VIE: Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project · April 2015 . VIE: Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project . Prepared by Joint Venture: CDM Smith, Inc., WSP Finland

Social Monitoring Report Quarterly Report No. 6 April 2015

VIE: Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project Prepared by Joint Venture: CDM Smith, Inc., WSP Finland Limited & Yooshin Engineering Corporation for the Ministry of Transport, Cuu Long Corporation for Investment, Development and Project Management of Infrastructure and the Asian Development Bank.

NOTE

In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Some information has been removed as it falls within exceptions to disclosure specified in paragraph 97, of ADB’s Public Communications Policy (2011).

Joint Venture:

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT

Cuu Long Corporation for Investment, Development and

Project Management of Infrastructure (Cuulong CIPM)

Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project (CMDCP)

Detailed Design, Procurement and Implementation Support Services TA 7822-VIE

Contract No.: 720A/CIPM-HDKT

RESETTLEMENT & SOCIAL

QUARTERLY REPORT NO.6

Joint Venture:

CDM Smith, Inc., WSP Finland Limited & Yooshin Engineering Corporation

Group 5, Tan Tich Hamlet, Tinh Thoi commune, Cao Lanh City, Dong Thap province

Tel: (84) 067-3881-255 ; Fax: (84) 067-3881-256

April 2015

Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project (CMDCP)

Detailed Design, Procurement and Implementation Support Services TA 7822-VIE

Contract No.: 720A/CIPM-HDKT

RESETTLEMENT & SOCIAL

QUARTERLY REPORT NO.6

Name Position Signature

Prepared by

Pierre Arnoux/ Chu Duy Tuyen/ Nguyen Cong Hiep

Resettlement/Social Development Specialists

Reviewed by Pierre Arnoux Resettlement/Social Development Specialist

Approved by Gordon Belton Project Manager

Project Manager

Gordon Belton

April 2015

CMDCP Resettlement & Social –Quarterly Report No. 6

i

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank

AP - Affected Person

CIPM - Corporation for Investment, Development and Project

Management of Infrastructure

CLFD - Center for Land Fund Development (Can Tho City)

CHLFD - Center for Housing & Land Fund Development (Dong Thap

Province)

CMDCP - Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project

CY - Construction Yard

DDIS - Detailed Design and Implementation Support

DMS - Detailed Measurement Survey

DNA - Detailed Needs Assessment

DOLISA - Department of Labor, Invalids and Social Assistance

FU - Farmers’ Union

GOV - Government of Vietnam

HH - Households

IRP - Income Restoration Program

LUF - Land Use Fee

MOT - Ministry of Transport

MOU - Memorandum of Understanding

PAC - Provincial AIDS Center

ROW - Right-of-way

RP - Resettlement Plan

SAP - Social Action Plan

SES - Socio-economic survey

USD - United States Dollar

VND - Vietnamese dong

WU - Women’s Union

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

For this report, the rate of $1 USD: VND 21,515 has been used.

CMDCP Resettlement & Social – Quarterly Report No.6

ii

TABLE OF CONTENT

1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1

2. OBJECTIVES OF INTERNAL MONITORING REPORT (IMR)............................................................. 1

3. STATUS OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIVITIES .............................................. 1

3.1 Status of Resettlement Activities ................................................................................................. 1

3.2 Relocated Households ................................................................................................................. 3

3.3 Status of Payment of Compensation ........................................................................................... 4

3.4 Status of Land Hand Over ............................................................................................................ 5

3.4.1 Package CW1A ............................................................................................................... 5

3.4.2 Package CW1B ............................................................................................................... 6

3.4.3 Package CW1C ............................................................................................................... 7

3.4.4 Package CW2A ............................................................................................................... 7

3.4.5 Package CW2B ............................................................................................................... 7

3.4.6 Package CW2C ............................................................................................................... 8

3.4.7 Package CW3A ............................................................................................................... 8

3.4.8 Package CW3B: .............................................................................................................. 8

4. OUTSTANDING RESETTLEMENT ISSUES ....................................................................................... 9

4.1 Land Assets in the 4 Interchanges ............................................................................................... 9

4.2 Thoi Thuan RS .............................................................................................................................. 9

4.3 Access Road for Ward 6 RS ........................................................................................................ 10

4.5 Complaints from Households who are no Longer Affected Due to the Reduction of the Construction Yards .......................................................................................................................... 12

4.6 Guidelines for Self-Relocated HH ............................................................................................... 12

4.7 Self-Relocated HH who didn’t Receive Infrastructure Development Grant .............................. 14

4.8 Problems Met with Electric Lines .............................................................................................. 14

4.8.1 110 kV Electric Line ...................................................................................................... 14

4.8.2 210 kV Electric Line in An Binh Commune ................................................................... 15

5. GRIEVANCE PROCESS ................................................................................................................. 16

6. INCOME RESTORATION PROGRAM ........................................................................................... 17

6.1 Can Tho City ............................................................................................................................... 17

6.2 Dong Thap Province ................................................................................................................... 17

7. SOCIAL ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................................. 18

7.1 Capacity Building on Gender ...................................................................................................... 18

7.2 Employment Opportunities for the Local People ...................................................................... 18

8. HIV/AIDS AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING PREVENTION PROGRAM ............................................... 18

9. MONITORING INDICATORS ........................................................................................................ 19

9.1 Land Acquisition and Resettlement ........................................................................................... 19

9.2 Income Restoration Plan ............................................................................................................ 21

9.3 HIV/AIDS and Human Trafficking Prevention program ............................................................. 21


iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Status of Resettlement Activities......................................................................................... 2

Table 2: Households who Need to be Relocated .............................................................................. 3

Table 3: Households who Received a Plot in a RS ............................................................................. 4

Table 4: Summary of Compensation Payments ................................................................................ 4

Table 5: Construction Status for each Package ................................................................................. 5

Table 6: Situation of Land Handed over for Package CW1A ............................................................. 6

Table 7: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW1B .................................................................. 7

Table 8: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW1C .................................................................. 7

Table 9: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW2A .................................................................. 7

Table 10: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW2B ................................................................ 8

Table 11: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW2C ................................................................ 8

Table 12: HH Located in the Loop of the Interchange Entitled to the IRP ........................................ 9

Table 13: Characteristics of 10 HH under Local Project ................................................................. 11

Table 14: Summary of Grievances ................................................................................................... 16

Table 15: Indicators for Land Acquisition and Resettlement .......................................................... 19

Table 16: Indicators for Income Restoration Plan ........................................................................... 21

Table 17: Indicators for HIV/AIDS and Human Trafficking Program ............................................... 22

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Division of the Project into Packages ................................................................................. 5

Figure 2: Access Road to Ward 6 RS ................................................................................................ 10

Figure 3: HH Living in a Temporary House ...................................................................................... 12

Figure 4: Master Plan Posted at Commune/Ward Office................................................................ 14

Figure 5: 110 kV Tower to be Relocated in Tinh Thoi Commune .................................................... 15

Figure 6: 220 kV Towers Located close to RoW in An Binh Commune ........................................... 15

LIST OF ANNEX

Annex 1: List of HH Located in the Loop, Eligible to IRP but not Included in the IRP List ............... 23

Annex 2: Information on Households Met in February - March 2015 ............................................ 24

Annex 3 : List of Pending Grievances............................................................................................... 41

Annex 4 : List of HH who didn’t receive compensation and Reasons why they didn’t Receive Compensation .................................................................................................................................. 50

Annex 5: Obstacles on the ROW...................................................................................................... 54

Annex 6: Agreed Steps to Implement the IRP in Can Tho City ........................................................ 59

Annex 7: Disclosure of Lists pf HH Entitled to the IRP in Dong Thap Province ............................... 62

Annex 8: Planning of Resettlement and Social Activities from April to June 2015 ......................... 64


1

1. INTRODUCTION

1. The Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project (CMDCP) will improve connectivity in the Mekong Delta Region and provide efficient access from Ho Chi Minh City to the Southern Coastal Region through construction of two cable stayed bridges across the Mekong River and associated roads: Component 1 – Cao Lanh Bridge (2.4 km) and approach roads (5.4 km); Component 2 – Interconnecting Road (15.7 km); and Component 3 – Vam Cong Bridge (2.97 km) and approach roads (4.08 km).

2. Resettlement Plans (RP) have been approved, for Dong Thap Province & Can Tho, City by ADB on 5 April 2013. A RP Addendum for a new access road in Tinh Thoi commune (Dong Thap Province) was approved on 24 November 2014. ADB also approved detailed IRP for Dong Thap Province and Can Tho City on 17 March 2015.

3. A Social Action Plan (SAP) has also been prepared and approved by ADB on 7 May 2013 and MoT on 4 July 2013. Finally the HIV/AIDS and Human Trafficking Prevention Program has been approved by ADB in June 2013 and by MOT on 26th August 2013.

3. CIPM is the representative of the executive agency (MOT) and is responsible for internal monitoring. As per agreed RPs, CIPM has to submit quarterly monitoring report to ADB and MOT. This report constitutes the resettlement & social monitoring report No.6 (QR#6).

2. OBJECTIVES OF INTERNAL MONITORING REPORT (IMR)

4. The objectives of the monitoring program are (i) to ensure that the standard of living of AHs are restored or improved; (ii) to monitor whether the overall project and resettlement objectives are being met; (iii) to assess if rehabilitation measures and compensation are sufficient; (iv) to identify problems and risks; and (v) to identify measures to mitigate problems.

5. The range of activities and issues that need to be recorded and verified, include:

Compensation, allowance payments and delivery of assistance measures to AHs;

Re-establishment of AH settlements and business enterprises;

Reaction of AHs, in particular, to resettlement and compensation packages; and

Re-establishment of income levels and living of AHHs

6. QR #6 covers the period from mid-December 2014 to end of March 2015. During this period, the External Monitor conducted a mission (5 to 16 January 2015) and provided CIPM with recommendations. Answers to the EM comments have been sent to ADB/DFAT in February 2015. ADB/DFAT also provided comments on the QR#5 in January 2015. Answers to these comments have been sent in February 2015.

3. STATUS OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIVITIES

3.1 Status of Resettlement Activities

7. A total of 1,773 HH (1,515 HH in Dong Thap Province and 258 in Can Tho City) are affected by the project. Compensation is now completed at 98.2% for the whole project (98.2 % in Dong Thap Province and 98.0% in Can Tho City). 31 HH are not yet compensated due mainly to pending grievances. Annex 4 presents the reasons why these HH have not been compensated. 90 HH (5%) didn’t yet handover their land; most of them are building new house and will handover when their


2

house will be built.

8. Civil works started for all packages now except package CW3B. Table 1 presents the status of resettlement activities.

Table 1: Status of Resettlement Activities

Pkg

Commune/ ward

Affected Area (ha)

Affected HH

AHs who received

compensation

AH who hand-over

land

AHs who didn't receive compensation

HH Reasons

Component 1 61.3 689 667 656 22

CW1A

An Binh 5.6 93 84 76 9 - 9 HH refused compensation;

Ward 3 4.8 47 42 40 5 - 1 case of land dispute; - 4 HH refused compensation;

Tinh Thoi 29.4 370 369 367 1 - 1 HH lack of LURC (Pham Ngoc

Qui) CW1B

Tan My 1 21.5 179 172 173 7

- 1 case of land dispute; - 5 HH refused compensation - 1 HH (Huynh Minh Tan) was

compensated land for land; adjustment between former & new land price under review;

CW1C

Component 2 100.1 619 615 567 4

Tan My 2 4.5 28 28 28 0

CW2A

My An Hung B 29.0 175 174 173 1 - 1 HH is waiting to receive

additional compensation payment

Binh Thanh Trung

24.7 142 142 133 0

CW2B

Binh Thanh 30.9 173 170 133 3 - 3 HH refused compensation

CW2C Dinh An C2 11.0 101 101 100 0

Component 3 28.6 207 207 207 0

CW3B Dinh An C3 28.6 207 207 207 0

CW3A

Total Dong Thap 190 1515 1489 1430 28

CW3A Thoi Thuan 18.8 190 188 188 2

- 1 HH refused compensation (compensation for land)

- 1 HH couldn’t be contacted

CW3B Vinh Trinh 9.7 68 65 65 3

- 1 HH couldn’t be contacted; - 1 HH is preparing inheritance

procedures; - Compensation plan not

approved for 1 HH;

Total Can Tho 28.5 2581 253 253 5

TOTAL PROJECT 218.5 1773 1742 1683 31

Source: CHLFD/CLFD March 2015;

1 In Can Tho the number of AH is now 258 (before 257); I HH split in two (2 LURC now).


3

3.2 Relocated Households

9. A total of 565 HH will need to relocate as their house is totally affected and their remaining residential land is not viable. 349 HH opted for self-relocation and 213 to relocate in a serviced resettlement site. 3 HH didn’t yet decide.

Table 2: Households who Need to be Relocated

Package Commune/ward Affected

HH

Household who Need to Relocate

HH opted for Self-Relocation

HH opted to relocate in RS

Not yet decided

Total

Component 1 689 116 113 3 232

CW1A

An Binh 93 7 35 0 42

Ward 3 47 0 16 3 19

Tịnh Thoi 370 93 33 0 126

CW1B

Tan My 1 179 16 29 0 45 CW1C

Component 2 619 123 51 0 174

CW2A

Tan My 2 28 2 3 0 5

My An Hung B 175 1 31 0 32

Binh Thanh Trung 142 23 6 0 29

CW2B

Binh Thanh 173 72 1 0 73

CW2C Dinh An C2 101 25 10 0 35

Component 3 207 57 6 0 63

CW3B Dinh An C3 207 57 6 0 63

CW3A

Total Dong Thap 1515 296 170 3 469

CW3A Thoi Thuan 190 33 36 0 69

CW3B Vinh Trinh 68 20 7 0 27

Total Can Tho City 258 53 43 0 96

TOTAL PROJECT 1773 349 213 3 565

Source: CHLFD/CLFD March 2015

10. At the time of the preparation of the report, only 23 HH relocated in a RS and built a house among a total of 207 HH who received a plot of land in a RS (see Table 3). 184 HH didn’t relocate yet even if they received compensation and handed over their land. Reasons for not building a house on the plot allocated are the following: i) some HH kept the plots as an investment and are planning to sell the plot; ii) some AH want to keep the plot for their children; iii) some HH find plots in resettlement site too small for their family.

11. Annex 2 presents cases of HH who received a plot but didn’t move to a RS (see cases #3 & 4 in An Binh & Tan My communes).


4

Table 3: Households who Received a Plot in a RS

Relocation Site Number of HH who

received a plot in a RS

Number of HH

who built a house

Dong Thap Province 164 18

My Tho 35 8

Ward 3 25 4

Ward 6 21 0

Tan My 62 1

Dinh An 14 5

Dong Thap General Hospital 7 0

Can Tho City 43 9

Long Thanh 2 21 HH/29 plots 5

Thoi Thuan 22 HH/26 plots 4

Total 207 27

3.3 Status of Payment of Compensation

12. Compensation is almost completed for all components (98%). The total compensation costs for Dong Thap province is VND 884.5 billion (41.2 M USD). Compensation was made under the Government and Province budget (part of component 1 and component 3) and under ADB OCR loan (part of component 1 and component 2). Up to now disbursement reached 840.1 billion VND (39.2 M USD).

13. In Can Tho City, compensation was done under the Government and City budget. The total resettlement compensation cost is VND 212.1billion (9.9 M USD). Up to now the Government has funded VND 178.4 billion (8.3 M USD).

Table 4: Summary of Compensation Payments

Component Total Nb of

HH

HH who received

compensation

Total compensation

Total disbursed Remaining budget

Billion VND Billion VND % Billion VND %

Component 1 689 667 351.1 319.6 91% 31.5 9%

Component 2 619 615 383.7 371 97% 12.7 3%

Component 3 207 207 149.7 149.5 100% 0.2 0%

Total Dong Thap 1515 1489 884.5 840.1 95% 44.4 5%

Component 3 258 253 212.1 178.4 84% 33.8 16%

Total Can Tho 258 253 212.1 178.4 84% 33.8 16%

TOTAL PROJECT 1773 1742 1096.6 1018.5 93% 78.2 7%

Source: CHLFD/CLFD March 2015


5

3.4 Status of Land Hand Over

14. Among the 8 packages, all have been awarded and 7 received Notice to Proceed (NTP) and are under construction; only package CW3B didn’t receive NTP.

Table 5: Construction Status for each Package

Package Award and signing NTP

CW1A 29-Aug-14 29-Oct-14

CW1B 15-Oct-13 25-Mar-14

CW1C 5-Nov-14 29 Dec 2014

CW2A 15-Dec-14 31 Dec 2014

CW2B 15-Dec-14 31 Dec 2014

CW2C 15-Dec-14 29 Dec 2014

CW3A 15 Sep-13 26-Nov-2013

CW3B 15 Mar-15 Second quarter 2015

Figure 1: Division of the Project into Packages

3.4.1 Package CW1A

15. Package CW1A is the package which experiences the more serious delays regarding compensation and handover of land.

16. There are 17 Households (4,684 m2) in An Binh commune, 7 HH (4,017 m2) in Ward 3 and 3 HH (6,563 m2) in Tinh Thoi commune, who didn’t handed over their land to contractor due to grievances or land dispute. Most of the HH who lodged grievances are located along NH 30 in An Binh commune.

17. This situation leads to difficulties for the contractor to implement civil works in some sections of the package (construction of the Linh Son and Tinh Thoi bridges, temporary bridge for the Dinh Chung Bridge).

18. The resettlement task force is struggling to solve some cases, especially the case of Mr.


6

Nguyễn Văn Hủ (Linh Son bridge) and the case of the Huong Thao Petrol Station along NH 30.

19. For Linh Son Bridge, the case of Nguyễn Văn Hủ who refuse to hand over his land is now reviewed by the Supreme People’s Procuracy of Vietnam (see Annex 3 p45, Ward 3). His land was sold by public auction due to non-reimbursement of a loan at the bank and the new owner received compensation. Mr. Nguyễn Văn Hủ claims that his land shouldn’t have been sold and he should have received compensation.

20. The case of the Huong Thao petrol station also lasts for more than one year and hampers works for the contractor. 5 HH (5 brothers and their family) are living in the petrol station which is still in operation. An agreement was reached in December 2014 and compensation plan was submitted to Dong Thap PC on 15/12/2014. However the owners have now new requests: i) Same compensation rate for all land (not divided into categories or raise of 10% of compensation for land if CHFLD is keeping 2 categories. According to them because the petrol station is a special business, compensation should take this into account. On 20 March 2015, PC of Cao Lanh District met them to reach an agreement. The report on this meeting is under preparation.

Table 6: Situation of Land Handed over for Package CW1A

Commune Total HHs

Total affected area (m2)

Area handed over

Area not yet handed over (m2)

% of land handed over

Nb HH who didn’t handover land

An Binh 93 44 462 39 778 4 684 89% 17

Ward 3 47 38 998 34 982 4 017 90% 7

Tinh Thoi 271 173 771 167 208 6 563 96% 3

Total 411 257 232 241 968 15 264 94% 27

21. New compensation rates have been issued for Le Minh Chi wood factory and the Huong Thao petrol station (raise from 4.950 to 5.860 M VND/m2). These new rates for residential land will also apply for the other HHs along NH30 who have residential land affected. CHLFD submitted additional compensation plans for 25 AHs based on these new rates in March 2015. Appraisal Committee reviewed the additional compensation plans on 19 March 2015 and is preparing a report to CHFLD for the revision of the compensation plans. The 9 AHs who complained are included in the 25 AHs and already agreed with the new compensation rates for residential land.

22. Even if most of the cases are now solved or being solved soon (except Mr. Nguyễn Văn Hủ and the Huong Thao petrol station), it will take time before HH will hand over their land (i.e. delay for approval by PPC, compensation to AHs and relocation of AHs). Approval of additional compensation plans is expected by the end of April.

23. Regarding the area under a local road project (bypass of Cao Lanh City, see QR #5) which is partially used by the ramp to the interchange, Dong Thap PPC and CIPM agreed to consider these HHs as AHs under the CMDCP and will request use of ADB loan to compensate them (see section 4.4).

3.4.2 Package CW1B

24. For the Cao Lanh Bridge (package CW1B), all land has been now handed over to the contractor for both the northern and southern sections (Tinh Thoi commune).

25. The 3 HH along Provincial Road 848, in Tan My commune were compensated in February 2015 and finally handed hand over their land to contractor in early March 2015 after 2 years of negotiations. This situation affected the construction area at P24 & P25. Construction started now for


7

these 2 piers.

26. Eight different compensation plans were prepared by CHLFD and submitted to Dong Thap PPC for approval during the negotiation and numerous meetings were necessary with the 3 HH over a 2 years period to reach an agreement.

Table 7: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW1B

Commune Total HHs


Area handed over




Tinh Thoi 99 55 615 55 615 0 100% 0

Tan My 66 48 135 48 135 0 100% 0

Total 165 103 750 103 750 0 100% 0

3.4.3 Package CW1C

27. Construction started in January on this section. 6 AHs still didn’t handover their land due grievances (at the interchange with PR 849). 5 of them want the project to acquire all their land. Change in the design is considered as it is small land acquisition for 5 of the HH. There was no progress since the last QR for this package.

Table 8: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW1C

Commune Total HHs Total affected

area (m2) Area

handed over Area not yet

handed over (m2) % of land

handed over Nb HH who didn’t

handover land

Tan My 113 125,814.1 125,263.7 550.4 99.6% 6

3.4.4 Package CW2A

28. Construction also started in January 2015 for this package. Handover is completed at 100% (see Table 9). 2 HH didn’t handover their house (built on other owner’s land); they will handover once their new house will be built (expected end of April 2015).

Table 9: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW2A

Commune

Total HHs


Area handed over




Tân Mỹ 28 45378.3 45378.3 0 100.0% 0

Mỹ An Hưng B 164 288738.3 288738.3 0 100.0% 22

Total 192 334116.6 334116.6 0 100.0% 2

3.4.5 Package CW2B

29. Construction also started in January 2015 for this package. 1 HH still didn’t handover their land and 8 HH didn’t handover their house (built on other owner’s land); they will handover once their new house will be built (expected end of April 2015).

2 The 2 HHs have not handed-over houses


8

Table 10: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW2B

Commune

Total HHs


Area handed over



HH who didn’t handover land

Mỹ An Hưng B 11 21105.4 21105.4 0 100.0% 0

Bình Thạnh Trung 128 257645.2 257210.56 434,64 99.8% 93

Total 139 278750.6 278315.96 434,64 99.8% 9

3.4.6 Package CW2C

30. Construction started in January 2015 for this package. 42 HH still didn’t handover their land as presented in Table 11.

31. Delay in handover occurred along NH80 (Binh Thanh commune) where 38 HH didn’t handover their land. They are waiting to build new house before handing over their land. Handed over is expected by the end of April. 2 HH in Dinh An commune will also handover their lance once their house built.

32. 2 HH complained about the compensation rates for residential land along NH80. They request compensation rates between 2.5 and 3 M; current rate is 1.8 M VND/m2. SIAC, the independent valuer, made a new survey and confirmed the rate of 1.8 M VND/m2. CHLFD explained the results of the survey to the 2 HH. The 2 HH however maintained their complaint.

Table 11: Situation of Land Handover for Package CW2C

Commune

Total HHs


Area handed over



HH who didn’t handover land

Bình Thạnh Trung 14 23528.1 23528.1 0 100.0% 0

Bình Thành 172 216712 203350.4 13361,6 93.8% 40

Định An 101 117678.4 117507.8 170,6 99.9% 2

CW 2C 287 357918.5 344386.3 13532,2 96.2% 42

3.4.7 Package CW3A

33. In section of package 3A in Dong Thap province, all 207 HH have handed over their land. For section of package 3A in Dong Thap Can Tho City 100 % of land (including Gentraco affected area) has been handed over to the contractor and civil works are ongoing). 109/110 AHs received compensation; among the 109 AHs, 57 own graves only.

3.4.8 Package CW3B:

34. 144/148 HH have been compensated and 108/148 HH (73.5%) handed over their land. 39 HH have not yet handed over their land (15 HH along the 1.5 km section). Contract has been awarded for this package but NTP has not yet been issued.

3 1 HH didn’t hand-over land and 9 HHs didn’t hand-over houses built on othe rowner’s land;


9

3.5 Obstacles on the Right-of-Way

35. Several infrastructures (electric lines, telecommunication lines, water supply pipes etc.) are not yet relocated for all components. Annex 4 presents the obstacles on the Right-of-Way (ROW). These obstacles hampered the progress of civil works in most of the packages.

4. OUTSTANDING RESETTLEMENT ISSUES

36. This section presents the outstanding issues regarding resettlement.

4.1 Land Assets in the 4 Interchanges

37. At the 6th PCC meeting on 11 November 2015, CIPM explained that the 4 interchange and intersection loops should not be acquired at the moment as it is at initial stage of the project implementation and the fund for compensating this land has not yet been clarified. During the April review mission it was agreed that DDIS will update the costs estimates for land acquisition and will develop alternatives, if feasible, to acquire the entire area of the land within the loops. The information will be available for the next PCC meeting planned in August 2015.

38. HH who have land in the interchanges start to be affected by the construction progress. 2 HH pointed the lack of water (cases # 14 & 15) due to the closure of irrigation channels. Some HH have also problems of access. Decision to acquire the loop is expected by all HH as well as local authorities.

39. DMS was already conducted in 2013 for HH located in the loops of the interchanges. Among the HH who are eligible to the IRP (losing more than 10% of productive, vulnerable HH, business affected) most of them (85%) are already eligible to the IRP and choose an income restoration activity. Most of the HH affected by loss of agriculture/garden land in the loops are also affected by the RoW or the ramps of the interchanges. 21 HH located in the loop are not yet included in the IRP list but will be eligible once the clearance of the loop will be decided (see Table 12).

40. Annex 1 presents the list of these 21 HH. As the IRP will start soon, it is recommended that these HH will be included in the list of eligible IRP. However, official approval from CIPM and ADB is required. These HH could be included in Phase 2 or 3 of the IRP implementation in Dong Thap Province.

Table 12: HH Located in the Loop of the Interchange Entitled to the IRP

Interchange HH already involved in IRP HH eligible if land is acquired not involved in IRP)4

NH 30 (An Binh Commune) 18 5

PR 849 (Tan My commune) 32 6

NH 80 (Binh Thanh commune) 39 5

NH 540 (Dinh An commune) 28 5 Total 117 21

4.2 Thoi Thuan RS

41. Can Tho City PC and the owner of the Thoi Thuan RS (Industrial Zone Management Board)

4 Number of HH may change following update of DMS


10

finally reached an agreement in December 2014 regarding costs and transfer of funds.

42. Funds were transferred on 30 January 2015 to the owner of Thoi Thuan RS. The owner of the RS completed infrastructures and allocated for relocated HH. HH can start to build house anytime now. However by the end of March 2015, no HH started to build house.

4.3 Access Road for Ward 6 RS

43. The main access road to Ward 6 RS is under construction; however, a house belonging to the army has to be moved. According to CHLFD, no fund is available in 2015 to remove the house. Construction is now stopped for the main access road.

44. A new access road is now completed from a local road (see photos below). The road to reach the RS, from this access road, is under construction and will be completed by the end of May 2015. Once completed, the 19 HH, who were allocated a plot in the RS, could start to build house.

Figure 2: Access Road to Ward 6 RS

Current access completed Access to the RS under construction

4.4 HH Affected by Local Project

45. In An Binh commune, the DOT of Dong Thap province planned to build a 15 km bypass of Cao


11

Lanh City. The start of this bypass is located at the location of the interchange with NH30. Compensation started in 2010; land was cleared however the project stopped due to lack of funds.

46. 4 HH were identified in the QR #5; however on some land, several houses are built and are considered as AH (i.e. family of Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ba who owns the land include 5 houses belonging to different family members). Finally 10 AH are now identified.

47. Most of the HH under the local project were compensated in 2010 and handed over their land. However the 10 AHs refused compensation due to low compensation rate for residential land (PPC rate proposed is 1.2 M VND/m2; compensation for AH under the CMDCP was 4.95 and now 5.8 M VND/m2).

48. These AH were not considered as AH under the CMDCP because compensation plans were prepared under a local project, before the approval of the CMDCP. There is a lack of fund currently to compensate these AHs from local budget. Dong Thap PPC and CIPM agreed to use ADB loan for compensation. However official confirmation is needed from CIPM/ADB regarding the use of ADB loan for these 10 AHs. Once confirmed, these 10 AHs will be considered as AHs under the CMDCP.

49. In March 2015, CHFLD submitted compensation plans for these 10 HH. In these compensation plans, the same rates as AHs under the CMDCP applied. The Appraisal Committee reviewed the additional compensation plans on 19 March 2015 and is preparing a report to CHFLD for the revision of the compensation plans. If CIPM/ADB confirmed the use of the ADB loan to compensate these HH, the compensation plans will have to be modified (new compensation plan to be under the CMDCP).

50. These HH will also be entitled to the IRP if they are eligible (i.e. landless HH). Table 10 presents the characteristics of these 10 HH. Annex 2 presents 2 cases in this situation.

Table 13: Characteristics of 10 HH under Local Project

Affected land (m2) Affected house Relocation in RS

Vulnerable Source of income Resid. Garden Total Cat. Area

Nguyễn Thị Ba 198 87,4 285,4 temp 72,54 Yes Hired labor:

10M/Month

Đặng Thị Ngọc Bích 0 0 0 temp 31,74 Yes Landless Hired labor:

9M/Month

Nguyễn Văn Dững 181 5,7 186,7 temp 66,69 Yes

Đặng Kim Hưng 60 50,8 110,8 temp 41,86 Yes Landless Hired labor:

3M/Month Bùi Thanh Liêm 47,3 47,3

Đặng Kim Loan 80 6,7 86,7 Landless Hired labor

3,5 M/ Month

Đoàn Văn Lô 81,6 81,6 temp 55,47 Yes

Nguyễn Thanh Quí 198,2 198,2 c4 87,36 Yes

Đặng Văn Tới 60 42,5 102,5 temp 37,8 Landless Hired labor

3 M/ month Bùi Nguyên Hiếu Trung 40,3 40,3 temp 72,54 Yes

Total 946,4 193,1 1139,5

51. Regarding the HH with young children who built a temporary house (see QR #5) behind their family land, the HH is not included in the list because they built the house after the cut-off date and on land which has already been handed over. They were living before in the house of the husband’s


12

father (Mr. Dang Van Toi) who will receive compensation. Both the father and the family living in temporary house plan to move to My Tho RS if compensation is sufficient. The HH will also be entitled to the IRP.

52. We should note that the 10 HH were not be informed about the submission of the compensation plans. According to CHFLD, it is because the DMS was already signed and the new compensation plans only update the compensation rates for land. Information is needed for these HH.

Figure 3: HH Living in a Temporary House

Family with young children living in a temporary house

Temporary house surrounded by construction works

4.5 Complaints from Households who are no Longer Affected Due to the Reduction of the Construction Yards

53. During the November 2014 ADB/DFAT review mission, CHLFD requested the Mission to allow use of loan funds for providing assistance to the 47 HH who affected under the initial project design. It was answered that the Mission has no objection to use loan funds. However ADB/DFAT requested a review of the methodology and verification used for the assistance to be provided to the households.

54. At the request of CIPM a draft report on this issue was prepared by DDIS and submitted to CIPM on 18 December 2014. However a new assessment will be conducted by a team of experts will be establish to review the proposed assistance and determine the support for loss of income.

55. At the time of the preparation of this report, the new assessment was not completed. Once completed, DDIS will update the report with new costs verified by local Authorities. DDIS will also review the methodology used for the assistance once the new assessment will be completed.

4.6 Guidelines for Self-Relocated HH

56. ADB/DFAT requested the preparation of guidelines for self-relocating households who may run the risk of building houses on non-residential land and could not be compensated for structures


13

in case they have to move again.

57. Since April 2014, CIPM/DDIS discussed this with CFLD/CHLFD, local authorities and self-relocating households. Many self-relocated HH were also met. Annex 2 present such cases (#5 to 9).

58. During RP preparation, few HH wanted to self-relocate and most of them planned to build a house in a RS. HH changed their mind for the following reasons:

HH find land use fee in RS too high and want to buy cheaper plot to have more money to build the house;

HH want to relocate close to their former location (RS are judged generally too far);

HH have other land or land belonging to relatives to build a house;

Ca Na RS (44 HH) was cancelled in Binh Thanh commune;

59. Most of the 349 self-relocating HH have now moved. Authorization to build a new house is the responsibility of the commune/wad people’s committee. Three communes were met (My An Hung B, Binh Thanh and Tinh Thoi) to assess this process. Discussions were also held with cadastral department staff in charge of authorization to build house.

60. All communes have a master plan indicating the purpose of land use for all plots in the commune/ward. These plans are generally posted at commune/ward office (see Figure 4). This plan is updated every year and all HHs are informed through their village leaders.

61. According to local authorities, almost all HH who want to build a house go to commune/ward authorities to get information. HH have to fill an application form to build a house indicating the location, type of house dimensions of plots etc. This application form is reviewed by local authorities (cadastral department) which decide if the HH can build the house or not. In Tinh Thoi, the cadastral department staff indicated that 95% of HH who want to build a house contacted them.

62. This was confirmed during meetings with AHs (see Annex 2 cases # 5 to 9) and other cases raised in previous QR. Most of the HH contacted local authorities to build their house. In some cases they didn’t, because they bought a plot they knew it was residential land and in compliance with master plan.

63. Commune/ward authorities indicated that affected by the CMDCP are more informed than other HH due to their numerous meetings at commune/ward and discussion on relocation. CLFD/CHFLD, at the time of compensation, also informed AHs who plan to self-relocate to contact local authorities for building a new house.

64. Management of building permit and commune/ward development improved significantly in Vietnam the last 10 years and the management is quite strict now. If a HH built a house on a non-appropriate plot (not in compliance with planning or plots doesn’t meet standards) he is generally stopped (refer case raised in Can Tho by the EM in his third report).

65. Cases of HH who self-relocate on agriculture/garden land exist but are limited5. HH have to build house along existing roads with existing services (electricity, water etc.). Change of land use purpose is also possible. In My An Hung B, local authorities said they have a special policy for the project if HH want to build on non-residential land along an existing road, it is possible if the HH committed that he will ask for the change of land-use purpose.

5 The most serious cases are the HH who moved back in the loop of the interchanges (8 cases) and experience problems of

access; however if the loop of the interchanges are cleared, these HH will be relocated.


14

66. Based on the meetings with local authorities and self-relocating HH during the last year, we consider that the preparation of guidelines is not necessary. What is important is to inform HH, who plan to self-relocate, to contact local authorities for information. This was done during public meeting and during individual meetings. CFLD/CHFLD also told self-relocating HH to contact local authorities at the time of compensation. Local authorities are in charge of building permit management and give all necessary information. Regulations and procedures already exist and are provided by local authorities.

Figure 4: Master Plan Posted at Commune/Ward Office

Master Plan posted in Tinh Thoi commune Discussion in master plan in My An Hung B

4.7 Self-Relocated HH who didn’t Receive Infrastructure Development Grant

67. In Dong Thap Province, in component 2 (Binh Thanh Trung and Binh Thanh communes) some self-relocated HH met indicated that they didn’t receive the infrastructure development grant (i.e. 45 M VND) and refused to hand over their land.

68. According to CHLFD, most of these HH first indicated that they will relocate in a RS and then change for self-relocation. CHFLD is preparing additional compensation plans which have been submitted to Dong Thap PC for approval.

69. To speed-up the process of handover, CHLFD made advance payment to some HH before the final approval from PPC. DDIS will continue to follow-up the payment of this allowance.

4.8 Problems Met with Electric Lines

4.8.1 110 kV Electric Line

70. Part of a 110 kV transmission line is located in the RoW and affects contractors work. 10 towers will need to be removed (2 towers in Ward 3, 2 in Tinh Thoi and 6 in Binh Thanh).

71. Bidding documents were prepared by CHFLD and were submitted to the Department of Planning and Investment (DPI) on 2 March 2015. Documents are now under review by DPI.

72. CHFLD will meet HH living around the existing towers in early April 2015. The purpose is to discuss with HH and to get agreement with AHs on the proposed location of the towers. Land


15

acquisition will be necessary for the foundations of these towers and under the lines some land use restriction can apply. The project policy will apply for these HH in case of land acquisition.

Figure 5: 110 kV Tower to be Relocated in Tinh Thoi Commune

110 kV Tower to be relocated (in the background)

4.8.2 210 kV Electric Line in An Binh Commune

73. Two towers of a 220 kV line are located just outside the RoW. However the safety area around these towers, encroach on the RoW. No civil work is possible within this safety area. Two options are possible: i) temporary interruption of power in the electric line (period of 2 days); or ii) removal of these towers. Removal of these towers will lead to additional land acquisition. The Southern Power Management Board has been contacted to analyze both options.

Figure 6: 220 kV Towers Located close to RoW in An Binh Commune

The 2 towers of the 220 kV Electric Line in An Binh Commune


16

5. GRIEVANCE PROCESS

74. Dong Thap Province established a task force to manage the Project grievance redress process. 170 grievances remain in the Province. Around 25 grievances were solved during the last 3 months.

75. Most of the unresolved grievances involved pending adjustments that have been agreed in principle, with the expectation that they will be resolved soon (See Annex 3 for details on each case).

76. Solving grievances is a time consuming process and some grievance are still not resolved after more than one year. Solving the cases of the 3 AHs in Tan My commune took nearly 2 years and mobilized a lot of resources; 8 different compensation plans were prepared and numerous meetings were held. We should note that even if HH made grievances most of them were compensated and handed over their land; only 28 HH were not compensated and 90 HH didn’t yet handover land.

77. Table 14 presents a summary of the status and reasons of grievances. The main reasons for grievances are the rates for land, mainly residential land, (23 cases) and structures (16 cases). Many HH (83) request compensation for irrigation ditches and local roads as they claim ownership of these infrastructures. This type of claim is however minor and didn’t hamper construction (HH handed over their land even if the grievance is not yet solved).

78. This is the case of the wood factory of Mr. Le Minh Chi along NH 30. Part of his requests were solved and he received compensation, dismantled his wood factory and handed over his land. However he maintained some complaints (new grievance sent on 30 January 2015).

Table 14: Summary of Grievances

6 HH may have several grievances

No Commune/

Ward

Types of grievances

Total H

H w

ith G

rievances

Increase Lan

d rate

Locatio

n o

f Plo

t in R

S

Increase rates fo

r ho

use/stru

cture

Allo

cation

of re

set. plo

t

Sup

po

rt for sm

all bu

siness

Co

mp

ens. lan

d o

ut o

f RO

W

Increase co

mp

. for grave

Increase rate

for trees

Co

mp

ens. irrig. d

itch/ro

ad

Co

mp

ensatio

n fo

r po

nd

s

Ad

just lan

d lo

cation

Co

mp

ensate fo

r 3m

alon

g NH

80

Oth

er allow

ances

Co

mp

ens. b

ased o

n LU

RC

Ad

just m

easurem

ent

Land

disp

ute

Arran

ge mo

re plo

ts in R

S

Sup

po

rt for in

vest. on

land

A COMPONENT 1

I An Binh 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5

II Ward 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 8

III Tinh Thoi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3

IV Tan My 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 24

B COMPONENT 2

I Tan My 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

II My An Hung B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58

III Binh Thanh Trung 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 21

IV Binh Thanh 17 1 16 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 9 3 0 0 4 0 27

V Dinh An 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

C COMPONENT 3

I Dinh An 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

II Thoi Thuan (CT) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

TOTAL 23 4 16 1 2 11 1 2 83 6 6 1 11 3 0 5 6 14 1526


17

6. INCOME RESTORATION PROGRAM

6.1 Can Tho City

79. ADB approved IRP for Can Tho City on 17 March 2015. 137 participants have been recorded (52 agriculture activities; 48 vocational training; 37 small business).

80. Meeting to start implementation was held on 26 March with SC & WG. Steps to implement the IRP were discussed and agreed; these steps are presented in Annex 6.

81. The first step, confirmation of choice of activity by beneficiaries, started at the beginning of April. List of the AHs with their preliminary choices were posted at commune/ward office. HH were informed by various ways (radio announcement; notice to households by the village head etc.). AHs will have 3 weeks to give feedback on their final choice.

82. During the meeting, an issue was raised by the SC: they want to open an account at a commercial bank (Viettin) and not at the State Treasury as agreed. The reason they gave is because procedures for this account are too heavy (some regulations may delay disbursement i.e. obtain 3 biddings to buy animals).

83. According to ADB Controller's Department, the Minister of Finance have to approve the opening of an account at a commercial bank. Minutes of meetings were prepared. Steering Committee of Can Tho also sent an official letter to CIPM regarding their request to open an account at a commercial bank.

6.2 Dong Thap Province

84. ADB approved IRP for Dong Thap Province on 17 March 2015. 1,175 participants have been recorded. 824 AHs chose agriculture activities, 59 vocational training; 271 small business7. Contract was signed between CIPM and CLFD of Can Tho City on 2nd April 2015.

85. Meeting to start implementation was held on 3rd April with SC & WG. Steps to implement the IRP were discussed and agreed.

86. The first step, confirmation of choice of activity by beneficiaries, started on 6 of April. List of the AHs with their preliminary choices were posted at commune/ward office. HH were informed by various ways (radio announcement; notice to households by the village head etc.). For small business, all HH were met directly for additional explanation. AHs have to fill a form and give feedback on their final choice. Annex 7 presents photos of the disclosure of list of AHs in different communes in Dong Thap Province and of meeting with participants who choose small business.

87. The division of the IRP in 3 phases due to the large number of HH was discussed. The 3 phases were established based on the time of compensation (HH compensated the first will be in Phase 1; i.e. Dinh An and Tan My communes). However, the Representative of Agriculture Extension Center didn’t agree this division; she would prefer phases based on geographic area (i.e. adjacent communes to start together). Types of activities also depends of the season (i.e. flower plantation could be conducted only during specific time.

7 Some AHs chose more than one activity


18

88. It was agreed that Agriculture Extension Center, for agriculture activities, DOLISA for training and Women’s Union for small business will prepare an implementation plan by 26 April by commune. This plan will include a detailed schedule for each activity identified in the IRP and review of the phases. This plan will be reviewed by CIPM/DDIS.

89. A first disbursement plan was prepared and attached to the contract. This plan may be adjusted following the agreement on the implementation plans.

90. Preparation of implementation plan is an important exercice for Dong Thap as it may help stakeholders involved (SC & WG) to take ownership of the IRP. Up to now, IRP was seen as an imposed program by ADB/CIPM/DDIS. In Can Tho ownership of the IRP is done since the beginning.

7. SOCIAL ACTION PLAN

7.1 Capacity Building on Gender

91. A first round of training workshops on capacity building for gender mainstreaming was conducted in Dong Thap province and Can Tho City in September 2014. A second round will start in April 2015. As requested by ADB/DFAT in their comments on the QR #5, members of CFLD/CHFLD will be included.

7.2 Employment Opportunities for the Local People

92. As part of the social action plan, employment of local people has to be promoted. Information related to employment of local people during construction were collected and were presented in the QR #5. One of the results of the survey was that women represent only 1% of the local employment out of the 12% of the local employees. A specific survey to identify any obstacles for local women to be recruited will be conducted in April –May 2015.

93. The social and gender specialist will be mobilized in April and May 2015 and will conduct these activities.

8. HIV/AIDS AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING PREVENTION PROGRAM

94. The following activities were conducted during the last 3 months.

95. Training Workshop. The Year 1 training workshops were organized in November and December 2014. The training was given to; i) district and commune implementing partners; ii) outreach educators (OE); and iii) for peer education (PE). Four trainings were organized in Dong Thap and two in Can

Tho,

96. Information Education & Communication (IEC). 4000 leaflets, 720 posters for HAPP/HTPP and 60 peer educators’ kits were distributed.

97. Condom distribution: 25.000 condoms were distributed in the project area;

98. Provincial Aids Center (PAC) in Dong Thap and Can Tho carried out the outreach educators and peer educators activities (December 2014, January 2015). These activities include:

Group meeting for peer educators and women and supporting meetings for outreach educators;

Organize IEC and Behaviour Change Communication (BCC) campaigns;


19

99. Supervise the HAPP/HTPP activities carried out by PAC: i) group meeting, IEC and Behaviour Change Communication (BCC) campaigns; and ii) mobile service for HIV/STIs screening, testing and consultancy (April, 2015);

100. Workplace HAPP

The following documents were prepared and submitted to CIPM: - Second submission the TOR and cost estimated for HAPP of CW1B have adjusted

following the MOT’s comments. The subcontractor for HAPP of CWs: It is The Investment and Environment Protection Consultant Company (EPC Co.,LTD)

- The TOR for HAPP of CW1A and CW1C

Review and submit to CIPM the cost estimate for HAPP activities of the remaining CWs: 1A, 1C, 2A, 2B, 2C (April, 2015)

Support the subcontractor to conduct the first training courses for HAPP at the work places (May, 2015).

9. MONITORING INDICATORS

101. This section includes the progress against monitoring indicators as agreed with the M&E advisor. However some data are not yet available now.

9.1 Land Acquisition and Resettlement

102. Regarding indicators for land acquisition and resettlement, Table 15 summarizes the first results. However, some data are not yet available now.

Table 15: Indicators for Land Acquisition and Resettlement

Indicator Units Resettlement Plan Implementation Remarks

Land acquisition

HH

Dong Thap: 1,336 Can Tho: 219 Total: 1,555

Dong Thap: 1,515 Can Tho: 258 Total: 1,773

Changes are due to : i) adjustment of number of HHs in Construction Yard; ii) some HH with several families were first considered as one AH and were then separated in 2 or more AHs; and iii) a number of HH, affected by loss of grave only were first not included among the AHs (Can Tho city); (iv) new access road in Tinh Thoi commune;

Ha Dong Thap: 199.7 Can Tho: 54.8 Total: 254.5

Dong Thap: 190 Can Tho: 28.5 Total: 218.5

Changes are due to : i) reduced area for construction yards; and ii) toll plaza removed;

Disbursement of compensation & allowances

Billion VND Total

Dong Thap: 45.3 M USD Can Tho: 8.8 M USD Total: 54.1 M USD

Dong Thap: 39.2 M USD Can Tho: 8.4 Total: 47.6 M USD

Compensation in component 2 was delayed 6 months

Disbursement of compensation & allowances within agreed time limit

% Total

Dong Thap: 95% Can Tho: 84% Total: 93%


20

Indicator Units Resettlement Plan Implementation Remarks

Compensation plans agreed jointly by husband and spouse

% eligible cases

N/A

33% 45 cases)

During all interviews with AHs, such issue was assessed; husband signed in 38% of cases; wife 16 %, both 33% and other members 13%; it is suggested that the External Monitor will also include this question during his interviews in the next mission (planned July 2015).

Provision of consultation counselling

Activity completion

Dong Thap: 36 HH Can Tho: 22 HH

Consultation with vulnerable HH and with relocated HH;

Households self-relocated

Total HH

Dong Thap: 23 Can Tho: N/A

Dong Thap: 296 Can Tho: 53

More HH opted for self-relocation during implementation; possible reasons: i) cash grant allowance for self-relocation; ii) distance of RS from affected area; 3 HH not yet decided type of relocation; Most of the relocated HH who received a plot in RS didn’t yet relocate (only 27 AH built house in RS)

Households relocated to service resettlement site

Total HH

Dong Thap: 415 Can Tho: N/A

Dong Thap: 18/170 Can Tho: 9/43

LURC / asset titles issued jointly in husband and spouse names

% Total eligible % eligible Vul HH

Few LURC issued up to now to relocated HH (LURC will be issued once land use fee will be paid)

Resettlement completed within agreed time limit

% Total % Vul. HH

Major delay for resettlement & compensation for component 2 due to delay in loan effectiveness;

Beneficiaries satisfied with compensation counselling

See comment above on provision of consultation counselling

Outstanding cases of grievance with compensation rates for land

Dong Thap: 22 Can Tho City: 1

Beneficiary satisfaction with resettlement site

Dong Thap: 100% Can Tho City: 100%

18 HH relocated up to now in RS in Dong Thap and 9 in Can Tho; Up to now all satisfied based on interviews;

Outstanding cases of grievance with resettlement process

Dong Thap: 38 Can Tho City: 0

This indicator doesn’t cover grievance for compensation but for other aspects (relocation issues, adjustment of affected land etc.)


21

9.2 Income Restoration Plan

103. Implementation of IRP just started and few data was available at the time of the preparation of this report. The following table will be completely filled when data will be available.

Table 16: Indicators for Income Restoration Plan

Indicator Units Income Restoration Plan Implementation

Dong Thap Can Tho

Implementation of IRP activities against plan:

Agriculture

Training

Small business

% Total

0%

0%

Implementation of IRP to start in April 2015 in both Can Tho and Dong Thap

Participation in IRP activities against plan

Agriculture

Training

Small business

% Total % Vulnerable HH % Women

Dong Thap

- Agriculture 72% Total % Vulnerable HH % Women

- Training 5% Total % Vulnerable HH % Women

- Small business

23% Total % Vulnerable HH % Women

Can Tho

- Agriculture 38 % Total % Vulnerable HH % Women

- Training 37 % Total % Vulnerable HH % Women

- Small business

25% Total % Vulnerable HH % Women

Overall expenditure of IRP against plan

Agriculture

Training

Small business

VND Total

N/A

9.3 HIV/AIDS and Human Trafficking Prevention program

104. Implementation of HIV/AIDS and Human Trafficking Program started for packages CW1A and CW1B only. Data for other packages are not available.


22

Table 17: Indicators for HIV/AIDS and Human Trafficking Program

Indicator Units

Packages CW1B & CW3A only. Other packages CW1A, CW1C, CW2A, CW2B, CW2C, CW3B not yet started

Implementation of awareness raising activities against plan

HIV/AIDS for CW3A

HAPP and HTPP for community

100% completion for CW3A (training, group meeting),

100 % completion (training, IEC material, condom and Peers Educator’s kit distribution) 80 % completion

Participation in activities against plan

HIV/AIDS for all packages CWs

HAPP and HTPP for community - Capacity strengthening of institutional

stakeholders - Advocacy - IEC and BCC - Medical package - Monitoring and evaluation

100% completion for CW3A (HIV/STIs examine and testing), the other packaged CWs not yet started

100% completion

50% completion

50% completion

50% completion

100% completion

Overall expenditure against plan

HIV/AIDS for CW3A

HAPP and HTPP for community (DDIS)

Not available

1.158.937.063 VND, planned 1.159.151.128 VND

Learning and satisfaction with HAPP training activities

Implementing partners at district and commune levels

Construction workers

Female Sex Workers

Completed first year training workshops in Dong Thap

and Can Tho

100 % demonstrating adequate learning, 100 % satisfaction

% demonstrating adequate learning, % satisfaction (N/A)

100% demonstrating adequate learning, 100% satisfaction

Learning and satisfaction with HTPP training activities

Implementing partners at district and commune levels

Female Sex Workers

Completed first year training workshops in Dong Thap

and Can Tho




23

Annex 1: List of HH Located in the Loop, Eligible to IRP but not Included in the IRP List

# Name Loss of Agricuture

land (m2) Loss of Garden

Land (m2)

An Binh Commune (IC NH30)

4 Đoàn Hữu Sang 1370,3

5 Đoàn Hữu Thảo 3202,3

6 Đoàn Hữu Hiếu 1924,1

33 Nguyễn Văn Chưởng 1630,4

10 Đinh Văn Tòng 2675

38 Lê Phi Hùng 426,1

Tan My Commune (IC PR 849)

1 Phan Văn Tâm 1037,06

7 Huznh Thị Mén 1690,93

34 Dương Thành Văn 1793,34

35 Nguyễn Thị Nuôi 1002,46

43 Nguyễn Thị Hai 1796,55

Binh Thanh Commune (IC NH 80)

23 Nguyễn Hùng Cường 1122,7

24 Lê Thị Dũng 598,9

42 Nguyễn Ngọc Nhung 9807,2

43 Nguyễn Hoàng Ở 2700,3

56 Phạm Văn Thử 4005

Dinh An Commune (IC NH 54)

1 Lê Ph Tông 1638,9

34 Nguyễn Văn Bò 2706,9

37 Mai Văn Đài 2024,3

57 Nguyễn Văn Rớt 2140,6

59 Phan Văn Sáu 2898,5


24

Annex 2: Information on Households Met in February - March 2015

Name of AP 1. Doan Van Lo HH affected by local project

Address An Binh Commune, Dong Thap Province

Age/ Nb of persons in the family 76 / 2 (1M, 1 F)

Main source of income Raising pigs

Vulnerable No

Project Impacts

Affected by local project (bypass Cao Lanh City implemented by DoT) and located in the loop of the IC; Not affected by the CMDCP but CMDCP now use the RoW of the local project;

No agricultural land affected;

Lost house and residential land closes NH 30: Lost 312 m2 of residential land;

Met CHLFD 3 times since 2010 to request compensation but CHLFD said they have no budget;

HH don’t know when they will receive compensation

HH will relocate after receiving compensation Relocation Issue Plan to self-relocate if the loop is cleared; Signing of compensation documents Only husband signed compensation documents;

Husband name on LURC;

Location of HH Mr.Doan Van Lo and his house

Comments As indicated in section 4.4, no budget is available for this local project. Dong Thap PC decided to use ADB loan for these people; Mr. Doan Van Lo is included in the list of 10 HH submitted compensation plans to DONRE; Information is needed for these AHs on status of compensation;


25

Name of AP 2. Doan Thi Tu HH affected by local project

Address An Binh Commune, Dong Thap Province

Age/ Nb of persons in the family 37 1 (1M 1F)

Main source of income Worker

Vulnerable Landless (living on her father land Mr. Doan Van Lo)

Project Impacts

Lost house with area is 32 m2 (4mx8m) close to NH 30:

No LURC for house;

With father (Mr. Doan Van Lo) have met Co LFD 3 times to request compensation but CHLFD said they have no budget to compensate

HH will relocate after receiving compensation Relocation Issue Expect to be resettled into My Tho RS ( buy plot);

Compensation will be used to built new house; Signing of compensation documents

Her house built on her father’s land;

Name on LURC is father’s name

Location of HH Her house is behind of her father’s house (photo) and is mainly in temporary materials;

Comments

Landless HH As indicated in section 4.4, no budget is available for this local project. Dong Thap PC decided to use ADB loan for these people; Her father Mr. Doan Van Lo is included in the list of 10 HH submitted compensation plans to DONRE; she expect to have a separate plot in RS. Information is needed for these AHs on status of compensation;


26

Name of AP 3. Nguyen Thi Huong

Address An Binh commune Tel: 01203682446

Age/ Nb of persons in the family 71/1 1 female; elderly living alone

Main source of income Pension

Vulnerable Poor household during DMS, after received compensation, local authority did not issue new certificate of poor HH;

Project Impacts When received compensation

Lost house and residential land:

Part of the house (back of the house) affected only; Received compensation and allowances (100 M VND);

Relocation Issues HH received plot in My Tho RS but didn’t relocate; Spend all her money to pay debt;

HH plan to stay in the remaining part of the house (front) not affected , which was repaired;

Received invitation to hand over plot in RS but want to stay in the house; Intend to sell plot in RS in order to have money to repair and improve house;

Satisfied with compensation and assistance received?

HH is not satisfied with compensation (compensation rates too low)

Who signed: i) DMS; ii) document for compensation? Which name on LURC?

Mrs Huong signed DMS and Compensation documents

Mrs. Huong has her name on LURC;

Did you register for IRP Not interested to join IRP (too old) and no other member in the HH

Interviewing to HH Remaining house close to the ramp of the interchange

Comments: Assist HH to remain on existing house if found safe;


27

Name of AP 4. Huyhn Tan Si (HH relocated in the loop of IC with OR 849(

Ward/commune Tan My commune/ Phone: 0939368601

Age/ Number of persons in the family 44/3 1 Male 2 Female

Main source of income Farmer

Vulnerable Yes/No What type? Yes, poor household during DMS, after received compensation, local authority did not issue new certificate of Poor to the HH;


Lost house and residential land: 138 m2

received compensation (2011)

Relocated HH Yes/No Yes, self relocation on remaining land part of family land in loop of interchange;

Paid fees to install; get LURC for remaining land;

Received grant for relocation;

Satisfied with relocation;

Satisfied with compensation received? Satisfied with compensation and allowances;

Gender issue

Who signed: i) DMS; ii) document for compensation? Name on the LURC?

Husband signed DMS and Compensation documents

Land belonged to Husband’s mother Husband name on LURC;

Relocation issues HH received plot in RS but changed his mind and received 45 M đ to self-relocate on remaining land part of family;

Currently, HH is cultivating remaining agricultural land in the loop (cultivating chilli)

What did u do with compensation received?

Compensation received 2,54 B đ , and divided this money equally for his 6 children;

Built new house, rent land for cultivation;

Did you register for IRP? If yes for which activity?

Yes , participate allowance for cultivating crop and flower (Chrysanthemum and tuberose)

Interviewing to HH Cultivating chilli on remaining land part

Comments: Avoid HH implement IRP (flower cultivation) in the loop, as he may be cleared in the future)


28

Name of AP 5. Nguyen Thi Minh Su

(self-relocating HH) Ward/commune Binh Thanh commune/ Phone: 0129012273

Age/ Number of persons in the family 46/3 2M 1F

Main source of income Hired labor

Vulnerable Yes/No What type? Yes landless

Project Impacts Lost house; received compensation (06/2014) Satisfied with compensation and assistance received? Not satisfied by compensation (low compensation rate

for house and land)

Self-relocation Issues

Did-u contact local authorities to build your house?

How did u choose your land?

Commune PC gave verbal agreement to build house but didn’t issue permit;

Old sister gave land (100 m2) to build house (residential + garden land with LURC)

If already self-relocated:

Source of water?

Fees paid (electricity & water connection, LURC, other)

Receive grant relocation allowance?

Satisfaction with relocation

Yes, relocated part of sister’s land at 2.5 km of former location with area of 100 m2, currently HH is constructing new house

Connected to tap water system;

Paid fees ( electricity; water connection....); received allowance for relocation

Not satisfied (close to NH 80);

Who signed: i) DMS; ii) document for compensation?

Which name(s) is (are) on the LURC?

Wife signed documents ( DMS and Compensation documents )

Doesn’t have LURC yet; living on her sister’s land

What did u do with compensation received? Compensation used to build new house

Did you register for IRP? If yes for which activity? Yes, participate; chose to get a motorcycle to serve as Xe Ôm

Other comments Compensation is not sufficient to build new house

Interviewing to HH Dismantling of old house to remove to new house


29

Name of AP 6. Le Hoang Vu

(self-relocating HH) Ward/commune Binh Thanh commune/ Phone: 0985338123

Age/ Number of persons in the family 39/4 2 M 2F

Main source of income Hired labour

Vulnerable Yes/No What type? No


Lost house and residential land of 60 m2

received compensation (06/2014)

Relocated HH Yes/No yes

Satisfied with compensation and assistance received? Not satisfied of compensation ( low compensation rate for land

and house )


Source of water? Fees paid (elec. & water connection, LURC, other)



Yes, relocated on land bought near old house (area : 120 m2

with cost of 180 M đ ( have LURC)

Connected to tap- water system

Paid fees (electricity; water connection....); received allowance

for relocation

Not satisfied because has to borrow money to pay land and

build new house

Who signed: i) DMS; ii) document for compensation?


Wife and husband signed documents ( DMS and Compensation

documents )

Husband name on LURC




Aware of land use master plan?

HH didn’t ask to local authority because he knew land was for residential purpose based on master plan;

Bought residential land to construct new house Yes aware (posted at commune PPC);

Did you register for IRP? Yes, participate; activity chosen : raising cow

Any other comment? Compensation is 216 m đ not sufficient to construct new house

Propose to receive additional allowanced to build house

Interviewing to HH House under construction at new location


30

Name of AP 7. Tran Minh Hoang

(self-relocating HH) Ward/commune Binh Thanh commune /Tel: 0985338123

Age/ Number of persons in the family 59/5 2 Male 2 Female




Lost house and residential land of 168 m2



Satisfied with compensation and assistance received? satisfied of compensation


Source of water?

Fees paid (elec. & water connection, LURC, other)


Yes, relocated on remaining land part with house remaining area of 85 m2 (residential and garden land)


Didn’t pay fees (electricity; water connection....)

Received allowance for relocation

Satisfaction because still stay near old location

Who signed: i) DMS; ii) document for compensation? Which name is on the LURC?

Husband signed documents ( DMS and Compensation documents )


Agriculture land affected Bought agricultural land (450 m2) ,distance to house about 3km with cost of 150 M đ; Purpose to reserve for his child;

Did you register for IRP? If yes for which activity? Yes, participate; activity chosen : small business


Did-u contact local authorities to build your

house?



Yes, HH went to Commune PC to ask permit for repair and Commune PC said that HH do not need new permit because only repair old house on remaining land;

Repair house on remaining land;

Yes aware

Interviewing to HH House is being dismantled and going to be repaired


31

Name of AP 8. Nguyen Huu Mang

(self-relocating HH) Address Binh Thanh Commune, Dong Thap Province


Main source of income Business

Vulnerable No


Lost house and residential land is 260 m2




Satisfied with compensation received;


Source of water?




Yes, bought residential land , distance old location is 200 m with area of 150 m2, cost: 220 M đ

Connected to tap water system

HH paid fees (electricity; water connection....) and received allowance for relocation

Satisfaction because still near old location

Gender issue

Who signed: I) DMS; ii) document for compensation?


Husband signed documents (DMS and Compensation documents )

Husband name on LURC


Yes, participate

Activity chosen : raising pig





HH went to Commune PC and get agreement to build house; Built on garden land;

Close to former location;

HH aware of master plan through map at commune PC’s office; knew he bought land not in compliance with the plan but with agreement of local authorities;

Interviewing to HH New House at new location

Comments: as relocation site was agreed with local authorities, HH should ask for change of land use purpose from garden land to residential land;


32

Name of AP 9. Thai Thi Duyen

Address Binh Thanh Commune, Dong Thap Province


Main source of income Hired labour

Vulnerable Yes. Poor HH


Lost house and residential and garden lands of 191 m2 ; received compensation in 07/2014;


Satisfied with compensation & assistance? Not satisfied of compensation because low rate


Source of water?




Yes, bought garden land , distance old location is 1 km with area of 160 m2, cost is 130 M đ. Remaining land part is about 74 m2


Paid fees (electricity; water connection....); received allowance for relocation

Partially satisfied;



Wife signed documents ( DMS and Compensation documents )

Wife name on Co LUR

Agriculture land affected

Did u buy other agriculture land? If yes where? Which rate?

Compensated 390 M đ, bought garden land : 130 M đ with area is 160 m2;

Remaining money paid debt and built new house;


Yes, participate

Activity choice : raising Cow





Didn’t ask local authorities to build new house; local authorities went to visit the plot and didn’t prevent construction

Choose land close to HH that already built new house and follow them;

Interviewing to HH Dismantling of old house and remaining land part along HW 80

Comments: as relocation site was agreed with local authorities, HH should ask for change of land use purpose in case land is not residential land;


33

Name of AP 10. Nguyen Hong Chau

(HH located in loop of IC with NH 80)

Ward/commune Binh Thanh commune Phone: 0919959955

Age/ Number of persons in the family 60/4 1 M 3 F

Main source of income Retired, sell beverage Vulnerable Yes/No What type? no Project Impacts When received compensation

Lost house and garden land ( 155 m2+ 1500 m2

Received compensation (06/2014)

Satisfied with compensation and assistance received? Satisfied of compensation however low rate

Relocation No relocation; repair old house;

Gender issue



Husband signed documents ( DMS and Compensation documents )




Yes affected 1500 m2

Didn’t buy new land; sent compensation to the Bank

Are u informed of the possible land acquisition of the loop?

Do you continue to cultivate?

Including the agriculture land in the loop what % of agriculture land is affected?

What are your concerns if the land is not acquired in the IC? Access? Pollution etc? Safety?

CHLFD informed HH, made survey and contacted with HH;

Yes, currently cultivating water caltrops

Agricultural land in loop is 3500 m2, if land acquisition for loop part will affect 100% of HH land;

Difficulties met: access , pollution ...

Business affected Small business but not registered

IRP


Yes, participate

Activity chosen : raise Pig

Interviewing to HH Remaining area in loop is cultivating water caltrops

Comments: Prevent HH to implement IRP (raising pigs) in the loop of the IC, as he may be cleared in the future)


34

Name of AP 11. Nguyen Van Mai (HH located in loop of IC with NH 80)




Vulnerable Yes/No What type? no


Affected agricultural land (3000 m2)


Satisfied with compensation and assistance received? Yes satisfied

Relocation No relocation

Gender issue



Husband signed documents (DMS and Compensation documents )




Yes ,affected 3000 m2 of agricultural land; compensation is 1.6 B Đ

Didn’t buy land; used compensation for construction of new house ( 800 M đ) and remaining send into Bank





No information

Currently cultivating water caltrops in the loop;

Agricultural land in loop is 4000 m2, land acquisition area is 3000 m2 if land acquisition for loop part will affect 100%

HH doesn’t know if he will continue cultivation or build house in remaining land part of the loop? Propose recover for all remaining land part in loop.

Business affected No

IRPDid you register for IRP? If yes for which activity? Yes, participate; activity chosen : raising cow

Other comments No comment

Interviewing to HH New house built with compensation ( 1,6 B đ)


35

Comments: Prevent HH to implement IRP (raising cow) in the loop of the IC, as he may be cleared in the future)

Name of AP 12. Phan Thi Moi (HH located in loop of IC with NH 80)






Affected agricultural land ( 1500 m2 )


Satisfied with compensation and assistance received? Yes satisfied

Relocation No relocation

Gender issue



Wife signed documents (DMS and Compensation documents)

Wife name on LURC



Yes, affected 1500 m2 of agricultural land, compensation is 300 M Đ;

Bought fertilizer to increase production and remaining amount deposited at a Bank;





No information

Currently HH is cultivating rice

Agricultural land in loop is 3000 m2; land acquisition area is 1500 m2 if land acquisition for loop part will be affected 100%;

Concerned by access, pollution. Want the project to acquire all remaining land in loop.

IRPDid you register for IRP? If yes for which activity? Yes, participate; activity chosen : raising cow

Other comments No other comment

Interviewing to HH Decision of land acquisition and hand over of land

Comments: Prevent HH to implement IRP (raising cow) in the loop of the IC, as he may be cleared in the future)


36

Name of AP 13. Pham Van Kep (HH located in loop of IC with NH 30)

Ward/commune An Binh commune Phone: 01677007562


Main source of income Business of ornamental trees


Project Impacts Affected house & garden land; compensated (2013)

Satisfied with compensation and assistance received? Not satisfied : low rate

Relocation Yes

Gender issue



Son (Pham Thanh Phuong) signed documents (DMS & Compensation documents )

Father name (Pham Van Ket) on LURC


Did u buy other agriculture land? Yes ,affected garden land and residential land

Didn’t buy land; compensation deposited at a Bank;

Are u informed of the possible land acquisition of the loop? Do you continue to cultivate?



No information that remaining land part in loop will be acquired; Still continue cultivation

If agricultural land in loop is recovered , the family will be lose 100% of its land;

Concerns to be compensated at market rate; want to buy new land but may be difficult;

IRPDid you register for IRP? If yes for which activity? Yes, participate Activity choice : raise Cow

Interviewing to HH ( son : Pham Thanh Phuong) Cultivate ornamental tree ( apricot trees) in the loop

Comments: Prevent HH to implement IRP (raising cow)

in the loop of the IC, as he may be cleared in the

future)


37

Name of AP 14. Pham Thi Dieu

(HH located in loop of IC with NH 30)



Main source of income Small retail business



Affected yard, garden land , house; received compensation (11/2013); currently HH has no income;

Satisfied with compensation and assistance received? Not satisfied : low rate

Relocation No

Gender issue



Documents on agriculture land were signed by husband and documents for garden land by wife;

Husband and wife have both name on LURC (2 LURC: 1 for residential land; 1 for garden land )


Did u buy other agriculture land? If yes where? Which

rate?

Yes, affected garden land : total of garden land: 7400 m2; land acquisition area: 3300 m2; remaining land part in loop is 4100 m2 (garden land). Residential land is 319 m2, lost: 104 m2 , remaining residential land: 205 m2;

Didn’t buy land; compensation money deposited at a Bank or used for business;

Now HH is looking to buy new garden land; compensation sufficient to buy new land

Are u informed of the possible land acquisition of the

loop?


Including the agriculture land in the loop what % of

agriculture land is affected?

What are your concerns if the land is not acquired in

the IC? Access? Pollution etc? Safety?

No information of remaining land part in loop ; this land part will be required

Still continuing cultivation, but no income because more trees dry die

If garden land in loop ( 4100 m2) is recovered , the family will be recovered 100% ( affected 100% is 7400 m2)

Concerns: irrigation for trees on remaining garden land in loop (no water because construction have block water way. No access and pollution


IRP Did you register for IRP? If yes for which activity? Yes; activity chosen: support for business


38

Interviewing to HH ( wife) Mango trees on remaining Land part in loop is being

get dried because no water to irrigate

Location of agriculture land in the loop of the interchange


39

Name of AP 15. Pham Ngoc Anh (HH located in loop of IC with NH 30)





Project Impacts

When received compensation

Affected house and garden land : garden land: 1200 m2; residential land: 200 m2;



Not satisfied : low rate, propose to receive additional allowance;


Source of water?




Already relocated into An Binh residential area

Connected to tap water system;

Paid fees (electricity & water connection, LURC etc.

Yes; received grant relocation allowance

No satisfied by relocation (far from agriculture land); because farmer

Gender issue



Mrs Anh (mother) signed documents (DMS and Compensation documents )

Mother name (Pham Ngoc Anh ) on LURC



Yes ,affected garden land (1200 m2) and residential land (200 m2)

Didn’t buy land; compensation amount used to buy plot in My Tho RS; compensation received sufficient to buy plot in My Tho RS





- Received information for acquisition for remaining have land part in loop (500 m2) acquired

- Do not cultivate due to lack of water and access; - If Agricultural land in loop is recovered (500 m2) ,

the family will be lost 100% of its land; - Concerns of water to irrigate remaining land part in

loop ; concerns regarding access and safety


IRPDid you register for IRP? If yes for which activity? Yes, activity chosen : raising cow;


40

Interviewing to HH ( son : Nguyen Minh Duc) at house is being dismantling

Land in loop is not cultivated because water irrigation interrupted and close construction site

Comments: Prevent HH to implement IRP (raising cow)

in the loop of the IC, as he may be cleared in the

future);


41

Annex 3 : List of Pending Grievances

1. DONG THAP PROVINCE

No Name of HH Contents of grievance and action taken

Date of

grievance Status of resolution up to 20/03/2015

I AN BINH COMMUNE

1 Increase of compensation rate for residential land

1.1 13 HH: - Vũ Văn Sách - Vũ Văn Phùng - Hoàng Ngọc Quang - Vũ Văn Bình - Nguyễn Văn Hổ - Lê Minh Chí - Nguyễn Thị Thanh Tâm - Phạm Ngọc Ánh - Nguyễn Minh Đức - Nguyễn Thị Lan - Nguyễn Văn Triếu - Nguyễn Văn Lộc - Nguyễn Trí Cường

- RCS conducted by SIAC in early 2014; - On 27/May/2014 based on RCS Cao Lanh

District submitted a document with new proposed land rate in location 1: at 4,95 M vnd/ m2; the document approved by Cao Lanh district PC to be submitted to Dong Thap PPC for reviewing and approving;

- HH still not satisfied with compensation rates; new survey conducted with a rate of 5,860,000 VND/m2;

November 2013 to

February 2014

- Dong Thap PC approved residential land rate for location 1: 5,860,000;

- The compensation plan for 5 HHs: Lê Minh Chí, Vũ Văn Sách, Vũ Văn Phùng, Hoàng Ngọc Quang, Vũ Văn Bình was approved on 04/02/2015. Lê Minh Chí HH received compensation and handed-over land in February, 2015. 4 HHs: Vũ Văn Sách, Vũ Văn Phùng, Hoàng Ngọc Quang, Vũ Văn Bình disagreed and request to increase 10% of land price.

- The compensation plan for 8 HHs: Nguyễn Văn Hổ, Nguyễn Thị Thanh Tâm, Phạm Ngọc Ánh, Nguyễn Minh Đức, Nguyễn Thị Lan, Nguyễn Văn Triếu, Nguyễn Văn Lộc, Nguyễn Trí Cường is being reviewed by Appraisal Council and it is expected to be submitted to Dong Thap PC for approval in April 2015.

1.2 04 HHs/ 13 HHs - Nguyễn Văn Hổ - Nguyễn Thị Thanh Tâm - Nguyễn Thị Lan - Nguyễn Văn Lộc

- Adjustment for land location. - CHLFD Propose to adjust land location following

Decision No 38/2012/QĐ-UBND to be submitted to Council for reviewing

-

November 2013 to

February 2014

- Local authorities disagreed to change adjustment for land location;

- Agree to apply new residential land rate for location 1: 5,860,000 VND/m2


42


Date of


2 Propose to received plots in resettlement sites

2.1 11 HHs (Bình, Phùng, Sách, Quang, Chi, Thơm, Lộc, Nhân, Lan, Triếu, Trân):

- 11 HHs requested to be resettled at My Phu RS; - However this RS is reserved in priority for

government staffs and no remaining plot is available.

- On 11/June/2014 CHLFD and Cao Lanh District PC organized meeting with the HHs and HHs agreed to be relocated at RS of General Hospital of Dong Thap province and 1 at My Tho RS.

November 2013 to

February 2014

PPC approved in February 2015; grievances solved; HH to build house in RS;

2.2 10 HH Vũ Văn Bình, Vũ Văn Phùng, Vũ Văn Sách, Lê Ngọc Quang, Lê Thị Thu Chi, Vũ Thị Thơm, Nguyễn Văn Lộc, Nguyễn Văn Nhân, Nguyễn Thị Lan, Nguyễn Văn Triếu)

- 10 HH choose to RS of General Hospital of Dong Thap Province including:; 1 HH (Nguyễn Thị Bảo Trân) choose to RS of My Tho town

November 2013 to

February 2014

3 Increase compensation for non-land assets

3.1 Le Minh Chi Wood Processing Factory - An agreement was reached with Mr. Le Minh Ch

in December 2014 regarding rates for land and structures; Mr Le Minh Chi received compensation, dismantled the factory and handed over his land.

- However he made a new complaint in January 2015; he wants compensation for garden land with the same rate as residential land;

22 January 2015

- Complaint under review


43


Date of


3.2 03 HHs (Quang, Bình, Chi) at Huong Thao petrol station:

Huong Thao Petrol Station - An agreement was reached in December 2014

and compensation plan was submitted to Dong Thap PC on 15/12/2014.

- However the owners have now new request: i) Same compensation rate for all land (not divided into categories or raise of 10% of compensation for land if CHFLD is keeping 2 categories; According to them because the petrol station is a special business, compensation should take this into account.

- On 20 March 2015, PC of Cao Lanh District met them to reach an agreement.

November 2013 to

February 2014

- Report and recommendations by Appraisal committee und under preparation.

4 - Increase compensation for house and structure

4.1 3 HHs Lan, Lộc, Triếu: - Currently review and estimation based on drawings and estimated cost

November 2013 to

February 2014

- Household agreed with proposals of CDHLF, the compensation plan is being reviewed by Appraisal Council and it is expected to submit Dong Thap PC for approval in April 2015.

4.2 Mrs Thom - According to Decision No.1232/QĐ-UBND dated on 26/12/1012, average compensation rate for Thơm’s house: 1,047,000 VND/m2. Mrs Thom proposed compensation rate for house C4: 2,356,000 VND/m2.

- Household agreed with proposals of Working Team; it was approved in February 2015.

5 Other cases

5.1 Nguyễn Văn Triếu - Propose to receive allowance for small business: allowance level is 1M vnd/ month x 6 months

- Proposal of allowance is 1 M vnd/ month x 6 months, to be submitted


44


Date of


for each HH

5.2 Nguyễn Trí Cường - Compensation for land outside of the ROW. - Rejected: No land acquisition outside of ROW for this phase;

II WARD 3

1 Phan Trần Anh Huệ - Request increase of allowance for grave relocation: Proposal of construction cost: 33 M vnd/ 1 grave (covered by granit) not including relocation cost .

- PC of Cao Lanh City is co-ordinating with CHLFD to propose compensation plan to PPC. Now, CDHLF is preparing proposal report to discuss with PC of Cao Lanh City

2 Phan Trần Anh Huệ - Proposal to buy plot in RS. - Organized 1 meeting on 09/10/2013 by Council

of PPC and collecting information on HH situation; land acquisition of large area of residential land to submit to Council of PPC for reviewing


3 Phan Thị Ngọc Hạnh - Proposal of compensation rate for bonsai trees and no allowance to remove trees.

- CHLFD confirmed compensation for tree , only compensated for relocation cost following minute No 11 dated 21/9/2012 of Compensation council

November 2013 to

February 2014

- CHLFD surveyed tree and propose to compensate (not relocation cost)

4 Phan Thị Ngọc Hạnh Phan Trần Anh Cúc Phan Thị Nguyệt

- Refused compensation; want the Project to allocate plot in RS for HH Ms Hue (3 HHs are complaining, they are sisters with Ms Hue).



45


Date of


5 Phan Thị Ngọc Hạnh - HH request to be compensated for the entire of house; the house is inside the safety corridor: Minute of Meeting organized by compensation council confirmed land acquisition is not necessary;

- House is affected by another project (access to waste water treatment plant for Cao Lanh city)

- Public Disclosure of compensation Plan dated 18/03/2014, Submit to PPC for approval

- PC of Cao Lanh City is co-ordinating with CHLFD to propose compensation plan to PPC. Now, CHLFD is preparing proposal report to discuss with PC of Cao Lanh City

III - TINH THOI COMMUNE

1 Mr Đặng Văn Sáu - HH requested to be allocated one additional plot in RS

- CHLFD proposed to provide one additional plot in RS and

submitted to PC of Cao Lanh City. Not yet approved

2 Đặng Văn Sáu & Đặng Văn Sậu

- Dispute on land

07/07/2014 - Currently the dispute has not been resolved

3 Nguyễn Thị Duy Thanh Nguyễn Văn Hủ (the old owner)

- Before DMS, Mr. Nguyễn Văn Hủ borrowed money from the bank and couldn’t reimburse. There was a decision of the Executive Court of Cao Lanh City to sell his land through auction. Nguyễn Thị Duy Thanh won the auction and got the LURC.

- Ms Nguyễn Thị Duy Thanh received compensation according to the conclusion of Executive Court of Cao Lanh City; However DMS was signed by Mr. Nguyễn Văn Hủ

- Mr Hủ requests compensation. Until now, he has not handed-over land and issue grievances.

- Dong Thap decided to bring the case at the

26/04/2014

- The Supreme People's Procuratorate is reviewing documents for this HH and will have conclusion in April, 2015.


46


Date of


Supreme People's Procuratorate;

IV TAN MY COMMUNE

1 PROPOSAL OF LAND RATE INCREASE

1.2 5 HH - 5 HHs requested to increase agricultural land rate increase and land acquisition for land is outside of ROW

June 2013 - Affected area of these HHs is quite little, CIPM/DDIS to

adjust technical design and to avoid these HHs

2 13 HHs - Request compensation for irrigation ditch closed to road; during DMS all irrigation ditches have been identified as public assets; HH claimed they are the owners of the irrigation ditches;

- Dated 19/05/2014, Lap Vo district PC organized meetings with HHs and proposed compensation and allowance to HHs and will submit to PPC for approval

- Lap Vo District is assessing which irrigation ditches and road along ditches are public and which one belong to AH;

- May 2014

- Lap Vo district PC proposed compensation for road part which is contiguous with Tham Thay ditch for 4 HHs: Nguyễn Văn Quới, Nguyễn Pha Lê, Nguyễn Thị Kim Loan và Nguyễn Văn Ẩn..

- Currently CHLFD didn’t prepare additional plan for these 4 HHs

- Requirement of compensation as per LURC for 2 HHs: Nguyễn Pha Lê và Nguyễn Thị Kim Loan.

- HH: Nguyen Kim Lang. Lap Vo district PC decided not to request compensation for land road part with surface width of 3.5 m (on whole land of Ms Lang) . Remaining part of HH Nguyen Thi Lang is planted with Eucalyptus. Propose to compensate for land planted with eucalyptus.

- Currently CHLFD didn’t prepare additional compensation plan for this HH

- District PC disagreed compensation for irrigation ditch land part is contiguous with HH’s land

- HH: Le Van Hau and Tran Van Hoa: District PC agreed compensation for irrigation ditch part to Mr Hau and Hoa


47


Date of


- The additional compensation Plan for these HHs submitted to DONRE on 23/10/2104 and The Aprraisal Committee is arranging time to review.

-

3 11 HHs - These HHs request to support for cost ground elevation

- CHDLF submitted the additional compensation plan

and Appraisal Council rejected to support for these HHs

V - MY AN HUNG B COMMUNE -

1 - 58 HHs - 56 HHs requested to compensation for irrigation ditch and road;

- 6 HHs requested compensation for pond. - PC of Lap Vo District co-odinated with CHFLD

and CPC to survey at the site

August 2014

- Base on the result of survey, CDHLF is completing the additional compensation plan to submit to Appraisal Council. It is expected to approve in April 2015.

VI - BINH THANH TRUNG COMMUNE -

1 - 21 HHs - 15 HHs requested to compensation for irrigation ditch and road;

- PC of Lap Vo District co-odinated to CDHLF and CPC to survey at the site

June to August 2014

- CDHLF submitted the additional compensation plan on 21/01/2015 and waiting to review by Appraisal Council. It is expected to submit and approved in April 2015.

2 - 2 HHs requested other allowances

3 - 3 HHs request to support for cost ground elevation

4 - 6 HHs requested to adjust land location -

- PC of Lap Vo District rejected these HHs’s requests


48


Date of


VII BINH THANH COMMUNE -

1 - 17 HHs - These HHs requested to increase land price

June to October

2014

- CDHLF requested Southwest Information And Appraisal Corporation to survey land price. Result of land price survey did not change. PC of Lap Vo District issued document to inform these HHs

- 16 HHs - These HHs request to increase compensation for house and structure

- CDHLF requested these HHs to prepare estimation of construction cost for reviewing. Until now, it only has 1 HH provide document.

- 1 HHs - Request to support for small business - Proposal of allowance is 1 M vnd/ month x 6 months; proposal to be submitted to appraisal committee;

- 4 HHs - Land acquisition for land is outside of ROW - Rejected: No land acquisition outside of ROW for this phase

- 1 HH - Request to increase compensation rate for tree - CDHLF explained regulations of Dong Thap PPC on compensate rate for tree

- 1 HH - Request to compensate for 3 m along NH80 - CDHLF co-ordinated with Division of Natural Resources & Environment of Lap Vo District to measure the site. Through checking, it is known that land in 3 m along NH80 was compensated to this HH for NH80 expansion Project before. So HH’s request was rejected.

- 9 HHs - Request some allowances - CDHLF explained regulations of Dong Thap PPC on allowance levels

- 3 HHs - Compensation to be based on LURC - CDHLF explained for these HH that compensation for land based on actual measure;

- 4 HHs - Arrange more resettlement plots - Rejected


49

2. CAN THO CITY

No Name Address Amount Date Reasons why HH didn’t receive compensation

Situation up to 20/03/2015

1 Trần Văn Dũng Khu vực Thới Thạnh, phường Thới Thuận, quận Thốt Nốt.

928.936.314

10/6/2013

Complained about: location of land, land price

CLFD Can Tho answered his complaint by the written No 1096/TTPTQĐ -KTKD date 21/10/2013, said that his land was not any side to have contiguousness to Hau river. Thus, it was impossible to solve as his requirement. He handed over land for project, however, he has not still agreed to receive money.

2

Lam Thai Hoa and Dang Thi Bich Ngoc ( My Linh hotel) .

Long Thanh 2 RS 2013

HH claimed ownership on land in front of the road; Mr. Hoa received written answer of DPC. District People's Committee (DPC) disagreed with HH grievance.

HH brought his grievance to Can Tho city PC. At present, Can Tho City PC is reviewing the grievance

3 Mr. Luong Van Thoi

Vinh Trinh commune 26 April 2014

Additional compensation for land and structures

Additional compensation plan proposed in February 2015; Compensation expected by the end of April 2015;

The delay is mainly due to the special status of Mr. Luong Van Thoi (oversee Vietnamese) and a misunderstanding of procedures (Mr. Luong Van Thoi couldn’t make a complaint);


50

Annex 4 : List of HH who didn’t receive compensation and Reasons why they didn’t Receive Compensation

TT Name Compensation amount (VND)

Reasons why HH didn’t receive compensation Situation up to 01/04/2015

V MỸ AN HƯNG B COMMUNE

1 Nguyễn Văn Đực

674.734.800

- LURC name transferred to children’s name (need to change name in Compensation plan )

- Land acquisition area: 2.307,3m2 (LURC)

- Adjusting compensation plan ongoing

2 Lê Văn Đoàn 916.874.400 - LURC not changed and original property

documents lost - Land acquisition area: 3.259,4m2 (LURC)

- Under resolution by local authorities

3 Mai Thị Tươi 242.4744.00 - LURC put in guarantee in a Bank. Mistake for

the name in LURC - Adjustment in compensation plan ongoing

VI BÌNH THẠNH TRUNG COMMMUE

1 Hồ Văn Bân - Request to increase land and house rates

- HH agreed with the compensation plan and received compensation payment. However, this HH requested to support for ground elevation. CHFLD is preparing proposal

2 Nguyễn Văn Phước - Request to increase land and house rates

- HH agreed with the compensation plan and received compensation payment. However, this HH requested to support for ground elevation. CHFLD is preparing proposal

3 Huỳnh Văn Phước - Request to increase land rate - HH agreed with the compensation plan and received

compensation payment

4

Nguyễn Tấn Tài

- Request to increase land rate

- HH agreed with the compensation plan and received compensation payment

III BÌNH THÀNH COMMUNE

1

Nguyễn Trung Chánh

585.422.386

- Request compensation for land part along NH80

- Mistake in measurement

- Lap Vo District will organize meetings with AHs in August;

- Local authorities explained that land along NH80 has


51



- Compensation for sand leveling quantity for structure

-

been acquired according to a GoV Project and not under the CMDCP;

- Area based on LURC - Local authorities will review and verify leveling

quantity

4

Võ Văn Long

1.208.254.565

- Request increase of land residential rate to 1,500,000 đ/m2

- Request compensation of house following market rate

- Local authorities explained compensation policies; - HH maintained his complaint

6 Nguyễn Văn Rớt 336.375.457

- Request compensation for land part along NH80;

- Increase Land rate; - Compensate house following market rate in

2014 year ; - Request increase of allowance because not yet

receive plot in 45.000.000 vnd to 60.000.000 vnd

- Local authorities explained that land along NH80 has been acquired according to a GoV Project and not under the CMDCP;


7 Nguyễn Văn Sáu 303.217.590

- Request compensation for land part along NH80;

- Increase Land rate - Compensate house according to market rates; - Allowance for self-relocation from 45 to 60 M

vnd.


8 Nguyễn Văn Tuệ 417.733.472

- Compensate according to area in LURC ; - Compensate land rate following market rate

from 2,5 M vnd to 3 M vnd; - Compensate for house following market rate in

2014 year - Stabilization allowance for 24 months

- Local authorities to explain compensation policies

9 Trần Thị Thu Xuân 303.216.803 - Request compensation for land part along - Local authorities explained that land along NH80 has


52



NH80; - Request increase of land rate to

3.500.000đ/m2; - Request compensation for house according to

market price in 2014 year; - Request increase of relocation rate for electric

meter , allowance for renting house, stable of living in 24 months , allowance for relating house

been acquired according to a GoV Project and not under the CMDCP;

- Local authorities explained compensation policies - HH maintained his complaint

10 Cty CPLT&DV Quảng Nam 704.388.520 - Compensation value is lower compared with

loan value at Bank - Work with company and relative organization to

assess

11 Châu Thị Tuyết Nga 186.643.332 - Request arrangement of resettlement nearly

Lap Vo township - Local authorities to assess situation;

12 CTY TNHH XNK Quốc Hùng 1.957.841.850 - Request compensation for entire of area of

workshop - Local authorities to assess situation;

13 Đỗ Thị Kim 154.291.899

- Compensation value is lower loan value - Request to be receive compensation and

submit LURC after

- Local authorities to assess situation;


53

3. CAN THO CITY

No Name Address Amount Date Reasons why HH didn’t receive compensation

Situation up to 20/03/2015

1 Trần Văn Dũng Khu vực Thới Thạnh, phường Thới Thuận, quận Thốt Nốt.

928.936.314

10/6/2013

Complainted about: location of land, land price

CLFD Can Tho answered his complaint by the written No 1096/TTPTQĐ -KTKD date 21/10/2013, said that his land was not any side to have contiguousness to Hau river. Thus, it was impossible to solve as his requirement. He handed over land for project, however, he has not still agreed to receive money.

2 Nguyễn Thị Minh Nguyệt

Khu vực Thới Bình, phường Thới Thuận, quận Thốt Nốt.

122.595.009 2013

Has not contacted to receive compensation

CLFD Can Tho sent the second announcement for payment but this HH has not contacted to receive

3 Mai Anh Tuấn Xã Vĩnh Trinh, huyện Vĩnh Thạnh.

28.812.000 Has not contacted to receive compensation

CLFD Can Tho sent the second announcement for payment but this HH has not contacted to receive

4 Lê Thành Trung Xã Vĩnh Trinh, huyện Vĩnh Thạnh.

Not yet approved

5 Nguyễn Ngọc Mạnh Xã Vĩnh Trinh, huyện Vĩnh Thạnh.

68.166.000 Mr.Nguyen Ngoc Manh died, this HH is establishing procedures for inheritance


54

Annex 5: Obstacles on the ROW

No Commune Type of infrastructure

Location Owner of infrastructure Approval documents Status of relocation

1 An Bình

commune

Medium voltage poles

0km+300 - 0km+400: Đình Chung bridge

Electric unit of Cao Lãnh district

approved of relocation plan at Decision No 560/QĐ-UBND dated 20/06/2014

- Relocation carried out at 60%; - Poles foundation along Huong

Thao petrol station delayed (land not handed over due to grievances)

Fiber optic cable system along HW 30

0km +300 - 0km +340: NH 30

Telecommunication agency of Dong Thap province -Telecommunication agency of Cao lanh district - VTN2

Relocation plan approved in January 2015

- Land not yet handed over for relocation of infrastructure

Water supply pipe system in RoW

0km +300 - 0km +340: HW 30

Company of water drain and supply and urban environment of Dong Thap province

Relocation plan approved (decision No 1355/QĐ-UBND dated 27/12/2013)

- Land not yet handed over for relocation of infrastructure

220 kV transmission line

2 towers outside the RoW Southern Power Projects Management Board

- Decision on cutting temporarily power or moving the towers is under consideration by owner

2 Ward 3

High tension pole (medium and low

voltage)

2 sections: 0km +440 - 0km +520: Đình Chung bridge 1km+080 - 1km+320: Linh Sơn Bridge

Electricity unit of Cao Lanh city

Relocation plan approved (decision No 481/QĐ-UBND dated 28/05/2014)

- Relocation carried out at 90%

Electric Line of 110 kV 1Km+000 - 1km +120: Linh Sơn bridge

High Voltage branch of Dong Thap province

Relocation plan approved - Relocation to start; - Currently, 3 AHHs in Linh Son


55



2 towers to remove bridge section have not hand over land and receive compensation (Phan Trần Anh Huệ, Phan Thị Nguyệt, Phan Trần Anh C c)

Fiber optic cable system in ROW belong ward 3

Section 2 : 0 km+440 - 0km+520: Đình Chung bridge 1km +080 - 1km+320: Linh Sơn bridge

Telecommunication agency of Dong Thap province -Telecommunication agency of Cao Lanh city

Relocation plan approved - Relocation completed at 50%

3

Tịnh Thới commune

Low and medium voltage poles

section 6 : 2km+400 - 2km+680: Tịnh Thới bridge 3km+080 - 3km+120: D1 culvert 3km+760 - 3km+800: Rạch Miễu bridge 4km+080 - 4km+120: Cao Lãnh bridge 4km+480 - 4km+520: Cao Lãnh bridge

Electricity unit of Cao Lanh city

Relocation plan approved (decision No 485/QĐ-UBND-HC dated 29/05/2014)

- Relocation completed at 90%, waiting to cut power to connect

110 kV electric line 1km+120 - 1km+320 Linh Sơn bridge all having 2 locations of pole


Submitted bidding documents to Department of Planning & Invesment (DPI) of Dong Thap Province on 2/03/2015; Under review by DPI

- not yet relocate because waiting relocation plan approve after will relocate Currently . 3 AHHs in Linh Son bridge section have not hand over land and receive compensation (Phan Trần Anh Huệ, Phan Thị Nguyệt, Phan Trần Anh C c)


56



Fiber optic cable system in ROW belong Tinh Thoi commune

Section 4 : 1km+120 - 1km+320 Linh Sơn bridge 2km+400 - 2km+680: Tịnh Thới bridge 3km+760 - 3km+800: Rạch Miễu bridge

Telecommunication agency of Dong Thap

province -Telecommunication

agency of Cao lanh city

Prepare design documents; not yet submitted

- Relocation started in December/2014 ( section of Linh Son bridge and Tinh Thoi bridge). Relocated at 30%.

Water supply system

1km+120 - 1km+320 Linh Sơn bridge 2km+400 - 2km+680: Tịnh Thới bridge 3km+760 - 3km+800: Rạch Miễu bridge 4km+480 - 4km+520: Cao Lãnh bridge


Approved relocation plan at Decision No 1355/QĐ-UBND dated 27/12/2013

- Section : 4km+480 - 4km+520: just relocated for Cao Lãnh bridge

- End of December will carry out section :1km +120 - 1km+320 Linh Sơn bridge and 3km+760 - 3km+800: Rạch Miễu bridge

5 Mỹ An Hưng B

commune


section 3 : 8km+600 - 8km+700: Thầy Lâm canal 10km+100 - 10km+300: Mương Lớn bridge 11km +400 - 11km+500: Đất Sét bridge

19/12/2014 through compensation council and waiting decision of approval

- Relocation carried out at 70% - Completion expected by end

of April

6

Bình Thạnh Trung

commune

High tension pole (medium and low voltage)

section 5 : 15 km +700 - 15km+900: Tân Bình bridge 16km+900 - 17km+000: Xáng Nhỏ canal 17km+300 - 17km+400: 2/9 canal 17km+700 - 17km+800: Rạch

Plan submitted on 15/12/2014. To be reviewed Council on 25/12/2014

- Relocation completed at 70%


57



Vượt ditch 18km+500 - 18km+700: residential area of Lấp Vò river

7 Bình

Thành commune


section 3 : 18km+800 - 18km+900: HW 80 19 km +700 - 19km +800: Lấp Vò ditch 20 km+100 - 20km +300: Phước Long pagoda

Relocation plan to be submitted on 25/12/2014

- Relocation expected by May 2015;

- Will start preparation of ground to speed-up process

Electric system of 110 kV

18km +900 - 19km+000 pass over Lấp Vò bridge and 2 interchanges (total : 6 poles )


Relocation plan approved - Under removal;

Telecommunication cables in Binh Tanh commune

18km+800 - 18km+900: HW80 19km+700 - 19km+800: Lấp Vò ditch

Viễn thông Đồng Tháp - Viễn thông Lấp Vò -

VTN2 Relocation plan approved - Under removal;

Water supply pipes 18km+800 - 18km+900: HW 80 19km+700 - 19km+800: Lấp Vò ditch


approved Relocation plan at Decision No 523/QĐ-UBND dated 09/06/2014

- Under removal;;

8 Định An

commune Medium voltage poles

section 3 : 22km+000 - 22km+100: Ông Hành Ditch 22km+800 - 22km+900: Am ditch 23km +200 - 23km+300: Xếp Cụt ditch

Submitted Relocation plan in 15/12/2014, plan to 25/12/2014 will through council

- Completion carried out at 70%.


58



Telecommunication cables system

23km+200 - 23km+300: Xếp Cụt small Ditch

Telecommunication agency of Dong Thap

province -Telecommunication unit

of Lap Vo district

Relocation plan approved - Completion carried out at

70%.

Water supply pipe system

22km+800 - 22km+900: Mương Am mall ditch 23 km+200 - 23km+300: Xếp Cụt ditch

Agricultural cooper native of Dinh An No 2

Relocation plan approved - Completion carried out at

70%.


59

Annex 6: Agreed Steps to Implement the IRP in Can Tho City

Steps cover the first year of implementation until April 2016

1. Preparation Phase (26 March to 10 April)

Activities Responsibility Date

- Meeting of SC and WG with DDIS/CIPM to start implementation and to identify all steps

SC & WG 26 March 2015

- Prepare and sign contract between CIPM & CLFD CIPM/CLFD Once possibility to open account in commercial bank confirmed by ADB

- CLFD to open imprest account - Note CLFD wants to open an account at the

Viettin; not at the state treasury;.

CLFD/Can Tho City PC

Completed at Viettin Bank (ADB to confirm if

possible)

- Sub-contracts between CLFD and other agencies (DOLISA, WU, DARD, FU)

CLFD DOLISA, WU, DARD, FU

6 April 2015

- Advance payment to CLFD in accordance with agreed contracts;

CIPM Before end of April 2015

- In collaboration with CIPM/DDIS, complete organization arrangements and task assignment for each Member of SC and WG;

DDIS/CIPM, SC/WG

26 March to 10 April

- Office renting and buying equipment; SC 15 April 2015

- Preparation of timesheet to be filled every month by all members of SC & WG (to be prepared by CIPM/DDIS);

CIPM/DDIS 08/04/2015

2. Confirmation of Choices and Planning (30 March to 30 April 2015)

Activities Participants Date

- Confirmation of choices of AHs - SC will post the list of HH with their choice at

the People’s Committee office of Thoi Thuan ward and Vinh Trinh commune.

- HH will be informed that they will have 3 weeks to respond after the posting to make a final choice;

- HH will be informed through: radio announcement; notice to households through

SC & WG Prior to 14 April

2015


60

by the village head (or WU at village level);

- Identify costs of inputs in the market (i.e. animals plant) based on Vietnamese regulation;

- Get list of prices of equipment materials from PPC (i.e. armchairs, dryer etc.);

- Regarding cow, a specific survey will be conducted in 3 different areas (including Ben Tre and An Giang provinces) Mr. Man and Mr. Truong and representatives of HH and DDIS (car from DDIS); following this survey SC will make a choice on where to buy cows.

SC & WG with

representatives of

AHs and DDIS

Mid April 2015

- Meet every HH to determine: - For HH who choose agriculture activities: use

of remaining support amount (i.e. facilities for animal, industrial food etc.)

- For HH who choose training or small business: use of remaining support amount (i.e. type of equipment for small business etc.)

- Check how the HH plan to implement the activity (i.e. sufficient area, adequate location & facilities etc.) and propose adjustment if needed

- HH will sign a form to confirm choice (see Annex 1)

WG

- AEC: 52 AH

- DOLISA: 43 HH

- WU: 42 HH

20 -25 April 2015

- Preparation of training course - Agriculture (Agriculture extension Center) - Vocational Training (DOLISA, Vocational

Training Center) - Small Business (Women Union) Organization of class, selection of trainer;

SC & WG

20-25 April 2015

- Building group of interest for agriculture and small business activities` - These groups of interest will gather, at the

village level, participants which implement the same activity (i.e. cow raising, pig breeding etc.) or HH involved in small business.

- Each group of interest will be led by an experienced member. The purpose of these groups is to provide peer support, share experience, success and to improve skills.

- Women’s Union will be in charge to establish such groups for small business and the AEC the one for agriculture activities

WG support from

CIPM/DDIS

End of May 2015


61

3. Start of Implementation May and June 2015


- Agriculture activities - i) Field visit to cow farming models; - ii) Training on agriculture activities - iii) Bring AHs to buy cow at location identified

in survey; - iv) Handover animal/equipment to HH; Sign

attached form (Annex 2);

Agriculture Ext. Center WG

SC/WG/CIPM/DDIS

10 May 2015

End of May 2015

Beginning of June

End of June 2015

- Small business - Training on small business - Buying inputs for small business - Handover equipment to HH; Sign attached form

(Annex 2);

WU (to be confirmed)

WG

SC/WG/CIPM/DDIS

Beginning of May

4 to 15 May 2015

End of May

- Vocational training - Start training

Vocational Training

Center

Starting Mid-May

2015

4. Follow-up Phase & Reporting (starting July 2015)


- Prepare monitoring plan (content of monitoring, reporting etc.)

WG with assistance

from CIPM#DDIS

End of June 2015

- Follow up: Every month for every HH for the first year;

-

WG When HH received

inputs (expected

J u l y 2 0 1 5 )

- Prepare monthly report on activities conducted (i.e. number of activities implemented, type of activities difficulties met if any, capacity of the HH to implement activity, additional training needed, disbursement conducted etc.).

Head of WG:

- AEC - VTC - WU

1st report at the end

of April

- Prepare quarterly report SC 1st report at the end

of June

- Meeting with CIPM/DDIS every 2 months for the first year (12 meetings); every 3 months the second year (8 meetings) with CIPM/DDIS for review and discuss issues

SC & WG CIPM/DDIS 1st at the end of

May

- Organize 1 workshop at the end of the first year in Thoi Thuan to assess difficulties and problems met during the first year; to share information and lessons learnt; and to identify any additional assistance needed to meet project objectives;

DDIS with WG Expected May June

2016

- Prepare working plan for the second year SC & WG CIPM/DDIS After workshop


62

Annex 7: Disclosure of Lists pf HH Entitled to the IRP in Dong Thap Province

Disclosure of list of AH participating to the IRP with support level and activity chosen in Binh

Thanh Trung PC commune ‘s office on 10 April 2015

Disclosure of list of AH participating to the IRP with support level and activity chosen in Ward 3

and Tinh Thoi commune PC ‘s office on 10 April 2015


63

Direct meeting with HH for confirmation of choices; Women’s Union and DDIS discussed with

participants on 14 April

Meeting was chaired by Women’s Union who

are responsible for small business component


64

Annex 8: Planning of Resettlement and Social Activities from April to June 2015

APRIL MAY JUNE

RESETTLEMENT

- Preparation/Review documents

- - Finalization of report on the review of assistance for HH affected by the reduction of the construction yards at Tan My and Tinh Thoi commune;

- Update costs for land acquisition within the loops of the interchanges and prepare alternatives.

- Supervision activities

- Continuous; Resettlement specialists on site;

- Continuous; Resettlement specialists on site

- Continuous; Resettlement specialists on site

SOCIAL ACTION PLAN - -

- Employment of

local people during

construction

- Assist contractors for contract 1C and 2A, 2 B 2C to hire local people;

- Assess employment of women

- -

- Involvement of WU - Assist relocated women in RS; - -

- Information Campaign at Ferry Site

- Preparation of leaflet to distribute to shopkeepers and posting of information

- -

- Capacity building - Second round of capacity building in gender mainstreaming -

INCOME RESTORATION PROGRAM

- IRP implementation - Assist SC & WG to start IRP implementation in Can Tho City (Thoi Thuan ward and Vinh Trinh commune)

- Assist SC & WG to start IRP implementation in Dong Thap Province for Stage 1 (Dinh An and Tinh Thoi communes)

- Follow-up implementation of IRP;

- QUARTERLY REPORT - -

- - - Preparation of the 7th Quarterly

Report