2016 UNDERWATER
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
BRIDGE #
DISTRICT: COUNTY: CITY/TOWNSHIP:
Date of Inspection:
Equipment Used:
Inspected By:
Report Written By:
Report Reviewed By:
Final Report Date:
66546
2 AVE SW(MSAS 123) over CANNON RIVER
District 6 Rice Faribault
05/26/2016
Owens, Garrett
Garrett Owens
City or Municipal Highway AgencyOwner:
MinnesotaSTATE:
UNDERWATER SUMMARY 3
UNDERWATER INSPECTION 4
UNDERWATER INSPECTION PROCEDURES 6
STRUCTURE INVENTORY 7
ELEMENTS 8
PICTURES 11
DRAWINGS 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NUMBER
Contractor:
(A) Monitor concrete deterioration at Pier and if the deficiencies continue to progress and the exposed reinforcing steel starts to exhibit section loss, repairs may become warranted at that time.
(B) Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of sixty (60) months.
Collins Engineers, Inc.
9687Contractor Job Number:
RECOMMENDATIONS
REPORT SUMMARY
UNDERWATER INSPECTION
The substructure unit inspected at Bridge No. 66546, Pier 1, was found to be generally in satisfactory to fair condition with no defects of structural significance observed. The concrete was typically soft and easily erodible with up to 5 inches of penetration over 50 percent of the pier face from channel bottom to 1 foot above the waterline. Random locations exhibited exposed coated reinforcing steel with no section loss present. The north and south embankment slopes were lined with an articulated concrete mat and the channel bottom material at the pier consisted of randomly displaced paving stones with sand infill.
(A) The north and south slope embankments were lined with articulated concrete mat from top of slope to 1 foot below waterline and from 10 feet upstream to 10 feet downstream of the bridge fascia.
(B) The concrete face of the north pier wall from the upstream nose to the midpoint and from the downstream quarter to the downstream consists of soft and easily erodible concrete with up to three inches of penetration from channel bottom to 1 foot above the waterline.
(C) The channel bottom consisted of randomly displaced paving stones with sandy infill.
(D) The slope protection mat had missing and displaced blocks.The most severe damage was 7 foot by 3 foot area of missing blocks at the south shore.
(E) The upstream half of the south side of the pier had heavy scaling with up to 5 inches of penetration. Exposed rebar was present.
(F) The downstream quarter of the south face of the pier exhibited heavy spalling with up to 4.5 inches of penetration. Exposed rebar was present, no section loss was present
INSPECTION FINDINGS
Page 3 of 16
The bottom of architectural cap at downstream nose of Pier 1.Water Level Reference:
WATERLINE DATUM
Waterline Elevation (feet):
The waterline was approximately 7.4 feet below reference.Description:
955.5
4.
Pier 1Substructure(s) Inspected:
SUBSTRUCTURE INSPECTION DATA
General Shape:
3.4 Maximum Water Depth at Substructure(s) Inspected (feet):
The pier consists of an oblong reinforced concrete pier wall with rounded noses. The pier wall encases 18 steel H-Piles which extend into the pier wall from the bottom of the pier wall up 7 feet.
Code:Item 62: Culvert:
5
Y 48 05/2016 Code:Item 92B: Underwater Inspection:
Code:
(Minnesota specific codes are used for 92B and 113)
NBIS CODING INFORMATION5.
Item 60: Substructure:
Item 61: Channel and Channel Protection:
6Code:
District 6District:
2 AVE SW(MSAS 123)
County:
The superstructure consists of a two span haunched slab bridge supporting a reinforced concrete deck. The bridge is supported by two reinforced concrete abutments and one reinforced concrete pier wall with steel H-Piles extending from the bottom of the wall up 7 feet.
Bridge Description:
066 - Rice
Facility Carried:
BRIDGE DATA1.
UNDERWATER INSPECTION
Bridge #:
CANNON RIVERFeature Intersected:
66546
Underwater Visibility (feet):
Sunny, 80° FWeather Conditions:
1.0
3.
NegligibleWaterway Velocity (ft/sec):
05/26/2016
Professional Engineer/Team Leader:
INSPECTION DATA2.
Cory R. Stuber, P.E.
Date of Underwater Inspection:
Garrett R. Owens, P.E.Inspection Diver:
Page 4 of 16
Scour 1885 EA 1
892 Slopes and Slope Protection 1 1EA
61
STRUCTURAL ELEMENT CONDITION RATING
Conditions
6.
L
Bridge is scour critical because abutment or pier foundation is rated as unstable due to observed scour at bridge site.
Item 113: Scour Critical Bridge: Code:
No (Mark your selection with an X)Yes X
210
CS3 CS4
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall 2081 LF
CS2ELEM # Unit CS1Element Description Quantity
Page 5 of 16
The routine underwater inspection of Bridge 66546 (MSAS 123 over the Cannon River) was completed on May 26, 2016. The underwater inspection was conducted from shore. The inspection was conducted by a team consisting of a PE-Diver with a valid MnDOT Team Leader certification, a backup diver and a dive tender. Due to waterway conditions at the time of inspection, the inspection could be accomplished by wading in accordance with OSHA regulations. Profiles were taken along the upstream and downstream faces of the bridge and around the periphery of substructure units to determine the presence, location and area of scour.
The bridge elements inspected consisted of Pier 1. According to the bridge inventory or design drawings, Pier 1were founded on 18 steel H-Piles. Inspection procedures followed FHWA guidance and the MnDOT Bridge and Structure Inspection Program Manual with channel bottom probing to search for foundations. The routine underwater inspection frequency is recommended to remain at a maximum of 60 months based on those findings and risk factors. Also, inspection procedures should continue to follow the above approach and standard guidance with 100% Level I and 10% Level II intensity efforts.
INSPECTION PROCEDURES
UNDERWATER INSPECTION
Page 6 of 16
N - Not Applicable Spec. Feat.Pier Foundation (Material/Type)
1 - CONCCantilever ID
+ W A T E R W A Y +Number of Spans Historic Status
3 - FTG PILE
Underwater Y 60Culvert Type 3 - FTG PILE
Pinned Asbly. N
05/26/2016
Barrel Length
89.2 ft. Navigation Control
Waterway Opening (sf.) 778Structure Length
ft. Year Painted
0 - No nav. control on waterwayDeck Width (Out-to-Out) 84.3
+ P A I N T +
APPR: 0 TOTAL:5 - Not eligible
MAIN: 2
Main Span Length 39.0 ft.Drainage Area (sq. mi.) 314.0
B R I D G E D A T A +Main Span Detail
N - NOT REQUIRED+ M I S C.
Appr. Span Type Structure Flared
GR Termini N - NOT REQUIRED
Appr. Guardrail
Main Span Type 2 - Concrete Continuous Median Width On Bridge
ft. Bridge Railing 1 - MEETS STANDARDS
N - NOT REQUIRED
Main Span Design 09 - Slab Span
ft. GR Transition
Skew 0
Y/N Freq Date
NAbutment Foundation (Material/Type)
1 - CONC Frac. Critical
N - No Splice
D E P T H I N S P. +Appr. Span Design
0 - No flare+ I N
Appr. Span Detail Field Conn. ID
Parallel Structure N - No parallel structure
Pier Protection
0 - Not Required
Rating Date 11/27/20135707 sq. ft. Traffic
ft. 50B. Rt 10.00Sidewalk Width 50A. Lt 8.00
Roadway Area (Curb-to-Curb)
Posted Load 0 - Not Required
PostingStructure Area (Out-to-Out) 7520 sq. ft.
DBL:VEH: SEMI:
Rt 28 ARail Type Lt 28 C N - N/AN - N/A B N - N/A
N - Not Applicable Overweight Permit CodesCurb Height Lt
ft. Horizontal 0 - Not Required
0.67 ft. Vertical0.67 ft. Rt
Wear Surf Install Year 2008
sq. ft. Nav. Vert. Lift Bridge Clear. (ft.)
L - STBL - LOW RISK
Year 2008Primer Type MN Scour Code
Painted Area
Unsound Paint % Nav. Clr. (ft.)Deck Material 1 - Concrete Cast-in-Place 0.0Wear Surf Type 4 - Low Slump Concrete
Vert. 0.0 Horiz.
S I G N S +Operating Rating 2 - HS TRUCK
1 - Epoxy Coated Reinforcing + B R I D G E
Inventory Rating 2 - HS TRUCK 25.0
49.0Deck Rebars Install Year 2008
Deck Rebars
Finish TypeWear Course/Fill Depth 0.17 ft.
0 - None
Design Load 9 - HS 25 (OR GREATER)
+ C A P A C I T Y R A T I N G S +Deck Membrane
44 ° 18
Inspector Name Owens, Garrett
Latitude Control Section (TH Only) Status' 29.06 ''
2 - 2-way traffic
Routine Inspection Frequency 24
Sect., Twp., Range
0.3 MI S OF JCT TH 3 Level of Service 1 - MAINLINE
- 20W Roadway Type30 - 110N
Detour Length 1.0 mi.R A T I N G S +
Custodian 04 - City or Municipal Highway Agency
Owner 04 - City or Municipal Highway Agency
Deck 7 Unsound Deck %
C O N D I T I O N° 16 '
A - Open
Longitude 93 000+00.838 + N B I 18.91 '' Reference Point
Crew
+ I N S P E C T I O N +
Agency Br. No. 211
District 06
Bridge Match ID (TIS) 0 Userkey
2 AVE SW(MSAS 123) over CANNON RIVER
Minnesota Structure Inventory Report
Bridge ID: 66546
+ G E N E R A L + + R O A D W A Y +
Date: 08/31/2016
Sufficiency Rating 97.1Roadway Name or Description
123
City Faribault
Routine Inspection Date 05/16/2016
Desc. Loc.
Township 2 AVE NW (MSAS 123)
Number
NRoadway O/U Key Route On StructureMaint. Area Structurally Deficient
NRoute Sys 05 - MSASCounty 066 - Rice Functionally Obsolete
Lanes
Waterway Adequacy 9Max. Vert. Clear.
ft.Legislative District 26Bft.Potential ABC 2 - N/A ft.
ft.On - Off System Roadway Width 64.0 ft.
Vertical Clearance ft.1 - ON
Underclearances N
Service On 5 - Highway-pedestrian Appr. Surface Width+ S A F E T Y F E A T U R E S +
5 - Waterway Bridge Roadway Width 64.0
64.0 ft.
Service Under
ft.
64.0 ft. Approach Alignment 8Horizontal Clear.
ft.
ft.+ S T R U C T U R E + Lateral Clearance
HCADT ADTT6
Year Built 2008
MN Year Reconstructed Functional Class
%Channel 5
Substructure
0Superstructure 7
ON 5 UNDER
9578 YEAR 2007BMU Agreement ADT
Structure Evaluation 6If Divided
D I M E N S I O N S +Bridge Plan Location 4 - MUNICIPAL
Deck Geometry 4NB-EB SB-WBDate Opened to Traffic
+ R D W Y
FHWA Year Reconstructed
MN Temporary Status
16 - Urban - Minor ArterialCulvert N
A P P R A I S A L R A T I N G S +N - Not Applicable + N B I
Page 7 of 16
County:
City:
Township:
Township:Section: Range:
Span Type:
NBI Deck: Super: Sub: Chan: Culv:
Appraisal Ratings - Approach: Waterway:
Required Bridge Signs - Load Posting:
Horizntal:
Traffic:
Vertical:
MN Scour Code:
Open, Posted, Closed:
Location:
Route:
Control Section:
Local Agency Bridge Nbr.:
Ref. Pt.:
Maint. Area:
Length:
Deck Width:
Rdwy. Area/ Pct. Unsnd:
Paint Area/ Pct. Unsnd:
Culvert:
Rice
Faribault
110N30 20W
2 - Concrete Continuous 1 - Slab
7 7 6 5 N
8 9
0 - Not Required
0 - Not Required
0 - Not Required
N - Not Applicable
L - STBL - LOW RISK
0.3 MI S OF JCT TH 3
05 - MSAS 123 000+00.838
89.2
84.3
5707 sq. ft. / %
sq. ft. / %
N/A
A - Open
ft.
ft.
Postings:List:
MINNESOTA BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
09/09/2016
Inspector: CO Bridge
BRIDGE 66546 2 AVE SW(MSAS 123) OVER CANNON RIVER
Unofficial Structurally Deficient N
NUnofficial Functionally Obsolete
Unofficial Sufficiency Rating 97.1
ELEMNBR ELEMENT NAME INSP. DATE QUANTITY
QTYCS 1
QTYCS 2
QTYCS 3
QTYCS 4REPORT TYPE
Reinforced Concrete Slab 05/26/2016 7520 SF 7495 25 0 038 Underwater
05/16/2016 7520 SF 7495 25 0 0Routine
Notes: There are three longitudinal cracks in the underside of the deck that extend out from the abutments.[2014] - some crack have efflorescence.[2016] - 25sf of minor cracking with efflorescence
510 - Wearing Surfaces 5707 SF 5673 34 0 0
Notes: Concrete Slab with Cathodic Protection System Notes: There are no spalls, delamination's, or patches noted in the surface of the deck.[2014] - no change[2016] - 300lf of moderate sized cracks. minor spalls at top of end block along poured deck joint.
Underwater 05/26/2016
5707 SF 5673 34 0 0Routine 05/16/2016
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall 05/26/2016 81 LF 0 20 61 0210 Underwater
05/16/2016 81 LF 76 5 0 0Routine
Notes: No concrete deterioration noted.[2014] - no change[2016] - 5 leaching vertical cracks.[2016] -Underwater Inspection - The concrete face of the north pier wall from the upstream nose to the midpoint and from the downstreamquarter to the downstream consists of soft and easily erodible concrete with up to three inches of penetration from channel bottom to 1 footabove the waterline. The upstream half of the south side of the Pier had heavy scaling with up to 5 inches of penetration. Exposed rebar waspresent.
Reinforced Concrete Abutment 05/26/2016 208 LF 208 0 0 0215 Underwater
05/16/2016 208 LF 208 0 0 0Routine
Notes: South Abutment - There are 2 hairline vertical cracks in the front face of the abutment. The cracks are located between bearings 6 and7 and under bearing 4.[2014] - loose sand and fill covering the abutment. [2016] - no changeNorth Abutment - There are 3 hairline vertical cracks in the front face of the abutment. The cracks are located between bearings 5 and 6 and 6and 7 and along the east side of bearing 3.[2014, 2016] - no change
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap 05/26/2016 80 LF 80 0 0 0234 Underwater
05/16/2016 80 LF 80 0 0 0Routine
Notes: No concrete deterioration noted.[2014, 2016] - no change
Strip Seal Expansion Joint 05/26/2016 166 LF 166 0 0 0300 Underwater
05/16/2016 166 LF 166 0 0 0Routine
Notes: South End - OK, the strip seals were full of dirt and debris; however there were no signs of leakage at the bridge seat.[2012] - the east end of the abutment is wet at this time. [2014] - Both E and W faces have water leaking down them. [2016] - no changeNorth End - OK, the strip seals were full of dirt and debris; however there were no signs of leakage at the bridge seat. [2014] - West side coverplate is missing all bolts. Also water leaking down abut. face @ E and W corners. [2016] - no change
Page 8 of 16
Pourable Joint Seal 05/26/2016 170 LF 60 0 100 10301 Underwater
05/16/2016 170 LF 60 0 100 10Routine
Notes: The pourable joints are located in the approach panels.There are large areas along both approach slabs where the joint material has lost adhesion approximately 95 linear feet.[2012] - approximately 105 LF has lost adhesion. [2014] - no change[2016] - 110lf of lost adhesion and/or missing joint material. 10lf of spalled adjacent concrete.
Reinforced Concrete Approach Slab 05/26/2016 2560 SF 2520 40 0 0321 Underwater
05/16/2016 2560 SF 2520 40 0 0Routine
Notes: South Approach - There are small cracked and delaminated area located along the end block in both lanes. There is a 3" X 36" crackedand delaminated area along the right hand lane in the south bound lane and a 3" X 12" cracked and delaminated area along the right hand laneof the north bound lane. There are 4 full length unsealed longitudinal cracks in the approach.
North Approach - There is a small 6" X 12" cracked and delaminated area located at the west end of the end block next to the curb. There are 6full length unsealed longitudinal cracks in the approach.2012 - there are now 12 full length unsealed longitudinal cracks in the approach.[2014, 2016] - no change
Metal Bridge Railing 05/26/2016 210 LF 174 36 0 0330 Underwater
05/16/2016 210 LF 174 36 0 0Routine
Notes: The railing consists of 30" high solid concrete base with a 26" high painted steel rail attached to the top of the concrete rail.[2016] - no structural defects on metal rail. anchorages are secure.
515 - Steel Protective Coating 420 SF 415 5 0 0
Notes: [2016] - a few minor paint scratches
Underwater 05/26/2016
420 SF 415 5 0 0Routine 05/16/2016
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Railing 05/26/2016 220 LF 208 12 0 0331 Underwater
05/16/2016 220 LF 208 12 0 0Routine
Notes: The railing consists of 30" high solid concrete base with a 26" high painted steel rail attached to the top of the concrete rail.
West Railing - the concrete portion has 5 railing section with 1 to 4 vertical cracks per section with some staining or leaching.[2016] - no change
East Railing - the concrete portion has 3 railing section with 1 to 2 vertical cracks per section with some staining or leaching.[2012] - there are 4 railing sections with cracking.[2014] - no change
Critical Deficiencies or Safety Hazards 05/26/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0800 Underwater
05/16/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0Routine
Notes: [2014, 2016] - No critical finding were noted at the time of this inspection.
Concrete Decks - Cracking & Sealing 05/26/2016 1050 LF 750 300 0 0810 Underwater
05/16/2016 1050 LF 750 300 0 0Routine
Notes: There is an unsealed transverse crack over the pier and two full length unsealed cold joint cracks.[2016] - 1050lf of cracking. approx. 300lf unsealed.
Scour 05/26/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0885 Underwater
Slopes & Slope Protection 05/26/2016 1 EA 0 1 0 0892 Underwater
05/16/2016 1 EA 0 1 0 0Routine
Notes: The slopes are in stable condition.South Slope - vandals have remodeled one of the 3' X 10' concrete slope protection blocks located near the center line.[2014] - There are scattered area of blocks that have heaved or have been patched.[2016] - no change
ELEMNBR ELEMENT NAME INSP. DATE QUANTITY
QTYCS 1
QTYCS 2
QTYCS 3
QTYCS 4
BRIDGE 66546 2 AVE SW(MSAS 123) OVER CANNON RIVER
REPORT TYPE
Page 9 of 16
Deck & Approach Drainage 05/26/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0894 Underwater
05/16/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0Routine
Notes: [2016] - no drainage issues noted
Sidewalk, Curb, & Median 05/26/2016 1 EA 0 0 1 0895 Underwater
05/16/2016 1 EA 0 0 1 0Routine
Notes: There is 60' of unsealed cracks in the sidewalk. All of the curb sections are intact.[2012] - there is 150' of unsealed cracks in the sidewalk. [2014] - There is a 2'x16" area of cracked and delam concrete at the expansion plateSE end. West sidewalk N end expansion plate has shifted and all bolts are missing. [2016] - no change
Miscellaneous Items 05/26/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0899 Underwater
05/16/2016 1 EA 1 0 0 0Routine
Notes: There are some areas of graffiti painted along the north abutment and the north slope.There are 4 light poles on the bridge that are in good condition.There is a concrete walkway and steel railing in front of the north abutment. The walkway and railing are in good condition.
Protected Species 05/26/2016 1 EA 0 1 0 0900 Underwater
05/16/2016 1 EA 0 1 0 0Routine
Notes: [2016] - swallow nests are present.
General Notes:
Inspector's Signature Reviewer's Signature
Garrett Owens
Inventory Notes:
Bridge 66546
NOTE: Bridge was built in 2008 it replaced Bridge 3578.[2010] - inspected by Brian Haugen.After the flooding of September 2010, BR#66546 was inspected for evidence of scour, flood related damage and/or timberdebris accumulation. No significant flood related issues were found.[2012] - inspected by Gary Waletzki and Aaron Forthun[2014] - inspected by Gary Waletzki and Aaron Forthun.[2016] - inspected by Robert Pyfferoen
Channel - NBI 8 The banks are in stable condition.
58. Deck NBI:
36A. Brdg Railings NBI:
36B. Transitions NBI:
36C. Appr Guardrail NBI:
36D. Appr GuardrailTerminal NBI:
59. Superstructure NBI:
60. Substructure NBI:
61. Channel NBI:
62. Culvert NBI:
71. Waterway Adeq NBI:
72. Appr RoadwayAlignment NBI:
2014 Minor deterioration.
2014 Isolated deterioration.
2014 Isolated deterioration.
2014 Well vegetated.
2014 Chance of over topping is remote
2014 No speed reduction required.
ELEMNBR ELEMENT NAME INSP. DATE QUANTITY
QTYCS 1
QTYCS 2
QTYCS 3
QTYCS 4
BRIDGE 66546 2 AVE SW(MSAS 123) OVER CANNON RIVER
REPORT TYPE
Page 10 of 16
Photo 1 - East Elevation, Looking West
Photo 2 - West Elevation, Looking East
Pictures
Page 11 of 16
Pictures
Photo 3 - Typical View of Pier and South Shore, Looking North
Photo 4 - Typical View of Pier, Looking South
Page 12 of 16
Pictures
Photo 5 - Typical View of South Shoreline, Looking South
Photo 6 - View of Heavy Damage to South Slope Mat, Looking West
Page 13 of 16
Pictures
Photo 7 - Exposed Rebar on the South Face, Looking North
Photo 8 - Typical Spall and Scaling on Pier, Looking South
Page 14 of 16
Figure No.: 1
Legend
N
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MINNESOTA
INSPECTION AND SOUNDING PLAN
Flo
w
1
Inspection Note Number
Refer to Figure 2 for Inspection Notes.
Note:
(Typ.)
Shoreline
TYPICAL END VIEW OF TOWERS
SOUNDING PLAN
42'-0"42'-0"
SOUTH ABUTMENT NORTH ABUTMENT
PIER
84'-
4"
Project: 63-9687
-1.2-1.9 -0.4
-2.7-2.5
-2.1 -3.2
-0.8-3.0
-2.2-2.3
-2.4
1
1
Drawn By: BGDO Date: JUNE 2016
Checked By: BRL
-18.0 Sounding Depth from Waterline (9/13/12)
River
CA
NN
ON
3
12x74 Steel H-Pile
CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY
OVER THE CANNON RIVER
STRUCTURE NO. 66546
Scale: N.T.S.
-2.3 -2.4 -0.9
-2.5-3.0
-3.4-2.7
-1.3 -3.1
-1.0-2.0 -2.7
Sounding Depth from Waterline (5/26/16)-18.0
measured in feet. Soundings indicate the water depth at the time of inspection and are3
waterline elevation of 955.5 feet.pier cap at downstream nose of the pier. This corresponds with a was located approximately 7.4 feet below bottom of architectural At the time of inspection on May 26, 2016 the waterline 2.
The concrete pier was inspected during the underwater inspection.1.
General Notes:
www.collinsengr.com
(651) 646-8502
St. Paul, MN, 55104
Suite 206
1599 Selby Avenue
6
5
2
4
4
2
Pedestria
n Trail
Exposed rebar was present, no section loss was present.exhibited heavy spalling with up to 4.5 inches of penetration.The downstream quarter of the south face of the pier6
rebar was present.heavy scaling with up to 5 inches of penetration. Exposed The upstream half of the south side of the pier had5
missing blocks at the south shore.The most severe damage was 7 foot by 3 foot area of The slope protection mat had missing and displaced blocks.4
stones with sandy infill. The channel bottom consisted of randomly displaced paving3
bottom to 1 foot above the waterline. concrete with up to 3 inches of penetration from channelface of the pier wall exhibited soft and easily erodableThe upstream half and downstream quarter of the north2
to 10 feet downstream of the bridge fascia. 1 foot below waterline and from 10 feet upstreamarticulated concrete mat from top of slope toThe north and south slope embankments were lined with1
Inspection Notes:
Page 15 of 16
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MINNESOTA
UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAMFASCIA PROFILES
Refer to Figure 1 for General Notes.
Note:
Figure No.: 2
940
960
980
940
960
980
UPSTREAM FASCIA PROFILE
42'-0"42'-0"
ShorelineShoreline
940
960
980
940
960
980
42'-0"42'-0"
ShorelineShoreline
DOWNSTREAM FASCIA PROFILE
Project: 63-9687
W.L. El. 955.5
W.L. El. 955.5
on 9/13/12
Channel Bottom
on 9/13/12
Channel Bottom
Drawn By: BGDO Date: JUNE 2016
Checked By: BRL
EL. 950.5
B/Pier Wall
EL. 950.5
B/Pier Wall
CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY
OVER THE CANNON RIVER
STRUCTURE NO. 66546
Scale: 1"=20'
on 5/26/16
Channel Bottom
on 9/13/12
Channel Bottom
www.collinsengr.com
(651) 646-8502
St. Paul, MN, 55104
Suite 206
1599 Selby Avenue
PIER N. AbutmentS. Abutment
S. Abutment N. AbutmentPIER
Pedestrian Trail
Pedestrian Trail
Page 16 of 16