9
Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) Numerical Rating Verbal Rating Description 9 Very Good/ Excellent No or negligible rhythmic corrugations. 8 Good Corrugations generally less than 1" deep; Less than 10% of the roadway has significant corrugations; Minor influence on ride quality; Very little loss of vehicle control; Little impact on safety. 7 6 Fair Corrugations generally 1" to 2" deep; 10% to 25% of the roadway has corrugations; Ride quality significantly reduced; Some areas where safety is significantly compromised as vehicle control is lost; Major safety issue as drivers are tempted to drive faster, skimming over the top of the corrugations. 5 4 Poor Corrugations generally 2" to 3" deep; Corrugations over 25% or more of the roadway; Severe decline in ride quality; Major safety issue as drivers are tempted to drive faster, skimming over the top of the corrugations. 3 2 Very Poor Similar to Poor, but deeper and more extensive corrugations. 1 Failed Similar to Very Poor, but deeper and more extensive corrugations. 1 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4 3 Poor

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations)

Numerical Rating

Verbal Rating Description

9 Very Good/

Excellent No or negligible rhythmic corrugations.

8 Good

Corrugations generally less than 1" deep; Less than 10% of the roadway has significant corrugations; Minor influence on ride quality; Very little loss of vehicle control; Little impact on safety. 7

6

Fair

Corrugations generally 1" to 2" deep; 10% to 25% of the roadway has corrugations; Ride quality significantly reduced; Some areas where safety is significantly compromised as vehicle control is lost; Major safety issue as drivers are tempted to drive faster, skimming over the top of the corrugations.

5

4

Poor

Corrugations generally 2" to 3" deep; Corrugations over 25% or more of the roadway; Severe decline in ride quality; Major safety issue as drivers are tempted to drive faster, skimming over the top of the corrugations. 3

2 Very Poor Similar to Poor, but deeper and more extensive corrugations.

1 Failed Similar to Very Poor, but deeper and more extensive corrugations.

1 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4

3 Poor

Page 2: Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

4 Poor

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations)

2 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4

4 Poor

Page 3: Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations)

3 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4

5 Fair

5 Fair

Page 4: Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations)

6 Fair

4 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4

5 Fair

Page 5: Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations)

6 Fair

5 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4

6 Fair

Page 6: Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations)

6 Fair

6 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4

6 Fair

Page 7: Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations)

7 Good

7 Good

7 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4

Page 8: Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations)

7 Good

8 Good

8 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4

Page 9: Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations) - uwyo.edu

Washboards (Rhythmic Corrugations)

8 Good

8 Good

9 2/12/2014 WTTC GH GRRS v 1.4