6
BRAFMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. BEN.JAMIN BRAFMAN ANDREA ZELLAN .JOSHUA D. KIRSHNER JACOB KAPLAN TENY R. GERAGOS ADMITTED IN NY AND CA Via ECF ATTORNEYS AT LAW 767 THIRD AVENUE. 26TH FLOOR NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10017 TELEPHONE: (2121 750-7800 FACSIMILE: (212) 750-3906 E-MAIL: [email protected] AprilS,2018 Office of the Clerk of the Court United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit United States Court House 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Dear SirlMadame: Re: United States v. Shkreli 18-819cr MARK M. BAKER OF COUNSEL MARC AGNIFILO OF COUNSEL ADMITTED IN NY AND N..J Pursuant to Local Rule 31 .2 (a)(1 )(D), this letter is sllbmjtted in furtherance of Defendant-Appellant Martin Shkreli's request for an extended date in which to file his Brief and Appendix, beyond the 91 day deadline provided in subd. (a)(I)(A). The reason for this request is that, far in excess of the almost six thousand (6,000) page trial transcript, thi rather hi gh profile criminal prosecution presents an unusually voluminous record encompassing numerous issues of law which constituted the proceedings ilL the district court. At tili .juncture, however, it is impossible for appellate counsel to foresee which issues will be selected for presentation to the court for review and which issues -- only following dutiful analysis ofthe record in its entirety -- will not be submitted for the Court's consideration. Barring any presently unforeseen items which may have escaped counsel's attention, the following is a list of the various transcripts, submissions, exhibits and materials, along with the corresponding amount of pages, which constitutes the record of the district court resulting from the 35 page Indictment: Case 18-819, Document 17, 04/05/2018, 2273058, Page1 of 6

Via ECF United States · A. Pre-trial Motion to Suppress: Defense's principal motion papers ... Defense's brief ... Defense's pre-sentence

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Via ECF United States · A. Pre-trial Motion to Suppress: Defense's principal motion papers ... Defense's brief ... Defense's pre-sentence

BRAFMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

BEN.JAMIN BRAFMAN

ANDREA ZELLAN

.JOSHUA D. KIRSHNER

JACOB KAPLAN

TENY R. GERAGOS ADMITTED IN NY AND CA

Via ECF

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

767 THIRD AVENUE. 26TH FLOOR

NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10017

TELEPHONE: (2121 750-7800

FACSIMILE: (212) 750-3906

E-MAIL: [email protected]

AprilS,2018

Office of the Clerk of the Court United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit United States Court House 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007

Dear SirlMadame:

Re: United States v. Shkreli 18-819cr

MARK M. BAKER OF COUNSEL

MARC AGNIFILO OF COUNSEL

ADMITTED IN NY AND N..J

Pursuant to Local Rule 31 .2(a)(1 )(D), this letter is sllbmjtted in furtherance of Defendant-Appellant Martin Shkreli' s request for an extended date in which to file his Brief and Appendix, beyond the 91 day deadline provided in subd. (a)(I)(A).

The reason for this request is that, far in excess of the almost six thousand (6,000) page trial transcript, thi rather high profile criminal prosecution presents an unusually voluminous record encompass ing numerous issues of law which constituted the proceedings ilL the district court. At tili . juncture, however, it is impossible for appellate counsel to foresee which issues will be selected for presentation to the court for review and which issues -- only following dutiful analysis ofthe record in its entirety -­will not be submitted for the Court's consideration.

Barring any presently unforeseen items which may have escaped counsel's attention, the following is a list of the various transcripts, submissions, exhibits and materials, along with the corresponding amount of pages, which constitutes the record of the district court resulting from the 35 page Indictment:

Case 18-819, Document 17, 04/05/2018, 2273058, Page1 of 6

Page 2: Via ECF United States · A. Pre-trial Motion to Suppress: Defense's principal motion papers ... Defense's brief ... Defense's pre-sentence

BRAFMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

A. Pre-trial Motion to Suppress:

Defense's principal motion papers ...................... . 25 pages with exhibits totaling 105 pages

Government's responding papers ......... .. ............. 44 pages with exhibits totaling 110 pages

Defense's reply papers .............. .. ... ............. 11 pages with exhibits totaling 16 pages

Transcript of suppression hearing ....................... 44 pages

Court's decision . .................................... 27 pages

B. Government's Motions in Limine:

Government's principal papers ........................ 38 pages with exhibits totaling 20 pages

Defense's responding papers .. ... . ....... ... ... .. ...... 25 pages

Government's reply papers ..... . ... . ................... 28 pages

Defense's supplemental responding papers .......... .. .... 15 pages

Government's sur-reply ................................ 4 pages

C. Defense's Motion in Limine

Defense's principal papers .............................. 7 pages with exhibits totaling 53 pages

Government's responding papers ........................ 32 pages

D. Press Pool Issue

Movants' principal papers ........... .. ................ 17 pages

-2-

Case 18-819, Document 17, 04/05/2018, 2273058, Page2 of 6

Page 3: Via ECF United States · A. Pre-trial Motion to Suppress: Defense's principal motion papers ... Defense's brief ... Defense's pre-sentence

BRAFMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Defense's response ................................... . 3 pages

Government's response ................................ 3 pages

Transcript of Hearing ..................... . ........... 88 pages

Court's decision and order ...... .. .... . .......... ... ... 17 pages

E. Trial Proceedin~s

Transcript of pretrial conference ....................... 103 pages

Transcript of Trial ......... .. ....................... 5665 pages

Total number of government exhibits ........................ 7661

Total number of defense exhibits ................. ... ......... 24

F. Briefing During Trial on Admissibility of Evidence

1. Admissibility of Settlement Agreements in the Absence of Available Witnesses

Government's brief .............................. 24 pages

Defense's brief .......................... . . . .... 22 pages

Government's reply brief ........ ... ........ .. .. .. 10 pages

Defense's reply brief .......... .. ..... .. .... . ...... 5 pages

1 Many of the government's exhibits exceed 100 pages in length.

-3-

Case 18-819, Document 17, 04/05/2018, 2273058, Page3 of 6

Page 4: Via ECF United States · A. Pre-trial Motion to Suppress: Defense's principal motion papers ... Defense's brief ... Defense's pre-sentence

BRAFMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 2. Admissibility of Defendant's Statements

Defense's brief ................................... 2 pages with exhibits totaling 10 pages

Government's response ................. .... . ... . 14 pages

G. Post-Verdict Rule 29( c) Motion Proceedings

Defense's brief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 27 pages

Government's Response . ........... . .. ... .. .. ... . ..... 20 pages

Defense's Reply ....................................... 6 pages

Decision of the dist. ct. on Rule 29 and loss amount. . ....... 96 pages

H. Forfeiture Proceedings

Government's principal papers ......................... 10 pages with exhibits totaling 10 pages

Defense's response .................................... 8 pages

Government's reply ................................... 12 pages with exhibits totaling 2 pages

Defense's sur-reply ......... ... ........ .. ........ ..... . 5 pages

Government's revised letter ............................. 2 pages with exhibits totaling 8 pages

Court's decision ...................................... 15 pages

I. Guidelines Loss Proceedings

Defense's principal letter ..... . ..... . ....... .... ....... 14 pages

Government's response .. ............ .. ... ... ... ....... 21 pages

-4-

Case 18-819, Document 17, 04/05/2018, 2273058, Page4 of 6

Page 5: Via ECF United States · A. Pre-trial Motion to Suppress: Defense's principal motion papers ... Defense's brief ... Defense's pre-sentence

BRAFMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Defense's Reply .. . ... . ... . . . ..... . . . ....... .. ....... . . 7 pages

J. Restitution Proceedings2

Defense's letter to the district court ... . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. ..... 3 pages

Government's initial response ........... . ... .. .......... 2 pages

Government's supplemental response ..... . .. . .... ... ..... 9 pages with 4 exhibits totaling 63 pages

Defense's Reply 3 pages

K. Sentencing Proceedings

Defense's pre-sentence memorandum ................... 93 pages with exhibits totaling 203 pages

Government's pre-sentence memorandum ... . ...... . . .... 70 pages

Probation Department's pre-sentence report ... . ... . ...... 37 pages with addendums totaling 29 pages

Transcript of pre-sentence status conference .. . .. ... . ... .. 24 pages

Transcript of Rule 29, forfeiture and loss argument ......... 49 pages

Transcript of sentencing . .. ...... . ... . ... .. ....... ... . 119 pages

Notably, it is Defendant-Appellant's intention to participate fully in the determination and drafting of the issues to be presented. Thus, given his incarceration, significant periods of time will be consumed in simply exchanging drafts, followed -- if time allows -- by face to face discussion between counsel and client in whatever Bureau of Prisons facility to which he will ultimately be assigned.

2 The district court has deferred its decision on this issue until April 9, 2018. See Docket Entry #2 at p. 6.

-5-

Case 18-819, Document 17, 04/05/2018, 2273058, Page5 of 6

Page 6: Via ECF United States · A. Pre-trial Motion to Suppress: Defense's principal motion papers ... Defense's brief ... Defense's pre-sentence

BRAFMAN & ASSOC1ATES, P.C.

In light of the sheer volume of the record on appeal-- and given other existing filing deadlines with which, as appellate counsel to this firm, I must comply -- it is respectfully requested that Appellant be allowed an additional sixty-two (62) days in which to file his brief and appendix. Specifically, it is requested that he be granted until on or before September 4, 2018 (i.e., the day after Labor Day) to perfect this appeal.

cc: Jacquelyn M. Kasulis, Esq. Alixandra E. Smith, Esq. Girish Karthik Srinivasan, Esq.

(Via ECF)

Respectfully submitted,

~~ , . MARK M. BAKER

-6-

Case 18-819, Document 17, 04/05/2018, 2273058, Page6 of 6