Current issues and approaches in developing digital literaciesHelen Beetham, Developing Digital Literacies programme consultant
with representatives of the SEEDPoD project (Plymouth University), Digitally Ready project (University of Reading), DIAL project (University of the Arts, London) and Digital Literacies in Transition project (University of Greenwich)
Developing Digital Literacies Programme
A sector-wide programme promoting the development of coherent, inclusive and holistic institutional strategies and organisational approaches for developing digital literacies for staff and students in UK further and higher education.
Developing Digital Literacies Projects
University of Greenwich University of the Arts London University of Exeter Grŵp Llandrillo Menai University of Plymouth University of Reading
University of Bath University College London Oxford Brookes University Cardiff University Worcester College of Technology Institute of Education, London
What do we mean by 'digital literacies'?
The capabilities, aptitudes and attitudes learners need to thrive in a digital economy and society (JISC)
For example (from various institutional strategies):
[Ensure] students are prepared for study and employment in the digital age, with a range of learning literacies embedded into the curriculum.
Consider the potential of technology to promote knowledge building and reflective, student-centred, creative and collaborative learning.
[develop] self-regulating citizens in a globally connected society, able to handle multiple, diverse information sources and media.
JISC/SCONUL
ICT/Computer Literacy the ability to adopt, adapt and use digital devices, applications and services in pursuit of scholarly and educational goals.
Information Literacy: the ability to find, interpret, evaluate, manage and share information, especially scholarly and educational information
Media Literacy: the ability to critically read and creatively produce academic and professional communications in a range of media.
Communication and Collaboration: the ability to participate in digital networks and working groups of research and learning
Digital scholarship: the ability to participate in emerging academic, professional and research practices that depend on digital systems
Learning Skills: the ability to study and learn effectively in technology-rich environments, formal and informal
Alternative models
Greenwich Five Resources model
How are you involved in digital literacy?
Choose the one most relevant to your responsibilities and interests. Give more details in the chat box.
A) Supporting student learning in the curriculumB) Supporting student learning alongside the curriculum e.g. library, careers, learning skillsC) Developing professional practices of staffD) Building C21st learning environmentE) Developing institutional strategy
access and awareness
functional skills
situated practices
attributes and identities
extensive, complex, ill-defined
intensive, simplified, well-defined
What experiences do learners needto develop DLs?
curr
icu
lum
co-c
urr
icu
lum
no
n-f
orm
al l
earn
ing
Developing institutions to develop people
Features audited at baseline:
institutional infrastructure and learning environment relevant strategies and policies Academic/learning cultures and attitudes roles/responsibilities of professional services practices in the curriculum the learning experience
What is being done?
Professional development for teaching staffPartnerships with professional staff
Mini-projects / case studies in departmentsDevelop DL materials with/for students
Students as pioneers/researchers/agents of changeChange management approaches
Develop learning environment and ICT policies (BYOD)Institutional restructuring and major policy initiatives
Qualitative and quantitative research
Four different institutional approaches
1. Plymouth University (SEEDPoD): 'restructuring professional services'
2. University of Reading (Digitally Ready): 'readiness across the board'
3. University of the Arts, London (DIAL): 'transforming subject areas'
4. University of Greenwich (DL in transition): 'engaging staff and students'
12www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
Embedding Digital Literacy
Prof Neil Witt Dr Anne McDermott
Rob Stillwell
What Is SEEDPoD?
• Builds on 2011 BCUP project• Audit of systems, policies,
infrastructure and data• Views from academic and
support staff on use of, and practice with, existing software and hardware systems.
• Recommending Institutional change on DL issues around:
• Infrastructure• Support• Curriculum Design
13www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
14www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
The Digital Strategy
Opportunity 1 – inputting into Strategy
•Key theme 1 - Digital People•Key theme 2 - Digital teaching, learning and research•Key theme 3 - Digital services•Key theme 4 - Digital Infrastructure and Capability
15www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
Performance Development Review
Opportunity 2 – using new processes
Embed in PDREmbed in PDR
Embracing Change
Opportunity 3 – use Restructuring
16www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
An opportunity to recommend Institutional change:
• Infrastructure• Support
17www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
Being part of the solution
• Technology and Information Services – Strategy & Architecture– Solution Development– Service Management– Library and Digital Services– Academic Support, Technology & Innovation
• the annoying academic on the shoulder of the CIO
Being part of the solution
• Subject Librarians, IT Trainers and Learning Technologists working in 3 teamsDigital Skills Development Engagement and SupportTEL & Assessment
• Strong focus around Digital Literacy
• Faculty support via LTs in the Faculties
• Part of TIS, so embedding and sustainability of innovation easier
• Single point of entry for training & teaching and learning resources
• Focus on community development
18www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
19www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
Joining it all up
Embed in the curriculumEmbed in the curriculum
20www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
A caveat
• "This range of approaches has also had a significant impact on the kind of evidence presented at the end of the projects with research-based projects offering some compelling evidence, but with impact on much smaller numbers of students, whilst impact on the whole institution is harder to measure and present as evidence, but has much more significance in terms of sustainability and embedding. Funders should continue to value this „softer‟ evidence. "
Lou McGillCurriculum Delivery Programme Synthesis
21www.technologyenhancedlearning.net
Any Questions?
© University of Reading 2008 www.reading.ac.uk
Digitally Ready
April 11, 2023
Readinessacross the boardNadja Guggi, Digitally Ready Project Officer
Readiness across the board
Organisational challenges & issues• No formal ‘digital’ University strategies, policies or plans
• Risk-averse, collegiate in structure and culture
• Silos– Pockets of good practice– Dependence on individual initiative– Lack of co-ordination between key professional services
• Varying levels of digital literacies
• Little knowledge of student expectations, attitudes and use of technology
• Little knowledge of employer expectations
• Major organisational change
23
Readiness across the board 24
Digitally Ready: bottom up
• Digital community-building & upskilling– Digital Heroes– Micro funding to support local initiatives– Work with existing structures: professional services,
communities of practice, projects– Regular formal and informal events and training
opportunities– Blog, newsletter, Yammer
• Research– Digital literacies for student employability – Student technology attitudes and use
Readiness across the board
Digitally Ready: top down
• Senior management engagement– Steering Group: heads of key professional services
plus chaired by senior manager– University committee structure– Vice-Chancellor and Pro-Vice-Chancellor
as champions for change (e.g. video, events)
25
Readiness across the board
Key gains & changes• Genuine commitment from senior management to
developing digital literacies at institutional level– Learning & Teaching Strategy 2013–18 – TEL Strategy Group chaired by Pro-Vice-Chancelor
(digital literacies/TEL; infrastructure provision; digital communication & marketing; digital governance; staff & student development)
– Futurelearn membership
• Body of evidence to inform strategic decisions
• Better able to anticipate and meet student and employer expectations
• Emerging digital community
26
The DIAL Project
Aims: Cultural Change and Improved graduate employability.
Approach: Support a number of self-identifying and mutually supportive communities of staff and students within the university (based on courses, disciplines or other naturally occurring communities) who identify goals for improving their collective digital literacies.
Project blog: http://dial.myblog.arts.ac.uk/Project resources: http://process.arts.ac.uk/content/dial-projects-and-activities
Embedding Digital Literacies at UAL?• Are we a project or a programme?
Too big to be a project.
A sustainable DL programme.
Senior management support
UAL Digital life programme and DL programme.
Complicated landscape
• Managing expectations, demand, scope and capacity. DIAL will do everything DL.
Difficult to demonstrate benefits.
Difficult to deliver tangible outputsUnderstanding digital literacies at UAL definitions and competencies
• Meeting expectations, demand, scope and capacity. Expressions of interest with DIY built in evaluation
Extra funding
Two new DIAL coordinators (0.5)
Visualise and present projects and activities
Reduce DIAL brand
Improve web environments, outgrown the project blog
Digital Literacies: integration with curriculum and services.
• Project Groups; most groups are autonomous.• Collaborating with UAL services and departments.• Academic and curriculum integration• Project Groups supporting Academic and curriculum integration.• Natural cross sector collaboration/common interests (GSA)• Other general observations
• Project deliverables:StoriesOnline resources - OERsCase studiesNew communities of practice; face to face and virtual Workshops and training coursesCommissioned and in-house researchSector collaboration
University of Greenwich – http://www.DLinHE.com
EMPLOYMENT SECTOR
HIGHER EDUCATION
Challenges• How do we deliver a large-
scale institutional change project?
• How can we foster accelerated buy-in?
• How can we ensure currency?
• How can we develop sustainability?
INSTITUTION
FACULTY
University of Greenwich – http://www.DLinHE.com
Student change agents• Developed a cross-
university process for recruiting digitally-aligned change agents
• Promoted the use of e-editors within schools
• Student-developed workshop series
• Student-created resources
University of Greenwich – http://www.DLinHE.com
Gains• Students recognised as
valued contributors of change
• Discussions taking place that would not otherwise happen
• Excellent access to the student cohort and thus: ‘on pulse’
• New ways to meet institutional KPIs
What will we offer?
Self-assessment/self-development materials Briefings and OERs e.g. on social media, digital identity,
digital research Support for curriculum design and examples of digital
literacy development in different subject areas Organisational case studies and lessons learned Role descriptions and work with professional standards/
benchmarks e.g. UK PSF, CMALT, SCONUL Conceptual frameworks Institutional audit materials and checklist for planning/
evaluating digital literacy initiatives
bit.ly/JISCDDL