386 U.S. 15 87 S.Ct. 847 17 L.Ed.2d 696 Landon ZUCKERMAN et al. v. Samuel GREASON. No. 71. Supreme Court of the United States February 13, 1967 Rehearing Denied March 13, 1967. See 386 U.S. 969, 87 S.Ct. 1016. Leonard Feldman, for petitioners. Samuel Greason, pro se. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department. PER CURIAM. 1 The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511, 87 S.Ct. 625. 2 Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN, and Mr. Justice STEWART would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice HARLAN'S dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 520, 87 S.Ct., at 631. 3 Mr. Justice WHITE, dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. State of New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 530, 87 S.Ct., at 636.

Zuckerman v. Greason, 386 U.S. 15 (1967)

Download PDF Report

Upload
scribd-government-docs
View
212
Download
0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Filed: 1967-03-13Precedential Status: PrecedentialCitations: 386 U.S. 15, 87 S. Ct. 847, 17 L. Ed. 2d 696, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2273Docket: 71Supreme Court Database id: 1966-048

Citation preview

386 U.S. 15

87 S.Ct. 847

17 L.Ed.2d 696

Landon ZUCKERMAN et al.v.

Samuel GREASON.

No. 71.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 13, 1967Rehearing Denied March 13, 1967.

See 386 U.S. 969, 87 S.Ct. 1016.

Leonard Feldman, for petitioners.

Samuel Greason, pro se.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Appellate Division of theSupreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department.

PER CURIAM.

1 The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and thecase is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York,Second Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein,385 U.S. 511, 87 S.Ct. 625.

2 Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN, and Mr. Justice STEWART wouldaffirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice HARLAN'Sdissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 520, 87 S.Ct., at 631.

3 Mr. Justice WHITE, dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion inGarrity v. State of New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 530, 87S.Ct., at 636.