98
Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012 We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceed to a discussion of x-ray sources. C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceedto a discussion of x-ray sources.

Refraction and reflection of x-rays

Magnetic interactions of x-rays

Coherence of x-ray sources

Introduction to x-ray sources

• The x-ray tube

• The synchrotron

• Bending magnet source

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Page 2: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceedto a discussion of x-ray sources.

Refraction and reflection of x-rays

Magnetic interactions of x-rays

Coherence of x-ray sources

Introduction to x-ray sources

• The x-ray tube

• The synchrotron

• Bending magnet source

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Page 3: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceedto a discussion of x-ray sources.

Refraction and reflection of x-rays

Magnetic interactions of x-rays

Coherence of x-ray sources

Introduction to x-ray sources

• The x-ray tube

• The synchrotron

• Bending magnet source

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Page 4: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceedto a discussion of x-ray sources.

Refraction and reflection of x-rays

Magnetic interactions of x-rays

Coherence of x-ray sources

Introduction to x-ray sources

• The x-ray tube

• The synchrotron

• Bending magnet source

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Page 5: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceedto a discussion of x-ray sources.

Refraction and reflection of x-rays

Magnetic interactions of x-rays

Coherence of x-ray sources

Introduction to x-ray sources

• The x-ray tube

• The synchrotron

• Bending magnet source

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Page 6: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceedto a discussion of x-ray sources.

Refraction and reflection of x-rays

Magnetic interactions of x-rays

Coherence of x-ray sources

Introduction to x-ray sources

• The x-ray tube

• The synchrotron

• Bending magnet source

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Page 7: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceedto a discussion of x-ray sources.

Refraction and reflection of x-rays

Magnetic interactions of x-rays

Coherence of x-ray sources

Introduction to x-ray sources

• The x-ray tube

• The synchrotron

• Bending magnet source

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Page 8: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceedto a discussion of x-ray sources.

Refraction and reflection of x-rays

Magnetic interactions of x-rays

Coherence of x-ray sources

Introduction to x-ray sources

• The x-ray tube

• The synchrotron

• Bending magnet source

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Page 9: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

We finish introducing the interactions of x-rays with matter and proceedto a discussion of x-ray sources.

Refraction and reflection of x-rays

Magnetic interactions of x-rays

Coherence of x-ray sources

Introduction to x-ray sources

• The x-ray tube

• The synchrotron

• Bending magnet source

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 1 / 17

Page 10: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Refraction of X-rays

X-rays can be treated like light when interaction with a medium. However,unlike visible light, the index of refraction of x-rays in matter is very closeto unity:

α

α’

n = 1− δ + iβ

with δ ∼ 10−5

Snell’s Law

cosα = n cosα′

where α′ < α unlike for visible light

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 2 / 17

Page 11: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Refraction of X-rays

X-rays can be treated like light when interaction with a medium. However,unlike visible light, the index of refraction of x-rays in matter is very closeto unity:

α

α’

n = 1− δ + iβ

with δ ∼ 10−5

Snell’s Law

cosα = n cosα′

where α′ < α unlike for visible light

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 2 / 17

Page 12: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Refraction of X-rays

X-rays can be treated like light when interaction with a medium. However,unlike visible light, the index of refraction of x-rays in matter is very closeto unity:

α

α’

n = 1− δ + iβ

with δ ∼ 10−5

Snell’s Law

cosα = n cosα′

where α′ < α unlike for visible light

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 2 / 17

Page 13: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Refraction of X-rays

X-rays can be treated like light when interaction with a medium. However,unlike visible light, the index of refraction of x-rays in matter is very closeto unity:

α

α’

n = 1− δ + iβ

with δ ∼ 10−5

Snell’s Law

cosα = n cosα′

where α′ < α unlike for visible light

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 2 / 17

Page 14: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Refraction of X-rays

X-rays can be treated like light when interaction with a medium. However,unlike visible light, the index of refraction of x-rays in matter is very closeto unity:

α

α’

n = 1− δ + iβ

with δ ∼ 10−5

Snell’s Law

cosα = n cosα′

where α′ < α unlike for visible light

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 2 / 17

Page 15: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Reflection of X-rays

Because n < 1, at a critical angle αc , we no longer have refraction but

total external reflection

α α

Since α′ = 0 when α = αc

n = cosαc

n ≈ 1− α2c

2

1− δ + iβ ≈ 1− α2c

2

δ =α2c

2−→ αc =

√2δ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 3 / 17

Page 16: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Reflection of X-rays

Because n < 1, at a critical angle αc , we no longer have refraction buttotal external reflection

α α

Since α′ = 0 when α = αc

n = cosαc

n ≈ 1− α2c

2

1− δ + iβ ≈ 1− α2c

2

δ =α2c

2−→ αc =

√2δ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 3 / 17

Page 17: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Reflection of X-rays

Because n < 1, at a critical angle αc , we no longer have refraction buttotal external reflection

α α

Since α′ = 0 when α = αc

n = cosαc

n ≈ 1− α2c

2

1− δ + iβ ≈ 1− α2c

2

δ =α2c

2−→ αc =

√2δ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 3 / 17

Page 18: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Reflection of X-rays

Because n < 1, at a critical angle αc , we no longer have refraction buttotal external reflection

α α

Since α′ = 0 when α = αc

n = cosαc

n ≈ 1− α2c

2

1− δ + iβ ≈ 1− α2c

2

δ =α2c

2−→ αc =

√2δ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 3 / 17

Page 19: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Reflection of X-rays

Because n < 1, at a critical angle αc , we no longer have refraction buttotal external reflection

α α

Since α′ = 0 when α = αc

n = cosαc

n ≈ 1− α2c

2

1− δ + iβ ≈ 1− α2c

2

δ =α2c

2−→ αc =

√2δ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 3 / 17

Page 20: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Reflection of X-rays

Because n < 1, at a critical angle αc , we no longer have refraction buttotal external reflection

α α

Since α′ = 0 when α = αc

n = cosαc

n ≈ 1− α2c

2

1− δ + iβ ≈ 1− α2c

2

δ =α2c

2−→ αc =

√2δ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 3 / 17

Page 21: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Reflection of X-rays

Because n < 1, at a critical angle αc , we no longer have refraction buttotal external reflection

α α

Since α′ = 0 when α = αc

n = cosαc

n ≈ 1− α2c

2

1− δ + iβ ≈ 1− α2c

2

δ =α2c

2−→ αc =

√2δ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 3 / 17

Page 22: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Uses of Total External Reflection

X-ray mirrors

• harmonic rejection

• focusing & collimation

Evanscent wave experiments

• studies of surfaces

• depth profiling

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 4 / 17

Page 23: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Uses of Total External Reflection

X-ray mirrors

• harmonic rejection

• focusing & collimation

Evanscent wave experiments

• studies of surfaces

• depth profiling

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 4 / 17

Page 24: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Uses of Total External Reflection

X-ray mirrors

• harmonic rejection

• focusing & collimation

Evanscent wave experiments

• studies of surfaces

• depth profiling

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 4 / 17

Page 25: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Uses of Total External Reflection

X-ray mirrors

• harmonic rejection

• focusing & collimation

Evanscent wave experiments

• studies of surfaces

• depth profiling

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 4 / 17

Page 26: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Uses of Total External Reflection

X-ray mirrors

• harmonic rejection

• focusing & collimation

Evanscent wave experiments

• studies of surfaces

• depth profiling

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 4 / 17

Page 27: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Uses of Total External Reflection

X-ray mirrors

• harmonic rejection

• focusing & collimation

Evanscent wave experiments

• studies of surfaces

• depth profiling

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 4 / 17

Page 28: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Magnetic Interactions

We have focused on the interaction of x-rays and charged particles.However, electromagnetic radiation also consists of a traveling mag-netic field. In principle, this means it should interact with magneticmaterials as well.

Indeed, x-rays do interact with magnetic materials (and electrons whichhave magnetic moment and spin) but the strength of the interactionis comparatively weak.

Amagnetic

Acharge=

~ωmc2

=5.11× 103 eV

0.511× 106 eV= 0.01

For an x-ray of energy 5.11 keV, interacting with an electron with mass0.511 MeV. Only with the advent of synchrotron radiation sources hasmagnetic x-ray scattering become a practical experimental technique.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 5 / 17

Page 29: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Magnetic Interactions

We have focused on the interaction of x-rays and charged particles.However, electromagnetic radiation also consists of a traveling mag-netic field. In principle, this means it should interact with magneticmaterials as well.

Indeed, x-rays do interact with magnetic materials (and electrons whichhave magnetic moment and spin) but the strength of the interactionis comparatively weak.

Amagnetic

Acharge=

~ωmc2

=5.11× 103 eV

0.511× 106 eV= 0.01

For an x-ray of energy 5.11 keV, interacting with an electron with mass0.511 MeV. Only with the advent of synchrotron radiation sources hasmagnetic x-ray scattering become a practical experimental technique.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 5 / 17

Page 30: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Magnetic Interactions

We have focused on the interaction of x-rays and charged particles.However, electromagnetic radiation also consists of a traveling mag-netic field. In principle, this means it should interact with magneticmaterials as well.

Indeed, x-rays do interact with magnetic materials (and electrons whichhave magnetic moment and spin) but the strength of the interactionis comparatively weak.

Amagnetic

Acharge=

~ωmc2

=5.11× 103 eV

0.511× 106 eV= 0.01

For an x-ray of energy 5.11 keV, interacting with an electron with mass0.511 MeV. Only with the advent of synchrotron radiation sources hasmagnetic x-ray scattering become a practical experimental technique.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 5 / 17

Page 31: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Magnetic Interactions

We have focused on the interaction of x-rays and charged particles.However, electromagnetic radiation also consists of a traveling mag-netic field. In principle, this means it should interact with magneticmaterials as well.

Indeed, x-rays do interact with magnetic materials (and electrons whichhave magnetic moment and spin) but the strength of the interactionis comparatively weak.

Amagnetic

Acharge=

~ωmc2

=5.11× 103 eV

0.511× 106 eV= 0.01

For an x-ray of energy 5.11 keV, interacting with an electron with mass0.511 MeV.

Only with the advent of synchrotron radiation sources hasmagnetic x-ray scattering become a practical experimental technique.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 5 / 17

Page 32: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Magnetic Interactions

We have focused on the interaction of x-rays and charged particles.However, electromagnetic radiation also consists of a traveling mag-netic field. In principle, this means it should interact with magneticmaterials as well.

Indeed, x-rays do interact with magnetic materials (and electrons whichhave magnetic moment and spin) but the strength of the interactionis comparatively weak.

Amagnetic

Acharge=

~ωmc2

=5.11× 103 eV

0.511× 106 eV

= 0.01

For an x-ray of energy 5.11 keV, interacting with an electron with mass0.511 MeV.

Only with the advent of synchrotron radiation sources hasmagnetic x-ray scattering become a practical experimental technique.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 5 / 17

Page 33: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Magnetic Interactions

We have focused on the interaction of x-rays and charged particles.However, electromagnetic radiation also consists of a traveling mag-netic field. In principle, this means it should interact with magneticmaterials as well.

Indeed, x-rays do interact with magnetic materials (and electrons whichhave magnetic moment and spin) but the strength of the interactionis comparatively weak.

Amagnetic

Acharge=

~ωmc2

=5.11× 103 eV

0.511× 106 eV= 0.01

For an x-ray of energy 5.11 keV, interacting with an electron with mass0.511 MeV.

Only with the advent of synchrotron radiation sources hasmagnetic x-ray scattering become a practical experimental technique.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 5 / 17

Page 34: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Magnetic Interactions

We have focused on the interaction of x-rays and charged particles.However, electromagnetic radiation also consists of a traveling mag-netic field. In principle, this means it should interact with magneticmaterials as well.

Indeed, x-rays do interact with magnetic materials (and electrons whichhave magnetic moment and spin) but the strength of the interactionis comparatively weak.

Amagnetic

Acharge=

~ωmc2

=5.11× 103 eV

0.511× 106 eV= 0.01

For an x-ray of energy 5.11 keV, interacting with an electron with mass0.511 MeV. Only with the advent of synchrotron radiation sources hasmagnetic x-ray scattering become a practical experimental technique.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 5 / 17

Page 35: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

What is coherence?

So far, in our discussion, we have assumed that x-rays are“plane waves”. What does this really mean?

A plane wave has perfect coherence (like a laser).

Real x-rays are not perfect plane waves in two ways:

• they are not perfectly monochromatic

• they do not travel in a perfectly co-linear direction

Because of these imperfections the “coherence length” of anx-ray beam is finite and we can calculate it.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 6 / 17

Page 36: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

What is coherence?

So far, in our discussion, we have assumed that x-rays are“plane waves”. What does this really mean?

A plane wave has perfect coherence (like a laser).

Real x-rays are not perfect plane waves in two ways:

• they are not perfectly monochromatic

• they do not travel in a perfectly co-linear direction

Because of these imperfections the “coherence length” of anx-ray beam is finite and we can calculate it.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 6 / 17

Page 37: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

What is coherence?

So far, in our discussion, we have assumed that x-rays are“plane waves”. What does this really mean?

A plane wave has perfect coherence (like a laser).

Real x-rays are not perfect plane waves in two ways:

• they are not perfectly monochromatic

• they do not travel in a perfectly co-linear direction

Because of these imperfections the “coherence length” of anx-ray beam is finite and we can calculate it.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 6 / 17

Page 38: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

What is coherence?

So far, in our discussion, we have assumed that x-rays are“plane waves”. What does this really mean?

A plane wave has perfect coherence (like a laser).

Real x-rays are not perfect plane waves in two ways:

• they are not perfectly monochromatic

• they do not travel in a perfectly co-linear direction

Because of these imperfections the “coherence length” of anx-ray beam is finite and we can calculate it.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 6 / 17

Page 39: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

What is coherence?

So far, in our discussion, we have assumed that x-rays are“plane waves”. What does this really mean?

A plane wave has perfect coherence (like a laser).

Real x-rays are not perfect plane waves in two ways:

• they are not perfectly monochromatic

• they do not travel in a perfectly co-linear direction

Because of these imperfections the “coherence length” of anx-ray beam is finite and we can calculate it.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 6 / 17

Page 40: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

What is coherence?

So far, in our discussion, we have assumed that x-rays are“plane waves”. What does this really mean?

A plane wave has perfect coherence (like a laser).

Real x-rays are not perfect plane waves in two ways:

• they are not perfectly monochromatic

• they do not travel in a perfectly co-linear direction

Because of these imperfections the “coherence length” of anx-ray beam is finite and we can calculate it.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 6 / 17

Page 41: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ −→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ −→ N ≈ λ

∆λ−→ LL =

λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 42: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ −→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ −→ N ≈ λ

∆λ−→ LL =

λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 43: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ −→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ −→ N ≈ λ

∆λ−→ LL =

λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 44: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ

2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ −→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ −→ N ≈ λ

∆λ−→ LL =

λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 45: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ −→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ −→ N ≈ λ

∆λ−→ LL =

λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 46: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ −→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ −→ N ≈ λ

∆λ−→ LL =

λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 47: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ

−→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ −→ N ≈ λ

∆λ−→ LL =

λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 48: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ −→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ

−→ N ≈ λ

∆λ−→ LL =

λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 49: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ −→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ −→ N ≈ λ

∆λ

−→ LL =λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 50: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Longitudinal Coherence

Definition: Distance over which two waves from the same source pointwith slightly different wavelengths will completely dephase.

λ

λ−∆λ

P

2LL

Two waves of slightly different wavelengthsλ and λ−∆λ are emitted from the samepoint in space simultaneously.

After a distance LL, the two waves will beexactly out of phase and after 2LL they willonce again be in phase.

2LL = Nλ2LL = (N + 1)(λ−∆λ)

Nλ = Nλ+ λ− N∆λ−∆λ

0 = λ−N∆λ−∆λ −→ λ = (N + 1)∆λ −→ N ≈ λ

∆λ−→ LL =

λ2

2∆λ

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 7 / 17

Page 51: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Transverse Coherence

Definition: The lateral distance along a wavefront over which there is acomplete dephasing between two waves, of the same wavelength, whichoriginate from two separate points in space.

λ

D

∆θ

2LT

P

R

∆θ

If we assume that the two wavesoriginate from points with a smallangular separation ∆θ, Thetransverse coherence length is givenby:

λ

2LT= tan ∆θ ≈ ∆θ

D

R= tan ∆θ ≈ ∆θ

LT =λR

2D

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 8 / 17

Page 52: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Transverse Coherence

Definition: The lateral distance along a wavefront over which there is acomplete dephasing between two waves, of the same wavelength, whichoriginate from two separate points in space.

λ

D

∆θ

2LT

P

R

∆θ

If we assume that the two wavesoriginate from points with a smallangular separation ∆θ, Thetransverse coherence length is givenby:

λ

2LT= tan ∆θ ≈ ∆θ

D

R= tan ∆θ ≈ ∆θ

LT =λR

2D

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 8 / 17

Page 53: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Transverse Coherence

Definition: The lateral distance along a wavefront over which there is acomplete dephasing between two waves, of the same wavelength, whichoriginate from two separate points in space.

λ

D

∆θ

2LT

P

R

∆θ

If we assume that the two wavesoriginate from points with a smallangular separation ∆θ, Thetransverse coherence length is givenby:

λ

2LT= tan ∆θ

≈ ∆θ

D

R= tan ∆θ

≈ ∆θ

LT =λR

2D

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 8 / 17

Page 54: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Transverse Coherence

Definition: The lateral distance along a wavefront over which there is acomplete dephasing between two waves, of the same wavelength, whichoriginate from two separate points in space.

λ

D

∆θ

2LT

P

R

∆θ

If we assume that the two wavesoriginate from points with a smallangular separation ∆θ, Thetransverse coherence length is givenby:

λ

2LT= tan ∆θ ≈ ∆θ

D

R= tan ∆θ ≈ ∆θ

LT =λR

2D

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 8 / 17

Page 55: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Transverse Coherence

Definition: The lateral distance along a wavefront over which there is acomplete dephasing between two waves, of the same wavelength, whichoriginate from two separate points in space.

λ

D

∆θ

2LT

P

R

∆θ

If we assume that the two wavesoriginate from points with a smallangular separation ∆θ, Thetransverse coherence length is givenby:

λ

2LT= tan ∆θ ≈ ∆θ

D

R= tan ∆θ ≈ ∆θ

LT =λR

2D

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 8 / 17

Page 56: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Coherence Lengths at the APS

For a typical 3rd generation undulator source, such as at the AdvancedPhoton Source the vertical source size is D = 100µm and we are typicallyR = 50m away with our experiment. If we assume a typical wavelength ofλ = 1A, and a monochromator resolution of ∆λ/λ = 10−5 we have for thevertical direction:

LL =λ2

2∆λ

2· λ

∆λ=

1× 10−10

2 · 10−5= 5µm

LT =λR

2D

=(1× 10−10) · 50

2 · (100× 10−6)= 25µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 9 / 17

Page 57: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Coherence Lengths at the APS

For a typical 3rd generation undulator source, such as at the AdvancedPhoton Source the vertical source size is D = 100µm and we are typicallyR = 50m away with our experiment. If we assume a typical wavelength ofλ = 1A, and a monochromator resolution of ∆λ/λ = 10−5 we have for thevertical direction:

LL =λ2

2∆λ

2· λ

∆λ=

1× 10−10

2 · 10−5= 5µm

LT =λR

2D

=(1× 10−10) · 50

2 · (100× 10−6)= 25µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 9 / 17

Page 58: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Coherence Lengths at the APS

For a typical 3rd generation undulator source, such as at the AdvancedPhoton Source the vertical source size is D = 100µm and we are typicallyR = 50m away with our experiment. If we assume a typical wavelength ofλ = 1A, and a monochromator resolution of ∆λ/λ = 10−5 we have for thevertical direction:

LL =λ2

2∆λ=λ

2· λ

∆λ

=1× 10−10

2 · 10−5= 5µm

LT =λR

2D

=(1× 10−10) · 50

2 · (100× 10−6)= 25µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 9 / 17

Page 59: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Coherence Lengths at the APS

For a typical 3rd generation undulator source, such as at the AdvancedPhoton Source the vertical source size is D = 100µm and we are typicallyR = 50m away with our experiment. If we assume a typical wavelength ofλ = 1A, and a monochromator resolution of ∆λ/λ = 10−5 we have for thevertical direction:

LL =λ2

2∆λ=λ

2· λ

∆λ=

1× 10−10

2 · 10−5

= 5µm

LT =λR

2D

=(1× 10−10) · 50

2 · (100× 10−6)= 25µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 9 / 17

Page 60: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Coherence Lengths at the APS

For a typical 3rd generation undulator source, such as at the AdvancedPhoton Source the vertical source size is D = 100µm and we are typicallyR = 50m away with our experiment. If we assume a typical wavelength ofλ = 1A, and a monochromator resolution of ∆λ/λ = 10−5 we have for thevertical direction:

LL =λ2

2∆λ=λ

2· λ

∆λ=

1× 10−10

2 · 10−5= 5µm

LT =λR

2D

=(1× 10−10) · 50

2 · (100× 10−6)= 25µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 9 / 17

Page 61: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Coherence Lengths at the APS

For a typical 3rd generation undulator source, such as at the AdvancedPhoton Source the vertical source size is D = 100µm and we are typicallyR = 50m away with our experiment. If we assume a typical wavelength ofλ = 1A, and a monochromator resolution of ∆λ/λ = 10−5 we have for thevertical direction:

LL =λ2

2∆λ=λ

2· λ

∆λ=

1× 10−10

2 · 10−5= 5µm

LT =λR

2D

=(1× 10−10) · 50

2 · (100× 10−6)= 25µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 9 / 17

Page 62: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Coherence Lengths at the APS

For a typical 3rd generation undulator source, such as at the AdvancedPhoton Source the vertical source size is D = 100µm and we are typicallyR = 50m away with our experiment. If we assume a typical wavelength ofλ = 1A, and a monochromator resolution of ∆λ/λ = 10−5 we have for thevertical direction:

LL =λ2

2∆λ=λ

2· λ

∆λ=

1× 10−10

2 · 10−5= 5µm

LT =λR

2D=

(1× 10−10) · 50

2 · (100× 10−6)

= 25µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 9 / 17

Page 63: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Coherence Lengths at the APS

For a typical 3rd generation undulator source, such as at the AdvancedPhoton Source the vertical source size is D = 100µm and we are typicallyR = 50m away with our experiment. If we assume a typical wavelength ofλ = 1A, and a monochromator resolution of ∆λ/λ = 10−5 we have for thevertical direction:

LL =λ2

2∆λ=λ

2· λ

∆λ=

1× 10−10

2 · 10−5= 5µm

LT =λR

2D=

(1× 10−10) · 50

2 · (100× 10−6)= 25µm

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 9 / 17

Page 64: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

X-Ray Tube Schematics

Fixed anode tube

Rotating anode tube

• low power

• low maintenance

• high power

• high maintenance

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 10 / 17

Page 65: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

X-Ray Tube Schematics

Fixed anode tube Rotating anode tube

• low power

• low maintenance

• high power

• high maintenance

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 10 / 17

Page 66: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

X-Ray Tube Spectrum

• Minimum wavelength(maximum energy) setby acceleratingpotential

• Bremßtrahlungradiation providessmooth background(charged particledeceleration)

• Highest intensity at the characteristic fluorescence emission energy ofthe anode material

• Unpolarized, incoherent x-rays emitted in all directions from anodesurface, must be collimated with slits

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 11 / 17

Page 67: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

X-Ray Tube Spectrum

• Minimum wavelength(maximum energy) setby acceleratingpotential

• Bremßtrahlungradiation providessmooth background(charged particledeceleration)

• Highest intensity at the characteristic fluorescence emission energy ofthe anode material

• Unpolarized, incoherent x-rays emitted in all directions from anodesurface, must be collimated with slits

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 11 / 17

Page 68: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

X-Ray Tube Spectrum

• Minimum wavelength(maximum energy) setby acceleratingpotential

• Bremßtrahlungradiation providessmooth background(charged particledeceleration)

• Highest intensity at the characteristic fluorescence emission energy ofthe anode material

• Unpolarized, incoherent x-rays emitted in all directions from anodesurface, must be collimated with slits

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 11 / 17

Page 69: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

X-Ray Tube Spectrum

• Minimum wavelength(maximum energy) setby acceleratingpotential

• Bremßtrahlungradiation providessmooth background(charged particledeceleration)

• Highest intensity at the characteristic fluorescence emission energy ofthe anode material

• Unpolarized, incoherent x-rays emitted in all directions from anodesurface, must be collimated with slits

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 11 / 17

Page 70: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

X-Ray Tube Spectrum

• Minimum wavelength(maximum energy) setby acceleratingpotential

• Bremßtrahlungradiation providessmooth background(charged particledeceleration)

• Highest intensity at the characteristic fluorescence emission energy ofthe anode material

• Unpolarized, incoherent x-rays emitted in all directions from anodesurface, must be collimated with slits

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 11 / 17

Page 71: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Synchrotron Sources

Bending magnet

• Wide horizontal beam

• Broad spectrum to highenergies

Undulator

• Highly collimated beam

• Highly peaked spectrumwith harmonics

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 12 / 17

Page 72: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Synchrotron Sources

Bending magnet

• Wide horizontal beam

• Broad spectrum to highenergies

Undulator

• Highly collimated beam

• Highly peaked spectrumwith harmonics

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 12 / 17

Page 73: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Synchrotron Sources

Bending magnet

• Wide horizontal beam

• Broad spectrum to highenergies

Undulator

• Highly collimated beam

• Highly peaked spectrumwith harmonics

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 12 / 17

Page 74: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Synchrotron Sources

Bending magnet

• Wide horizontal beam

• Broad spectrum to highenergies

Undulator

• Highly collimated beam

• Highly peaked spectrumwith harmonics

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 12 / 17

Page 75: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Synchrotron Sources

Bending magnet

• Wide horizontal beam

• Broad spectrum to highenergies

Undulator

• Highly collimated beam

• Highly peaked spectrumwith harmonics

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 12 / 17

Page 76: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Synchrotron Sources

Bending magnet

• Wide horizontal beam

• Broad spectrum to highenergies

Undulator

• Highly collimated beam

• Highly peaked spectrumwith harmonics

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 12 / 17

Page 77: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Bending Magnet Spectra

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 1e+050

1e+13

2e+13

3e+13

APS

NSLS

ALS

ESRF

Lower energy sources, such as NSLS have lower peak energy and higherintensity at the peak.Higher energy sources, such as APS have higher energy spectrum and areonly off by a factor of 2 intensity at low energy.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 13 / 17

Page 78: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Bending Magnet Spectra

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 1e+050

1e+13

2e+13

3e+13

APS

NSLS

ALS

ESRF

Lower energy sources, such as NSLS have lower peak energy and higherintensity at the peak.

Higher energy sources, such as APS have higher energy spectrum and areonly off by a factor of 2 intensity at low energy.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 13 / 17

Page 79: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Bending Magnet Spectra

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 1e+050

1e+13

2e+13

3e+13

APS

NSLS

ALS

ESRF

Lower energy sources, such as NSLS have lower peak energy and higherintensity at the peak.Higher energy sources, such as APS have higher energy spectrum and areonly off by a factor of 2 intensity at low energy.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 13 / 17

Page 80: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Bending Magnet Spectra

100 1000 10000 1e+051e+05

1e+10

1e+15

APS

NSLS

ALS

ESRF

Logarithmic scale shows clearly how much more energetic and intense thebending magnet sources at the 6 GeV and 7 GeV sources are.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 14 / 17

Page 81: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Bending Magnet Spectra

100 1000 10000 1e+051e+05

1e+10

1e+15

APS

NSLS

ALS

ESRF

Logarithmic scale shows clearly how much more energetic and intense thebending magnet sources at the 6 GeV and 7 GeV sources are.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 14 / 17

Page 82: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

cγ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 83: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

c

γ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 84: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

cγ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 85: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

cγ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 86: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

cγ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2

−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 87: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

cγ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 88: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

cγ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 89: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

cγ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 90: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

cγ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 91: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Review of Special Relativity

v

β =v

cγ =

√1

1− β2

E = γmc2

β =

√1− 1

γ2−→ β ≈ 1− 1

2

1

γ2

use binomial expansion since 1/γ2 << 1

Let’s calculate these quantitiesfor an electron at NSLS andAPS

me = 0.511 MeV/c2

NSLS: E = 1.5 GeV

γ =1.5× 109

0.511× 106= 2935

APS: E = 7.0 GeV

γ =7.0× 109

0.511× 106= 13700

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 15 / 17

Page 92: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

“Headlight” Effect

In electron rest frame:

emission is symmetric about theaxis of the acceleration vector

In lab frame:

emission is pushed into the direc-tion of motion of the electron

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 16 / 17

Page 93: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

“Headlight” Effect

In electron rest frame:

emission is symmetric about theaxis of the acceleration vector

In lab frame:

emission is pushed into the direc-tion of motion of the electron

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 16 / 17

Page 94: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Relativistic Emission

1/γv

a

the electron is in constant trans-verse acceleration due to theLorentz force from the magneticfield of the bending magnet

~F = e~v × ~B = me~a

the aperture angle of the radiationcone is 1/γ

the angular frequency of the elec-tron in the ring is ωo ≈ 106 andthe cutoff energy for emission is

Emax ≈ γ3ωo

for the APS, with γ ≈ 104 we have

Emax ≈ (104)3 · 106 = 1018

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 17 / 17

Page 95: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Relativistic Emission

1/γv

a

the electron is in constant trans-verse acceleration due to theLorentz force from the magneticfield of the bending magnet

~F = e~v × ~B = me~a

the aperture angle of the radiationcone is 1/γ

the angular frequency of the elec-tron in the ring is ωo ≈ 106 andthe cutoff energy for emission is

Emax ≈ γ3ωo

for the APS, with γ ≈ 104 we have

Emax ≈ (104)3 · 106 = 1018

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 17 / 17

Page 96: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Relativistic Emission

1/γv

a

the electron is in constant trans-verse acceleration due to theLorentz force from the magneticfield of the bending magnet

~F = e~v × ~B = me~a

the aperture angle of the radiationcone is 1/γ

the angular frequency of the elec-tron in the ring is ωo ≈ 106

andthe cutoff energy for emission is

Emax ≈ γ3ωo

for the APS, with γ ≈ 104 we have

Emax ≈ (104)3 · 106 = 1018

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 17 / 17

Page 97: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Relativistic Emission

1/γv

a

the electron is in constant trans-verse acceleration due to theLorentz force from the magneticfield of the bending magnet

~F = e~v × ~B = me~a

the aperture angle of the radiationcone is 1/γ

the angular frequency of the elec-tron in the ring is ωo ≈ 106 andthe cutoff energy for emission is

Emax ≈ γ3ωo

for the APS, with γ ≈ 104 we have

Emax ≈ (104)3 · 106 = 1018

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 17 / 17

Page 98: Today’s Outline - January 17, 2012

Relativistic Emission

1/γv

a

the electron is in constant trans-verse acceleration due to theLorentz force from the magneticfield of the bending magnet

~F = e~v × ~B = me~a

the aperture angle of the radiationcone is 1/γ

the angular frequency of the elec-tron in the ring is ωo ≈ 106 andthe cutoff energy for emission is

Emax ≈ γ3ωo

for the APS, with γ ≈ 104 we have

Emax ≈ (104)3 · 106 = 1018

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Spring 2012 January 17, 2012 17 / 17