Upload
state-of-utah
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
1/28
March/April 2011
Utah Demographics: s t a t e w iD
e
c e n s Us
Da t a !
Department of Workforce Servicesnew eco omic, social, demographic a d housi g i fo for all of Utah
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
2/282 March/April 2011
DWS-03-44-0311
Trendlines
jobs.utah.gov
Utah Department of Workforce Services
Executive DirectorKristen Cox
Work orce Research and AnalysisRick Little, Director
Kimberley Bartel, Editor
ContributorsMark Knold
John MathewsJane Gardner Carrie MayneJim Robson
Lecia LangstonLinda Marling Church
Kimberley BartelJohn Krantz
Ryan Kanaley
DesignerPat Swenson
Trendlines
is published every other month by theUtah Department o Work orce Services,
Work orce Research and Analysis. To read,download, or print this publication ( ree),
see our Internet site: http://jobs.utah.gov/wi. Click on Publications then select the one
you want rom the list.
To obtain additional printed copies or to
subscribe to Trendlines contact:Department of Workforce Services
Attn: WRA140 East 300 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Telephone: (801) 526-9462Fax: (801) 526-9238
Email: [email protected]
The Workforce Research and AnalysisDivision generates accurate, timely, and
understandable data and analyses toprovide knowledge o ever-changingwork orce environments that support
sound planning anddecision-making.
Equal Opportunity Employer/ProgramAuxiliary aids and services are available upon request to individuals with
disabilities by calling (801) 526-9240. Individuals with speechand/or hearing impairments may call the Relay Utah by dialing 711.
Spanish Relay Utah: 1-888-346-3162.
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
3/28jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines
5 Economy Slowly Starting to Improve Wasatch Front and Statewide
6Extended Unemployment Benefts
in Utah The Outlook
8County Rankings rom the American
Community Survey Five-Year EstimatesEconomic Insight
10Insu fcient
Job OpportunitiesNational News
12 Doubling Up in Recessionary TimesInsider News
14Comparing Davis County
Communities with the ACS SurveyEconomic News
18Working Women in Small Utah Counties
What's Happening
20Your Business Can Play an Important Role
in Utah's Work orce Development DWS News
22Health Care Aides: Helping
Those in NeedOccupations
24 Sources o Income in Eastern Utah The Outskirts
26 Box Elder CountyCounty Highlight
27 Just the Facts...Rate Update
contents
Statewide
Census Data:See page 4 for important information
about this issue!
Ma rch /A pri l 20 11
Utah Demographics:
STATEWIDE
CEN SUS
DATA!
Department of Work force Services
N ew e c onomic , so c ia l, d e mo g r ap hic and ho using inf o f or a ll o f U ta h
pg. 20
pg. 8
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
4/284 March/April 2011
American Community SurveyFirstRelease o 5-year Estimates
For the rst time in almost 10 years, new economic,social, demographic and housing in ormationis available or all communities and counties inUtah. The American Community Survey (ACS) is acontinuous monthly survey o U.S. households thathas been conducted since 2005. With the U.S. CensusBureau having discontinued the use o the long ormin the decennial census in avor o the AmericanCommunity Survey (ACS), we can now look orwardto new data or all communities within the UnitedStates every year.
Within Utah, more than 1,200 households aresurveyed each month as part o the ACS. Five years o data collection are combined or these tabulations sothat a su cient number o households are includedto make reasonably reliable estimates or smallpopulation areascommunities, towns and censustracts. Hundreds o community characteristics areestimated and made available in tables and throughdata pro les.
This rst release o ve-year estimatescoveringthe time period 2005 through 2009providedemographic, social, economic and housingcharacteristics used by business, community, andgovernmental leaders or economic development andplanning purposes. Each year moving orward, thedata rom the oldest year will be dropped, and a newyear o responses added. At the end o this year, thesecond ve-year set o ACS estimates covering 2006through 2010 will be released.
For large population areas, with 65,000 or moreinhabitants, the number o households sampled eachyear is su cient to make characteristic estimateswith one year o data. Communities with at least25,000 inhabitants have the most recent three yearso data combined or estimation. For example, theState o Utah, with 2.8 million people, has new ve,three, and one-year estimates produced each year. Arelatively small community, such as the city o Nephi(population o about 5,500), will have only ve-yearestimates each year.
IMPORTANTIn ormation about this issue:
Hundreds o communitycharacteristics areestimated and madeavailable in tables and
through data pro les.
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
5/28jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines
wasatch front and statewide | by mark knold, chief economist
It has taken awhile,but the initial stepso a sel -sustainingeconomic recovery maybe taking hold. This isa national economicview, and since Utahseconomy seems to becurrently tied to thenational economic per-
ormance, this ndingshould also apply toUtah. A sel -sustainingeconomic recovery isone characterized with both rising employ-ment and consumer spending.
Even with this improvement in theeconomy, the unemployment rate maynot show much improvement as wemove through 2011. Utahs year-over-
year employment growth rate is currentlyaround 1.0 percent, and is expected to risethroughout 2011 to around 2.0 percentby years end. Un ortunately, that is notenough growth to make much, i any, denton the states unemployment rate.
Utah has lost around 85,000 jobs duringthis recession. Unemployed have risen
rom roughly 45,000 to 102,000, produc-ing an unemployment rate around 7.4
percent. I marginallyattached (occasionallylooking) and discour-aged unemployed werealso included, the un-employed would riseto around 130,000, andthe rate to roughly 9.2percent. A 2.0 employ-ment growth rate byyears end would meana gain o around 22,000o the 85,000 lost jobs.Job growth will lower
the ranks o the currently unemployed, butit will also encourage some o the discour-aged workers who le t the labor market tostart looking or work again, thus possiblykeeping the volume o those unemployedin the o cial unemployment rate calcula-tion unchanged. In other words, the pro-
jected job growth will move people o unemployment, but discouraged workersstarting to look or work again may keepthe unemployment rate rom alling verymuch.
Nearly all industries are expected toexperience job growth in 2011, evenconstruction and manu acturing. The onlyindustry not expected to see growth is
nancial activities.
Economy SlowlyStarting to Improve
Most industries are expected to experience job growth this year.
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
6/286 March/April 2011
he outlook | by mark knold, chief economist
The recent recession has pushedUtahs unemployment rate toits highest level in over 25 years,meaning many people are ling orunemployment insurance bene ts.And with the depth and duration o therecessions consequences lingeringwith virtually no job creation to re-employ workersmany people haveexhausted their regular state-suppliedunemployment bene ts and havemoved onto the ederally- undedextended unemployment bene ts.
This movement onto extended ben-e ts blossomed around April 2009.The accompanying map shows wherethe extent o this activity has oc-curred in Utah, by Census tracts, andis quanti ed between April 2009 andOctober 2010. Across that time rame,around 53,800 unemployed led oran extended unemployment bene t.
Geographic areas emerge where un-employment activities and durationare more prevalent. These include thewest and southwest sides o Salt LakeCounty, northern and western UtahCounty, and eastern Tooele County.O the Wasatch Front, hot spots oc-cur in two Census tracts in Washing-ton County, and one in the energypatch o Uintah County.
When isolating the Salt Lake-Utah-Tooele County hot spots, they areareas that within the past 15 yearswere underdeveloped but have nowtransitioned into populated newhome areas. For example, in northernUtah County, 15 years ago not onlywere Saratoga Springs and EagleMountain not developed, they didntexist as towns. Now they are townso size. Many who have settled thereare young, rst-time home buyersseeking availability and a ordability.
I one incorporates the normalpattern observed during recessionarylayo s onto thisyounger, lesstenured workers are usually the
rst to be laid o then the layo activities should show up more inthese younger communities. This tsthe pattern seen rom the Salt Lake,Utah, and Tooele county pro les onthe map.
In Washington County, the Censustracts east o I-15 that include thecities o Washington and Hurricanealso have high quantities o extendedbene t lers. Washington Countyhas been hit hard by this recession.Having experienced the largest hous-ing bubble in the state, WashingtonCounty began this recession rst and
has been mired in it the longest. Tohave as many extended bene t lers
rom this area match the counts inthe more heavily populated WasatchFront speaks loudly toward the dis-proportionate amount o recession-ary impact this county is enduring.Again, construction workers are themost prominent lers in those tracts.
As or Uintah County, energy indus-try layo s are the primary reason
or high unemployment claims. Theenergy price rise o 2007 and 2008spurred energy-industry employ-ment to its highest levels ever in thatcounty.
When energy prices collapsed in2009, activity slowed and layo s ol-lowed. It is only recently that activityhas begun to resume, but in the in-terim, many o these laid o workerswere out o jobs long enough to reach
into the extended unemploymentbene ts.
Energy prices have rebounded andemployment gains are resulting, sounemployment bene ciaries are get-ting re-employed. But the construc-tion industry is still fat, with notmuch activity to move its idled labor
orce onto payrolls.
in Utah Unemployment BeneftsExtended
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
7/28jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines
301 to 400
401 to 600
Census tracts
EXTENDED
CLAIMS201 to 300
101 to 200
2 to 100
Workers fling orextended unemploymentbenefts:
70% are male
65% are less than age 45
The constructionindustryadded more unemployedworkers than any otherindustry, ollowed by
administrative services (telemarketing andemployment supply agencies)and then manufacturing andretail trade
Extended Unemployment Benefts
Initial Claims by Census TractApril 2009 October 2010
Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services.
White space assumes no initial claims
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
8/288 March/April 2011
economic insight | by lecia parks langston, economist
Perhaps youve seen the Nerd Venn Diagram that has beenfoating around the blogosphere lately. It de nes nerds,geeks, dweebs, dorks based on three characteristicssocial ineptitude, intelligence, and obsession. Now, Ivealways considered mysel a data geek and according to thediagram that means Im intelligent and obsessive. I dontknow about the intelligence part, but when it comes to
data, Im certainly obsessive. I I had my way, Id get to llthis entire publication with graphs and insights about the Census
Bureaus recently released ve-year estimates rom the AmericanCommunity Survey.
Theres so much great in ormation available, particularly i yourcounty is small, and you havent seen any demographic data
since the 2000 Census. But, Ive only got a ew pages to ll.So, Im providing some county-ranking tidbits that I hope willstimulate you to do a little obsessive data-delving o your own.This data refects estimates or 2005-2009.
Kane County has the oldest median age (44 years); UtahCounty the youngest (23 years).
Beaver County maintains the highest share o population overthe age o 85 (3 percent); Daggett County the lowest (0.6 per-cent).
Rich County shows the top percentage o population in theWhite/Not Hispanic or Latino category (97 percent); SanJuan County, with its high share o Native Americans, has thelowest--only 39 percent.
On average, Wayne County workers have the shortest commutetime (11 minutes); Tooele County workers, the longest (29minutes).
Utah County households are the largest (average o 3.8 in-dividuals); Daggett County households are the smallest (2.1individuals).
Gar eld County demonstrates the lowest percentage o never-married men over the age o 15 (10 percent); Utah County, thehighest (38 percent).
County Rankings from theAmerican Community Survey Five-Year Estimates:
enough to excite anydata geek!
Do some obsessivedata-delving of
your own!
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
9/28jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlinesjobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines
On the other hand, Piute County exhibits the low-est percentage o never-married women over theage o 15 (8 percent); Cache County, the highest
(34 percent). Washington County has the highest percentage o
homes built since 2005 (9 percent); Emery County,the lowest (0.3 percent).
Piute County shows the highest percentage o vet-erans in the population (16 percent); Utah Countythe smallest (6 percent).
In Gar eld County, over 60 percent o marriedcouples are both in the labor orce, the highest ratein the state. In Piute County, both spouses are inthe labor market only 37 percent o the time.
Morgan County ranks number one or the per-centage o households that are married couple
amilies (77 percent) while only 48 percent o Grand County households include a marriedcouple.
Morgan County also tops the list or the percent-age o workers commuting outside o their countyo residence or work60 percent cross countylines or employment. On the other end o thespectrum, less than 5 percent o Grand Countyemployees leave the county or work.
With more than 48 percent o adults over 25with at least a Bachelors degree, Summit Countyresidents are the best educated in Utah. BeaverCounty residents have the lowest percentage o adults with a Bachelors degreeless than 12percent.
To access the American Community Survey ve-yearestimates or your county, go to: http:// act nder.census.gov and click on get data under the American Community Survey heading.
Percent of Households With One or More
Under 18 Years2005-2009
MorganTooele
JuabDavisUtah
Box ElderDuchesneWasatchSan Juan
UintahIron
CacheWeber
Salt LakeSevier
SummitEmery
MillardSanpeteGar eldBeaver
WashingtonCarbonWayneGrand
RichKanePiute
Daggett10% 20% 30% 40% 50
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS) 2005-2009.
http://factfinder.census.gov/http://factfinder.census.gov/http://factfinder.census.gov/8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
10/2810 March/April 2011
national news | by jim robson, economist
As 2010 came to an end, there were a number o signsthat U.S. economic activity continued to slowlyimprove. Economic expansion has been o ciallyunderway since June 2009, with moderate increases inthe production o goods and services. Lately, consumercon dence and retail purchases are increasing, and evensome labor market indicators are nally showing signs o improvement.
The modest economic growth during 2010 was primarily
driven by stimulus, both scal policy engineered byCongress and the president and monetary policyconducted by the Federal Reserve Bank. These policieshave been unprecedented, varied, and large. Themainstream economic view or 2011 is that the U.S.economy is success ully transitioning to a sel -sustainingrecovery driven by private domestic consumption andbusiness demand.
While many economic indicators have improved, theseverity o the recession during 2008 and 2009 willhave long lasting e ects. Labor market conditions areimproving but it will likely take several years to bringunemployment rates down to more healthy levels thatare around six percent.
One example o the recent positive labor market news isprovided by job openings. Prior to the recession in 2007,U.S. job openings averaged a little above 4.5 million permonth. When the recession ended in July 2009 they had
allen to a low o 2.4 million per month. Through the endo 2010 they have been trending up, reaching about 3.3million job openings, clearly an improvement but stillbelow pre-recession levels.
By examining job openings relative to the number o unemployed it becomes clear that we need much more
improvement. During 2007, unemployment averagedabout 7 million persons per month. In 2010, U.S.unemployment averaged 14.8 million. In 2007, therewere 1.5 unemployed persons per job opening. At theend o 2009, there were about six persons unemployedper job opening. During 2010 this ratio has graduallyimproved, ending the year at about 4.5 unemployed oreach job opening. De nite improvement, but still a longway to go be ore reaching more normal levels where thereare reasonably good job opportunities or those seekingemployment.
Insu fcientJob Opportunities
Conditions are improving,
but there is still a long way togo be ore reaching normalemployment levels.
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
11/28jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines 1
Number oUnemployed
Persons per JobOpening
(Seasonally Adjusted)
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10
U.S. JobOpenings by
Month(in thousands)
Recession
Though the openings arerising, they are still below
pre-recession levels.
During 2010 this ratiogradually improved,
ending the year at about4.5 unemployed or each
job opening.
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
12/2812 March/April 2011
nsider news | by jim robson, economist
For Utah, a ull year o ACSresponses provides a large
enough sample to make the ullrange o data estimates. With veyears o data or Utah, changes overtime provide insights into how thestate is trans ormed by events.
The Great Recession o 2008/2009 isone such event. In Utah, the housingboom and economic growth peakedin 2006. The economy was slowingduring 2007, with the national(and Utah) recession beginning in
December 2007. Serious nancialsystem di culties during 2008 in the
U.S. and around the world came to ahead in August and September 2008with ull-blown nancial crises hittingthe Utah, U.S. and world economies.Signi cant economic contractionoccurred in most industries or thenext year.
The large increases in unemployedand underemployed, with theresulting declines in incomes and jobopportunities or many individuals
and amilies, has been mani est inloan de aults, bankruptcies, and
housing oreclosures. Nationally,a noticeable e ect o householdsdoubling up has been observed.
Doubling up is where relatives andriends have moved in together
as their only viable alternative tohomelessness. In September 2010,the Census Bureau reported that romthe rst quarter o 2008 to the rstquarter o 2010 there has been an11.6 percent increase in multi- amily
in Recessionary Times
Doubling UpDoubling Up
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
13/28Trendlines 1jobs.utah.gov/wi
households nationally. During thissame period the total number o
households in the U.S. increased byjust 0.6 percent. A related statisticwas a large increase in older childrenliving with their parents. From 2008to 2010 the number o 25 to 34year olds living with their parentsincreased by 8.4 percent ( rom 5.1million to 5.5 million).
Utah data rom the ACS surveyindicates that more people movedin together to share a household
as a result o the recession. Duringthe relative economic prosperity
rom 2000 to 2006, the numbero Utah households increased by2.4 percent per year, while personsin households increase by a lowergrowth rate o 2.0 percent. Thus,
rom 2000 to 2006 the Utah averagehousehold size declined rom 3.13to 3.08 persons per household. Withthe economic slow down in 2007and recession years o 2008/2009 thenumber o Utah households grew 2.2percent per year rom 2006 to 2009,
while persons in households grew by3.0 percent per year. There ore the
average Utah household size duringthis period increased rom 3.08 to3.17 persons per household. In the
uture, as the economy strengthens,job opportunities become moreplenti ul, and unemploymentdeclines, there should be a reverseo this increase o doubling up.Demand above normal populationgrowth should spur household
ormation or both housing rentalsand ownership.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census and AmericanCommunity Survey (ACS).
3.13
3.08
3.11
3.15
3.17
2000Census
2006ACS
2007ACS
2008ACS
2009ACS
2.4% 2.2%2.0%
3.0%
Households Persons in Households
2000 Census to 2006 ACS
2006 ACS to 2009 ACS
Utah Average AnnualPercent Change:
2000 to 2006 compared with 2006 to 2009
Utah Average HouseholdSize
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
14/2814 March/April 2011
economic news | by john mathews, economist
ComparingDavis County Communitieswith the ACS Survey
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2005-2009.
Median Household IncomeDavis County Communities 2005-2009
46,528
47,639
61,713
63,709
64,400
64,811
68,533
68,921
76,111
77,500
78,395
78,459
78,798
80,452
10
Clear eld
Sunset
Layton
Bountiful
Clinton
Woods Cross
North Salt Lake
West Point
West Bountiful
South Weber
Kaysville
Syracuse
Farmington
Centerville
Fruit Heights
The causeway between Antelope Island State Park and Davis County. The foreground is the State Park and the
background is a view of the Wasatch Mountains.
11.7
18.0
21.4
21.4
25.5
27.6
30.1
31.4
31.9
36.1
38.1
39.9
42.2
43.7
52.4
Sunset
Clear eld
Clinton
West Bountiful
West Point
Woods Cross
Syracuse
South Weber
Layton
North Salt Lake
Bountiful
Centerville
Kaysville
Farmington
Fruit Heights
Percent of Persons 25 Years Old and OlderWith a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
Davis County Communities 2005-2009
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
15/28jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines 1Trendlines 1
To demonstrate the type o data availableby community I have selected just a ewdata elements to describe the communi-ties in Davis County. The American FactFinderis the source o the data. Within this source arecommunity data pro les that consist o our cat-egories o in ormation: social, economic, hous-ing and demographic. Hundreds o data pointsare available through these data pro les. We are
going to look at just three in graph but the linkbelow will take you the Census site to view oth-ers o the 15 communities in Davis County.
Educational AttainmentThe rst topic or discussion is educationalattainment. This is the percentage o thepopulation 25 years old and older that haveattained a bachelors degree or higher. Thegraph shows that Fruit Heights has the highestpercentage o college grads with over hal holding a diploma. Thats signi cantly higherthan the state average o 28.7 percent. Sunsethas the lowest proportion with 11.7 percentholding a bachelors degree or higher. In Layton,the largest city in Davis County, 31.7 percent o the population 25 years or over has a degree.
IncomeMedian household income among thecommunities in Davis County shows a wide
range. Households in Fruit Heights had thehighest median income with $105,170, whichwas 30 percent higher than the next highestcommunityCenterville ($80,452). Householdsin Fruit Heights had more than double the levelo median income than those in Clear eld($46,528).
Median AgeUtahs median age (2005-2009 average) was28.5 years, as was Layton Citys median age.The di erence in age across the 15 communitiesspanned 10 years. Bounti ul was the oldest at35.2 years and Clear eld was the youngest witha median age o 25.9 years.
These are just examples o the hundreds o dataelements available or the communities in Utah,and across the nation. I you want to knowabout household size, commuting time, drivingto work alone in the car, per capita income,
mortgage and housing size, population by age,race, gender, ethnicity, and much more, go tothe ACS American FactFinder site below andjust play. Much o the census-sourced data inthe Department o Work orce Services websiteoriginates rom the American CommunitySurvey. Go look.
http://fact nder.census.gov/
Fruit Heights has the mostcollege grads and the
highest median income inthe state. Clear eld hasthe youngest population inUtah, with a median age of 25.9 years.
Median Age of the Population inDavis County Communities 2005-2009
25.9
26.5
26.6
26.9
27.5
27.6
27.6
28.2
28.5
29.1
30.4
31.7
32.1
33.2
35.2
Clear eld
Syracuse
Clinton
West Point
Farmington
Kaysville
Woods Cross
North Salt Lake
Layton
West Bountiful
South Weber
Centerville
Sunset
Fruit Heights
Bountiful
http://factfinder.census.gov/http://factfinder.census.gov/8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
16/2816 March/April 2011
SESP Training Provider Chart
Training Institution GreenConstructionAlternative
Fuels
EnergyManagement/
Ef ciency
RenewableEnergy &
Transmission
Bridgerland Applied TechnologyCollege
Davis Applied Technology College
Salt Lake Community College Southwest Applied TechnologyCollege
Utah State University College of Eastern Utah
Uintah Basin Applied TechnologyCollege
Utah State Energy Sector Partnership Utah Department of WorkforceServices (DWS) was awarded a $4.6 million State Energy Sector Partnership (SESP)grant to develop the workforce force and create jobs in Green Construction,Alternative Fuels, Energy Management/Ef ciency, and Renewable EnergyTransmission in Utah. This project will provide training for 1,400 individuals withthe skills required to work in emerging energy ef ciency and renewable energyindustries. Training will be provided through July 31, 2012.
Find out more at
http://jobs.utah.gov/services/grants/sesp.html
Check out our new
Green Careers publication!
W hat it means to be
gr een and how Utahs
economy is aff ected by
the gr een mov ement
C ar e e r sG r e e n
T R A IN IN G O P PO RT U N IT IES
fo r
A LSO
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
17/28jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines 1
TOP fIve counties forpercent of men that havenever been married:
1. Utah (38.1 percent)2. San Juan (37.8 percent)
3. Cache (37.6 percent)
4. Salt Lake (32.9 percent)
5. Grand (32.2 percent)
Rich County has the lowest percent-age (0.7 percent) of people who areforeign born.
Beaver County has the highest per-centage of people over the age of 85.
The longest work commute time occursin Tooele County (28.5 minutes) and 20percent carpool, 68.6 percent travel bycar, truck, van and 2 percent take pub-lic transportation.
Residents in Wayne County only com-mute 11.1 minutes to work and 0.7%take public transportation, 68.8 percent
travel by car, truck, van, and 7.6 per-cent carpool.
Summit County has thehighest percentage o people 25 and over whohave completed both anadvanced degree (17.5percent) and who havecompleted a bachelorsdegree (48.2 percent).
Counties with a me-dian household incomeabove $60,000: Sum-mit ($83,380), Morgan($70,043), Davis ($65,892),Wasatch ($62,030), andTooele ($60,236).
Iron County has the low-est percentage o owneroccupied housing units(62.5 percent) and MorganCounty has the highest(89.4 percent).
fAcTs from the 2005-2009 AmericanCommunity Survey 5-Year Estimates forCounties in Utah
$
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
18/2818 March/April 2011
what's happening | by carrie mayne, supervising economist
The Census Bureaus ve-year es-timates or the American Com-munity Survey present an op-portunity to more closely understandthe demographic and labor marketcharacteristics across the UnitedStates. Previous releases o ACS datahave only covered the counties withlarger populations, but with ve yearso data now collected, robust observa-tions o smaller rural populations arenow at our ngertips. (For a list o the19 Utah counties newly added to theACS data collection, please see list.)
One particular sub-population o these rural counties that to dateweve known little about (at leastsince the 2000 Census) is working
women. There are both similaritiesand notable di erences when relatingthe economies o rural counties to thestatewide average, so its worthwhileto investigate the comparisons or the
emale labor orce.
According to the ve-year ACSestimates, the labor orce participationrate or 16 to 65 year old women inUtah is just under 69 percent. O the 19 small Utah counties observedhere, only two have a higher rate o women working: Wayne and Gar eld.San Juan exhibits the lowest rate atjust under 53 percent. The averagelabor orce participation rate or thiscollection o counties is 60.5 percent.
Earnings tell an interesting story aswell. O the ull-time wage earners,only in our o the 19 counties dowomen have a higher emale-to-maleearnings ratio than the statewide
average. Women in Utah earnapproximately 70 percent o theirmale counterparts earnings level; onlythe working women in Beaver, Grand,Wayne, and Kane counties are better.Uintah Countys working women arethe worst o this group with less than50 cents to the male dollar, whileKane county women come out on topwith an earnings ratio just under 90percent.
The most common occupations heldby the working women in Utah are:o ce and administrative support oc-cupations (26.4 percent), sales andrelated occupations (12.6 percent),and education, training, and libraryoccupations (9.8 percent). Does this
pattern hold true or the women o smaller counties? The answer turnsout to be yes.
While there are certainly di erenc-es in the economic make-up o therural areas o Utah as comparedto the Wasatch Front, the datashows that women tend togravitate toward these typeso occupations. In act, or allbut two counties (Piute andRich), o ce and administra-tive support occupations ex-hibited signi cantly higherpercentages o the total e-male employment.
Find out more about the de-mographic and economiccharacteristics o womenin Utahs rural counties atthe ollowing link: http://
actfnder.census.gov
working wom nin sm ll U h coun i COUNTIES
With New Data Underthe Five-Year ACS Estimates:
Beaver
Carbon
Daggett
DuchesneEmery
Gar eld
Grand
Iron
Juab
Kane
Millard
Piute
Rich
San JuanSanpete
Sevier
Uintah
Wasatch
Wayne
http://factfinder.census.gov/http://factfinder.census.gov/http://factfinder.census.gov/http://factfinder.census.gov/8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
19/28Trendlines 19jobs.utah.gov/wi
GARFIELD
WAYNE
STATEWIDE
GRAND
WASATCH
KANE
MILLARD
RICH
SEVIER
BEAVERIRON
UINTAH
CARBON
DUCHESNE
EMERY
PIUTE
JUAB
SANPETE
DAGGETT
SAN JUAN 52.8%
55.4%
55.5%
55.5%
56.8%
57.3%
58.0%
58.1%
58.7%
59.8%59.9%
60.1%
60.4%
61.9%
64.4%
66.0%
66.4%
68.8%
70.4%
72.1%
KANE
WAYNE
GRAND
BEAVER
STATEWIDE
PIUTE
SAN JUAN
IRON
MILLARD
SEVIER
JUAB
WASATCH
CARBON
DUCHESNE
SANPETE
DAGGETT
GARFIELD
RICH
EMERY
UINTAH 49.1%
54.0%
55.3%
55.5%
57.6%
57.7%
58.6%
59.7%
61.1%
61.7%
62.3%
65.7%
66.8%
66.9%
67.0%
69.6%
72.7%
82.6%
84.9%
89.6%
F m l L bor ForP r i ip ion R
F m l Full-tim w g e rninga P r n of M l
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey.
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
20/2820 March/April 2011
All Utah companies and organizations areinvited to be a part o Utahs one-stop shop oronline career in ormation. Students and jobseekers use UtahFutures.org to research and organizetheir training, education, and career in ormation inone place. The education and career port olio usersbuild on UtahFutures.org travels with them as theyenter the work orce and advance in their careers.
UtahFutures.org provides a unique opportunity orUtah companies to be pro led on the screen alongside the occupational in ormation viewed by job
seekers and students.The system provides clear in ormation about jobrequirements, earning power and job availability
or hundreds o occupations. Current employmentand labor market in ormation rom the Departmento Work orce Services and Bureau o Labor Statisticshelps connect job seekers with current job openings,as well as provides trend and outlook data or careerso the uture.
Benefts or Employers
Connect with potential employees. Job seekers and
students that are exploring career interests can viewcompany pro les.
Link to your web site with occupation informationin UtahFutures.org. Students and job seekersresearching an occupation will see your companyin ormation along with the occupation listing.
Help provide the present and emerging workforcewith essential in ormation about your industry andoccupations at your business.
Enhance your business exposure and identity withjob seekers, students, and their parents.
Connect with your community. Volunteer, internship,and public speaking opportunities can be a bridgewith local schools and community organizations.
No fee career development for your own employees.Retain and develop your most important assets.
dws news | by kimberley bartel
Your Business. . .
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
21/28jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines 2
. . . Can Playan ImportantRole inUtahs
WorkforceDevelopment
Companies can choose to participatein the Volunteer Exchange withinthe system. The Volunteer Exchangehelps connect business peoplewilling to do volunteer work witheducators needing volunteers.UtahFutures Employer Connectionsprovides an easy way to organizeand track all business-relatedschool-to-career activities in a localarea. You can identi y the type o in ormation, audience, length o
visit, and location that best workswith your availability. Participantsmay update their own in ormationand availability as needed.
Volunteer activities currentlyincluded on the website are dividedinto the ollowing three areas:
School-based activities
Guest Speakers
Career Days/Fairs/Expos
Readers
Tutors
School Volunteers
Mentors
Project Advisors
Student-Created Business Advisor
Business Site Visits/Industry Tours
Work-based learning activities
Job Shadows
Informational Interviews
Mock Interviews
Internships/Clinical Experiences
Service Learning/VolunteerOpportunities
Apprenticeships
Services or educators &schools
Job Shadows for Teachers
Educator Externships
Advisory Committee Members
Donations of Equipment
Staff Development Training
To create yourcompany pro le andget your business inront o the work orceo the uture go toutahfutures.org
and click on UtahEmployer Connections
Registration.
http://utahfutures.org/http://utahfutures.org/http://utahfutures.org/http://utahfutures.org/8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
22/2822 March/April 2011
occupations | by linda marling church, research analyst
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
23/28
http://jobs.utah.gov/http://www.bls.gov/8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
24/2824 March/April 2011
he outskirts | by john krantz, economist
U sing the new 5-year ACS data, this article ocus-es on the sources o income or Eastern Utah,where Eastern Utah re ers to Carbon, Daggett,Duchesne, Emery, Grand, San Juan, and Uintah counties.By looking at the percentages o households receivingparticular types o income, we can develop a better pic-ture o the counties in Eastern Utah.
The ACS identi es ve main types o cash income sources:earnings, Social Security, retirement, SupplementalSecurity Income, and cash public assistance. Among these
ve sources, earnings are received by a higher percentageo households than any other source o income and theyorm the largest part o total household income. This
makes sense because earnings are the wages, salaries, andsel -employment income received by workers. Statewide,86 percent o all households received earnings. In EasternUtah, the percentages o households receiving income asearnings are all lower than or equal to the state average,ranging rom a low o 69 percent in Daggett County to ahigh o 86 percent in Uintah County.
While earnings tells us how many households haveindividuals actively participating in the labor market,Social Security and retirement income can tell ussomething about the percentage o households that haveretirees. Interestingly, the percentages o householdsreceiving Social Security or all o the counties o Eastern Utah are higher than the state average. Anothernoteworthy act is that i we rank households in Eastern
Utah by the percentage receiving Social Security and bythe percentage receiving retirement income, the order
rom high to low is the same or the rst ve counties.This suggests that these counties have older populationsand the ACS data supports this suggestion.Daggett County has the third-highestpercentage o people 65 or older at 17.6percent while Carbon County rankseighth with 13.7 percent.
Supplemental Security Income provides
assistance to elderly and disabled individu-als with very low incomes. We might expectcounties with higher percentages o disabled individuals to have high-er percentages o householdsreceiving Supplemental Secu-rity Income. Un ortunately,there are currently no estimates
or the percentage o disabledindividuals in the countieso Eastern Utah, so wecannot veri y thisclaim.
Sources of Income in
Eastern Utah
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
25/28jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines 2
The last income source considered here is cash public assistance. Thisconsists o cash grants rom government agencies to individualswho typically have very little or no income. The most well-knowngovernment program o this type is Temporary Assistance or Needy
Families (TANF).
On average, only 1.8 percent o households in the State o Utah receivecash public assistance. However, the
percentages o households receiving cashpublic assistance in San Juan and Grand
counties are more than twice the statewideaverage. These relatively high percentagescan be explained in terms o the poverty rate.San Juan County has the highest poverty rate
among Utahs counties and Grand Countys rateranks as the th highest. As we would expect, the
greater the percentage o individuals in poverty,the greater the percentage o individuals
receiving government cash trans ers. Incontrast, Daggett County has the ourthlowest poverty rate in the state, so itis believable that no one in the survey
reported receiving cash public assistance.
The American Community Survey is a veri-table treasure trove o in ormation. To learn more
about your county, the link below takes you to the AmericanFactFinder page o the U.S. Census Bureaus website, whichhas a link to the American Community Survey.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates for 2005-2009.
Percent of HouseholdsReceiving Cash Public
Assistance
San Juan
Grand
C a rb o n
Du c he s ne
Uintah
State of Utah
Emery
Daggett
0%
1.2%
1.8%1.8%
2.7%
3.1%
3.9%
4.8%
12.3%13.7%
15.8%16.4%
18.6%
22.5%22.9%
35.2%
Da g g e t t
Carbon
Eme ry
G ra nd
Duchesne
Uintah
San Juan
State of Utah
Percent of HouseholdsReceiving Retirement Income
21.5%22.4%
24.2%26.3%
27.3%
29.8%
33.1%
43.6%
Da g g e t t
Carbon
Eme ry
G ra nd
Duchesne
Uintah
San Juan
State of Utah
Percent of HouseholdsReceiving Social Security
http://fact nder.census.gov/
A look at incomesources portrays ademographic pictureof the seven counties
which compriseEastern Utah.
http://factfinder.census.gov/http://factfinder.census.gov/8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
26/2826 March/April 2011
county highlight | by ryan kanaley, research intern
In the northwest corner o the Beehive state residesa quiet county named a ter its most abundant tree:the box elder. Un ortunately Box Elder County isconsidered economically distressed. In the all o 2010,almost one in ten (9.4 percent) o the Box Elder work orce
was unemployed. This increase in unemployment ismostly attributable to the decrease o manu acturing jobs,Box Elders primary industry. I Box Elders economy is tomaintain and prosper, industrial diversity may be a key.Otherwise, Box Elders level o joblessness will likely growover the next ew years.
Urban pressure continues to spread northward rom themetropolitan Wasatch Front. This may cause the agricultureindustry, which occupies 40 percent o Box Elders land, tomorph into a more metropolitan county in the uture. Toaid the local economy, Box Elder County has opened theBox Elder Business Center with the assistance o ederal
unds, which was created to develop existing businessesand attract new ones to the area.
Box ElderCounty
Box Elder CountyEmployment
16,000
16,500
17,000
17,500
18,000
18,500
19,000
19,500
20,000
20,500
21,000
00 01 02 0399 04 0605 08 09 1007
Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services.
The steamengine replicat the GoldenSpike NationHistoric Sitin Box EldCounty.
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
27/28
Beaver 8.5 %Box Elder 9.7 %Cache 5.8 %Carbon 8.3 %Daggett 7.1 %
Davis 6.9 %Duchesne 7.5 %Emery 7.6 %Gar eld 9.7 %
Grand 10.7 %Iron 9.1 %Juab 10.8 %Kane 8.2 %Millard 6.5 %Morgan 7.1 %
Piute 7.2 %Rich 6.0 %Salt Lake 7.3 %San Juan 13.5 %Sanpete 9.5 %
Sevier 8.3 %Summit 7.5 %Tooele 8.2 %Uintah 6.6 %Utah 7.7 %
Wasatch 8.9 %Washington 10.2 %Wayne 9.3 %Weber 8.5 %
December 2010Seasonally AdjustedUnemployment Rates
December 2010Unemployment Rates
Changes From LastYear
Utah Unemployment Rate 7.5 % Up 0.9 points
U.S. Unemployment Rate 9.4 % Down 0.5 points
Utah Non arm Jobs (000s) 1,205.2 Up 1.3 %U.S. Non arm Jobs (000s) 131,062.0 Up 0.7 %
December 2010 ConsumerPrice Index RatesU.S. Consumer Price Index 219.2 Up 1.5%U.S. Producer Price Index 183.0 Up 4.0%
Source: Utah Department of Workforce Services
jobs.utah.gov/wi Trendlines 2
rate update | workforce information
Theme:Outlook or College Grads
County Highlight:
BeaverOccupation:
Veterinarian
Next Issue:Watch for these features in our
justthe facts...
8/7/2019 Utah Trend Lines March-April 2011
28/28
Presorted StandardUS Postage
PAIDSLC, UT
Permit # 4621
Utah Department of Workforce ServicesWorkforce Research and Analysis Division140 E. 300 S.Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Training opportunities for green jobs is here! Find out more at
http://jobs.utah.gov/services/grants/sesp.html
Did you know...
http://jobs utah go
W hat it means to be
gr een and how Utahs
economy is af f ected by
the gr een mov ement
C ar e e r s
G r e e nT R A IN IN G O PP O RT U N IT IES
f o r
A LSO