Coherent Helicity-Dependent Spin-Phonon Oscillations in the Ferromagnetic van derWaals Crystal CrI3

P. Padmanabhan,1, ∗ F. L. Buessen,2 R. Tutchton,1 K. W. C. Kwock,1, 3 S. Gilinsky,1 M.-C. Lee,1 M. A.McGuire,4 S. R. Singamaneni,5 D. A. Yarotski,1 A. Paramekanti,2, ∗ J.-X. Zhu,1, ∗ R. P. Prasankumar1, ∗

1Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA2Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S1A7, Canada

3The Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science,Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA

4Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA5Department of Physics, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA

The discovery of two-dimensional (2D) systemshosting intrinsic long-range magnetic order1 rep-resents a seminal addition to the rich physicallandscape of van der Waals (vdW) materials.CrI3 has emerged as perhaps the most salientexample, as the interdependence of crystallinestructure and magnetic order,2 along with stronglight-matter interactions3,4 provides a promisingplatform to explore the optical control of mag-netic, vibrational, and charge degrees of free-dom at the 2D limit. However, the fundamentalquestion of how this relationship between struc-ture and magnetism manifests on their intrin-sic timescales has rarely been explored. Here,we use ultrafast optical spectroscopy to probemagnetic and vibrational dynamics in CrI3, re-vealing demagnetization dynamics governed byspin-flip scattering and remarkably, a strong tran-sient exchange-mediated interaction between lat-tice vibrations and spin oscillations. The latteryields a coherent spin-coupled phonon mode thatis highly sensitive to the helicity of the drivingpulse in the magnetically ordered phase. Our re-sults shed light on the nature of spin-lattice cou-pling in vdW magnets on ultrafast timescales andhighlight their potential for applications requiringnon-thermal, high-speed control of magnetism atthe nanoscale.

Since its first demonstration,5 the ultrafast manip-ulation of magnetism has been a major topic of re-search, with significant efforts aimed at unraveling thenature of dynamic demagnetization,6,7 the excitation ofcollective magnetic modes,8,9 and the realization of all-optical switching.10–12 The recent emergence of 2D ma-terials hosting long-range magnetic order13,14 presentsa new, relatively unexplored playground to investigatethese phenomena in systems where the interplay betweenstructural order and exchange interactions plays a pivotalrole. CrI3 is a prototypical example of such a system,hosting out-of-plane ferromagnetic (FM) order down tothe monolayer limit14 stabilized by uniaxial anisotropy,which opens a gap in the low energy zone-center magnonspectrum.15 However, for even numbers of atomic layersthe relationship between stacking order and Cr-Cr su-perexchange interactions2 stabilizes an antiferromagnetic

Fig. 1. CrI3 structural and electronic properties andTRPR experimental scheme. Schematics of (a) the crys-tal structure of the low temperature R3 phase of CrI3, (b)the femtosecond TRPR experiment, where QWP is a quarterwave plate, WP is a Wollaston prism, and BD is a balanceddetector, and (c) the relevant energy levels in CrI3, wherethe red arrow denotes optical transitions at ∼ 1.5 eV thatgenerate excited electrons and holes. Dashed lines indicatethe dominant atomic orbital character of the ligand-field splitlevels. Transitions between the eg, t2u, and t1u levels signifi-cantly contribute to coherent phonon generation.

(AFM) phase with broken inversion symmetry. Thisgives rise to unique nonlinear optical phenomena4 andhighlights the strong influence of the crystal structure(Fig. 1(a)) on the magnetic order and optical response ofCrI3. Additionally, recent inelastic neutron scattering16and Raman spectroscopic17,18 measurements reveal tera-hertz (THz) optical spin-wave branches that are close inenergy to several vibrational modes in CrI3,19 pointingto the possibility of dynamic coupling between the latticeand spin degrees of freedom.20

In this letter, we uncover the nature of this couplingby measuring the transient magnetization and coherentvibrational dynamics in CrI3 after femtosecond optical

arX

iv:2

010.

0491

5v1

[co

nd-m

at.m

trl-

sci]

10

Oct

202

0

2

Fig. 2. Ultrafast photoinduced demagnetization inCrI3. Time-resolved polarization rotation signal under σ+

pumping at T = 15 K, where the blue dots are experimentaldata and the green line is a fit using the M3TM (see SI). Theoscillatory component in the M3TM fit curve was obtained byseparately fitting the oscillatory component of the experimen-tal data with a decaying sinusoidal function. The inset showsthe magnetization dynamics on shorter timescales under σ+,σ−, and linearly polarized pumping at T = 15 K.

photoexcitation. We find that the demagnetization dy-namics are driven by spin-flip scattering, while coherentpump helicity-dependent oscillations in the time-resolvedpolarization rotation (TRPR) signal highlight the stronginfluence of magnetic order on the c-axis A1g opticalphonon mode. This new insight into dynamic spin-latticecoupling in vdW magnets opens a unique pathway formanipulating magnetic order through the vibrational de-gree of freedom, with significant implications for futurenanoscale optomagnetic applications.

In our experiments, 1.55 eV, 85 fs pump and probepulses (measured at the sample position) were focusedat near-normal incidence onto as-grown bulk-like flakesof CrI3 (Curie temperature, TC = 61 K) (Fig. 1(b)).Fig. 2(a) shows the resulting TRPR signal obtained inthe FM phase at T = 15 K under right circularly polar-ized (σ+) pumping. We observe a rapid sub-picoseconddecrease in the magnetization, a further reduction overtens of picoseconds, a ∼ 16 GHz oscillation due to a co-herent strain wave, and an eventual nanosecond timescalerecovery. This two-step demagnetization process, re-ferred to as type-II dynamics, has been observed in otherferromagnets21,22 and occurs when demagnetization isnot completed before electron-phonon equilibration.6

More insight can be obtained by considering the opti-cal transitions in CrI3 following 1.55 eV excitation. Theabsorption spectrum of bulk CrI3 shows a weak resonancepeak at ∼ 1.5 eV, attributed to transitions between the

partially filled t2g and unfilled eg levels resulting fromthe octahedral ligand field-induced splitting of the Cr3+

d-orbital (Fig. 1(c)). Despite the even parity of thesestates, this transition is allowed due to mixing with var-ious odd-parity states,3 and may also be associated witha low-lying bright charge-transfer exciton.23 Regardless,below TC the 1.55 eV pump pulse drives vertical transi-tions predominantly involving majority-spin states, dueto significant spin polarization of the valence and con-duction bands.23 This leads to a strong preferential ab-sorption of σ+ light in spin-up domains at 1.55 eV.23

The strong helicity-dependent absorptivity of CrI3 sug-gests that the ultrafast magnetic response should benearly negligible for left circularly polarized (σ−) pumppulses. However, the TRPR signal under σ− pump-ing has a sign opposite to the σ+ case (Fig. 2 inset).This helicity-dependent response is preserved for all tem-peratures T < TC . We attribute this to the presenceof multiple domains within the photoexcited region;24,25i.e., spin-down domains preferentially absorb σ− photons,leading to their subsequent demagnetization. Neverthe-less, horizontally polarized pumping yields a negative sig-nal (Fig. 2 inset), implying that the volume fraction ofspin-up domains is higher in the probed region.

Accordingly, upon absorption of a σ+ pulse, majority-spin electrons and holes are excited in CrI3. Due tospin-orbit coupling (SOC), the wave functions of thesecarriers are a mixture of pure spin states.26 This allowsfor a finite probability of Elliott-Yafet spin-flip scatteringprocesses,27 which mediate spin relaxation, particularlyin the hole population due to the comparatively small va-lence band exchange splitting.23 Furthermore, the pho-toexcited carrier density of ∼ 1019 cm−3 exceeds theMott density criterion, given the nanometer-scale excitonradius,23 leading to a transient quasi-metallic state. Thismakes it possible to describe ultrafast dynamics in CrI3using the microscopic three-temperature model (M3TM),in which the excited electronic system supplies the energyfor demagnetization, while interactions with the latticeallow for angular momentum dissipation.6 A fit to thedemagnetization dynamics with the M3TM (Fig. 2) ac-curately reproduces both demagnetization steps with aspin-flip probability of asf = 0.175, consistent with othermaterials showing type-II dynamics.21,22 More detail isincluded in the supplementary information (SI).

We now turn our attention to the coherent dynam-ics. The top panel of Fig. 3(a) shows the TRPR sig-nal at T = 75 K > Tc under σ+ and σ− pumping aftersubtracting the demagnetization background discussedabove, revealing pronounced coherent oscillations. Thepower spectral density (PSD) in the bottom panel re-veals two distinct modes at ∼ 3.87 THz and ∼ 2.37 THz,corresponding to c-axis (A2

1g) and in-plane (A11g) Raman-

active phonons, respectively.17–19 These modes are ex-cited via impulsive stimulated Raman scattering (ISRS),which is permitted by their A1g symmetry.18

Notably, the PSD of both modes is nearly identical forboth pump helicities above TC . However, this symmetry

3

Fig. 3. Coherent spin-coupled phonon dynamics as a function of temperature. Oscillations in the time-domainsignals (upper panel) after subtraction of the demagnetization background, under σ+ (blue) and σ− (red) pumping, and theircorresponding power spectral densities (PSD, lower panel) at (a) T = 75 K and (b) T = 15 K. The inset of (a) shows a schematicof the eigenvectors associated with the two phonon modes. (c) The σ+/σ− ratio of the integrated Fourier transform peaksof the measured signal at the A1

1g (orange) and A21g (green) mode frequencies, and the simulated helicity-dependent ratio at

the A21g frequency (pink) vs. normalized temperature. The solid green line is a fit using a FM order-parameter-like function

∝√TC − T and the solid orange line is a guide to the eye. Error bars were obtained from a bootstrap sampling analysis.

is broken below TC , where σ− pumping leads to a smallerA2

1g amplitude (Fig. 3(b)). In contrast, the A11g mode

remains relatively invariant to the choice of pump polar-ization. This can be seen in Fig. 3(c), where we plotthe σ+/σ− ratio of the integrated spectral peaks of bothoscillatory modes vs. T . Here, the A2

1g ratio below TCconsistently follows a FM order-parameter-like function,∝√TC − T , similar to the case of THz magnons.17 This

highlights that the coherent amplitude of the A21g mode

is especially sensitive to the underlying magnetic order inthe system. In contrast, the A1

1g mode ratio shows mini-mal variation with temperature. This difference is strik-ing, and suggests that the helicity dependence of the A2

1g

mode does not originate from a dominant optical effect(i.e., the larger absorptivity of σ+ light in CrI3 belowTC), as this would impact the two modes in a similarmanner. Additionally, the diagonal Raman tensors as-sociated with both A1g modes eliminates the possibilitythat the helicity-dependence originates from the form ofthe ISRS selection rule.17

Instead, to understand the clear sensitivity of theA2

1g mode to the underlying magnetic order, we re-call that this mode corresponds to a c-axis oscillationof iodine atoms (lower panel of Fig. 3(a)), leading toan oscillatory trigonal distortion of the CrI6 octahedra.This distortion can transiently modulate spin exchangeinteractions through anisotropy- or exchange-mediatedpathways.20,28 This is even more likely in CrI3, giventhe close energetic proximity between the A1g phononmodes and Raman-active magnons.17,18 We confirmedthis using density functional theory (DFT) to calculate∆E = EFM − EAFM, the energy difference per spin be-tween FM and AFM configurations, which is a measure ofthe overall exchange strength. Tracking its dependenceon the lattice displacement, X, of the A2

1g phonon yields

∂∆E/∂X ≈ −32 meV/Å per Cr atom, signaling the im-portance of spin-lattice coupling in CrI3. Here, X > 0denotes trigonal compression of the CrI6 octahedra.

To explain the helicity-dependent TRPR, we then de-veloped a spin-phonon model for CrI3. This describesS=3/2 Cr moments on an N -site honeycomb lattice in-teracting via nearest-neighbor exchange interactions andcoupled to the global A2

1g phonon displacement. The to-tal Hamiltonian is H = Hph +Hsp, with the phonon termHph = P 2/2M + MΩ2X2/2. Here P is the momentum,M/N ≈ 6.3 × 10−25 kg is the mass of the three iodineatoms per Cr spin, and Ω ≈ 3.87 THz is the A2

1g phononfrequency. The spin Hamiltonian is

Hsp =∑〈rr′〉γ

[JHSr ·Sr′+JKS

γr S

γr′+JΓ

(Sαr S

βr′+S

βr S

αr′)]

(1)

where 〈rr′〉 denotes nearest-neighbor sites, JH is aHeisenberg coupling, and the bond-anisotropic interac-tions JK and JΓ correspond to Kitaev and off-diagonalsymmetric exchange, respectively.15 The superscript γdenotes the direction of the bond, with (α, β) ⊥ γ.The weaker interlayer couplings in bulk CrI316 are notexpected to qualitatively impact our results, justifyingthis monolayer model. The A2

1g lattice distortion mod-ifies the exchange constants as Ji = Ji(1 +φiX), withspin-phonon coupling parameters φi (i = H,K,Γ). Wefix (JH , JK , JΓ) = (−1.3,−3.0,−0.5) meV to reasonablycapture the spin-wave dispersion15,16 and the monolayerTC , and set (φH , φK) = (6,−3) Å−1 to reproduce ourDFT results for (∂∆E/∂X) (see SI). For T TC ,our model predicts an equilibrium displacement 〈X〉 ∼5 × 10−4Å, comparable to the experimentally estimatedmagnetostriction.29

Using this spin-phonon model, we simulate the impact

4

of the pump pulse as an instantaneous helicity-dependentlattice distortion, X±(t=0)=X + ξ1 (1± ξ2m). Here, Xand m are the equilibrium lattice displacement and mag-netization respectively, and the signs ± correspond to theσ± pump helicity. ξ1 determines the overall strength ofthe distortion due to the Raman process, and ξ2 repre-sents its helicity dependence; the latter can arise fromthe spin selectivity of the helicity-dependent photoexci-tation, which transiently enhances or suppresses the localCr moment.30 We solve for the subsequent dynamics ofthe spin-phonon system by numerically integrating thecoupled equations of motion (see Methods). For T > TC ,we find persistent oscillations in X±(t) at the phonon fre-quency Ω, while the uniform magnetization m±(t) doesnot exhibit coherent dynamics. Remarkably, in the FMphase (T < TC), the distortion leads to coupled, coherentoscillations in X±(t) and the magnetization m±(t) at Ω(see SI). The coherent m±(t) oscillations lead to oscilla-tions in the polarization rotation, creating an additionaltemperature and helicity-dependent contribution to theTRPR signal below TC . Setting ξ2 = 0.18/µB, we findthat m

+(Ω)/m−(Ω) plotted vs. T/TC shows excellent

agreement with the experimental TRPR ratio below TC(Fig. 3(c)).

Ultimately, the overarching physical mechanism under-lying the helicity-dependent response of the A2

1g modecenters upon the coherent coupling between the magne-tization and the A2

1g phonon. Above TC , the femtosec-ond optical pump drives transitions involving the Cr-likeeg level. The partial occupation of this level leads toa strongly Jahn-Teller active ion, causing the system toundergo an ultrafast trigonal distortion that triggers thecoherent phonon mode. Below TC , the modulation ofthe spin exchange by this phonon mode leads to the in-tertwining of lattice vibrations and coherent spin oscil-lations. Moreover, transitions from strongly iodine-likestates (e.g., T1u and T2u, see Fig.1(c)) lead to helicity-dependent changes in the local magnetization, transientlyenhancing (suppressing) it under σ+ (σ−) photoexcita-tion in a majority spin-up photoexcited volume. Asshown above, this contributes a helicity-dependent com-ponent to the impulsive lattice distortion, akin to a dy-namic magnetostriction process.

In conclusion, our measurements and simulations high-light the inextricable link between magnetic order andstructure in CrI3, due to the intimate relationship be-tween the strength of exchange interactions, trigonal lat-tice distortions, and the orbital character of the statesinvolved in the photoexcitation process. This in turn al-lows for greater flexibility in the manipulation of magne-tization and vibrational dynamics in 2D materials, espe-cially using all-optical techniques that exploit nonlinearprocesses to drive coherent phenomena. Finally, our re-sults shed new light on the immense potential for CrI3and similar 2D magnetic materials in the next genera-tion of optomagnetic technologies, and also provide in-sight into enabling ultrafast optical control of magnetismat the atomic limit.

I. METHODS

A. Time-resolved experiments

Bulk-like flakes of CrI3, grown using chemical vaportransport, were deposited onto an Au coated sampleholder and placed in a variable temperature liquid heliumflow optical cryostat. Ultrafast pulses were supplied bya regeneratively amplified Ti:Sapphire laser, which gen-erated pulses with an 800 nm central wavelength, 85 fsduration (measured at the sample position), and 100 kHzrepetition rate. The beam was split into pump and probearms using a plate beam splitter. The pump beam wassent through a mechanical delay line, and both beamswere passed through achromatic wave plates and subse-quently focused onto optically flat regions of the sampleat near-normal incidence using a 20X near-IR optimizedapochromatic objective. The nominal 1/e2 focal spot di-ameter of the probe was approximately 10−15 µm, andthe pump was approximately 20 µm, yielding a pumpfluence of ∼ 0.64 mJ cm−2. We performed experimentswhere the pump polarization was horizontally polarized(i.e., parallel to the optical table surface), right circularlypolarized, and left circularly polarized. The probe beamwas linearly polarized, and upon reflection, the beam wasdecomposed into its two orthogonal linear componentsusing a Wollaston prism. These components were thendifferentially detected using a balanced Si photodiode de-tector and the output signal was fed into a lock-in am-plifier to isolate the TRPR signal. Both the pump andprobe beams were modulated using a 7/5 slotted opticalchopper, allowing the lock-in amplifier to be referencedto the sum inter-modulation frequency (1.2 kHz) to elim-inate pump scattering effects.

B. Density functional theory calculations

Our ab initio simulations were carried out within den-sity functional theory. We used both the pseudopoten-tial plane wave method implemented in the Vienna abinitio simulation package (VASP)31,32 and in QuantumEspresso (QE), and the full-potential all-electron lin-earized augmented plane wave (FP-LAPW) method im-plemented in the Wien2k code.33 The local density ap-proximation was used for the exchange-correlation func-tional throughout all our ab initio simulations. For theVASP calculations, we chose an energy cutoff of 500 eVfor the plane-wave basis set and used a 10 × 10 × 10(10×10×3) Γ-centered k-point mesh to sample the bulk(monolayer) Brillouin zone to perform the structure op-timization, Γ-point phonon, Raman tensor (aided withthe vasp_raman python script34), and electronic struc-ture calculations. The QE calculations used a plane-wavebasis set with a cutoff energy of 60 Ry. A 10× 10× 10 k-point mesh was used to calculate the electronic structureof bulk CrI3 and to support a calculation of the phonondispersion at the Γ-point. In the Wien2k simulations, we

5

focused on calculating the electronic band structure forbulk CrI3 by taking a 15× 15× 15 k-point mesh with amuffin-tin radius of 2.5a0 (Cr) and 2.35a0 (I). Here a0 isthe Bohr radius.

We also used VASP to perform total energy calcula-tions for the FM and AFM states of a CrI3 monolayer,from which a Heisenberg model with nearest-neighborexchange interactions was fit to obtain the exchange in-teraction. The spin-lattice coupling strength was thendetermined by distorting the equilibrium lattice accord-ing to the displacement field for a chosen vibration mode.The electronic structure obtained in our simulations onboth bulk and 2D CrI3 is consistent with those reportedin the literature.19,35,36 We note that SOC reduces theband gap. However, since SOC does not qualitativelychange the lattice dynamics,19 we did not include it inthe calculation of the Raman tensor and estimate of thespin-lattice coupling strength.

C. Monte Carlo simulations

We performed classical Monte Carlo simulations on thecoupled spin-phonon system described by the Hamilto-nian H = Hph + Hsp to generate a thermal ensembleof states. We studied lattices of 2 × L × L spins, withsystem sizes up to L = 48, with periodic boundary condi-tions. To improve the statistical convergence of the sim-ulations, we employed a parallel tempering scheme37 tosimulate 144 logarithmically spaced temperature pointsbetween Tmin ≈ 7 K and Tmax ≈ 90 K in parallel. Eachsimulation was equilibrated for 106 sweeps before tak-ing measurements of the specific heat and the equilib-rium magnetization for an additional 107 sweeps; a sin-gle sweep is defined as one attempted update per spin orphonon degree of freedom. As shown in the SI, the cho-sen coupling constants reasonably reproduce the experi-mental spin-wave dispersion.16 In addition, the computedtemperature-dependent specific heat and magnetizationyield a TC in reasonable agreement with experiments.

D. Dynamical simulations

We modeled the impact of the pump laser as a helicity-dependent lattice distortion, given by X±(t = 0) =X + ξ1 (1 + σξ2m) at time t = 0. Here, X is the equilib-

rium lattice displacement, m is the equilibrium magne-tization of the spin configuration, and the sign ± distin-guishes σ+ and σ− pump pulses. Such a distortion couldarise from an ultrafast trigonal splitting of a photoex-cited Jahn-Teller active Cr eg level, with the splittingbeing sensitive to the local Cr spin due to Hund’s cou-pling. We applied this ultrafast distortion to individualconfigurations selected from our Monte Carlo ensemblewith L = 32. The post-distortion dynamics were de-scribed using the Landau-Lifshitz equations for spins,

hdSxrdt

=∑

γ=x,y,z

JH(SzrS

zrx−S

yrS

zrx

)+JK

(SzrS

yry−S

yrS

zrz

)+JΓ

(SzrS

zrx+SzrS

zrz−S

yrS

yrx−S

yrS

xry

), (2)

with cyclic permutations of (x, y, z) yielding dSyr /dt anddSzr/dt, coupled with Newton’s equations for the lattice

dX

dt=

P

Mand

dP

dt= −MΩ2X − ∂Hspin

∂X. (3)

In equation (2), rγ denotes the nearest-neighbor latticesite of r along bond direction γ. These equations werenumerically integrated using a ninth-order Runge-Kuttaalgorithm38 and adaptive time steps with a local rela-tive error tolerance of εrel = 10−13. This yielded con-verged results up to timescales of approximately 25 ps inthe magnetically ordered phase. We averaged the result-ing dynamical observables over 2000 Monte Carlo con-figurations with positive magnetization (when projectedonto the twofold degenerate polarization axis). In par-ticular, we extracted the time-dependent deviation of themagnetization, ∆m±(t) = 〈m±(t)〉 −m, where m is themean magnetization in thermal equilibrium and 〈m±(t)〉is the time-dependent magnetization after the ultrafastσ±-helicity-dependent distortion was applied. We deter-mined the ratio of Fourier componentsm+(Ω)/m−(Ω) bycalculating the Fourier transformm±(Ω) = FT(∆m±(t))and fitting a Gaussian profile to the peak found at theA2

1g phonon frequency Ω. The ratio m+(Ω)/m−(Ω) isindependent of the overall distortion ξ1, while a helicity-dependent splitting ξ2 ≈ 0.18/µB was found to reproduceour experimental results below TC . Additional resultson the time-resolved magnetization and phonon displace-ment are shown in the SI. Finally, our results are qualita-tively robust upon tuning the Hamiltonian parameters,as long as there are at least two exchange interactionswith distinct spin-phonon couplings.

∗ Authors to whom correspondence shouldbe addressed: prashpad@lanl.gov,arun.paramekanti@physics.utoronto.ca, jxzhu@lanl.gov,rpprasan@lanl.gov

1 Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J.-G. Magnetism intwo-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563, 47–

52 (2018).2 Sivadas, N., Okamoto, S., Xu, X., Fennie, C. J. & Xiao,D. Stacking-Dependent Magnetism in Bilayer CrI3. NanoLetters 18, 7658–7664 (2018).

3 Seyler, K. L. et al. Ligand-field helical luminescence in a2D ferromagnetic insulator. Nature Physics 14, 277–281

6

(2018).4 Sun, Z. et al. Giant nonreciprocal second-harmonic gen-eration from antiferromagnetic bilayer CrI3. Nature 572,497–501 (2019).

5 Beaurepaire, E., Merle, J.-C., Daunois, A. & Bigot, J.-Y.Ultrafast Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nickel. PhysicalReview Letters 76, 4250–4253 (1996).

6 Koopmans, B. et al. Explaining the paradoxical diversity ofultrafast laser-induced demagnetization. Nature Materials9, 259–265 (2010).

7 Afanasiev, D. et al. Ultrafast Spin Dynamics inPhotodoped Spin-Orbit Mott Insulator Sr2IrO4. PhysicalReview X 9, 021020 (2019).

8 Padmanabhan, P. et al. Optically Driven Collective SpinExcitations and Magnetization Dynamics in the Néel-typeSkyrmion Host GaV4S8. Physical Review Letters 122,107203 (2019).

9 Tzschaschel, C., Satoh, T. & Fiebig, M. Tracking the ul-trafast motion of an antiferromagnetic order parameter.Nature Communications 10, 3995 (2019).

10 Mangin, S. et al. Engineered materials for all-opticalhelicity-dependent magnetic switching. Nature Materials13, 286–292 (2014).

11 Stupakiewicz, A., Szerenos, K., Afanasiev, D., Kirilyuk,A. & Kimel, A. V. Ultrafast nonthermal photo-magneticrecording in a transparent medium. Nature 542, 71–74(2017).

12 Schlauderer, S. et al. Temporal and spectral fingerprints ofultrafast all-coherent spin switching. Nature 569, 383–387(2019).

13 Gong, C. et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism intwo-dimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature 546, 265–269 (2017).

14 Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a vander Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature546, 270–273 (2017).

15 Lee, I. et al. Fundamental Spin Interactions Underlyingthe Magnetic Anisotropy in the Kitaev Ferromagnet CrI3.Physical Review Letters 124, 17201 (2020).

16 Chen, L. et al. Topological Spin Excitations in HoneycombFerromagnet CrI3. Physical Review X 8, 041028 (2018).

17 Jin, W. et al. Raman fingerprint of two terahertz spin wavebranches in a two-dimensional honeycomb Ising ferromag-net. Nature Communications 9, 5122 (2018).

18 Li, S. et al. Magnetic-Field-Induced Quantum Phase Tran-sitions in a van der Waals Magnet. Physical Review X 10,011075 (2020).

19 Webster, L., Liang, L. & Yan, J.-A. Distinct spin–latticeand spin–phonon interactions in monolayer magnetic CrI3.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 20, 23546–23555(2018).

20 Streib, S., Vidal-Silva, N., Shen, K. & Bauer, G. E. W.Magnon-phonon interactions in magnetic insulators. Phys-ical Review B 99, 184442 (2019).

21 Kim, J.-W., Lee, K.-D., Jeong, J.-W. & Shin, S.-C. Ultra-fast spin demagnetization by nonthermal electrons of TbFealloy film. Applied Physics Letters 94, 192506 (2009).

22 Günther, S. et al. Testing spin-flip scattering as a pos-sible mechanism of ultrafast demagnetization in orderedmagnetic alloys. Physical Review B 90, 180407 (2014).

23 Wu, M., Li, Z., Cao, T. & Louie, S. G. Physical originof giant excitonic and magneto-optical responses in two-dimensional ferromagnetic insulators. Nature Communi-cations 10, 2371 (2019).

24 McGuire, M. A., Dixit, H., Cooper, V. R. & Sales, B. C.Coupling of Crystal Structure and Magnetism in the Lay-ered, Ferromagnetic Insulator CrI3. Chemistry of Materials27, 612–620 (2015).

25 Zhong, D. et al. Van der Waals engineering of ferro-magnetic semiconductor heterostructures for spin and val-leytronics. Science Advances 3, 1–7 (2017).

26 Carva, K., Battiato, M. & Oppeneer, P. M. Ab Initio Inves-tigation of the Elliott-Yafet Electron-Phonon Mechanismin Laser-Induced Ultrafast Demagnetization. Physical Re-view Letters 107, 207201 (2011).

27 Steiauf, D. & Fähnle, M. Elliott-Yafet mechanism and thediscussion of femtosecond magnetization dynamics. Phys-ical Review B 79, 140401 (2009).

28 Liu, H., Chaloupka, J. & Khaliullin, G. Kitaev Spin Liq-uid in 3d Transition Metal Compounds. Physical ReviewLetters 125, 3–8 (2020).

29 Jiang, S., Xie, H., Shan, J. & Mak, K. F. Exchange mag-netostriction in two-dimensional antiferromagnets. NatureMaterials (2020).

30 Ron, A. et al. Ultrafast enhancement of ferromagneticspin exchange induced by ligand-to-metal charge transfer.arXiv:1910.06376 (2019).

31 Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics forliquid metals. Physical Review B 47, 558–561 (1993).

32 Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemesfor ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wavebasis set. Physical Review B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

33 Blaha, P. et al. WIEN2k: An APW+lo program for cal-culating the properties of solids. The Journal of ChemicalPhysics 152, 074101 (2020).

34 Fonari, A. & Stauffer, S. vasp_raman.py(https://github.com/raman-sc/VASP/, 2013). URLhttps://github.com/raman-sc/VASP/.

35 Kumar Gudelli, V. & Guo, G.-Y. Magnetism and magneto-optical effects in bulk and few-layer CrI3 : a theoreticalGGA + U study. New Journal of Physics 21, 053012(2019).

36 Lado, J. L. & Fernández-Rossier, J. On the origin of mag-netic anisotropy in two dimensional CrI3. 2D Materials 4,035002 (2017).

37 Hukushima, K. & Nemoto, K. Exchange Monte CarloMethod and Application to Spin Glass Simulations. Jour-nal of the Physical Society of Japan 65, 1604–1608 (1996).

38 Rackauckas, C. & Nie, Q. Adaptive methods for stochasticdifferential equations via natural embeddings and rejectionsampling with memory. Discrete & Continuous DynamicalSystems - B 22, 2731–2761 (2017).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

P.P. and R.P.P. thank Stuart A. Trugman and RobertoMerlin for many insightful discussions. We gratefully ac-knowledge the support of the U.S. Department of En-ergy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory LDRDProgram under project #20190026DR. S.R.S acknowl-edges support from a UTEP start-up grant. AP and FLBacknowledge funding from NSERC of Canada. Crystalgrowth and characterization at Oak Ridge National Lab-oratory was supported by the US Department of Energy,Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sci-

7

ences and Engineering Division. M.C.L. also acknowl-edges support from the US Department of Energy, Officeof Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences andEngineering Division. The Monte Carlo and dynamicalsimulations were performed on the Cedar cluster, hostedby WestGrid and Compute Canada. This work was per-formed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotech-nologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated forthe U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science,under user proposals #2018BU0010 and #2018BU0083.Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative actionequal opportunity employer, is managed by Triad Na-tional Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’sNNSA, under contract 89233218CNA000001.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

S. R. S., P.P, and R.P.P. conceived, initiated, and de-signed the experiment. P.P. built the experimental setup

and carried out the measurements, assisted by K.W.C.Kand S.G. P.P. and K.W.C.K. analyzed and interpretedthe data with input from R.P.P., M.C.L. and D.A.Y. andtheoretical support from J.-X.Z., R.T., A.P., and F.L.B.Crystals were grown by M.A.M. and initial characteriza-tion was performed by S.R.S. and M.A.M. J.-X.Z. andR.T. carried out DFT calculations. F.L.B. and A.P. con-ducted the Monte Carlo and dynamical simulations. P.P.,R.P.P, F.L.B, and A.P. wrote the manuscript with inputfrom all co-authors.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing interests.