16
Presentation outline Present seed system in Bangladesh Lacunae in the system Recommendations for policy

Towards innovation and growth in Bangladesh’s seed sector by Firdousi Naher

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Presentation outline

• Present seed system in Bangladesh

• Lacunae in the system

• Recommendations for policy

High demand for commercial seed across income groups

4752

88

100

5143

50

3135

89 87

5159

46

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Aman rice Boro rice Wheat Maize Pulses Oilseeds Potato

Pe

rce

nt

Proportion of farmers who purchased seed, 2011-12

Poorest 20% Richest 20%Source: Authors, based on data from Ahmed (2013)

High rates of modern variety adoption

73 89

100

6 14

29

65

2

11 9425 86 71 35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Aman rice Boro rice Wheat Maize Pulses Oilseeds Potato

Pe

rce

nt

Proportion of farmers using traditional varieties, modern varieties and hybrids, 2011-12

Modern variety Hybrid Traditional varietiesSource: Authors, based on data from Ahmed (2013)

Effective seed policy reforms• 1971-1993: formal seed sector under public domain-BADC

• 1977: Seeds Ordinance– Regulation for standards of seed quality

– Stipulates the role and functions of the NSB and SCA

• 1993: National Seed Policy– Liberalization of formal seed market

– Limit of BADC seed production to notified crops only

– Gradual withdrawal of BADC from seed production of non-notified crops

– Alignment of BADC seed prices to better reflect its costs

• 1997, 2005: Seeds (Amendment) Act– Mandatory registration for new varieties of notified and non-notified crops– Only public agencies allowed to undertake variety development of notified crops

• Seed Rules 1998– Relaxation of mandatory requirements for seed certification

– Introduction of truthfully labeled seed marketing

Rapid growth in private sector participation

79 6 41 1121 94 59 890

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Boro rice Maize Potato Vegetables

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Proportion of commercial seed distributed by public and private sectors in 2011-12

Public sector Private sectorSource: Authors, based on data from Seed Wing, Ministry of Agriculture

Significant private investment in introduction of new products

116 1160

1064

0

500

1000

1500

1971-93 1994-2012

Nu

mb

er

Registered vegetable cultivars

Public

Private

519

0

98

0

50

100

150

1971-93 1994-2012

Nu

mb

er

Registered maize varieties and hybrids

PublicPrivate

3

89

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1994-2012N

um

be

r

Registered rice hybrids

Public

Private

Source: Authors, based on SCA’s approved list of varieties

Private distribution and marketing

51

6054

14

6

46 4754

4839

43

85 86

53 53

45

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Aus rice Aman rice Boro rice Wheat Maize Pulses Oilseeds Potato

Pe

rce

nt

Farmers’ sources of seed, 2011-12

Own/gift Seed dealer/pvt shop BADC outlet

Source: Authors, based on data from Ahmed (2013)

Public and private investment in R&D• BRRI, BARI, other BARC institutes continue to invest in R&D

– New abiotic stress tolerance traits in rice (drought, submergence)

– New aman and boro season rice cultivars; new boro hybrids

– The world’s first zinc-enriched rice

– First country in South Asia to start commercial planting of insect-resistant Bt brinjal in 2013

• A few firms are also investing in R&D (esp. vegetable variety development)

• Even NGOs are investing in R&D (BRAC/hybrid rice, maize, vegetables)

But significant challenges ahead

1. Slow varietal turnover rate

2. Crowding-out effect of BADC

3. Limits of complementary investment in extension

4. Weak incentives for private R&D investment

5. Seed quality issues

Slow varietal turnover rate• Average age of top five rice varieties is about 20 years

• High reliance on older modern varieties• BRRI dhan 28 and 29 (20 yrs old!) are the most popular rice boro varieties in all but 1

division

• BRRI dhan 11 (32 yrs old!) is the most popular aman rice variety in 5 divisions

21 20 2019

0

5

10

15

20

Marginal Small Medium Large

Year

s

Landholding size

Average age of top 5 rice varieties under cultivation, by farmers’ landholding size

Source: Authors, based on data from Ahmed (2013)

Crowding-out effects of BADC

– BADC production of certified and truthfully labeled seed for non-notified crops increasingdespite 1993 NSP

– BADC continues seed production in crops where private sector has a well-established advantage e.g., hybrid maize/hybrid veg/ hybrid rice

– BADC continues to price seed below production cost

Limited reach of extension services

6.5

4.8

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Visited by DAEworker

Received adviceon seed

Pe

rce

nt

Share of farmers who received advice on seed from DAE

1.4

5.5

8.8

11.2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Marginal Small Medium Large

Pe

rce

nt

Landholding size

Share of farmers received advice on seed from DAE

Source: Authors, based on data from Ahmed (2013)

Weak incentives for private R&D investment

• Private firms discouraged from conducting R&D on any notified crop (hybrid rice is the exception)

• Plant Variety and Farmers’ Rights Protection Act proposed in 1998 but yet not approved

• Concerns about private sector access to public germplasm

• Limits of public R&D spillovers from rice-centric priorities

Seed quality issues

• Seed Certification Agency has limited point-of-sale inspection capacity

– Only 30 field offices and 6 regional testing laboratories

• BADC has its own quality control system but many private firms lack capacity for quality control

• Punitive provisions for fraudulent seed practices are lenient and are seldom enforced

• Capacity for maintenance breeding at the regional level is low

Recommendations for the future

• Better decision-making tools– High resolution, centrally managed public data on key seed

metrics

• Stronger innovation incentives– More rational variety testing and release process

– Coordination among NARS, SCA, DAE and NSB

– Harmonized regulatory system with neighboring countries

Recommendations for the future

• A level playing field for the private sector– Withdrawal of BADC from competitive parts of the seed market

– Collaborative research and improved access to public germplasm for firms

– Better representation from firms/farmers’ groups on Variety Release Committee

• Stronger seed quality control– point-of-sale inspection and market surveillance, effective fines

• Greater, more effective investment in research and extension