12 / 25

Page 71: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens example

In terms of the unscaled variables

∆xN = ∆ξN√

2λo f =

√λo f

2N

dN = 2ξN =

√2λo f

∆ξN

= 2√N√

2λo f =√

2Nλo f

If we take

λo = 1A = 1× 10−10m

f = 50cm = 0.5m

N = 100

∆xN = 5× 10−7m = 500nm dN = 2× 10−4m = 100µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 12 / 25

Page 72: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens example

In terms of the unscaled variables

∆xN = ∆ξN√

2λo f =

√λo f

2N

dN = 2ξN =

√2λo f

∆ξN= 2√N√

2λo f =√

2Nλo f

If we take

λo = 1A = 1× 10−10m

f = 50cm = 0.5m

N = 100

∆xN = 5× 10−7m = 500nm dN = 2× 10−4m = 100µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 12 / 25

Page 73: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens example

In terms of the unscaled variables

∆xN = ∆ξN√

2λo f =

√λo f

2N

dN = 2ξN =

√2λo f

∆ξN= 2√N√

2λo f =√

2Nλo f

If we take

λo = 1A = 1× 10−10m

f = 50cm = 0.5m

N = 100

∆xN = 5× 10−7m = 500nm dN = 2× 10−4m = 100µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 12 / 25

Page 74: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens example

In terms of the unscaled variables

∆xN = ∆ξN√

2λo f =

√λo f

2N

dN = 2ξN =

√2λo f

∆ξN= 2√N√

2λo f =√

2Nλo f

If we take

λo = 1A = 1× 10−10m

f = 50cm = 0.5m

N = 100

∆xN = 5× 10−7m = 500nm

dN = 2× 10−4m = 100µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 12 / 25

Page 75: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Fresnel lens example

In terms of the unscaled variables

∆xN = ∆ξN√

2λo f =

√λo f

2N

dN = 2ξN =

√2λo f

∆ξN= 2√N√

2λo f =√

2Nλo f

If we take

λo = 1A = 1× 10−10m

f = 50cm = 0.5m

N = 100

∆xN = 5× 10−7m = 500nm dN = 2× 10−4m = 100µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 12 / 25

Page 76: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Making a Fresnel zone plate

Λ

Λ/2

The specific shape required for a zone plateis difficult to fabricate, consequently, itis convenient to approximate the nearlytriangular zones with a rectangular profile.

In practice, since the outermost zonesare very small, zone plates are generallyfabricated as alternating zones (rings for2D) of materials with a large Z-contrast,such as Au/Si or W/C.

This kind of zone plate is not as effi-cient as a true Fresnel lens would be in thex-ray regime. Nevertheless, efficiencies upto 35% have been achieved.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 13 / 25

Page 77: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Making a Fresnel zone plate

Λ

Λ/2

The specific shape required for a zone plateis difficult to fabricate, consequently, itis convenient to approximate the nearlytriangular zones with a rectangular profile.

In practice, since the outermost zonesare very small, zone plates are generallyfabricated as alternating zones (rings for2D) of materials with a large Z-contrast,such as Au/Si or W/C.

This kind of zone plate is not as effi-cient as a true Fresnel lens would be in thex-ray regime. Nevertheless, efficiencies upto 35% have been achieved.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 13 / 25

Page 78: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Making a Fresnel zone plate

Λ

Λ/2

The specific shape required for a zone plateis difficult to fabricate, consequently, itis convenient to approximate the nearlytriangular zones with a rectangular profile.

In practice, since the outermost zonesare very small, zone plates are generallyfabricated as alternating zones (rings for2D) of materials with a large Z-contrast,such as Au/Si or W/C.

This kind of zone plate is not as effi-cient as a true Fresnel lens would be in thex-ray regime. Nevertheless, efficiencies upto 35% have been achieved.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 13 / 25

Page 79: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Zone plate fabrication

Making high aspect ratio zone plates is challenging but a new process hasbeen developed to make plates with an aspect ratio as high as 25.

Start with Ultra nano crystallinediamond (UNCD) films on SiN.Coat with hydrogen silsesquioxane(HSQ). Pattern and develop theHSQ layer. Reactive ion etch theUNCD to the substrate. Plate withgold to make final zone plate.

The whole 150nm diameter zoneplate

Detail view of outer zones

SiN

UNCD

HSQ

M. Wojick et al., “High Aspect Ratio Zone Plate Fabrication Using a Bilayer Mold”, EIBPN 2011.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 14 / 25

Page 80: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Zone plate fabrication

Making high aspect ratio zone plates is challenging but a new process hasbeen developed to make plates with an aspect ratio as high as 25.

Start with Ultra nano crystallinediamond (UNCD) films on SiN.

Coat with hydrogen silsesquioxane(HSQ). Pattern and develop theHSQ layer. Reactive ion etch theUNCD to the substrate. Plate withgold to make final zone plate.

The whole 150nm diameter zoneplate

Detail view of outer zones

SiN

UNCD

HSQ

M. Wojick et al., “High Aspect Ratio Zone Plate Fabrication Using a Bilayer Mold”, EIBPN 2011.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 14 / 25

Page 81: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Zone plate fabrication

Making high aspect ratio zone plates is challenging but a new process hasbeen developed to make plates with an aspect ratio as high as 25.

Start with Ultra nano crystallinediamond (UNCD) films on SiN.Coat with hydrogen silsesquioxane(HSQ).

Pattern and develop theHSQ layer. Reactive ion etch theUNCD to the substrate. Plate withgold to make final zone plate.

The whole 150nm diameter zoneplate

Detail view of outer zones

SiN

UNCD

HSQ

M. Wojick et al., “High Aspect Ratio Zone Plate Fabrication Using a Bilayer Mold”, EIBPN 2011.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 14 / 25

Page 82: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Zone plate fabrication

Making high aspect ratio zone plates is challenging but a new process hasbeen developed to make plates with an aspect ratio as high as 25.

Start with Ultra nano crystallinediamond (UNCD) films on SiN.Coat with hydrogen silsesquioxane(HSQ). Pattern and develop theHSQ layer.

Reactive ion etch theUNCD to the substrate. Plate withgold to make final zone plate.

The whole 150nm diameter zoneplate

Detail view of outer zones

SiN

UNCD

HSQ

M. Wojick et al., “High Aspect Ratio Zone Plate Fabrication Using a Bilayer Mold”, EIBPN 2011.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 14 / 25

Page 83: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Zone plate fabrication

Making high aspect ratio zone plates is challenging but a new process hasbeen developed to make plates with an aspect ratio as high as 25.

Start with Ultra nano crystallinediamond (UNCD) films on SiN.Coat with hydrogen silsesquioxane(HSQ). Pattern and develop theHSQ layer. Reactive ion etch theUNCD to the substrate.

Plate withgold to make final zone plate.

The whole 150nm diameter zoneplate

Detail view of outer zones

SiN

UNCD

HSQ

M. Wojick et al., “High Aspect Ratio Zone Plate Fabrication Using a Bilayer Mold”, EIBPN 2011.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 14 / 25

Page 84: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Zone plate fabrication

Making high aspect ratio zone plates is challenging but a new process hasbeen developed to make plates with an aspect ratio as high as 25.

Start with Ultra nano crystallinediamond (UNCD) films on SiN.Coat with hydrogen silsesquioxane(HSQ). Pattern and develop theHSQ layer. Reactive ion etch theUNCD to the substrate. Plate withgold to make final zone plate.

The whole 150nm diameter zoneplate

Detail view of outer zones

SiN

UNCD

HSQ

M. Wojick et al., “High Aspect Ratio Zone Plate Fabrication Using a Bilayer Mold”, EIBPN 2011.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 14 / 25

Page 85: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Zone plate fabrication

Making high aspect ratio zone plates is challenging but a new process hasbeen developed to make plates with an aspect ratio as high as 25.

Start with Ultra nano crystallinediamond (UNCD) films on SiN.Coat with hydrogen silsesquioxane(HSQ). Pattern and develop theHSQ layer. Reactive ion etch theUNCD to the substrate. Plate withgold to make final zone plate.

The whole 150nm diameter zoneplate

Detail view of outer zones

SiN

UNCD

HSQ

M. Wojick et al., “High Aspect Ratio Zone Plate Fabrication Using a Bilayer Mold”, EIBPN 2011.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 14 / 25

Page 86: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Zone plate fabrication

Making high aspect ratio zone plates is challenging but a new process hasbeen developed to make plates with an aspect ratio as high as 25.

Start with Ultra nano crystallinediamond (UNCD) films on SiN.Coat with hydrogen silsesquioxane(HSQ). Pattern and develop theHSQ layer. Reactive ion etch theUNCD to the substrate. Plate withgold to make final zone plate.

The whole 150nm diameter zoneplate

Detail view of outer zones

SiN

UNCD

HSQ

M. Wojick et al., “High Aspect Ratio Zone Plate Fabrication Using a Bilayer Mold”, EIBPN 2011.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 14 / 25

Page 87: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 1

Knowing that the photoelectric absorption of an element scales as theinverse of the energy cubed, calculate

(a) The absorption coefficient at 10keV for copper when the value at5keV is 1698.3 cm−1.

(b) The actual absorption coefficient of copper at 10keV is 1942.1 cm−1,why is this so different than your calculated value?

(a) We are given the energy de-pendence of the absorption co-efficient and its value at 5 keV.

(b) The calculation does nottake into account the Cu K ab-sorption edge at 8.98 keV.

µ10keVµ5kev

=1/103

1/53

µ10keV = µ5keV

(5

10

)3

= 1698.3 cm−1(

1

8

)= 212 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 15 / 25

Page 88: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 1

Knowing that the photoelectric absorption of an element scales as theinverse of the energy cubed, calculate

(a) The absorption coefficient at 10keV for copper when the value at5keV is 1698.3 cm−1.

(b) The actual absorption coefficient of copper at 10keV is 1942.1 cm−1,why is this so different than your calculated value?

(a) We are given the energy de-pendence of the absorption co-efficient and its value at 5 keV.

(b) The calculation does nottake into account the Cu K ab-sorption edge at 8.98 keV.

µ10keVµ5kev

=1/103

1/53

µ10keV = µ5keV

(5

10

)3

= 1698.3 cm−1(

1

8

)= 212 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 15 / 25

Page 89: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 1

Knowing that the photoelectric absorption of an element scales as theinverse of the energy cubed, calculate

(a) The absorption coefficient at 10keV for copper when the value at5keV is 1698.3 cm−1.

(b) The actual absorption coefficient of copper at 10keV is 1942.1 cm−1,why is this so different than your calculated value?

(a) We are given the energy de-pendence of the absorption co-efficient and its value at 5 keV.

(b) The calculation does nottake into account the Cu K ab-sorption edge at 8.98 keV.

µ10keVµ5kev

=1/103

1/53

µ10keV = µ5keV

(5

10

)3

= 1698.3 cm−1(

1

8

)= 212 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 15 / 25

Page 90: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 1

Knowing that the photoelectric absorption of an element scales as theinverse of the energy cubed, calculate

(a) The absorption coefficient at 10keV for copper when the value at5keV is 1698.3 cm−1.

(b) The actual absorption coefficient of copper at 10keV is 1942.1 cm−1,why is this so different than your calculated value?

(a) We are given the energy de-pendence of the absorption co-efficient and its value at 5 keV.

(b) The calculation does nottake into account the Cu K ab-sorption edge at 8.98 keV.

µ10keVµ5kev

=1/103

1/53

µ10keV = µ5keV

(5

10

)3

= 1698.3 cm−1(

1

8

)= 212 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 15 / 25

Page 91: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 1

Knowing that the photoelectric absorption of an element scales as theinverse of the energy cubed, calculate

(a) The absorption coefficient at 10keV for copper when the value at5keV is 1698.3 cm−1.

(b) The actual absorption coefficient of copper at 10keV is 1942.1 cm−1,why is this so different than your calculated value?

(a) We are given the energy de-pendence of the absorption co-efficient and its value at 5 keV.

(b) The calculation does nottake into account the Cu K ab-sorption edge at 8.98 keV.

µ10keVµ5kev

=1/103

1/53

µ10keV = µ5keV

(5

10

)3

= 1698.3 cm−1(

1

8

)

= 212 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 15 / 25

Page 92: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 1

Knowing that the photoelectric absorption of an element scales as theinverse of the energy cubed, calculate

(a) The absorption coefficient at 10keV for copper when the value at5keV is 1698.3 cm−1.

(b) The actual absorption coefficient of copper at 10keV is 1942.1 cm−1,why is this so different than your calculated value?

(a) We are given the energy de-pendence of the absorption co-efficient and its value at 5 keV.

(b) The calculation does nottake into account the Cu K ab-sorption edge at 8.98 keV.

µ10keVµ5kev

=1/103

1/53

µ10keV = µ5keV

(5

10

)3

= 1698.3 cm−1(

1

8

)= 212 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 15 / 25

Page 93: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 1

Knowing that the photoelectric absorption of an element scales as theinverse of the energy cubed, calculate

(a) The absorption coefficient at 10keV for copper when the value at5keV is 1698.3 cm−1.

(b) The actual absorption coefficient of copper at 10keV is 1942.1 cm−1,why is this so different than your calculated value?

(a) We are given the energy de-pendence of the absorption co-efficient and its value at 5 keV.

(b) The calculation does nottake into account the Cu K ab-sorption edge at 8.98 keV.

µ10keVµ5kev

=1/103

1/53

µ10keV = µ5keV

(5

10

)3

= 1698.3 cm−1(

1

8

)= 212 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 15 / 25

Page 94: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2

A 30 cm long, ionization chamber, filled with 80% helium and 20%nitrogen gases at 1 atmosphere, is being used to measure the photon rate(photons/sec) in a synchrotron beamline at 12 keV. If a current ofi =10 nA is measured, what is the photon flux entering the ionizationchamber?

The number of free electrons per second generated in the ion chamber bythe beam is given by

dN

dt= [f (E ) Φ]

[E

W

]where f (E ) is the fraction of the beam absorbed, Φ is the total flux

incident on the ion chamber, E is the energy of a single photon, and W isthe energy required to produce a free electron in the gas mixture. Thefraction of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 16 / 25

Page 95: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2

A 30 cm long, ionization chamber, filled with 80% helium and 20%nitrogen gases at 1 atmosphere, is being used to measure the photon rate(photons/sec) in a synchrotron beamline at 12 keV. If a current ofi =10 nA is measured, what is the photon flux entering the ionizationchamber?

The number of free electrons per second generated in the ion chamber bythe beam is given by

dN

dt= [f (E ) Φ]

[E

W

]where f (E ) is the fraction of the beam absorbed, Φ is the total flux

incident on the ion chamber, E is the energy of a single photon, and W isthe energy required to produce a free electron in the gas mixture. Thefraction of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 16 / 25

Page 96: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2

A 30 cm long, ionization chamber, filled with 80% helium and 20%nitrogen gases at 1 atmosphere, is being used to measure the photon rate(photons/sec) in a synchrotron beamline at 12 keV. If a current ofi =10 nA is measured, what is the photon flux entering the ionizationchamber?

The number of free electrons per second generated in the ion chamber bythe beam is given by

dN

dt= [f (E ) Φ]

[E

W

]

where f (E ) is the fraction of the beam absorbed, Φ is the total fluxincident on the ion chamber, E is the energy of a single photon, and W isthe energy required to produce a free electron in the gas mixture. Thefraction of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 16 / 25

Page 97: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2

A 30 cm long, ionization chamber, filled with 80% helium and 20%nitrogen gases at 1 atmosphere, is being used to measure the photon rate(photons/sec) in a synchrotron beamline at 12 keV. If a current ofi =10 nA is measured, what is the photon flux entering the ionizationchamber?

The number of free electrons per second generated in the ion chamber bythe beam is given by

dN

dt= [f (E ) Φ]

[E

W

]where f (E ) is the fraction of the beam absorbed, Φ is the total flux

incident on the ion chamber, E is the energy of a single photon, and W isthe energy required to produce a free electron in the gas mixture.

Thefraction of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 16 / 25

Page 98: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2

A 30 cm long, ionization chamber, filled with 80% helium and 20%nitrogen gases at 1 atmosphere, is being used to measure the photon rate(photons/sec) in a synchrotron beamline at 12 keV. If a current ofi =10 nA is measured, what is the photon flux entering the ionizationchamber?

The number of free electrons per second generated in the ion chamber bythe beam is given by

dN

dt= [f (E ) Φ]

[E

W

]where f (E ) is the fraction of the beam absorbed, Φ is the total flux

incident on the ion chamber, E is the energy of a single photon, and W isthe energy required to produce a free electron in the gas mixture. Thefraction of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 16 / 25

Page 99: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2

A 30 cm long, ionization chamber, filled with 80% helium and 20%nitrogen gases at 1 atmosphere, is being used to measure the photon rate(photons/sec) in a synchrotron beamline at 12 keV. If a current ofi =10 nA is measured, what is the photon flux entering the ionizationchamber?

The number of free electrons per second generated in the ion chamber bythe beam is given by

dN

dt= [f (E ) Φ]

[E

W

]where f (E ) is the fraction of the beam absorbed, Φ is the total flux

incident on the ion chamber, E is the energy of a single photon, and W isthe energy required to produce a free electron in the gas mixture. Thefraction of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0

= 1− e−µL

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 16 / 25

Page 100: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2

A 30 cm long, ionization chamber, filled with 80% helium and 20%nitrogen gases at 1 atmosphere, is being used to measure the photon rate(photons/sec) in a synchrotron beamline at 12 keV. If a current ofi =10 nA is measured, what is the photon flux entering the ionizationchamber?

The number of free electrons per second generated in the ion chamber bythe beam is given by

dN

dt= [f (E ) Φ]

[E

W

]where f (E ) is the fraction of the beam absorbed, Φ is the total flux

incident on the ion chamber, E is the energy of a single photon, and W isthe energy required to produce a free electron in the gas mixture. Thefraction of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 16 / 25

Page 101: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber.

Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1 µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2 = 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 102: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber.

Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1 µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2 = 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 103: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber. Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1 µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2 = 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 104: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber. Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1 µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2 = 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 105: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber. Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1 µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2 = 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 106: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber. Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1

µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2 = 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 107: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber. Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1 µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2 = 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 108: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber. Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1 µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2

= 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 109: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber. Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1 µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2 = 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 110: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

The total absorption coefficient µis a weighted sum of the absorp-tion of the substance in the ionchamber. Where the quantity µican be computed from the absorp-tion cross section of each compo-nent (σa,i ), its mass density (ρm,i ),molar mass (Mi ), and Avogadro’snumber (NA).

µ =N∑i=1

xiµi

µi =

(ρm,iNA

Mi

)σa,i

These values can be computed orlooked up in the orange book or onthe MuCal online calculator for theenergy desired. For E = 12 keV,the photoelectric cross-section is

µHe = 2.0× 10−6 cm−1 µN2 = 2.29× 10−3

µ = 0.8µHe + 0.2µN2 = 0.8 · 2.0× 10−6 + 0.2 · 2.29× 10−3

= 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 17 / 25

Page 111: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 112: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

= 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 113: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 114: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 115: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 116: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e

=10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 117: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 118: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 119: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 120: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 121: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36

= 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 122: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 123: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 124: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E

=(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 125: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)

= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 126: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 2 (cont.)

Now we use this to calculate thefraction of photons absorbed in thechamber

dN

dt=

i

e=

10× 10−9

1.602× 10−19

= 6.24× 1010 s−1

Finally, we look up in the orangebook the energy required to make afree electron by inoization for eachgas and take a weighted average

µ = 4.60× 10−4 cm−1

f (E ) = 1− e−µL = 1− e−4.60×−4·30

= 0.0136 = 1.36%

The number of electrons per secondcan be computed directly from themeasured current

WHe = 41 eV WN2 = 36 eV

W = 0.8 · 41 + 0.2 · 36 = 40 eV

Putting it all together

Φ =dN

dt

W

f (E )E=

(6.24×10 s−1)(40 eV)

(0.0136)(12× 103 eV/photon)= 1.53× 1010 photon/s

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 18 / 25

Page 127: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3

A 5 cm deep ionization chamber is used to measure the fluorescence froma sample containing arsenic (As). Using any noble gases or nitrogen,determine a gas fill (at 1 atmosphere) for this chamber which absorbs atleast 60% of the incident photons. How does this change if you aremeasuring the fluorescence from ruthenium (Ru)?

The energy of the arsenic fluores-ence line can be obtained fromMuCal or from Hephaestus and is10.54 keV. We would like to haveat least 60% absorption in the 5 cmchamber. This can give us the de-sired value of µ.

This is the minimum value of theabsorption that we require.

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

e−µL = [1− f (E )]

− µL = ln[1− f (E )]

µ =− ln[1− f (E )]

L

=− ln[1− 0.6]

5 cm= 0.183 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 19 / 25

Page 128: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3

A 5 cm deep ionization chamber is used to measure the fluorescence froma sample containing arsenic (As). Using any noble gases or nitrogen,determine a gas fill (at 1 atmosphere) for this chamber which absorbs atleast 60% of the incident photons. How does this change if you aremeasuring the fluorescence from ruthenium (Ru)?

The energy of the arsenic fluores-ence line can be obtained fromMuCal or from Hephaestus and is10.54 keV. We would like to haveat least 60% absorption in the 5 cmchamber. This can give us the de-sired value of µ.

This is the minimum value of theabsorption that we require.

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

e−µL = [1− f (E )]

− µL = ln[1− f (E )]

µ =− ln[1− f (E )]

L

=− ln[1− 0.6]

5 cm= 0.183 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 19 / 25

Page 129: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3

A 5 cm deep ionization chamber is used to measure the fluorescence froma sample containing arsenic (As). Using any noble gases or nitrogen,determine a gas fill (at 1 atmosphere) for this chamber which absorbs atleast 60% of the incident photons. How does this change if you aremeasuring the fluorescence from ruthenium (Ru)?

The energy of the arsenic fluores-ence line can be obtained fromMuCal or from Hephaestus and is10.54 keV. We would like to haveat least 60% absorption in the 5 cmchamber. This can give us the de-sired value of µ.

This is the minimum value of theabsorption that we require.

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

e−µL = [1− f (E )]

− µL = ln[1− f (E )]

µ =− ln[1− f (E )]

L

=− ln[1− 0.6]

5 cm= 0.183 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 19 / 25

Page 130: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3

A 5 cm deep ionization chamber is used to measure the fluorescence froma sample containing arsenic (As). Using any noble gases or nitrogen,determine a gas fill (at 1 atmosphere) for this chamber which absorbs atleast 60% of the incident photons. How does this change if you aremeasuring the fluorescence from ruthenium (Ru)?

The energy of the arsenic fluores-ence line can be obtained fromMuCal or from Hephaestus and is10.54 keV. We would like to haveat least 60% absorption in the 5 cmchamber. This can give us the de-sired value of µ.

This is the minimum value of theabsorption that we require.

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

e−µL = [1− f (E )]

− µL = ln[1− f (E )]

µ =− ln[1− f (E )]

L

=− ln[1− 0.6]

5 cm= 0.183 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 19 / 25

Page 131: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3

A 5 cm deep ionization chamber is used to measure the fluorescence froma sample containing arsenic (As). Using any noble gases or nitrogen,determine a gas fill (at 1 atmosphere) for this chamber which absorbs atleast 60% of the incident photons. How does this change if you aremeasuring the fluorescence from ruthenium (Ru)?

The energy of the arsenic fluores-ence line can be obtained fromMuCal or from Hephaestus and is10.54 keV. We would like to haveat least 60% absorption in the 5 cmchamber. This can give us the de-sired value of µ.

This is the minimum value of theabsorption that we require.

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

e−µL = [1− f (E )]

− µL = ln[1− f (E )]

µ =− ln[1− f (E )]

L

=− ln[1− 0.6]

5 cm= 0.183 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 19 / 25

Page 132: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3

A 5 cm deep ionization chamber is used to measure the fluorescence froma sample containing arsenic (As). Using any noble gases or nitrogen,determine a gas fill (at 1 atmosphere) for this chamber which absorbs atleast 60% of the incident photons. How does this change if you aremeasuring the fluorescence from ruthenium (Ru)?

The energy of the arsenic fluores-ence line can be obtained fromMuCal or from Hephaestus and is10.54 keV. We would like to haveat least 60% absorption in the 5 cmchamber. This can give us the de-sired value of µ.

This is the minimum value of theabsorption that we require.

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

e−µL = [1− f (E )]

− µL = ln[1− f (E )]

µ =− ln[1− f (E )]

L

=− ln[1− 0.6]

5 cm= 0.183 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 19 / 25

Page 133: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3

A 5 cm deep ionization chamber is used to measure the fluorescence froma sample containing arsenic (As). Using any noble gases or nitrogen,determine a gas fill (at 1 atmosphere) for this chamber which absorbs atleast 60% of the incident photons. How does this change if you aremeasuring the fluorescence from ruthenium (Ru)?

The energy of the arsenic fluores-ence line can be obtained fromMuCal or from Hephaestus and is10.54 keV. We would like to haveat least 60% absorption in the 5 cmchamber. This can give us the de-sired value of µ.

This is the minimum value of theabsorption that we require.

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

e−µL = [1− f (E )]

− µL = ln[1− f (E )]

µ =− ln[1− f (E )]

L

=− ln[1− 0.6]

5 cm

= 0.183 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 19 / 25

Page 134: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3

A 5 cm deep ionization chamber is used to measure the fluorescence froma sample containing arsenic (As). Using any noble gases or nitrogen,determine a gas fill (at 1 atmosphere) for this chamber which absorbs atleast 60% of the incident photons. How does this change if you aremeasuring the fluorescence from ruthenium (Ru)?

The energy of the arsenic fluores-ence line can be obtained fromMuCal or from Hephaestus and is10.54 keV. We would like to haveat least 60% absorption in the 5 cmchamber. This can give us the de-sired value of µ.

This is the minimum value of theabsorption that we require.

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

e−µL = [1− f (E )]

− µL = ln[1− f (E )]

µ =− ln[1− f (E )]

L

=− ln[1− 0.6]

5 cm= 0.183 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 19 / 25

Page 135: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3

A 5 cm deep ionization chamber is used to measure the fluorescence froma sample containing arsenic (As). Using any noble gases or nitrogen,determine a gas fill (at 1 atmosphere) for this chamber which absorbs atleast 60% of the incident photons. How does this change if you aremeasuring the fluorescence from ruthenium (Ru)?

The energy of the arsenic fluores-ence line can be obtained fromMuCal or from Hephaestus and is10.54 keV. We would like to haveat least 60% absorption in the 5 cmchamber. This can give us the de-sired value of µ.

This is the minimum value of theabsorption that we require.

f (E ) = 1− e−µL

e−µL = [1− f (E )]

− µL = ln[1− f (E )]

µ =− ln[1− f (E )]

L

=− ln[1− 0.6]

5 cm= 0.183 cm−1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 19 / 25

Page 136: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 137: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1

µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 138: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1

µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 139: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 140: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1

µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 141: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1

µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 142: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1

µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 143: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 144: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 145: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5)

= 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 146: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 147: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5)

= 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 148: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 149: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 150: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1

µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 151: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1

µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 152: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1

µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 153: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 154: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5)

= 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 155: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 156: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5)

= 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 157: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 158: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5)

= 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 159: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 3 (cont.)

Looking at tabulated values of the absorption coefficient for various gasesat this energy (from MuCal, total cross-section):

µHe = 4.2× 10−5 cm−1 µN2 = 3.9× 10−3 cm−1 µNe = 8.8× 10−3 cm−1

µAr = 0.098 cm−1 µKr = 0.17 cm−1 µXe = 0.89 cm−1 µRn = 1.3 cm−1

Thus for the most likely candidates we have

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.89)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

For the Ru K-edge at 19.28 keV, we have

µAr = 0.017 cm−1 µKr = 0.23 cm−1 µXe = 0.17 cm−1 µRn = 0.99 cm−1

f (E )Kr = 1− e−(0.23)(5) = 1− 0.32 = 68%

f (E )Xe = 1− e−(0.17)(5) = 1− 0.43 = 57%

f (E )Rn = 1− e−(0.99)(5) = 1− 0.01 = 99%

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 20 / 25

Page 160: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4

Calculate the characteristic angle of reflection of 10keV and 30keV x-raysfor:

(a) A slab of glass (SiO2)

(b) A thick chromium mirror;

(c) A thick platinum mirror.

(d) If the incident x-ray beam is 2mm high, what length of mirror isrequired to reflect the entire beam for each material?

The critical angle is related to theindex of refraction, withr0 = 2.82× 10−5A

αc =√

2δ, δ =2πρr0k2

the electron density ρ can be computed using the mass density, ρm

ρ[e−/A3] =

ρm[g/cm3] · NA[atom/mol] · Z [e−/atom]

M[g/mol] · (108[A/cm])3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 21 / 25

Page 161: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4

Calculate the characteristic angle of reflection of 10keV and 30keV x-raysfor:

(a) A slab of glass (SiO2)

(b) A thick chromium mirror;

(c) A thick platinum mirror.

(d) If the incident x-ray beam is 2mm high, what length of mirror isrequired to reflect the entire beam for each material?

The critical angle is related to theindex of refraction,

withr0 = 2.82× 10−5A

αc =√

2δ, δ =2πρr0k2

the electron density ρ can be computed using the mass density, ρm

ρ[e−/A3] =

ρm[g/cm3] · NA[atom/mol] · Z [e−/atom]

M[g/mol] · (108[A/cm])3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 21 / 25

Page 162: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4

Calculate the characteristic angle of reflection of 10keV and 30keV x-raysfor:

(a) A slab of glass (SiO2)

(b) A thick chromium mirror;

(c) A thick platinum mirror.

(d) If the incident x-ray beam is 2mm high, what length of mirror isrequired to reflect the entire beam for each material?

The critical angle is related to theindex of refraction, withr0 = 2.82× 10−5A

αc =√

2δ, δ =2πρr0k2

the electron density ρ can be computed using the mass density, ρm

ρ[e−/A3] =

ρm[g/cm3] · NA[atom/mol] · Z [e−/atom]

M[g/mol] · (108[A/cm])3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 21 / 25

Page 163: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4

Calculate the characteristic angle of reflection of 10keV and 30keV x-raysfor:

(a) A slab of glass (SiO2)

(b) A thick chromium mirror;

(c) A thick platinum mirror.

(d) If the incident x-ray beam is 2mm high, what length of mirror isrequired to reflect the entire beam for each material?

The critical angle is related to theindex of refraction, withr0 = 2.82× 10−5A

αc =√

2δ, δ =2πρr0k2

the electron density ρ can be computed using the mass density, ρm

ρ[e−/A3] =

ρm[g/cm3] · NA[atom/mol] · Z [e−/atom]

M[g/mol] · (108[A/cm])3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 21 / 25

Page 164: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4

Calculate the characteristic angle of reflection of 10keV and 30keV x-raysfor:

(a) A slab of glass (SiO2)

(b) A thick chromium mirror;

(c) A thick platinum mirror.

(d) If the incident x-ray beam is 2mm high, what length of mirror isrequired to reflect the entire beam for each material?

The critical angle is related to theindex of refraction, withr0 = 2.82× 10−5A

αc =√

2δ, δ =2πρr0k2

the electron density ρ can be computed using the mass density, ρm

ρ[e−/A3] =

ρm[g/cm3] · NA[atom/mol] · Z [e−/atom]

M[g/mol] · (108[A/cm])3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 21 / 25

Page 165: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc=

2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1] = 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ, αc30 = 1.20× 10−3

√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 166: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc

=2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1] = 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ, αc30 = 1.20× 10−3

√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 167: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc=

2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])

= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1] = 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ, αc30 = 1.20× 10−3

√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 168: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc=

2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1] = 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ, αc30 = 1.20× 10−3

√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 169: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc=

2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1] = 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ, αc30 = 1.20× 10−3

√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 170: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc=

2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1]

= 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ, αc30 = 1.20× 10−3

√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 171: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc=

2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1] = 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ, αc30 = 1.20× 10−3

√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 172: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc=

2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1] = 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ, αc30 = 1.20× 10−3

√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 173: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc=

2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1] = 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ,

αc30 = 1.20× 10−3√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 174: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

The wave number for the radiation is given by

k[A−1]

=2πE

hc=

2πE [keV]× 103

(4.135× 10−15[eV·s])(3× 1018[A/s])= 0.51E [keV]

now the expression for the critical angle becomes

αc =√

4π(2.82× 10−5[A])

√ρ[e−/A

3]k[A−1] = 3.71× 10−2

√ρ[e−/A

3]E [keV]

for the two energies specified (10 keV and 30 keV), we have

αc10 = 3.71× 10−3√ρ, αc30 = 1.20× 10−3

√ρ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 22 / 25

Page 175: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 176: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3,

αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 177: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦,

αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 178: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 179: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 180: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3,

αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 181: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦,

αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 182: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 183: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 184: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3,

αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 185: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦,

αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 186: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 187: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 188: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 189: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 190: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 4 (cont.)

(a) for SiO2, ρm = 2.2 g/cm2, M = 60 g/mol, Z = 30

ρ = 0.662A−3, αc10 = 3.02mrad = 0.17◦, αc30 = 1.01mrad = 0.06◦,

(b) for Cr, ρm = 7.19 g/cm2, M = 52 g/mol, Z = 24

ρ = 1.99A−3, αc10 = 5.25mrad = 0.30◦, αc30 = 1.75mrad = 0.10◦,

(c) for Pt, ρm = 21.4 g/cm2, M = 195 g/mol, Z = 78

ρ = 5.16A−3, αc10 = 8.44mrad = 0.48◦, αc30 = 2.81mrad = 0.16◦,

(d) The length of the the mirror re-quired to capture the entire 2 mmhigh beam is given by

L =2mm

αc

for the 6 cases in (a-c) we have

10 keV 30 keV

SiO2 0.67 m 2.00 mCr 0.38 m 1.14 mPt 0.25 m 0.72 m

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 23 / 25

Page 191: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5

Calculate the fraction of silver (Ag) fluorescence x-rays which are absorbedin a 1 mm thick silicon (Si) detector and the charge pulse expected foreach absorbed photon. Repeat the calculation for a 1 mm thickgermanium (Ge) detector.

The Ag Kα fluorescence line is at 22.2 keV and the absorption coefficientsfor Si and Ge at that energy, are

µSi = 7.5cm−1, µGe = 168cm−1,

the percentage of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

fSi (E ) = 1− e−(7.5)(0.1) = 0.53 = 53%

fGe(E ) = 1− e−(168)(0.1) = 0.99 = 99%,

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 24 / 25

Page 192: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5

Calculate the fraction of silver (Ag) fluorescence x-rays which are absorbedin a 1 mm thick silicon (Si) detector and the charge pulse expected foreach absorbed photon. Repeat the calculation for a 1 mm thickgermanium (Ge) detector.

The Ag Kα fluorescence line is at 22.2 keV and the absorption coefficientsfor Si and Ge at that energy, are

µSi = 7.5cm−1, µGe = 168cm−1,

the percentage of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

fSi (E ) = 1− e−(7.5)(0.1) = 0.53 = 53%

fGe(E ) = 1− e−(168)(0.1) = 0.99 = 99%,

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 24 / 25

Page 193: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5

Calculate the fraction of silver (Ag) fluorescence x-rays which are absorbedin a 1 mm thick silicon (Si) detector and the charge pulse expected foreach absorbed photon. Repeat the calculation for a 1 mm thickgermanium (Ge) detector.

The Ag Kα fluorescence line is at 22.2 keV and the absorption coefficientsfor Si and Ge at that energy, are

µSi = 7.5cm−1,

µGe = 168cm−1,

the percentage of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

fSi (E ) = 1− e−(7.5)(0.1) = 0.53 = 53%

fGe(E ) = 1− e−(168)(0.1) = 0.99 = 99%,

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 24 / 25

Page 194: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5

Calculate the fraction of silver (Ag) fluorescence x-rays which are absorbedin a 1 mm thick silicon (Si) detector and the charge pulse expected foreach absorbed photon. Repeat the calculation for a 1 mm thickgermanium (Ge) detector.

The Ag Kα fluorescence line is at 22.2 keV and the absorption coefficientsfor Si and Ge at that energy, are

µSi = 7.5cm−1, µGe = 168cm−1,

the percentage of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

fSi (E ) = 1− e−(7.5)(0.1) = 0.53 = 53%

fGe(E ) = 1− e−(168)(0.1) = 0.99 = 99%,

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 24 / 25

Page 195: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5

Calculate the fraction of silver (Ag) fluorescence x-rays which are absorbedin a 1 mm thick silicon (Si) detector and the charge pulse expected foreach absorbed photon. Repeat the calculation for a 1 mm thickgermanium (Ge) detector.

The Ag Kα fluorescence line is at 22.2 keV and the absorption coefficientsfor Si and Ge at that energy, are

µSi = 7.5cm−1, µGe = 168cm−1,

the percentage of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

fSi (E ) = 1− e−(7.5)(0.1) = 0.53 = 53%

fGe(E ) = 1− e−(168)(0.1) = 0.99 = 99%,

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 24 / 25

Page 196: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5

Calculate the fraction of silver (Ag) fluorescence x-rays which are absorbedin a 1 mm thick silicon (Si) detector and the charge pulse expected foreach absorbed photon. Repeat the calculation for a 1 mm thickgermanium (Ge) detector.

The Ag Kα fluorescence line is at 22.2 keV and the absorption coefficientsfor Si and Ge at that energy, are

µSi = 7.5cm−1, µGe = 168cm−1,

the percentage of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

fSi (E ) = 1− e−(7.5)(0.1) = 0.53 = 53%

fGe(E ) = 1− e−(168)(0.1) = 0.99 = 99%,

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 24 / 25

Page 197: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5

Calculate the fraction of silver (Ag) fluorescence x-rays which are absorbedin a 1 mm thick silicon (Si) detector and the charge pulse expected foreach absorbed photon. Repeat the calculation for a 1 mm thickgermanium (Ge) detector.

The Ag Kα fluorescence line is at 22.2 keV and the absorption coefficientsfor Si and Ge at that energy, are

µSi = 7.5cm−1, µGe = 168cm−1,

the percentage of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

fSi (E ) = 1− e−(7.5)(0.1) = 0.53 = 53%

fGe(E ) = 1− e−(168)(0.1) = 0.99 = 99%,

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 24 / 25

Page 198: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5

Calculate the fraction of silver (Ag) fluorescence x-rays which are absorbedin a 1 mm thick silicon (Si) detector and the charge pulse expected foreach absorbed photon. Repeat the calculation for a 1 mm thickgermanium (Ge) detector.

The Ag Kα fluorescence line is at 22.2 keV and the absorption coefficientsfor Si and Ge at that energy, are

µSi = 7.5cm−1, µGe = 168cm−1,

the percentage of photons absorbed is given by

f (E ) =I0 − I (L)

I0= 1− e−µL

fSi (E ) = 1− e−(7.5)(0.1) = 0.53 = 53%

fGe(E ) = 1− e−(168)(0.1) = 0.99 = 99%,

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 24 / 25

Page 199: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5 (cont.)

The energy required to create an electron-hole pair (W ) is 3.7 eV for Siand 3.0 eV for Ge, so the number of electrons produced is

N =f (E )

WE [ev]

NSi =fSi (E )

WSiE =

0.53

3.72.22× 104 = 3175,

NGe =fGe(E )

WGeE =

0.99

3.02.22× 104 = 7393

we get the charge pulse by multiplying by the charge per electron

δqSi = 5.1× 10−16C, δqGe = 1.2× 10−15C

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 25 / 25

Page 200: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5 (cont.)

The energy required to create an electron-hole pair (W ) is 3.7 eV for Siand 3.0 eV for Ge, so the number of electrons produced is

N =f (E )

WE [ev]

NSi =fSi (E )

WSiE =

0.53

3.72.22× 104 = 3175,

NGe =fGe(E )

WGeE =

0.99

3.02.22× 104 = 7393

we get the charge pulse by multiplying by the charge per electron

δqSi = 5.1× 10−16C, δqGe = 1.2× 10−15C

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 25 / 25

Page 201: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5 (cont.)

The energy required to create an electron-hole pair (W ) is 3.7 eV for Siand 3.0 eV for Ge, so the number of electrons produced is

N =f (E )

WE [ev]

NSi =fSi (E )

WSiE =

0.53

3.72.22× 104 = 3175,

NGe =fGe(E )

WGeE =

0.99

3.02.22× 104 = 7393

we get the charge pulse by multiplying by the charge per electron

δqSi = 5.1× 10−16C, δqGe = 1.2× 10−15C

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 25 / 25

Page 202: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5 (cont.)

The energy required to create an electron-hole pair (W ) is 3.7 eV for Siand 3.0 eV for Ge, so the number of electrons produced is

N =f (E )

WE [ev]

NSi =fSi (E )

WSiE =

0.53

3.72.22× 104 = 3175,

NGe =fGe(E )

WGeE =

0.99

3.02.22× 104 = 7393

we get the charge pulse by multiplying by the charge per electron

δqSi = 5.1× 10−16C, δqGe = 1.2× 10−15C

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 25 / 25

Page 203: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5 (cont.)

The energy required to create an electron-hole pair (W ) is 3.7 eV for Siand 3.0 eV for Ge, so the number of electrons produced is

N =f (E )

WE [ev]

NSi =fSi (E )

WSiE =

0.53

3.72.22× 104 = 3175,

NGe =fGe(E )

WGeE =

0.99

3.02.22× 104 = 7393

we get the charge pulse by multiplying by the charge per electron

δqSi = 5.1× 10−16C, δqGe = 1.2× 10−15C

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 25 / 25

Page 204: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5 (cont.)

The energy required to create an electron-hole pair (W ) is 3.7 eV for Siand 3.0 eV for Ge, so the number of electrons produced is

N =f (E )

WE [ev]

NSi =fSi (E )

WSiE =

0.53

3.72.22× 104 = 3175,

NGe =fGe(E )

WGeE =

0.99

3.02.22× 104 = 7393

we get the charge pulse by multiplying by the charge per electron

δqSi = 5.1× 10−16C,

δqGe = 1.2× 10−15C

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 25 / 25

Page 205: Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16F/lecture_11.pdf · 2016-09-29 · Today’s Outline - September 28, 2016 Ideal refractive surface Fresnel lenses

Homework 02 - Problem 5 (cont.)

The energy required to create an electron-hole pair (W ) is 3.7 eV for Siand 3.0 eV for Ge, so the number of electrons produced is

N =f (E )

WE [ev]

NSi =fSi (E )

WSiE =

0.53

3.72.22× 104 = 3175,

NGe =fGe(E )

WGeE =

0.99

3.02.22× 104 = 7393

we get the charge pulse by multiplying by the charge per electron

δqSi = 5.1× 10−16C, δqGe = 1.2× 10−15C

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 September 28, 2016 25 / 25