16
Underbalanced Coiled Tubing Drilling Case Study: Drilling Larger Hole Sizes in Underbalanced Conditions and Ensuring Hole Cleaning SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen, 12-13 November 2014 Toni Miszewski, Managing Director, AnTech Ltd © AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20 th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 1

Underbalanced Coiled Tubing Drilling Case Study: Drilling ... · Underbalanced Coiled Tubing Drilling Case Study: Drilling Larger Hole Sizes in Underbalanced Conditions and Ensuring

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Underbalanced Coiled Tubing Drilling Case Study:

Drilling Larger Hole Sizes in Underbalanced Conditions and Ensuring Hole Cleaning

SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen, 12-13 November 2014

Toni Miszewski, Managing Director, AnTech Ltd

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 1

Well Description

> Well located in the Paris basin, France

> Wells in the field are depleted oil wells in a carbonate reservoir and have to be pumped.

> Wells produce with a high water cut

> Thin payzone

> Barefoot completion

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 2

> Tap into an un-drained pocket of the reservoir

Why CTD:

> Only drilling method that can offer continuous underbalance

> Higher ROP

> Well fully contained during drilling

> Based on a successful 4-well CTD program in 2007

Overall Objective and rational for CTD

Plan Plot

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 3

Specific Program Objectives

> Perform all work with zero HS&E incidents

> Initiate open hole side-track inside the porous reservoir boundaries, 4m thickness

> Drill at least 300m long drain

> Keep the well underbalanced and drill in one run

> Capture technical learning and best practices

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 4

Different Well Geometry

PREVIOUS WELL THIS WELL

7” Casing 7” Casing

6-1/8” OH4-1/8” OH

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 5

Planning for success

> Tubing Forces

> Getting weight to bit> Hook load

> Hydraulics

> Bottom Hole circulating pressure (BHCP)> Hole cleaning ability

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 6

Previous well: 2-3/8” CT, 3” BHABHCP vs Injection Rates 2-3/8 CT, 3” CTD BHA

Gas Injection Rate (Ncum/min)

BH

CP

(Bar

)

Formation Pressure

Target BHCP

Liquid Phase 223.6 l/min

Cleanability

Liquid Phase 260.4 l/min

Cleanability

Liquid Phase 297.2 l/min

Cleanability

Liquid Phase 334.0 l/min

Cleanability

Liquid Phase 370.8 l/min

Cleanability

Motor Max Rate 140 USGPM

Motor Min Rate 60 USGPM

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 7

New well: 2-7/8” CT, 5” BHA

BHCP vs Injection Rates 2-7/8 CT, 5” CTD BHA

BH

CP

(Bar

)

Gas Injection Rate (Ncum/min)

Formation Pressure

Target BHCP

Liquid Phase 315.6 l/min

Cleanability

Liquid Phase 378.7 l/min

Cleanability

Liquid Phase 441.8 l/min

Cleanability

Liquid Phase 505.0 l/min

Cleanability

Liquid Phase 568.1 l/min

Cleanability

Liquid Phase 631.2 l/min

Cleanability

Motor Max Rate 240 USGPM

Motor Min Rate 120 USGPM

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 8

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen

9

Results

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 9

Drilling Results: Plan View

Plan Plot

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

-1000 -900 -800 -700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0

N-S

(m

)

E-W (m)

Original Well Plan Existing Drilled 140927 Updated Well PlanUpdated Well Plan

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 10

1840

1845

1850

1855

1860

1865

1870

1875

1880

1885

1890

1895

1900

250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200

TV

D (

m)

Vertical Section (m)

1

2 3

Drilling Results: Section View

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 11

Underbalance

Lesson learned: separator capacity needs to match ROP capability

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 12

Weight-on-Bit Comparison

Comparison of Predicted Max WOB and Measured WOB

Measured Depth (m)

Wei

gh

t on

Bit

(N)

Measured

Predicted

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 13

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

BH

CP

(B

ar)

N2 Rate (Ncum/min)

Comparing Predicted & Observed Steady State BHCP for 2-phase Circulation Liquid rate fixed at 400 l/m, 3 N2 rates

Formation Pressure

Target BHCP

Predicted Steady State

BHCPObserved BHCP (10500

data points)

Liquid Properties:

Diesel

BHCP Comparison

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 14

Objectives vs Results

Objective Result

Perform all work with zero HS&E incidents Achieved

Initiate open hole side-track inside the porous reservoir boundaries 4m thick Achieved

Drill at least 300m long drain Achieved (438m)

Keep the well underbalanced and drill in one run. Not achieved

Capture technical learning and best practices. Achieved

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 15

With thanks to Lundin Petroleum

© AnTech 2014 SPE ICoTA 20th European Well Intervention Conference – Aberdeen 16