11
Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Exhibit # - NRC000068-MA-BD01 Docket # - 05200011 Identified: 03/24/2009 Admitted: Withdrawn: Rejected: Stricken: 03/24/2009

Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Vog

tle E

SP M

anda

tory

Hea

ring

Mar

ch 2

3-25

, 200

9

NR

C S

taff

Pre

sent

atio

n To

pic

#10

Prop

osed

Per

mit

Con

ditio

ns

NR

C00

0068

Nuclear Regulatory CommissionExhibit # - NRC000068-MA-BD01Docket # - 05200011Identified: 03/24/2009

Admitted: Withdrawn: Rejected: Stricken: 03/24/2009

Page 2: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Pres

ente

r:

Chr

istia

n A

ragu

asPr

ojec

t Man

ager

NR

O/D

NR

L/N

WE1

Page 3: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Per

mit

Con

ditio

nsP

erm

it C

ondi

tions

Def

initi

onD

efin

ition

::

The

Com

mis

sion

's re

gula

tions

at 1

0 C

FR 5

2.24

requ

ire a

n E

SP

to s

The

Com

mis

sion

's re

gula

tions

at 1

0 C

FR 5

2.24

requ

ire a

n E

SP

to s

peci

fy

peci

fy

any

term

s an

d co

nditi

ons

of th

e E

SP

the

Com

mis

sion

dee

ms

appr

opr

any

term

s an

d co

nditi

ons

of th

e E

SP

the

Com

mis

sion

dee

ms

appr

opr ia

te.

iate

. A

per

mit

cond

ition

is n

ot n

eede

d w

hen

an e

xist

ing

NR

C re

gula

tion

A p

erm

it co

nditi

on is

not

nee

ded

whe

n an

exi

stin

g N

RC

regu

latio

nre

quire

s re

quire

s a

futu

re re

gula

tory

revi

ew o

f a m

atte

r to

ensu

re a

dequ

ate

safe

tya

futu

re re

gula

tory

revi

ew o

f a m

atte

r to

ensu

re a

dequ

ate

safe

tydu

ring

durin

g de

sign

, con

stru

ctio

n, o

r ins

pect

ion

activ

ities

for a

new

pla

nt.

desi

gn, c

onst

ruct

ion,

or i

nspe

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es fo

r a n

ew p

lant

.

3

Page 4: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Per

mit

Con

ditio

nsP

erm

it C

ondi

tions

Exa

mpl

es o

f whe

n to

use

a P

erm

it C

ondi

tion

Exa

mpl

es o

f whe

n to

use

a P

erm

it C

ondi

tion ::

The

staf

fTh

e st

aff ’’ s

eva

luat

ion

in th

e S

ER

rest

s on

an

assu

mpt

ion

that

is n

ot

s ev

alua

tion

in th

e S

ER

rest

s on

an

assu

mpt

ion

that

is n

ot

curre

ntly

sup

porte

d, a

nd w

hich

is p

ract

icab

le to

sup

port

only

af

curre

ntly

sup

porte

d, a

nd w

hich

is p

ract

icab

le to

sup

port

only

af te

r ES

P

ter E

SP

is

suan

ce (e

.g.,

subs

urfa

ce c

ondi

tion

disc

over

ed u

pon

exca

vatio

n is

suan

ce (e

.g.,

subs

urfa

ce c

ondi

tion

disc

over

ed u

pon

exca

vatio

n fo

r fo

r fo

unda

tion

cons

truct

ion)

foun

datio

n co

nstru

ctio

n)A

site

phy

sica

l attr

ibut

e is

not

acc

epta

ble

for t

he d

esig

n of

sy

A s

ite p

hysi

cal a

ttrib

ute

is n

ot a

ccep

tabl

e fo

r the

des

ign

of s

y ste

ms,

st

ems,

st

ruct

ures

, and

com

pone

nts

(SS

Cs)

impo

rtant

to s

afet

y (s

uch

a co

stru

ctur

es, a

nd c

ompo

nent

s (S

SC

s) im

porta

nt to

saf

ety

(suc

h a

cond

ition

nd

ition

m

ay c

all f

or a

ctio

n to

rem

edy

the

defic

ienc

y. e

.g.,

crac

ked

or w

may

cal

l for

act

ion

to re

med

y th

e de

ficie

ncy.

e.g

., cr

acke

d or

wea

ther

ed

eath

ered

ro

ck th

at is

not

acc

epta

ble

for b

earin

g fo

unda

tion

load

s is

repl

rock

that

is n

ot a

ccep

tabl

e fo

r bea

ring

foun

datio

n lo

ads

is re

plac

ed o

r ac

ed o

r fil

led

with

lean

con

cret

e or

oth

erw

ise

treat

ed s

o as

to b

e ac

cep

fille

d w

ith le

an c

oncr

ete

or o

ther

wis

e tre

ated

so

as to

be

acce

p tab

le)

tabl

e)Th

e st

aff

The

staf

f ’’ s e

valu

atio

n de

pend

s on

a fu

ture

act

(e.g

., a

stat

e re

gula

tory

s

eval

uatio

n de

pend

s on

a fu

ture

act

(e.g

., a

stat

e re

gula

tory

ap

prov

al m

ay b

e ca

lled

for)

appr

oval

may

be

calle

d fo

r)

4

Page 5: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Per

mit

Con

ditio

nsP

erm

it C

ondi

tions

Vog

tle E

SP

FS

ER

Per

mit

Con

ditio

nsV

ogtle

ES

P F

SE

R P

erm

it C

ondi

tions

PC

1: T

he E

SP

hol

der s

hall

eith

er re

mov

e an

d re

plac

e, o

r sha

ll P

C 1

: The

ES

P h

olde

r sha

ll ei

ther

rem

ove

and

repl

ace,

or s

hall

impr

ove,

the

soils

dire

ctly

abo

ve th

e B

lue

Blu

ff M

arl f

or s

oils

im

prov

e, th

e so

ils d

irect

ly a

bove

the

Blu

e B

luff

Mar

l for

soi

ls

unde

r or a

djac

ent t

o S

eism

ic C

ateg

ory

1 st

ruct

ures

, to

elim

inat

eun

der o

r adj

acen

t to

Sei

smic

Cat

egor

y 1

stru

ctur

es, t

o el

imin

ate

any

lique

fact

ion

pote

ntia

l.an

y liq

uefa

ctio

n po

tent

ial.

The

ES

P a

pplic

atio

n st

ates

that

por

tions

of t

he s

oil a

bove

the

BTh

e E

SP

app

licat

ion

stat

es th

at p

ortio

ns o

f the

soi

l abo

ve th

e B

lue

lue

Blu

ff M

arl a

re s

usce

ptib

le to

liqu

efac

tion.

In

orde

r to

supp

ort

Blu

ff M

arl a

re s

usce

ptib

le to

liqu

efac

tion.

In

orde

r to

supp

ort t

he

the

appl

ican

tap

plic

ant ’’ s

pro

pose

d si

te c

hara

cter

istic

that

ther

e is

no

lique

fact

ion

s pr

opos

ed s

ite c

hara

cter

istic

that

ther

e is

no

lique

fact

ion

pote

ntia

l at t

he V

EG

P E

SP

site

, the

app

lican

t sta

ted

that

it w

oupo

tent

ial a

t the

VE

GP

ES

P s

ite, t

he a

pplic

ant s

tate

d th

at it

wou

ld

ld

need

to re

mov

e th

e so

il di

rect

ly a

bove

the

Blu

e B

luff

Mar

l.

need

to re

mov

e th

e so

il di

rect

ly a

bove

the

Blu

e B

luff

Mar

l.

Ther

efor

e th

e st

aff i

s pr

opos

ing

a pe

rmit

cond

ition

to e

nsur

e th

Ther

efor

e th

e st

aff i

s pr

opos

ing

a pe

rmit

cond

ition

to e

nsur

e th

is

is

futu

re a

ct o

ccur

s.fu

ture

act

occ

urs.

5

Page 6: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Per

mit

Con

ditio

nsP

erm

it C

ondi

tions

PC

2 a

nd 3

: An

appl

ican

t for

a c

ombi

ned

licen

se (C

OL)

P

C 2

and

3: A

n ap

plic

ant f

or a

com

bine

d lic

ense

(CO

L)

refe

renc

ing

this

ear

ly s

ite p

erm

it sh

all r

evis

e th

e E

ALs

for b

otre

fere

ncin

g th

is e

arly

site

per

mit

shal

l rev

ise

the

EA

Ls fo

r bot

h h U

nits

3 a

nd 4

to re

flect

the

final

revi

sion

of N

EI 0

7U

nits

3 a

nd 4

to re

flect

the

final

revi

sion

of N

EI 0

7 --01

.01

.Th

e ap

plic

ant s

ubm

itted

its

EA

Ls fo

r Uni

ts 3

and

4 b

ased

on

The

appl

ican

t sub

mitt

ed it

s E

ALs

for U

nits

3 a

nd 4

bas

ed o

n gu

idel

ines

in N

EI 0

7gu

idel

ines

in N

EI 0

7 --01

, 01

, ““M

etho

dolo

gy fo

r Dev

elop

men

t of

Met

hodo

logy

for D

evel

opm

ent o

f E

mer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

(EA

Ls),

Adv

ance

d P

assi

ve L

ight

Wat

er

Em

erge

ncy

Act

ion

Leve

ls (E

ALs

), A

dvan

ced

Pas

sive

Lig

ht W

ater

R

eact

ors.

Rea

ctor

s.”” N

EI 0

7N

EI 0

7 --01

pro

pose

s E

AL

guid

elin

es fo

r pas

sive

pla

nt

01 p

ropo

ses

EA

L gu

idel

ines

for p

assi

ve p

lant

de

sign

s, in

clud

ing

the

AP

1000

. T

he S

taff

is re

view

ing

NE

I 07

desi

gns,

incl

udin

g th

e A

P10

00.

The

Sta

ff is

revi

ewin

g N

EI 0

7 --01

, 01

, an

d w

hile

cha

nges

to N

EI 0

7an

d w

hile

cha

nges

to N

EI 0

7 --01

may

resu

lt fro

m th

is re

view

, the

01

may

resu

lt fro

m th

is re

view

, the

S

taff

antic

ipat

es th

at it

will

endo

rse

the

final

ver

sion

of t

he

Sta

ff an

ticip

ates

that

it w

ill en

dors

e th

e fin

al v

ersi

on o

f the

NE

I 07

NE

I 07 --

01 g

uide

lines

in R

G 1

.101

. Th

e ap

plic

ant i

ndic

ated

its

inte

ntio

01 g

uide

lines

in R

G 1

.101

. Th

e ap

plic

ant i

ndic

ated

its

inte

ntio

n to

n

to

revi

se th

e E

ALs

as

NE

I 07

revi

se th

e E

ALs

as

NE

I 07 --

01 is

revi

sed.

Per

mit

Con

ditio

ns 2

and

3

01 is

revi

sed.

Per

mit

Con

ditio

ns 2

and

3

ther

efor

e re

quire

that

a C

OL

appl

ican

t ref

eren

cing

this

ES

P u

pda

ther

efor

e re

quire

that

a C

OL

appl

ican

t ref

eren

cing

this

ES

P u

pda t

e te

the

EA

Ls u

sing

the

final

revi

sion

of t

he E

AL

guid

elin

es.

the

EA

Ls u

sing

the

final

revi

sion

of t

he E

AL

guid

elin

es.

6

Page 7: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Per

mit

Con

ditio

nsP

erm

it C

ondi

tions

PC

4 a

nd 5

: A

n ap

plic

ant f

or a

com

bine

d lic

ense

(CO

L)

PC

4 a

nd 5

: A

n ap

plic

ant f

or a

com

bine

d lic

ense

(CO

L)

refe

renc

ing

this

ear

ly s

ite p

erm

it sh

all s

ubm

it a

fully

dev

elop

ere

fere

ncin

g th

is e

arly

site

per

mit

shal

l sub

mit

a fu

lly d

evel

ope d

d E

AL

sche

me

for b

oth

Uni

ts 3

and

4 th

at re

flect

s th

e co

mpl

eted

E

AL

sche

me

for b

oth

Uni

ts 3

and

4 th

at re

flect

s th

e co

mpl

eted

A

P10

00 d

esig

n de

tails

, sub

ject

to a

llow

able

ITA

AC

.A

P10

00 d

esig

n de

tails

, sub

ject

to a

llow

able

ITA

AC

.S

ince

EA

Ls re

ly o

n sp

ecifi

c de

sign

det

ails

that

are

una

vaila

ble

Sin

ce E

ALs

rely

on

spec

ific

desi

gn d

etai

ls th

at a

re u

nava

ilabl

e at

at

th

e E

SP

sta

ge, t

hese

per

mit

cond

ition

s re

quire

that

the

appl

ican

the

ES

P s

tage

, the

se p

erm

it co

nditi

ons

requ

ire th

at th

e ap

plic

antt ’’ s

s E

AL

sche

me

be c

onsi

sten

t with

the

final

AP

1000

cer

tifie

d de

sign

E

AL

sche

me

be c

onsi

sten

t with

the

final

AP

1000

cer

tifie

d de

sign

th

at is

refe

renc

ed in

any

CO

L ap

plic

atio

n re

fere

ncin

g th

e E

SP

.th

at is

refe

renc

ed in

any

CO

L ap

plic

atio

n re

fere

ncin

g th

e E

SP

.

7

Page 8: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Per

mit

Con

ditio

nsP

erm

it C

ondi

tions

PC

6 a

nd 7

: A

n ap

plic

ant f

or a

com

bine

d lic

ense

(CO

L)

PC

6 a

nd 7

: A

n ap

plic

ant f

or a

com

bine

d lic

ense

(CO

L)

refe

renc

ing

this

ear

ly s

ite p

erm

it sh

all c

ompl

ete

a fu

lly d

evel

ore

fere

ncin

g th

is e

arly

site

per

mit

shal

l com

plet

e a

fully

dev

elo p

ed

ped

set o

f EA

Ls fo

r bot

h U

nits

3 a

nd 4

, whi

ch a

re b

ased

on

inse

t of E

ALs

for b

oth

Uni

ts 3

and

4, w

hich

are

bas

ed o

n in

-- pla

nt

plan

t co

nditi

ons

and

inst

rum

enta

tion,

incl

udin

g on

site

and

offs

ite

cond

ition

s an

d in

stru

men

tatio

n, in

clud

ing

onsi

te a

nd o

ffsite

m

onito

ring,

and

whi

ch h

ave

been

dis

cuss

ed a

nd a

gree

d on

by

mon

itorin

g, a

nd w

hich

hav

e be

en d

iscu

ssed

and

agr

eed

on b

y th

e ap

plic

ant o

r lic

ense

e an

d S

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

enta

l th

e ap

plic

ant o

r lic

ense

e an

d S

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

enta

l au

thor

ities

, and

sha

ll in

clud

e th

e fu

ll se

t of E

ALs

in th

e C

OL

auth

oriti

es, a

nd s

hall

incl

ude

the

full

set o

f EA

Ls in

the

CO

L ap

plic

atio

n. I

f the

EA

Ls a

re n

ot fu

lly d

evel

oped

, the

CO

L ap

plic

atio

n. I

f the

EA

Ls a

re n

ot fu

lly d

evel

oped

, the

CO

L ap

plic

atio

n sh

all c

onta

in a

ppro

pria

te IT

AA

C fo

r the

fully

ap

plic

atio

n sh

all c

onta

in a

ppro

pria

te IT

AA

C fo

r the

fully

de

velo

ped

set o

f EA

Ls fo

r bot

h U

nits

3 a

nd 4

.de

velo

ped

set o

f EA

Ls fo

r bot

h U

nits

3 a

nd 4

.Th

e pu

rpos

e of

thes

e co

nditi

ons

is to

ens

ure

that

the

EA

L sc

hem

eTh

e pu

rpos

e of

thes

e co

nditi

ons

is to

ens

ure

that

the

EA

L sc

hem

esu

bmitt

ed m

eets

the

requ

irem

ents

of 1

0 C

FR 5

0.47

and

10

CFR

su

bmitt

ed m

eets

the

requ

irem

ents

of 1

0 C

FR 5

0.47

and

10

CFR

P

art 5

0 A

ppen

dix

E.

Par

t 50

App

endi

x E

.

8

Page 9: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Per

mit

Con

ditio

nsP

erm

it C

ondi

tions

PC

8:

An

appl

ican

t for

a c

ombi

ned

licen

se (C

OL)

refe

renc

ing

PC

8:

An

appl

ican

t for

a c

ombi

ned

licen

se (C

OL)

refe

renc

ing

this

ear

ly s

ite p

erm

it sh

all r

esol

ve th

e di

ffere

nce

betw

een

the

this

ear

ly s

ite p

erm

it sh

all r

esol

ve th

e di

ffere

nce

betw

een

the

VE

GP

Uni

ts 3

and

4 c

omm

on T

echn

ical

Sup

port

Cen

ter (

TSC

), V

EG

P U

nits

3 a

nd 4

com

mon

Tec

hnic

al S

uppo

rt C

ente

r (TS

C),

and

the

TSC

loca

tion

spec

ified

in th

e A

P10

00 c

ertif

ied

desi

gn.

and

the

TSC

loca

tion

spec

ified

in th

e A

P10

00 c

ertif

ied

desi

gn.

In th

e E

SP

app

licat

ion,

the

appl

ican

t has

pro

pose

d a

com

mon

TS

C

In th

e E

SP

app

licat

ion,

the

appl

ican

t has

pro

pose

d a

com

mon

TS

C

for V

EG

P U

nits

3 a

nd 4

. Th

e st

aff h

as re

view

ed a

nd a

ppro

ved

the

for V

EG

P U

nits

3 a

nd 4

. Th

e st

aff h

as re

view

ed a

nd a

ppro

ved

the

com

mon

TS

C fo

r the

VE

GP

site

, but

reco

gniz

es th

at th

e A

P10

00

com

mon

TS

C fo

r the

VE

GP

site

, but

reco

gniz

es th

at th

e A

P10

00

certi

fied

desi

gn h

as a

sep

arat

e TS

C fo

r eac

h re

acto

r and

that

ce

rtifie

d de

sign

has

a s

epar

ate

TSC

for e

ach

reac

tor a

nd th

at

desi

gn a

men

dmen

ts to

the

AP

1000

und

er c

onsi

dera

tion

coul

d af

fect

desi

gn a

men

dmen

ts to

the

AP

1000

und

er c

onsi

dera

tion

coul

d af

fect

the

basi

s fo

r the

Sta

ffth

e ba

sis

for t

he S

taff ’’

s E

SP

det

erm

inat

ion.

The

refo

re a

CO

L s

ES

P d

eter

min

atio

n. T

here

fore

a C

OL

appl

ican

t ref

eren

cing

this

ES

P a

nd th

e A

P10

00 c

ertif

ied

desi

gn w

appl

ican

t ref

eren

cing

this

ES

P a

nd th

e A

P10

00 c

ertif

ied

desi

gn w

ill

ill

need

to a

ddre

ss th

is d

iffer

ence

. ne

ed to

add

ress

this

diff

eren

ce.

9

Page 10: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068

Per

mit

Con

ditio

nsP

erm

it C

ondi

tions

PC

9:

If a

CO

L or

CP

app

licat

ion

refe

renc

ing

this

ES

P a

lso

PC

9:

If a

CO

L or

CP

app

licat

ion

refe

renc

ing

this

ES

P a

lso

refe

renc

es a

cer

tifie

d de

sign

, the

CO

L or

CP

app

lican

t may

re

fere

nces

a c

ertif

ied

desi

gn, t

he C

OL

or C

P a

pplic

ant m

ay

dem

onst

rate

com

plia

nce

with

the

radi

olog

ical

con

sequ

ence

de

mon

stra

te c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith th

e ra

diol

ogic

al c

onse

quen

ce

eval

uatio

n fa

ctor

s in

10

CFR

52.

79(a

)(1)

or 1

0 C

FR 5

0.34

(a)(

1),

eval

uatio

n fa

ctor

s in

10

CFR

52.

79(a

)(1)

or 1

0 C

FR 5

0.34

(a)(

1),

resp

ectiv

ely,

by

dem

onst

ratin

g th

at th

e si

tere

spec

tivel

y, b

y de

mon

stra

ting

that

the

site

-- spe

cific

sp

ecifi

c χχ /

Q v

alue

s /Q

val

ues

dete

rmin

ed in

the

ES

P fa

ll w

ithin

thos

e ev

alua

ted

in th

e ap

prov

ade

term

ined

in th

e E

SP

fall

with

in th

ose

eval

uate

d in

the

appr

ova l

l of

the

refe

renc

ed c

ertif

ied

desi

gn.

How

ever

, if a

CO

L or

CP

of

the

refe

renc

ed c

ertif

ied

desi

gn.

How

ever

, if a

CO

L or

CP

re

fere

ncin

g th

is E

SP

doe

s no

t ref

eren

ce a

cer

tifie

d de

sign

, the

re

fere

ncin

g th

is E

SP

doe

s no

t ref

eren

ce a

cer

tifie

d de

sign

, the

ap

plic

ant w

ould

stil

l nee

d to

dem

onst

rate

that

its

sour

ce te

rm i

appl

ican

t wou

ld s

till n

eed

to d

emon

stra

te th

at it

s so

urce

term

i s s

boun

ded

by th

e so

urce

term

val

ues

incl

uded

in th

e E

SP

.bo

unde

d by

the

sour

ce te

rm v

alue

s in

clud

ed in

the

ES

P.

The

purp

ose

of th

is c

ondi

tion

is to

allo

w a

CO

L ap

plic

ant

The

purp

ose

of th

is c

ondi

tion

is to

allo

w a

CO

L ap

plic

ant

refe

renc

ing

the

ES

P a

nd a

cer

tifie

d de

sign

to re

ly o

n th

e ra

diol

refe

renc

ing

the

ES

P a

nd a

cer

tifie

d de

sign

to re

ly o

n th

e ra

diol

ogic

al

ogic

al

cons

eque

nce

eval

uatio

n ap

prov

ed in

the

certi

fied

desi

gn if

the

cons

eque

nce

eval

uatio

n ap

prov

ed in

the

certi

fied

desi

gn if

the

desi

gn c

ertif

icat

ion

desi

gn c

ertif

icat

ion χχ /

Q v

alue

s ar

e bo

undi

ng, b

ut to

requ

ire a

CO

L /Q

val

ues

are

boun

ding

, but

to re

quire

a C

OL

appl

ican

t tha

t ref

eren

ces

a cu

stom

des

ign

to d

emon

stra

te th

at th

appl

ican

t tha

t ref

eren

ces

a cu

stom

des

ign

to d

emon

stra

te th

at th

e e so

urce

term

val

ues

for t

he c

usto

m d

esig

n ar

e bo

unde

d by

thos

e so

urce

term

val

ues

for t

he c

usto

m d

esig

n ar

e bo

unde

d by

thos

e in

clud

ed in

the

ES

P.

incl

uded

in th

e E

SP

.

10

Page 11: Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing NRC Staff Presentation Topic ... · Vogtle ESP Mandatory Hearing March 23-25, 2009 NRC Staff Presentation Topic #10 Proposed Permit Conditions NRC000068