Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1
• April 15—May 3,Facility: Vogtle Units 1 & 2 Date of Examination: 2013
NRCExaminations Developed by:
Writte I Operating Test Written / Operating Test
ChiefTargetDate* Task Description (Reference) Examiner s
Initials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C. 1 .a; C.2.a and b) RSB
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) RSB
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) RSB
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) RSB
[-901 [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)j RSB
{-75) 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l’s, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as RSB
applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility RSBlicensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}
{ -45) 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, asapplicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, RSBES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-40l-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g andh; C.3.d)
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398’s) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) RSB
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202) RSB
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review RSB(C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) RSB
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor RSB(C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirmqualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent RSB
(C.2.i;_Attachment 4;_ES-202,_C.2.e;_ES-204)
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee RSB(C.3.k)
-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to RSBNRC examiners (C.3.i)
* Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination dateidentified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on acase-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.[Applies only], {Does not apply) to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2
Facility: Date of Examination:
InitialsItem Task Description —
a b* c#
1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.w —
R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance withI Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled.
T —
T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.—
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. 7
2. a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required numberof normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications,
S and major transients.
M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected numberU and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation scheduleL without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using /7A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated ‘)
T from the applicants’ audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. — — —
c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative.
and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D. “\
3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2:(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks
W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the formI (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form ,
T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants’ audit test(s) ‘‘R (9 \(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria
on the form.
b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form -
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations — —
c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix t1 ‘jof applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. U ‘
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered )(in the appropriate exam sections.
G 7rTE b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. ‘ t.UJNE c. Ensure that KJA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.AL e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.__Assess_whether_the_exam_fits_the_appropriate_job_level_(RO_or_SRO).
Printed ‘Iame/Sigp tu e Datea. Author fr’€r4-I jtniM
b. Facility Reviewer (*) th’ )4/jj /c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 1J44/-O i’ ‘Y i—f
-
d. NRC Supervisor AL cL -, -( ji’-
Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column “c’; chief examiner concurrence required.* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
I cI
Th
I.
2.1)t,r#
(,3.C1
1’)--
4errfjc
,14.
18
cJi,
LJa
/kL
J5.
L’
f(,A
.L3
6..
oA
s..
7./1(’
/5’q
-8.9.
—10.
d)
S;.6
itii.M
76j7’J?
12. 4y
,%4
,uS
13.Crst
r’
4efr
14.cM
15._4;v
t-fot-ie
-.rN
OT
ES:
o;
c;S
Si
IchaLo
qP
Oes
-rUD
..Wi.
Ly)
OP
Lfr
oP
s1cr
-
SS/.i
ZO
r/S
ci4
.ti‘l
c4f.j
jI-/-/3
I(I
-+
fl43
j,,1—
u•-/L
I—ui_i
-h
-i3
•fc—I3
_ -
Form
ES
-201-3
_____
Vo6reeE
S-201
1(6-18A
CE
xamination
Security
Agreem
ent
1.P
re-Exam
ination
Iacknowledge
thatIhave
acquiredspecialized
knowledge
aboutthe
NR
Clicensing
examinations
scheduledfor
thew
eek(s)of
__
___
_____
_
asof
thedate
ofm
ysignature.
Iagreethat
Iwill
notknow
inglydivulge
anyinform
ationabout
these
examinations
toany
personsw
hohave
notbeen
authorizedby
theN
RC
chiefexam
iner.Iunderstand
thatIam
nottoinstruct,
evaluate,or
provideperform
ancefeedback
tothose
applicantsscheduled
tobe
administered
these
licensingexam
inationsfrom
thisdate
untilcom
pletionof
examination
administration,
exceptas
specificallynoted
belowand
authorizedby
theN
RC
(e.g.,acting
asa
simulator
boothoperator
orcom
municator
isacceptable
iftheindividual
doesnot
selectthe
trainingcontent
orprovide
director
indirectfeedback).
Furtherm
ore,Iam
aware
ofthe
physicalsecurity
measures
andrequirem
ents(as
documented
inthe
facilitylicensee’s
procedures)and
understandthat
violationof
theconditions
ofthisagreem
entm
ayresult
incancellation
ofthe
examinations
and/oran
enforcement
actionagainst
me
orthe
facilitylicensee.
Iwill
imm
ediatelyreportto
facilitym
anagement
orthe
NR
Cchief
examiner
anyindications
orsuggestions
thatexam
inationsecurity
may
havebeen
comprom
ised.
__
__
__
—9
2.
//¾’
..
..
..
To
thebest
ofm
yk
no
wle
d(l
didnotdivulge
toany
unauthorizedpersons
anyinform
ationconcerning
theN
RC
licensingexam
inationsadm
inisteredduring
thew
eek(s)of
__
__
__
__
_.
Fromthe
datethat
Ienteredinto
thissecurity
agreement
untilthe
completion
ofexam
inationadm
inistration,Idid
notinstruct,
evaluate,or
provideperform
ancefeedback
tothose
applicantsw
how
ereadm
inisteredth
eselicensing
examinations,
exceptas
specificallynoted
belowand
authorizedby
theN
RC
.
PRIN
TE
DN
AM
ED
AT
ESIG
NA
TU
RE
(2)D
AT
EN
OT
EJO
BTITLE
/R
ESPO
NSIB
ILIT
Y
14cb
,ip
j:
iJ-.-iIçJg
-/3c
NI?
SIGN
AT
UR
E(1)
(9
,Y-h
,_C
/444
;t--
-
__
4d
7jA
4h
r(-_
----
57317
c/
q’-/3
__
____
____
____
__
_s-i/-i3
AJ
0-
7)‘‘7
z3
/g3
•
-s•
‘-
3
ES
-201,P
age
27
of28
Form
ES
-20
14
1.P
re-Exam
ination
4(/zqf7I acknow
ledgethat
Ihaveacquired
specializedknow
ledgeaboutthe
NR
Clicensing
examinations
scheduledfor
thew
eek(s)of .7’&
f 2as
of thedate
ofmy
signature.Iagree
thatI w
illnotknow
inglydivulge
anyInform
ationabout these
examinations
toany
personsw
hohave
notbeen
authorizedby
theN
RC
chiefexam
iner.u
nd
erstand
thatIam
nottoinstruct,
evaluate,or
provideperform
ancefeedback
tothose
applicantsscheduled
tobe
administered
theselicensing
examinations
fromthis
dateuntil
completion
of examination
administration,
except asspecifically
notedbelow
andauthorized
bythe
NR
C(e.g.,
actingas
asim
ulatorbooth
operatororcom
municator
isacceptable
iftheindividual
doesnotselect the
trainingcontent
orprovide
director
indirectfeedback).
Furthermore,
Iamaw
areofthe
physicalsecurity
measures
andrequirem
ents(as
documented
ihthe
facilitylicensee’s
procedures)and
understandthatviolation
oftheconditions
ofthisagreem
entm
ayresult
incancellation
oftheexam
inationsand!or
anenforcem
entaction
againstme
orthe
facilitylicensee.
Iwill
imm
ediatelyreport
tofacility
managem
entor
theN
RC
chiefexam
inerany
indicationsor
suggestionsthat
examination
securitym
ayhave
beencom
promised.
2.P
ost-Exam
Ination/•
f41i3
..
..
To
thebest
ofm
yknow
ledg(I
didnotdivulge
toany
unauthorizedpersons
anyinform
ationconcerning
theN
RC
licensingexam
inationsadm
inisteredduring
thew
eek(s)of
‘.
Fromthe
datethat
I enteredinto
thissecurity
agreement
until thecom
pletionofexam
inationadm
inistration,I did
notinstruct,
evaluate,or
provideperform
ancefeedback
tothose
applicantsw
how
ereadm
inisteredthese
licensingexam
inations,exceptas
specificallynoted
belowand
authorizedby
theN
RC
.JOB
TIT
LE
!R
ESPO
NSIB
ILIT
Y
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
c,
‘LX
’1(‘J
c’F
_____________________
_____
___________________________________
____________
J,çs4/7
14.4
.,
S
__
__
IL
£a’h°C
D
rc-r-irӍ
C.y
)pp
Q’.S
5S/‘vU
rfS
’cw
4i\Z
c
)E
S-201
V%-T-te/.•:•
,qc-Y
/vE
xam
inatio
nS
ecurityA
qreem
ent
PRIN
TE
DN
AM
E
1.2.ar-
3.C
.fr1
-+Uerr,’iicn1iM
SIGN
AT
UR
E(1)
[t4.
7i.,
5.L
/1-.
jA
$‘1.
OI$IA
.7._
_4f
/-,c_
8.L
1-
jZ
4.
9.P
-1
10.ñ
‘14t
S43E.tf,.
12.
DA
TESIG
NA
TU
RE
(2)D
ATE
NO
TE
-
IIT
’Y
ç_Jg_j34.
ç1s
__
__
__
__
__
(O!O
3L4i—
i—(i-i
(Jc
(cyL
-13
-
FA
--—
__
__
__
__
__
__
ss4
____
5V
7./7
_41.-
‘I-If-J
er4
-14.
-J.isEjit6
4s
15.L
’p
t±
o4
NO
TES:
WI-
F
Z:
dJd
”2
i—/
f.zo/.3
-g-jc
13O
JO
(Zb?
i74S
-/,8
/I/71.4-k1
.--.
:-3
ES
-201,P
age
27of28
Vogtle
HL
-18N
RC
Exam
LV
ES
-201E
xam
inatio
nS
ecurity
Agreem
ent
Fo
rmE
S-201-3
1.P
re-Exam
ination
Iacknowledge
thatIhave
acquiredspecialized
knowledge
aboutthe
NR
Clicensing
examinations
scheduledfor
thew
eek(s)of
4/15,4/29,
5/6/13as
ofthe
dateof
my
signature.Iagree
thatI w
illnot
knowingly
divulgeany
information
aboutth
eseexam
inationsto
anypersons
who
havenot
beenauthorized
bythe
NR
Cchief
examiner.
Iunderstandthat
Iamnot
toinstruct,
evaluate,or
provideperform
ancefeedback
tothose
applicantsscheduled
tobe
administered
these
licensingexam
inationsfrom
thisdate
untilcom
pletionof
examination
administration,
exceptas
specificallynoted
belowand
authorizedby
theN
RC
(e.g.,acting
asa
simulator
boothoperator
orcom
municator
isacceptable
iftheindividual
doesnot
selectthe
trainingcontent
orprovide
director
indirectfeedback).
Furtherm
ore,Iam
aware
ofthe
physicalsecurity
measu
resand
requirements
(asdocum
entedin
thefacility
licensee’sprocedures)
andunderstand
thatviolation
ofthe
conditionsof
thisagreem
entm
ayresult
incancellation
ofthe
examinations
and/oran
enforcement
actionagainst
me
orthe
facilitylicensee.
Iwill
imm
ediatelyreport
tofacility
managem
entor
theN
RC
chiefexam
inerany
indicationsor
suggestionsthat
examination
securitym
ayhave
beencom
promised.
2.P
ost-Exam
inationI
To
thebest
ofm
yknow
ledgIdid
notdivulge
toany
unauthorizedpersons
anyinform
ationconcerning
theN
RC
licensingexam
inationsadm
inisteredduring
thew
eek(s)of
_________
Fromthe
datethat
Ienteredinto
thissecurity
agreement
untilthe
completion
ofexam
inationadm
inistration,Idid
notinstruct,
evaluate,or
provideperform
ancefeedback
tothose
applicantsw
how
ereadm
inisteredth
eselicensing
examinations,
exceptas
specificallynoted
belowand
authorizedby
theN
RC
.
PRIN
TE
DN
AM
E
1L
4lt(
3.J
o’w
fr1j?ow
cbfrk
4.cS
’.6.
*iz
..O&
htZ
fL-D
7.bsc-
8.t.
L)c,.Icp
.
9.(
10.)h#w
v’11.
(i4
12
jti(fl
12.13.
Pk
JL
14.vr(
15.C
vR
,f,et
oii,$
gt
NO
TE
S:
SIGN
AT
UR
E(1)
p.(
jZ
)
JOB
TIT
LE
/R
ESPO
NSIB
ILIT
Y
S‘
Siip
JcI.ec
S’nw.(tI
u-
s-i
Sp
er”’
NP
cI
FJP
O
‘ii \/
1L
3
Z-(’-1
S
-Z
7-
13
zfzi(i3
DA
TE
SIGN
AT
UR
(2)D
AT
EN
OT
E
____
4’r
9
__
_
,fw
i#
‘r
__
___
5-i’f’3
AJFt)
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_____
__
___
cN
13
.ist-.
___
___
_
Ss
‘_
—2p2I?/-
L,_/,,_I,z
05
!i1
./L
3IGI
/
Vogtle HL-18 NRC Exam
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
1. Pre-Examination
acknowledge that have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 4/15. 4129, 5/6/13as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not beenauthorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled tobe administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion oi examination administration, except as specifically noted below andauthorized by the NRC (e.g.. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content orprovide direct or Indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facilitylicensee’s procedures) and understand that violation ot the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or anenforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications orsuggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination/
To the best of my knowIedg(’l did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administeredduring the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did notinstruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically notedbelow and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME
12.C4’I uILer
_______________
3. ,io.L.
‘
5. 66. Ftn &Z1L.P7.8.i!i.t D. .)I&.’..9. t.e.i ZOeh.10. S+evI? t)i,moi’
___________
11. LAl-c*PIkP 4flW
____________
12. 1t4
_____________
13. ç14. j(e (.o
____________
15.Cf.f tvs.4Xt a p5 1ws7,NOTES:
DATE
sW4__1.
_______________
-
______ _______________
7=— —
.!L2i_
SIGNATIJR (2)JOB TITLE? RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
-
________________
Sii, ck .€c
______
psss sJ
N Pc
ñ)tO
______________
—r.
______________________
DATE NOTE
If
S .i’i’ii
/
Vogtle
HL
-18N
RC
Exam
ES
-201
Ex
amin
ation
Secu
rityA
greem
ent
Form
ES
-201-3
1.P
re-Exam
ination
Iacknowledge
thatIhave
acquiredspecialized
knowledge
aboutthe
NR
Clicensing
examinations
scheduledfor
thew
eek(s)of
4/15,4/29,
5/6/13as
ofthedate
ofm
ysignature.
Iagreethat
Iwillnot
knowingly
divulgeany
information
abouttheseexam
inationsto
anypersons
who
havenot
beenauthorized
bythe
NR
Cchief
examiner.
Iunderstandthat
I amnotto
instruct,evaluate,
orprovide
performance
feedbackto
thoseapplicants
scheduledto
beadm
inisteredth
eselicensing
examinations
fromthis
dateuntil
completion
ofexam
inationadm
inistration,except
asspecifically
notedbelow
aridauthorized
bythe
NR
C(e.g.,
actingas
asim
ulatorbooth
operatoror
comm
unicatoris
acceptableif the
individualdoes
notselect
thetraining
contentor
providedirect
orindirect
feedback).Furtherm
ore,Iam
aware
ofthe
physicalsecurity
measures
andrequirem
ents(as
documented
inthe
facilitylicensee’s
procedures)and
understandthat
violationof
theconditions
ofthis
agreement
may
resultin
cancellationof
theexam
inationsand/or
anenforcem
entactionagainst
me
orthe
facilitylicensee.
I will
imm
ediatelyreport
tofacility
managem
entor
theN
RC
chiefexam
inerany
indicationsor
suggestionsthat
examination
securitym
ayhave
beencom
promised.
2.P
ost-E
xam
inatio
n/
To
thebest
ofm
yknow
ledgqldid
notdivulge
toany
unauthorizedpersons
anyinform
ationconcerning
theN
RC
licensingexam
inationsadm
inisteredduring
thew
eek(s)of
‘.
Fromthe
datethat
Ienteredinto
thissecurity
agreement
untilthe
completion
ofexam
inationadm
inistration,Idid
notinstruct,
evaluate,or
provideperform
ancefeedback
tothose
applicantsw
how
ereadm
inisteredthese
licensingexam
inations,except
asspecifically
notedbelow
andauthorized
bythe
NR
C.
jJ_
PRIN
TE
DN
AM
EJO
BTITLE
/ RE
SPON
SIBIL
ITY
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
Si
jUL
Lc,
g.c
—
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
I WL
4_4_(j_
_.9
__
‘e
--
1It.iI
te3.
Jovl.io
wdD
(p4.5.
__
__
__
__
_
6.9
frizi
IL
-
7.8.c’.L
L.
tAod’.
9,,t.1rs
1O
.*’1
c’h
‘)h4mc”
11
.c’t,PFh4Z
fl1
12.f1’frc
1
NP
cj’
k
SIGN
AT
UR
E(1)
),c
/
DA
TES
lGN
AT
UR
(2)D
ATE
NO
TE
i/\/1)
43
-L3
cv—)‘).M
’-L5-
P1
-1
9.-3
Z-P
t-S
2i’i,i
?
?“PO—
_____
Z-Z
i-13
r-_
4’) /O
&i3
-
...
I,4
J)
AV
IIJ
..-
..—
rbJ4,.JS
1’.
14...
Loc
L..
_““
Vogtle
HL
-18N
RC
Exam
ES
-201E
xam
inatio
nS
ecurity
Agreem
ent
Form
ES
-201-3
1.P
re-Exam
ination
Iacknowledge
thatI have
acquiredspecialized
knowledge
aboutthe
NR
Clicensing
examinations
scheduledfor
thew
eek(s)of
4/15,4/29,
5/6/13
asof
thedate
ofm
ysignature.
I agreethat
I will
notknow
inglydivulge
anyinform
ationabout
these
examinations
toany
personsw
hohave
notbeen
authorizedby
theN
RC
chiefexam
iner.Iunderstand
thatIam
notto
instruct,evaluate,
orprovide
performance
feedbackto
thoseapplicants
scheduledto
beadm
inisteredth
eselicensing
examinations
fromthis
dateuntil
completion
ofexam
inationadm
inistration,except
asspecifically
notedbelow
and
authorizedby
theN
RC
(e.g.,acting
asa
simulator
boothoperator
orcom
municator
isacceptable
if theindividual
doesnot
selectthe
trainingcontent
or
providedirect
orindirect
feedback).F
urthermore,
I amaw
areof
thephysical
securitym
easures
andrequirem
ents(as
documented
inthe
facility
licensee’sprocedures)
andunderstand
thatviolation
ofthe
conditionsof
thisagreem
entm
ayresult
incancellation
ofthe
examinations
and/oran
enforcement
actionagainst
me
orthe
facilitylicensee.
Iwill
imm
ediatelyreport
tofacility
managem
entor
theN
RC
chiefexam
inerany
indicationsor
suggestionsthat
examination
securitym
ayhave
beencom
promised.
2.P
ost-E
xam
inatio
nØs‘7’’zc
S7’&/i
To
thebest
ofm
yknow
ledg/
didnot
divulgeto
anyunauthorized
personsany
information
concerningthe
NR
Clicensing
examinations
administered
duringthe
week(s)
ofP’
.From
thedate
thatI entered
intothis
securityagreem
entuntil
thecom
pletionof
examination
administration,
Ididnot
instruct,evaluate,
orprovide
performance
feedbackto
thoseapplicants
who
were
administered
these
licensingexam
inations,except
asspecifically
noted
belowand
authorizedby
theN
RC
.
PRIN
TE
DN
AM
E
1.&&
4iJrn#r,2.
kvr+
”..
YrL
tr3.
Thci
1-,.T
kpp5o’i
4.4.L
4d
Lc’LJL5.
£)7
1d
Y6-
\‘LPjrt
8.c
H1
t39.
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
1O
.Jp
v1
erc
-v11.12.
/,W
Jj
13.L
-
14.Ji.’s1
5.I
FlN
OT
ES:
JOB
TIT
LE
/R
ESPO
NSIB
ILIT
Y
9o
Opath
O’6
j+rA
da
Ccw
+Pac4pP
iI?A
/jicJW
—
th°e41.7fjs/A
4€/’
fJP
-e
__
__
-
O.P
uiZ
A-7
74A
L5
2A1
crIzLL
—r?)
ii/
L?
AJP
OL
)
5i
rl,q)g
zr
oy
]1
r2
f
K1rr
AT
UR
E(1)
DA
TE
IN
AT
UR
E(2)
DA
TE
NO
TE
13i’37/2
3/
I
i/C
/.
J1%
i’
(4
4d1
‘i-/i
I’1I’t
S(6
Ra
/3
S—
IN
,;fE
’
-g
.7fftr-. .7
-
_c_
---.‘#.
....
.
_L
2./.L
24’4
•_J-q-L
.-i4
__
d’57’3I/’
Ii3...‘
-.
•‘-
._
‘,.I
________
Vogtle
HL
-18N
RC
Exam
(5
—
ES
-201E
xam
inatio
nS
ecurity
Agreem
ent
Form
ES
-201-3
1.P
re-Exam
ination
Iacknowledge
thatIhave
acquiredspecialized
knowledge
aboutthe
NR
Clicensing
examinations
scheduledfor
thew
eek(s)of
4/15,4/29,
5/6/13
asof
thedate
ofm
ysignature.
Iagreethat
I will
notknow
inglydivulge
anyinform
ationabout
these
examinations
toany
personsw
hohave
notbeen
authorizedby
theN
RC
chiefexam
iner.Iunderstand
thatIam
notto
instruct,evaluate,
orprovide
performance
feedbackto
thoseapplicants
scheduledto
beadm
inisteredth
eselicensing
examinations
fromthis
dateuntil
completion
ofexam
inationadm
inistration,except
asspecifically
notedbelow
and
authorizedby
theN
RC
(e.g.,acting
asa
simulator
boothoperator
orcom
municator
isacceptable
if theindividual
doesnot
selectthe
trainingcontent
or
providedirect
orindirect
feedback).F
urthermore,
Iamaw
areof
thephysical
securitym
easures
andrequirem
ents(as
documented
inthe
facility
licensee’sprocedures)
andunderstand
thatviolation
ofthe
conditionsof
thisagreem
entm
ayresult
incancellation
ofthe
examinations
and/oran
enforcement
actionagainst
me
orthe
facilitylicensee.
Iwill
imm
ediatelyreport
tofacility
managem
entor
theN
RC
chiefexam
inerany
indicationsor
suggestionsthat
examination
securitym
ayhave
beencom
promised.
__
__
__
__
_
‘41’2.
Post-E
xamination
W//
5Z
’’fiç/,y
To
thebest
ofm
yknow
led
9y(did
notdivulge
toany
unauthorizedpersons
anyinform
ationconcerning
theN
RC
licensingexam
inationsadm
inistered
duringthe
week(s)
of
__
__
__
__
_.
Fromthe
datethat
I enteredinto
thissecurity
agreement
untilthe
completion
ofexam
inationadm
inistration,I did
not
instruct,evaluate,
orprovide
performance
feedbackto
thoseapplicants
who
were
administered
these
licensingexam
inations,except
asspecifically
noted
belowand
authorizedby
theN
RC
.
SIGN
AT
UR
E(1)
______________
L$
4L
nn
__
____
97
_____
—1.
—2.
—3.
—.
4.—
‘5.
j.—
6.—
7.8.9.
PRIN
TE
DN
AM
EJO
BT
ITL
E/
RE
SPON
SIBIL
ITY
i?EtJIL
LU
II7)S
NP
OtU
J7
’ii4
&is
sIte
tsr,
1G
ok
.c
DA
TE
SIGN
AT
UR
E(2)
DA
TE
NO
TE
C-
(Y
\01
-A
IPOJc211
+JL
——
--
j’
vvefl
‘(‘)ps
jri
10.11.12.13.14.15.N
OT
ES:
119
j,g?4S
w—
7”t’7
?W
-,i
‘/L
j
Vogtle
11L48
NR
CE
xam
ES
-201E
xam
inatio
nS
ecurity
Agreem
ent
Form
ES
-201-3
1.P
ro-Exam
ination
Iacknowledge
thatI have
acquiredspecialized
knowledge
aboutthe
NR
Clicensing
examinations
scheduledforthe
week(s)
of4/15.
4129. 5/6/13as
ofthe
dateof
my
signature.Iag
reethat
I will
not knowingly
divulgeany
information
aboutthese
examinations
toany
personsw
hohave
notbeen
authorizedby
theN
RC
chiefexam
iner.I understand
thatI am
nottoinstruct,
evaluate,or
provideperform
ancefeedback
tothose
applicantsscheduled
tobe
administered
these
licensingexam
inationsfrom
thisdate
untilcompletion
ofexam
inationadm
inistration,except
asspecifically
notedbelow
andauthorized
bythe
NR
C(e.g.,
actingas
asim
ulatorbooth
operatoror
comm
unicatoris
acceptableif the
individualdoes
notselect
thetraining
contentor
providedirect
orindirectfeedback).
Furtherm
ore,Iam
aware
ofthe
physicalsecuritym
easuresand
requirements
(asdocum
entedin
thefacflity
licensee’sprocedures)
andunderstand
thatviolation
oftheconditions
ofthis
agreement
may
resultin
cancellationof
theexam
inationsand/or
anenforcem
entaction
againstm
eor the
facilitylicensee.
Iwill
imm
ediatelyreportto
facilitym
anagement
orthe
NR
Cchief
examiner
anyindications
orsuggestions
thatexam
inationsecurity
may
havebeen
comprom
ised.
2.P
ost-Exam
ination
To
thebest
ofm
yknow
ledge,Idid
notdivulge
toany
unauthorizedpersons
anyinform
ationconcerning
theN
RC
licensingexam
inationsadm
inistereddunng
thew
eek(s)of71‘
ri
JAiF
rom
thedate
thatI entered
intothis
secuntyagreem
entuntil
thecom
pletionof
examination
administration, I
didnot
instruct,evaluate,
orprovide
performance
feedbackto
thoseapplicants
who
were
administered
these
licensingexam
inations,except
asspecifically
notedbelow
andauthorized
bythe
NR
C.
PRIN
TE
DN
AM
EJO
BT
ITL
E/
RE
SPON
SIBIL
ITY
SIGN
AT
UR
E(1)
DA
TESiG
NA
TU
RE
(2)D
AT
EN
OT
E
1O
k.c
*.
LL
c4
.ir-i’.4
wP
I2
J,J/,3
__
__
__
___
__
__
__
__
__
__
OPs
ifef
Z43’.lJ
__
___
_
NO
TE
S:
Vogtle
HL
-18N
RC
Ex
am
ES
-201E
xam
inatio
nS
ecurity
Agreem
entF
ormE
S-201-3
1.P
re-Exam
inatio
n
ScS
c
S1L4
1’kirsss
4I.4
.S
4te
ri.c
,N
PcI
ñ)P
Ô
MO
lbJS
r-.
__
___
-
__
___
_____
__
fl-
t3-
-
__
__
_
t
I acknowledge
thatI have
acquiredspecialized
knowledge
about theN
RC
licensingexam
inationsscheduled
forthew
eek(s)of
4/15.4/29,5/6/13
asof
thedate
ofm
ysignature.
I agreethat
I willriot know
inglydivulge
anyinform
ationaboutthese
examinations
toany
personsw
hohave
notbeen
authorizedby
theN
RC
chiefexam
iner.Iunderstand
thatIam
nottoinstruct,
evaluate,or
provideperform
ancefeedback
tothose
applicantsscheduled
tobe
administered
theselicensing
examinations
fromthis
dateuntil
completion
ofexam
inationadm
inistration,except
asspecifically
notedbelow
andauthorized
bythe
NR
C(e.g.,
actingas
asim
ulatorbooth
operatoror
comm
unicatoris
acceptableifthe
individualdoes
not select thetraining
contentor
providedirector
indirect feedback).Furtherm
ore,Iam
aware
ofthephysical
securitym
easuresand
requirements
(asdocum
entedin
thefacility
licensee’sprocedures)
andunderstand
that violationof the
conditionsof this
agreement
may
resultin
cancellationof the
examinations
and/oran
enforcement action
againstm
eor
thefacility
licensee.Iw
illimm
ediatelyreport to
facilitym
anagement or
theN
RC
chiefexam
inerany
indicationsor
suggestionsthat
examination
securitym
ayhave
beencom
promised.
2.P
ost-E
xam
inatio
n/
To
thebest
ofm
yknow
fedgq(ldid
not divulgeto
anyunauthorized
personsany
information
concerningthe
NR
Clicensing
examinations
administered
duringthe
week(s)
of.
Fromthe
datethat
I enteredinto
thissecurity
agreementuntilthe
completion
of examination
administration,
I didnot
instruct,evaluate,
orprovide
performance
feedbackto
thoseapplicants
who
were
administered
theselicensing
examinations,
exceptas
specificallynoted
belowarid
authorizedby
theN
RC
.
PRIN
TEDN
AM
ED
ATE
NO
TE
1
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
ct.dL
eg3._
____________
4..
‘.
PM
’2L
—
_________
5.t
)
__
__
__
__
__
__
6.7.c
8.cL
lD
.)td
’9.
_____________
10.5#i94’kn,
hm
oi”
__
__
__
__
__
__
11.C
cP
lIZfl+
__
__
__
__
__
12.A
1/dWd1(-.fkc
__
__
__
__
__
__
13.14.-u
Lo
15
.C
5T
of#
.i!9
iR
o$
(i.si:,
NO
TE
S:
DA
TESIG
NA
TUR
(2)JO
BT1TLE
/R
ESPO
NSIB
ILIT
Y,..
SIGN
AT
UR
E(1)
pc
I-,
-____
M3
ti7Z
I/
Vogtle ilL-iS NRC Exam ()ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form E$-2qj1. Pre-Examlnatlen
4.A 5.p
8.GRc e,acoJ)9.
iai.-j—
ANOTES:
acknowledge that I have acquired epeclalized lcnowladge about the NRC licensing examinations echeduled for*he weelc(s) of 4115. 4129. w€tiaas of the date of mysignature. I agree that) will not knowlngly dIvulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not beenauthorized by the NRC chief examiner, understand that lam not to inskuct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled tobe admiristered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below antIauthorized by the NRC (e.g., noting as a simulator booth operator or communicator Is acceptable If the Individual does not select the training content OrprovIde direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, lam aware of the physical security measures and requIrements (as documented In the fanihitylicensaes procedures) end Lmderstend that violation of the condItions of this agreement may result In cancellation of the examinations and/or anen!oroemant action against me or the facility licensee. I wl immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications oreuggestlons that examination security may have bean compromised.2. Post-ExamInatIon Øi. q/tcTo the best of myknowledg dld not divulge to any unauthorized parsons any InformatIon concerning the NRC licensing examinations administeredduring the Week(s) of P From the date that I entered Into this secwtty agreement until the completion of examination administratIon. I did notInstruct, evaluate, or provIde performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically notedbelow and authorized by the NRC.
h54flifSQ’4’—- .._
— .- —
PRINTED NAME JOB TIUEJ RESPONSIBILrrY ATtiRE (1) DATE I NATURE (2)
__________________
______
‘71... ,.i -r’ -. ‘- ‘ ti A. ,“ J’f t’tjt.—
—4.,.
;2,7k —f-.—--I
— rrc ,‘s,,,@’.J
—“
DATE NOTE
-‘---——
: ‘
_________—
c Ce .Lc=—’ —,_----—
(_z-tw
______________
t’1 W%.,.. ...i :jpt’
S4s ECitd
—
-.t4iI’c /fz dk4U.
Vogtle 11L48 NRC Exam
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-31. Pre-Examlnation
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 4115. 4/29, 5/6/13as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not beenauthonzed by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled tobe administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examInation administration, except as specifically noted below andauthorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content orprovide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented In the facilityllcensee’s procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or anenforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any Indications orsuggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-ExamInation q/zc 5/&/f?To the best of myknowledg/’did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administeredduring the week(s) of P . From the date that I entered Into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did notinstruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically notedbelow and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE! RESPONSIBILITY SlNATURE(1) DATE I NATURE (2) DATE NOTEa1*j1.
2. J oh LrldaC3, 7f’7OSo,! - xa,,.,4. J4J LJL f’zt77,r ,c.1r-.-
‘i’17Aff?,
9. .‘v’tI. S.,i.10. Y,
- s
tt j_T.’f’ 0 —aC44tZ cko 1AJ T1Z’Jafl
c j’JIt1211: 1;1%.r I I;7;,0113. tAikv css c’t 4/II414.., Jw scs
• 15.%4 i i s.k.5’C IcNOTES:
Vogtle HL-18 NRC Exam
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES201-3
1. Pre-Examination
I acknowledge that have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 4/15. 49. 5W13as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not beenauthorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that lam not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled tobe administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below aridauthorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content orprovide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, lam aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facilitylicensee’s procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor anenforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chiet examiner any indications orsuggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Pest-ExaminatIon
To the best of my knowtadg1(did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administeredduring the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did notinstruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically notedbelow and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TIRE I RESPONSIBILITY ,...., SIGNATURE (1)
____________
____ ___________
2. 1u lLa’ i ‘Juct
______________ ____
3. .io i.iei.tiofnk 5iwfa
_____
4. F#fzL4- Sss- .4’5.
—7
____
6. Sfr NFt>
____
7. TO..kS—
8. el&’.
________________________________________________________________
9. te dL
____________
10. S+e4/a ,V 0
________________
1l.Ac’.Plfi itfli
_______________________________ _________________
12. jft,ótd 1f6 AJP13. i
__________________
(4. J(eu ,
______________________ _______________________________
O$NOTES:
SIGNATUR (2) DATE NOTEc4 —
DATE
-
-
_2Ii — —
.k 3.A#L skn$E?r T?/
FINALES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1
Facility: 1 & 2 Date of Examination: 04/15/2013Examination Level: RO 2i SRO Operating Test Number:
Administrative Topic (see Note) Type Describe activity to be performedCode*
R M V-NRC-JP-14915-HL18Conduct of Operations (a) ‘
Calculate Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio
Description: With data provided, candidate willperform 1491 5-1, Data Sheet 7, for QPTR monitoring.
. G2.1.7(4.4/4.7)
V-NRC-JP-000i 2-HL1 8Conduct of Operations (b) R, M .
Identify On-Shift Manning Requirements forConditions Provided
Description: Candidate will determine if the minimumon-shift staffing requirements are met and willdetermine if a crew member can fulfill two specific EROpositions.
G2.i.5 (2.9*13.9)
V-NRC-JP-i 4825-H Li 8Equipment Control (c) R, N
Evaluate Surveillance Test Data
Description: Candidate will evaluate quarterly valvetest surveillance data and determine if the requiredacceptance criteria are met.
G2.2.i2(3.714.i)
V-NRC-JP-00930-HL1 8Radiation Control (d)
R, D, P Proper RWP Implementation
Description: Candidate will determine properprotective clothing requirements, projected dose, andwhether the RWP is appropriate for the job task.
G2.3.7 (3.5 I 3.6)
Emergency Procedures/Plan (e) N/A N/A
NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they areretaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
* Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom(D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1)(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)
FINALES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1
Facility: Vogtle 1 & 2 Date of Examination: 04/1 5/2013Examination Level: RO SAC IZI SROU ZI Operating Test Number: 201 3-301
Administrative Topic (see Note) Type Describe activity to be performedCode*
V-NRC-JP-1 491 5-HL1 8Conduct of Operations (a) R, M
Evaluate Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio
Description: With data provided, candidate willperform 1491 5-1, Data Sheet 7, for QPTR monitoring,evaluate data, and take appropriate action.
G2.1 .7 (4.4 / 4.7)
V-NRC-JP-0001 2-HL1 8Conduct of Operations (b) A, M
Evaluate On-Shift Manning Requirements forConditions Provided
Description: Candidate will determine if the minimumon-shift staffing requirements are met and identifyrequired actions any time minimum staffingrequirements are not met.
G2.1.5 (2.9*/3.9)
V-NRC-JP-14825-HL1 8Equipment Control (c) A, N
Evaluate Surveillance Test Data
Description: Candidate will evaluate quarterly valvetest surveillance data, determine it the requiredacceptance criteria are met, and specify TechnicalSpecification required actions.
G2.2.12(3.7/4.1)
V-NRC-JP-00930-HL1 8Radiation Control (d) R, D, P
Proper RWP Implementation
Description: Candidate will determine properprotective clothing requirements, projected dose, andwhether the RWP is appropriate for the job task.
G2.3.7 (3.5 / 3.6)
V-NRC-JP-NMP-EP-1 12-HL18Emergency Procedures/Plan (e) R, D
Determine Offsite Protective ActionRecommendations
Description: The candidate will determine PARs forthe given emergency and complete the PARWorksheet.
G2.4.44 (4.4)
NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they areretaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
* Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom(D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1)(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301 -2
Facility: Vocdle 1 & 2 Date of Examination: 04/15/2013Exam Level: RO ii SRO-l SRO-U Operating Test Number:
Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-l); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)
System / JPM Title Type Code* SafetyFunction
a. V-NRC-JP-13105-HL18: Increase Accumulator Level at Low D, EN, L, S 3RCS Pressure
Description: The unit is in Mode 4 at 340 psig and stable. A leakon Accumulator #2 has been repaired, but low pressure and lowlevel annunciators remain lit. The candidate is directed to restoreAccumulator #2 level and pressure sufficiently to clear the low leveland low pressure annunciators using 13105-1.
(RD I SRO-l / SRO-U)
006A1.13 (3.5 / 3.7)
b. V-NRC-JP-13011-HL18: Perform an RCS Cooldown Using D, L, S 4PRHR Train A
Description: A unit cooldown from Mode 4 to Mode 5 is inprogress. RHR Train ‘A’ warm-up is complete. The candidate isdirected to initiate full RHR Train ‘A’ flow and cool down the RCSto 315°F ± 5°F without exceeding 100°F in any hour.
(RD / SRO-l I SRO-U)
005A4.01 (3.6 / 3.4)
c. V-NRC-JP-18009-HL18: Transfer Steam Dumps to Steam A, D, L, S 4SPressure Mode
Description: The reactor has been shut down due to a steamgenerator tube leak. The candidate will transfer steam dumps tothe steam pressure mode using 18009-C, but they will not controlproperly and ARV usage will be required to control heat-up.
(RD / SRO-l / SRO-U)
039A2.04 (3.4 / 3.7)
d. V-NRC-JP-13009-HL18: Emergency Borate from the RWST A, D, P, S
Description: The candidate will be required to initiate anemergency boration in response to a ROD BANK LO-LO LIMITalarm using 13009-1. The RWST flow path will be required foremergency boration due to equipment failures.
(RO / SRO-l)
024AA2.01 (3.8* / 4.1)
e. V-NRC-JP-19001-HL18: Establish Safety Grade Letdown D, L, P, S 2
Description: The unit was manually tripped due to a non-isolableinstrument air break. Candidate is required to place safety gradeletdown in service and establish a 40 gpm flow rate to control RCSinventory.
(RO / SRO-l)
004A2.1 1 (3.6 / 4.2)
f. V-NRC-JP-13130-HL18: Place Containment Hydrogen A, EN, L, M, P, S 5Monitors in Service
Description: A LOCA has occurred and the candidate is directedto place the Containment Hydrogen Monitors in service using13130-1. The Common Failure light will illuminate requiring thecandidate to return the monitor to standby.
(RO / SRO-l)
028A4.03 (3.1 / 3.3)
g. V-NRC-JP-13320-HL18: Post-Accident Cleanup of the FHB N, S 8Using the Normal Exhaust Units
Description: A spent fuel assembly was dropped in the SpentFuel Pool. To expedite cleanup of airborne radioactivity, thecandidate will be required to use 1 3320-C to perform post-accidentclean up of the Fuel Handling Building using the normal exhaustunits.
(RO / SRO-l)
034A2.01 (3.6 / 4.4)
h. V-NRC-JP-13830-HL18: Establish Field Excitation Using D, S RO ONLYManual Voltage Regulation for Main Generator
6Description: The unit is starting up following a refueling outage.The main turbine is at 1800 rpm and main generator / exciterpreparations are complete. The candidate will use 13830-1 toestablish main generator field excitation with manual voltageregulation.
(AC)
062A4.04 (2.6)
In-Plant Systems (3 for RO); (3 for SAC-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)
V-NRC-JP-13903-HL18: Locally Emergency Start Diesel- A, D, E 8Driven Fire Pump
Description: With a diesel fire pump tagged out for repairs, alarge fire caused fire header pressure to drop. The standby dieselfire pump failed to start, so the candidate will be dispatched toperform a local manual start of the standby diesel fire pump. Thelocal pushbutton start for the first battery will not work, which willrequire the use of the second battery to start the engine.
(AC I SAC-I I SRC-U)
086A2.02 (3.0 / 3.3)
ALTERNATE I: V-NRC-JP-i3509-HL18: Bypass Containment C, D, EN, L 7High-i Following a Loss of Heat Sink
Description: During a loss of heat sink, the restoration of feedwater is required with containment pressure greater than the High-1 setpoint. The candidate will be required to bypass containmenthigh-i pressure channels i-PB936B and i-PB935B usingprocedure 1 3509-C.
(AC / SRC-l / SAC-U)
01 2A4.03 (3.6 / 3.6)
j. V-NRC-JP-i7213-HL18: Respond to i-RE-0018 Alarm During a A, E, M, A 9Liquid Radwaste Release Unit 1 OR ALTERNA TE jon Unit 2:
Description: During a liquid radwaste release, a high alarm isreceived on 1-RE-0018. The candidate will be directed to respondto the Waste Process Liquid Panel (PLPP) and take theappropriate actions per 17213-1. 1 -RE-001 8 will not close, somanual isolation will be required.
(ROISRC-I/SRC-U)
059AA2.05 (3.6 / 3.9)
k. V-NRC-JP-18038-HL18: Start Emergency Diesel Generator A, E, L, N 6From Outside the Control Room Unit 2 or ALTERNATE k:Same JPM on Unit 1.
Description: The control room has been evacuated and controlhas been established at the shutdown panels. To re-energize2AA02, the candidate will locally start 2A EDG using Attachment Bof 18038-2. After starting, high jacket water temperature willrequire tripping the diesel locally.
(RO I SRO-l)
064A1 .03 (3.2 / 3.3)ALTERNATE k:
ALTERNATEk: V-NRC-JP-18038-1-HL18: Locally Energize D, E, L 6Train A Switchgear Following Local Diesel Start
Description: The control room has been evacuated and controlhas been established at the shutdown panels. DG1A has beenlocally started. The candidate will locally energize Unit 1, Train ‘A’4160 VAC and 480 VAC buses using Attachment B of 18038-1.
(ROISRO-I)
062A2.05 (2.9 / 33*)
@ All RO and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safetyfunctions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions mayoverlap those tested in the control room.
* Type Codes Criteria for RO I SRO-l I SRO-U
(A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3(C)ontrol room(D)irectfrombank 9I8/4(E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 I 1 I 1(EN)gineered safety feature - I - / 1 (control room system)(L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1 I 1 / 1(N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2 I 2 I 1(P)revious 2 exams 3 I 3 I 2 (randomly selected)(R)CA 1/1I1(S)imulator
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3
Facility: OtL.E t Date of Examination: 3 Operating Test Number:
Initials1. General Criteria
a b* c#
a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent withsampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). ,i9t “ñ
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administeredduring this examination.
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants’ audit test(s). (see Section D.1 .a.)—
d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is withinacceptable limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competentapplicants at the designated license level. —
2. Walk-Through Criteria -- --a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
• initial conditions• initiating cues• references and tools, including associated procedures• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific
designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee• operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
— detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature— system response and other examiner cues— statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant— criteria for successful completion of the task— identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards— restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable —
b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-throughoutlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptancecriteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specifiedon those forms and Form ES-201-2. Z
3. Simulator Criteria -- --The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance withForm ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. - “. —
Printed Name! Si nature Date
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer(*) Ott/o/ (3c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)124(Ik4MJ ‘ 4/&/2oij
d. NRC Supervisor b—VT tt o’,’,,43
NOTE: * The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column “c’; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4
Facilty: Vogtle 1 & 2 Date of Exam: 4-15, 4-22, 5-06 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 / 3 Operating Test No.: 2013-301
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials —
a b* c#
1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be outof service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. i43. Each event description consists of
. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiatede the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew• the expected operator actions (by shift position)• the event termination point (if applicable) —
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenariowithout a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtaincomplete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.Cues are given. c
8. The simulator modeling is not altered. /L
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulatorperformance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluatedto ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
—
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and eventsspecified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes --
1. Total malfunctions (5—8) 10 / 9 / 10
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1—2)4 4 / 3 / 3 ‘- fr3. Abnormal events (2—4) 4 I 5 I 4
4. Major transients (1—2) 1 / 1 / 1
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1—2) 1 I 2 / 2
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0—2) 0 / 0 I 0
7. Critical tasks (2—3) 3 / 3 I 3 V
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4
Facilty: Vogtle 1 & 2 Date of Exam: 4-15, 4-22, 5-06 Scenario Numbers: 4 / 5 I Operating Test No.: 201 3-301
QUALITATIVE ATFRIBUTES — Initials —
a b* c#
1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be outof service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. —
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event description consists of. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated. the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew. the expected operator actions (by shift position)• the event termination point (if applicable) — —
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenariowithout a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtaincomplete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
—
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.Cues are given. .4 —
8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulatorperformance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluatedto ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. —
11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). —
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and eventsspecified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. .
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- --
1. Total malfunctions (5—8) 9 / 10 /
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1—2)4 3 / 4 /
3. Abnormal events (2—4) 4 / 5 / ,
4. Major transients (1—2) 2 I 1 /
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1—2) 2 / 2 /
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0—2) 2 / 0 /
7. Critical tasks (2—3) 3 / 2 /
0CU)
wE0U-
—Z
—D
DC
—c
c—
—I
I
—-
—-
cJc.j
——
.c.’J
I
C\J‘-
—C’.J
C’J
C’J C.
ci1 oj _—
.c’
c
II
—
c)0)
IIC
)
L().
—
II
F-O
F-<
--JcrQ
Q_
r
z __H
HH
:
____
zo
IU
)
a)
;I
II
III
crion
cj
z
_a)
__
__
-
JcZ
HO
__
__
__
__
—a)
a)ii
II
Ca)
C,)
0c\i6z0G)I0
)
a)G)0.
0
4-
.!c,
0(9
0to
kUic4
4-
2.C)
LU—0L
a)I—
•cz
cL0
Q-
Q_
WI—
<r-o
_______W-,
-)-)
)0
>>,
—D
—D
—Z)
5
C?<
O-O
.-J—
Q<
ZF
-6
66
66
6g3
IIL
1J[1
.- -
0a)O
.2G)
(I
H‘—
‘
1_
01
V0
0<
a)a_
a)
0‘—
00
.C
C13)
.7ca
CC)
a)—
(1)C
V5
013)
C>
caa)0
a)
—Ci)‘
a)
0.C
(‘I—
a)-__
C—
C.9
—0
13)13)
.0)0
Cu_
C-
-a)
—C
0a)0
0a)
—C
0a)O
u)
220
E°
0
o2
0.
00)
C.9
.—a)
=Cl)
C,—
0.
113(1)
)—
C?
0a.
1130
i)0
—0
.0-0
a)-
o:
—-
g0.—
C(1)
-.-
0.0
a)C0
‘caa)
Ei.°
20
C)
a)_.—
_Ca
0C0
Ca)
Caa_
oO
13)13)
Ca)
a).C
0)
—>
a)C
C-
.0—
0V
oc
-0a)
c13.20
..
0—0
a)
__
-_0
.L0C
0C
V.2
c—
a)CU
000
OC
Caa)
025cr
C—
.0Ca
CU2-.13)
CC
CO00
0.0
.o5
<8
E0
CC
O
0a)
.9V
U)_
Oa)
a)C0.2
0a)
-Do
2Ca
.0>‘
80—
a)
C0—
.2DEio
2>
D5
.2
C1
30ID
a)>
CE
cI)a)
22C20
13
)
>_
CU
00
00
.2o
-
8
-°2
0.1.
C—
-C1139
•5_s
.2E
‘—
-C0
——
>
C—
0.C
00
.0)
2a)
0.9
.S0
—
C-
a)
0a)
—‘-
0C
0..
a)0.
-CU
.::;a)
00-
.9g:
0CU
V.00
00.
a)0
>0
‘-.
a)>
Z9
Ca
W>
WZ
I-
I->
-Q
—.
I
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301 -5
Facility: Vogtle 1 and 2 Date of Exam: 4-1 5-13, 4-29-13, 5-6-13 Operating Test No.: 201 3-301
A E ScenariosP V 5 6 7 T MP E o IL N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N
I T POSfl1ON POSlON AI
C S A B S A B S A B S A B LA T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P
T PR IU
E
RO-lNOR
8 4 4 2
SRO-U 10,1112
MAJ 7,8 2 2 2 1
TS 1,3,5 3022
RO RX 0 110
NOR 4 1 111SRO-l I/C 1,3, 4 4 4 2
10,11 — — —
SRO-U MAJ 7,8 2 2 2 1
D TS 0022
PC RX 0 110
E NOR 0111SRO-l I/C 2,6, 4 4 4 2E 9,12 — — — —SRO-U MAJ 7,8 2 2 2 1
D TS 0022
Instructions:
1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for eachevent type; TS are not applicable for PC applicants. ROs must serve in both the “at-the-controls (ATC)”and “balance-of-plant (BOP)” positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions,including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATCposition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be creditedtoward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer toSection D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix ft (*) Reactivity and normalevolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-i basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only thosethat require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant’s competence count toward the minimumrequirements specified for the applicant’s license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist
Facility: Vogtle 1 & 2 Date of Examination: 4-15-13, 4-29-13, 5-6-13 Operating Test No.: 2013-301
APPLICANTS
CompetenciesRO X SRO-I X
SRO-U__X
SCENARIO______ SCENARIO
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Interpret/Diagnose 3,4,5,6, 1,2,4, 3,4,5, 1,2, 3,4,5, 3,45,6 1,2,4, 3,4,5,6, 1,2,3,4,5,
Events and Conditions 7,8,9, 5, 6,7, 6, 7, 8, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 7,8,9, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8,9, 6, 7, 8, 9, 1010,11, 8,9,10 9,10, 10,11, 8,9,10 10,11,12
12 11,12 12
Comply With and 1, 2, 3, 1, 2,3, 1, 2,3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2,3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2,3, 4, 1, 2,3,4, 5,4,5,6, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 6,7,8,9,10, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 5,6,7,8, 6,7,8,9,10,
Use Procedures (1) 7,8,9, 7,8,9, 7,8,9, 7,8,9, 7,8,9, 9, 10, 11,10,11, 10 10,11, 10,11, 10 12
12 12 12
Operate Control 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4,5, I4, 5, 6, 4, 5, 6, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, I
Boards (2) 7, 8, 9, 7, 8, 9 7, 8, 9, I10,11, 10,11,
12 12
Communicate 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4,5, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4,5,4,5,6, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 6,7,8,9,10, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 5,6,7,8, 6,7,8,9,10,
and Interact 7, 8,9, 7, 8,9, 7, 8,9, 7,8,9, 7,8,9, 9, 10, 11,10, 11, 10 10, 11, 10, 11, 10 12
12 12 12
Demonstrate 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4,5,4,5,6, 4,5,6, 5,6,7,8, 6,7,8,9,10,
Supervisory Ability (3) 7, 8,9, 7, 8,9, 9, 10, 11,I I 10,11, 10 12I I 12
Comply With and I 3,4,6 1,2,4, 5,6,7 1,3,4
Use Tech. Specs. (3) I j 6
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.(2) Optional for an SRO-U.(3) Only applicable to SACs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants’ license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow theexaminers to evaluate eveiy applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 -6 Competencies Checklist
Facility: Vogtle 1 & 2 Date of Examination: 4-15-13, 4-29-13, 5-6-13 Operating Test No.: 2013-301
APPLICANTS
CompetenciesRO SRO-l X
SRO-U__X
SCENARIO______ SCENARIO
5 6 7 5 6 7
Interpret/Diagnose 1,2,3, 1,2,3,
Events and Conditions %‘10,11, 10,11,
12 12,
Comply With and 1, 2,3, 1, 2, 3,
Use Procedures (1) : : : : : :10,11, 10,11,
12 12
Operate Control
Boards (2)
10, 11,
12
Communicate 1,2,3, 1,2,3,45,6 456
and Interact 7, 8, 9, 7, 8, 9,10, 11, 10, 11,
12 12
Demonstrate 1, 2, 3,
Supervisory Ability (3) ‘ ‘ ‘
10, 11,
12
Comply With and 1,3,5
Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.(2) Optional for an SRO-U.(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:Check the applicants’ license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow theexaminers to evaluate eveiy applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2
[ Facility: VOGTLE Date of Exam: APRIL2013
—— çaoPts_ — SPO-Only PointsTier Group 1
KKKKKKAAAAGJ A2 G Total1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 *jTotal- = = = — = = — = = = =
1. 1 333 33 3 18 3 3 6Emergency &Abnormal 2 j j_ 1. N/A 2 2 N/A 1 9 2 2 4
Evolutions Tier Totals 4 4 5 5 5 4 27 5 5 10
1 32332323322 28 2 3 52.Plant 2 111!!! 10 1 1 1 3
SystemsTier Totals 4 3 4 4 3 4 2 £ 4 3 3 38 4 4 8
3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7Categories3 2 2 3 1 2 2 2
Note: 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the ROand SRO-only outlines (i.e.. except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the 9ier Totalsin each K/A category shall not be less than two).2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table.The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by ±1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions.The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not applyat the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems/evolutions that are notincluded on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.1 .b of ES-401 for guidance regarding the eliminationof inappropriate K/A statements.4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group beforeselecting a second topic for any system or evolution.5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected.Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.6. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.7* The generic (G) K/As in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topicsmust be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.1 .b of ES-401 for the applicable K/As.8. On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics’ importance ratings (IRS)for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totalsfor each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on theSRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicatepages for RO and SRO-only exams.
9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the K/A catalog, and enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs,and point totals (#) on Form ES-401 -3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.
ES-
401,
REV
9T
1G1
PWR
EXA
MIN
ATI
ON
OU
TL
INE
FOR
ME
S-40
1-2
KA
NA
ME
ISA
FET
YFU
NC
TIO
N:
IRK
i1(
2K
3K
4K
5K
6A
lA
2A
3A
4G
TO
PIC
:R
OSR
O
007E
K1
.02
Rea
ctor
Trtp
-St
abili
zatio
n-
Rec
over
y3.
43.
8LI
HLI
[1[]
[][]
[]Sh
utdo
wn
mar
gin
11
008A
G2.
4.2
Pre
ssur
izer
Vap
orS
pace
Acc
iden
t/ 3
4.5
4.6
HLI
LiK
now
ledg
eof
syst
emse
tpo
ints
,in
terl
ocks
and
auto
mat
icac
tion
sas
soci
ated
with
EO
Pen
try
cond
ition
s.
OO
9EA
1.0
4Sm
all
Bre
akLO
CA
/3
3.7
3.5
HH
HH
Hl
HH
HH
CV
CS
011
EK
2.02
Lar
geB
reak
LOC
A/
32.
62.
7H
JH
ElLI
LILi
LiH
LIH
Pum
ps
015A
K3.
01R
CP
Mal
func
tions
/42.
53.
1H
HLi
HLI
LILI
HH
[JPo
tent
ial
dam
age
from
high
win
ding
and/
orbe
arin
gte
mpe
ratu
res
022A
A2.
01L
oss
ofR
xC
oola
ntM
akeu
p/2
3.2
3.8
LiH
HLi
HLi
HII
LiLi
HW
heth
erch
argi
nglin
ele
akex
ists
025A
G2.
4.21
Los
sof
RH
RS
yste
m/
4-
4.0
4.6
LiLi
HLi
HH
HLi
fK
now
ledg
eof
the
para
met
ers
and
logi
cus
edto
asse
ssth
est
atus
ofsa
fety
func
tions
026A
A2.
02L
oss
ofC
ompo
nent
Coo
ling
Wat
er/
82.
93.
6Li
HH
LiLi
LiLI
IlH
LiH
The
caus
eof
poss
ible
CC
Wlo
ss
029E
K30
3A
TW
S/
13.
73.
6H
LiII
LiH
LILi
LiH
HH
Ope
ning
BIT
inle
tan
dou
tlet
valv
es
038E
K1.
03S
team
Gen
.T
ube
Ru
ptu
re/S
3.9
4.2
-tI
HH
HH
LiH
HH
HH
Nat
ural
circ
ulat
ion
054A
A1
.04
Los
sof
Mai
nF
eedw
ater
/4
4.4
4.5
LiLi
HH
LiLI
HLi
HH
HPI
,un
der
tota
lfe
edw
ater
loss
cond
ition
s
Pag
e1
of2
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
Ste
amL
ine
Rup
ture
Exc
essi
veH
eat
Tra
nsf
er/4
Com
pone
nts,
capa
city
,and
func
tion
ofem
erge
ncy
syst
ems.
ES-
401,
RE
V9
T1G
1PW
REX
AM
INA
TIO
NO
UT
LIN
EFO
RM
ES-
401-
2K
AN
AM
E/
SAFE
TY
FUN
CT
ION
:IR
Ki
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
Al
A2
A3
A4
GT
OPI
C:
RO
SR
O
056A
K3.
02L
oss
ofO
ff-s
iteP
ower
/64.
44.
7LI
LILI
LILI
LILI
LILI
LIA
ctio
nsco
ntai
ned
inE
OP
for
loss
ofof
fsite
pow
er
062A
A1
.02
Los
sof
Nuc
lear
Svc
Wat
er!
43.
23.
3[1
LILI
LIEl
flj
[1LI
Loa
dson
the
SW
Sin
the
cont
rol
room
065A
G2.
4.46
Los
sof
Inst
rum
entA
ir/
84.
24.
2[J
LILI
LILI
riLI
LIH
[]A
bilit
yto
veri
fyth
atth
eal
arm
sar
eco
nsis
tent
with
the
plan
tcon
ditio
ns.
077A
A2.
02G
ener
ator
Vol
tage
and
Ele
ctri
cG
rid
3.5
3.6
LIH
LIEl
HLI
LILI
LIfl
Vol
tage
outs
ide
the
gene
rato
rca
pabi
lity
curv
eD
istu
rban
ces/6
WE
O4E
K2,
1LO
CA
Out
side
Con
tain
men
t/3
3.5
3.9
JIj
fl[
[][j
flj
LIC
ompo
nent
san
dfu
ncti
ons
ofco
ntro
lan
dsa
fety
syst
ems,
including
inst
rum
enta
tion,
sign
als,
inte
rloc
ks,
failu
rem
odes
and
auto
mat
ican
dm
anua
lfe
atur
es.
WE
O5E
K2.
2In
adeq
uate
Hea
tT
rans
fer
-L
oss
of3.
94.
2LI
LIH
LILI
ElLI
LiH
LIfl
Faci
lity’
she
atre
mov
alsy
stem
s,in
clud
ing
prim
ary
Sec
onda
ryH
eat
Sin
k)4
—.
—co
olan
t,em
erge
ncy
cool
ant,
the
deca
yhe
atre
mov
alsy
stem
san
dre
latio
nsbe
twee
nth
epr
oper
oper
atio
nof
thes
esy
stem
sto
the
oper
atio
nof
the
faci
lity.
WE1
2EK1
.13.4
3.8L
IEl[
]LIL
ILIL
I[]f
lLI
Pag
e2
of2
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
TOPI
C:
Fuel
hand
ling
equi
pmen
tdu
ring
anin
cide
nt
Failu
reof
Con
dens
ate
air
ejec
tor
exha
ust
mon
itor
Faci
lity
cond
ition
san
dse
lect
ion
ofap
prop
riat
epr
oced
ures
duri
ngab
norm
alan
dem
erge
ncy
oper
atio
ns.
Nor
mal
,ab
norm
alan
dem
erge
ncy
oper
atin
gpr
oced
ures
asso
ciat
edw
ith(L
OC
AC
oold
own
and
Dep
ress
uriz
atio
n).
Kno
wle
dge
ofop
erat
iona
lim
plic
atio
nsof
EO
Pw
arni
ngs,
caut
ions
and
note
s.
Ope
ratin
gbe
havi
orch
arac
teri
stic
sof
the
faci
lity.
Com
pone
nts
and
func
tion
sof
cont
rol
and
safe
tysy
stem
s,in
clud
ing
inst
rum
enta
tion
,si
gnal
s,in
terl
ocks
,fa
ilure
mod
esan
dau
tom
atic
and
man
ual
feat
ures
.
ES4O
1,R
EV9
KANA
ME
/SA
FETY
FUN
CTIO
N:
T1G
2PW
REX
AM
INA
TIO
NO
UT
LIN
E
IAK
1K
2K
3K
4K
5K
6A
1A
2A
3A
4G
RO
SRO
OO
3AK
I .07
Dro
pped
Con
trol
Rod
/1
3.1
3.9
ElEl
ElEl
ElEl
ElEl
ElEl
Eff
ect o
fdr
oppe
dro
don
inse
rtio
nlim
itsan
dSD
M
FOR
ME
S-40
1-2
036A
A1
.04
Fuel
Han
dlin
gA
ccid
ent /
83.
13.
7[J
LiEl
ElEl
LI[l
ElEl
ElEl
037A
A2.
08S
team
Gen
erat
orT
ube
Lea
k/3
2.8
3.3
flEl
ElEl
ElEl
Ell]
ElEl
El
WE
O2E
A2.
1S
lTer
min
atio
n/3
3.3
4.2
Li[1
ElEl
ElEl
Ell]
ElEl
[1
WE
03E
K3.
2LO
CA
Coo
ldow
n-
Dep
ress
./
43.
43.
9[E
l[1
llEl
ElEl
ElEl
ElEl
El
weO
6EG
2.4.
20D
egra
ded
Cor
eC
ooli
ng!
43.
84.
3El
ElEl
ElEl
ElEl
ElEl
El
WE
13E
A1.
2S
team
Gen
erat
orO
ver
-pre
ssu
re!4
3.0
3.2
LIEl
ElEl
ElEl
l]El
ElEl
El
WE
14E
K2.
1L
oss
ofC
TM
TIn
tegr
ity/5
3.4
3.7
Elll
[1LI
El[1
[1El
Liii
El
WE
16E
K3.
2H
igh
Con
tain
men
tR
adia
tion
/9
2.9
3.3
UD
[1E
lEl[
iL
l[1
ElE
lN
orm
al,
abno
rmal
and
emer
genc
yop
erat
ing
proc
edur
esas
soci
ated
with
(Hig
hC
onta
inm
ent
Rad
iatio
n).
Pag
e1
of1
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
ES-
401,
REV
9T
2G1
PWR
EXA
MIN
ATI
ON
OU
TL
INE
FOR
ME
S4O
1-2
KA
NA
ME
/SA
FET
YFU
NC
TIO
N:
IR1<
1K
2K
3K
4K
5K
6A
lA
2A
3A
4G
TO
PIC
:
110
SR
O
003A
2.05
Rea
ctor
Coo
lant
Pum
p2.
52.
8U
JU
Jfl
Eff
ects
ofV
CT
pres
sure
onR
CP
seal
leak
oft
flow
s
003K
5.02
Rea
ctor
Coo
lant
Pum
p2.
83.
2fl
[]J
J[]
ULI
ElEl
[]E
ffec
tsof
RC
Pco
astd
own
onR
CS
para
met
ers
0041
<5.2
7C
hem
ical
and
Vol
ume
Con
trol
2.6
3.2
U[j
UU
UU
Ufl
flU
Rea
son
for
nitr
ogen
purg
eof
CV
CS
0051
<2.0
1R
esid
ual
Hea
tR
emov
al3.
03.
2fJ
]ILj
UEl
LIU
LIU
UU
RH
Rpu
mps
•
006A
3.08
Em
erge
ncy
Cor
eC
oolin
g4.
24.
3U
LiU
UU
UU
U[i
UU
Aut
omat
ictr
ansf
erof
EC
CS
flow
path
s
007A
3.0l
Pre
ssur
izer
Rel
ief/
Que
nch
Tan
k2.
72.
9fl
ElU
LIU
U[i
LIU
F]
Com
pone
nts
whi
chdi
scha
rge
toth
ePR
T
0081
<4.0
9C
ompo
nent
Coo
ling
Wat
er2.
72.
9U
LiU
ElU
U[1
UU
UT
hesta
nd
bfe
atur
efo
rth
eC
CW
pum
ps
OlO
K4.
02P
ress
uriz
erP
ress
ure
Con
trol
3.0
3.4
UU
UI
UU
UU
UU
UPr
even
tion
ofun
cove
ring
PZR
heat
ers
012A
101
Rea
ctor
Prot
ectio
n2.
93.
4U
UU
UU
UtI
ULi
UU
Tri
pse
tpoi
ntad
just
men
t
0121
<6.0
2R
eact
orPr
otec
tion
2.9
3.1
UU
UU
UU
UU
UU
Red
unda
ntch
anne
ls
013G
2.l.
19E
ngin
eere
dS
afet
yF
eatu
res
Act
uatio
n3.
33.
8U
UU
UU
UU
UU
UII
Abi
lity
tous
epl
ant
com
pute
rto
eval
uate
syst
emor
com
pone
ntst
atus
.
Pag
e1
of3
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
ES-
401,
REV
9T
2G1
PWR
EXA
MIN
ATI
ON
OU
TL
INE
FOR
ME
S-40
1-2
KA
NA
ME
/SA
FET
YFU
NC
TIO
N:
IRK
iK
2K
3K
4K
5K
6A
lA
2A
3A
4G
TO
PIC
:
RO
SR
O
013K
3.03
Eng
inee
red
Saf
ety
Fea
ture
sA
ctua
tion
4.3
4.7
LI[E
[1fl
H[jj
Con
tain
men
t
013K
6.O
lE
ngin
eere
dS
afet
yF
eatu
res
Act
uatio
n2.
73.
1LI
LIEl
flE
lLI
Sen
sors
and
dete
ctor
s
022A
1.03
Con
tain
men
tC
oolin
g3.
13.
4El
LIH
ElLi
LIII
LILI
LILI
Con
tain
men
thu
mid
ity
026A
4.05
Con
tain
men
tS
pray
3,5
3.5
HLI
LILI
LiLI
LILI
F]J
LIco
ntai
nmen
t spr
ayre
set
swit
ches
039A
2.04
Mai
nan
dR
ehea
tS
team
3.4
3.7
LILI
HLI
LIL
IH
ilLI
LILi
Mal
func
tioni
ngst
eam
dum
p
059G
2.2.
22M
ain
Fee
dwat
er40
4.7
LILI
LIH
HLI
LiH
HLI
Kno
wle
dge
oflim
iting
cond
ition
sfo
rop
erat
ions
and
safe
ty.
-
-lim
its.
061
K6.
0lA
uxil
iary
/Em
erge
ncy
Fee
dwat
er2.
52.
8LI
HLI
LILi
ICi
LIC]
LILI
Con
trol
lers
and
posi
tion
ers
062K
1.02
AC
Ele
ctri
cal
Dis
trib
utio
n41
4.4
CICi
LILI
LILI
LILI
HC]
EOIG
063K
1.0
3D
CE
lect
rica
lD
istr
ibut
ion
2.9
3.5
I]LI
LICI
LIL
IL]
LILI
LILI
Bat
tery
char
ger
and
batt
ery
064A
4.05
Em
erge
ncy
Die
sel
Gen
erat
or3.
13.
2LI
LILI
LILI
LILI
LI[]
LIT
rans
fer
ofE
D/G
cont
rol
betw
een
man
ual
and
auto
mat
ic
064K
103
Em
erge
ncy
Die
sel
Gen
erat
or3.
64.
0iI
LILI
HLI
LIH
LILI
LILI
—D
iese
lfu
eloi
l sup
ply
syst
em
Pag
e2
of3
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
ES-4
01, R
EV9
T2G
1PW
REX
AM
INA
TIO
NO
UTL
INE
FORM
ES-4
01-2
KA
NA
ME
/SA
FETY
FUN
CTIO
N:
IRK
iK
2K
3K
4K
5K
6A
tA
2A
3A
4G
TOPI
C:
RO
SR
O
073A
2.02
Pro
cess
Rad
iatio
nM
onito
rIng
2.7
3.2
LILI
[]LI
[1J
Det
ecto
rfa
ilure
0761
(2.0
4S
ervi
ceW
ater
2.5
2.6
[[]
[J[]
[]fl
LI[]
flR
eact
orbu
ildin
gcl
osed
cool
ing
wat
er
076K
3.05
Ser
vice
Wat
er3.
03.
2LI
LI[
flLI
[]fl
[1LI
RH
Rco
mpo
nent
s,co
ntro
ls,
sens
ors,
indi
cato
rsan
d—
ala
s,
incl
udin
gra
dm
onito
rs
0781
(4.0
2In
stru
men
tA
ir3.
23.
5H
LILI
[]LI
LIfl
LILI
LIC
ross
-ove
rto
othe
rai
rsy
stem
s
103A
3.01
Con
tain
men
t3.
94.
2LI
iiLI
LI[1
LILI
[1{i
LILI
Con
tain
men
tis
olat
ion
103K
3.01
Con
tain
men
t3.
33.
7[]
[J[]
F]F]
F]F]
F]L
oss
ofco
ntai
nmen
tin
tegr
ityun
der
shut
dow
nco
nditi
ons
Pag
e3
of3
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
ES
4O1,
RE
V9
T2G
2PW
RE
XA
MIN
AT
ION
OU
TL
INE
FOR
ME
S-4
01-2
KAN
AM
E/S
AFE
TYFU
NC
TIO
N:
IRK
iK
2K
3K
4K
5K
6A
lA
2A
3A
4G
TOPI
C:
RO
SRO
002K
5.1O
Rea
ctor
Coo
lant
3.6
4.1
LILi
Rel
atio
nshi
pbe
twee
nre
acto
rpo
wer
and
RC
Sdi
ffer
entia
lte
mpe
ratu
re
011K
2.02
Pre
ssur
izer
Lev
elC
ontr
ol3.
13.
2J
F]Li
LiLi
LiLi
LIF]j
PZR
heat
ers
015K
6.0l
Nuc
lear
Inst
rum
enta
tion
2.9
3.2
LiLi
LiLi
[3Li
LiLi
[][]
Sen
sors
,de
tect
ors
and
indi
cato
rs
01
6K
3i2
Non
-nuc
lear
Inst
rum
enta
tion
3.4
3.6
[3Li
HLi
LILi
LiLi
LILi
flSI
G
034A
2.03
Fuel
Han
dlin
gE
quip
men
t3.
34.
0Li
LiLi
LiLi
LiF]
LiLi
LIM
ispo
sitio
ned
fuel
elem
ent
035A
4.05
Ste
amG
ener
ator
3.8
4.0
LiLI
FlLi
LiLi
LILi
Li[
F]L
evel
Con
trol
toen
hanc
ena
tura
lci
rcul
atio
n
071
K4.
05W
aste
Gas
Dis
posa
l2.
73.
0Li
LiLi
[Fl
LiLi
LiF]
LiLi
Poin
t of
rele
ase
072K
1.0
4A
rea
Rad
iatio
nM
onito
ring
3.3
3,5
]Li
LiLi
LiLi
LiF]
LiLi
LiC
ontr
olro
omve
ntila
tion
079G
2.l.
23S
tabo
nA
ir-
4,3
4.4
LiLi
[1Li
Li[1
LiF]
Li[3
]A
bilit
yto
perf
orm
spec
ific
syst
eman
din
tegr
ated
plan
t....
proc
edur
esdu
ring
all
mod
esof
plan
top
erat
ion.
086A
3.03
Fire
Prot
ectio
n2.
93.
3A
ctua
tion
offir
ede
tect
ors
F]L
iLiL
ILiL
iLL
iLiL
i
Pag
e1
of1
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
ES
-401
,R
EV
9T
3PW
REX
AM
INA
TiO
NO
UT
LIN
EFO
RM
ES-
401-
2
KA
NA
ME
/SA
FET
YFU
NC
TIO
N:
IRK
i1(
2K
31(
4K
5K
6A
lA
2A
3A
4G
TO
PIC
:
RO
SR
O
Gal
.15
Con
duct
ofop
erat
ions
2.7
3.4
LiLI
flLI
LILi
LI]
Kno
wle
dge
ofad
min
istr
ativ
ere
quir
emen
tsfo
rte
mpo
rary
man
agem
ent
dire
ctiv
essu
chas
stan
ding
orde
rs,
nigh
tor
ders
,O
pera
tion
sm
emos
,et
c.
G2.
l.29
Con
duct
ofop
erat
ions
4.1
4.0
LITI
[j
LILI
[j
LIL]
LI[1
(K
now
ledg
eof
how
toco
nduc
tsy
stem
lineu
ps,
such
as-
valv
es,
brea
kers
,sw
itch
es,
etc.
G2.
l.4
3C
ondu
ctof
oper
atio
ns4.
14.
3LI
LITi
LILI
LILi
rifl
flA
bilit
yto
use
proc
edur
esto
dete
rmin
eth
eef
fect
son
reac
tivity
ofpl
ant c
hang
es
G2.
2.42
Equ
ipm
ent
Con
trol
3.9
4.6
LI[J
jA
bilit
yto
reco
gniz
esy
stem
para
met
ers
that
are
entr
y-le
vel
cond
ition
sfo
rT
echn
ical
Spe
cifi
cati
ons
G2.
2.44
Equ
ipm
ent C
ontr
ol4.
24.
4LI
LILI
LiFl
LILI
LILI
[1A
bilit
yto
inte
rpre
tco
ntro
lro
omin
dica
tions
tove
rify
the
stat
usan
dop
erat
ion
ofa
syst
em,
and
unde
rsta
ndho
wop
erat
orac
tion
san
ddi
rect
ives
affe
ctpl
ant
and
syst
emco
nditi
ons
G2.
3.l
1R
adia
tion
Con
trol
3.8
4.3
LILI
LILI
LILI
LILI
LILI
[IA
bilit
yto
cont
rol
radi
atio
nre
leas
es.
G2.
3.12
Rad
iatio
nC
ontr
ol3.
23.
7LI
LITi
LILI
TITi
LILI
LIK
now
ledg
eof
radi
olog
ical
safe
typr
inci
ples
pert
aini
ngto
lice
nsed
oper
ator
duti
es
G2.
4.27
Em
erge
ncy
Pro
cedu
res/
Pla
ns3.
43.
9LI
LILI
LILi
LiLI
LiLi
LI(]
Kno
wle
dge
of‘f
ire
inth
epl
ant’
proc
edur
es.
G2.
4.32
Em
erge
ncy
Pro
cedu
res/
Pla
ns3.
64.
0Ti
LILi
LILi
LILi
LiLI
LI]
Kno
wle
dge
ofop
erat
orre
spon
seto
loss
ofal
lan
nunc
iato
rs.
G2.
4.9
Em
erge
ncy
Pro
cedu
res/
Pla
ns3.
84.
2LI
LiLI
LI[1
LILi
LiLi
LiK
now
ledg
eof
low
pow
er/
shut
dow
nim
plic
atio
nsin
acci
dent
(e.g
.LO
CA
orlo
ssof
RH
R)
miti
gatio
nst
rate
gies
.
Pag
e1
of1
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
ES-
401,
REV
9SH
OT
1G1
PWR
EXA
MIN
A11
ON
OU
TLIN
EFO
RM
ES-
401-
2KA
NA
ME
/SA
FETY
FUN
CTI
ON
:IR
Ki
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
Al
A2
A3
A4
GTO
PIC
:R
OS
RO
008A
G2.
4.30
Pre
ssur
izer
Vap
orS
pace
Acc
iden
t /3
2.7
4.1
IJ
Kno
wle
dge
ofev
ents
rela
ted
tosy
stem
oper
atio
ns/s
tatu
sth
atm
ust
bere
port
edto
inte
rnal
orgi
niza
tions
orou
tsid
eag
enci
es.
011
EA
2.07
Lar
geB
reak
LOC
A/
33.
23.
4£1
[1flj
JJ
jJ
Tha
teq
uipm
ent
nece
ssar
yfo
rfu
nctio
ning
ofcr
itica
lpu
mp
wat
erse
als
isop
erab
le
025A
A2.
04L
oss
ofR
HR
Sys
tem
/4
3.3
3.6
Loc
atio
nan
dis
olab
ility
ofle
aks
029E
G2.
4.18
AT
WS
/1
3.3
4.0
Kno
wle
dge
ofth
esp
ecif
icbas
esfo
rE
OP
s.
056A
G2.
4.45
Los
sof
Off
-site
Pow
er!
64.
14.
3A
bilit
yto
prio
ritiz
ean
din
terp
ret
the
sign
ific
ance
ofea
chan
nunc
iato
ror
alar
m.
065A
A2.
02L
oss
ofIn
stru
men
t Air
/82.
42.
6fl
flfl
Rel
atio
nshi
pof
flow
read
ings
tosy
stem
oper
atio
n
Pag
e1
of1
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
ES-
401,
RE
V9
SRO
TiG
2PW
REX
AM
INA
TIO
NO
UT
LIN
EFO
RM
ES-
401-
2K
AN
AM
E/S
AFE
TY
FUN
CT
ION
:IR
Ki
K2
K3
K4
KS
K6
Al
A2
A3
A4
GT
OPI
C:
RD
SR
O
005A
G2.
l.7
Inop
erab
le/S
tuck
Con
trol
Rod/i
4.4
4.7
JU
ElEl
ElEl
ElU]
ElC]
Abi
lity
toev
alua
tepl
ant
perf
orm
ance
and
mak
eop
erat
iona
lju
dgm
ents
base
don
oper
atin
gch
arac
teri
stic
s,re
acto
rbe
havi
oran
din
stru
men
tin
terp
reta
tion.
076A
Ga2
.22
Hig
hR
eact
orC
oola
ntA
ctiv
ity!
94.
04.
7[]
ElEl
ElC]
U]El
ElEl
C]K
now
ledg
eof
limiti
ngco
nditi
ons
for
oper
atio
nsan
dsa
fety
limits
.
WE
O3E
A2.
1LO
GA
Coo
ldow
nD
epre
ss./4
3.4
4.2
U]El
ElF]
ElEl
LiEl
Faci
lity
cond
ition
san
dse
lect
ion
ofap
prop
riat
epr
oced
ures
duri
ngab
norm
alan
dem
erge
ncy
oper
atio
ns.
WE
O9E
A2.
2N
atur
alC
irc.
/4
3.4
3.8
U]U]
U]U]
jU]
F]U]
jU]
[1[1
Adh
eren
ceto
appr
opri
ate
proc
edur
esan
dop
erat
ion
with
inth
elim
itatio
nsin
the
faci
litys
lice
nse
and
amen
dmen
ts.
Pag
e1
of1
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
ES-
401,
REV
9S
RO
T2G
1PW
REX
AM
INA
TIO
NO
UT
LIN
EFO
RM
ES-
401-
2
KANA
ME
ISA
FET
YFU
NC
TIO
N:
JR1(
11(
2K
3K
4K
5K
6A
lA
2A
3A
4(3
TO
PIC
:
RO
SR
O
005(
32.1
.32
Res
idua
lH
eat
Rem
oval
3.8
4.0
LILI
LIC)
C)El
UCl
LI[1
Abi
lity
toex
plai
nan
dap
ply
all
syst
emlim
itsan
dpr
ecau
tion
s.
008A
2.02
Com
pone
ntC
oolin
gW
ater
3.2
3.5
LILI
LILI
LILI
LII
LILI
Hig
h/lo
wsu
rge
tank
leve
l
039(
32.2
.25
Mai
nan
dR
ehea
tS
team
3.2
4.2
LILI
F]El
LI[1
ElLI
LILI
))K
now
ledg
eof
the
bas
esin
Tec
hnic
alS
peci
fica
tion
sfo
rlim
iting
cond
ition
sfo
rop
erat
ions
and
safe
tylim
its.
062G
2.2.
44A
CE
lect
rica
lD
istr
ibut
ion
4.2
4.4
LI[1
LILI
LILI
LILI
LILI
Abi
lity
toin
terp
ret c
ontr
olro
omin
dica
tions
tove
rify
the
stat
usan
dop
erat
ion
ofa
syst
em,
and
unde
rsta
ndho
wop
erat
orac
tion
san
ddi
rect
ives
affe
ctpl
ant
and
syst
emco
nditi
ons
063A
2.02
DC
Ele
ctri
cal
Dis
trib
utio
n2.
33.
1LI
LILI
LILI
LILI
tiLI
LILI
Los
sof
vent
ilatio
ndu
ring
batte
rych
argi
ng
Pag
e1
of1
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
SR
OT
2G2
PWR
EXA
MIN
ATI
ON
OU
TL
INE
IRK
iK
2K
3K
4K
5K
6A
lA
2A
3A
40
RO
SR
O
3.3
3.8
2.9
3.7F
}flJcF
3.6
4.6
ES-
401,
REV
9
KA
NA
ME
/SA
FET
YFU
NC
TIO
N:
015A
2.04
Nuc
lear
Inst
rum
enta
tion
034A
1.02
Fuel
Han
dlin
gE
quip
men
t
086G
2.2.
37Fi
reP
rote
ctio
n
FOR
ME
S-40
1-2
TO
PIC
:
Eff
ects
onax
ial
flux
dens
ity
ofco
ntro
lro
dal
ignm
ent a
ndse
quen
cing
,xe
non
prod
uctio
nan
dde
cay,
arid
boro
nvs
.co
ntro
lro
dre
activ
itych
ange
s
Wat
erle
vel
inth
ere
fuel
ing
cana
l
Abi
lity
tode
term
ine
oper
abili
tyan
d/or
avai
labi
lity
ofsa
fety
rela
ted
equi
pmen
t
Pag
e1
of1
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
ES
-401
,R
EV9
SRO
T3
PWR
EXA
MIN
ATI
ON
OU
TL
INE
FOR
ME
S-40
1-2
KA
NA
ME
/SA
FET
YFU
NC
TIO
N:
IR1(
1K
2K
3K
4K
5K
6A
lA
2A
3A
4G
TO
PIC
:R
OS
RO
Gil
.5C
ondu
ctof
oper
atio
ns2.
93.
9F]
F]F]
F]F]
[]F]
[]F]
F]A
bilit
yto
loca
tean
dus
epr
oced
ures
rela
ted
tosh
ift
stal
ling
,su
chas
min
imum
crew
com
plem
ent,
over
time
limita
tions
,et
c.
G2.
2.15
Equ
ipm
ent
Con
trol
3.9
43
F][1
[3[3
[3[3
F][3
F][3
Abi
lity
tode
term
ine
the
expe
cted
plan
tco
nfig
urat
ion
usin
gde
sign
and
conf
igur
atio
nco
ntro
ldo
cum
enta
lon
G2.
2.20
Equ
ipm
ent
Con
trol
2.6
3.8
F]F]
F]F]
[7F]
F][7
[3[3
Kno
wle
dge
ofth
epr
oces
sfo
rm
anag
ing
trou
bles
hoot
ing
.
-..
activ
ities
.
G2.
3.4
Rad
iatio
nC
ontr
ol3.
23.
7F]
F]F]
F]F]
F]F]
[1F]
[3[]
Kno
wle
dge
ofra
diat
ion
expo
sure
limits
unde
rno
rmal
and
emer
genc
yco
nditi
ons
G2.
3.7
Rad
iatio
nC
ontr
ol3.
53.
6F]
F][3
[3F]
[7[3
F][3
F]A
bilit
yto
com
ply
with
radi
atio
nw
ork
perm
itre
quir
emen
tsdu
ring
norm
alor
abno
rmal
cond
ition
s
G2.
4.29
Em
erge
ncy
Pro
cedu
res/
Pla
ns3.
14.
4F]
[F]
F]Li
F]F]
LiF]
F]J
Kno
wle
dge
ofth
eem
erge
ncy
plan
.
G2.
4.40
Em
erge
ncy
Pro
cedu
res/
Pla
ns2.
74.
5[3
F]F]
[7F]
F]F]
F]F]
F]K
now
ledg
eof
the
SR
Os
resp
onsi
bili
ties
inem
erge
ncy
plan
impl
emen
tatio
n.
Pag
e1
of1
7/20
/201
28:
43A
M
Vogtle 05000 2013-301
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401 -4
G:\OLExams\Vogtle Examinations\Initial Exams\Initial Exam 2013-30 1\QA documents\Vogtle 2013-301 ES-40 1-4Record of Rejected KAs( 1-25-2013) Revision 1 .doc
Tier / Randomly Reason for RejectionGroup Selected K/A
1 / 1 065AA2.02 Vogtle 1 & 2 has no plant or controsi room FLOW readingsassociated with Instrument Air
has been replacedwith RSBaldwin Friday, January 25, 20 3
065AA2.05 .KA reselected to 065AA2,05
2 I 2 072K 1.04 Vogtle 1 & 2 Control Room Ventilation only deals with processRad Monitors. Current KA is Area Rad Monitor. The Control Roomhas been replaced
. area has an ARM, but it has no cause-effect relationship (alarmwithonly).
072K 1.04. has been . -
. RSBaldwin, Friday, January 2, 201jreplaced with
0771<1 03KA reselected 072K 1.04.
RSBaldwin, Tuesday. February 05, 2013
K072K 103
3 G2.4.32 Vogtle 1 & 2 has no response guidance to a loss of all annunciatorsfor operators in the Emergency Procedures or Plan. Only thinghas been replacedassociated is the Emergency Classification for SROs.withRSBaldwin. Friday. January 25, 2013
G 2.4.39Ci 2.4.39
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-4016
Facility: Vogtle 1 & 2 Date of Exam: 5110/13 Exam Level: RD El SRO El
Initial
Item Description a 4i L.1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. .j_ 2!2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions. k / jiP
b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. _jj W
3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401
4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RD or 2 SRO questions wererepeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR CL program office). —
5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below(check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; orthe audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; orthe examinations were developed independently; orthe licensee certifies that there is no duplication; orother (explain)
6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified Newfrom the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the restnew or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only RD 22 RD 20 RD 33 c4 (,\question distribution(s) at right. (29.3%) I (26.7%)I (44%)! J V
SRO6 SRD3 SRO16(24%) j) — (64%) —
7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions Memory C/Aon the RD exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 RD 35 (46.7%) / RD 40 (53.3%) /percent if the randomly selected K/As supportthe higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO 11 (44%) SRO 14 (56%)SRO question distribution(s) at right. —
8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. W9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination
outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. —
10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correctand agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
Printed Name / Si nature Date
a. Author 53 13b. Facility Reviewer (*) (‘14fM’lLic4r /c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Vtt-O
d. NRC Regional Supervisor — C—
Note: * The facility reviewer’s initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column ‘c’; chief examiner concurrence required.
-,
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
—1.
2.3.
Psy
chom
etricF
laws
4.Jo
bC
onten
tF
laws
5.O
ther
6.7.
LO
KL
OD
(F/H
)(1-5)
_____________________________
_______________________
_________
UIE
/SE
xplan
ation
Stem
Cu
esT
/FJo
b-
Minutia
#1B
ack-
Q=
SR
O
—
—F
ocu
sL
inkunits
ward
K/A
Only
Vogtle
20
13
45
Day
Subm
ittal
RE
VIE
WR
eceiv
ed
2-2
2-2
01
3
Instru
ctions
[Refer
toS
ection
Dof
ES
-401an
dA
pp
end
ixB
forad
ditio
nal
information
regard
ing
eachof
the
following
con
cepts.]
1.E
nter
the
levelof
know
ledge
(LO
K)
ofeach
questio
nas
either
(F)u
nd
amen
talor
(H)igher
cognitiv
elevel.
2.E
nter
the
levelof
difficulty(L
OD
)of
eachquestio
nusin
ga
1—
5(easy
—difficult)
ratingscale
(questio
ns
inth
e2
—4
rang
eare
acceptab
le).
3.C
heck
the
appro
priate
boxif
apsy
chom
etricflaw
isidentified:
$T
he
stemlack
ssu
fficient
focu
sto
elicitth
eco
rrectan
swer
(e.g.,
un
clearintent,
more
information
isneed
ed,
orto
om
uch
need
lessinform
ation).$
The
stemor
distracto
rsco
ntain
cues
(i.e.,clu
es,sp
ecificd
etermin
ers,phrasin
g,
length,etc).
$T
he
answ
erch
oices
area
collectio
nof
un
relatedtru
e/falsestatem
ents.
$T
he
distracto
rsare
no
tcred
ible;
single
imp
lausib
led
istractors
should
be
repaired
,m
ore
than
one
isu
naccep
table.
$O
ne
orm
ore
distracto
rsis
(are)partially
correct
(e.g.,
ifthe
app
licant
canm
ake
un
statedassu
mp
tion
sth
atare
notco
ntrad
ictedby
stem).
Check
the
app
rop
riatebox
ifa
job
con
tent
error
isidentified:
$T
he
questio
nis
notlinked
toth
ejob
requirem
ents
(i.e.,th
eq
uestio
nhas
avalid
K/A
but,as
written,
isnot
op
erational
inco
nten
t).$
The
questio
nreq
uires
the
recallof
know
ledge
that
isto
osp
ecificfor
the
closed
reference
testm
ode
(i.e.,it
isnot
requ
iredto
be
known
fromm
emory
).$
The
questio
nco
ntain
sd
ataw
ithan
unrealistic
levelof
accuracy
orin
con
sistent
units(e.g
.,p
anel
meter
inp
ercent
with
qu
estion
ing
allon
s).$
The
questio
nreq
uires
reverse
logicor
app
lication
com
pared
toth
ejo
breq
uirem
ents.
5.C
heck
gu
estion
sth
atare
samp
ledfor
confo
rman
cew
ithth
eap
pro
ved
K/A
and
those
that
ared
esign
atedS
RO
-only(K
/Aan
dlicen
selevel
mism
atches
areu
naccep
table).
Based
onth
erev
iewer’s
judgm
ent,
isth
equestio
nas
written
(U)n
satisfactory
(requiringrep
airor
replacem
ent),
inn
eedof
(E)ditorial
enhan
cemen
t,or
(S)atisfacto
ry?
7.A
ta
minim
um,
explainan
y“U
”ratin
gs
(e.g.,
howth
eA
pp
end
ixB
psy
cho
metric
attributes
arenot
bein
gm
et).
1.2.
3.P
sych
om
etricF
laws
4.Jo
bC
onten
tF
laws
5.O
ther
6.7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
(F/H
)(1-5)
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred
.P
artialJo
b-
Minutia
#1B
ack-
Q=
SR
OU
IE/S
Explan
ation
Fo
cus
Dist.
Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
Generic
Co
mm
en
ts
1.T
he
reference
information
pro
vid
edfor
EA
CH
questio
nhas
tob
eincluded
with
eachquestio
n.
Additionally
eachq
uestio
nhas
tob
ein
anote
bo
ok
with
labeled
dividers.A
lson
eedto
hav
ean
electronic
cop
yof
the
same
material
onC
Ds.
We
canno
longer
accept
thum
bdriv
es.
__
___
_____
___
_____
___
_____
___
_____
__
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
12.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)
__
__
__
__
_
——
—
__
__
_
——
—U
/E/S
Explanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
QS
RO
Focus
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
1.2.
3._Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.S
pecificreference
material
providedhas
tobe
highlightedso
theexam
inercan
findthe
appropriateportions
thatare
pertinentto
thequestions.
This
iscrucial
when
numerous
pag
esare
providedand
partof
thepertinent
referencesare
scatteredthroughout
them
aterial.3.
Each
questionhas
tobe
identifiedas
NE
W,
Modified
orB
ankand
where
itwas
usedif
itwas
notN
EW
.4.
KA
valuefor
eachR
Oand
SR
Oquestion
needsto
beadded
tothe
questions.
E)02K
5.1O,
Difference
between
Rx
Pow
erand
Delta
T.N
ew,
1.S
tandardizationof
stem.
Isit
necessary
tostate
infirst
bullet“based
onall
indications?”T
hisis
notnecessary.
Rem
ovethis
orm
akesure
thisis
thew
ayyou
want
tow
riteit.
2.T
eachingin
theS
tem.
The
stemprovides
theapplicants
thatan
RT
Dfailing
hiw
illprovide
theindications.
Isthis
necessary.C
anyou
juststate
thatthe
following
indicationsare
received.H
3X
This
inthe
stemso
itdo
esnot
haveto
app
earhere.
3.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.
)uestionis
satisfactory.Ju
stneed
tofix
minor
comm
entsabove.
.pril1,
2013
man
ges
doneok
asis.
03A2.05,
New
,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pearsto
match
.2.
What
isthe
purposeof
puttingthe
time
forthe
initialconditions?
2H
3T
hereare
noadditional
times
inthe
question.M
ostlikely
this‘
shouldbe
deleted.D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
..
3.M
odifydistractor
Dto
readN
OT
change.4.
Question
appears
tobe
Ok.
\prill,2
013
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
#1B
ack-Q
=S
RO
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
)O3A
K1.07,
New
,H
igher
1K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Iamnot
surethat
allthe
Loop
Delta
Tinform
ationis
necessary
toansw
erthis
question.C
ouldyou
remove
allthat
andjust
askw
hathappens
duringa
droppedrod?
Itseems
thisw
ouldbe
more
straightforw
ard.H
avelicensee
explainw
hythis
information
isnecessary
tohave
inthe
question.3.
The
unitin
theL
oopD
eltaT
ispercent,
isthis
corrector
shouldit
bed
egrees
F?
4.T
heansw
eron
thequestion
isidentified
asdistractor
Chow
everon
theansw
erexplanation
theansw
eris
identifiedas
distractorB.
Which
oneis
itB
orC
?5.
Licensee
hasto
lookat
thisquestion
andm
akesure
theansw
erdescription
matches
theansw
er.It
lookslike
theansw
ersdescription
does
notm
atchthe
same
order.SD
Mthen
RIL.
No
correctansw
erand
thereforean
unsatquestion.
pril1,2
013
1.A
ddedthe
reactorrem
ainedat
power.
2.R
anon
simulator
Q#
LOK
(F/H)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Q#
6.
U/E
/S
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Q=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
LO
K(F/H
)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Focus
Cues
T/F
Cred.
Dist.
Partial
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s
Job-Link
Minutia
7.
Explanation
5.O
ther6.
7.
U/E
/SE
xplanation
3H
2-3x
x
J
OK
asis.
ES
-4
01
,R
ev.
9W
ritten
Exam
ination
Review
Worksheet
Form
ES
-40
1-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
__________________________
______________________
__
__
__
__
_
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#L
OK
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
103K5.02,
Bank,
Mem
ory
1.T
heinform
ationprovided
will
requirethe
applicantto
determine
what
percentR
xpow
erthe
plantis
at.D
oesthis
information
provideddo
this?A
sklicensee
toexplain
howthe
applicantit
requiredto
determine
thisinform
ation.2.
Inthe
stemof
thesecond
questionteaching
isnoted
becau
seyou
statethat
“Following
theR
CP
tripand
thecoast
down
Why
isit
necessary
tostate
thecoastdow
n?N
otsure
thatitis
necessary
tosay
flowlow
ers,Iw
ouldim
aginethat
youcan
justuse
“Following
theR
CP
trip,the
DN
BR
will
___
___
.“
Discuss
with
licensee.3.
Need
toadd
todistractors
Aand
Bthe
nounnam
efor
procedure12004-C
.4.
Have
licenseediscuss
theinfo
ontop
ofthe
question.W
hatdoes
AM
Lm
ean?
Make
enh
ancem
ents
New
sas
discussedabove.
pril1,
2013
1.S
houldknow
theyare
at3
percentpow
er.2.
Rem
ovedfrom
stemcoastdow
n.3.
AM
Lm
eansA
llanL
owe.
4.IN
mode
1but
thecrew
isin
MO
DE
2.T
hisis
thew
aythe
proceduresread.
4F
3
E
x
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
Di
——
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.IPaiaIJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
=S
RO
U/E
/SE
xplanationF
ocu
sjD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
04K
5.2
7,
NE
W,
Mem
ory,R
easonfor
N2purge.
KA
do
esm
atch.H
ydrazineis
NO
Ta
plausibledistractor.
Itis
aliquid
andw
elldoes
notget
purged.A
tleast
Idon’tbelieve
itdoes.A
tsom
eplants
them
ainturbine
generatoris
purgedw
ithC
O2
would
thisbe
aplausible
distractor?D
iscussthe
plausibilityof
hydrazine.3.
Tw
onon-plausible
distractorsm
akesthis
questionan
UN
SAT
question.5
F2
XX
XX
4.A
ddto
thestem
theprocedure
thatthis
questionis
associated‘-
with.
Add
lAW
13007-1,“V
CT
Gas
Control
andR
CS
Chem
icalC
ontrol.”
Evaluated
asunsat
pril1
,2013
1.S
ome
validator’sm
issedand
usedhydrazine.
.-
2.C
hangeis
ok.
05K2.01,
New
,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.6
H2-3
2.A
ppearsquestion
isO
k.
pril1,
2013
--_
__
__
J1.
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-4
01
,R
ev.
9W
ritten
Exam
ination
Review
Worksheet
Form
ES
-4
01
-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.L
OK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
____________________________________________________
_________
UIE
ISE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
QS
RO
Focus
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D—
r—T
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.JP
aia
lJob-
IMinutia
#/B
ack-Q
ISR
OU
/EIS
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
LinkJ
unitsw
ardK
/Ajonly
E06A
3.08,N
ew,
Higher.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
What
isgoing
onw
iththe
testvalves
arein
TE
ST
?D
ow
eneed
toadd
tothe
stemW
HY
these
valvesare
inthis
position?S
eems
tom
eitdoes.
Discuss
with
licensee3.
Seq
uen
ceof
eventsdoes
notm
akesen
sein
thatduring
aL
argebreak
LO
CA
RW
STsw
itchindications
areas
stated,this
doesnot
readw
ell.P
leasew
ordsm
ithto
geta
betterpicture
onw
hatis
happening.4.
Nothing
onthe
referencem
aterialw
ashighlighted.
When
material
ispresented
inthis
manner
theevaluator
hasto
lookat
7H
23
everythingpresented
ratherthan
thosekey
items.
Highlighting
these
items
makes
thereview
easier.W
ithoutthe
highlightsit
takeslonger
toreview
thequestion.
Make
chan
ges
toquestion,
—I
pril1
,2O
13
1.L
ightsindicate
thatthe
swap
overcan
occur.‘
2.O
Klicensee
explainedhow
thisw
orks.T
hism
akessen
senow
.N
othinghas
tobe
changed.S
3.C
hangethe
28%on
thetest
to26%
toensure
thatthe
licenseeapplicants
donot
thinkthe
stroketim
ew
ouldnot
interferew
iththe
time
thesignal
comes
in.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.
LOK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
__
__
__
__
_
——
__
__
__
——
——
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
QS
RO
Focus
Linkunits
ward
KJA
Only
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
——
——
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
)07A3.O
1,N
ew,
Mem
ory,A
utoops
ofP
RT
S,
monitor.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
The
questionasks
them
aximum
pressurein
thePR
T.
It doesnot
clarifybefore
orafter
theP
RT
rupturedisk
failure.Ibelieve
itnecessary
toclarify
thisso
theapplicant
does
notthink
them
axpressure
is0
psigw
hichw
ouldbe
afterthe
rupturedisk
failure.D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
3.Is
therea
RH
Rdischarge
reliefvalve?
There
was
noindication
thatone
exists,how
ever,Ibelieve
thereis
one.D
ocumentation
didnot
identifyif there
was
oneand
didnot
identifyw
hatthe
Ep
ressure
forrelief
is.D
iscussusing
oneof
thosenum
bersif
available.D
istractorplausibility
comes
intoplay
if thereis
not
8F
2-3x
oneor
iftherelief
valvepressure
islots
different.
Discuss
with
licensee.
pril1,
2013
I1.
There
isa
suctionrelief
valve.W
illnot
needthe
valvenum
bers.2.
Okasis.
3.S
uctionis
450psig
anddischarge
is600
psig.S
)Kas
was
changed.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
Stem
Cues
TIEF
ocus#1
Back-
Q=
SR
Ounits
ward
K/A
Only
007EK
1.02,M
emory
Question
3also
dealsw
ithSD
M.
This
couldbe
usedto
helpansw
erthis
question.N
eedto
revieww
ithlicensee
toverify
nooverlap
ofknow
ledge.2.
Do
notbelieve
anyonew
illm
issthis
question.R
ealizingthis
isan
important
topicbut
allapplicants
knowthat
aSD
Mis
requiredafter
aR
xtrip
andE
mergency
borationis
requiredonly
ifthereis
more
thanone
rodstuck
inthe
core.O
NE
SR
Om
issedthis
question.3.
The
requirement
forE
borationis
onS
tep7
of190001-C
,“R
eactorT
ripR
esponse,”as
pointedout
inthe
referencem
aterialand
isa
stepthat
everyR
Oand
SR
Oapplicant
would
come
intoplay
with
onalm
ostevery
scenario.M
emory
requirements.
/erifyno
overlapw
ithlicensee
\pril1
,20
13
1.N
ooverlap
hasbeen
identified.2.
Tw
oor
more
stuckrods
requirese
boration.3.
Standard
TS.
OK
asis.
DO
8AG
2.4.02,M
emory,
Bank
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Reference
material
providednot
marked
up.T
hereare
noreference
setpoints
onhere
toverify
answer.
Logic
documents
arealm
osttoo
small
toread.
3.W
asthis
runon
theS
imulator
toensure
theansw
eris
correct?4.
It would
bea
hardtask
todeterm
ineif distractors
Aand
Bare
correctin
that,the
answer
isbased
ondifferent
parameters
andis
avariable
setpoint.
Because
ofthis
Idonot
believeth
ese
Q#
LOK
(F/H)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther
Job-Link
Minutia
6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
1.2.
3._Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesTIE
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OU
IE/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
9F
2-3
11
10F
2-3X
X
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Job-M
inutia#1
JBack
-Q
SR
OLink
un
itsjw
ardK
/AO
nly
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etric_Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
—1
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dt.k_
utsw
dK
h
areplausible.
Discuss
with
licensee.5.
Inthe
questionstem
,em
phasizethe
word
FIRST
,do
esnot
matter
how,
allcaps,
underline,highlighted,
etc..I just
want
toinsure
thatthe
applicantsdo
notM
ISSthe
word,
April
1,2013
1.R
anon
simulator,
2.L
icenseechanged
thequestion
becau
seagreed
itwas
hardto
exactlyfigure
outthe
setpoint.3.
The
answers
arechanged
toT
wo
RC
Ps
with
underfrequencyor
Sundervoltage.
Replaced
question..
jN
ewquestion
P-7
isblocked.
)KA
5changed.
l08K4.09,
Bank,
Higher,
E1.
KA
app
earsto
match.
2.S
temof
questionis
confusing.C
urrentseq
uen
ceof
events.Just
stateFollow
ingthe
sequ
ence
ofevents:”
3.R
emove
CO
RR
EC
TL
Yfrom
stem(generic
comm
ent).
11H
2-34.
Idonot
believethat
distractorA
isplausible.
Iwould
rathersee
ON
LY
CC
Wpum
p#
3is
running.5.
Also
inthe
stemIbelieve
thelastw
ordshould
beseq
uen
cernot
sequence.L
icenseetake
alook.
nhan
cemen
tsneed
tobe
made.
1.C
hangesm
ade-
OK
aschanged
Lpril
1,2013
Q#
LOK
(F/H)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Focus
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s
Cues
T/F
5.O
ther6.
7.
U/E
/SE
xplanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.
LOK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
—
__
__
__
__
__
——
__
__
__
——
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
TIF
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
[S
RO
Focus
Linkunits
ward
K/A
[Only
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D—
——
r—T
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.IP
aia
lJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
ISRO
U/E
/SE
xplanationF
ocusD
ist.jLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
O9EA
1.04,
New
,H
igher.SM
LO
CA
CV
CS
OP
S
E1.
Reference
material
providedd
oes
notsufficient
information
tosee
howthis
works.
Will
havelicensee
explainthis
duringprep
week
orduring
theexam
discussions.W
illcom
eback
tothis
—after
allquestions
havebeen
evaluated.
42.
Ten
sesin
theInitial
conditionsare
mixed,
Has
occurred,has
enteredW
ILLN
OT
.S
houldthis
bew
ouldnot
ordid
not?
12H
3X
J(D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
3.N
exttim
eplease
adda
simple
oneline
diagramto
helpw
ithsystem
reviewand
understanding.S
4.In
thestem
shouldthe
word
“observe”be
changedto
“verify?”W
ouldthis
beclearer?
Discuss
with
licensee.
\pril1,
2013
1.T
enseissu
efixed
,seeexam
.2.
OB
SE
RV
Eis
thew
ayit
hasto
be.O
Kas
is.
)10K4.02,
Bank,
Higher
(Farley
2004)
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Question
app
earsok
3.R
emove
correctly4.
Can
we
useO
Nversus
energized?I believe
thatthis
would
13H
2-3E
helpw
ithreading
theansw
ers.W
Edon’t
usede-energized
when
theyare
off.M
ayhave
touse
turnedon
vsjust
on!5.
Stem
canbe
shortenedto
remove
“Based
onthe
currentconditions.”
At
leastIthink
thatw
ouldm
akeit
readbetter.
Discuss
with
licensee.6.
Underline
orbold
orsom
ehowidentify
theN
Oin
“nooperator
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
LO
KL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)
__
__
__
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q’
SR
O
Fo
cus
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
sJob
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
(F/H)
(1-5)S
tem‘C
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
actions.
Thange
thestem
to:“A
ssuming
.op
era
tor
actions,w
hichone
ofthe
ollowing
(VV
OO
TF)describes
thecurrent
pressurizerheater
status.”O
r•om
ethinglike
above.
pril
1,2
01
3
1.JA
wants
NO
capitalizedin
stem.
“Assum
eN
Oo
perato
r.
S2.
Rem
ovedautom
aticallyfrom
distractor.3.
Also
removed
turned,also
made
ittoread
easier.4.
Changed
droppedto
lowers.
)Kas
changed.
E11
EK
2.02,B
ankH
igher(V
GT
2009)
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Printsw
ereprovided
however,
nothingw
ashighlighted
andtherefore
hardto
decipher.3.
The
lineupinitially
isnot
well
defined.A
ddto
secondbullet
usingthe
“B”R
HR
pump.
4.Is
itn
ecessaryto
addto
thestem
theinform
ationconcerning
th€procedure
currentlyin
progress?A
ddto
stemthey
are
14H
3perform
ingstep
sof
ES
-i.3,
“Transfer
toC
oldL
eg
1R
ecirculation.”
\pril1,2
013
1.D
eletebullet
thatstates,
allother
components
arefunctioning
properly.
)kas
changed.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.
LOK
LO
D(F
/H
)(1
-5
)—
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
—
__________
——
——
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
QS
RO
Focus
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
[5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-I
QS
RO
U/E
/SE
xplanationF
ocusD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
11K2.02,
Higher,
Modified
fromH
L15
Audit.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Question
meets
modified
requirements.
15H
2-3S
Question
issatisfactory.
\pril1,
2013
41.
Rem
ovedall
otherequipm
entas
previousquestion.
,)k
aschan
ged
.
)12A1.01,
Mem
ory,M
odified,(W
CO
9)E
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Inthe
stemis
itpossible
torem
ovethe
teachingand
juststate
-“an
inadvertentdilution
occurred.”D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
No
furtherch
ang
esnecessary.
16F
2-3‘
)uestionw
illbe
satifsuggestion
ism
ade.
pril1,
2013
1.C
hangedas
requestedrem
ovedthe
teaching.2.
What
aboutrods,
arethey
inautom
atic.O
rrods
inm
anual?3.
Added
Rods
inM
AN
UA
L.
.)k
asm
odified.
12K6.02,
Bank,
Higher.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Isit
necessary
tostate
thatall
otherequipm
entstarted
17H
3S
correctly?D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
Question
isS
atisfactory.
pril1
,20
13
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Job-M
inutiaLink
#1B
ack-Q
SR
Ounits
ward
K/A
Only
2.3._P
sychometric_F
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkjunits
ward
K/A
Only
1.N
oit
isnot
necessary
2.C
apitalizeboth,
BO
TH
,in
distractorsB
andD
.3.
Rem
ovedL
owsteam
linepressure.
Teaching,
soitdoes
not‘
affectother
questions.
)Kas
changed.M
adethe
steamclearer
E/U
)13G2.1.19,
New
,M
emory
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Initialconditions
havethe
word
NO
Tand
itis
incaps
onceand
small
lettersthe
secondtim
e.Is
therea
reasonitw
asw
rittendifferently?
Use
allcap
seach
time
butbe
consistentw
ithall
questions.3.
What
do
esthe
word
“available”m
eanin
thecontext
ofthe
question?W
illthe
applicantsunderstand
what
youare
tryingto
18F
2X
Xconvey?
Discuss.
Does
thism
eanN
OT
lighted?.
4.D
istractorsB
andD
,second
part,do
notap
pear
tobe
plausibleitdoes
notseem
reasonablethat
theapplicants
would
notknow
where
these
indicationsare
NO
Tavailable
onthe
computer.
Identifya
casew
herethe
lightsare
ON
LY
onthe
main
control.
board.L
ookat
thisduring
prepw
eekto
seehow
thecrew
.actually
doesthe
evaluation.::
5.Inform
ationprovided
do
esnot
helpin
understandingthe
answer
tothe
questionasked.
Having
annunciatorw
indows
fromthe
Q#
LOK
(F/H)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Focus
Cues
T/F
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
—
__________
——
——
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3.
Psychom
etric_Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.L
OK
LO
D—
_____
—
___
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
I#1
Back-
QS
RO
UIE
/SE
xplanationF
ocusD
ist.Link
lunitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
computer
printoutand
pictureof
theannunciator
cubeon
thecontrol
boarddoes
nothelp
explainanything.
-6.
Discuss
with
licenseew
hatthe
expectationsare
ofthe
RO
andS
RO
inthis
area.
3eta
betterunderstanding
ofw
hatis
beingasked
andw
hatis
requiredS
knowledge.
pril
1,2013
1.S
truckthe
storytelling.
Got
ridof
thisinform
ation.2.
FWI,
CV
I,do
notappear.
3.D
oesR
ES
ET
needto
bein
caps?
YE
S.
313K3.03,
New
,m
emory,
1.K
Aap
pearsto
2.In
thisquestion
youstate
LO
CA
inother
questionsyou
statelarge
breakL
OC
A.
Should
thisbe
standardizedso
tonot
cuethe
applicantsinto
aspecific
sizeand
thereforea
cannedresp
onse?
Discuss
3.D
istractorsC
andD
arenot
plausible.4.
The
2nd
partof
thequestion
isstates
“highercontainm
ent
19F
2xx
pressure,”how
ever,the
basisin
thequestion
speak
sto
temperature.
Discuss
with
licensee.5.
This
isa
TS
basisquestion,
Okw
ithlicensee.
Make
sureto
askthe
Ops
representative.W
illw
ehave
anO
psrep
duringthe
examprep
week?
Who
isthe
Ops
rep?
INeed
toreview
andrew
orkor
replace.
pril
1,2
013
•1
1.S
lowsp
eedto
protectthe
motors.
2.ST
ILL
need
sw
ork.N
eedto
revisit.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
Q#
LOK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
____________________________________________________
_________
UIFJS
Explanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
15.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
pril
3,2013
1.S
eeN
umber
19question.
Very
in-depthrew
ording.
S2.
NE
Wquestion
isvery
good.,
300D
Question.
)13K6.01,
Modified,
Mem
.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Does
No
operatoraction
takenm
eanthat
thebistables
arenot
by
passed
?3.
Question
satisfactory.
20F
2-3S
pril1
,20
13
1.Y
esit is
NO
actionat
all.2.
Changed
torem
oveH
I-1
andH
i-3and
insertedSI
and.
Containm
entS
pray.
)Kis
better.
II5AK
3.01,M
emory,
Bank,
Farley,2007
1.N
eedto
addthe
procedurebeing
usedto
startthis
thirdR
CP
likethe
initialquestion
uses.2.
Why
arethe
second
partsall
different?C
anyou
notuse
two
21F
2-3xx
iuansw
ersand
swap
orw
ouldthat
make
anadditional
answer?
3.F
ailurem
echanism,
notsure
howthe
material
referencesthis
andw
hatthe
lessonm
aterialstates.
This
do
esnot
seemto
bea
failurem
echanism.
Discuss
with
licenseeto
understand.,
4.T
hisseem
slike
it couldbe
aseries
ofT
rueand
False
questions.
p..:
Could
we
useanti-reverse
rotationdevice
pawis
areengaged.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
Form
ES-401
-9
2.3._P
sychometric_F
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
MinutiaI
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkju
nits
ward
K/A
Only
5.R
ecomm
endto
changeto
a2
by2
inboth
topand
bottom.
But
notnecessary.
\pril1,
2013
s1.
Changes,
okw
ithversion
2.2.
Ok
aschanged,
seethe
examfor
totalchanges.
--_------
)15K6.01,
Mem
ory,B
ank—
LOR
Q
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Question
isOk
22F
2-3S
3.N
och
ang
esn
ecessary
pril
1,2013
1.O
kasis,
016K3.12,
mem
ory,N
ew,
U1.
KA
appears
tom
atch.2.
Distractors
A,
Band
Care
notplausible
inthat
FEE
Dw
ateris
digitaland
everysingle
instrument
will
beselected
outby
thesystem
andw
illN
OT
cause
achange
inS
Gparam
eters.3.
Fixdistractors.
23F
2u
estion
evaluatedas
unsat.
ril1,
2013
JJ1.
New
instruments
areN
OT
indigital
feedw
ater.T
hisw
asjust
asbad,
thisis
justas
bad2.
Sw
appedtw
ofrom
originalto
2of
thenew
andthe
newquestion
ism
uchbetter.
Kas
changed.
LO
K(F/H
)Q
#2.
LO
D(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
LOK
(F/H)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
I—
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temIC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Fo
cus!
Dist.
Linku
nits!
ward
K/A
Only
‘22A.103,
Higher,
Mod
HL
-14
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Original
questionnot
provided.3.
Norm
allyT
Sallow
ancesare
abovethe
lineand
onehour
orE
/Uless.
The
TS
sprovided,
containment
pressurehas
a1
hourT
S.C
ontainment
temperature,
does
nothave
a1
hourT
Sand
isasking
forthe
Tem
pA
verage,O
perationsR
epresentativeto
VE
RIFY
fromO
PS
MG
Tthat
thisknow
ledgeis
EX
PE
CT
ED
RO
knowledge
atV
ogtle.4.
Why
canit
notbe
arguedthat
thereis
nocorrect
answer
andthat
thestem
statesthat
thetem
pincrease
isslow
lyand
thereis
noreal
reasonto
startthe
additionalC
oolingU
nitsas
suggestedin
theansw
erof
distractorsB
andD
.
24H
35.
The
temperatures
providedin
thestem
aredifferent
instruments
fromth
ose
listedin
theA
RP.
Will
thism
akea
differenceas
tow
hatcau
sedthe
hightem
pA
RP
alarmto
come
in.T
2505is
reading123
deg
rees,120
isthe
setpoint
however,
thereis
nocorresponding
instrument
fromw
hatI can
tellw
ouldread
high.Is
therea
correlationbetw
eenthe
steminstrum
entsand
theinstrum
entson
theA
RP
(arethey
inthe
same
area.)A
nylittle
pointifan
applicantgets
thisw
rongcould
cause
thequestion
tobe
deleted.D
iscussabove
with
licensee.
-
1.C
hangedset
point.T
o119.7
degf.
2.U
sethe
secondversion.
3.O
kas
changed.
Q#
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
Job-Link
Minutia
6.
U/E
/S
#/B
ack-Q
SR
Ounits
ward
K/A
Only
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
LOK
(F/H)
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7
Q#
LO
KL
OD
I—
——
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temIC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
IE/S
Explanation
Focu
sjD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
D22A
A2.01,
Higher,
Mod-H
L-16,
1.K
AD
OE
SN
OT
app
earto
match.
TH
EK
Aasks
theapplicant
todeterm
ineif a
chargingline
leakexists.
The
questionask
sthe
applicantto
determine
if acharging
lineleak
existsand
theansw
eris
it doesnot
exist.T
hereforethe
KA
doesnot
match.
2.W
hilethe
licenseeprovided
partsof
theP&
lDs
asim
pleone
linediagram
shouldhave
alsobe
:provided
soeasier
understandingof
theentire
systemto
.facilitate
afaster
review.
25H
2-3X
XX
3.D
iscussw
ithother
examiners
todeterm
ineifthis
doesnot
match.
jtkpril1,
2013
J1.
New
questionnow
matches
KA
.2.
View
chan
ges
onexam
,D
was
changedto
havea
chargingline
,:-.
breakdow
nstream
ofthe
Regenerative
heatexchanger.
3.S
ub
seta
andD
.4.
Added
“the”on
Band
C.
5.O
Kas
changed.
D25A
G2.4.21,
New
,H
igher,
Vednesday,
March
13,2013
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch
26H
3X
XU
2.D
istractorA
isnot
plausible.W
hilethe
actionof
stoppingthe
draindow
nis
plausible,the
nonaction
ofw
aitingfor
levelto
stabilizedoes
notm
akesen
seb
ecause
nothingw
asdone
tocau
selevel
tostabilize.
You
couldstop
thepum
pand
seeif
——
——
——
——
——
CS
FS
Tturns
green.A
ddto
stopcavitation
ifyouleave
itin
D.
Q#
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
TIEF
ocus
5.O
ther6.
UIE
IS
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
LOK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
——
__
__
__
——
—U
/E/S
Explanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutiaI#1
Back-
QS
RO
Focus
LinkLju
nits
ward
KIA
Only
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D—
r—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FI C
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
I SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
jD
ist.L
inkiunits
ward
K/A
jOnly
3.D
istractorD
,the
answer,
isthe
onlydistractor
thatstates
...to
stopcavitation.
Isthis
information
tostop
cavitationnecessary
?
4.D
istractorC
does
notseem
plausiblebecau
sethere
isO
NL
Y1
footfrom
the188
valuelisted
inthe
distractor.C
anthe
valuein
thestem
beincreased
to200
orsom
ethinglike
thatso
theaction
toreduce
draindow
nhas
time
totake
place?C
anthere
bea
valueto
which
thedrain
down
isreduced
like50%
?S
othe
actiontaken
would
havean
effect.
•w
aythis
questionis
written
itseems
thatthere
arenum
erousissues
‘yeach
distractoris
notplausible.
Discuss
with
BC
andthen
seeif
cantake
actionto
changesom
eof
themto
bem
oreplausible.
At
shis
time
questionis
consideredunsatisfactory.
1.N
EW
question.2.
KA
matches
better.3.
RO
knowledge,
YE
Sby
Thad
Thom
pson.4.
Changed
significantlyfrom
initialsubm
ittal.5.
One
Tc
WR
tothe
leftis
NO
Tall
tothe
write.
6.F
igureA
.N
OT
TO
BE
GIV
EN
.7.
Added
at100%
‘4.05,N
ew,
mem
ory,
1.D
oesthe
systemhave
torun
fora
minim
umof
2hours
andof
27F
3that
2hours
am
inimum
of1.5
inthe
recircm
ode?Is
thatw
hatthe
procedureis
stating?A
sklicensee
toexplain.
2.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch3.
Itappears
thatthere
canbe
two
answers.
Discuss
with
(as
change.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
LO
K(F/H
)
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES-401
-9
licensee.T
heprocedure
identifiesa
minim
umof
2hours
butthen
1.5hours
inrecirc
mode.
This
isnot
clearfrom
theprocedure
orthe
question.4.
Can
youreset
containment
spraysw
ithpressure
at23.8
psig?W
hatvalue
canthey
bereset
at15
psig?Y
ES
ucan
resetat
higherpressure.
SD
iscussw
ithlicensee,
toom
anyissu
esneed
todeterm
ineif valid,
valu
ateas
two
correctansw
erstherefore
Unsat.
hpril1,2
013
1P
rocedureshould
be1.5
hoursin
recircm
ode.2.
Incorrectlyevaluated
asU
NSA
T,
thisw
asnot
donecorrectly.
ISan
E.
oran
S.
126AA
2.02,B
ank,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.
28H
3S
2.Q
uestionap
pears
tobe
satisfactory.
pril1
,20
13
1.N
ochange.
)29EK
3.03,M
odifiedB
ank,M
emory,
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Appears
questionis
satisfactory.3.
Bank
questionw
asnot
providedtherefore
couldnot
determine
if
29F
3S
thisquestion
met
them
odifiedcriteria.
Question
isconsidered
satisfactory.
\pril1,
2013
1.N
och
ang
esnecessary.
Q#
2.L
CD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
Linkunits
ward
KJA
Only
6.
UIE
IS
LOK
(F/H)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred.
IPartial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
Focus
Dist.!
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
7.
Explanation
6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
LOK
(F/H)
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LC
D—
TE
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FI C
red.IP
artialJob-
Minutia
#1I B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunitsj
ward
K/A
Only
034A2.03,
New
,M
emory,
1.K
Aap
pears
toN
OT
match.
2.W
hilethe
questionasks
if theR
Ocan
authorizestopping
fuelm
ovement,
thequestion
asksif
afuel
assembly
isput
inthe
1w
rongplace
does
theR
Ohave
theauthority
tosu
spen
dfuel
movem
ent.T
hequestion
ism
ixingup
applesand
oranges.T
hR
Ocan
susp
end
fuelm
ovement.
How
ever,in
thiscase
afuel
assembly
placedin
thew
rongplace
andcan
theR
Ostop
fuelm
ovement.
The
actiondoes
notfix
byprocedure
thism
istake.
uhe
questionshould
askw
illthe
RO
allowthe
FuelH
andlingS
upervisorto
putthe
assembly
inthe
incorrectplace
andthe
answer
isno.
How
ever,d
oes
theR
Odo
torem
edythis?
But
thequestion
asksifthe
RO
has..
authorityto
stopfuel
movem
ent.T
heansw
eris
yeshe
doesbut
ithas
ofix
toplacing
afuel
assembly
inthe
wrong
place.
30F
2-3X
XX
X‘uestion
do
esnot
fixthe
problem.
Evaluated
thisquestion
asU
nsatisfactorybecau
sethe
actiond
oes
notm
itigatethe
problem.
1.I m
ayhave
beentoo
restrictiveon
thecorrection
ofthis
issue.M
aybethis
was
onlythe
mitagative
andthis
makes
theok.
2.T
hequestion
was
rewritten
1pril
1,2013
pril
3,2013
2.L
CD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Q=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.LO
KLO
D(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
___________________________
_____________________
________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
——
——
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linklunits
ward
K/A
Only
)35A4.05,
New
,M
emory,
1.K
Aap
pears
tobarely
match.
The
SG
levelcontrol
isthe
KA
.T
hisis
onlyone
ofthe
parameters
identifiedin
thequestion.
2.P
lacethe
“?“
inside.3.
Question
providesthe
parameter
andw
hyparam
eteris
used.T
hisis
teachingand
shouldbe
removed.
Justput
theparam
eterand
notthe
reason.E
Maintain
PR
ZR
pressuregreater
than1950
psig
Maintain
PR
ZR
levelgreater
thanor
equalto
25%
31F
2-3X
XM
aintainS
GN
Rapprox.
65%
Maintain
steamflow
form
inimum
loopdelta
T
4.C
hangestatem
ent
tostate
which
oneof
thefollow
ingcom
binations.A
ddcom
binationsto
stem.
—i
Make
chan
ges
will
besat.
pril1
,2013
1.C
hangedas
requested.S
2.C
hangedO
NE
toone.
—
)Kasc
han
ged,
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)
_______________________________________________________
__________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
QS
RO
——
—F
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
36AA
1.04,
New
,M
emory
1.K
Aap
pearsto
??2.
The
KA
concernsitself
with
FuelH
andlingIncidents
with
fuelhandling
equipment
duringan
incident.Is
bowing
ortw
istingof
afuel
assembly
considereda
fuelhandling
incident?W
hatare
fuelhandling
incidents?D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
3.T
hefirst
partof
thequestion
statesw
ithFuel
Handling
Supervisor
permission,
rotatingthe
Refueling
Machine
Mast,
isor
isnot
allowed
...
Itseems
thew
aythis
isw
ritten,w
hyw
ouldanyone
selectis
notallow
ed,ifyou
haveFuel
Handling
Supervisors
permission?
This
doesnot
seemreasonable.
Get
-perm
issionbut
thenyou
cannotdo
it?D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
4.T
henthe
secondpart
ofthe
statement
is...if
necessary
the32
F2
XX
Refueling
Machine
hoistcan
orcannot
beoperated.
Does
notm
akesen
sethat
ifnecessary
therefueling
machine
hoistcannot
bem
anuallyoperated.
Itonlym
akessen
seif you
insertcan,
cannotm
akesno
sense.
uestionneeds
tobe
redone,only
thepositive
statemen
tsfit
inthe
lank
s.
pril
1,2
013
1.N
OT
afuel
handlingincident.
Changed
thequestion.
S2.
Changes
made
aresufficient.
3.Q
uestionap
pears
tobe
Ok.
U
II
IAdoes
notbelieve
thatthis
isa
valid,he
remem
bersw
herethe
questionam
efrom
.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkju
nits
ward
K/A
Only
)37AA
2.08,M
odified-Farley,
2010N
RC
.H
igher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Original
questionw
asnot
suppliedE
3.H
asthis
beenverified
onthe
Sim
ulatorto
beaccurate?
4.L
essonplan
identifiesR
E-724,
N16
monitor
andindicates
thatth
eseare
calibratedat
lowpow
ersand
lowlevels.
Which
istrue?
Am
notsure
thatw
hatw
ehave
inthe
questionis
correct.A
sklicensee
torun
onsim
ulatorto
seeif
RE
-724w
illnot
readat
12%pow
er.O
therwise
thiscould
bean
answer.
5.M
ayhave
two
answers.
33H
23
XX
6.N
otsure
what
monitor
hasfailed
inthe
stem.
Have
licenseeexplain.
Itis
notlisted
inm
aterialprovided.
pril
1,2013
S
j1.
724does
notgo
intopow
eruntil
15%.
Have
toknow
that.If
itw
ouldread
there.N
otsure.
2.S
eenon
IPCand
readpurple.
3.A
ddedvalid.
Ok
aschanged.
)38EK
1.03,
Bank
Farley,2004,
Higher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atchbut
isprovided
inthe
stem.
E2.
Why
notuse
theexact
questionas
usedby
Farley.T
hisw
aythe
KA
matches
betterthan
itdo
esthis
one.A
sklicensee
to
34H
3explain
why
theoriginal
questiondo
esnot
work
orw
aschanged
,to
make
itbetter
orw
orse.3.
Recom
mend
togo
backto
Farley
question.
spril1
,2013
1.L
icenseetook
suggestionto
goback
tothe
Farley
question.
LOK
(F/H)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
Form
ES
-401-9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
7.
Explanation
Change
toa
bankquestion.
DK
aschanged,
nofurther
chan
ges
necessary.
39A2.04,
Modified
Callaw
ay,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Callaw
ayquestion
notprovided.
3.O
Kas
presented.
pril1
,20
13
1.O
kasis
——
——
—
)54AA
1.04,M
OD
-HL
17,N
RC
,H
igher,
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Question
ism
odified36
H3
S3.
Question
issatisfactory
\prill,2
013
F1
1.O
Kas
is,no
changen
ecessary
)56Ak3.02,
New
,M
emory
)O(
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Idonot
believethat
distractorC
isreasonable
andplausible.
Findanother
distractorfor
this.R
eplacethis
Distractor.
37F
2-33.
Otherw
iseok
pril2,
2013S
•L
icenseech
anged
C
—
LOK
(F/H)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
UIE
/S
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
7.
Explanation
6.
UIE
IS
35H
2-3S
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
——
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
)59G2.2.22,
New
,H
igherE
1.K
Aappears
tom
atch2.
Isitexpected
thatthe
RO
applicantsknow
Operability
callsfor
thissystem
?D
iscussw
ithlicensee
anden
sure
thatO
PS
RE
Pexpects
thisto
bedone.
3.W
asthis
validatedby
anyR
Os?
Ifsow
hatw
asthe
results?38
H3
4.O
therwise
appears
tobe
ok
sp
ril2,
2013
1.N
onot
expectedto
knowoperability.
2.B
distractorto
LO
CA
Lon
theM
ainC
ontrolB
oard(M
CB
).T
hisis
acontrol
circuitand
notprotection.
OK
aschanged.
)Kas
changed.
61K6.01,
New
,H
igher.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
It app
earsthat
thesecond
partof
thequestion
will
answer
thefirst
partbecau
sethe
statement
tellsyou
thatthe
valvehas
tobe
reset.3.
The
insertedw
ordingfor
thesecond
partdo
esnot
readco
rrectIfor
theansw
er.S
houldthere
bethe
word
“then.”A
sklicensee
toensure
thew
ordingis
correctfor
latchingand
openingthe
T8
Tvalve.
Discuss
toensure
thisis
correct.
LOK
(F/H)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
39H
3
E
IS
ApriI
2,2013
1.C
hangeis
ok.
uestio
nis
Ok
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#L
OK
LO
D(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
___________________________
_____________________
________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#L
OK
LO
D—
——
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
)62AA
1.102,B
ankLO
IT,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
40H
3S
Question
app
earsto
beOk
pril
2,2013
No
comm
ents.
)62K1
.02,B
ank-LO
IT,
Higher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atchE
2.Is
itnecessary
toidentify
what
the186A
(Generator
Differential)
andthe
186B(P
haseO
vercurrent)lockouts
are?Ido
notbelieve
thisis
necessary.R
emove
thisinform
ation,it
is,
teaching.
41H
33.
Otherw
isethe
questionis
ok
pril2,
2013
S1.
Not
necessary
tohave
name.
2.D
etermined
thatthe
changew
asN
OT
warranted
andleft
itthesam
ew
ay.
)Kas
is.N
ochange
was
required.
63K1.03,
New
,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.
2.H
avelicensee
explainhow
thisw
orksduring
inoffice
meeting.
43
E3.
Second
partof
distractorsA
andB,
capitalizeO
NL
Yas
doneother
places.M
inorchange.
pp
earsto
beok
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_________
UIE
ISE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
TIF
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
Focus
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
——
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
pril2,
2013
S1.
Did
request.
‘.
)Kas
changed.
64A4.05
1,E
merg
ency
Diesel
Gen
erator
(ED
G)
System
,
1.A
ppearsquestion
matches
KA
.2.
Does
notidentify
what
thequestion
is,new
,bank,
modified.
This
needsto
beadded
someplace
inthe
information
provided.3.
Be
consistentw
ithnum
beringof
components.
Isthis
thew
ayD
G1B
isidentified?
4.W
hyis
itn
ecessaryto
STA
TE
inthe
thirdbullet
thatthe
LO
CA
L-
43H
3X
ER
EM
OT
Esw
itchis
inL
OC
AL
?I believe
thatthis
iscom
mon
knowledge
forthe
RO
andS
RO
applicantsand
doesnot
haveto
beprovided.
Rem
ovethis
bullet.T
hisis
cuingthe
applicants.D
iscussw
ithfacility
concerningthis
issue.5.
Changed
thew
ordlists”
to“identifies”
tom
akeitclearer
sincethere
isN
Olist
indistractorA
.6.
Question
does
notidentify
theL
evelof
Know
ledgeor
difficulty.I
will
attempt
tom
yability
toad
dress
these
items
onthe
table.T
helicensee
oneach
questionshould
identifyboth
these
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
Form
ES
-401-9
uestionis
considerededitorial
andneed
seditorial
enh
ancem
ents
asscu
ssedabove.
jvVednesday,
March
13,2013
sN
ew,
Higher,
1.N
umber
3above,
removed
LO
CA
Las
requested.
kdditionaleditorial
comm
ent,does
theO
NL
Yin
distractorsA
Cand
D-
tobe
capitalizedas
doneother
places.B
econsistent.
Lpril
2,2013
)64K1
.03,B
ank-LO
IT,
Mem
ory,
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
What
does
theactual
answer
mean?
Itapp
earsthat
Either
Train
onE
itherU
nitFO
ST.
Does
thatm
eanthat
Train
AF
OS
Tcan
supplyT
rainA
FO
ST
?Is
ittruethat
theA
UX
Boiler
canalso
supplyfuel
toanyone
ofthe
DG
sF
OS
T?
3.D
idany
validatorsget
thisincorrect?
4.W
hyw
ouldanyone
believethat
onlythe
auxboiler?
This
systemseem
sto
bevery
capableof
many
lineups.
5.C
anunit
1and
unit2
crossconnect
asw
ellas
Unit
1train
Ato
Unit
1train
B?
“e
licenseeshow
examiners
howthis
systemw
orks.M
akesure
thereno
confusionas
tow
hatthe
answer
means.
pril
2,2013
LOK
(F/H)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
LO
K(F/H
)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
‘Cues
T/F
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AC
7.
Explanation
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
qualifiers.
44M
)kas
change
3
1.E
achcan
becross
connected.B
yprocedure.
2.C
hangeand
toO
R.
ES
-4
01
,R
ev.
9W
ritten
Exam
ination
Review
Worksheet
Form
ES
-4
01
-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
___________________________
._____________________
________
U/E
/SE
xplanationS
temC
uesT
/FJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OF
ocuslink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D—
1—
——
1—
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
)Kas
changed.
)PS
rephas
anissue
with
thisquestion.
Will
talkto
BC
aboutthis
uesto
n.
,.
..
...Iprtl
3,2013
)KN
Och
anges
65AG
2.4.461,
065AG
2.4.46L
ossof
Instrument
Air
1.L
astbullet
statesrequirem
entshould
beplural
andhave
ratherthan
has.P
roceduralrequirem
entsfor
trippingthe
Reactor
havebeen
met.
Not
sureoriginal
iscorrect.
This
readsbetter.
What
areth
eseis
thereonly
one?A
sklicensee
toidentify
theE
triprequirem
ents.2.
Take
thew
ord“correct”
outof
thequestion
stem.
Re-w
riteto
readW
hichone
ofthe
following
(WO
OT
F)identifies:
3.K
Ais
matched
andit also
goes
beyondthe
KA
.4.
Are
applicantsexpected
toknow
thelocation
ofthis
switch?
Ask
licensee.45
F2-3
X5.
KA
analysisstates
thatthe
KA
ism
atchedb
ecause
thequestion
teststhe
applicantsability
tounderstand
HO
Wvarious
airoperated
valvesfail.
=6.
INthe
bulletidentifying
that1-P
V-9375
isclosed
thisis
teaching.
Additionally
theK
Aanalysis
in5
aboveis
nottested
inthis
..
questionthis
information
isprovided,
couldbe
considered...
teaching.7
Discuss
with
licenseethe
differencebetw
eenT
urbinelevels
1and
levelA
rhereare
anum
berof
issues
with
thisquestion
thatrequires
alot
of.
?nhancement.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)
2.LO
D(1-5)
Q:
SR
OK
/AO
nly
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred. IP
artialJob-
MinutiaF
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OF
ocusD
ist.Link
jun
itsw
ardK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
1Jed
nesd
ay
,M
arch13,
2013
1.O
kasis.
)71K4.05,
Mod-L
OIT
Bank,
Higher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Why
isit
necessary
toprovide
inthe
stemthat
A-R
V-0014
Ecloses
ona
highradiation
signal?T
heapplicants
shouldknow
thisfrom
systemknow
ledge.3.
On
validation,did
anyoneget
thisincorrect?
46H
2-34.
Have
licenseeexplain
what
isbeing
asked
?A
ndw
hatthis
ittrying
totest?
pril2,
2013
1.T
hesystem
works
thisw
ay.S
2.8
of11
gotthis
correct.3.
Rem
ovedthe
word
Autom
aticallyin
thestem
.
—4)K
asc
hanged
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.L
OD
(1
-5
)
__________________________
____________________
________
________________
____________________________________________
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
#1B
ack-Q
=S
RO
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
1072K1.03,
Modified
HL
-15RA
udit,H
igher,
1.K
Aap
pears
toN
OT
match,
fuelbuilding
isolation.H
ighalarm
onlyprovides
theaudible
andvisual
indicationsno
isolation.S
econdpart
does
notisolate
itonlyeither
startsfiltration
ordoes
notstart
filtration.In
thiscase
AL
ER
Tonly
doesnot
cause
startingof
thefiltration.
NO
isolationof
fuelbuilding.
Does
notm
atchK
A2.
Original
questionw
asnot
provided,therefore,
couldnot
determine
ifquestionm
eetsthe
modified
criteria.3.
Question
canbe
answered
without
knowing
howthis
systemw
orks.Ifthe
firstalarm
isa
High
alarm,
thenthis
would
causethe
systemto
providethe
functionto
occur.S
incethe
secondfiltration
unitdoes
notreceive
astart
signalonly
analert,
thenyou
canassum
ethat
thisdoes
notstart
thesystem
onlyapproaching
thestart
signal.
Jeedto
changequestion
tom
atchK
A.
What
causesisolation
offueluilding?
pril2,
2013
1.A
ddeda
highalarm
andm
adethe
questionbetter.
2.R
e-arrangedthis
questionand
swapped
bothparts.
uestio
nis
okas
changed.S
eethe
testquestion
forchanges.
——
——
——
——
—I7
3A
2.0
2,B
ankH
L-1
6,M
em
ory
,
;1.
KA
app
earsto
match.
48F
2-32.
Question
appears
tobe
Ok.
pril2,
2013
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
LinkLunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
LOK
(F/H)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
QISRO
KIA
jpy
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred.
IPartial
Job-F
ocusD
ist.Link 4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
7.
Explanation
Minutia
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
47H
2-3x
UIS
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
——
——
I(F/H
)(1-5)
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OU
/E/S
IE
xplanationF
ocusD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nlyj
1.N
och
anges
)76K2.04,
New
,H
igher,
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
For
distractorsC
andD
capitalizeO
NL
Y.
AS
inother
questions.49
H3
SQ
uestionap
pears
tobe
Ok.
pril2
,2013
1.O
Kaccepted
)76K3.05,
Modified
—L
OIT
Bank,
Higher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch,2.
Should
‘no”be
underlinedor
something
tothat
effect?S
oan
applicantdoes
notp
assover
it.3.
Original
questionw
asnot
provided,therefore
couldnot
50H
2-3S
determine
ifthism
eetsthe
modified
requirements.
4.R
emove
correctlyfrom
stem.
uestio
nis
Okas
isw
ithm
inorcom
ments
above.
-ril2,
2013NO
incaps.
Ok
aschanged.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
ON
thegraph
provided,I w
ouldlike
tohave
thew
ordingon
the
51H
2-3S
Yaxis
ofL
eadingand
Lagging
removed.
The
applicantshould
knoww
hatthey
arew
ithoutthis
information.
3.Iflead
lagare
leftin
ongraph
thendistractor
Cis
notplausible.
The
analysisstates
iftheapplicants
don’tnotice,
well
theyw
ill,.
noticeifthey
arethere.
.02,B
ank—H
L-17,
Higher
LOK
(F/H)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
LOK
(F/H)
1.2.
3._Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D—
——
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
1.A
ddto
thestem
theprocedure
thatthis
NO
TE
comes
from.
13713-C,
2.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.52
M2
SM
inorchange,
evaluatedas
sat
.pril2,
2013
1.A
ddedprocedure
note.O
Kas
changed.
:*•<
79G1.2.23,
New
Higher
.1.
KA
appearsto
match
53H
3??
2.In
thissituation
howm
anyR
CP
sw
ouldbe
runningand
theN
CP
.•;
would
beavailable
andor
running?A
skifthis
shouldbe
inthe
initialconditions?
nm
inorchange
tohandout
questionis
satisfactory.
,.pril2
,2013
1.O
neapplicant
missed
lastexam
.2.
Licensee
statesthat
thisw
asa
directrepeat
fromH
L-17
exam.
3.S
incethe
licenseestates
thatthe
examiners
wrote
thisdistractor.
WE
will
acceptthis
questionat
facevalue.
KA
SIS
rocedure18007-C
page7
Of52
indicatesitis
revision1212712013,
rev‘ate.
Rev
Num
ber.9.3.
Greg
will
lookup
why?
Should
be9.1.
......4.0
2,
New
,M
emory,
Q#
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
0=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
LO
K(F/H
)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
7.
Explanation
3.W
hatprocedure
would
theplant
bein
priorto
theentry
intothe
lossof
instrument
air?
LA
ppearsto
beok
however
Ineedto
understandw
hatis
availablein
terms
fAR
V(s),
RC
Ps,
NC
P?
hpril2,
2013
1.R
emoved
theR
CP
fromthe
stem.
2.O
Kas
changed.
)Kas
is.
man
ges
were
acceptedsee
theexam
toreview
changes.
Q#
2.LO
D(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
Q#
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
LOK
(F/H)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
7.
Explanation
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
86A3.03,
Bank
—V
ogtle2005/H
L,
Higher.
1.K
Aap
pearsto
2.T
hew
aythe
systemis
designedand
allsystem
son
aloss
ofpow
erthere
would
besom
ethingthat
would
allowa
fireto
be54
H3
Edetected.
Idonot
believethat
asystem
would
havebeen
designedw
ithoutthis
inm
ind.W
iththis
inm
indsom
eonecould
identifythat
thesystem
will
detecta
firew
ithoutpow
er.T
hereforeit
isunreasonable
tobelieve
thatthe
othertw
odistractors
Band
Care
creditable.W
hatch
anges
couldbe
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
LO
K(F/H
)
Stem
ICues
[F
ocus
7.
Explanation
made
tom
akethe
oppositeansw
ercreditable?
3.In
distractorA
,w
hatare
theclapper
valvesand
why
would
theapplicants
believethey
would
haveto
tripthem
manually?
Licensee
toexplain
soIcan
determine
ifthisis
plausible.4.
There
are4
differentansw
ersfor
part2
ofthe
question.Is
therea
way
touse
only2
ofthem
?5.
Distractor
B,is
itcomm
onknow
ledgefor
operatorsconcerning
thislevel
thatis
discu
ssed?
itpossibleto
havethe
firedetection
systemN
OT
detectthe
firebut
SIhave
thefire
pump
start?Is
thisreaso
nab
le?Iam
notsure
why
thereis
ajdistinction
between
thetw
o.Is
thequestion
speakingto
justthe
Alarm
inin
rt1?1.
New
questionw
asprovided.
2.N
ewquestion
isconsidered
sat.3.
Okfo
rtest.4.
New
questionis
more
mem
orylevel.
DD
..3.01,M
od—
Bank
Farley,M
emory.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Question
appears
tobe
ok.
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
LOK
(F/H)
2.LO
D(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Cues
Focus
T/F
Cred.
Dist.
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s
Partial
Job-Link
Minutia
7.
Explanation
5.O
ther
#1B
ack-Q
unitsw
ardK
/A
6.
U/E
/SS
RO
Only
2,2
01
3
55H
3S4
pril2,
2013
)kas
is.
103K3.01,
New
,M
emory
56F
2-3S
i.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Question
app
earsto
beO
k.
Form
ES
-401-9E
S-401,
Rev.
9
LO
K(F/H
)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
‘ril2,
2013
2.3._P
sychometric_F
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
KLO
D—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linklunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.1
.15,
New
,M
emory.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.
57F
1-2S
2.Q
uestionis
trivial.L
evelof
difficultyis
a1-2.
pril
2,2013
.)K
asis.
)2.1.29,M
odifiedB
ankLO
IT,M
emory,
E1.
KA
appears
tom
atch,2.
What
isthe
procedureto
dothe
same
itemhow
everit
isin
ahigh
radiationarea?
—3.
This
questionhas
aL
OD
of1.
58F
1
Spril
3,2013
1.C
hangedto
addnoun
name
fora
safetyrelated
valverather
thanjust
sayinga
Safety
Related
valve.T
hisrequires
theR
O/S
RO
toidentify
thatthe
valveis
aS
afetyR
elatedvalve.
.
2.G
oodchange
KA
Schanged.
See
examfor
allch
anges
made.
eifw
ecan
changethis
tosuggestion
aboveitthere
isa
differentnsw
er.
Ithinkw
ecan
dobetter
thanthis.
We
canonly
haveso
many
‘ower
levelquestions
andIw
ouldlike
tom
akethis
more
challenging.
“--12,2
013
1.N
EE
Ds
more
WO
RK
.
2.LO
D(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
asis.
2.3.
Psychom
etric_Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
I—
—I—
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
ues
T/F
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q”
SR
OU
IEIS
Explanation
Focu
siD
ist.Link
jun
itsw
ardK
/AO
nly
3.2.1.43,N
ew,
Higher.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Question
appears
tobe
Ok.
59H
2-3S
\pril2,
2013
A1G2.2
.42,
Modified
—LO
IT,M
emory.
J1.
KA
appears
tom
atch‘IJ
2.Is
theoperators
expectedto
knowfrom
mem
oryeach
Tech
JS
pec
parameter
andif
itis
insp
ecor
not?E
nsurethe
OP
S60
F2
Irepresentative
isasked
ifhe
expectedthis
tobe
remem
bered.
ppears
tobe
Ok
if Operations
Supervisor
agrees
thisis
expected.
1.O
PS
repstated
thatthis
isrequired
mem
ory.T
HIS
ISO
K2.
Word
smithed
thedistractors.
See
examination
forchanges.
32.2.44,
Bank
—H
L-15,
Higher
1.K
Aap
pears
tobe
match
2.R
emove
thew
ord“correct”
fromthe
stem.
3.In
stemem
phasizeN
Oprior
tooperator
action.
61H
2-3S
therwise
questionap
pears
tobe
Ok.
pril2,
2013
1.C
hangedstem
.S
eequestion
Kas
is.
.r.jI2,
2013
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.LO
D(1-5)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOKL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
IEIS
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.3.11,B
ankLO
IT,H
igher.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
On
page4
of90
inthe
reference,13216-1,
2.1.5states
andR
XE
/S0018
doesnot
showa
troublecondition.
What
does
thatactually
mean?
Isthe
monitor
asdescribed
inthe
questionin
atroubled
condition?L
icenseeto
explainw
hatthis
means.
3.R
emove
thew
ord“correct”
andthen
reword
thequestion.
4.IN
thestem
WM
T#9
isbeing
released,how
ever,none
ofthe
distractorsas
well
asthe
questiondoes
notreference
the#9,
do
esit
haveto?
Ithinkitdoes.
5.W
hatis
meant
bythe
OD
CM
requirements?
Please
putth
esein
theanalysis
sow
ecan
capturew
hatthis
means.
The
OD
CM
is62
H2
notdefined
noris
theprocedure
number
identified.T
hisshould
alsobe
added.-q
6.T
heprocedure
byw
hichthe
WM
Tis
beingreleased
shouldalso
bein
thestem
.T
oensure
thatthe
questionis
totallycorrect.
ST
hisshould
reference13216-1,
Liquid
Waste
Release.
inor
changes,question
isconsidered
sat.
....il2,
2013
uestio
nap
pears
tom
atch.
1.Spell
outthe
OD
CM
2.O
kas
change.
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s
Job-M
inutia#1
Back
Linkunits
ward
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
___________________________
_____________________
________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOKL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
32.3.12,
New
,M
emory
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
The
questionhas
theK
EY
Bypass
Switch,
theprocedure
calls
E/S
thisthe
Bypass
interlockK
eyfor
theK
eyB
ypassSw
itch.Is
theterm
inologyused
onthe
questionthe
correctw
ayto
statethis?
Ibelieveitshould
bea
Bypass
InterlockK
eyand
thenneed
to
63F
2-3change
thestem
tostate
must
beused
tooverride
theK
eyB
ypassSw
itch.IS
thisthe
case?L
icenseeto
explain.3.
ON
LY
need
scaps
inboth
distractorsB
andD
.
Otherw
iseap
pears
tobe
Ok.
Spril
2,2013
1.A
ddedcorrect
terminology.
2.
Okasch
ang
ed.
32.409,
Bank
—LO
IT,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pearsto
be
2.D
onot
seew
hydistractor
Ais
aplausible
distractor,the
pressurein
thissituation
isw
aybelow
thereseating
pressureof
therelief
valve.N
otsure
thisis
reallyplausible.
Discuss
with
licensee.3.
Fordistractor
D,
where
thesubcooling
isless
than38
degF
64H
3E
however
thissituation
isnot
adverseand
thesubcooling
is24
degF.
Ifthisw
as24
degF
fora
non-adversesituation,
thenthis
would
beor
couldbe
correct?Is
thisw
hatthe
questionanalysis
isstating?
Itseems
thatthe
answer
canbe
changedto
becorrect
ifwe
talkabout
subcoolingand
use24.
Replace
distractorA
with
something
thatis
more
plausible.T
hereis
aleak
someplace
however
containment
pressureand
radlevels
arenot
loingup.
Isthis
acorrect
statement
oris
thisfictitious?
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
\pril2,
2013
1.D
istractorA
isnot
plausible,have
notfigured
outw
hatto
dofor
this.S
2.C
hangeddistractor
Ato
Manually
SIhandsw
itches.
A_____________________
32.4.27,
Bank
NL
-17,M
emory
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch\2.
Isthe
reasonbecau
seT
rainB
isolatedfrom
Class
1E
circuitsin
theC
ontrolR
oom?
Ask
license.65
F1-2
S3.
Question
appears
tobe
Ok.
\pril2
,2013
66F
1-2
1.O
Kas
is,yes
itis.
Ippears
tobe
Ok.
2.4.39,M
OD
—M
NS
2010H
L,m
emory,
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atchi
2.O
riginalquestion
notprovided
inpackage.
3.Q
uestionis
mem
orylevel.
4.V
erylow
levelof
knowledge.
pril
2,2013
1.O
Kasis.
2.A
ddedR
EP
EA
TE
Din
caps.
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LOD
——
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
ftE02E
A2.1,
Bank—
Farley,
Higher
1.K
Aap
pearsto
2.In
theInitial
conditionsis
itn
ecessaryto
providethat
theM
SIV5
Ehave
occurreddue
tocontainm
entpressu
re?W
hatpressure
was
this?W
hynot
providethis
information?
Pressu
reV
alue.C
ontainment
pressurereached
3.Is
thissituation
something
thatthe
Operations
Rep
expectsthe
RO
applicantsto
knowfrom
mem
ory?N
ormally
thistype
ofprocedure
determination
isdone
bythe
SR
Os.
Ensure
thisis
01w
iththe
OP
Srep.
4.D
istractorD
isnot
plausiblein
thatthere
isnothing
associated67
H3
with
AF
Wor
main
feedthat
would
indicatethat
thereis
sufficientfeed
flowand
thinkingthat
theS
Glevels
arenot
highenough
well
thatd
oes
notcom
einto
play.T
hisis
goingto
beevaluated
asan
E.T
hisdistractor
hasto
bechanged
tom
akeitm
oreS
plausible.Ialm
ostw
ouldrather
usere-diagnosis
atleast
theyw
ouldhave
tofigure
outw
hy.
Distractor
D.
2,2013
1.Y
ES,
RO
5are
expectedto
knowthis
information
lAW
theO
psR
ep.R
esponsibleat
thetransitions.
2.L
eaveas
is,no
changeis
necessary.
E05E
K3.2
,N
ew,
Higher.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.68
H3
E2.
Why
fordistractors
Aand
B,first
parthas
areason
forthe
action.W
hynotjust
havefirst
partonly.
To
preventSI
fromre
actuating.
LOK
(F/H)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
UIE
/S
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
___________________________
_____________________
________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
QS
RO
—
—F
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.L
OK
LO
D—
——
__
__
——
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
3.R
emove
thisand
thisshould
beOk.
Minor
changein
2,discuss
andshould
besat
thenw
ithchange.
pril
2,2013
1.N
Ochange,
licenseestates
thatrem
ovingthis
would
cause
Sdistractor
Cto
alsobe
correctbecau
sethe
SIsignal
isthe
same
signaland
youcannot
identifythe
differencebetw
eenthe
Sis.
__
__
__
I
2.A
ddedto
distractorsB
andC
.see
examfor
chan
ges
toth
esedistractors.
)Kas
chan
ged
.
VE
O4E
k2.1,B
ankH
L-17,
Higher.
69H
2-3S
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Question
usedlast
exam.
NE
O5E
K2.2,
New
,H
igher.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
The
procedurestates
“tryto
establishto
atleast
oneSG
.”this
isdifferent
than“F
eedO
NL
YO
NE
SG
asstated
indistractors
Aand
B.N
eedto
askO
PS
andL
icenseem
anagement
ifthew
aythis
isw
rittenitm
eansjust
that,“F
eedO
NL
YO
NE
SG
?”3.
The
initialconditions
provideindication
ofa
HO
TD
RY
SG.
With
70H
2-3X
XC
ET
Cs
at552°
Fand
wide
rangeat
lessthan
10%in
ALL
SG
sN
Oone
would
chooseeither
ofdistractors.
And
Ithereforecontent
thatneither
distractorC
orD
isplausible.
WE
areshow
ingtw
oextrem
esin
thisquestion.
4.F
eedingA
LLS
/Gs
do
esnot
appearto
becreditable
becau
seof
theplant
conditions.T
hequestion
couldbe
developedto
changethe
SG
slevels
andprovide
specificS
/Gs
levelsabove
andbelow
10%or
havethe
containment
inan
adversecondition
asto
elicitthosenum
bers.
U
A
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_________
UIE
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
O
——
—F
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3.
Psychom
etric_Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.L
OK
L0D
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesTIE
Partial
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
QS
RO
UIE
ISE
xplanationF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
5.D
istractorC
’sreason
why
isnon
specificenough
andleads
tothe
testtaker
todeterm
inethat
fromthe
initialconditions.
The
stemonly
pointsto
AFW
beingreturned
however
thatd
oes
notprovide
sufficientinform
ationas
tow
hatM
AX
feedcapabilities
are.W
hatis
thetest
takersupposed
todeterm
inew
hatis
availabilityofA
FW.
Since
thespecifics
arenot
availablew
edon’t
knoww
hatthat
is.N
ON
-Plausible.
And
thesam
eargum
entfor
Distractor
0.
Evaluated
asa
Udue
tonon-plausible
distractors.
rU2,2
013
1.C
hangedthe
question.S
EE
CO
MPL
ET
EN
EWquestion
onthe
test.2.
VA
LID
AT
EA
ND
SE
EW
HA
TH
AP
PE
NS
TO
STU
CK
INT
HE
__
__
_
DE
TA
ILS.
DIS
CU
SS
WIT
HM
.FR
AN
KE
.
NE
O6E
G2.4.20,
New
,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pears
to2.
Isthis
aquestion
theR
Oapplicants
areexpected
toansw
er?E
nsurethat
theO
psrep
agrees
with
askingthe
RO
applicants.3.
Iftheyare
expectedto
knowthis
fromm
emory,
why
would
theR
Os
remem
bersom
ethinglike
distractorC
?4.
There
isa
periodat
theend
ofdistractor
D.
thisshould
notbe
71H
2-3X
there.5.
What
didthe
validationshow
?A
nyonem
issthis?
Discuss
with
licensee.
S1.
ASK
ED
OP
Srep.
HE
statedthat
—“IS
notsure
thatC
andD
arew
ithinthe
scope.2.
NE
ED
TO
LO
OK
AT
DIST
RA
CT
OR
Sc
AN
DD
.FIN
DN
EW
IC
HE
CK
S.
j3.
POT
EN
TIA
L—
complete
19022,transition
isnot
required
Cred.
Dist.
E
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES-401
-9
#1B
ack-Q
SR
Ounits
ward
K/A
Only
4.T
hisw
asrew
rittenby
Am
anda,sh
eprovided
guidanceto
helpw
ithensuring
thatdistractors
Cand
Dplausible
however
incorrect.T
hisquestion
issat
aschanged.
See
examto
seehow
much
was
changed.
IlVE
12EK
1.1,M
odifiedH
L-16
NR
C,
Higher.
1.K
Aappears
tom
atch2.
Why
isW
RS
Glevel
notprovided?
3.M
odificationhas
same
initialconditions,
two
answers
were
changed.T
4.T
heansw
eris
thesam
efor
question#
70,it
isa
differentsituation
however
theam
ountof
flowis
30gpm
.C
anan
applicantfigure
outthe
answer
bylooking
atboth
these
questions.5.
Believe
thatth
esetw
oquestions
canbe
usedto
getansw
er.B
oththe
answers
arealm
ostthe
same.
INeed
toreplace
thisor
#70
1.70
was
changedsignificantly.
Changed
70to
havenot
toexceed
to100
gpm.
ForA
andB.
2.S
EE
bothquestions
tosee
howthis
isnow
OK
.u
estion
#70
1.L
icenseestates
thatthe
secondpart
ofthe
answer
isnot
correct.R
easonfor
30gpm
.R
educedryout
andm
inimize
thermal
stresses.
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Linkunits
ward
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Focus
Cuesl
T/F
Cred.
Dist.
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s
Partial
Job-Link
Minutia
7.
Explanation
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
72H
2-3
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
___________________________
_____________________
________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/E
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
0=
SR
O
——
—F
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.LO
KL
OD
——
__
__
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.T
hesuggestions
didnot
work
haveto
goback
tothe
originalquestion.
Look
atthe
draft.3.
Now
neww
ordingof
thestem
.4.
See
thefinal
examfor
complete
wording
changes.C
hangesm
adebasically
went
backto
theoriginal
submittal
andtook
the
S30
gpmout
ofthe
distracters.5.
Does
notnow
conflictw
ith70.
pril3,
2013
——
__
__
_
——
—
—)K
aschan
ged
.
VE
13EA
1.2,B
ankLO
IT,M
emory.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Distractor
Bdo
esnot
seemplausible.
Iwould
notthink
totry
toinject
becau
seof
thelevel
inthe
#3
SG.
Itseems
that85%
is
Egetting
tothe
hightrip
setpointand
would
bean
issueof
carryover.
3.D
istractorC
isreasonable
73F
3x
4.Is
it necessary
toidentify
thatthere
isa
SG
over-pressurizationgoing
onin
thequestion
stem?
Why
notsay
anaction
tom
itigatethe
situationgoing
onabove?
Will
thisw
ork?
priI3,
2013
1.C
hangedstem
toadd
LO
SP.S
2.C
hangedS
G3
Level
to78
vice85.
See
Exam
tosee
what
was
changed.M
inimal
changes.
ES
-401,
Rev.
9W
ritten
Exam
ination
Review
Worksheet
Form
ES
-40
1-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.LO
KL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)
____________________________________________________
_________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3.
Psychom
etric_Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#L
OK
LO
D—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OIJ/E
/5E
xplanationF
ocusD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
NE
14Ek2.1,
Bank—
LO
IT,
Mem
ory.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.E
/S2.
INthis
questionyou
askW
OO
TF
completes
thefollow
ingstatem
ents.W
herestatem
entis
plural.T
hisis
inconsistentw
ithall
otherquestions.
Need
todeterm
inew
hichw
ayw
illbe
done.U
singstatem
entor
statemen
ts?Itm
akesno
differenceto
me.
3.O
NL
Yneed
sto
becapitalized
inA
andB
74F
2-34.
BO
TH
shouldalso
becapitalized
indistractors
Cand
D.
5.“signal”
inthe
stemshould
besignal(s).
Cand
Dare
plural.
Otherw
iseap
pears
tobe
Ok.
Fixm
inorinconsistencies
asw
ellas
above.
pril3,
2013
1.C
hangesabove
were
made
asrequested.
2.A
ppearsto
beok.
VE
16EK
3.2,N
ew,
Mem
ory,
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch75
FS
2.Q
uestionap
pears
tobe
Ok.
pril3,
2013
1.N
oissues.
SR
OO
NL
YQ
uestions.
05AG
2.107,B
ank,H
igher,
1.K
Aappears
tobe
Ok.
76H
2-3S
2.W
henyou
aska
questionconcerning
bases,
isthe
questionasked
byasking
aboutthe
TS
andnot
listingthe
bases
when
itis
beingask
ed?
Ask
licensee.S
houldw
ejust
sayin
accordance_with_T
S_vice_TS_B
ases?
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Q”
SR
OK
/AO
nly
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)(1-5)
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
U/E
/SE
xplanationF
ocusD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
3.Q
uestionap
pears
tobe
Ok.
pril
3,2013
1.O
kasis.
)05G2.1.32,
New
,M
emory
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Firstpart
ofquestion
isR
Oknow
ledge.IS
25less
than50?
Ifit
Eis
thenw
ecould
havetw
oansw
ersthat
arecorrect.
Does
thisneed
tobe
changedto
theM
AX
IMU
Mallow
abletem
perature?D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
77F
2-3X
X3.
Second
partof
questionap
pears
tobe
okw
ithS
RO
knowledge.
4.S
houldthe
word
bases”be
basis”for
thesecond
partof
.question?
Ask
licensee.
pril3,
2013S
1.C
hangedas
requestedin
Num
ber2
above.2.
Changed
above.
08A2.02,
New
,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Inthe
stemunder
initialconditions
identifiesa
leakand
proceedsto
informthe
applicantthat
thesystem
works
asdesigned.
Isit
necessary
tosay
itthisw
ay?78
H3
S3.
The
fillin
theblank
inpart
1can
bechanged,
remove
“tobe”
priorto
theblank.
So
theansw
erw
ouldread
SS
will
declare...T
rainA’
Operable
orinoperable.
4.S
econdpart
do
esnot
readcorrectly
with
theincorrect
answer.
)therwise
ok
pril
3,2013
LOK
(F/H)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#/
Back
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#L
OK
LO
D—
——
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesTIE
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
U/E
ISE
xplanationF
ocusD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
1.#
2is
Okas
is.N
ochange
necessary.2.
)08AG
2.4.30,N
ew,
Mem
ory
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch
79F
2-3S
2.In
stemput
lastquotes
afterthe
questionm
ark.L
ikethis?”
3.R
eword
distractorAto
“RC
SC
onfirmed
presen
ceof
looseparts.”
This
isso
itis
nota
copyof
theprocedure.
——
——
—4.
Question
appears
tobe
Okm
inorw
ordingchange.
I11EA
2.07,N
ew,
Higher
1.In
theconditions
pressureis
12psig,
isitslow
lyrising
asin
theC
ET
s?L
icenseeto
address.2.
Distractors
Band
Dare
NO
Tplausible
becau
seof
the711°
F.Just
becau
sethis
number
app
earsin
thisprocedure,
first,are
theyexpected
toknow
what
thisnum
beris,
thenw
hyw
ouldthey
haveto
remem
bera
procedurestep
loopback
number
ofsom
esorts?
Ask
licenseeto
findanother
number
thatthe
applicantsw
ouldor
couldm
akea
mistake
with.
Since
thisis
oneissue
tha
80H
XX
Een
com
passes
two
distractorsw
illnot
callitan
Unsat
question.3.
Insecond
questionthe
nounnam
eis
notcorrect.
Need
toadd
an“E
l”in
thenoun
name
forthe
procedure,1901
0-C.
Fixthis.
4.In
thecurrent
conditions,add
tothe
procedurenoun
name
theletter
designationof
“FR
-Cl”.
5.Is
itexpectedthat
theS
RO
knowfrom
mem
orythat
forthis
situationthat
adversenum
bersfor
theSIG
levelsare
32%?
Ask
Operations
Rep
tom
akesure
theyagree
thisis
am
emory
item.
Findanother
reasonablenum
berfor
Band
D.
Have
licenseeexplain
howhe
applicantis
tocom
eup
with
thereis
NO
sealcooling.
Use
printsuring
prepw
eek.
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
TIEF
ocus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/F
/S
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
___________________________
_____________________
________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
uiD
ML.04
1,A
bilityto
(a)pred
ictth
eim
pacts
ofth
efollow
ingm
alfunctio
ns
oroperatio
ns
onth
eN
ISan
d(b)
based
onth
ose
pred
iction
s,use
pro
cedures
toco
rrect,co
ntro
l,or
mitig
ateth
eco
nseq
uen
cesof
tho
sem
alfun
ctions
oroperatio
ns:
1.U
sethe
conventionfor
theuse
ofparenthesis
isto
incorporatethe
comm
ainside
theparenthesis.
Therefore
when
usingth
eseto
identifya
procedure,“P
ower
Operation
(Mode
1),”is
thew
ayto
usethis.
Please
usethis
conventionand
changeall
areasthis
appears.2.
Inthe
questionsstem
,rem
ovethe
word
“correctly”this
isim
plicitin
thequestion.
Use
thisconvention
inall
questions.3.
What
doesit
mean
when
Delta
Ip
eaks?
This
isnot
clear.Is
iat
theend
ofthe
targetvalue
isit
aboveor
belowthe
targevalue.
This
hasto
beclearer.
Discuss
andchange
toensur€.
applicantsknow
what
isbeing
described.4.
Adiagram
may
helpw
ith3
above.5.
Inthe
stema
comm
ais
necessary
afterthe
(AFD
),”6.
Isit
correctthat
theD
eltaI
iskept
ontarget
orw
ithintarget.
Also
isthis
oscillationout
onboth
sides(dog
house)of
thitarget
oronly
oneside?
Isitn
ecessaryto
explainthis?
7.S
RO
only?T
hefirst
partis
RO
andthe
secondpart
ism
emor
ofthe
TS
isthis
onlyS
RO
knowledge
requirements?
Discus:
with
licensee.
hereare
many
questionsas
yousee
aboutthis
question.
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
reci.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
--
-—
--—
,--
I-—
U
81H
2-3
•:4
1.5
143
.5/4
5.3
145.5)
xx
xx
IDiscuss
with
licenseeto
understandcom
ments.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
LOK
LO
D(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
__________________________
______________________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.L
OK
LO
D—
_____
___
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
=S
RO
U/E
/SE
xplanationF
ocusD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
Monday,
March
11,2013
1.Q
uestionw
aschanged
and2.
The
answer
hasthe
same
words
asthe
secondpart
ofth
blank.D
eletefrom
distractorsB
andD
for(2)
insertC
BD
becau
sethis
isin
thequestion
itself.T
hereforeB
andD
shoulcread
“over
time
asD
eltaI
3.T
heansw
eris
kindof
obviousfor
the24
hours.
ruesday,M
arch12,
2013
4.Q
uestionto
Operations
Rep.
Isthis
7day
allowance
orT
requirement
requiredknow
ledge?Is
thissom
ethingthat
thS
RO
isexpected
tohave
inhis
mem
ory?R
equiredm
emory’.
NR
Conly
requiresthe
SR
Oto
have1
hourT
Sknow
ledge.5.
Isit
truethat
onm
issedsurveillances
a25%
graceperiod
i’allow
ed?D
oesthis
playinto
thisat
all?6.
Isit
necessary
tohave
toput,
inthe
stem,
thatthe
oscillationstarts
orap
pro
aches
theright
sideof
thedog
house?7.
Discuss
with
licenseethe
newquestion.
Istill
havem
arnquestions.
8.D
istractorsB
andD
secondpart
shouldread:
“asD
eltaI
irrising
tokeep
Delta
Iwithin
thetarget
value.”9.
Distractors
Aand
Csecond
partshould
read:“as
Delta
Ireach
esthe
rightside
ofthe
doghouse
insertC
BD
backto
thtarget
value.10.
Discuss
these
solicensee
understandsth
esech
anges
toth
changedquestion.
b,Jewch
ang
esare
cosmetic
changes,the
questionis
anE
now.
•uesday,M
arch12,
201382
•heinform
ationco
ncern
ing
this
questionis
missing.
Viiineed
toreview
this
when
inth
eoffice.
ES
-4
01
,R
ev.
9W
ritten
Exam
ination
Review
Worksheet
Form
ES
-4
01
-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.LO
KL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)
____________________________________________________
__
__
__
__
_
UIE
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
TIEJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
=S
RO
Focus
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D—
F—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FJ C
red.P
artialJob-J M
inutia#1
Back-
QJ S
RO
UIE
JSE
xplanationF
ocusj
Dist.
Link!
unitsw
ardK
/AJO
nly
29EG
2.4.18A
nticip
atedT
ransien
tW
ithoutS
cram,
Know
ledgeof
hesp
ecificbases
forE
OP
s:(C
FR:
41.10143.1
I45.13)
1.A
nticipatedin
theK
Adescription
ism
isspelled.M
issingan
“i.’2.
Ininitial
conditionsput
theperiod
inthe
parenthesis.ie.
AT
WT
.”3.
Rem
ove‘correctly.”
4.T
hereis
noreason
tobe
in19211-C
unlessthe
reactordid
nottrip,
Isit
necessary
toadd
tobullet
fortotal
lossof
feedthat
thereactor
didnot
tripor
couldnot
betripped?
Why
would
theS
RO
83H
2-3—
takeactions
for19211
-Cunless
thathappened.
ISthis
necessary
?D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
Ibelieveit
need
sto
beadded.
5.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.6.
IsSR
Oonly.
s7.
Why
ispart
2of
Band
Dplausible?
What
arethe
entrypoints
tothe
SA
CR
GlR
?D
iscussw
ithlicensee.
Ieliminated
thisbecau
seIdidn’t
believew
hatw
asgiven
would
getm
eto
theS
evereaccident
guidelines.
Fuesday,M
arch12,
2013changes
made
areok.
034A1
.02F
uelH
andlingE
quip
men
tS
ystem
(FH
ES
)A
bilityto
pred
ictan
dI
or
mo
nito
rch
anges
inparam
etersto
prev
ent
exceed
ing
desig
nlim
itsasso
ciatedw
ithth
eF
uelH
andlingS
ystem
E/U
contro
lsincluding:
(CF
R41.5
!45.5)
84F
1-2X
1.W
hyis
itnecessary
toinclude
the216’
10”?If no
reasondelete
it?2.
This
questionw
hileim
portantthe
firstpart
iskind
oftrivial
andI
doubtanyone
would
notknow
this.T
hesecond
partis
most
definitelyS
RO
only.
—
3.K
Aap
pearsto
match
.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7L
OK
LO
D(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
___________________________
_____________________
________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
——
—F
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#L
OKL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
4.D
oesthe
coreoff
loadw
ithtransfer
gatevalve
givecredibility
tothe
leveldecrease?
5.D
on’tbelieve
thatsecond
partsof
Band
Dare
plausible.A
dequatevolum
e...Iw
ouldrather
seesom
ethingthat
pertainsto
theradiation
levelsin
theB
uilding.E
IST
uesday,M
arch12,
20131.
With
thew
aterlevel
asdescribed
inthe
question,w
illthere
be10
feetof
water
asdescribed
inthe
handoutm
aterialprovided?
Iamnot
surethat
thisis
trueand
thereforem
ayhave
two
answers.
Discuss
with
licensee.—
——
——
——
—
__
__
__
——
——
2.O
therwise
chan
ges
made
app
earto
havefixed
theinitial
concerns.039G
2.2.251
Main
andR
eheatS
teamS
ystem(M
RSS)
Know
ledgeof
theb
asesin
Technical
Specifications
forlim
itingconditions
foroperations
andsafety
limits:
(CFR
41.5/
41.7/
43.2)
x1.
KA
app
earsto
match.
2.D
istractorsA
andB
secondpart
do
esnot
make
sense
forthe
Main
Steam
Safety
Valves.
Itdoesnot
standto
reasonthat
anS
RO
would
notunderstand
thedifference
between
theM
SS
Vs
andthe
AR
Vs
andnot
beable
todeterm
inethat
theM
SS
Vs
thatthe
operatorshave
nocontrol
ofare,
andare
notused
for85
F2
cooldown.
This
isbasic
knowledge
thatan
RO
knows.
3.D
istractorsB
andD
firstpart
arealso
NO
Tplausible.
The
operatorknow
sthat
thesprings
determine
with
thesize
ofthe
seatarea
determine
theset
point.A
dditionally,the
firstquestion
inthe
stemasks
forthe
RE
ASO
Nthis
isN
OT
areason
itisa
E/U
statemen
tof
design.4.
Three
ofthe
4distractors
arenot
plausible.O
nlythe
answer
isplausible.
U.
rhequestion
need
sto
becom
pletelyredesigned.
Discuss
with
BC
andlicensee
why.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
Q#
LOK
LO
D(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
___________________________
_____________________
________
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Q=
SR
O—
Focus
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.LO
KL
OD
——
——
__
__
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
IEIS
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
uesday,M
arch12,
2013
1.Q
uestionw
aschanged
toallow
foru
sage
ofT
Sm
aterial.W
hatexactly
isgoing
tobe
providedto
applicants?2.
This
newchange
requiresthe
SR
Oapplicant
tolook
upthe
valueof
therelief
setpointand
determine
ifthenum
berfalls
between
+2and
-3
ofthe
valueprovided
inT
S.W
hilethe
questiondescription
describesthat
thisis
SR
Oonly,
Idonot
believethat
thisis
reallythat.
The
pageis
providedto
asa
reference,the
valuesare
lookedup
tosee
what
theyshould
beand
thenm
ultiplythe
percentageand
determine
them
axor
mmallow
edvalue.
What
ofthis
isS
RO
knowledge?
3.S
econdpart
doesnot
make
sense
forA
andB.
Why
would
theS
RO
sbe
fooledto
primary
valuesw
henw
eare
speakingto
secondaryvalues.
Discuss
with
licenseeto
understandw
hythey
thinkthis.
lAore
need
sto
bedone.
)56AG
2.4.45L
ossof
Offsite
Pow
er,A
bilityto
prioritizeand
interpretthe
Eignificance
ofeach
annunciatoror
alarm:
(CFR
:41.10
/43.5/
45.3/
5.12)1.
What
referencesw
illbe
provided?A
sklicensee
toidentify.
2.Iw
asunable
tofind
thereference
usedto
determine
the
86H
2-3answ
er.Ineed
tohave
acopy
ofthe
Eplan
tosee
howthis
isbeing
shown
tothe
applicant.T
hism
ayor
may
notbe
Ok.3.
The
correctansw
erstates
thatitis
difficultbecau
sethe
time
beinggreater
than15
minutes
iskey.
Well
Iamnot
surethat
thisis
thatdifficultto
determine,
especiallyw
henit
islisted
as20
minutes
ago.Itw
ouldbe
betterifa
truetim
elinew
asused
and
ES
-401,R
ev.9
LO
K(F/H
)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
7
Explanation
theindividual
atleast
hasto
figureout
fromthe
times
givenhow
much
time
hasgone
by.It
isconfusing
thelisting
ofall
thealarm
sis
underthe
titleC
urrentconditions
andA
larms.
After
thelast
alarmthere
isa
statement
ALL
occurred20
minutes
ago.FIX
:change
tohave
thealarm
scom
ein
areasonable
timeline
sothe
applicantscan
determine
howlong
agothe
evenstarted.
4.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.
Enhancem
entsthat
needto
bead
dressed
will
make
thequestion
Ok.
“i,M
arch12,
2013
1.C
hangesm
adeare
ok.2.
Would
stilllike
tosee
what
referenceis
beingprovided.
Q#
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
Q#
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Q=
SR
OLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
LO
K(F/H
)
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s
Stem
Focus
Cues’
T/F
Cred.
Dist.
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s
Partial
Job-Link
Minutia
7.
Explanation
5.O
ther
#/B
ack-Q
=S
RO
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
6.
U/E
/S
It’
)uestionis
sat
)62G2.2.44,
New
,H
igher
1.In
thestem
put7”
insidethe
parenthesis.2.
Should
insecond
partof
distractorsA
andC
theO
NL
Ybe
bette87
H2-3
Sidentified,
forexam
plecapitalize,
boldor
something
soitis
notm
issed.3.
Otherw
isequestion
app
earsto
beSA
T.
Aake
minor
changes.
88H
1-2X
XX
XE
63A2.02,
Modified,
Higher
——
——
—1.
Question
does
notap
pear
tom
eto
beS
RO
only.T
hequestion
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
(F
/H
)(1
-5
)
__________________________
______________________
__
__
__
__
_
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
TIEJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
=S
RO
Focus
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
OtherJ
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D—
——
—r
—r1
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
IFC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
jOn
ly
coversbasic
knowledge
forlow
flowin
thebattery
room.
2.S
pecificallythere
couldbe
two
correctansw
ers.D
istracterC
couldbe
alsocorrect.
The
secondpart
iscorrect and
isidentified
inthe
AR
P.Itactually
speaksto
temperature
limitof
theroom
.N
ot sureifthere
isa
TSbattery
roomtem
perature.3.
How
ever,w
hatIs
theTS
batteryroom
temp
limit,
isthere
one?4.
There
isno
referencethatspeaks
tothe
hydrogenconcentration
inthe
roombeing
anissue.
Itmakes
sense
butnot
addressed
bythe
information
providedby
licensee.D
iscussw
ithlicensee
5.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.6.
Very
lowlevel
C/A
question.
Discuss
with
licensee.
I
)65AA
2.05,N
ew,
Higher,
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Disagree
with
questionbeing
SR
Olevel.
3.S
ourcesof
water
tothe
aircom
pressorsis
notS
RO
knowledge.
89H
2X
XU
4.D
oesnot
reallym
eetthe
SR
Olevel.
Discuss
with
licensee.5.
Second
partcould
bean
answer
if aircannot
berestored.
Discuss
with
licensee.
4N
eedto
revisitthis
question.W
illdiscuss
with
anotherexam
inerto
seevhat
theythink.
ES
-401,
Rev.
9W
ritten
Exam
ination
Review
Worksheet
Form
ES
-4
01
-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7Q
#L
OK
LO
D(Ff1-I)
(1-5)
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
UIE
ISE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.J3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
Stem
Cues
T/F
Cred.
Partial
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
U/E
/SE
xplanationF
ocusD
ist.Link
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
——
——
—
urren
tlyevaluate
thisas
aU
.
l76AG
2.2.22,N
ew,
Higher.
;::,
1.T
heansw
eras
written
isnot
correctin
that,it
isa
small
fractionof
the1O
CFR
100L
imits
duringa
SG
TR
accidentand
thatis
.lim
itedto
thefirst
2hours
ofthe
accident.L
icenseehas
tolook
atthis
andsee
what
ifanythinghas
tobe
done.C
ouldthis
bea
cause
forsaying
thisdo
esnot
haveansw
er?2.
Firstpart
ofthe
questionis
adirect
readfrom
thegraph.
90H
2?
E/U
3.Q
uestionis
SR
Oonly
however
notvery
challenging.Itis
basicallya
mem
orylevel
questionw
ithgraph
usage.4.
Second
partof
distractorsB
andD
do
esnot
make
sense.
Discuss
with
examiners
andB
Cw
hy.S
tatement
activitydo
es-
notinterfere
with
detectionof
leakagein
containment
doesnot
make
sense..
Ask
BC
.
valu
atedas
anU
.D
iscussw
ithother
examiner
beforesending
to:i.--
icensee.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7Q
#L
OK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
____________________________________________________
__
__
__
__
_
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LOK
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#/B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
086G2.2.37
FireP
rotectionS
ystem(F
PS
).A
bilityto
determine
operabilityand/or
availabilityof
safetyrelated
equipment:
(CFR
41.7/
43.5/
45.12):
1.R
eferenceprovided
inthis
questionis
identified.Is
thereference
highlightedin
thereference
areathe
ON
LY
one?2.
Icannotfind
procedure92040-C
,“Fire
Protection
Operability
andL
CO
requirements.”
3.IS
theprocedure
in2
aprocedure
thatall
SR
O5
areexpected
toH
2-3E
/Uknow
?A
dditionally,do
RO
applicantshave
anyrequirem
entsfor
mem
oryof
items
inthis
procedure?4.
Need
tosee
theprocedure
todeterm
ineifthis
meets
theS
RO
ON
LY
.Irealize
thatthere
isan
SR
Oonly
LObut
seeneed
tolook
atthe
material.
Trust
butverify.
hisd
oes
notap
pear
tobe
avery
highlevel
questionother
thanhaving
tonow
setpointsand
tanklevels.
Need
tolook
atthe
material
andw
hatis
91??
feing
providedduring
theexam
inationto
determine
ifthisis
sator
not.
Feb
ruary
28,2013
1.R
eceivedthe
procedurefrom
thelicensee.
Need
todiscuss
what
theR
Os
responsibilityis
concerningthis
procedure.T
he302,000
galsis
abovethe
linein
theO
perability.Is
theR
OH
2-3U
expectedto
knowthis
asin
TS
5?Ifso
thenthis
firstpart
ofthe
questionis
unsat.2.
Question
isa
lowlevel
ofdifficulty.
3.A
fterreview
ingthe
procedureIbelieve
thisis
UN
SAT
andnot
——
SR
Oonly.
Need
todiscuss
with
licensee.4.
Discuss
with
licenseeto
understandtheir
pointof
view.
ruesday,M
arch12,
2013M
1-2E
1.Q
uestionhas
beencom
pletelyreplaced.
2.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.3.
Level
ofdifficulty
isvery
low.
The
levelof
questionis
nothigher
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
LO
K(F/H
)
2.3.
Psychom
etricF
laws
4.Job
Content
Flaw
s5.
Other
6.7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
——
——
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
itis
mem
ory.T
hereis
noanalysis
onlyrem
embering
ifaclosed
pressurizerblocked
safetyvalve
beingclosed
causes
theP
RZ
Rsafety
valveto
beclosed
blockvalve.
This
seems
tobe
trivialand
nota
C/A
question.H
avelicensee
discussthis.
Generic
Com
ments
concerningthe
SR
Oonly
questions.
Up
tothis
pointin
theexam
most
ofthe
SR
Oquestions
arenot
verychallenging.
They
arenot
complex
concerningcom
binationsof
knowledge’s
thathave
beendeveloped
forquestioning.
.1.O5
New
,M
emory.
1.S
temasks
tocom
pletethe
statement
oris
itstatemen
ts?2.
KA
app
earsto
match.
3.D
istractorB
andD
use8
hoursfor
secondpart.
Analysis
statesthis
was
anold
TS.
When
was
thisT
Schanged?
During
thisclass?
IFnot
duringthis
classit
isN
OT
aplausible
distractor.D
iscussw
ithlicensee
when
them
odificationoccurred.
Band
Dsecond
time
haveto
bechanged.
The
applicantother
thanS
RO
upgradesw
erenot
exposedto
thattim
efor
reset.N
eedsa
bettertim
ethan
8.92
F1-2
XX
XX
4.H
owm
anypeople
onvalidation
gotthis
questionw
rong?A
nyone?5.
Does
notthe
RO
shave
toknow
what
theirreset
time
is?S
eems
theydo.
Discuss
with
examiners
andlicensees.
2.L
OD
(1-5)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther6.
U/E
/S
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
QS
RO
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.3._P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#LO
KL
OD
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
2.2.15,B
ank,H
igher
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
There
isan
extraunderscore
afterthe
word
MIN
IMU
Mand
beforethe
word
post.M
INIM
UM
_post”3.
Put
the“?“
inthe
paren
theses.
4.T
hisis
thefirst
questionthe
terminology
NO
TO
PER
AB
LE
isused.
Other
areasw
herethis
isdone
theterm
inologyis
inoperable.S
eequestion
91.N
eedto
usethe
same
convention
93H
2E
allthe
time.
Pickone
orthe
other.Ibelieve
itcanbe
doneeither
way.
5.U
sethe
same
fillin
theblank
asdone
inalm
ostall
otherquestions
priorto
this.6.
Question
ism
oreof
am
emory,
what
skillsare
beingused
toanalyze,
calculateor
evaluatethe
initialconditions
toansw
erthe
question.7.
Rem
ovethe
valvenum
berand
putin
stem.
Discuss
with
NR
Cexam
inersand
managem
ent.T
hisseem
sto
bethe
ihl
atw
hichthe
SR
Os
arebeing
evaluatedon
thisexam
.
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch.2.
Here
isanother
example
ofa
listedH
igherquestion
thatis
reallya
mem
orylevel
typequestion.
We
needto
ensurethat
we
donot
havelots
ofthis
typeof
questions.
94H
2S
3.Itis
simple
onedim
ensionalquestion
thatdoes
notrequire
much
ifanyother
skillsother
thanm
emory.
j
4.N
eedto
ensurew
ehave
enoughC
/Aquestions
forthe
entireexam
.5.
While
thisquestion
issat
Iwould
ratherreplace
thisquestion.
Need
tohave
anotherC
hiefE
xaminer
lookat
thisand
theB
Cto
lookat
also
2.2
.2O
,N
EW
,H
igher
LOK
(F/H)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
7.
Explanation
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
2.L
OD
(1-5)
12.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#L
OK
LO
D—
——
——
—
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
-—
---—
——
--—
--—
32.3.04,B
ank,Farley,
Mem
ory
KA
app
earsto
beOk
This
isG
FE
information.
Not
sosure
thisis
thebest
way
totest
thistopic.
Will
lookat
therest
andask
otherexam
inersto
determine
ifthisshould
stay.It
iskind
oftrivial
forthe
SR
Oknow
ledge.T
hisshould
bealso
known
bythe
RO
applicants.D
iscussw
ithB
C.
Radiation
Control:
Ability
tocom
plyw
ithrad
iation
work
perm
itreq
uirem
ents
durin
gnorm
alor
abnorm
alco
nd
ition
s:(C
FR
41
.12
14
5.1
0)
28,2013
KA
appears
tobe
Ok.
Question
do
esnot
app
earto
beS
RO
only.T
hesam
erequirem
entsapply
toan
RO
andan
RO
need
sto
beable
todo
thiscalculation
also.T
hisis
GF
ES
material.
ON
LY
indistractors
Cand
Dshould
becapitalized
orby
whatever
conventionis
usedw
henusing
ON
LY
.It m
akesno
differencehow
yourdo
thisjust
make
surethat
itis
doneconsistently.D
iscussedthis
with
otherexam
inersand
determined
thatthis
issufficientto
testthe
SR
Oapplicant
inthis
area.
Q#
LO
K(F/H
)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#/
Back-
Linkunits
ward
6.
UIE
IS
Q=
SR
OK
/AO
nly
95F
7.
Explanation
2?
1.2.3.4.
A
96H
2-3
1.2.
uestionhas
minor
enhan
cemen
tsand
thereforeis
evaluatedas
Satisfactory.
ITuesday,
March
12,2013
1.M
adech
ang
esabove
asrequested.
2.A
gainon
thesim
pleside.
Discuss
with
BC
andexam
iners.
ES
-401,R
ev.9
2.
LC
D
(1-5
)
Wriften
Exam
inatio
nR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Q=
SR
O
KJA
On
ly
Form
ES
-401-9
2.
3.
Psy
chom
etric
Fla
ws
4.
Job
Conte
nt
Fla
ws
5.O
therJ6.
7.
Q#
LO
KL
OD
—F
—F
——
r1
(F/H
)(1
-5)
Ste
mC
ues
T/F
Cre
d.
Partia
lJo
b-
iMin
utia
#1B
ack-
QIS
0U
/E/S
Expla
natio
n
Fo
cu
sD
ist.L
ink
units
ward
K/A
IOnIyj3.2.4.2
9,
Mod
HL
-17
NR
C,
mem
ory
.
1.K
Aapp
ears
tom
atc
h.
97F
2S
2.A
ppearsto
beOk
-43.
Again
itis
am
emory
question.
nequestion
issatisfactory.
Over
alltestingof
C/A
questio
ns
ism
inim
al.
.4.4
0,
Bank,
Mem
ory
1.K
Aappears
tom
atc
h.
2.P
utthe
“?“
inth
epare
nth
esis
.
3.M
ostof
theoth
er
two
partq
uestio
ns
were
develo
ped
with
afill
in
the
bla
nk
co
nfig
ura
tion
.T
his
qu
estio
nis
diffe
rent?
Itis
not
98
F2-3
Sn
ecessary
tochange
un
less
you
wan
tto
mak
eth
isquestio
nlik
e
theothers.
4.M
emory
levelquestion.
Need
toensure
we
haveenough
C/A
questionsb
ecause
ofthe
chan
ges
ordiscussions
Iputforw
ardchan
gin
gC
/Aq
uestio
ns
tom
em
ory
level
questio
ns.
5.Q
uestio
nap
pears
tob
eO
k.
VE
O3E
A2.1,
Bank,
Hig
her.
99H
3S
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atch2.
Question
app
earsto
beOk
VE
O9E
A2.2,
Bank,
HL
-17,
Hig
her
1.K
Aap
pears
tom
atc
h
2.T
hisquestion
ism
uchm
orecom
plexthan
thoseabove.
Need
100H
3S
todis
cuss
with
BC
this
and
dete
rmin
eif
those
desc
ribed
ab
ov
e
are
co
mple
xenou
gh
for
the
level
exp
ecte
don
the
SR
O
exam
inatio
n.
uestio
nis
sat.
Q#
LOK
(F/H)
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
Stem
Cues
T/F
Focus
5.O
ther
Job-M
inutia#1
Back
Linkunits
ward
6.
U/E
/S
7.
Ex
pla
natio
n
ES
-401,R
ev.9
Written
Exam
inationR
eviewW
ork
sheet
Form
ES
-401-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.L
OK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
______
UIE
ISE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
T/F
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
0=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#L
OKL
OD
(F/H)
(1-5)S
temC
uesT
/FC
red.P
artialJob-
Minutia
#1B
ack-Q
SR
OU
/E/S
Explanation
Focus
Dist.
Linkunits
ward
K/A
Only
EE
ES
-401,
Rev.
9W
ritten
Exam
ination
Review
Worksheet
Form
ES
-40
1-9
1.2.
3.P
sychometric
Flaw
s4.
JobC
ontentF
laws
5.O
ther6.
7.Q
#L
OK
LO
D(F/H
)(1-5)
____________________________________________________
__
__
__
__
_
U/E
/SE
xplanation
Stem
Cues
TIF
Job-M
inutia#1
Back-
Q=
SR
OF
ocusLink
unitsw
ardK
/AO
nly
ES
-401,R
ev.
92
Form
ES
-401-9
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1Quality Checklist
Facility: Vogtle 1 & 2 Date of Exam: 5/10/13 Exam Level: RO E SRO E
Initials
Item Description a b c
1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading /2 N/A 44’2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified
/ N/Aand documented /1/4
3. Applicants’ scores checked for addition errors N/A(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) /
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 ±2% overall and 70 or 80, N/Aas_applicable,_±4%_on_the_SRO-only)_reviewed_in_detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades N/Aare justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for trainingdeficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity N/Aof questions missed by half or more of the applicants .7 -
Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader Michael G. Donithan&
b. Facility Reviewer(*) N/A
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Richard S. /1/z.vi
d. NRC Supervisor (*) Mark E. Frank’ -
(*) The facility reviewer’s signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC;two independent NRC reviews are required.
![5 DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL R 201 4 [201 Examination Handbook · Examination Handbook R [201 4-201 5] DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL-M CLASS: VIII EDISON DALTON DARWIN ... Debate Writing, Report Writing,](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/5b5a34927f8b9ac7498b7ec5/5-delhi-public-school-r-201-4-201-examination-examination-handbook-r-201-4-201.jpg)
![No. [4169]201 S.Y. B.Com. EXAMINATION, 2012 BUSINESS](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/61cf3b336760fd249d0be53f/no-4169201-sy-bcom-examination-2012-business-.jpg)
![[4317] – 201 - Savitribai Phule Pune University[4317] – 201 S.Y. B.Sc. (Semester – II) Examination, 2013 ... Marks : 40 1. Attempt any five of ... (Semester – II) Examination,](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/5ad5720f7f8b9a075a8ce653/4317-201-savitribai-phule-pune-university4317-201-sy-bsc-semester.jpg)