2
When Culture Threatens the Conservation of Biological Diversity: The Tragic Case of the Zanzibar Leopard ( Panthera pardus adersi ) Helle V. Goldman, Norwegian Polar Institute, [email protected] & Martin T. Walsh, University of Cambridge, [email protected] Presented at the conference on Sustaining Cultural and Biological Diversity in a Rapidly Changing World, American Museum of Natural History, New York, 2-5 April 2008 Further reading Goldman H.V. & Walsh M.T. 1997.  A Leopard in Jeopardy: An Anthropological Survey of Perceptions and Practices Threatening the  Survival of the Zanzibar Leopard (Panthera pardus adersi).  Zanzibar Forestry Technical Paper 63.Zanzibar: Commission for Natural Resources. Goldman H.V. & Walsh M.T. 2002. Is the Zanzibar Leopard (  Panthera pardus adersi ) Extinct? Journal of East African Natural  History 91 , 15–25. Walsh M.T. & Goldman H.V. 2003. The Zanzibar Leopard between Science and Cryptozoology.  Nature East Africa 33, 14–16. Walsh M.T. & Goldman H.V. 2007. Killing the King: The Demonization and Extermination of the Zanzibar Leopard. In E. Dounias et al. (eds.):  Le symbolisme des animaux: L’animal clef-de-voûte de la relation entre l’homme et la nature? Pp. 1133–1182. Paris: Éditions de l’IRD.  km 0 10 Kiwengwa/ Pangeni/ Mchangani Ndudu Uroa Bungi- kerenge Ubago Ufufuma Forest/ Jendele/ Hanyegwa- mchana Cheju Charawe Chwaka Ukongoroni Mtule Jambiani Muyuni/ Kizimkazi/ Makunduchi Muungoni Kitogani Pete Jozani  Leopards reported killed in official records, 1990-1995 Plantations, permanent cultivation Thicket, shifting cultivation Jozani-Chwaka Bay National Park 1 2 4 5 6 3 Zanzibar Town Chaani/ Mkwajuni T   a  n  z  a  n  i   a  ZANZIBAR 4. Conservation plans and their cancellation In 1995 stories of the Zanzibar leopard’s continued survival were conveyed to the IUCN Cat Specialist Group and the following year the Jozani-Chwaka Bay Conservation Project asked us to undertake our study as a precursor to a possible leopard conservation pro- gram. Local accounts of leopard keeping were so com- pelling that a number of wildli fe researchers had ac- cepted them at face value. We found no evidence for leopard domestication, though there were grounds for believing that a small wild population was still extant. However, in a follow-up survey, wildlife consultants could not prove the continuing presence of leopards and advised that it was too late to save this endemic felid. International interest in the conservation of the Zanzibar leopard zzled out abruptly and plans for a targeted conservation program were cancelled. 5. Cultural diversity vs. biodiversity? Most rural Zanzibaris believe there are still leopards on the island, many of them kept by witches. Not sur- prisingly, they also enthusiastically support the pros- pect of the leopard’s nal elimination. In contrast, international conservationists would be delighted by evidence of a viable population of Zanzibar leopards, but the consensus among them is that there are very few or none left. This case raises uncomforta ble ques- tions about the effectiveness of orthodox conservation initiatives when human–wildlife conict i s compound- ed by conicting scientic and indigenous knowledge about endangered species. It underlines the importance of bringing both natural scientic and social scientic approaches to bear on difcult cases in which the con- servation of biological diversity and respect for cultur- al beliefs and diversity clash with one another. 1. The case of the Zanzibar leopard Local culture and i ndigenou s knowledge can threat- en as well as promote the conservation of biologi- cal diversity. This is especially so in undeveloped ru- ral communities when people believe that their lives and livelihoods are threatened by large and danger- ous predators, notwithstanding the value of such ani- mals to conservationists as “agship species”. Here we present just such a case. In 1996 we began a study of indigenous knowledge and local practices relating to the Zanzibar leop- ard (  Panthera pardus adersi ). This is (or was) a little- known subspecies endemic to Unguja, the main island of the Zanzibar archipelago in Tanzania. The Zanzi- bar leopard is thought to have been evolving in isola- tion from its continental African relatives since at least the end of the last ice age, when Unguja was cut off from the East African mainland by rising sea levels. 2. Leopards and witches Rapid human population growth in Zanzibar and the expansion of farming in the mid-20th century de- stroyed leopard habitat and decimated their natural prey , bringing leopards increasingly into conict with people. Several of our informants had, as chi ldren, survived leopard attacks or knew of others who had lost their lives to leopards. Villagers explained the growing number of attacks on people and l ivestock by theorizing that some leopards were magically con- trolled by witches and sent by them to do harm, an idea with parallels in many African cultures. In Zan- zibar close contact or even the mere sight of such a leopard was believed to cause grave il lness. Reputed leopard-k eepers were, li ke other witches, feared and respected. These beliefs still dominate local knowledge about the Zanzibar leopard. Endangered knowledge Like the animal itself, ethnobiological and linguistic knowledge of the Zanzibar leopard is also en- dangered. Only former hunters can now describe the leopard and its behavior in any detail. Very few people know any of the specializ ed vocabulary relating to leopards. In 1996 we recorded more than 20 Swahili names for the Zanzibar leopard, including euphemisms used to conceal ref- erence to this much-feared animal and dialect terms for the different types of leopard that experi- enced hunters recognized. One of the most widely used terms is kisutu , though most Zanzibaris only know this as the name for a kind of women’skanga or colored cotton cloth, worn ceremonial- ly by brides and also sometimes used to signal menstruation. The kisutu wrap has a central motif of owers and crosses that parallels the coat pattern of the leopard with its distinctive rosette s. 3. Exterminating the leopard In the post-war period villagers in di fferent parts of the island made determined attempts to exterminate leopards and/or punish the witches believed to own them. After the Zanzibar Revolution in 1964, an is- land-wide leopard-eradicatio n and witch-nding cam- paign was organized with government and widespread popular support. No one knows exactly how many leopards were trapped and shot during this campaign, but according to hunters who took part in it the impact was devastating. Zanzibar’s leopard population never recovered from the mass killing. State-subsidized leopard hunting continued into the 1990s as part of national efforts to control wildlife classied as “vermin” . Although some i nternation al authorities presumed the Zanzibar leopard extinct by the early 1970s, ofcial statistics record that leopards were being kil led by hunters through 1995. Leopard sightings and incidents of livestock predation are still being alleged and reported to this day . Thanksto Judith Chupaskoand MarkOmuraatthe HarvardMuseum ofComparative Zoology,Cam- bridge,MA.

When Culture Threatens the Conservation of Biological Diversity: The Tragic Case of the Zanzibar Leopard (Panthera pardus adersi)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/14/2019 When Culture Threatens the Conservation of Biological Diversity: The Tragic Case of the Zanzibar Leopard (Panthera pardus adersi)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/when-culture-threatens-the-conservation-of-biological-diversity-the-tragic 1/1

When Culture Threatens the Conservation of Biological Diversity:

The Tragic Case of the Zanzibar Leopard (Panthera pardus adersi )Helle V. Goldman, Norwegian Polar Institute, [email protected] & Martin T. Walsh, University of Cambridge, [email protected] 

Presented at the conference on Sustaining Cultural and Biological Diversity in a Rapidly Changing World,American Museum of Natural History, New York, 2-5 April 2008

Further reading

Goldman H.V. & Walsh M.T. 1997. A Leopard in Jeopardy: An Anthropological Survey of Perceptions and Practices Threatening the

 Survival of the Zanzibar Leopard (Panthera pardus adersi). Zanzibar Forestry Technical Paper 63. Zanzibar: Commission forNatural Resources.

Goldman H.V. & Walsh M.T. 2002. Is the Zanzibar Leopard ( Panthera pardus adersi ) Extinct? Journal of East African Natural 

 History 91, 15–25.Walsh M.T. & Goldman H.V. 2003. The Zanzibar Leopard between Science and Cryptozoology.  Nature East Africa 33 , 14–16.Walsh M.T. & Goldman H.V. 2007. Killing the King: The Demonization and Extermination of the Zanzibar Leopard. In E. Dounias et al.

(eds.): Le symbolisme des animaux: L’animal clef-de-voûte de la relation entre l’homme et la nature? Pp. 1133–1182. Paris: Éditions de l’IRD. 

km

0 10

Kiwengwa/Pangeni/Mchangani

Ndudu

Uroa

Bungi-kerenge

Ubago

Ufufuma Forest/Jendele/Hanyegwa-mchana

Cheju Charawe

Chwaka

Ukongoroni

Mtule

Jambiani

Muyuni/Kizimkazi/Makunduchi

Muungoni

Kitogani

PeteJozani

 

Leopards reported

killed in officialrecords, 1990-1995

Plantations,permanent cultivation

Thicket,shifting cultivation

Jozani-Chwaka BayNational Park

1 2 4 5 63

Zanzibar Town

Chaani/Mkwajuni

T   a  n  z  a  n  

i   a  ZANZIBAR

4. Conservation plans and their cancellation

In 1995 stories of the Zanzibar leopard’s continuedsurvival were conveyed to the IUCN Cat SpecialistGroup and the following year the Jozani-Chwaka BayConservation Project asked us to undertake our studyas a precursor to a possible leopard conservation pro-gram. Local accounts of leopard keeping were so com-pelling that a number of wildli fe researchers had ac-cepted them at face value. We found no evidence forleopard domestication, though there were grounds forbelieving that a small wild population was still extant.However, in a follow-up survey, wildlife consultantscould not prove the continuing presence of leopardsand advised that it was too late to save this endemicfelid. International interest in the conservation of theZanzibar leopard fizzled out abruptly and plans for atargeted conservation program were cancelled.

5. Cultural diversity vs. biodiversity?

Most rural Zanzibaris believe there are still leopardson the island, many of them kept by witches. Not sur-prisingly, they also enthusiastically support the pros-pect of the leopard’s final elimination. In contrast,international conservationists would be delighted byevidence of a viable population of Zanzibar leopards,but the consensus among them is that there are veryfew or none left. This case raises uncomfortable ques-tions about the effectiveness of orthodox conservationinitiatives when human–wildlife conflict i s compound-ed by conflicting scientific and indigenous knowledgeabout endangered species. It underlines the importanceof bringing both natural scientific and social scientificapproaches to bear on difficult cases in which the con-servation of biological diversity and respect for cultur-al beliefs and diversity clash with one another.

1. The case of the Zanzibar leopard

Local culture and i ndigenous knowledge can threat-en as well as promote the conservation of biologi-cal diversity. This is especially so in undeveloped ru-ral communities when people believe that their livesand livelihoods are threatened by large and danger-ous predators, notwithstanding the value of such ani-mals to conservationists as “flagship species”. Here wepresent just such a case.

In 1996 we began a study of indigenous knowledgeand local practices relating to the Zanzibar leop-ard ( Panthera pardus adersi ). This is (or was) a little-known subspecies endemic to Unguja, the main islandof the Zanzibar archipelago in Tanzania. The Zanzi-bar leopard is thought to have been evolving in isola-tion from its continental African relatives since at leastthe end of the last ice age, when Unguja was cut off from the East African mainland by rising sea levels.

2. Leopards and witches

Rapid human population growth in Zanzibar andthe expansion of farming in the mid-20th century de-stroyed leopard habitat and decimated their naturalprey, bringing leopards increasingly into conflict withpeople. Several of our informants had, as chi ldren,survived leopard attacks or knew of others who hadlost their lives to leopards. Villagers explained thegrowing number of attacks on people and l ivestock by theorizing that some leopards were magically con-trolled by witches and sent by them to do harm, anidea with parallels in many African cultures. In Zan-zibar close contact or even the mere sight of such aleopard was believed to cause grave il lness. Reputedleopard-keepers were, li ke other witches, feared andrespected. These beliefs still dominate local knowledgeabout the Zanzibar leopard.

Endangered knowledge

Like the animal itself, ethnobiological and linguistic knowledge of the Zanzibar leopard is also en-

dangered. Only former hunters can now describe the leopard and its behavior in any detail. Veryfew people know any of the specialized vocabulary relating to leopards. In 1996 we recordedmore than 20 Swahili names for the Zanzibar leopard, including euphemisms used to conceal ref-erence to this much-feared animal and dialect terms for the different types of leopard that experi-

enced hunters recognized. One of the most widely used terms is kisutu , though most Zanzibarisonly know this as the name for a kind of women’s kanga or colored cotton cloth, worn ceremonial-ly by brides and also sometimes used to signal menstruation. The kisutu wrap has a central motif 

of flowers and crosses that parallels the coat pattern of the leopard with its distinctive rosettes.

3. Exterminating the leopard

In the post-war period villagers in di fferent parts of the island made determined attempts to exterminateleopards and/or punish the witches believed to ownthem. After the Zanzibar Revolution in 1964, an is-land-wide leopard-eradication and witch-finding cam-paign was organized with government and widespreadpopular support. No one knows exactly how manyleopards were trapped and shot during this campaign,but according to hunters who took part in it the impactwas devastating. Zanzibar’s leopard population neverrecovered from the mass killing.

State-subsidized leopard hunting continued intothe 1990s as part of national efforts to control wildlifeclassified as “vermin”. Although some i nternationalauthorities presumed the Zanzibar leopard extinct bythe early 1970s, official statistics record that leopardswere being kil led by hunters through 1995. Leopardsightings and incidents of livestock predation are stillbeing alleged and reported to this day.

Thanksto JudithChupaskoandMarkOmuraattheHarvardMuseumofComparativeZoology,Cam-bridge,MA.